Open Access

Facile synthesis of ultrathin magnetic iron oxide nanoplates by Schikorr reaction

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:16

Received: 12 October 2012

Accepted: 14 December 2012

Published: 7 January 2013


In this work, a very facile one-pot hydrothermal synthesis approach has been developed for the preparation of ultrathin magnetite nanoplates. The hydrothermal procedure was performed by aging ferrous hydroxide under anaerobic conditions, which is known as Schikorr reaction. Ethylene glycol (EG), which was introduced to the reaction as another solvent, played a critical role in the formation process of these nanoplates. Typically, hexagonal Fe3O4 nanoplates with a thickness of 10 to 15 nm and a side length of 150 to 200 nm have been synthesized with EG/H2O = 1:1 in experiments. Our data suggest that the thickness of Fe3O4 nanoplates decreases, and the shape of the nanoplate becomes more irregular when the concentration of EG increases. The as-prepared Fe3O4 nanoplates were highly crystallized single crystals and exhibited large coercivity and specific absorption rate coefficient.


Magnetite nanoplates Schikorr reaction Ethylene glycol Ferrous hydroxide


Magnetite (Fe3O4) is an attractive material for essential applications such as magnetic storage, ferrofluids, catalysts, chemical sensor, biological assays, and hyperthermia because of its magnetic features combined with nanosize and surface effects[19]. To date, a number of nanosized magnetite crystals with a variety of morphologies, such as nanoparticles, nanospheres, hollow spheres, nanorods, nanowires, nanotubes, nanorings, nanopyramids, nano-octahedra, and flowerlike nanostructures, have been prepared by a variety of chemistry-based processing routes, including coprecipitation, thermal decomposition, microemulsion, electrochemical synthesis, and solvothermal or hydrothermal synthesis[1015]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are only limited reports concerning the synthesis of ultrathin magnetite nanoplate and its interesting properties. Chen's group synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoplates by a solvothermal process using ethanol as solvent and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) as stabilizer, followed by a reduction process to generate Fe3O4 nanoplates[16]. Xu and coworkers prepared triangular Fe3O4 nanoplates between two carbon films by pyrolyzing ferrocene and sodium oxalate at 600°C[17].

In this work, we report a facile one-pot hydrothermal approach for the preparation of magnetite nanoplates by the famous Schikorr reaction. Under anaerobic conditions, iron(II) hydroxide can be oxidized by the protons of water to form iron(II,III) oxide and molecular hydrogen. This process is described by the Schikorr reaction[1820]:
3 Fe OH 2 Fe 3 O 4 + H 2 + 2 H 2 O

The Schikorr reaction usually occurs in the process of anaerobic corrosion of iron and carbon steel in various conditions[21, 22]. Herein, this reaction was used to prepare magnetite nanoplates. In addition, ethylene glycol (EG) was introduced to this reaction as another solvent besides H2O to adjust the morphology and thickness of the products. In a typical procedure, a FeSO4 water solution was added to a H2O-EG mixture containing NaOH at a constant rate and under stirring after nitrogen was bubbled through the two solutions for 2 h. When the precipitation was completed, the system was undisturbed and heated to 90°C for 24 h.



All chemicals used in our experiments were purchased and used as received without further purification. Iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O, 99+%), ethylene glycol (C2H6O2, 99%), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 98%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4, >92%) was purchased from Shanghai Ling-Feng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Changshu City, China).


In the typical synthetic procedure of the Fe3O4 nanoplates, nitrogen is bubbled through two solutions independently: (a) 54 ml of water-EG mixture containing NaOH to obtain the final concentration of 0.22 M NaOH and (b) 6 ml of FeSO4·7H2O dissolved in 10−2 M H2SO4 to obtain the final concentration of 2. 4 × 10−2 M. After 2 h, the iron(II) sulfate solution was added to the basic solution at a constant rate and under stirring. When the precipitation was completed, nitrogen was allowed to pass for another 3 min, and the system was undisturbed and heated to 90°C for 24 h in a Teflon autoclave. Aging time was fixed at 24 h in order to reach conditions near equilibrium. At this point, the solution was cooled at room temperature with an ice bath, and the solid was separated by magnetic decantation and washed several times with distilled water.


The morphology and microstructure were characterized using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV and a Zeiss Ultra Plus field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with in-lens capabilities, using nitrogen gas and ultrahigh-resolution BSE imaging. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Rigaku D/Max 2200PC diffractometer (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with a graphite monochromator and CuKR radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on a PHI-5300 ESCA spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The infrared spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet-5700 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR; Thermo Scientific, Logan, UT, USA). The micro-Raman analyses were performed on a Renishaw Invis Reflex (Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK) system equipment with Peltier-cooled charge-coupled device and a Leica confocal microscope (Leica, Solms, Germany). The magnetic properties were measured at room temperature using a vibration sample magnetometer (7404, LakeShore, Westerville, OH, USA). To investigate the specific absorption rate (SAR) coefficient of the nanoplates, the calorimetric measurements were performed on an alternating current (AC) magnetic field generator (model SPG-10-I, Shenzhen Shuangping, Guangdong, China; 10 kW, 100 to 300 kHz).

