 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Subwavelength FabryPerot resonator: a pair of quantum dots incorporated with gold nanorod
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 7, Article number: 546 (2012)
Abstract
The two apexes of an elongated gold nanorod (GNR) irradiated by a plane wave are shown to be the hotspots at the longitudinal plasmon modes. This phenomenon implies that a pair of quantum dots (QDs) located at these apexes might be excited simultaneously if the excitation band of QDs coincides with one of these modes. Consequently, a coherent emission of the two emitters could happen subsequently. In the following coherent emission, these twolevel emitters are simulated as two oscillating dipoles (bidipole) with some possible phase differences. Our results show that the maximum radiative and nonradiative powers of the bidipole occur at the longitudinal plasmon dipole, quadrupole, sextupole, and octupole modes of GNR. Moreover, the strongest emissions are induced by the inphase bidipole coupled to the odd modes and the 180° outofphase one to the even modes, respectively. The excitation and emission behaviors of a pair of QDs incorporated with GNR demonstrate the possibility of using this structure as a subwavelength resonator of FabryPerot type. In addition, the correlation between these modes of the GNR and the dispersion relation of gold nanowire is also discussed.
Background
Single photon of a quantum dot (QD) coupling with the surface plasmon polaritons of metallic nanowire has attracted wide attentions recently [1–4]. In addition, the dispersion relations of the surface plasmon polaritons (or waves) along gold or silver nanowire [5–9] and the longitudinal plasmon modes of gold or silver nanorods [10, 11] have been studied extensively. The nanoantenna effect and FabryPerot resonator of gold nanorod (GNR) through the longitudinal plasmon modes for the emission of nanoemitters (e.g., QD and molecule) have also been studied in the past decade [12–14]. The correlation between the surface plasmon polaritons of metallic nanowire and the plasmon modes of nanorod is an important pivot in linking the submicron and the nanooptics [15, 16]. Because the lowerorder plasmon modes of an elongated metallic nanorod are within the nearinfrared (NIR) regime [14], it is particularly worth for study. Recently, these longitudinal plasmon modes of nanorods and nanowires have been investigated using the electric energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) [17–20]. Moreover, the plasmonenhanced fluorescence of a fluorophore endlinked to GNR has also been demonstrated [21]. In addition, the excitonplasmon structure of two identical QDs coupling to gold nanoparticle has been studied theoretically [22].
In this paper, the longitudinal plasmon modes of an elongated GNR irradiated by a plane wave will be studied first to illustrate that the apexes of GNR are the hotspots at these modes. This phenomenon implies that a pair of QDs at these areas might be excited simultaneously with the aid of the plasmon modes of GNR. Once the two QDs are excited and start to emit photon coherently, they are modeled as two electric dipoles with a phase difference in our analysis. To clarify the transition roles from metallic nanorod to nanowire, we investigate the plasmonic enhancement of an elongated GNR with a higher aspect ratio (AR), e.g., AR = 8, on the luminescence of nearby QDs. The farfield radiation patterns and the nearfield distributions of the system will be analyzed, particularly at longitudinal plasmon modes of the GNR. In addition, the correlation between these modes and the dispersion relation of a gold nanowire (GNW) will be addressed.
Methods
In this paper, we study theoretically the emission of two QDs located, respectively, at the two ends of an elongated GNR, as shown in Figure 1. These two QDs are modeled as two identical electricdipole emitters, oscillating with some possible phase differences. The problem is dealt with classical electromagnetic theory. The QDs are assumed to align along the central line of GNR, where the distance between QDs and GNR is denoted by d. The geometry of GNR is assumed to consist of a circular cylinder with two hemispherical endcaps. The radius of GNR is denoted by a, and the length is by L. The AR of GNR is defined as L/(2a). The orientations of the dipole moments of the two QDs are assumed parallel to the long axis of GNR. Throughout the paper, the time factor exp(−iωt) is omitted.
We assume that the GNR is placed on a glass substrate in air. The effective refractive index of the surrounding medium is denoted by n; n = (1−β) n_{sub} + β n_{air}, where the value of β is taken as 0.5, hence n = 1.25. The permittivity of gold is referred in [23]. Note that the wavelength of light, λ, throughout this paper is referred to that in vacuum; the corresponding wavelength in the surrounding medium is then λ/n. We employed the multiple multipole (MMP) method to analyze the electromagnetic field of the problem, based on the Maxwell’s equations [24, 25].
