Skip to main content

Chemical vapor-deposited carbon nanofibers on carbon fabric for supercapacitor electrode applications


Entangled carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were synthesized on a flexible carbon fabric (CF) via water-assisted chemical vapor deposition at 800°C at atmospheric pressure utilizing iron (Fe) nanoparticles as catalysts, ethylene (C2H4) as the precursor gas, and argon (Ar) and hydrogen (H2) as the carrier gases. Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron dispersive spectroscopy were employed to characterize the morphology and structure of the CNFs. It has been found that the catalyst (Fe) thickness affected the morphology of the CNFs on the CF, resulting in different capacitive behaviors of the CNF/CF electrodes. Two different Fe thicknesses (5 and 10 nm) were studied. The capacitance behaviors of the CNF/CF electrodes were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry measurements. The highest specific capacitance, approximately 140 F g−1, has been obtained in the electrode grown with the 5-nm thickness of Fe. Samples with both Fe thicknesses showed good cycling performance over 2,000 cycles.


Electrochemical capacitors, also known as supercapacitors or ultracapacitors, are energy storage systems that differ from regular capacitors in that they have ultrahigh capacitance, long cycle life, and high power density[13]. Supercapacitors have many applications ranging from hybrid automobiles and large industrial equipment to storage devices for solar cells and portable consumer electronics[3, 4]. Supercapacitors can be divided into two categories: electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and pseudocapacitors. In EDLCs, different forms of carbon are commonly used as active electrode materials, and the capacitance results from electrostatic charge accumulations at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces[57]. In contrast, in redox or pseudocapacitors, in which transition metal oxides such as RuO2·x H2O and MnO2 and electronically conducting polymers such as polyaniline and polypyrrole are used as active electrode materials[811], charge storage results from fast and reversible faradic reactions at the surface of the electroactive materials. Among the many candidates for supercapacitor electrode materials, mesoporous carbon spheres[12], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and/or carbon nanofibers (CNFs)[1316], CNT/polypyrrole composites[17], and MnO2/CNT composites[18] have attracted much attention due to their excellent electrical conductivity, large surface area, chemical inertness, and high operating temperature range. Several methods have been developed to synthesize CNTs and CNFs including arc discharge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD)[1921]. In the CVD process, transition metals such as nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), or their combination are used as the catalyst and are often deposited onto the substrates before the CNTs and CNFs are grown[22]. Then, carbon-containing precursor gases such as methane (CH4)[23], acetylene (C2H2)[24], ethylene (C2H4)[25], or ethane (C2H6)[26] with the carrier gases (argon and/or hydrogen) are introduced into the CVD system and decompose at the catalyst sites to form CNTs or CNFs at the corresponding gas decomposition temperature.

In the water-assisted chemical vapor deposition (WA-CVD), water vapor is introduced during the CVD process to enhance CNT/CNF growth[27]. Two main contributions of the water vapor are as follows: (1) it inhibits catalyst nanoparticles formed at CVD temperature from diffusing into the substrates by oxidizing metal nanoparticles such as Fe; (2) it removes amorphous carbon that is formed on the active catalyst surface, thereby increasing the catalyst lifetime[28].

Compared to commonly used silicon substrates, weaved carbon fabric (CF) has several advantages such as flexibility, scalability, light weight, and low cost. In addition, due to its weave structure, it has more surface area than other conventional substrates and is more advantageous for supercapacitor applications. In recent studies, active carbon[29], multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)[3033], single-walled carbon nanotubes[34], CNT and polypyrrole composites[35], TiO2/MWCNTs[36], and graphene[37] have been successfully incorporated into the CF via various growth methods for supercapacitor applications.

In this work, CNFs are grown on CF substrates using the aforementioned WA-CVD method with Fe as the catalyst and C2H4 as the precursor gas. Furthermore, the effect of the CNF morphology on the capacitive performance is discussed. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) are utilized to characterize the structure and morphology of the CNFs. The capacitive behaviors of the CNF/CF electrodes are investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) via a three-electrode system in a neutral aqueous Na2SO4 electrolyte solution.


