- Nano Express
- Open Access
Controlling interferometric properties of nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide
© Kumeria and Losic; licensee Springer. 2012
- Received: 14 September 2011
- Accepted: 26 January 2012
- Published: 26 January 2012
A study of reflective interference spectroscopy [RIfS] properties of nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide [AAO] with the aim to develop a reliable substrate for label-free optical biosensing is presented. The influence of structural parameters of AAO including pore diameters, inter-pore distance, pore length, and surface modification by deposition of Au, Ag, Cr, Pt, Ni, and TiO2 on the RIfS signal (Fabry-Perot fringe) was explored. AAO with controlled pore dimensions was prepared by electrochemical anodization of aluminium using 0.3 M oxalic acid at different voltages (30 to 70 V) and anodization times (10 to 60 min). Results show the strong influence of pore structures and surface modifications on the interference signal and indicate the importance of optimisation of AAO pore structures for RIfS sensing. The pore length/pore diameter aspect ratio of AAO was identified as a suitable parameter to tune interferometric properties of AAO. Finally, the application of AAO with optimised pore structures for sensing of a surface binding reaction of alkanethiols (mercaptoundecanoic acid) on gold surface is demonstrated.
- nanoporous alumina
- reflective interference spectroscopy
- interference spectrum
- optical label-free biosensing
Label-free optical biosensing has attracted a considerable interest in recent years for biomedical and environmental applications regarding its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, easy miniaturisation, and superior performance [1, 2]. In general, the principle is based on the detection of interfacial changes of the binding reaction at the surface and can be employed not only for a sensitive and selective measurement of specific biomolecules, but also for real-time monitoring of binding kinetics, thermodynamics, affinity, and specificity [3, 4]. Label-free biosensing devices can incorporate different specific recognition elements, such as antibodies, DNA molecules, or enzymes that convert the reaction with a given analyte into a quantifiable signal such as an optical, acoustic, electrochemical, or mass change [2, 5]. Among several optical methods based on surface plasmon resonance, enhanced Raman scattering, wave guiding, Bragg diffraction, and photonic bandgaps, the reflective interference spectroscopy [RIfS] method is recognised as particularly promising for the development of label- free biosensing devices [6–10].
The RIfS is a sensitive optical method based on white light interference at a thin film where the interference pattern depends on the product of the refractive index (n) and thickness (L) . The binding of analyte to the surface of the thin film produces a change in the optical thickness (2nL) (i.e. product of film thickness and refractive index), and these changes result in a shift of the characteristic interference pattern measured in the optical spectrum. The RIfS methods using polymer films and membranes have been explored over the last two decades by the Gauglitz group for label-free detection of various molecules including proteins, DNA, herbicides, and hydrocarbons [4, 6, 11–14]. In addition to thin polymer films, the Sailor group has demonstrated that nanoporous structures such as porous silicon prepared by electrochemical etching could offer superior RIfS properties for chemical and biological sensing [15–19]. The ultimate advantage of a nanoporous RIfS platform is the provision of a three-dimensional structure with a large specific surface area for increased ligand immobilisation density and analyte capture in comparison with soft and chemically sensitive polymer films. The surface of porous silicon can also be easily modified with desired functional groups and covalently attached targeting biomolecules . Therefore, it is not surprising that several groups have explored porous silicon as a promising optical interferometric biosensing platform for applications, including label-free sensing of DNA, antibodies, proteins, and cells [15–19, 21–23]. However, these studies showed several limitations of porous silicon due to its poor stability and rapid degradation, which can adversely influence the biosensing signal . To address this problem, new porous films were explored, with nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide [AAO] and titania nanotubes prepared by self-ordering electrochemical anodization of Al and Ti being recently introduced as new platforms for the development of more stable interferometric biosensing devices [24–27].
Similarly, to porous silicon, the interference signal which can be defined by the number of fringes and their intensity or amplitude from the porous AAO surface is assumed to depend on pore geometry, which suggests the importance of optimisation of AAO pore structures for RIfS sensing applications. To optimise the AAO platform, it is essential to have a better understanding of how pore structures influence RIfS properties. Hence, the aim of this work is to explore the impact of structural parameters of AAO on RIfS response with particular focus on pore diameters, inter-pore distance, pore wall thickness (defined by dw = di - dp), pore length, and surface modification. Several examples are presented to show how the interferometric signal from AAO can be tuned by controlling pore dimensions using the anodization process (voltage and anodization time, pore widening, surface coating). Finally, a real-time measurement of binding alkanethiol molecules on gold surface using an AAO probe is demonstrated to confirm the capability of the AAO RIfS sensor in monitoring surface binding reactions.