The radiative power of bidipole is defined as
where S can be any arbitrary closed surface enclosing the GNR and the bidipole [25]. The nonradiative power due to the ohmic loss in GNR is defined as
where S_{c} is the surface of GNR [25, 26].
On the other hand, the dispersion relation of an infinitely long GNW can be obtained by solving the transcendental equation [27–29]
where J_{0} and J_{1} are Bessel functions of the first kind of order 0 and 1, respectively, and H_{0}^{(1)} and H_{1}^{(1)} are Hankel functions of the first kind of order 0 and 1. Here, ζ_{1} and ζ_{2} are related to the wavenumber k as ${\zeta}_{i}^{2}=\mu {\epsilon}_{i}{\omega}^{2}{k}^{2}$, where ε_{1} and ε_{2} are the permittivity of the surrounding medium and gold, respectively, and μ is the permeability. The complex roots $k={k}^{\prime}+i{k}^{\u2033}$ are found numerically to satisfy Equation 3 under the conditions, ${k}^{\prime}\ge 0$ and $\omega =2\pi \phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}c/\lambda $, for a given angular frequency $\omega =2\pi \phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}c/\lambda $, where c is the light speed in vacuum. The phase velocity of the surface plasmon wave in GNW is ${v}_{\text{p}}=\omega /k\text{'}$, and the group velocity ${v}_{\text{g}}=\partial \omega /\partial {k}^{\prime}$.
Results and discussion
In order to identify the longitudinal plasmon modes of GNR, the optical responses of GNR is analyzed first. The scattering cross section (SCS), absorption cross section (ACS), and extinction cross section (ECS) efficiencies of GNR (a = 30 nm, AR = 8) irradiated by an obliquely incident plane wave of θ = 15° are shown in Figure 2. Here, the wavenumber vector and the polarization vector of the incident wave and the long axis of GNR are assumed to be in the same plane. These curves show that the first (dipole), second (quadrupole), and third (sextupole) plasmon modes are at 1,870, 960, and 700 nm, respectively. The normalized electric field distributions at these modes are also plotted in Figure 3. These results show that the two apexes of GNR are the hotspots at these longitudinal plasmon modes; the local electric field at these two apexes is amplified. This phenomenon is due to not only the lightening rod effect of GNR but also the strong plasmonic oscillation and implies that a femtosecond laser may excite two QDs located at the two apexes simultaneously through these plasmon modes if the excitation band of QDs coincides with one of these modes. As a result, the coherent emission of the two excited QDs could happen subsequently. Therefore, the coherent emission of the two QDs under the influence of GNR is worth of further study. In the following analysis, the two emitting QDs are modeled as two electric dipoles (bidipole) and the twolevel emitters.
Subsequently, the radiative and nonradiative powers of bidipole with phase difference (φ = 0°, 90°, 180°) in the presence of a GNR (a = 30 nm, AR = 8) are shown in Figure 4a,b respectively, where d = 15 nm. For comparison, the results for a single dipole in the presence of GNR are also presented. In this paper, the radiative and nanoradiative powers are normalized by the values of a free dipole’s radiative power. Figure 4a,b indicates that the first, second, third, and fourth modes are at 1,910, 970, 710, and 610 nm, respectively. The peaks of these plasmon modes are little redshifted from those induced by a plane wave, where the first and second modes are at the NIR regime. Note that the absorption band with a peak at 520 nm, as shown in Figure 4b, is due to the interband transition in gold, rather than any longitudinal plasmon mode. Figure 4a,b suggests that the odd modes are easily induced by the inphase (φ = 0°) bidipole due to the antisymmetric configuration, but completely suppressed by the 180° outofphase bidipole. On the contrary, the even modes are easily induced by the 180° outof phase bidipole due to the symmetric configuration, but suppressed by the inphase one. For the case of φ = 90°, all the odd and even modes are induced, but the corresponding radiative and nonradiative powers are in between those for the cases of φ = 0° and φ = 180° bidipoles. Moreover, the radiative and nonradiative powers of bidipole interacting with GNR at these induced odd/even modes for cases of φ = 0/180° are nearly four times the corresponding values for the cases of a single dipole. In addition, because the radiative powers at the first and second modes dominate over the nonradiative ones, they belong to the bright modes at the far field. In contrast, the nonradiative powers at the third and fourth modes dominate over the radiative ones. This implies that these two higherorder modes are the dark modes. Through all of these plasmon modes, GNR exhibits the strong wavelength selectivity for the emission of emitters. The enhanced radiation and nonradiation occur only when the emission spectrum of QD overlaps with the specific plasmon mode of GNR. Compared to the other phase difference, the strongest emissions are induced by the inphase bidipole coupled to the odd modes and the 180° outofphase bidipole to the even modes, respectively.
