Skip to main content

InGaN/GaN multilayer quantum dots yellow-green light-emitting diode with optimized GaN barriers


InGaN/GaN multilayer quantum dot (QD) structure is a potential type of active regions for yellow-green light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The surface morphologies and crystalline quality of GaN barriers are critical to the uniformity of InGaN QD layers. While GaN barriers were grown in multi-QD layers, we used improved growth parameters by increasing the growth temperature and switching the carrier gas from N2 to H2 in the metal organic vapor phase epitaxy. As a result, a 10-layer InGaN/GaN QD LED is demonstrated successfully. The transmission electron microscopy image shows the uniform multilayer InGaN QDs clearly. As the injection current increases from 5 to 50 mA, the electroluminescence peak wavelength shifts from 574 to 537 nm.


In recent years, white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have attracted much attention for applications in general lighting and liquid crystal display back-lighting [1, 2]. White LEDs based on red, green, and blue LED chips exhibit higher color rendering index and higher luminous efficiency limit simultaneously, which is theoretically superior to the solution of blue LED plus yellow phosphor [3]. However, the performance of RGB white LEDs fails to meet expectation due to the well-known ‘green gap’ [46]. Additionally, in the spectral range of green gap, the efficiency of yellow-green LEDs decreases dramatically compared to that of short-wavelength green LEDs [7]. This is attributed to the low internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of InGaN/GaN multi-quantum wells (MQWs) with high indium composition. The dislocations and defects induced by the large lattice mismatch between InGaN and GaN act as nonradiative recombination centers, thus weakening the IQE [8]. Furthermore, the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) of high-In-content InGaN/GaN MQWs leads to energy band tilting, which decreases the overlap integral of electrons and holes by spatial separation [912]. To circumvent the above disadvantages, various approaches are adopted, such as InGaN quantum dots (QDs) grown as the alternative active region [13, 14] and InGaN QWs grown on nonpolar or semipolar planes [6, 15]. In previous reports, growth behaviors of high-In-content InGaN quantum dots using a growth interruption method are intensively investigated [1620], which paves the way to high-efficiency QD LEDs. As the capping layer of InGaN QDs, GaN barrier is critical to the performance of multilayer InGaN QDs. Previous literature indicates that GaN barrier exhibits a rough surface when grown under the same parameters as the InGaN QDs, which will influence the QD formation and distribution of different layers [21]. Thus, it is necessary to optimize the growth parameters of the GaN barrier layer in multilayer InGaN/GaN QD structure. Some GaN barrier growth approaches are believed to improve the structural properties of InGaN/GaN QD or QW structure, such as the growth of GaN barrier at higher temperature [22, 23], using H2 as carrier gas in GaN barrier growth [22, 24, 25], and growth interruption after QW growth [24, 26]. In this study, samples of InGaN QDs with GaN barrier layer structure have been grown by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) with different growth parameters. It is shown that the surface morphology of the GaN barrier layer is improved by increasing the growth temperature and switching the carrier gas from N2 to H2. Based on the optimized growth parameters, a yellow-green LED including 10-layer InGaN/GaN QDs is successfully fabricated. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image indicates a uniform multilayer InGaN QD structure clearly. The electroluminescence peak of the LED shows a blueshift from 574 to 537 nm as the current increases from 5 to 50 mA.