Aluminium foil (thickness 0.1 mm, 99.997%) was supplied by Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). Oxalic acid (Chem-Supply Pty Ltd, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia), chromium trioxide (Mallinckrodt Inc., Miami, FL, USA), phosphoric acid (85%, BDH, Poole, Dorset, UK), and mercaptoundecanoic acid [MUA] (Sigma-Aldrich Pty. Ltd, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) were used as received. High-purity water was used for all solution preparations as produced by sequential treatments of reverse osmosis and a final filtering step through a 0.22-μm filter.
Preparation of nanoporous AAO
Nanoporous AAO was prepared by a two-step anodization process using 0.3 M oxalic acid as an electrolyte at 0°C as previously described [28, 31, 35]. The first anodized layer of the porous alumina was prepared at a voltage of 60 to 80 V, then removed by an oxide removal solution (0.2 M chromium trioxide and 0.4 M phosphoric acid). For samples where the final anodization voltage was lower than the first anodization, an intermediate anodization step was carried out at 30 V for 60 min. Final anodization was carried out at a voltage varying between 30 and 70 V and for a time ranging from 2 min to 2 h in order to prepare AAO with desired pore diameters, inter-pore distances, and length. Pore-widening process in 10% phosphoric acid (10 min to 1 h) was performed to prepare AAO with equal inter-pore distances but different pore diameters.
Structural characterisation of AAO
Pore diameters and thickness of the AAO film were determined using a scanning electron microscope [SEM] (XL 30, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). For cross-sectional SEM imaging, freestanding AAOs were prepared by removing the underlying Al using a solution (HCl + 0.2 M CuCl2). Prepared AAO samples for SEM characterisations were coated with a 3-nm Pt layer.
Surface modification of prepared AAO
The coating of ultra-thin metal films (Au, Ag, Cr, Ni, and Pt) onto AAO was performed using metal vapour deposition by Emitech K975X (Quorum Technologies, Ashford, UK). The thickness of deposited films was approximately 8 nm and controlled by the film thickness monitor. Atomic layer deposition of titania oxide using titanium tetrachloride and water as a precursor at a deposition temperature of 200°C was preformed as described previously .
Optical setup for reflective interference measurements
Optical RIfS measurements were performed using a microfibre optic spectrometer (Jaz, Ocean Optics, Inc., Dunedin, FL, USA). A bifurcated optical fibre with one of its trunk illuminated by a tungsten lamp carried the light to the probe, and the reflected light was collected by the same probe and fed to the other trunk of the optical fibre, which at the end, fed the reflected light to the spectrometer. The spot size of the light from the probe onto the AAO surface was kept around 2 mm in diameter, and all the reflective interference data were collected at a spectral range from 400 to 900 nm from the AAO film. Effective optical thickness [EOT] can be obtained by calculating the slope of a straight line fitting the graph of m vs. 1/λ using a peak finding algorithm or by applying FFT to the interference spectra. FFT from IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics, Inc., Potland, OR, USA) library was applied to finally obtain the EOT (2neffL value in the Fabry-Perot interference fringe equation) .
Functional characterisation using microchip RIfS AAO sensor
Au-modified AAO substrates were placed into a custom-designed microfluidic channel connected with the fibre optic probe and programmable syringe pump (New Era Pump Systems, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA). The adsorption of MUA on the AAO surface introduced into the microfluidic cell at concentrations from 0.01 to 1 mM was continuously monitored. Rinsing with a water solution for 5 min was performed between each concentration change.
