Skip to main content

Eco-friendly synthesis for MCM-41 nanoporous materials using the non-reacted reagents in mother liquor


Nanoporous materials such as Mobil composite material number 41 (MCM-41) are attractive for applications such as catalysis, adsorption, supports, and carriers. Green synthesis of MCM-41 is particularly appealing because the chemical reagents are useful and valuable. We report on the eco-friendly synthesis of MCM-41 nanoporous materials via multi-cycle approach by re-using the non-reacted reagents in supernatant as mother liquor after separating the solid product. This approach was achieved via minimal requirement of chemical compensation where additional fresh reactants were added into the mother liquor followed by pH adjustment after each cycle of synthesis. The solid product of each successive batch was collected and characterized while the non-reacted reagents in supernatant can be recovered and re-used to produce subsequent cycle of MCM-41. The multi-cycle synthesis is demonstrated up to three times in this research. This approach suggests a low cost and eco-friendly synthesis of nanoporous material since less waste is discarded after the product has been collected, and in addition, product yield can be maintained at the high level.


Mobil composite material number 41 (MCM-41) is a mesoporous material that was first discovered in 1992[1, 2]. It has a hexagonal array of uniformly sized one-dimensional mesopores with a pore diameter of 2 to 10 nm. The research on these nanoporous materials is of interest especially in catalysis, adsorption, supports, and carriers due to its excellent properties such as high surface area, high thermal stability, high hydrophobicity, and tunable acidity[3, 4]. Furthermore, the pore size of MCM-41 can be tailored by using surfactants with different chain lengths and/or auxiliary structure-directing agent[5, 6].

Several methods such as hydrothermal and solvothermal treatments have been used for the synthesis of MCM-41 meso-ordered material[79]. The concept of all these approaches is to terminate the synthesis process after the synthesis is complete; the nanomaterials are formed in sol suspensions and are recovered by filtration or centrifugation. The remaining synthesis solution is usually discarded after the nanoporous materials are collected. However, these conventional methods bring several drawbacks to the environment and industry. For instance, large amounts of initial reactants which remain unused in the remaining solution, including the expensive organic surfactant template, silica and corrosive solvent such as NaOH, is discarded during the recovering of mesostructured particles. This causes the synthesis of nanoporous material an uneconomical process; it is not cost effective for chemical industries. Moreover, the disposal of unused chemical reagents especially the surfactant template after the synthesis results in severe health hazard and adverse environmental effect[10, 11]. Thus, any new insight regarding the replacing, recycling, or reusing of the valuable chemicals in the synthesis of nanoporous materials is highly appreciated.

Recently, the use of electronic (e-waste)[12] and natural wastes such as coal fly ash[1317] and rice husk ash[18] as silica sources for the preparation of MCM-41 has been reported. In general, the ashes and electronic resin waste are treated with sodium hydroxide to extract the silica out before their introduction into the MCM-41 synthesis solution. With this strategy, the inorganic waste is re-used, and it can be converted into more valuable and useful materials which may have important economic implications. In the environmental aspect, converting silica waste into nanoporous materials such as MCM-41 may provide another way for preserving the environment.

Although eco-friendly synthesis on MCM-41 using natural wastes has been reported to date, there is no study on the synthesis of MCM-41 by recycling the mother liquid. One of the reasons is that the change in the molar composition and the pH of the precursor solution will have a profound impact on the resulting materials, i.e., no solid product, amorphous, new or mixture of two mesophases (lamellar, cubic, disordered) will be formed instead of the desired single hexagonal mesophase[2]. In this work, MCM-41 is prepared with a green synthesis strategy by reusing non-reacted reagents remaining in the synthesis solution followed by supplementary compensation of the consumed chemicals and pH adjustment. The chemical compositions of mother liquor and solid product of each cycle were then characterized by using dry solid mass analysis, thermogravimetry (TG)/differential thermal analysis (DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 29Si magic-angle-spinning (MAS) solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and N2 adsorption-desorption analyses.


Multi-cycle synthesis of MCM-41

The nanoporous MCM-41 powder was synthesized from an alkaline solution containing cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTABr, 98%; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium silicate solution (8% Na2O, 27% SiO2; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), H2SO4 (97%; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), and distilled water. Typically, CTABr (5.772 g) was first dissolved in a 125-mL polypropylene bottle containing distilled water (79.916 g) under stirring (Figure 1). Sodium silicate (21.206 g) was then introduced into the mixture before H2SO4 (1.679 g) was added dropwise to give a solution with a pH of 11.0 and a composition molar ratio of 1 CTABr/1.76 Na2O/6.14 SiO2/335.23 H2O. The mixture was allowed to heat in an oven at 100°C for 24 h.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of multi-cycle synthesis of MCM-41 materials.