All samples in this study were grown on (0001) sapphire substrates in an AIXTRON 2000HT MOVPE system. Four samples, labeled as A, B, C, and D, were prepared to investigate the growth parameters of GaN barrier layers. For sample A, the substrate was thermally cleaned by H2 gas at 1,060°C for 10 min as usual. After that, a 30-nm GaN buffer layer was deposited at 530°C followed by a 2-μm GaN bulk layer grown at 1,040°C. The reactor temperature was then decreased to 650°C, and N2 was used as the carrier gas in place of H2 for InGaN QD growth. A single layer of InGaN QDs was grown by the growth interruption method [17, 19, 20], which included the first nominal 1.5-nm InGaN film growth and the following 20-s growth interruption. The flow rates of triethylgallium and trimethylindium were 1.69 × 10−5 mol/min and 2.07 × 10−5 mol/min, respectively, while the flow rate of NH3 was 0.625 mol/min with nitrogen as the carrier gas, corresponding to a V/III ratio of approximately 16,600. Compared with sample A, samples B, C, and D all added a 30-nm GaN capping layer, but they were distinguished by the growth parameters, which were listed in Table 1. During the GaN barrier layer growth process of sample B, the carrier gas and temperature are kept the same as those for the growth of InGaN QDs. While in the first 1 min of the GaN barrier growth of sample C, the same carrier gas and temperature as in the InGaN QD growth were used in order to maintain the QD structure. Then, the carrier gas is switched to H2. Also, sample D not only switches the carrier gas to H2 and but also increases the growth temperature to 760°C in 1 min and a half. Using the growth parameters of sample D, a yellow-green LED including 10-layer InGaN/GaN QDs as the active region was grown, which was labeled as sample E. The active region was sandwiched between a 4-μm n-GaN bulk layer and the p-AlGaN (30 nm)/p-GaN (160 nm) layers. Figure 1 shows the whole profile of temperature changing and carrier gas switching in the growth process. During the whole growth process of the GaN barrier, only the In precursor was shut off, while the same fluxes as in the growth of InGaN QDs were maintained for the Ga and N precursors. To compare the optimized growth parameters, sample F was grown with a five-layer InGaN/GaN QD structure in which the GaN capping layer was grown at the InGaN growth temperature with nitrogen as ambient.

Table 1 Growth parameters of samples B, C, and D
Figure 1
figure 1

Parameters used in growing a single InGaN QD and GaN barrier period in sample E. Regions indicating the different growth periods: I, InGaN QD; II, growth interruption; III, protective GaN barrier; IV, temperature ramping and gas switching; V, GaN barrier; VI, temperature decreasing and gas switching; VII, InGaN QD.

The surface morphologies of samples A, B, C, and D were measured by PSIA X-100 atomic force microscope (AFM). The QD density and average diameter and height were calculated by the Scanning Probe Image Processor software. The cross section of sample E was observed at 200 kV by Tecnai G20 TEM system. For Z-contrast imaging of sample F, JEOL-2010F equipped with a high-angle annular dark-field detector for scanning TEM was used. The photoluminescence (PL) of samples B, C, D, and E was measured using a 325-nm He-Cd laser as the excitation source. The excitation light spot diameter was 1 mm, and the excitation optical power was 27 mW. Sample E was then processed into 300 × 300-μm2 chips. The n-GaN is exposed by etching with inductively coupled Cl2/BCl3/Ar2 plasma. Ni/Au was deposited on the transparent electrodes, and the transparent electrodes were annealed at 600°C for 3 min in oxygen ambient. Cr/Au was deposited on the n-GaN layer and p-GaN layer as n- and p-electrodes.

Results and discussion

The AFM images of samples A, B, C, and D are shown in Figure 2. The InGaN QDs can be observed clearly in sample A. The diameter and height distribution histogram of sample A are depicted in Figure 3a,b, and the diameter, height, and density statistics are 73.5 nm, 5.1 nm, and 2.0 × 109 cm−2. However, when a GaN capping layer was stacked on sample A, the surface exhibits a different appearance under different growth parameters. The surface of sample B shows hillock shapes. This is attributed to the unoptimized growth parameters. When GaN barrier is grown at 650°C, the Ga atoms might not have enough energy to migrate to the proper area at low temperature [27, 28]. Using N2 instead of H2 as carrier gas, the density of gas molecules increased near the reaction surface, which leads to decreased surface diffusion length of the reactants [29]. By decreasing the flow rate of N2 and increasing that of H2, the density of gas molecules decreased near the reaction surface, which leads to increased surface diffusion length of the reactants [29]. Thus, the surface morphology of sample C is improved compared to that of sample B. Furthermore, by increasing the growth temperature, the morphology of sample D becomes much smoother. This is because Ga atoms might have enough energy for migration as the temperature increases [27, 28]. The root mean roughness decreases from samples B to D in Figure 2b,c,d, which confirms the above analysis.