Controlling dpand lpof AAO
The thickness of the porous layer or lp was the second important parameter explored in this work, which is considered to have an influence on the RIfS signal. Because pore growth during the anodization process is a time-dependent process, anodization time is used as a simple strategy to control lp of AAO. However, the pore growth rate (in nanometers per minute) is not the same at different anodization voltages (30 to 70 V); thus, it is necessary to determine the growth rate for each of these conditions. The graph in Figure 2d presents an example of the lp (lp = 1.7 to 7 μm) prepared by anodization times (10 to 60 min) at 50 V. An average pore growth rate of 100 ± 35 nm/min was determined for this condition. When a higher anodization voltage (60 V) was applied, the rate of pore growth significantly increased (240 ± 25 nm/min). All other calibration graphs prepared using anodization voltages from 30 to 70 V showed a linear dependence between the lp and anodization time, confirming the ability of this approach to prepare AAO with controlled lp.
The influence of dpon RIfS
The fringes completely disappeared from AAO treated by 55 min in phosphoric acid. The conclusion is clear: a smaller surface area between pores will provide a lower-intensity RIfS signal. This result is in apparent disagreement with previously presented results, where increased numbers of fringes were observed by increasing dp. It clearly indicates the importance of the dw as another parameter for optimisation of AAO platform for interferometric sensing. The reduced light reflection from AAO as a result of a decrease of the surface area between pores is the explanation for the observed impact on the RIfS signal. In the case of sensing applications based on surface binding detection, the availability of an active surface area on the top of pores vs. a surface area inside of pores could also have an impact on the sensitivity of the RIfS device.
Impact of lp
The lc for AAO with dp from 20 to 40 nm
Pore diameter (nm)
Critical pore length (μm)
5.4 ± 0.5
7.3 ± 0.3
8.1 ± 0.2
9.5 ± 0.3
The lo are defined as the range, which provides both the highest intensity of RIfS signal and an optimal number of fringes. This value is also dependent on dp and requires specific optimisation for each diameter of AAO. The lo for AAO with a dp of 40 is in the range of lp > 2.5 μm to lp < 5 μm and results in an optimal number of fringes and intensity of the fringe signal.
Influence of surface modifications
The reflectance of light from the surface depends on the reflectivity of the surface, which is also assumed to have an influence on the interference signal from the AAO surface. Thus, the influence of surface modification of AAO pores on the intensity of the fringe signal was explored to further optimise their RIfS properties. Two approaches were explored to modify the AAO surface, including deposition of ultra-thin metal films on the top surface and conformal coating inside of pores by the oxide film using atomic layer deposition [ALD]. The ultra-thin metal coatings were typically applied at an optimal thickness of approximately 7 to 8 nm, as thicker films could make substantial morphological changes to dp or alter and/or completely diminish the interference spectrum.
Effect of different modifications of AAO pores on fringe intensity
Interference maximum intensitya (a.u.)
10 ± 3
50 ± 5
98 ± 6
100 ± 8
65 ± 2
35 ± 2
11 ± 2
The enhancement in intensity for the metal coating was about three to five times, with the highest signal for Au and Cr coatings. These changes in intensity are attributed to an increase in reflectivity of the coated AAO surface after thin-metal coating. Results were not surprising since it was expected that the deposition of reflective metal films will increase the intensity of the RIfS signal and therefore considerably improve optical properties of AAO. Additional advantages of the metal coating such as Au include its chemical stability and the ability to assemble desired molecules with a specific binding affinity toward targeting molecules important for biosensing applications. The RIfS signal from ALD conformal coating of AAO pores with a 10-nm-thick titania oxide layer did not show any enhancement in comparison to unmodified AAO. This result can be explained by the impact of this coating on the lp/dp, in addition to its lower reflectivity in comparison with metal films.
Functional characterisation of AAO RIfS sensor
At the low concentration of 0.01 mM, a big shift in EOT is observed, but after the introduction of water, the signal reaches again the baseline, indicating weak and reversible adsorption of thiol molecules. By increasing the thiol concentration, an increase in the EOT signal is observed, but without the return to baseline, showing an irreversible adsorption of the MUA. This result can be explained by the formation of more stable self-assembled monolayers due to an increasing thiol concentration. This brief study shows the capability of gold-modified AAO to be used as a sensitive device to detect surface-confined reactions.