CF material

Panex 30 carbon fabrics made from spun yarn (plain weaved; density, 1.75 g cm−3; thickness, 406 μm) were purchased from Zoltek (St. Louis, MO, USA). The fabrics were PAN-based materials that are >99% carbonized.

Synthesis of the CNFs on CF

First, a thin film of Fe was deposited onto the CF substrate via DC sputtering at a base pressure of 10−5 Torr. The deposition rate of Fe was about 1.25 Å/s (RF power, 50W).The thickness of the Fe catalyst can significantly affect CNF morphology and distribution[38]. Two thicknesses (5 and 10 nm) of the Fe catalyst layer were deposited, and their influence on CNF morphology was compared.

The CNFs were synthesized in a tube furnace via the WA-CVD method at 800°C as reported earlier[39]; however, a brief description is given as below. The experimental setup is shown in Figure1. The CF samples with two different thicknesses of the Fe catalyst layer were first placed into a quartz boat that was placed in a quartz tube inside the furnace. Mass flow controllers allow Ar and H2 (500 and 10 sccm, respectively) to be introduced into the tube furnace to create an oxygen-free environment for CNF growth. In a previous study[40], it was found that the optimal gas flows (as shown in the Figure1) for CNF growth are as follows: Ar, 200 sccm; H2, 10 sccm; and C2H4, 20 sccm. Additional Ar was introduced through a bubbler containing DI water (50 sccm). After flushing the tube furnace for 0.5 h, Ar flow was reduced to 200 sccm, and the furnace was heated to and maintained at 800°C for 10 min. Subsequently, 20 sccm of C2H4 was introduced. After 3 min, 50 sccm of Ar was introduced through the bubbler to deliver water molecules into the CNF growth system. The CNF growth time was 2 h; after which, both the C2H4 and water vapor flows were turned off. Ar flow was increased to 500 sccm to prevent oxygen from entering the CVD system. Then, the furnace was gradually cooled to ambient temperature. Lastly, the Ar and H2 were turned off before the samples were taken out.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic design of the WA-CVD process setup.

Characterization of the CNFs/CF

The Fe catalyst nanoparticle formation on the CFs as well as the morphology of the CNFs was investigated using a Zeiss Supra 55 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). EDS provides information for elemental analysis. The microstructure of the CNFs was studied by TEM using JEOL JEM 2100 F (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The crystallinity of the CNFs was observed by electron diffraction (ED). A Sartorius CPA225D microbalance (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany) with a resolution of 0.01 mg was used to measure the weight of the CNFs for the specific capacitance calculation. Before electrochemical measurement, the grown CNFs were treated with nanostrip (commercial mixture of concentrated H2SO4 and H2O2) to remove the remaining Fe catalyst particles to accurately measure the intrinsic capacitance of the CNFs on CF. Electrochemical measurements were carried out using Solartron SI 1287 electrochemical interface system (Solartron Analytical, Farnborough, UK) via a three-electrode configuration using the CNFs/CF as the working electrodes, a platinum plate as the counter electrode, and standard saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode. A 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous neutral solution was used as the electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry was performed over the potential range from −0.2 to 0.5 V at scan rates ranging from 5 to 100 mV s−1. Cycling tests were also conducted using the same configuration in order to investigate the specific capacitance behavior over 2,000 cycles.

Results and discussion

Morphology and structure of CNFs/CF

After CNF growth, a black coating was observed on the CF as shown in Figure2a which compares the pristine CF without CNFs with CNFs/CF. It can be seen that after CNF growth, the color of the CF became darker and the fabric structure was not apparent. Figure2b shows the SEM image of the pristine CF, and it can be noted that the CF is composed of many individual fibrils with a diameter of 8 to 10 μm.

Figure 2
figure 2

CF, CNFs on CF, and CF fibrils. (a) Photograph of pristine CF (left) and CNFs on CF (right). (b) SEM image of the CF fibrils before CNF growth.

