Skip to main content

Functionalized carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes of polymers of intrinsic microporosity for gas separation

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 December 2014


The present work reports on the gas transport behavior of mixed matrix membranes (MMM) which were prepared from multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and dispersed within polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) matrix. The MWCNTs were chemically functionalized with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) for a better dispersion in the polymer matrix. MMM-incorporating functionalized MWCNTs (f-MWCNTs) were fabricated by dip-coating method using microporous polyacrylonitrile membrane as a support and were characterized for gas separation performance. Gas permeation measurements show that MMM incorporated with pristine or functionalized MWCNTs exhibited improved gas separation performance compared to pure PIM-1. The f-MWCNTs MMM show better performance in terms of permeance and selectivity in comparison to pristine MWCNTs. The gas permeances of the derived MMM are increased to approximately 50% without sacrificing the selectivity at 2 wt.% of f-MWCNTs' loading. The PEG groups on the MWCNTs have strong interaction with CO2 which increases the solubility of polar gas and limit the solubility of nonpolar gas, which is advantageous for CO2/N2 selectivity. The addition of f-MWCNTs inside the polymer matrix also improved the long-term gas transport stability of MMM in comparison with PIM-1. The high permeance, selectivity, and long term stability of the fabricated MMM suggest that the reported approach can be utilized in practical gas separation technology.


During the last two decades, significant improvements in the performance of polymeric materials for gas separation membranes have been made[16], and understanding of the relationships between the polymer structure and gas transport properties of polymeric membranes has been greatly advanced[2, 3]. Despite these advantages and progresses, polymeric membranes are restricted by the trade-off trend between gas permeability and selectivity, as shown by Robeson[7]. Most of the researchers have paid special attention to the relationship between polymer structure and gas separation properties in order to improve membrane performance both in permeance and selectivity.

The permeability of a polymeric membrane is mainly controlled by the chain mobility, the packing density, and the free volume of the polymer structure. The introduction of rigid fillers having particle size close to the characteristic size of the macromolecules which form the selective polymer film can be the best technique to improve gas permeability by inhibiting molecular chain packing and increasing free volume. Therefore, mixed matrix membranes (MMM) defined as the synergistic combination of organic polymers with inorganic nanofillers (both permeable and impermeable) dispersed at the nanometer level have been studied as an alternative approach to solve the trade-off problem of polymeric membranes in gas separation[8, 9].

Proper material selection for both the polymer matrix and the inorganic phase is important in the development of MMM. It has been found that polymer properties as well as inorganic phase properties affect mixed matrix membranes morphology and thus influence the separation performance[10]. Compared to the pure polymer membranes, many polymer-inorganic MMM show higher permeabilities without sacrificing or even improve gas selectivity. Pinnau and He reported an unexpected increase of gas permeability without loss of gas selectivity in a series of high-free-volume glassy polymers whereby inorganic nonporous nanoparticles, such as fumed silica or carbon black, were incorporated into the polymeric matrix[11]. Some experimental studies used carbon nanotubes as inorganic nanofillers to fabricate MMM, and an improvement of the gas permeability compared to the neat polymer membranes was observed. For instance, Kim et al.[12] reported on the addition of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to poly(imide siloxane) membranes which resulted in increased O2, N2, and CH4 permeability. Cong et al.[13] prepared the brominated poly(2, 6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) composite membrane with single-walled CNTs or MWCNTs and found that the low concentration of CNTs addition increases the gas permeability without sacrificing the selectivity. Weng et al.[14] fabricated the MWCNTs/PBNPI membrane. In their results both the permeabilities and the selectivities of H2, CO2, and CH4 improved significantly at high MWCNTs concentrations (>5 wt.%). Based on these investigations, one can conclude that the interaction between polymer matrix and nanotubes may disrupt the polymer chain packing thus enhancing gas diffusion due to introducing more free volume voids between the polymer chains and nanoscale defects on the polymer/nanofillers interface.