In summary, the evaluation of the RIfS performance of nanoporous AAO influenced by its structural and surface properties is presented. Parameters including dp, dw, lp, and surface modification were found to have a significant influence on the RIfS signal (number of Fabry-Perot fringes) and intensity of AAO. Tuning of these parameters by anodization conditions (voltage and anodization time) and additional chemical dissolution was demonstrated as an appropriate approach to control and optimise RIfS properties of AAO for sensing applications. However, our results showed that it is necessary to consider their collective rather than individual contribution, and the lp/dp is recommended as a simplified parameter for the optimisation process. Thin-metal coatings of AAO by different metals (Au, Cr, Ag, Pt, etc.) were found to considerably enhance the intensity of the interference spectrum (non-coated 8 to 15, coated 25 to 120). The ability to functionalise and attach sensing molecules onto these surfaces considerably extends the sensing capability of AAO as a RIfS platform. Finally, AAO with optimised pore dimensions coated with the gold film was characterised for adsorption of thiol molecules on gold, showing an excellent sensitivity to probe the surface binding reaction. In conclusion, these results confirm AAO as a promising RIfS platform for future generations of sensitive and selective label-free biosensing devices.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council (DP 0770930) and the University of South Australia for this work. We thank Prof. M. J. Sailor (UCSD) for his help with the FFT analysis software. We also thank the Australian National Fabrication Facility Limited (ANFF) SA node at UniSA (Ian Wark Research Institute) and Dr Luke Parkinson for the microfluidic device fabrication. We extend our thanks to Dr. Gerry Triani and Dr. Peter Evans from ANSTO for the ALD coating of samples.
- Gauglitz G, Proll G: Strategies for label-free optical detection. In Biosensing for the 21st Century. Edited by: Renneberg R, Lisdat F. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2008:395–432. [Scheper T (Series Editor): Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 109] [Scheper T (Series Editor): Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 109]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turner APF: Current trends in biosensor research and development. Sens Actuators 1989, 17: 433–450. 10.1016/0250-6874(89)80030-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Justin JG: Biosensor technology for detecting biological warfare agents: recent progress and future trends. Anal Chim Acta 2006, 559: 137–151. 10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gauglitz G: Direct optical sensors: principles and selected applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005, 381: 141–155. 10.1007/s00216-004-2895-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolatabadi JEN, Mashinchian O, Ayoubi B, Jamali AA, Mobed A, Losic D, Omidi Y, de la Guardia M: Optical and electrochemical DNA nanobiosensors. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2011, 30: 459–472. 10.1016/j.trac.2010.11.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gauglitz G: Direct optical detection in bioanalysis: an update. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010, 398: 2363–2372. 10.1007/s00216-010-3904-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dieringer JA, McFarland AD, Shah NC, Stuart DA, Whitney AV, Yonzon CR, Young MA, Zhang X, Van Duyne RP: Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy: new materials, concepts, characterization tools, and applications. Faraday Discuss 2006, 132: 9–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Willets KA, Van Duyne RP: Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2007, 58: 267–297. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104607View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosi NL, Mirkin CA: Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev 2005, 105: 1547–1562. 10.1021/cr030067fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rich RL, Myszka DG: Survey of the year 2005 commercial optical biosensor literature. J Mol Recognit 2006, 19: 478–534. 10.1002/jmr.808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gauglitz G, Ingenhoff J: Design of new integrated optical substrates for immuno-analytical applications. Fresenius J Anal Chem 1994, 349: 355–359. 10.1007/BF00326599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kraus G, Brecht A, Vasic V, Gauglitz G: Polymer based RIFS sensing: an approach to the indirect measurement of organic pollutants in water. Fresenius J Anal Chem 1994, 348: 598–601. 10.1007/BF00323940View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann R, Osaki T, Gauglitz G, Werner C: Combined microslit electrokinetic measurements and reflectometric interference spectroscopy to study protein adsorption processes. Biointerphases 2007, 2: 159–164. 10.1116/1.2814066View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rothmund M, Schütz A, Brecht A, Gauglitz G, Berthel G, Gräfe D: Label free binding assay with spectroscopic detection for pharmaceutical screening. Fresenius J Anal Chem 1997, 359: 15–22. 10.1007/s002160050529View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin VS-Y, Motesharei K, Dancil K-PS, Sailor MJ, Ghadiri MR: A porous silicon-based optical interferometric biosensor. Sci 1997, 278: 840–843. 