Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Valence band offset of β-Ga2O3/wurtzite GaN heterostructure measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:562

  • Received: 28 August 2012
  • Accepted: 24 September 2012
  • Published:


A sample of the β-Ga2O3/wurtzite GaN heterostructure has been grown by dry thermal oxidation of GaN on a sapphire substrate. X-ray diffraction measurements show that the β-Ga2O3 layer was formed epitaxially on GaN. The valence band offset of the β-Ga2O3/wurtzite GaN heterostructure is measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It is demonstrated that the valence band of the β-Ga2O3/GaN structure is 1.40 ± 0.08 eV.


  • β-Ga2O3/wurtzite GaN heterostructure
  • Band offset
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


GaN has been used in many applications including field-effect transistors and high-electron mobility transistors [1, 2]. However, the power-handling capability of these devices is limited by the leakage current through the Schottky gate. To solve this problem, GaN-based metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) or metal-insulator-semiconductor structures are being widely investigated. Ga2O3 can be used as the gate dielectric medium for GaN-based MOS devices to suppress the gate leakage current [3]. Because gallium oxide can crystallize in monoclinic crystalline form (β-Ga2O3) in the process of fabricating a β-Ga2O3/GaN-based MOS structure, the β-Ga2O3 layer can be formed on GaN epitaxially. In this case, the β-Ga2O3 layer can be formed as an oxide (insulator) layer with a certain crystalline structure within the MOS structure. Apart from the crystalline quality of the Ga2O3 layer, the band parameters, such as band offsets, also play an important role in the current transport mechanism. These parameters determine the barrier for hole or electron transport across the interface. There is a similar influence to that on the current transport mechanism in a β-Ga2O3/GaN dual-color photodetector [4].

The growth and structural characterization of Ga2O3/GaN heterostructures by dry thermal oxidation on GaN have been reported extensively [57]. However, to date, the band alignment of the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure has not yet been determined experimentally. In this paper, the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructures were fabricated by a thermal process method. Because the Ga2O3 can be grown epitaxially on GaN, the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure with the epitaxial relationship between the Ga2O3 and GaN layers allows us to evaluate the band offset of the heterostructure. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a powerful tool for measurement of the valence band offsets (VBOs) of heterostructures. Experimental measurements of the VBO for the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure by XPS were conducted, and the conduction band offset (CBO) was also calculated. These measurements are important for understanding the current transport mechanism of Ga2O3/GaN-based electronic devices.


To measure the VBO values, three samples were used: a 6-μm-thick GaN layer grown on a c-plane sapphire substrate as sample I, a 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 layer on a GaN template as sample II, and an approximately 5-nm-thick Ga2O3 layer on a GaN template as sample III. The GaN samples were grown on c-plane (0001) sapphire substrates by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Trimethylgallium and blue ammonia were used as the Ga and N sources, respectively, for MOCVD growth. In our experiments, the GaN sample was thermally oxidized in a 600 ml/min oxygen ambient for 10 min at 900°C, and an approximately 5-nm-thick Ga2O3 layer was obtained on the GaN surface. The GaN sample was thermally oxidized in the same condition but for 8 h, and a 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 layer was obtained on the GaN surface. The GaN thin-film surface has a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 0.3 nm as revealed by AFM. The RMS roughness of the approximately 5-nm-thick Ga2O3 layer surface is 2.7 nm. The Ga2O3 thickness was measured by XPS, and the Ga2O3 crystal structures were characterized using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) apparatus. The XRD measurements were carried out using an X'Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (CuKα radiation; PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) with an X'Celerator detector. The XRD patterns were then refined using the HighScore Plus (PANalytical B.V.) and FullProf software packages. The XPS measurements were performed at room temperature using a PHI Quantera SXM instrument (Physical Electronics GmbH, Ismaning, Germany) with AlKα (hv = 1486.6 eV) as the X-ray radiation source, which had been carefully calibrated based on the work function and the Fermi level (EF). The total energy resolution of this XPS system is approximately 0.5 eV, and the accuracy of the observed binding energy is within 0.03 eV after careful calibration [8]. Before taking the measurements, the XPS apparatus is calibrated by fitting to the Fermi edge of an Ar+-bombarded silver sample. The accuracy of the observed binding energy (368.26 ± 0.03 eV for Ag 3d5/2) is within 0.03 eV. When the sample is measured, a large number of electrons are excited and emitted from the sample, so the sample is always positively charged and the resulting electric field can affect the measured kinetic energy of the photoelectrons. A low-energy electron flood gun was used to achieve charge compensation, and all of the XPS spectra were calibrated using the C1s peak at 284.8 eV from contamination to compensate for the charge effect. In order to avoid the pernicious effect of surface contamination on the XPS measurement of the Ga2O3/GaN heterojunction, an Ar+ bombardment with a voltage of 1 kV at a low sputtering rate of 0.5 nm/min was carried out.