The mother liquor was separated via filtration, and the water from the filtrate was partially evaporated at 55°C for 16 h to enable compensation analysis. For the MCM-41 wet filter cake on clay filter, the mass of water in it was estimated by measuring the mass of the solid before and after drying at 60°C for 14 h. The dried solid was then allowed to redisperse again in water, and the solid product was purified by washing with distilled water until the pH of the solid became 7.0. The purified solid was dried at 80°C overnight, and the mass of purified solid was measured again.

Prior to the second and third synthesis cycles, the chemical composition of the non-reacted solutions was analyzed (please refer to the ‘Characterization’ subsection) and was adjusted to the original one by adding the required amount of CTABr, sodium silicate, and water. The H2SO4 was then added slowly under stirring until a pH of approximately 11.0 was reached using a pH meter (Ohaus Starter 3000, Parsippany, NJ, USA) to monitor the pH of the solution. The MCM-41 nanoporous materials prepared from the first, second, and third synthesis cycles will be denoted as M-1, M-2, and M-3, respectively.

The organic template in the as-synthesized MCM-41 was removed and recovered through extraction by refluxing the solid (1.5 g) in 1 M hydrobromic acid ethanolic solution (500 mL) at 75°C for 24 h. The template-free MCM-41 was filtered, washed with ethanol, and dried for 10 h at 100°C in vacuum[19]. On the other hand, the ethanol in the filtrate solution was distilled out at 80°C, and the surfactant was recrystallized in a mixture solution of acetone/ethanol (95:5 in volume) after the acid in the solution was neutralized[20]. The recrystallized CTABr white solid was purified with ethanol and dried at 70°C overnight.


X-ray powder diffraction patterns were recorded using a Siemens D5000 Kristalloflex diffractometer (Munich, Germany) with a monochromated Cu Kα radiation in the angular range from 1.7° to 10° (2θ) with a scanning speed of 0.02°·s−1. TEM was performed using a Philips CM-12 microscope (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. The silica content was measured using an AAnalyst 200 atomic absorption spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The organic template moiety in the sample was determined using a Mettler TGA SDTA851 instrument (Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) with a heating rate of 10°C·min−1 under nitrogen flow. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis was conducted using a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument (Norcross, GA, USA). The template-free sample was first degassed at 250°C for 3 h followed by nitrogen adsorption measurement at −196°C. The surface physicochemical properties were then calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) models[21]. Solid-state 29Si-MAS-NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Ultrashield 300 spectrometer (Madison, WI, USA) operating at 300 MHz with tetramethylsilane as a reference. The measurement was carried out at 79.4 MHz and single-contact cross-polarization pulse program was used. The spectra were acquired with a pulse length of 2.7 μs, a repetition time of 6 s, and a contact time of 4 ms. The FTIR spectra of the as-synthesized solid products were obtained with a PerkinElmer spectrometer (System 2000) using the KBr pellet technique (KBr/sample weight ratio = 150:1).

Results and discussion

The chemical composition of the initial and re-used solutions characterized by dry mass, AAS, and TG/DTA analyses is summarized in Table 1. As can be seen, large amounts of silicate solution (approximately 15 g) and CTABr (approximately 3.5 g) were consumed for three subsequent synthesis cycles of MCM-41. Initially, the CTABr was dissolved in distilled water, and silica was precipitated out after sodium silicate was added into the CTABr solution. At this stage, silicate oligomers act as multidentate ligands with high charge density at head groups, which leads to a lamellar organization of the surfactant[22]. As the acid is introduced, polycondensation and polymerization of silica take place, resulting in the dissolution of lamellar phase. At pH close to 11.0, this dissolution is followed by the formation of the hexagonal MCM-41 material[22, 23].

Table 1 Compensated chemicals added into non-reacted mother liquor for MCM-41 synthesis cycles and MCM-41 solid yield

pH was determined to be the most important of the investigated synthesis parameters in affecting pore ordering and mesophase. The solubility and the rate of dissolution of silica increases with the increasing pH resulted in a decrease of the total interfacial area and a more long-range pore ordering[24, 25]. High pH results in fast and complete hydrolysis where polymerization can occur within a few minutes[25]. When the pH of the precursor solution decreased (higher acidity), it was observed that the intensity of diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern decreased, suggesting a considerable decrease of pore ordering.