The farfield radiation patterns, $\left\mathbf{E}\times \overline{\mathbf{H}}\xb7{\mathbf{e}}_{r}\right$ for $r>>\lambda $ versus angle, of the inphase bidipole at the first and third surface plasmon resonance modes and 180° outofphase bidipole at the second and fourth plasmon modes are shown in Figure 5a,c,b,d, respectively. The corresponding electric nearfield distributions are also shown for each mode, where the color bars are in logarithm scale. Note these radiation patterns are normalized by the maximum of the radiation pattern of a free dipole at the same r. From the radiation patterns, it is obvious that the first, second, third, and fourth modes of GNR correspond to the dipole, quadrupole, sextupole, and octupole modes, respectively. In particular, the pattern for the octupole mode is degenerated to have only four lobes, rather than eight, due to the ohmic loss in the GNR. Our results fully agree with [16]. Moreover, the distributions of the electric nearfield at each mode, particularly the relative positions of nodal points, are consistent with the results of silver nanowire measured by EELS [19, 20].
Furthermore, the wavelengths of the first, second, third, and fourth modes of GNR (a = 30 nm) versus AR (4 to 8) for n = 1.25 are plotted in Figure 6, which illustrate that these modes are redshifted as the AR of GNR increases. From the geometric viewpoint of nodal positions, the wavelength of the mth mode resonant standing wave in the GNR can be given by ${\lambda}_{\text{sp}}=2L/m\text{.}$ We define a ratio, α
Here m denotes the mth mode of GNR, and λ_{ m } is the corresponding wavelength in vacuum of the peak in the radiative and nonradiative spectra. The value α is then related to the velocity ratio of the surface plasmon wave in GNR to the light speed in the medium. In addition, the dispersion relations of nv_{p}/c and nv_{g}/c of GNW (a = 30 nm) versus wavelength are plotted in Figure 7a according to Equation 3. The α value of each longitudinal mode of GNR with different ARs (4 to 8) is also plotted for comparison. The results show that these modes of GNR exhibit a correlation to the dispersion relation of GNW. In addition, the decay length $\left(1/{k}^{\u2033}\right)$ of GNW and the apparent quantum yield, $\eta ={P}_{\text{r}}/({P}_{\text{r}}+{P}_{nr})$, of GNR (AR = 6, 7, 8) versus wavelength are shown in Figure 7b which illustrates that the tendency of the apparent quantum yields at these longitudinal modes of GNR are consistent with that of the decay length of GNW against the wavelength; the longer the wavelength, the larger the decay length and the apparent quantum yield are.
Moreover, the effect of the surrounding medium on these plasmon modes is studied. The wavelengths of the first, second, third, and fourth modes of GNR (a = 30 nm) versus the refractive index (n = 1 to 1.5) of the surrounding medium for AR = 8 are shown in Figure 8. It is obvious that these modes are redshifted as the refractive index of surrounding medium increases.
Conclusions
Our analysis shows that the two apexes of GNR are hotspots, as an elongated GNR is irradiated by a plane wave at the plasmon modes. The phenomenon can increase the probability of the simultaneous excitation of a pair of QDs at these apexes. Consequently, the coherent emission of the two excited QDs may occur subsequently. They were modeled as two emitters: bidipole with phase difference. The radiative power of the bidipole at the apexes of the GNR shows the efficient nanoantenna effect for the emission of QDs at the first and second longitudinal plasmon modes which correspond to the dipole and quadrupole modes. Because the first and second modes of an elongated GNR are in the NIR regime, these modes can be used for the optical communication. On the other hand, the higherorder modes (e.g. the third and fourth modes) of GNR show the darkmode behavior. Moreover, the odd modes are easily induced by the inphase bidipole, but fully suppressed by the 180° outofphase one. On the contrary, the even modes are induced by the 180° outofphase bidipole, but suppressed by the inphase one. Moreover, the strongest emissions are induced by the inphase bidipole coupled to the odd modes, and the 180° outofphase one to the even modes, respectively. Summarily, the plasmon modes of GNR can enhance the simultaneous excitation and coherent emission of a pair of QDs.
These longitudinal plasmon modes of GNR are tunable by adjusting the AR as well as the permittivity of the surrounding medium. In addition, these modes of GNR are consistent with the dispersion relation of GNW. Our preliminary study shows the possibility of using an elongated GNR associated with two QDs at the ends as a subwavelength FabryPerot resonator [10] and might provide further insights for the nanorod spaser [16, 30] and quantum optics [2, 3]. Our analysis could be useful for the plasmonic applications in a variety of rapidly growing fields, e.g., surface enhanced fluorescence [25, 26, 31–33].
Abbreviations
 ACS:

absorption cross section
 AR:

aspect ratio
 ECS:

extinction cross section
 EELS:

electric energy loss spectroscopy
 GNR:

gold nanorod
 GNW:

gold nanowire
 MMP:

multiple multipole
 NIR:

nearinfrared
 QD:

quantum dot
 SCS:

scattering cross section.
References
 1.
Fedutik Y, Temnov VV, Schops O, Woggon U, Artemyev MV: Excitonplasmonphoton conversion in plasmonic nanostructures. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 99: 136802.
 2.
Akimov AV, Mukherjee A, Yu CL, Chang DE, Zibrov AS, Hemmer PR, Park H, Lukin MD: Efficient generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots. Nature 2007, 450: 402–406. 10.1038/nature06230
 3.
Kolesov R, Grotz B, Balasubramanian G, Stöhr RJ, Nicolet AAL, Hemmer PR, Jelezko F, Wrachtrup J: Waveparticle duality of single surface plasmon polaritons. Nat Phys 2009, 5: 470–474. 10.1038/nphys1278
 4.
Sanders AW, Routenberg DA, Wiley BJ, Xia Y, Dufresne ER, Reed MA: Observation of plasmon propagation, redirection, and fanout in silver nanowires. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 1822–1826. 10.1021/nl052471v
 5.
Schider G, Krenn JR, Hohenau A, Ditlbacher H, Leitner A, Aussenegg FR, Schaich WL, Puscasu I, Monacelli B, Boreman G: Plasmon dispersion relation of Au and Ag nanowires. Phys Rev B 2003, 68: 155427.
 6.
Ditlbacher H, Hohenau A, Wagner D, Kreibig U, Rogers M, Hofer F, Aussenegg FR, Krenn JR: Silver nanowires as surface plasmon resonators. Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95: 257403.
 7.
Wild B, Cao L, Sun Y, Khanal BP, Zubarev ER, Gray SK, Scherer NF, Pelton M: Propagation lengths and group velocities of plasmons in chemically synthesized gold and silver nanowires. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 472–482. 10.1021/nn203802e
 8.
Encina ER, Perassi EM, Coronado EA: Nearfield enhancement of multipole plasmon resonances in Ag and Au nanowires. J Phys Chem A 2009, 113: 4489–4497. 10.1021/jp811089a
 9.
Shegai T, Huang Y, Xu H, Käll M: Coloring fluorescence emission with silver nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 103114. 10.1063/1.3355545
 10.
Cubukcu E, Capasso F: Optical nanorod antennas as dispersive onedimensional FabryPérot resonators for surface plasmons. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 201101. 10.1063/1.3262947
 11.
Bok HM, Shuford KL, Kim S, Kim SK, Park S: Multiple surface plasmon modes for a colloidal solution of nanoporous gold nanorods and their comparison to smooth gold nanorods. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 2265–2270. 10.1021/nl800924r
 12.
Chau YF, Chen MW, Tsai DP: Threedimensional analysis of surface plasmon resonance modes on a gold nanorod. Appl Opt 2009, 48: 617–622. 10.1364/AO.48.000617
 13.
Yang ZJ, Zhang ZS, Zhang LH, Li QQ, Hao ZH, Wang QQ: Fano resonances in dipolequadrupole plasmon coupling nanorod dimers. Opt Lett 2011, 36: 1542–1544. 10.1364/OL.36.001542
 14.
Biagioni P, Huang JS, Hecht B: Nanoantennas for visible and infrared radiation. Rep Prog Phys 2012, 75: 024402. 10.1088/00344885/75/2/024402
 15.
Dorfmuller J, Vogelgesang R, Khunsin W, Rockstuhl C, Etrich C, Kern K: Plasmonic nanowire antennas: experiment, simulation and theory. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 3596–3603. 10.1021/nl101921y
 16.
Taminiau TH, Stefani FD, van Hulst NF: Optical nanorod antennas modeled as cavities for dipolar emitters: evolution of sub and superradiant modes. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 1020–1024. 10.1021/nl103828n
 17.
Schaffer B, Hohenester U, Trügler A, Hofer F: Highresolution surface plasmon imaging of gold nanoparticles by energyfiltered transmission electron microscopy. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 041401.