Results and discussion

According to the results of the XRD measurements, peaks from the (−201), (−402), and (−603) planes of β-Ga2O3 and the (002) plane of wurtzite GaN were observed in sample III, as shown in Figure 1. The epitaxial relationships were found to be (−201) β-Ga2O3//(002) wurtzite GaN.
Figure 1
Figure 1

XRD pattern of β-Ga 2 O 3 formed on a GaN template for sample III.

From the theory first introduced by Kraut [9], for the β-Ga2O3/wurtzite GaN heterostructure, the VBO (ΔEv) value can be calculated from the following formula:
Δ E V = Δ E CL E O 1 s Ga 2 O 3 E VBM Ga 2 O 3 + E N 1 s GaN E VBM GaN
where Δ E CL = E O 1 s Ga 2 O 3 E N 1 s GaN is the energy difference between the N1s and O1s core levels in GaN and Ga2O3, which can be measured from the sample Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure that was prepared by growing the approximately 5-nm β-Ga2O3 layer on the GaN template. E O 1 s Ga 2 O 3 E VBM Ga 2 O 3 is the energy difference between Ga2O3 O1s and the valence band maximum (VBM) in the Ga2O3 thick film, and EN 1sGaN − E VBM GaN is the energy difference between GaN N1s and the VBM in the GaN thick film. Similarly, the Ga 3d spectra of both Ga2O3 and GaN can also be used to calculate the VBO of the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure. The related data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

XPS core-level spectra curve-fitting results and VBM positions used to calculate VBO of the Ga 2 O 3 /GaN heterostructure



Binding energy (eV)




Ga 3d






















Ga Auger




Ga Auger






























FWHM, full width at half maximum.

Figure 2a,b,h gives the core level of N1s, the valence band edge (VBE) spectra, and the core level of Ga3d recorded from a 6-μm-thick GaN film, respectively. Figure 2c,d,i displays the core level of O1s, the VBE spectra, and the core level of Ga3d recorded from a 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 film, respectively. Figure 2e,f,g shows the core level of N1s, O1s, and Ga3d recorded from the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure sample, respectively. All core level peaks were fitted using a Shirley background and Voigt (mixed Lorentzian-Gaussian) line shapes. The VBM positions in the VB spectra were determined by linear extrapolation of the leading edges of the VB spectra to the base lines to account for any instrument resolution-induced tails. The peak parameters and the VBM positions from Figure 2 are shown in Table 1 for clarity [10].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Core levels and VBE spectra. (a) Core level of N1s recorded in a 6-μm-thick GaN film. (b) The VBE spectra from the 6-μm-thick GaN film. (c) Core level of O1s recorded in a 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 film. (d) The VBE spectra of the 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 film. (e) Core level of N1s recorded on the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure sample. (f) Core level of O1s recorded on the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure sample. (g) Core level of Ga3d recorded on the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure sample. (h) Core level of Ga3d recorded in a 6-μm-thick GaN film. (i) Core level of O1s recorded in a 200-nm-thick Ga2O3 film.

In Figure 2a,e, the N1s peaks in both the GaN and Ga2O3/GaN samples have quite asymmetrical shapes and consist of three components. The two lower binding energy components are associated with the Ga Auger peaks [11, 12], and the higher binding energy component is considered to be from Ga-N bonding.

As shown in Table 1, the energy difference between N1s and the VBM of the GaN film (EN 1sGaN − E VBM GaN) is 394.96 eV, the energy difference between O1s and the VBM of the Ga2O3 film E O 1 s Ga 2 O 3 E VBM Ga 2 O 3 is 528.05 eV, and the energy difference between the N1s and O1s core levels in GaN and Ga2O3, Δ E CL = E O 1 s Ga 2 O 3 E N 1 s GaN , is 134.34 eV. The Ga2O3/GaN VBO is therefore 1.25 ± 0.08 eV for the O1s-N1s combination.

As shown in Table 1, the energy difference between N1s and the VBM of the GaN film (EN 1sGaN − E VBM GaN) is 394.96 eV, which is consistent with the data reported by Sato et al. [13]. Similarly, the energy difference between Ga3d and the VBM of the GaN film (EGa 3dGaN − E VBM GaN) is 17.67 eV, which agrees with the results of Craft et al. [14]. Similarly, the energy difference between Ga3d and the VBM of the Ga2O3 film E G a 3 d Ga 2 O 3 E VBM Ga 2 O 3 is 17.12 eV, which is in accordance with the results reported by Hui et al. [15]. Table 2 lists the VBO values determined by substituting the values in Table 1 into a similar formula to Equation 1 using different combinations of the XPS core levels. The average Ga2O3/GaN VBO is 1.40 ± 0.08 eV for the four combinations. The CBO can then be calculated using the formula Δ E c = E g Ga 2 O 3 E g GaN Δ E v . The bandgap of Ga2O3 is 4.90 eV, as reported elsewhere [16]. Similarly, the bandgap of GaN is 3.40 eV [17]. The energy band diagram of the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure is therefore determined at room temperature, with a CBO of 0.10 ± 0.08 eV, as shown in Figure 3.
Table 2

VBOs calculated for the Ga 2 O 3 /GaN heterostructure using different combinations of the XPS core levels










The errors in the VBOs are ±0.08 eV.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Energy band diagram of Ga 2 O 3 /GaN heterostructure at room temperature.