As discussed above, catalyst thickness can significantly affect the morphology and distribution of the CNFs. Thus, two catalyst thicknesses (5 and 10 nm) were deposited onto the CF to study the catalyst nanoparticle distribution. Two samples were heated in the tube furnace in an Ar and H2 environment at 800°C without the introduction of C2H4 to simulate the intermediate step of the formation of Fe nanoparticles from the Fe layer during the CVD process. Different morphologies and distributions of catalyst nanoparticles on the CF were observed by SEM as shown in Figure3. Figure3a shows an annealed 5-nm Fe catalyst layer deposited onto the CF with the inset showing an EDS analysis of the circled region; Figure3b shows an annealed 10-nm Fe catalyst layer after the same process. The Fe and O peaks suggest that the nanoparticles are actually Fe2O3 which is due to exposure to air after the Fe sputtering, while the C peak is mainly from the CF. EDS analysis of the sample with 10 nm of Fe is similar to that with 5 nm of Fe; thus, it is not shown here. It can also be seen that samples with 10 nm of Fe have a denser distribution of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on the CF.

Figure 3
figure 3

SEM images of two thicknesses of Fe catalyst on CF after annealing. (a) 5 nm of Fe catalyst on CF after annealing with the inset showing the EDS analysis of the circled area and (b) 10 nm of Fe catalyst on CF after annealing.

Figure4 shows SEM images of the CNFs on CF with different thicknesses of the Fe catalyst layer. It is consistent with the nanoparticle distribution wherein the sample with 10 nm of Fe has denser CNF growth compared to that with 5 nm of Fe. Both images show entangled CNFs. It can also be seen from the higher magnification images (Figure4b,d) that they are round shaped at the tips of the CNFs. EDS analysis (not shown here) revealed that they are the Fe catalyst particles. Although there has been a lot research progress on CNTs and CNFs since their discovery, the growth mechanism is not fully understood. The widely accepted growth mechanism of CNFs has the following steps: (1) decomposition of the precursor carbon-containing gases at the catalyst sites, (2) carbon incorporation into the catalysts, (3) saturation of the carbon and then precipitation out of the metal catalysts, and (4) formation of the carbon nanostructures[41, 42]. There are commonly two growth modes of CNFs: the tip-growth model[43] and the base-growth model[44]. The tip-growth model results from a relatively weak catalyst-substrate interaction, and as they grow, the CNFs push the catalysts off the substrate, leaving the catalyst particles at the tips[45]. The base-growth model results from a relatively strong catalyst-substrate interaction with the catalyst particles remaining on the substrate[45]. In our work, given that the catalyst particles remain at the tips of the CNFs in both SEM and TEM images, the growth model of the CNFs is the tip-growth model.

Figure 4
figure 4

SEM images of the CNFs on CF with different thicknesses of the Fe catalyst layer. (a) CNFs grown with 5 nm of Fe and (b) higher magnification of the circled area in (a). (c) CNFs grown with 10 nm of Fe on CF and (d) higher magnification of the circled area in (c).

The detailed structure information of the CNFs is illustrated in the TEM images and the ED pattern as shown in Figure5. The TEM images in Figure5a,b demonstrate that the carbon nanostructures are CNFs as opposed to CNTs since the structures are solid rather than having a hollow inside that is typical for CNTs. These structures are likely to be caused by the catalyst-substrate interaction as discussed elsewhere[46]. The diameters of the CNFs ranged from 100 to 120 nm. From Figure5b, it can be noticed that there are some dark lines across the CNFs perpendicular to their long axis; these are most likely the defects in the CNFs. The electron diffraction pattern in Figure5c shows Debye rings, which indicates that the CNFs have polycrystallinity.

Figure 5
figure 5

TEM images and ED pattern of CNFs. (a) TEM of the CNFs, (b) high-resolution TEM of the CNFs, and (c) electron diffraction pattern of the CNFs.