Tailoring the free volume cavities by controlling the macromolecule's size and shape of the microporous polymer directly influences gas transport properties[15]. In particular, a novel class of high free volume, glassy, ladder-type polymers, referred to as polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM), is a potential candidate for highly effective gas separation membranes comprising the capability for gas permeability and selectivity optimization by changing the polymer chain packing[16]. McKeown et al.[17, 18] were the first to report this new class of rigid ladder-type polydioxanes containing highly contorted chains. Among these, PIM-1, containing the contorted spirobisindane unit, has attracted the most attention due to its relative ease of synthesizing high molecular weight polymers and the combining outstanding permeability with relatively moderate but technically attractive selectivity[19, 20], especially for O2/N2 and CO2/CH4 pairs, which shows the upper bound trade-off introduced by Robeson[7]. However, a major drawback in the practical use of PIM-1 is the significant decay of its gas permeability with time.

In the present work, MMM were fabricated by loading of functionalized MWCNTs (f-MWCNTs) as an inorganic dispersed phase and PIM-1 as a polymer matrix. The MWCNTs were chosen because they had been proven to be promising nanofillers in tailoring polymeric material suited to be prescribed for application even at low incorporation[21]. To the best of our knowledge, so far there is no literature available on using MWCNTs combined with PIM-1 as polymer matrix for gas separation. However, it is well documented that for sufficient enhancement of MMM performance, the dispersion of MWCNTs in the polymer matrix should be very fine, which means that the surface interaction between the filler and the polymer matrices should be strong[10]. In response to that, the MWCNTs were functionalized with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as a spacer via ‘grafting to’ method[22] to facilitate their dispersion in the PIM-1 matrix. The as-prepared MMM were characterized for their morphology using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Gas permeability, permselectivity, and long term membrane stability were studied by pure gas permeation measurements.



The monomer 5,5,6,6-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3,3-tetramethyl-1,1-spirobisindane (TTSBI, 97%) was obtained from ABCR (GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile (TFTPN, 99%) was kindly donated by Lanxess (Bitterfeld, Germany). TFTPN was sublimated twice under vacuum prior to use. Potassium carbonate (K2CO3, >99.5%) was dried overnight under vacuum at 120°C in order to ensure no moisture is trapped in it and then milled in a ball mill for 15 min. The MWCNTs were supplied by FutureCarbon GmbH (Bayreuth, Germany) (purity >98%, surface area of 250 m2/g, diameter varies from 12 to 15 nm, and number of walls was 8 to 12). Poly(ethylene glycol) of 200 g/mol and diethylbenzene (isomeric mixture) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Logistik GmbH, Schnelldorf, Germany); dimethyl acetamide (DMAc, ≥99%), nitric acid (HNO3, 65% v/v), thionyl chloride (SOCl2, ≥99%), tetrahydrofurane (THF, ≥ 99,9%), methanol (≥99.9%), chloroform (CHCl3, 99.99%), and dioxane (≥99%) from Merck (Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used as received.


Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was conducted using a Bruker Equinox 55 (Bruker Optics, Bremen, Germany). The samples were mixed with KBr, and pellets were prepared under hydraulic press force of 10 t. Pellets were vacuum-dried at 35°C for 12 h. The transmission measurements were done in a spectral range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and average of 64 scans. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to investigate the weight changes of f-MWCNTs samples as a function of temperature using Netzsch TG209 F1 Iris instrument (NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). The experiments were conducted under argon flow from 25°C to 900°C at 10 K/min. The weight loss was estimated from 100°C to 600°C in this study. A LEO Gemini 1550 VP instrument (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with field emission cathode operated at 1–1.5 kV was used to study the morphology of pure PIM-1 and MMM. SEM was also used to observe the compatibility between CNTs and the polymer matrix. For cross section analysis, the samples were fractured in liquid nitrogen in order to have distinct view of the membrane's selective layer section. Before scanning, the membrane samples were coated with Au/Pd in a sputter-coater. The permeation test involved the use of a gas permeation cell in which the membrane was placed on a sintered metal plate and pressurized at the feed side. Gas permeation rates were determined by a constant pressure variable volume system using a BIOS Definer™ 220 flow meter (Bios International Corporation, Butler, NJ, USA). Figure1 illustrates the gas permeation test facility.

Figure 1
figure 1

Gas permeation test facility.