It is important to note that little to no-solid product was formed in the re-used mother liquor before chemical compensation due to insufficient chemicals present in the precursor solution. Thus, supplementary compensation of the consumed chemicals onto mother liquor and pH adjustment are needed before proceeding to the second cycle of synthesis. One should note that amorphous, lamellar, or cubic phase was obtained as single or mixed products when the chemical composition and the pH of the solution were not correctly adjusted (e.g., template/H2O ratio is high).

The ordered mesoporosity of MCM-41 solids for three subsequent cycles is confirmed by XRD analysis (Figure 2). The XRD pattern of all as-synthesized MCM-41 molecular sieves exhibits an intense signal at 2θ = 2.2° corresponding to (100) plane and three small signals between 3.5° and 6.0° due to (110), (200), and (210) planes which confirm the presence of well-defined hexagonal MCM-41[1, 2]. Neither lamellar or cubic phase nor amorphous products were observed in the diffractograms, showing that only MCM-41 solids were obtained as pure hexagonal phase after the chemical compositions in the three subsequent synthesis cycles were adjusted to the desired molar ratio and pH. On the other hand, less intense and broadened diffraction peaks were observed for both M-2 and M-3, and this revealed that the ordering degree of both samples slightly decreased in comparison with M-1. Nevertheless, the characteristic diffraction peaks of both samples were retained, indicating that the long-range order of nanoporous hexagonal channels was still preserved after chemical compensation. Also, small peak shifting towards lower diffraction angle was also detected in these two samples which could be explained by a slight increase in the pore size as a result of varied packing of the nanoporous silica particles[25].

Figure 2

XRD patterns and TEM images (inset) of as-synthesized MCM-41 nanomaterials synthesized from three subsequent cycles. (a) M-1, (b) M-2, and (c) M-3. Scale bar = 50 nm.

The XRD results were further confirmed by TEM analysis. Long-range order of the hexagonal pore arrays could be seen in M-1, and the observation was well agreed with the XRD study (inset of Figure 2a). On the other hand, M-2 and M-3 showed a lower ordering degree than M-1. Nevertheless, the hexagonal periodicity of the mesophase of three MCM-41 samples was basically maintained.

The solid yield of the MCM-41 silica materials for the three subsequent cycles was calculated to be 73.6, 71.9, and 78.3 wt.%, respectively, according to dry mass solid analysis (Table 1). Thus, the solid product yield was considerably high and constant for three subsequent cycles. These results are suggesting that the re-use of the non-reacted precursor solutions is possible as the surfactant template is completely preserved and does not decompose during hydrothermal treatment at mild hydrothermal condition (100°C). Additionally, no organic template and inorganic solution are disposed to the environment, and the chemicals are re-used entirely (CTABr surfactant occluded in MCM-41 framework is extracted out and can be re-used after purification), and thus, this method is revealed as benign to the environment.

Figure 3 shows the IR spectra of the three MCM-41 samples. It was observed that the as-synthesized M-1, M-2, and M-3 displayed similar absorption bands. The broad signal at 3,397 cm−1 was assigned to water O-H stretching mode, and its bending vibration mode was detected at 1,646 cm−1. The presence of absorption bands at 2,928, 2,853, 1,491, 1,478, 1,468, 1,420, 1,404, and 1,377 cm−1 was due to the presence of organic template confined in MCM-41 mesopores[26].

Figure 3

Infrared spectra of as-synthesized samples for three subsequent cycles: (a) M-1, (b) M-2, and (c) M-3.

In addition, the presence of absorption bands at 1,206 and 1,056 cm−1 could be assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibrations of Si-O-Si, while the symmetric stretching vibrations of Si-O-Si resonated at 777 and 616 cm−1. Moreover, the IR band at 442 cm−1 was attributed to the bending vibration of Si-O-Si. A small signal was also detected at 964 cm−1 which was due to the bending mode of surface Si-OH. Low intensity of this signal indicated that only a small amount of silanol group was present in the MCM-41 samples[26].

