Background

Noble metal nanoparticles such as Au and Pt nanoparticles have high catalytic activity, nontoxicity, and biocompatibility [1]. Conducting polymers are usually used as matrix to noble metal nanoparticles and then applied in biosensors [2, 3], electrocatalysts [4], and supercapacitors [5], due to the synergy effect between polymer matrix and inorganic nanoparticles. Among various conducting polymers, polyaniline (PANI) has a potential use in a broad field because of its high environmental stability, low cost, relatively facile preparation, and reversible control of conductivity by charge-transfer doping and protonation [6]. The composite of PANI and Au (or Pt) nanoparticles, which have been intensively investigated, are also attractive materials as they combine the properties of large surface area, high conductivity, and excellent biocompatibility [7, 8]. Up to now, PANI/Au (or Pt) hybrid material can be synthesized chemically or electrochemically. These methods have the advantages of easily controlling operating conditions. However, they have significant disadvantages such as the formation of toxic waste products and are not suitable for mass production. Solid-state synthesis is a mechanochemical reaction that occurs between powders in the solid state [9]. It is a new synthetic method to develop green chemistry with obvious advantages: reduced pollution, low costs, and simplicity in process and handling. Also, these factors are especially important in the industry.

H2O2 as a metabolic intermediate involved in many biological reactions plays an important role in the fields of chemistry, biology, clinical control, and environmental protection; therefore, its detection is of great importance [10]. To date, various techniques including spectrometry, titrimetry, chemiluminescence, and electrochemistry have been employed for determination [1, 11, 12]. Among the developed techniques, electrochemical methods have become one of the predominant analytical techniques due to their high sensitivity, low cost, and low power requirement [13]. Moreover, among the electrochemical methods, amperometric sensors have shown great potential for developing versatile analytical techniques for H2O2 determination [14]. The conducting polymer/metal composite amperometric enzyme electrodes as sensors have been paid particular attention due to their advantages of high sensitivity and specificity [14, 15]. However, an efficient electron transfer between the active site of the enzyme and the electrode surface is not quite stable and depends on the enzyme type, temperature, and pH as a function of time [15]. Therefore, an alternative sensor called ‘enzymeless sensor’, which try to mimic natural enzymes with the same effectiveness and selectivity, has been widely studied [16, 17].

Herein, we report the exploration of synthesizing the polyaniline/noble metal hybrid materials by solid-state synthesis method at room temperature. The structure, morphology, and components of composites were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), UV-visible (vis), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), energy dispersed spectrum (EDS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) methods. Furthermore, the composite from the existence of HAuCl4·4H2O in the reaction medium was selected for designing an enzymeless sensor on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for H2O2 detection.

Methods

Aniline and ammonium peroxydisulfate were obtained from Xi’an Chemical Reagent Company (Xi’an, China). Chloroauric acid hydrated (HAuCl4·4H2O), chloroplatinic acid hydrated (H2PtCl6·6H2O), and p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Reagent Company (Shanghai, China). H2O2 (30 wt.%) was obtained from Tianjin Chemical Reagent Company (Tianjin, China). Nafion, a 5-wt.% solution in a mixture of lower aliphatic alcohols and 20% water, was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Before use, it was diluted with 0.5 wt.% isopropanol. All the reagents were of analytical grade, aniline was purified by distillation under reduced pressure and stored in a refrigerator, and all other chemicals and solvents were used as received without further purification. Phosphate buffer saline (PBS; 0.1 M) was prepared by mixing stock solutions of NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4.