CNF/CF properties as supercapacitor electrodes

The as-grown CNFs were treated with nanostrip for 2 h to remove the Fe catalyst particles so that the calculated specific capacitances are exclusively from CNFs/CF. It is also noticed that the CNFs/CF changed from hydrophobic to hydrophilic as a result of the nanostrip treatment. This is because the acid attacks the defects in the CNFs, forming carboxylic groups on the sidewalls as well as at the tip[47, 48].

The specific capacitances were determined from the CV curves by the following equations[4951]:

C p = q a + q c 2 m Δ E = E 1 E 2 i a E d E + E 2 E 1 i c E d E 2 m Δ E

where Cp is the specific capacitance, m is the mass of the CNFs, ΔE is the potential range, qa and qc are the anodic and cathodic charges during the positive and negative going scan, ia and ic are the anodic and cathodic currents, and E1 and E2 are the switching potentials of the CV.

Specific capacitance can be affected by many factors such as specific surface area, pore size, and conductivity[52, 53]. However, these factors are interrelated, and a trade-off is usually needed when optimizing the specific capacitance. For instance, a small pore size may provide a large specific surface area, but it may also slow the diffusion of the electrolyte ions at interface; CNTs have less defects which leads to higher conductivity than CNFs, but the specific area of CNTs is much less than that of CNFs[52]. In this case, it is desirable for the carbon supercapacitor materials to have relatively high conductivity and also mesopores that are large enough for the electrolyte ions to diffuse and small enough to provide a large surface area[54].

Figure6a,b shows the CV curves of the CNF/CF electrode grown with 5 and 10 nm of Fe catalyst via a three-electrode configuration at a potential window from −0.2 to 0.5 V in 0.5 M Na2SO4 at different scan rates. Both CNF/CF samples with different catalyst thicknesses (5 and 10 nm) exhibit good electrochemical performance. Both CV curves in Figure6 are quasi-rectangular shape, which represent capacitive behaviors of CNF/CF electrodes. The areas of the close loop of the curves represent the charges stored at the CNFs/CF for one cycle. It is interesting to see that under the same scan rate, the charges stored at the CNFs grown with 5 nm of Fe are larger than those grown with 10 nm of Fe, which represent better capacitive behavior. Figure6c,d shows the corresponding specific capacitances for different scan rates. For CNFs/CF with 5 nm of Fe, the specific capacitances are 142 and 32 F g−1 at the scan rates of 5 and 100 mV s−1, respectively. By comparison, for the CNF/CF electrode grown with 10 nm of Fe, the specific capacitances are 99 and 24 F g−1 at the scan rates of 5 and 100 mV s−1, respectively. For both samples, the specific capacitances at 100 mV s−1 only retained about 30% of the capacitances at 5 mV s−1. As stated above, this is likely to be related to the morphology of the entangled CNF structures which might hinder the diffusion ability of the electrolyte ions to travel from the aqueous solution to the electrode. It is also interesting to see that although the CNFs grown with 10 nm of Fe had a denser distribution of CNFs as suggested by Figure4; the specific capacitance of the CNFs does not benefit from it. This suggests that the increasing density of the CNFs does not necessarily increase the specific area (area per unit gram) of the CNFs, and/or it can also decrease the pore size due to the higher degree of entanglement and thus lead to the attenuation of the electrolyte ion diffusion.

Figure 6
figure 6

CV curves and specific capacitances of CNF/CF electrodes. (a) CV curves of a CNF/CF electrode (5 nm of Fe) at various scan rates. (b) CV curves of a CNF/CF electrode (10 nm of Fe) at various scan rates. (c) Specific capacitances of a CNF/CF electrode (5 nm of Fe) at various scan rates. (d) Specific capacitances of CNF/CF electrode (10 nm of Fe) at various scan rates.