A similar conclusion could also be drawn from the 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopy. The solid-state 29Si-MAS-NMR spectra of M-1, M-2, and M-3 were shown in Figure 4. All samples showed two distinct peaks at −99.7 and −109.6 ppm, which could be assigned as surface vicinal silanol groups (Q3) and framework silica (Q4), respectively[27]. Furthermore, a weak shoulder was also detected at −84.7 ppm especially for M-2 which was assigned to the surface geminal groups (Q2). The relative peak areas of the spectra and the Q4/Q3 ratio were calculated and were given in Table 2. From the deconvoluted data, M-1 had the highest Q4/Q3 ratio (0.75), indicating M-1 had the most ordered structure in the nanoporous framework. In contrast, M-2 showed the lowest Q4/Q3 ratio (0.64) which could be explained by a lower degree of polycondensation of the silicate species. The finding agrees with those determined from the XRD and TEM data (Figure 2b).

Figure 4

29 Si MAS NMR spectra of as-synthesized (a) M-1, (b) M-2, (c) M-3, and (d) deconvolution of spectrum M-1.

Table 2 29 Si-MAS-NMR deconvolution results

TG analysis is a powerful analytical technique that can be used to determine the organic components of a material by monitoring the weight loss as the specimen is heated. Using this technique, the amount of organic template is consumed in the synthesis (occluded in as-synthesized MCM-41), thus can be estimated (Note: the quantity of template lost during the purification process of the samples is also taken into account). It was found that the CTA+/SiO2 molar ratios of M-1, M-2, and M-3 were 0.16, 0.14, and 0.13, respectively, which were in the range of 0.1 to 0.2, a value previously found for a well-organized hexagonal mesophase[25]. From this chemical analysis, it appeared that six to eight SiO groups compensated one CTA+ organic cation.

The TG curves of three as-synthesized samples had a similar shape with slight difference in the percentage of weight loss (please refer to Additional file1: Figure S1). In the first stage, the weight loss of approximately 6% at below 130°C was attributed to desorption of water. In the second (weight loss of 33% to 38% at 130°C to 340°C) and third (weight loss of approximately 4% at 340°C to 550°C) stages, the weight losses were due to the thermal decomposition of organic template via Hofmann elimination[28]. In the fourth stage, at the temperature above 500°C, the weight loss was caused by the condensation of silanol groups to form siloxane bonds[29]. From the TG results, it can be summarized that the MCM-41 nanoporous silica synthesized from three subsequent cycles contained almost the same amount of template (total weight loss of 36 to 41 wt.% in the range of 120°C to 500°C), demonstrating that the consumption of the organic template during the formation of MCM-41 was almost constant in each step of the multi-cycle synthesis.

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for the MCM-41 nanoporous materials were of type IV with type H1 hybrid loop[30] in accordance with IUPAC classification (Figure 5). A sharp adsorption-desorption step at P/Po range of 0.3 to 0.35 was observed for all the solids due to pore filling of uniform pores of hexagonal lattice. Table 3 showed that M-1, M-2, and M-3 had high surface areas (above 500 m2·g−1) and pore volumes (above 0.60 cm3·g−1), which could be explained by their high degree of ordering. Among the three samples, the M-2 and M-3 possessed higher pore volume over M-1. The difference in the total pore volume of these samples was attributed to the varied packing of the nanoporous silica particles[25]. The pore size distribution of the primary nanopores based on BJH calculation method for M-1, M-2, and M-3 was measured (inset of Figure 5). All samples showed a narrow pore distribution wherein M-3 offered the largest pore size (highest peak centered at 2.72 nm) among the three synthesized samples, and M-1 had the smallest pore size (approximately 2.62 nm).

Figure 5

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and BJH pore diameter distribution (inset) of MCM-41 meso-ordered materials synthesized from three subsequent cycles: (a) M-1, (b) M-2 and (c) M-3. Solid symbols denoted adsorption, and open symbols denoted desorption.

Table 3 Textural properties of the MCM-41 samples

A scheme representing the total utilization of chemical reagents for conventional one-step and multi-step syntheses of MCM-41 are illustrated in Table 4. The total consumption of reagents is calculated based on five synthesis batches or cycles of MCM-41 nanoporous solid. In the multi-step synthesis approach, it is found that the consumption of reagents can be saved and reduced up to 17.67% and 26.31% for silica source and CTABr surfactant, respectively, in comparison with the conventional single-batch approach. Thus, using multi-cycle synthesis, the synthesis cost, which is one of the major concerns in the industries, is decreased considerably. Furthermore, the chemical waste eliminated to the environment such as organic template and silicate can be decreased up to nearly 90% when multi-cycle synthesis method is employed (not shown).