10.1126/science.278.5339.840View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dancil K-PS, Greiner DP, Sailor MJ: A porous silicon optical biosensor: detection of reversible binding of IgG to a protein A-modified surface. J Am Chem Soc 1999, 121: 7925–7930. 10.1021/ja991421nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao J, Gao T, Sailor MJ: Porous-silicon vapor sensor based on laser interferometry. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77: 901. 10.1063/1.1306640View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Létant SE, Sailor MJ: Molecular identification by time-resolved interferometry in a porous silicon film. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 335–338. 10.1002/1521-4095(200103)13:5<335::AID-ADMA335>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz MP, Alvarez SD, Sailor MJ: Porous SiO2 interferometric biosensor for quantitative determination of protein interactions: binding of protein A to immunoglobulins derived from different species. Anal Chem 2005, 79: 327–334.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kilian KA, Bocking T, Gooding JJ: The importance of surface chemistry in mesoporous materials: lessons from porous silicon biosensors. Chem Commun 2009, 630–640.Google Scholar
- Jane A, Dronov R, Hodges A, Voelcker NH: Porous silicon biosensors on the advance. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27: 230–239. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.12.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guan B, Magenau A, Kilian KA, Ciampi S, Gaus K, Reece PJ, Gooding JJ: Mesoporous silicon photonic crystal microparticles: towards single-cell optical biosensors. Faraday Discuss 2011, 149: 301–317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang H, DeLouise LA, Miller BL, Fauchet PM: Label-free quantitative detection of protein using macroporous silicon photonic bandgap biosensors. Anal Chem 2007, 79: 1502–1506. 10.1021/ac0608366View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez SD, Li C-P, Chiang CE, Schuller IK, Sailor MJ: A label-free porous alumina interferometric immunosensor. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 3301–3307. 10.1021/nn900825qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan S, Rothberg LJ: Interferometric sensing of biomolecular binding using nanoporous aluminum oxide templates. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 811–814. 10.1021/nl034055lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song YY, Schmuki P: Modulated TiO2 nanotube stacks and their use in interference sensors. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 579–582. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.02.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mun K-S, Alvarez SD, Choi W-Y, Sailor MJ: A stable, label-free optical interferometric biosensor based on TiO2 nanotube arrays. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 2070–2076. 10.1021/nn901312fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Masuda H, Fukuda K: ordered metal nanohole arrays made by a two-step replication of honeycomb structures of anodic alumina. Sci 1995, 268: 1466–1468. 10.1126/science.268.5216.1466View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jessensky O, Muller F, Gosele U: Self-organized formation of hexagonal pore arrays in anodic alumina. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 72: 1173–1175. 10.1063/1.121004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Vergara S, Habazaki H, Skeldon P, Thompson G: Formation of porous anodic alumina at high current efficiency. Nanotechnol 2007, 18: 415605. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/41/415605View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Losic D, Velleman L, Kant K, Kumeria T, Gulati K, Shapter JG, Beattie DA, Simovic S: Self-ordering electrochemistry: a simple approach for engineering nanopore and nanotube arrays for emerging applications*. Aust J Chem 2011, 64: 294–301. 10.1071/CH10398View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Platschek B, Keilbach A, Bein T: Mesoporous structures confined in anodic alumina membranes. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 2395–2412. 10.1002/adma.201002828View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Losic D, Simovic S: Self-ordered nanopore and nanotube platforms for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2009, 6: 1363–1381. 10.1517/17425240903300857View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Losic D, Shapter JG, Mitchell JG, Voelcker NH: Fabrication of gold nanorod arrays by templating from porous alumina. Nanotechnol 2005, 16: 2275. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Losic D, Lillo M, Losic D Jr: Porous alumina with shaped pore geometries and complex pore architectures fabricated by cyclic anodization. Small 2009, 5: 1392–1397. 10.1002/smll.200801645View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Losic D, Triani G, Evans PJ, Atanacio A, Mitchell JG, Voelcker NH: Controlled pore structure modification of diatoms by atomic layer deposition of TiO2. J Mater Chem 2006, 16: 4029–4034. 10.1039/b610188gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pacholski C, Sartor M, Sailor MJ, Cunin F, Miskelly GM: Biosensing using porous silicon double-layer interferometers: reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127: 11636–11645. 10.1021/ja0511671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.