Figure 2
figure 2

AFM images (a, b, c, d) of samples A, B, C, and D (5 × 5 μm2). The root mean square roughness of samples B, C, and D are 1.937, 1.815, and 0.416 nm, respectively.

Figure 3
figure 3

Diameter (a) and height (b) distribution histogram of sample A.

The room-temperature PL spectra of samples B, C, and D are shown in Figure 4. Sample D has the highest PL intensity among the three samples, while sample B has a rather weak PL intensity. It confirms the improved crystalline quality when using H2 as ambient and higher growth temperature for the GaN barrier. In many literatures, the etching effect of In content has been reported when using H2 as carrier gas in the reactor [29, 30]. H2 is known to eliminate the In-rich clusters in the InGaN QD/GaN barrier interface, thus decreasing the average In content. The PL peak wavelength shows blueshift from sample B to sample D, which confirms the H2 effect in the GaN barrier growth. Due to the lattice mismatch between InGaN and GaN, the decrease of In-rich clusters will benefit the crystalline quality of the GaN barrier layer. Thus, the crystalline quality is improved with changing the carrier gas from nitrogen to hydrogen during GaN barrier layer growth, which confirms the result of the previous reports [22].

Figure 4
figure 4

PL spectra of samples B, C, and D at room temperature.

The cross-sectional TEM image of sample E is shown in Figure 5. The 10-layer uniform QDs and the flat surface of the GaN barrier layer can be observed clearly. This result validates the growth method mentioned above. The average QD diameter and height of sample A and sample E are listed in Table 2. These two samples correspond to the single-layer and multilayer InGaN QDs. It proves that InGaN QDs maintain the three-dimensional nanostructure during the multilayer growth. The average diameter and height for the 10-layer QD structure is smaller to some extent than those of the single-layer QD sample. H2 ambient and elevated temperature induce partial decomposition of InGaN [30, 31], which is more pronounced for the 10-layer QD sample than the single-layer one. Meanwhile, the oblique angle of the TEM image should be taken into account, which may cause the average diameter and height to be distorted to some extent. Considering the above factors, these data are consistent with those of single QD layer measured with AFM.

Figure 5
figure 5

Cross-sectional TEM image of samples E. The inset shows the details of the multilayer InGaN/GaN structure.

Table 2 The comparison of QD diameter and height between samples A and E

The GaN barrier layer of sample F was grown at the InGaN growth temperature and using nitrogen as carrier gas. Z-contrast imaging is known to be sensitive to composition, which indicates that the brighter regions respond to the In-rich regions. Thus, the cross-section TEM image of sample F indicates that the surface morphology of the GaN barrier layer is rather rough in Figure 6. It will influence the uniformity and morphology of InGaN QDs in different layers. On the other hand, the GaN barrier layer of sample E was grown at higher temperature and using hydrogen as carrier gas. According to the TEM image, the sizes of the QDs in different layers were fairly uniform. Compared with sample F, based on the flat GaN barrier layer grown at higher temperature and with hydrogen as carrier gas, every InGaN layer can be grown on a similar surface, which provides the same QD formation parameters for every InGaN layer. In order to protect the InGaN QD structure, a nominal 1.5-nm GaN capping layer with the same temperature was grown on top of the QDs in sample E. In Figure 1, the mentioned nominal 1.5-nm GaN capping layer was grown in period III, whose growth parameters are the same with the growth carrier gas and temperature of InGaN QDs. It serves as a protective layer to maintain three-dimensional nanostructures, which are presented initially. The InGaN QD growth temperature is lower than that of the InGaN QWs, for example, QWs are grown by a “two-temperature” method [32]. As known, the decomposition of InGaN was suppressed in relatively low temperature. In particular, the GaN barrier growth temperature of sample E is lower than that of the QW samples. In conclusion, the influence of increased temperature on QD dimension is not significant in our experiments. We think that it is different from the QW growth parameters which lead to decomposition, due to the relatively low growth temperature during the whole process and the thin GaN protective film layer.