The pressure-normalized gas permeation flux or permeance for gas i, can be calculated as follows:

P l i = Q i A Δ p

Where Q i is the volumetric flow rate of gas i (normal cubic meter per hour), Δp is the pressure difference across the membrane (bar), A is the membrane-effective surface area (square meters) and l is the membrane-separating layer thickness (centimeters). The ideal separation factor αi/j was calculated by using the following equation:

α i / j = P i P j

The long-term stability test was carried out at a similar facility at constant pressure (2 bar) and 27°C. The gas flow rate was measured manually using a flow meter (Bioblock Scientific, Cedex, France). All data presented in this study were collected for at least three stamps of MMM of the same origin in order to obtain statistically valid results.

Experimental details

Functionalization of MWCNTs

(a) Oxidation of the MWCNTs

The MWCNTs were dispersed in HNO3 in a round bottom flask. After 30 min of sonication at room temperature, the solution was heated to 65°C and continuously stirred for 48 h. The dispersion was then filtered and washed with ample amounts of distilled water until the pH = 7 was achieved. Finally, the oxidized carbon nanotubes were dried under vacuum at 60°C for 72 h.

(b) Conversion of carboxylated MWCNTs to acyl chloride MWCNTs and esterification

The carboxyl groups of the oxidized MWCNTs were transformed into acid chloride groups by stirring the dispersion with SOCl2 for 24 h at 65°C. After reaction, the dispersion was generously washed with THF, filtered, and dried overnight at ambient temperature. Then acyl chloride-functionalized MWCNTs were added in PEG (200 g/mol) heated to 120°C and stirred for 48 h. Finally, functionalized carbon nanotubes were washed with THF and filtered through a Teflon® membrane (Sartorius Stedium Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) (0.2 μm pore size), followed by drying at ambient temperature for 48 h[22].

Synthesis and characterization of polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1)

PIM-1 was prepared by using a fast synthesis method originally developed by Du et al.[23]. A slightly modified procedure for PIM-1[24] was carried out as follows: equimolar ratio of TTSBI and TFTPN was dissolved in DMAc to form an orange-red solution. The addition of K2CO3 (2.3 times with respect to -OH monomer concentration) caused the color change to yellow. The reaction mixture was immersed in an oil bath maintained at 150°C and kept under a continuous flow of argon. After 5 min the precipitate appeared and the reaction mixture became viscous, then diethylbenzene (DEB; same amount with respect to DMAc amount) was added into the reaction mixture, otherwise stirring could not be done easily. The stirring continued for a further 1 h, and the polymer was isolated by precipitation in methanol and filtered off. The polymer was boiled in water for several hours to remove salts and solvent residues, and then filtered off and dried overnight at 60°C. The dried polymer was dissolved in chloroform and reprecipitated again in methanol and then dried overnight at 60°C in vacuum to yield 90% PIM-1. The average molecular weight (Mw) and polydispersity (Mw/Mn) of the prepared PIM-1 is 2.21 × 105 (gmol−1) and 4.8, respectively, which are determined by size exclusion chromatography in chloroform against polystyrene standards.

Mixed matrix membrane preparation

PIM-1 was first dissolved in chloroform and stirred for 2 h. Chloroform dispersions of f-MWCNTs were homogenized for 40 min with an ultrasonic probe (Bandelin SONOPULS, Bandelin Electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) (frequency = 20 kHz) and blended with PIM-1 polymer solution and stirred overnight. The blend ratio of f-MWCNTs was 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 wt.% (in respect to polymer) with 1 wt.% polymer concentration in chloroform. A HZG in-house manufactured polyacrylonitrile (PAN) microporous membrane with an average pore size of 25 nm and with 15% surface porosity was used as a support for thin film composite membrane formation. The nitrogen permeance for PAN microporous membrane was around 120 Nm3/ at ambient temperature and shows the Knudsen selectivity. PIM-1/f-MWCNTs MMM were prepared by dip-coating using an in-house made lab dip coater (band having loop form of 10 to 20 cm wide and 100 cm long). The details of membrane fabrication conditions are shown in Table1.

Table 1 Process parameters and membrane fabrication conditions

Results and discussion

Functionalization of MWCNTs

The surface modification of MWCNTs followed by covalent bonding of polymer chains on the surface of MWCNTs is depicted in Figure2.

Figure 2
figure 2

Functionalization of pristine MWCNTs via ‘grafting to’ method.