Table 4 Total chemical reagents used for conventional and multi-step syntheses of MCM-41

Meanwhile, the CTABr in the as-synthesized samples was successfully recovered after solvent extraction using ethanolic solution (please refer to Additional file1: Figure S2). It was found that the product yield of CTABr after re-crystallization and purification was 84.6%. The regenerated CTABr can be re-used back for the synthesis of MCM-41 which further reduced the cost and consumption of expensive organic template. Furthermore, the ethanol solution used in organic template extraction can be distilled, separated, and re-used without disposing to the environment.

In short, the low consumption of expensive and harmful chemical reagents is demonstrated; thus, large cost saving and environment protection are achieved. Moreover, this method might offer as another green synthesis for other important nanoporous molecular sieves such as SBA-15, MCM-48, chiral mesoporous silica, KIT-1, etc., where the product yield is considerably maintained by re-using the same non-reacted initial reagents, thus decreasing the synthesis cost, making possible the chemical process to be environmentally benign.


In summary, using a simple multi-cycle method, MCM-41 nanoporous materials can be synthesized in a more eco-friendly and economical way. The obtained samples in three subsequent cycles exhibited remarkable high-BET specific surface area (above 500 m2·g−1) and high pore volume (above 0.60 cm3·g−1) while maintaining its well-ordered hexagonal mesostructure. The MCM-41 synthesized from the three subsequent batches had also almost similar degree of ordering, morphology, yield, pore size, and chemical composition.

The multi-cycle synthesis approach in this work is beneficial from the environmental perspective because the amount of waste produced is minimized by recycling synthesis materials which results in environmental problems. This approach is also beneficial in terms of economic perspective as re-use of chemical reactants reduces the production cost in chemical industries.

Authors’ information

JYG is a MSc student of the University Sains Malaysia (USM). EPN is an associate professor at the USM. TCL is a professor at the University of Malaya. RRM is an assistant professor at the Institute Teknologi Bandung.


  1. 1.

    Kresge CT, Leonowicz EM, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS: Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 1992, 359: 710–712. 10.1038/359710a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL: A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 1992, 114: 10834–10843. 10.1021/ja00053a020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Silva M, Calvete MJF, Gonçalves NPF, Burrows HD, Sarakha M, Fernandes A, Ribeiro MF, Azenha ME, Pereira MM: Zinc(II) phthalocyanines immobilized in mesoporous silica Al-MCM-41 and their applications in photocatalytic degradation of pesticides. J Hazard Mater 2012, 233: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Trouvé A, Gener IB, Valange S, Bonne M, Mignard S: Tuning the hydrophobicity of mesoporous silica materials for the adsorption of organic pollutant in aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 2012, 201–202: 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Raman NK, Anderson MT, Brinker CJ: Template-based approaches to the preparation of amorphous, nanoporous silicas. Chem Mater 1996, 8: 1682–1701. 10.1021/cm960138+