Figure 6
figure 6

Cross-section TEM image of samples F. The inset shows the details of the multilayer InGaN/GaN structure.

The PL spectra depending on the temperature of sample E are plotted in Figure 7a. Figure 7b summarizes the temperature dependencies of PL peak energy. The redshift of the PL peak from 15 to 250 K is less than 10 meV, while it is more than 30 meV in InGaN bulk or InGaN QW, as reported in references [33, 34]. In a previous report about the optical properties of QDs [35], as the temperature increases, carriers can easily thermally transfer into low-energy states from high-energy states. The small redshift observed in our samples may be due to the combined effect of bandgap shift with increasing temperature and carrier redistribution among different QDs. Detailed interpretation of the phenomenon will be left as the topic for future work.

Figure 7
figure 7

Temperature-dependent PL spectra. (a) PL spectra of sample E at different temperatures. (b) Temperature-dependent peak energy.

In addition, micro-PL at low temperature shows a sharp peak from single QDs with the same QD growth parameters in our previous reports [16, 36]. Based on the micro-PL measurements, we believe that the optical properties of our samples reflect the quantum confinement effect in the InGaN quantum dots.

The electroluminescence (EL) test results of sample E are shown in Figure 8. As the injection current increases from 5 to 50 mA, the peak wavelength shifts from 574 to 537 nm. The mechanism of EL blueshift may be likely attributed to the carrier screening of QCSE [37]. However, this amount of blueshift is comparable to that of yellow-green LEDs grown on semipolar planes [6]. This means that the QCSE in the QDs is partially suppressed. As the diameter of the QDs is relatively large compared with the height, further reduction of the QCSE can be expected if the aspect ratio becomes larger. The output power is estimated to be 1 mW at a driving current of 50 mA by on-wafer measurements using a calibrated photodiode.

Figure 8
figure 8

EL spectra of sample E under different injection currents at room temperature. The upper inset is the EL image of sample E at 50 mA. The lower inset shows the injection current dependence of the peak wavelength and FWHM of the EL spectra.


In summary, by increasing the growth temperature and switching the carrier gas to H2, the surface morphology and crystalline quality of GaN barrier layer have been optimized. Compared to the different GaN barrier growth parameters, hydrogen eliminating effect is confirmed by PL results. During the multi-InGaN QD growth, the three-dimensional nanostructure was maintained due to the thin GaN protective layer and relative growth temperature of InGaN QDs and GaN barrier. Based on the optimized growth parameters, a 10-layer InGaN/GaN QD yellow-green LED is successfully grown by MOVPE. The EL wavelength shows a blueshift from 574 to 537 nm as injection current increases from 5 to 50 mA.