A similar procedure has been reported previously by other groups[25, 26]. The first step shows the oxidation of pristine MWCNTs with HNO3. The aims of the chosen acid treatment are disaggregation of nanotube bundles, dissolution of the catalysts, and the removal of by-products (e.g amorphous carbon). Further reaction between the oxidized carbon nanotubes and thionyl chloride leads to the formation of acyl chloride groups. The acyl chloride groups are highly reactive and can further react with poly(ethylene glycol) to form esters. The pristine and functionalized MWCNTs were characterized by TGA and FTIR .

Thermal gravimetric analysis

The TGA of all three different samples of MWCNTs shows that no weight loss occurred below 100°C, which indicates the absence of a residual solvent. As revealed by the TGA curve shown in Figure3, the pristine MWCNTs do not show significant weight loss up to 1,000°C. Both oxidized and PEG-grafted MWCNTs show weight loss between 100°C and 800°C. The weight loss observed after oxidation was 2 wt.% and after PEG grafting it was 4 wt.%. Hence, it can be concluded that about 2 wt.% of PEG were grafted on MWCNTs[27].

Figure 3
figure 3

TGA analysis of pristine MWCNTs, carboxyl MWCNTs, and PEG-grafted MWCNTs.

Although the reaction has been performed at high concentration of very low molecular weight PEG in the absence of the solvent, it is expected that during thorough washing processes, the entire unreacted PEG was washed out (washing was continued until constant mass loss in TGA was observed). Thus, the mass loss occurred only from the covalently attached PEG on the surface of the MWCNTs. Based on these results, the amount of PEG chains grafted on the MWCNTs was estimated (as above), and the concentration of PEG chains on the MWCNTs were calculated to be about 0.09 mmol/g.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Figure4 shows the infrared spectrum of the pristine MWCNTs and PEG-grafted MWCNTs. The signals between 1,650 and 1,540 cm−1 indicated the C = C stretching mode of the aromatic ring. The peak at 1,724 cm−1 was attributed to the C = O stretching vibration of the ester carbonyl group. The stretching vibrations of the repeating -OCH2CH2 units of PEG and -COO bonds were observed at 1,092 and 1,240 cm−1, respectively, which is the evidence of a successful reaction. An asymmetric and symmetric stretching of C-H deformation is observed for PEG-MWCNTs at 2,927 and 2,853 cm−1 respectively, which is not observed in MWCNTs spectra but clearly observed in PEG-MWCNTs.

Figure 4
figure 4

Infrared spectra of pristine MWCNTs and PEG-grafted MWCNTs.

Polymer (PIM-1) synthesis

PIM-1 was synthesized by reacting with a molar equivalent of 5,5,6,6-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3,3-tetramethyl-1,1-spirobisindane and 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile with an excess of K2CO3 (Figure5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Synthesis of PIM-1, a-reagent and condition, K 2 CO 3 , DMAc, and DEB at 150°C for 1 h.

The polymer was synthesized based on the modified rapid synthesis of PIM-1. DEB was introduced to this reaction system instead of toluene, which is different from previous polymerization protocols[17, 23], and seemed advantageous because of its higher boiling point (150°C)[28]. DEB was also added in the required minimal amounts to keep the mixture stirrable. The polymer was characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and IR spectroscopy.

MMM morphology

Effect of pristine and f-MWCNTs on MMM morphology

Figure6 shows the SEM images of PIM-1 and PIM-1 incorporated with pristine and f- MWCNTs (1 wt.%) MMM. It was observed that the average thickness of all these membranes was 0.75 μm (Figure6). When pristine MWCNTs were incorporated into the PIM-1 matrix, the resulting MMM contained agglomerated MWCNTs showed by white circle, which are clearly observable from the cross section (Figure6d). The surface and cross section images of f-MWCNTs MMM indicated that most of the functionalized MWCNTs were well dispersed in PIM-1 matrix (Figure6e, f). There was also no evidence of interfacial voids in the prepared MMM. The explanation for the agglomeration of MWCNTs in the polymer matrix was that the interactions between the MWCNTs (π-π interaction) are stronger than that with the polymer matrix[2932]. Therefore, the pristine MWCNTs tend to agglomerate and do not distribute well in PIM-1 matrix. The presence of PEG on the surface of MWCNTs appeared to de-bundle the highly entangled MWCNTs which resulted in improved dispersion throughout the PIM-1 matrix.