A typical solid-state synthesis process for the composites was as follows (as shown in Figure 1): 1 mL aniline was added quickly to the mortars containing p-TSA (1.9 g). After grinding for about 10 min, 0.1 g yellowish-red crystalloid HAuCl4·4H2O (10.0 wt.% of the aniline monomer) and 1 mL H2O were added and ground homogeneously for 5 min, then 2.28 g was added, and the mixture was further ground for 30 min. The obtained powder was washed with ethanol and distilled water until the filtrate was colorless, and then the powder was dried under vacuum at 60°C for 48 h. The obtained hybrid materials were denoted as PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), which indicated that the composite was prepared from the reaction system with the existence of HAuCl4·4H2O. In a similar manner, we also prepared the composite with the presence of the same amount of H2PtCl6·6H2O (10.0 wt.% of the aniline monomer) in the reaction medium, and the composite was denoted as PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O), which indicated that the composite was prepared from the reaction system with the existence of H2PtCl6·6H2O. Pure PANI had also been prepared using the above-mentioned procedure. The yield of samples were 0.56 and 0.47 g for the PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O), respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic of solid-state method synthesis of PANI(HAuCl 4 ·4H 2 O) hybrid material.

The FTIR spectra of the composites were obtained using a Bruker Equinox-55 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) (frequency range 4,000 to 500 cm−1). The UV-vis spectra of the samples were recorded on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV4802, Unico, Dayton, NJ, USA). XRD patterns have been obtained using a Bruker AXS D8 diffractometer with monochromatic Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 0.15418 nm), the scan range (2θ) was 5° to 70°. SEM measurements were performed on a Leo 1430VP microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with Oxford Instruments (Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). EDS experiments were carried out with a pellet which was pressed at 200 MPa and then adhered to copper platens.

A three-electrode system was employed to study the electrochemical performances of composites. Pt electrode was used as a counter electrode and saturated calomel electrode as a reference electrode. PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)-modified GCE (diameter = 3 mm) was used as a working electrode. The working electrode was fabricated by placing a 5-μL dispersion (30 mg/L) on a bare GCE surface and air-dried for 10 min. All the experiments were carried out at ambient temperature and air atmosphere.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of the pure PANI, PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O). As shown in Figure 2, the FTIR spectra of PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O) are almost identical to that of PANI. The band at approximately 3,235 cm−1 is attributable to the N-H stretching vibration [18], while the two bands appearing at approximately 1,580 and 1,493 cm−1 are associated to the stretching vibration of nitrogen quinoid (Q) and benzenoid (B) rings, respectively [19]. The band at approximately 1,315 cm−1 can be assigned to the C-N mode [20], while the band at approximately 1,146 cm−1 is the characteristic band of the stretching vibration of quinoid, and the band appearing at approximately 820 cm−1 is attributed to an aromatic C-H out-of-plane bending vibration [19].

Figure 2
figure 2

FTIR spectra. Curves (a) PANI, (b) PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and (c) PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O).

Generally, the Q/B (I~1,580 cm−1/I~1493 cm−1) value indicates the oxidation degree of PANI [21]. A comparison indicates that the composites exhibit a higher intensity ratio of Q to B ring modes than pure PANI, suggesting that there are more quinoid units in the composites than pure PANI. This result can be attributed to the adding of HAuCl4 and H2PtCl6, which can serve not only as the resource of metal particles, but also as strong oxidants, which can enhance the oxidation degree of the PANI in composites [22, 23].

Figure 3 represents the UV-vis absorption spectra of PANI, PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O) in m-cresol solution. The characteristic peaks of PANI and composites at approximately 320 to 330 nm, approximately 430 to 445 nm, and 820 to 870 nm are attributed to π-π*, polaron-π*, and π-polaron transitions, respectively [18]. Feng et al. reported that pure Au nanoparticles usually show an absorption peak at approximately 510 nm as a result of the surface plasmon resonance [24], whereas Pt nanoparticles usually have no absorption peak at 300 to 1,000 nm [25, 26]. However, in this case, the surface plasmon resonance bands of Au nanoparticles are not observed, which may be caused by the changing of their surrounding environment [7]. However, the absorption peaks of π-polaron change significantly, and the intensity ratio (A820–870/A320–330) of the composites is higher than PANI, indicating that the doping level of the PANI in composites is higher than that of pure PANI [27]. Therefore, the results from the UV-vis absorption spectra imply that the HAuCl4 or H2PtCl6 have certain effects on the polymer chains.

Figure 3
figure 3

UV-vis spectra. Curves (a) PANI, (b) PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and (c) PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O).