Figure7a shows the CV results of the CNF grown with 5 nm of Fe during the cycling test, and Figure7b shows the calculated specific capacitances for different cycles. It can be noted that in the first 500 cycles, the specific capacitance increased from 100 to 155 F g−1 and then started to stabilize at approximately 150 F g−1 for more than 2,000 cycles. The initial increase of the specific capacitance is also observed in other researchers' work[55, 56] and is due to the activation process that may gradually let the trapped electrolyte ions diffuse out[57]. More importantly, the specific capacitance at the 2,000th cycle maintained approximately 95% of the peak capacitance value (155 F g−1 at the 500th cycle), which demonstrates a very good stability in the cycling performance of the CNF/CF electrodes.

Figure 7
figure 7

CV results of a CNF during cycling test and specific capacitances. (a) CV curves of a CNF/CF electrode (5 nm of Fe) during the cycling test. (b) Specific capacitances of a CNF/CF electrode as function of the number of cycles.


CNFs were directly grown on flexible CF substrates via the WA-CVD method using Fe as the catalysts and C2H4 as the precursor gas. Different thicknesses of the catalyst (5 and 10 nm) led to different morphologies and densities of the CNFs on the CF, thus resulting in different capacitive performances of the CNF/CF electrode as a supercapacitor. CNFs grown with 5 nm of Fe demonstrated better capacitive behaviors with a specific capacitance of approximately 140 F g−1 at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1, compared to 99 F g−1 for its counterpart. The electrode shows good cycling stability for more than 2,000 cycles. The CNF/CF electrodes are flexible, stretchable, and scalable, and hence, they could be a good candidate for flexible supercapacitor applications.