Figure 6
figure 6

SEM images of surface and cross section of PIM-1. (a, b), MMM of MWCNTs (c, d) and f-MWCNTs (e, f).

Effect of f-MWCNTs content on MMM morphology

Figure7 shows the surface and cross section morphology of PIM-1/f-MWCNTs MMM at different f-MWCNTs loading. Figure6a shows the smooth surface of the pure PIM-1 membrane which was nearly defect-free while Figures6e, f and7a, b, c, d depicts the f-MWCNTs which tend to be well distributed throughout the polymer matrix independent of the f-MWCNTs loading (0.5 to 2 wt.%). No evidence of f-MWCNTs agglomeration or interface void was found even at higher magnification. As the MWCNTs loadings were further increased from 2.0 to 3.0 wt.%, the nanotubes tend to agglomerate and be not well distributed throughout the PIM-1 matrix. Also, the defects and interface voids around the f-MWCNTs agglomerates could be found on the surface of this MMM (Figure7e, f). Therefore, more interface voids and agglomeration decreased the permeability of gases as the f-MWCNTs loading in PIM-1 matrix were increased from 2 to 3 wt.%.

Figure 7
figure 7

SEM images of surface and cross section of PIM-1 MMM incorporated with different f-MWCNT loading. 0.5 wt.% (a, b); 2 wt.% (c, d); and 3 wt.% (e, f) (PIM-1 and 1 wt.% f-MWCNT/PIM-1 MMM are shown in Figure6a, b, e, f).

From these observations, the threshold limit for the addition of CNTs to the polymer matrix to prevent agglomeration is typically around 3 wt.%, and the optimum limit for the addition of f-MWCNTs is 2 wt.% which corresponds to the significant improvement in the separation properties of the MMM, as discussed in ‘Effects of f-MWCNTs content on MMM gas separation performance’ Section.

Gas permeation measurement

Effects of pristine and f-MWCNTs on MMM gas separation performance

The gas permeation properties of MMM were investigated by incorporating 1.0 wt.% of pristine and PEG-functionalized MWCNT in PIM-1 matrix. Permeance of CO2, CH4, N2, and O2 for pure PIM-1 and MMM as well as the respective permeability calculated from the thickness of selective layer are shown in Table2.

Table 2 Comparison of gas permeation results of PIM-1, MMM of f-MWCNTs and MWCNTs

The permeation measurements were carried out using pure O2, N2, CO2, and CH4 at 2 bar feed pressure at room temperature (27°C). It was observed that the MMM incorporated with pristine and PEG-functionalized MWCNTs have higher gas permeabilities compared to pure PIM-1. Moreover, the permeability of CO2 was higher for f-MWCNTs-incorporated MMM than for pristine MWCNTs-incorporated MMM. Table3 shows the selectivity of CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and O2/N2 gas pairs of PIM-1 and MMM prepared by incorporation of both pristine MWCNTs and f-MWCNTs.

Table 3 Comparison of various gas pair selectivities of PIM-1 and MMM of f-MWCNTs and MWCNTs

The CO2/CH4 selectivities have decreased in case of both f-MWCNTs and pristine MWCNTs-incorporated MMM. However, the observed CO2/CH4 selectivities are higher than that of MMM reported in literature using carboxyl-functionalized MWCNTs as inorganic filler in different glassy polymers (e.g., polyethersulfone and polyimide)[13, 33].

From the results presented in Tables4 and5, it should be emphasized that the acid treatment of MWCNTs and consequent surface functionalization with PEG influenced both the permeability and selectivity of MMM. The most prevailing theory is that, after removing the catalyst particles, the amorphous carbon and the metal nanoparticles through the oxidation process with acidic mixtures, the surface area and micropore volume of CNTs increase and result in the occurence of adsorption sites. Few researchers[34, 35] have investigated the physical adsorption of gas in CNTs and they found that the inner hollow cavities of CNTs could hold molecules or atoms by adsorption or capillarity, while Yang et al.[36] reported that the aggregated pores of high purity MWCNTs can adsorb N2 gas as extremely high as 750 mg/g.