 18.
N'Gom M, Ringnalda J, Mansfield JF, Agarwal A, Kotov N, Zaluzec NJ, Norris TB: Single particle plasmon spectroscopy of silver nanowires and gold nanorods. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3200–3204. 10.1021/nl801504v
 19.
Nicoletti O, Wubs M, Mortensen NA, Sigle W, van Aken PA, Midgley PA: Surface plasmon modes of a single silver nanorod: an electron energy loss study. Opt Express 2011, 19: 15371–15379. 10.1364/OE.19.015371
 20.
Rossouw D, Couillard M, Vickery J, Kumacheva E, Botton GA: Multipolar plasmonic resonances in silver nanowire antennas imaged with a subnanometer electron probe. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 1499–1504. 10.1021/nl200634w
 21.
Fu Y, Zhang J, Lakowicz JR: Plasmonenhanced fluorescence from single fluorophores endlinked to gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 5540–5541. 10.1021/ja9096237
 22.
He Y, Zhu KD: Strong coupling among semiconductor quantum dots induced by a metal nanoparticle. Nano Res Lett 2012, 7: 95. 10.1186/1556276X795
 23.
Johnson PB, Christy RW: Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 1972, 6: 4370–4379. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370
 24.
Hafner C: The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics. Boston: Artech House; 1991.
 25.
Liaw JW, Tsai HY: Theoretical investigation of plasmonic enhancement of silicacoated gold nanorod on molecular fluorescence. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2012, 113: 470–479. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.12.015
 26.
Liaw JW, Tsai HY, Huang CH: Sizedependent surface enhanced fluorescence of gold nanorod: enhancement or quenching. Plasmonics 2012, 7(3):543–553. 10.1007/s1146801293419
 27.
Stratton JA: Electromagnetic Theory. New York: McGrawHill; 1941.
 28.
Takahara J, Yamagishi S, Taki H, Morimoto A, Kobayashi T: Guiding of a onedimensional optical beam with nanometer diameter. Opt Lett 1997, 22: 475–477. 10.1364/OL.22.000475
 29.
Liaw JW, Wang JK: Dispersion relation of plasmon wave in metallic nanowires. Scanning 2004, 26: 106–108.
 30.
Bergman DJ, Stockman MI: Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems. Phys Rev Lett 2003, 90: 027402.
 31.
Wu J, Mangham SC, Reddy VR, Manasreh MO, Weaver BD: Surface plasmon enhanced intermediate band based quantum dots solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012, 102: 44–49.
 32.
Long M, Jiang J, Li Y, Cao R, Zhang L, Cai W: Effect of gold nanoparticles on the photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance of Au modified BiVO4. NanoMicro Lett 2011, 3(3):171–177.
 33.
Shrivastava S, Dash D: Labelfree colorimetric estimation of proteins using nanoparticles of silver. NanoMicro Lett 2010, 2: 164–168.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under grant numbers NSC 992221E182030MY3, NSC 1002221E002041MY2 and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital of Taiwan under grant CMRPD 290042.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
JWL calculated dispersion relation of GNW and drafted the manuscript. CHH and BRC calculated EM field using MMP method and plotted the figures. MKK developed the MMP code, revised the manuscript, and approved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liaw, J., Huang, C., Chen, B. et al. Subwavelength FabryPerot resonator: a pair of quantum dots incorporated with gold nanorod. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 546 (2012) doi:10.1186/1556276X7546
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Gold nanorod
 Quantum dot
 Longitudinal plasmon mode
 FabryPerot resonator
 Radiative power
 Nonradiative power
 Gold nanowire
 Bidipole