In summary, β-Ga2O3 films have been grown on a wurtzite GaN underlayer with an epitaxial relationship of β-Ga2O3 (−201)//wurtzite GaN (002). The VBO of the β-Ga2O3 (−201)/wurtzite GaN (002) heterostructure has been measured by XPS to be 1.40 ± 0.08 eV, with a corresponding CBO of 0.10 ± 0.08 eV from the calculation. Accurate determination of the VBO of GaN/Ga2O3 is critical for the design and application of Ga2O3/GaN-based electronic and optoelectronic devices [18].



This work was supported by the National Key Basic R&D Plan (973 Project) of China (Grant nos. 2012CB619301 and 2012CB619306).

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Artificial Microstructure and Microscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, People's Republic of China
Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 912, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China


  1. Yoshida S, Suzuki J: High-temperature reliability of GaN metal semiconductor field-effect transistor and bipolar junction transistor. J Appl. Phys 1999, 85: 7931. 10.1063/1.370610View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chini A, Esposto M, Meneghesso G, Zanoni E: Evaluation of GaN HEMT degradation by means of pulsed IV, leakage and DLTS measurements. Electronics Letters Vol 2009, 45: 8.Google Scholar
  3. Lee C-T: Metal–oxide–semiconductor devices using Ga2O3 dielectrics on n-type GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett 2003, 82: 4304. 10.1063/1.1584520View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Weng WY, Hsueh TJ, Chang SJ, Huang GJ, Hsueh HT: A high-responsivity GaN nanowire UV photodetector. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters. 2011, 23: 7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wolter D, Luther BP, Waltemyer DL, Onnby C, Mohney SE, Molnar RJ: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction study of the thermal oxide on gallium nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett 1997, 70: 2156. 10.1063/1.118944View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim H, Park SJ, Hwang H: Thermally oxidized GaN film for use as gate insulators. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2001, 19: 579. 10.1116/1.1349733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Watkins NJ, Wicks GW, Gao Y: Oxidation study of GaN using x-ray photoemission spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett 1999, 75: 2602. 10.1063/1.125091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shi K, DBLi HP, Song Y, Guo J, Wang X, Wang XQX, Liu JM, Yang AL, Wei HY, Zhang B, Yang SY, Liu XL, Zhu QS, Wang ZG: Determination of InN/diamond heterojunction band offset by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 50.Google Scholar
  9. Kraut EA, Grant RW, Waldrop JR, Kowalczyk SP: Semiconductor core-level to valence-band maximum binding-energy differences: precise determination by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 1965, 1983: 28.Google Scholar
  10. Hong SK, Hanada T, Makino H, Chen Y, Ko HJ, Yao T, Tanaka A, Sasaki H, Sato S: Band alignment at a ZnO/GaN (0001) heterointerface. Appl. Phys. Lett 2001, 78: 3349. 10.1063/1.1372339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta SK, Wu H-H, Kwak KJ, Casal P, Nicholson TR, Wen X, Anisha R, Bhusan B, Berger PR, Wu L, Brillson LJ, Lee SC: Interfacial design and structure of protein/polymer films on oxidized AlGaN surfaces. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 2011, 44: 034010. 10.1088/0022-3727/44/3/034010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moldovan G, Harrison I, Roe M, Brown PD: Effects of KOH etching on the properties of Ga-polar n-GaN surfaces. Philosophical Magazine 2006, 86: 16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sato H, Sarkarf MR, Naoi Y, Sakai S: XPS measurement of valence band discontinuity at GaP/GaN heterointerfaces. Solid-State Electronics 1997, 41: 205–207. 10.1016/S0038-1101(96)00167-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Craft HS, Collazo R, Losego MD, Mita S, Sitar Z, Maria JP: Band offsets and growth mode of molecular beam epitaxy grown MgO (111) on GaN (0002) by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett 2007, 102: 074104.Google Scholar
  15. Chang S-H, Chen Z-Z, Huang W, Liu XC, Chen BY, Li ZZ, Shi EW: Band alignment of Ga[sub 2]O[sub 3]/6H-SiC heterojunction. Chin. Phys. B 2011, 11: 116101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Orita M, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H: Deep-ultraviolet transparent conductive beta-Ga[sub 2]O[sub 3] thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett 2000, 77: 4166. 10.1063/1.1330559View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Akazawa M, Matsuyama T, Hashizume T, Hiroki M, Yamahata S, Shigekawa N: Small valence-band offset of InAlN/GaN heterostructure grown by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett 2010, 96: 132104. 10.1063/1.3368689View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Weng GE, Ling AK, Lv XQ, Zhang JY, Zhang BP: III-Nitride-based quantum dots and their optoelectronic applications. Nano-Micro Lett 2011, 3: 200–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Wei et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.