Table 4 Gas permeation results of PIM-1, PIM-1 f-MWCNTs incorporated MMM
Table 5 Various gas pair selectivity of PIM-1 and PIM-1 MMM-incorporated f-MWCNTs

This could verify that the addition of pristine MWCNTs did not affect the selectivity of O2/N2. Interestingly, when PEG functionalization was applied onto MWCNTs, the selectivity of CO2/N2 of this MMM increased even at 1.0 wt.% loading of MWCNTs. This increase could be due to the higher compatibility of the polymer matrix with the surface of PEG-functionalized MWCNTs than that of pristine MWCNTs and preferential sorption of CO2 on the PEG chains of MWCNTs.

Effects of f-MWCNTs content on MMM gas separation performance

In order to systematically investigate the effect of f-MWCNTs incorporation on the MMM gas separation performance, MMM were fabricated with different loadings of f-MWCNTs. The permeance and respective permeability (calculated from the thickness of selective layer using membrane's cross section SEM image) of O2, N2, CO2, and CH4 at different f-MWCNTs loadings are shown in Table4. The order of gas permeance is CO2 > O2 > CH4 > N2. Gas permeance increased with f-MWCNTs loading from 0.5 to 2 wt.%. An increase in the free volume of the PIM-1 as a result of the disruption of the polymer chains packing due to the interaction between surface of PEG-functionalized MWCNTs and the PIM-1 chains might have contributed to the increment of the permeability. However, with 3 wt.% loading permeability of O2, N2, and CH4 decreased, except CO2, it was unchanged compared to 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs-incorporated MMM.

Permeation measurements used pure gas O2, N2, CO2, CH4 of 2 bar feed pressure at room temperature (27°C). Table5 shows the selectivity of O2/N2, CO2/N2, and CO2/CH4 for the PIM-1 and f-MWCNTs/PIM-1 MMM, measured at 2 bar. At 0.5 to 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs loading the selectivity of CO2/N2 and O2/N2 was found to be higher than for pure PIM-1. The high selectivity values of O2/N2 at 0.5 to 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs loading might have resulted due to the intimate interface interaction of f-MWCNTs-polymer chain. In contrary, the CO2/CH4 selectivity of the f-MWCNTs MMM is worse compared with the pure PIM-1 membrane. The functional groups on the MWCNTs have a significant role in gas selectivity. The PEG group, confirmed by FTIR in Figure4, has stronger interaction with a polar gas, such as CO2 than a nonpolar gas, e.g., N2. In that case the polar gas solubility can be enhanced and the gas permeability be increased which facilitates the improvement of the total CO2/N2 selectivity. However, there is no improvement in the CO2/CH4 selectivity as f-MWCNTs loading increased from 0.5 to 3 wt.% in the polymer matrix.

Effect of f-MWCNTs on long-term stability of MMM

The long-term stability of f-MWCNTs containing MMM continuously exposed to air at 2 bar pressure was monitored and the results are shown in Figure8. The O2 permeance of the fabricated membranes was measured over a period of 550 h Figure8a. It was observed that the O2 permeance of f-MWCNTs MMM slowly and gradually decreased with time compared with the much more significant O2 permeance loss as a function of time observed for the pure PIM-1 composite membrane. The permeance trends for f-MWCNTs MMM are PIM-1 < 0.5 < 1 < 3 < 2 wt.%. Among these 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs MMM shows the better performance in long-term stability. A similar trend was found for the change of N2 permeance as a function of time for different f-MWCNTs MMM. Compared to PIM-1 composite membrane, the f-MWCNTs MMM tend to have better long-term stability, although none of the studied membranes has shown permeance stabilization after 550 h of continuous experiments.

Figure 8
figure 8

Long term stability of PIM-1. PIM-1 MMM incorporated with f-MWCNTs measured as (a) O2 permeance; (b) relative permeance. Black squares, PIM-1; red circles, 0.5 wt.% MMM; blue triangles, 1 wt.% MMM; green inverted triangles, 2 wt.% MMM; and pink diamonds, 3 wt.% MMM. Temperature, 27°C and feed pressure, 2 bar.

Furthermore, Figure8b shows the relative permeance data for f-MWCNTs containing MMM, where the maximum total O2 permeance loss was found for the pure PIM-1 composite membrane studied. The trend of 0.5 wt.% of f-MWCNTs MMM is less significant, while for the 1 and 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs MMM, the loss of permeance is very limited. From these experimental results, it can be concluded that the addition of f-MWCNTs into the polymer matrix improved the long-term stability of PIM-1.