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Franke O, Rathousky J, Schulz-Ekloff G, Zukal A: Synthesis of MCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves. Stud Surf Sci Catal 1995, 91: 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yu J, Shi JL, Wang LZ, Ruan ML, Yan DS: Room temperature synthesis of mesoporous aluminosilicate materials. Ceram Inter 2000, 26: 359–362. 10.1016/S0272-8842(99)00064-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schacht P, Franco LN, Ancheyta J, Ramirez S, Perez IH, Garcia LA: Characterization of hydrothermally treated MCM-41 and Ti-MCM-41 molecular sieves. Catal Today 2004, 98: 115–121. 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.07.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zeng W, Qian XF, Zhang YB, Yin J, Zhu ZK: Organic modified mesoporous MCM-41 through solvothermal process as drug delivery system. Mater Res Bull 2005, 40: 766–772. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2005.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Isomaa B, Reuter J, Djupsund BM: The subacute and chronic toxicity of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), a cationic surfactant, in the rat. Arch Toxicol 1976, 35: 91–96. 10.1007/BF00372762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pantani C, Spreti N, Maggitti MC, Germani R: Acute toxicity of some synthetic cationic and zwitterionic surfactants to freshwater amphipod Echinogammarus tibaldii . Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1995, 55: 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liou TH: A green route to preparation of MCM-41 silicas with well-ordered mesostructure controlled in acidic and alkaline environments. Chem Eng J 2011, 171: 1458–1468. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hui KS, Chao CYH: Synthesis of MCM-41 from coal fly ash by a green approach: influence of synthesis pH. J Hazard Mater 2006, B137: 1135–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Halina M, Ramesh S, Yarmo MA, Kamarudin RA: Non-hydrothermal synthesis of mesoporous materials using sodium silicate from coal fly ash. Mater Chem Phys 2007, 101: 344–351. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chandrasekar G, You KS, Ahn JW, Ahn WS: Synthesis of hexagonal and cubic mesoporous silica using power plant bottom ash. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2008, 111: 455–462. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang HL, Chun CM, Aksay IA, Shih WH: Conversion of fly ash into mesoporous aluminosilicate. Ind Eng Chem Res 1999, 38: 973–977. 10.1021/ie980275b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kumar P, Mal N, Oumi Y, Yamana K, Sano T: Mesoporous materials prepared using coal fly ash as the silicon and aluminium source. J Mater Chem 2001, 11: 3285–3290. 10.1039/b104810b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bhagiyalakshmi M, Yun LJ, Anuradha R, Jang HT: Utilization of rice husk ash as silica source for the synthesis of mesoporous silicas and their application to CO2 adsorption through TREN/TEPA grafting. J Hazard Mater 2010, 175: 928–938. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ng EP, Mohd Subari SN, Marie O, Mukti RR, Juan JJ: Sulfonic acid functionalized MCM-41 as solid acid catalyst for tert -butylation of hydroquinone enhanced by microwave heating. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2012, 450: 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mendonza AM, Warzywoda J, Sacco A: Investigation of structural order and morphology of MCM-41 mesoporous silica using an experimental design methodology. J Porous Mater 2006, 13: 37–47. 10.1007/s10934-006-5488-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Oye G, Sjoblom J, Stöcker M: A multivariate analysis of the synthesis conditions of mesoporous materials. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2000, 34: 291–299. 10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00181-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mody HM, Kannan S, Bajaj HC, Manu V, Jasra RV: A simple room temperature synthesis of MCM-41 with enhanced thermal and hydrothermal stability. J Porous Mater 2008, 15: 571–579. 10.1007/s10934-007-9135-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McKittrick MW, Jones CW: Towards single-site functional materials - preparation of amine-functionalized surfaces exhibiting site-isolated behavior. Chem Mater 2003, 15: 1132–1139. 10.1021/cm020952z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Daehler A, Boskovic S, Gee ML, O'Connor AJ, Separovic F, Stevens GW: Postsynthesis vapor-phase functionalization of MCM-48 with hexamethyldisilazane and 3-aminopropyldimethylethoxylsilane for bioseparation applications. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 16263–16271. 10.1021/jp0511799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Voegtlin AC, Ruch F, Guth JL, Patarin J, Huve L: F mediated synthesis of mesoporous silica with ionic- and non-ionic surfactants a new templating pathway. Micropor Mater 1997, 9: 95–105. 10.1016/S0927-6513(96)00093-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ng EP, Nur H, Muhid MNM, Hamdan H: Sulphated AlMCM-41: mesoporous solid brønsted acid catalyst for dibenzoylation of biphenyl. Catal Today 2006, 114: 257–262. 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jones MD, Duer MJ: 29Si cross polarisation magic angle spinning spectroscopic studies on MCM-41 supported with metal carbonyl clusters. Inorg Chim Acta 2003, 354: 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kleitz F, Schmidt W, Schüth F: Calcination behavior of different surfactant-templated mesostructured silica materials. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2003, 65: 1–29. 10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00506-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Selvaraj M, Pandurangan A, Seshadri KS, Sinha PK, Lal KB: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic application of MCM-41mesoporous molecular sieves containing Zn and Al. Appl Catal A: Gen 2003, 242: 347–364. 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00527-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kruk M, Jaroniec M, Sayari A: Adsorption study of surface and structural properties of MCM-41 materials of different pore sizes. J Phys Chem B 1997, 101: 583–589. 10.1021/jp962000k

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful for the financial support from FRGS (203/PKIMIA/6711185) grant.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eng-Poh Ng.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JYG carried out the main experimental work. EPN supervised the research activity and organized the manuscript. JYG and RRM did the chemical characterization. RRM, TCL, and EPN participated in the discussion of results and helped make critical comments in the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, E., Goh, J., Ling, T.C. et al. Eco-friendly synthesis for MCM-41 nanoporous materials using the non-reacted reagents in mother liquor. Nanoscale Res Lett 8, 120 (2013).

Download citation


  • MCM-41
  • Green synthesis
  • Mother liquor
  • Chemical compensation
  • Chemical waste