  1. Conway BE: Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. New York: Kluwer; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Frackowiak E, Beguin F: Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 2001, 39: 937–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simon P, Gogotsi Y: Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat Mater 2008, 7: 845–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller JR, Simon P: Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 2008, 321: 651–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frackowiak E: Carbon materials for supercapacitor application. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2007, 9: 1774–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao X, Sanchez BM, Dobson PJ, Grant PS: The role of nanomaterials in redox-based supercapacitors for next generation energy storage devices. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 839–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim B, Chung H, Kim W: High-performance supercapacitors based on vertically aligned carbon. Nanotechnology 2012, 23: 155401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu CC, Chang KH, Lin MC, Wu YT: Design and tailoring of the nanotubular arrayed architecture of hydrous RuO2 for next generation supercapacitors. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 2690–2695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei W, Cui X, Chen W, Ivey DG: Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 2011, 40: 1697–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fusalba F, Gouérec P, Villers D, Bélanger D: Electrochemical characterization of polyaniline in nonaqueous electrolyte and its evaluation as electrode material for electrochemical supercapacitors. J Electrochem Soc 2001, 148: A1-A6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Snook GA, Kao P, Best AS: Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilgosz K, Chen X, Kierzek K, Machnikowski J, Kalenczuk R, Mijowska E: Template method synthesis of carbon spheres and its applications as supercapacitors. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebbesen LH, Hiura H, Bennett JW, Ghaemi HF, Thio T: Electrical conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996, 382: 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Lu Y, Ye Q, Cinke M: Carbon nanotube sensors for gas and organic vapor detection. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 929–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lota G, Fic K, Frackowiak E: Carbon nanotubes and their composites in electrochemical applications. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 1592–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan H, Li J, Feng YP: Carbon nanotubes for supercapacitor. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 654–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang B, Xu Y, Zheng Y, Dai L, Zhang M, Yang J, Chen Y, Chen X, Zhou J: A facile synthesis of polypyrrole/carbon nanotube composites with ultrathin, uniform and thickness-tunable polypyrrole shells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Yang QM, Zhitomirsky I: Composite electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 512–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park YS, Kim KS, Jeong HJ, Kim WS, Moon JM, An KH, Bae DJ, Lee YS, Park GS, Lee YH: Low pressure synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by arc discharge. Synth Met 2002, 126: 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen CX, Chen WZ, Zhang YF: Synthesis of carbon nano-tubes by pulsed laser ablation at normal pressure in metal nano-sol. Physica E 2005, 28: 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joseyacaman M, Mikiyoshida M, Rendon L, Santiesteban JG: Catalytic growth of carbon microtubules with fullerene structure. Appl Phys Lett 1993, 62: 657–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deck C, Vecchio K: Prediction of carbon nanotube growth success by the analysis of carbon-catalyst binary phase diagrams. Carbon 2006, 44: 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chai S, Zein SHS, Mohamed AR: Synthesizing carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers over supported-nickel oxide catalysts via catalytic decomposition of methane. Diamond Relat Mater 2007, 16: 1656–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hulicova-Jurcakova D, Li X, Zhu Z, de Marco R, Lu G: Graphitic carbon nanofibers synthesized by the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method and their electrochemical performances in supercapacitors. Energy Fuel 2008, 22: 4139–4145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiao WM, Song Y, Yoon SH, Lim SY, Yoon SH, Mochida I, Imaoka T: Carbon nanosphere produced in an arc-discharge process. New Carbon Mater 2006, 44: 187–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Louis B, Gulino G, Vieira R, Amadou J, Dintzer T, Galvagno S, Centi G, Ledoux MJ, Pham-Huu C: High yield synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes by catalytic decomposition of ethane over iron supported on alumina catalyst. Catal Today 2005, 102: 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hata K, Futaba DN, Mizuno K, Namai T, Yumura M, Ijima S: Water-assisted highly efficient synthesis of impurity-free single-waited carbon nanotubes. Science 2004, 306: 1362–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yun YH, Shanov V, Tu Y, Subramaniam S, Schulz MJ: Growth mechanism of long aligned multiwall carbon nanotube arrays by water-assisted chemical vapor deposition. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 23920–23925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jost K, Perez CR, McDonough JK, Presser V, Heon M, Dion G, Gogotsi Y: Carbon coated textiles for flexible energy storage. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 5060–5067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy ALM, Shaijumon MM, Gowda SR, Ajayan PM: Multisegmented Au-MnO2/carbon nanotube hybrid coaxial arrays for high-power supercapacitor applications. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 658–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsu YK, Chen YC, Lin YG, Chen LC, Chen KH: High-cell-voltage supercapacitor of carbon nanotube/carbon cloth operating in neutral aqueous solution. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 3383–3387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Boukhalfa S, Evanoff K, Yushin G: Atomic layer deposition of vanadium oxide on carbon nanotubes for high-power supercapacitor electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 2012, 5: 6872–6879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. An Q, Rider AN, Thostenson ET: Electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes onto carbon-fiber fabric for production of carbon/epoxy composites with improved mechanical properties. Carbon 2012, 50: 4130–4143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen P, Chen H, Qiu J, Zhou C: Inkjet printing of single-walled carbon nanotube/RuO2 nanowire supercapacitors on cloth fabrics and flexible substrates. Nano Res 2010, 3: 594–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee H, Kim H, Cho MS, Choi J, Lee Y: Fabrication of polypyrrole (PPy)/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite electrode on ceramic fabric for supercapacitor applications. Electrochim Acta 2011, 56(22):7460–7466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reddy ALM, Amitha FE, Jafri I, Ramaprabhu S: Asymmetric flexible supercapacitor stack. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008, 3: 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu WW, Yan XB, Lang JW, Peng C, Xue QJ: Flexible and conductive nanocomposite electrode based on graphene sheets and cotton cloth for supercapacitor. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 17245–17253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei YY, Eres G, Merkulov VI, Lowndes DH: Effect of catalyst film thickness on carbon nanotube growth by selective area chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78: 1394–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao Y, Adusumilli SP, Turner J, Lesperance L, Westgate C, Sammakia B: Factors affecting the growth of carbon nanofibers on titanium substrates and their electrical properties. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012, 12: 7777–7787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Adusumilli SP: Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes and Pyrite Films Through Chemical Vapor Deposition at Atmospheric Pressure. Master thesis. Binghamton University, Electrical Engineering Department; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yoon YJ, Baik HK: Catalytic growth mechanism of carbon nanofibers through chemical vapor deposition. Diamond Relat Mater 2001, 10: 1214–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Homma Y, Kobayashi Y, Ogino T: Role of transition metal catalysts in single-walled carbon nanotube growth in chemical vapor deposition. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 12161–12164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baker RTK, Harris S, Feates FS, Waite RJ: Nucleation and growth of carbon deposits from the nickel catalyzed decomposition of acetylene. J Catalysis 1972, 26: 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baker RTK, Waite RJ: Formation of carbonaceous deposits from the platinum-iron catalyzed decomposition of acetylene. J Catalysis 1975, 37: 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar M, Ando Y: Chemical vapor deposition of carbon nanotubes: a review on growth mechanism and mass production. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010, 10: 3739–3758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gao Y, Pandey GP, Turner J, Westgate C, Sammakia B: Effects of the catalyst and substrate thickness on the carbon nanotubes/nanofibers as supercapacitor electrode. Phys Scripta 2012, 86: 065603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tasis D, Tagmatarchis N, Bianco A, Prato M: Chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev 2006, 106: 1105–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Daniel S, Rao TP, Rao KS, Rani SU, Naidu GRK, Lee HY, Kawai T: A review of DNA functionalized/grafted carbon nanotubes and their characterization. Sens Actuators B: Chem 2007, 122: 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nam KW, Lee CW, Yang XQ, Cho BW, Yoon WS, Kim KB: Electrodeposited manganese oxides on three-dimensional carbon nanotube substrate: supercapacitive behaviour in aqueous and organic electrolytes. J Power Sources 2009, 188: 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li H, Wang J, Chu Q, Wang Z, Zhang F, Wang S: Theoretical and experimental specific capacitance of polyaniline in sulfuric acid. J Power Sources 2009, 90: 578–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang CC, Hu CC: Electrochemical catalytic modification of activated carbon fabrics by ruthenium chloride for supercapacitors. Carbon 2005, 43: 1926–1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim SU, Lee KH: Carbon nanofiber composites for the electrodes of electrochemical capacitors. Chem Phys Lett 2004, 400: 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang LL, Zhao XS: Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 2009, 38: 2520–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu B, Wu F, Chen RJ, Cao GP, Chen S, Zhou ZM, Yang YS: Highly mesoporous and high surface area carbon: a high capacitance electrode material for EDLCs with various electrolytes. Electrochem Comm 2008, 10: 795–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cao XH, Shi YM, Shi WH, Lu G, Huang X, Yan QY, Zhang QC, Zhang H: Preparation of novel 3D graphene networks for supercapacitor applications. Small 2011, 7: 3163–3168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang XJ, Shi WH, Zhu JX, Zhao WY, Ma J, Mhaisalkar S, Maria TL, Yang YH, Zhang H, Hng HH, Yan QY: Synthesis of porous NiO nanocrystals with controllable surface area and their application as supercapacitor electrodes. Nano Res 2010, 3: 643–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan C, Zhang X, Su L, Gao B, Shen L: Facile synthesis and self-assembly of hierarchical porous NiO nano/micro spherical superstructures for high performance supercapacitors. J Mater Chem 2009, 19: 5772–5777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the Center for Autonomous Solar Power (CASP) of the State University of New York at Binghamton for funding this work. We are also grateful to Daniel VanHart from CASP for the TEM sample preparation and Dr. In-Tae Bae from the Analytical and Diagnostics Laboratory (ADL) of Binghamton University for the TEM and ED data analysis. We would like to thank Mr. Siva P. Adusumilli for helping in the CVD experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaind P Pandey.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YG carried out the synthesis and the characterization of CNFs on carbon fabric and drafted the manuscript. GPP carried out electrochemical characterization of the CNFs/CF, made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of data, and revised the draft of the manuscript critically. JT, CRW, and BG read and contributed to the improvement of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Pandey, G.P., Turner, J. et al. Chemical vapor-deposited carbon nanofibers on carbon fabric for supercapacitor electrode applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 651 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Carbon nanofibers
  • Carbon fabric
  • Water-assisted chemical vapor deposition
  • Supercapacitor
  • Cyclic voltammetry