Figure 4 is the EDS of the composites. It can be concluded from Figure 4 that the Au and Pt elements do exist in the polymer matrix, and the weight percentages are 7.65 and 6.07 for Au and Pt elements, respectively. Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of PANI, PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O). As indicated in Figure 5, the PANI exhibits two peaks at 2θ approximately 20° and approximately 26°, which are ascribed to the periodicity parallel and perpendicular to the polymer chains, respectively [28]. In the case of PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), the strong peaks appeared at 2θ values of 38°, 44°, and 64.5° which can be assigned to Bragg's reflections from the (111), (200), and (220) planes of metal Au [3]. These Bragg's reflections are in good agreement with the data (JCPDS-ICCD, 870720), which can further prove the existence of Au nanoparticles in the PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O). However, there is no characteristic Bragg's reflection for metal Pt in the case of PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O), which is a similar phenomenon to that of Pt nanoparticles deposited on carbon nanotubes using PANI as dispersant and stabilizer [29]. Combined with the results from EDS analysis, it can be concluded that the Pt element may exist in the form of [PtCl6]2−, [PtCl5(H2O)], and [PtCl4(H2O)2] in the polymer matrix because the deprotonation reaction of the aqua ligands of H2PtCl6 are fully suppressed by the high concentration of protons in the reaction system by solid-state method [30]. However, these interesting results indicate the potential application of the solid-state method for polymer complex such as PANI-type conducting polymers Pt(IV) complexes. The general reactions for the reduction of HAuCl4 and H2PtCl6 by PANI in this reaction are illustrated in Figure 6[7, 31].

Figure 4
figure 4

EDS spectra of composites. (a) PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) and (b) PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O).

Figure 5
figure 5

XRD patterns. Curves (a) PANI, (b) PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O), and (c) PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O).

Figure 6
figure 6

Schematic of a possible mechanism for the formation of hybrid materials of PANI(HAuCl 4 ·4H 2 O) and PANI(H 2 PtCl 6 ·6H 2 O).

Figure 7 indicates the SEM and TEM images of the PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O). As shown in the SEM and TEM images, the size and shape of PANI particles are irregular. Some Au nanoparticles (the bright spots in Figure 7a) disperse better in the surface of the PANI matrix. However, based on the results of EDS analysis, it can be concluded that the total amount of Au nanoparticles (7.65 wt.%) is not very well consistent with the estimated value of 10 wt.% (assuming all the Au salt is converted to Au(0)). If one considers the conversion rate of Au salt to Au nanoparticles in this solid-state reaction, the value of conversion rate is about 89.6% (Conversion rate = (Yield of sample) × (Elemental percentage of Au)/(Au in 100 mg HAuCl4·4H2O)). In addition, it is evident from Figure 7c that the size of the Au nanoparticles (the sand-like dark spots in Figure 7c) is about 20 nm. However, in the case of PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O), there are not any Pt metal particles found in either SEM or TEM images. This phenomenon is consistent with the results of XRD patterns.

Figure 7
figure 7

TEM and SEM images of PANI(HAuCl 4 ·4H 2 O) and PANI(H 2 PtCl 6 ·6H 2 O). (a) SEM and (c) TEM images of PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O); (b) SEM and (d) TEM images of PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O).

Figure 8 shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI, PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O), and PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O) electrodes measured from −0.2 to 0.8 V in 1 M H2SO4 electrolyte. Overall, the redox peaks of composites are similar to the pure PANI, indicating that the HAuCl4 and H2PtCl6 cannot affect the formation of PANI in composites. However, a comparison demonstrates that the oxidation peak currents of composites are higher than those of pure PANI and shift negatively to a lower potential range than those of pure PANI. This phenomenon can be associated to the higher oxidation degree and doping level of the PANI in composites than that of pure PANI, which can improve the electrochemical activity of composites. Moreover, the oxidation potential of PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) shifts to lower potential than those of others, which may be a result of the Au nanoparticles possibly enhancing the flow ability of electron in the polymer chain [2].

Figure 8
figure 8

CV curves of PANI (a), PANI(HAuCl 4 ·4H 2 O) (b), and PANI(H 2 PtCl 6 ·6H 2 O) (c) in 1 M H 2 SO 4 electrolyte. Scan rate is 3 mV s−1. Mass of the active material is 3 mg, and graphite current collector was used (area 1 cm2) as the working electrode.