Mixed matrix membranes or MMM comprising MWCNTs as dispersed phase and PIM-1 as polymer matrix were successfully prepared. FTIR and TGA analysis have confirmed the successful PEG functionalization of MWCNTs. The SEM images of the prepared MMM revealed that the functionalized MWCNTs are well dispersed throughout the PIM-1 matrix compared to the one which is fabricated from pristine MWCNTs. It was shown that the improvement in homogeneous dispersion of MWCNTs in the MMM is due to covalent functionalization of MWCNTs with poly(ethylene glycol). With good interfacial adhesion and the absence of voids between f-MWCNTs and polymer matrix, the MMM show higher permeabilities which are coupled with increased CO2/N2 and O2/N2 selectivities. For MMM with 0.5 to 2 wt.% f-MWCNTs loading, the SEM of surface and cross-sectional images showed well dispersed f-MWCNTs throughout the polymer matrix, while at 3 wt.% of f-MWCNTs loading, the tubes agglomerated and formed domains or interface voids in the polymer matrix. Above a threshold of 2 wt.%, agglomeration and saturation of f-MWCNTs particle in the polymer matrix hinder the fast transport of gases. In addition, PEG functional groups on the surface of MWCNTs provide higher solubilities of CO2 in the MMM. The improvement in long-term stability was obtained as well.


  1. Koros WJ: Gas separation membranes: needs for combined materials science and processing approaches. Macromol Symp 2002, 188: 13–22. 10.1002/1521-3900(200211)188:1<13::AID-MASY13>3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pandey P, Chauhan RS: Membranes for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26: 853–893. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maier G: Gas separation with polymer membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998, 37: 2960–2974. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981116)37:21<2960::AID-ANIE2960>3.0.CO;2-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. George SC, Thomas S: Transport phenomena through polymeric systems. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26: 985–1017. 10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00036-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman BD, Pinnau I: Polymeric materials for gas separations. ACS Symp Ser 1999, 733: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ismail AF, Lorna W: Penetrant-induced plasticization phenomenon in glassy polymers for gas separation membrane. Sep Purif Technol 2002, 27: 173–194. 10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00211-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robeson LM: The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 2008, 320: 390–400. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng F, Lu L, Sun H, Wang Y, Liu J, Jiang Z: Hybrid organic-inorganic membrane: solving the tradeoff between permeability and selectivity. Chem Mater 2005, 17: 6790–6796. 10.1021/cm051890q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Van der Bruggen B: The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment. Environ Pollut 2010, 158: 2335–2349. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung TS, Ying Jiang L, Lia Y, Kulprathipanja S: Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32: 483–507. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinnau I, He Z: Filled superglassy membrane. 2001. US Patent 6316684 US Patent 6316684

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim S, Pechar TW, Marand E: Poly(imide siloxane) and carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Desalination 2006, 192: 330–339. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cong HL, Zhang JM, Radosz M, Shen YQ: Carbon nanotube composite membranes of brominated poly(2,6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2007, 294: 178–185. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weng TH, Tseng HH, Wey MY: Preparation and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotube/PBNPI nanocomposite membrane for H2/CH4 separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34: 8707–8715. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park HB, Jung CH, Lee YM, Hill AJ, Pas SJ, Mudie ST, Wagner EV, Freeman BD, Cookson DJ: Polymers with cavities tuned for fast selective transport of small molecules and ions. Science 2007, 318: 254–258. 10.1126/science.1146744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmerman CM, Koros WJ: Polypyrrolones for membrane gas separations. I. Structural comparison of gas transport and sorption properties. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 1999, 37: 1235. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990615)37:12<1235::AID-POLB5>3.0.CO;2-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKeown NB, Budd PM, Msayib K, Ghanem B: Microporous polymer material. 2005. International Patent WO05012397 International Patent WO05012397

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKeown NB, Makhseed S: Organic microporous materials. 2003. International Patent WO03000774 International Patent WO03000774

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKeown NB, Budd PM: Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): organic materials for membrane separations, heterogeneous catalysis and hydrogen storage. Chem Soc Rev 2006, 35: 675. 10.1039/b600349d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKeown NB, Budd PM, Msayib K, Ghanem B: Microporous polymer material. 2006. US Patent Application 20060246273 US Patent Application 20060246273