  1. Mueller-Mach R, Meuller G, Krames M, Trottier T: High-power phosphor-converted light-emitting diodes based on III-Nitrides. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 2002, 8: 339. 10.1109/2944.999189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chua SJ, Soh CB, Liu W, Teng JH, Ang SS, Teo SL: Quantum dots excited InGaN/GaN phosphor-free white LEDs. Phys Status Solidi C 2008, 5(No. 6):2189. 10.1002/pssc.200778535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berns RS: Designing white-light LED lighting for the display of art: a feasibility study. Color Res Appl 2011, 36: 324. 10.1002/col.20633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krames MR, Shchekin OB, Mueller-Mach R, Mueller GO, Zhou L, Harbers G, Craford MG: Status and future of high-power light-emitting diodes for solid-state lighting. J Display Technol 2007, 3: 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park I-K, Kwon M-K, Kim J-O, Seo S-B, Kim J-Y, Lim J-H, Park S-J: Green light-emitting diodes with self-assembled In-rich InGaN quantum Dots. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 133105. 10.1063/1.2790783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto S, Zhao Y, Pan C-C, Chung RB, Fujito K, Sonoda J, Den Baars SP, Nakamura S: High-efficiency single-quantum-well green and yellow-green light-emitting diodes on semipolar (2021) GaN substrates. Applied Physics Express 2010, 3: 122102. 10.1143/APEX.3.122102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feezell DF, Schmidt MC, Den Baars SP, Nakamura S: Development of nonpolar and semipolar InGaN/GaN visible light-emitting diodes. MRS Bull 2009, 34(5):318. 10.1557/mrs2009.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho HK, Lee JY, Kim CS, Yang GM: Influence of strain relaxation on structural and optical characteristics of InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells with high indium composition. J Appl Phys 2002, 91: 1166. 10.1063/1.1429765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waltereit P, Brandt O, Trampert A, Grahn HT, Menniger J, Ramsteiner M, Reiche M, Ploog KH: Nitride semiconductors free of electrostatic fields for efficient white light-emitting diodes. Nature (London) 2000, 406: 865. 10.1038/35022529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro NA, Feick H, Hong W, Cich M, Armitage R, Weber ER: Luminescence energy and carrier lifetime in InGaN/GaN quantum wells as a function of applied biaxial strain. J Appl Phys 2003, 94: 4520. 10.1063/1.1607521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S, Ware M, Wu J, Minor P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Salamo GJ: Polarization induced pn-junction without dopant in graded AlGaN coherently strained on GaN. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 122103. 10.1063/1.4753993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li S, Ware ME, Wu J, Kunets VP, Hawkridge M, Minor P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Salamo GJ: Polarization doping: reservoir effects of the substrate in AlGaN graded layers. J Appl Phys 2003, 112: 053711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park I-K, Kwon M-K, Seo S-B, Kim J-Y, Lim J-H, Park S-J: Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes with self-assembled InGaN quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 111116. 10.1063/1.2712804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M, Bhattacharya P, Guo W: InGaN/GaN self-organized quantum dot green light emitting diodes with reduced efficiency droop. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 011103. 10.1063/1.3460921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Detchprohm T, Zhu M, Li Y, Xia Y, Wetzel C, Preble EA, Liu L, Paskova T, Hanser D: Green light emitting diodes on a-plane GaN bulk substrates. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 241109. 10.1063/1.2945664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao W, Wang L, Lv WB, Wang L, Wang JX, Hao ZB, Luo Y: Growth behavior of high-indium-composition InGaN quantum dots using growth interruption method. Jpn J Appl Phys 2011, 50: 065601. 10.1143/JJAP.50.065601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao HH, Lu TC, Huang GS, Chen CY, Liang WD, Kuo HC, Wang SC: InGaN self-assembled quantum dots grown by metal–organic chemical vapour deposition with growth interruption. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 1713. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/6/028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji LW, Su YK, Chang SJ, Wu LW, Fang TH, Chen JF, Tsai TY, Xue QK, Chen SC: Growth of nanoscale InGaN self-assembled quantum dots. J Cryst Growth 2003, 249: 144. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)02130-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ee YK, Zhao H, Arif RA, Jamil M, Tansu N: Self-assembled InGaN quantum dots on GaN emitting at 520 nm grown by metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 2008, 310: 2320. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bayram C, Razeghi M: Density-controlled growth and field emission property of aligned ZnO nanorod arrays. Appl Phys A 2009, 96: 403. 10.1007/s00339-009-5186-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lv WB, Wang L, Wang JX, Hao ZB, Luo Y: Density increase of upper quantum dots in dual InGaN quantum-dot layers. Chin Phys Lett 2011, 28: 128101. 10.1088/0256-307X/28/12/128101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tessarek C, Yamaguchi T, Figge S, Hommel D: Improved capping layer growth towards increased stability of InGaN quantum dots. Phys Status Solidi C 2009, 6(No. S2):S561. 