As the XRD patterns of PANI(H2PtCl6·6H2O) did not show any characteristic Bragg's reflection for metal Pt, the PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) was selected as a type of catalyzing electrode material, and an enzymeless H2O2 sensor was assembled by the dripping of the dispersion of PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O) on a GCE surface. Figure 9 shows the electrocatalytic responses of bare GCE and PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)/GCE in 0.1 M PBS at pH 6.8 with and without 10 mM H2O2. It is clear that that there is no evident redox peak observed on a bare GCE which is due to the lack of substance with electrochemical activity. On the contrary, the PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)/GCE shows a pair of reduction (5 μA at −0.15 V) and oxidation (3 μA at 0.15 V) peak currents. It is common that PANI showed one pair of peaks in neutral pH environment [32]. It is also important to note that both the reduction and oxidation current for PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)/GCE increased after addition of H2O2. These observations indicate that PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)/GCE can act as catalysts for both the reduction and oxidation of H2O2.

Figure 9
figure 9

CV curves of bare GCE and PANI(HAuCl 4 ·4H 2 O)/GCE. GCE (curve a) and PANI(HAuCl4·4H2O)/GCE in 0.1 M PBS at pH 6.8 without (curve b) and with (curve c)10 mM H2O2. Scan rate is 50 mV s−1.

The amperometric response of the enzymeless H2O2 amperometric sensor was investigated by successively adding H2O2 to a continuous stirring of 20 mL 0.1 M PBS at pH 6.8. Figure 10 demonstrates the typical current-time curve of the enzymeless sensor. As can be seen in Figure 10, a sharp increase in the current is observed in negative within a response time of less than 5 s after each addition of H2O2 direction, which is lower than the amperometric response(<2 s) of enzyme biosensor based on in situ electrosynthesized PANI/Au core-shell nanocomposite [14]. However, the linear regression equation was i = −0.9256 − 0.0057[H2O2] (mM), with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 (inset b in Figure 10). This reveals that this non-enzymatic sensor shows similar performance in terms of wide linear range compared with enzyme-based biosensor [14].

Figure 10
figure 10

Amperometric response of the enzymeless sensor to H 2 O 2 . The applied potential is −0.2 V in 0.1 M PBS at pH 6.8. Inset (a) shows a magnification of the 120 to 400 s additions of H2O2, and inset (b) shows the steady-state current vs. H2O2 concentration.

Conclusions

In this paper, the synthesis of the polyaniline/noble metal hybrid materials by solid-state method in the presence of HAuCl4·4H2O or H2PtCl6·6H2O in the reaction system was investigated. These composites were characterized by FTIR, UV-vis, X-ray, TEM, SEM, and EDS as well as by the electrochemical measurements. The results showed that the strong oxidation ability of HAuCl4·4H2O and H2PtCl6·6H2O was a main factor in increasing the oxidation degree and doping level of the PANI in composites. Furthermore, the results also indicated that the HAuCl4·4H2O can be converted into Au nanoparticles, while that of the H2PtCl6·6H2O cannot be converted into metal Pt, suggesting the formation of [PtCl6]2−, [PtCl5(H2O)], and [PtCl4(H2O)2] in the polymer matrix. Compared with the existing methods, the method demonstrated here was facile but effective and could be readily used for a large-scale preparation of the PANI/Au. However, the PANI/Pt was not successfully synthesized by this solid-sate method which may be a result of the fully suppressed deprotonation reaction of aqua ligands of H2PtCl6 by the high concentration of protons in the reaction system. These interesting results indicated the potential application of the solid-state method for polymer complex such as PANI-type conducting polymer Pt(IV) complexes. Furthermore, the electrochemical measurements indicated that the obtained PANI/Au displayed a fast response to H2O2 and excellent performance in wide linear range. The sensor could catalyze the oxidation and reduction of H2O2 at the same time, and it exhibited a fast amperometric response (about 5 s) to the reduction of H2O2 in a wide linear range.