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bikiaris D, Vassiliou A, Chrissafis K, Paraskevopoulos KM, Jannakoudakis A, Docoslis A: Effect of acid treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical, permeability, thermal properties and thermo-oxidative stability of isotactic polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stab 2008, 93: 952–967. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Albuerne J, Boschetti-de-Fierro A, Abetz V: Modification of multiwall carbon nanotubes by grafting from controlled polymerization of styrene: effect of the characteristics of the nanotubes. J Poly Sci Part B Polym Phys 2010, 48: 1035–1046. 10.1002/polb.21992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Du N, Song J, Robertson GP, Pinnau I, Guiver MD: Linear high molecular weight ladder polymer via fast polycondensation of 5,5′,6,6′-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylspirobisindane with 1,4-dicyanotetrafluorobenzene. Macromol Rapid Commun 2008, 29: 783–788. 10.1002/marc.200800038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fritsch D, Bengtson G, Carta M, McKeown NB: Synthesis and gas permeation properties of spirobischromane-based polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Macromol Chem Phys 2011, 212: 1137–1146. 10.1002/macp.201100089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kong H, Gao C, Yan D: Functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by atom transfer radical polymerization and defunctionalization of the products. Macromolecules 2004, 37: 4022–4030. 10.1021/ma049694c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin S, Qin D, Ford WT, Resasco DE, Herrera JE: Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with polystyrene via grafting to and grafting from methods. Macromolecules 2004, 37: 752–757. 10.1021/ma035214q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baskaran D, Mays JW, Bratcher MS: Noncovalent and nonspecific molecular interactions of polymers with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater 2005, 17: 3389–3397. 10.1021/cm047866e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fritsch D, Heinrich K, Bengtson G: Polymers of intrinsic microporosity: copolymers improved synthesis and application as membrane separation material. PMSE Prepr 2009, 101: 761.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Donavon MD, Kent AW, Joseph GS, Thomas CC, John WC: Investigation of aromatic/aliphatic polyimides as dispersants for single wall carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 2006, 39: 1731–1739. 10.1021/ma051826u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huipeng C, Zhen L, Peggy C: Chain confinement in electrospun nanofibers of PET with carbon nanotubes. Polymer 2009, 50: 872–880. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen M, Yu HW, Chen JH, Koo HS: Effect of purification treatment on adsorption characteristics of carbon nanotubes. Diamond Relat Mater 2007, 16: 1110–1115. 10.1016/j.diamond.2006.12.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ugarte D, Chatelain A, De Heer WA: Nanocapillarity and chemistry in carbon nanotubes. Science 1996, 274: 1897–1899. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Montazer-Rahmati MM, Matsuura T: Effect of chitosan as a functionalization agent on the performance and separation properties of polyimide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix flat sheet membranes. J Membr Sci 2010, 364: 309–317. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dujardin E, Ebbesen TW, Hiura H, Tanigaki K: Capillarity and wetting of carbon nanotubes. Science 1994, 265: 1850–1852. 10.1126/science.265.5180.1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yin YF, Mays T, McEnaney B: Adsorption of nitrogen in carbon nanotube arrays. Langmuir Langmuir 1999, 15: 8714–8718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Lin Y, Wang J, Lai M, Li J, Liu J, Tong X, Cheng H: Morphology, thermal stability, and dynamic mechanical properties of atactic polypropylene/carbon nanotube composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2005, 98: 1087–1091. 10.1002/app.21206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Silke Dargel, Silvio Neumann, Petra Merten, Bahadir Gacal, Shahid Majeed, and Anne Schroeder for their technical support. This work was financially supported by the project ‘High Aspect Ratio Carbon-based Nanocomposites’ (HARCANA) within the European Community's 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development under the grant agreement number NMP3-LA-2008-213277.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Abetz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MMK carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript, GB, SS, MR contributed in useful discussions and manuscript preparation; VF and VA supervised the study. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

An erratum to this article can be found online at 10.1186/1556-276X-9-698.

An erratum to this article is available at

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.M., Filiz, V., Bengtson, G. et al. Functionalized carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes of polymers of intrinsic microporosity for gas separation. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 504 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Mixed matrix membrane
  • Multi-walled carbon nanotubes
  • Polymer of intrinsic microporosity