10.1002/pssc.200880913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scholz F, Off J, Fehrenbacher E, Gfrorer O, Brockt G: Investigations on structural properties of GaInN–GaN multi quantum well structures. Phys Status Solidi A 2000, 180: 315. 10.1002/1521-396X(200007)180:1<315::AID-PSSA315>3.0.CO;2-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ting SM, Ramer JC, Florescu DI, Merai VN, Albert BE, Parekh A, Lee DS, Lu D, Christini DV, Liu L, Armour EA: Morphological evolution of InGaN/GaN quantum-well heterostructures grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J Appl Phys 2003, 94: 1461. 10.1063/1.1586972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moon Y-T, Kim D-J, Song K-M, Choi C-J, Han S-H, Seong T-Y, Park S-J: Effects of thermal and hydrogen treatment on indium segregation in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells. J Appl Phys 2001, 89: 6514. 10.1063/1.1370368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Daelea BV, Tendeloo GV, Jacobs K, Moerman I, Leys MR: Formation of metallic In in InGaN∕GaN multiquantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 4379. 10.1063/1.1815054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu LW, Chang SJ, Su YK, Chuang RW, Hsu YP, Kuo CH, Lai WC, Wen TC, Tsai JM, Sheu JK: In0.23Ga0.77N/GaN MQW LEDs with a low temperature GaN cap layer. Solid State Electron 2003, 47: 2027. 10.1016/S0038-1101(03)00247-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitamura S, Hiramatsu K, Sawaki N: Fabrication of GaN hexagonal pyramids on dot-patterned GaN/sapphire substrates via selective metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. Jpn J Appl Phys 1995, 34: 1184. 10.1143/JJAP.34.L1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang HX, Amijima Y, Ishihama Y, Sakai S: Influence of carrier gas on the morphology and structure of GaN layers grown on sapphire substrate by six-wafer metal organic chemical vapor deposition system. J Cryst Growth 2001, 233: 681. 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01631-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Koukitu A, Taki T, Takahashi N, Seki H: Thermodynamic study on the role of hydrogen during the MOVPE growth of group III nitrides. J Cryst Growth 1999, 197: 99. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00894-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suihkonen S, Lang T, Svensk O, Sormunen J, Torma PT, Sopanen M, Lipsanen H, Odnoblyudov MA, Bougrov VE: Control of the morphology of InGaN/GaN quantum wells grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth 2007, 300: 324. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa PMFJ, Datta R, Kappers MJ, Vickers ME, Humphreys CJ, Graham DM, Dawson P, Godfrey MJ, Thrush EJ, Mullins JT: Misfit dislocations in In-rich InGaN/GaN quantum well structures. Phys Status Solidi A 2006, 203: 1729. 10.1002/pssa.200565219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shan W, Little BD, Song JJ, Feng ZC, Schurman M, Stall RA: Optical transitions in InxGa1−xN alloys grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 1996, 69: 3315. 10.1063/1.117291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cho Y-H, Gainer GH, Fischer AJ, Song JJ, Keller S, Mishra UK, DenBaars SP: “S-shaped” temperature-dependent emission shift and carrier dynamics in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73: 1370. 10.1063/1.122164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu ZY, Lu ZD, Yuan ZL, Yang XP, Zheng BZ, Xu JZ, Ge WK, Wang Y, Wang J, Chang LL: Thermal activation and thermal transfer of localized excitons in InAs self-organized quantum dots. Superlattice Microst 1998, 23: 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L, Zhao W, Lv WB, Wang L, Hao ZB, Luo Y: The influence of underlying layer on morphology of InGaN quantum dots self-assembled by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy. Phys Status Solidi C 2009, 9(No. 3–4):782.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chang SJ, Lai WC, Su YK, Chen JF, Liu CH, Liaw UH: InGaN-GaN multiquantum-well blue and green light-emitting diodes. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 2002, 8: 278. 10.1109/2944.999181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant nos. 2011CB301902 and 2011CB301903), the High Technology Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2011AA03A112, 2011AA03A106, and 2011AA03A105), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 60723002, 50706022, 60977022, and 51002085), and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 4091001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lai Wang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

WL wrote the paper. WL, LW, and YL conceived of and designed the experiments. WL and JW grew the samples. WL, LW, and ZH analyzed the data. WL and JW did all the measurements. All authors discussed the results, contributed to the manuscript text, commented on the manuscript, and read and approved its final version.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lv, W., Wang, L., Wang, J. et al. InGaN/GaN multilayer quantum dots yellow-green light-emitting diode with optimized GaN barriers. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 617 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • InGaN quantum dots
  • GaN barriers
  • metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy
  • light-emitting diodes