Results and discussion

The XRD pattern (Figure1a) of the obtained material proves its crystalline nature of face-centered cubic structure, and the peaks match well with standard Fe3O4 reflections (JCPDS card no. 86–1354)[23]. XPS was then used to determine the product because XPS is very sensitive to Fe2+ and Fe3+ cations. The representative XPS spectra (Figure1b) of the prepared product indicate that the levels of Fe2p3/2 and Fe2p1/2 are 711.28 and 724.64 eV. It is in agreement with the literature that the peaks shift to high binding energy and broaden for Fe3O4 due to the appearance of Fe2+(2p3/2) and Fe2+(2p1/2)[24]. IR and Raman analyses (Figure2) were employed to further confirm whether the product was magnetite rather than the other oxide or oxyhydroxide of iron. The IR spectra of the product (Figure2a) display one peak at around 570 cm−1; this peak is attributed to the Fe-O functional group of Fe3O4, whereas α-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3 exhibit two or three peaks between 500 and 700 cm−1[25, 26], which are different from Fe3O4. Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study the internal structure of molecules and structures. Various iron oxides and oxyhydroxides can be successfully identified using Raman spectroscopy[27]. Figure2b shows the Raman spectrum of the product dried on Si substrate. Besides the sharp peak at 520 cm−1, which is attributed to the Si substrate, the Raman spectrum displays only one peak at 670 cm−1, which is the principal Raman band of magnetite[27, 28]. The IR and Raman analyses combined with XRD pattern and XPS spectra can confirm the synthesis of Fe3O4.
Figure 1

X-ray diffraction patterns (a) and Fe2 p XPS patterns of as-synthesized products (EG/H 2 O = 1:1) (b).

Figure 2

FTIR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of as-synthesized products (EG/H 2 O = 1:1).

Figure3a shows the SEM image of Fe3O4 products prepared with EG/H2O = 1:1 in the experiment, and it can be seen that the products exhibit a plate-like morphology with a thickness of 10 to 15 nm and a side length of 150 to 200 nm. Most of the nanoplates have hexagonal shapes, and a few are irregular polygons. TEM image of the same sample further reveals that the product consists of plate-shaped structures with a hexagonal outline, as shown in Figure3c. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure3e) was obtained directing the incident electron beam perpendicular to one hexagonal facet of an individual nanoplate, and one set of diffraction spots could be indexed as the (220) and (422) reflections, respectively, which demonstrated that the two hexagonal facets were bounded by the {111} facets. It is deduced that the growth of the nanoplates along the [111] direction would be hindered to make the {111} planes as the basal planes of the nanoplates. More detailed information on the nanoplate was acquired using high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). The HRTEM images of the area marked by rectangles are shown in Figure3d. The lattice fringes observed in the images are about 0.24 nm, which agree well with the separation between the (211) lattice planes of magnetite. The SAED and HRTEM analyses reveal that the as-prepared sample has a cubic structure.
Figure 3

Low- (a) and high-magnification (b) SEM images of the as-prepared Fe 3 O 4 nanoplates (EG/H 2 O = 1:1). The thickness of the nanoplate is about 14 nm. (c) TEM image of the same nanoplate sample. (d) HRTEM image of the marked area shown in (c). Both the HRTEM image (d) and the SAED pattern (e) show that the nanoplate is a single crystal.

Ferrous hydroxide (Fe(OH)2) is the crucial precursor of the reaction. Ferrous hydroxide has a cadmium iodide structure with a space grouping of P3m1[29]. Fe atoms occupy only one set of octahedra out of two between the anion layers A and B of the ABAB stacking sequence. The layer structure of ferrous hydroxide makes it tend to form sheet- or plate-shaped crystal. Ethylene glycol is a strong reducing agent with a relatively high boiling point and has been widely used in the polyol process to provide monodispersed fine metal or metal oxide nanoparticles[3034]. Further studies indicate that the concentration of EG plays an important role in the formation of precursor Fe(OH)2 and the end product Fe3O4 nanoplate. In the chemical reaction scheme, ferrous hydroxide is typically prepared by adding FeSO4 water solution to a NaOH solution. We investigated the morphology and structure of the as-obtained precipitate by TEM, SEM, and SAED, respectively. When the solvent of the whole system is only water (none of EG), a dark-green precipitate is produced immediately after the FeSO4 solution is dropped into excessive NaOH solution. In contrast to pure aqueous solution, the precipitate of ferrous hydroxide in the H2O-EG mixture solution was white at the beginning and turns green then dark-green gradually. The precipitate of ferrous hydroxide obtained in pure aqueous solution is also known as ‘green rust’ in the crystal lattice of which iron(II) ions are easily substituted by iron(III) ions produced by its progressive oxidation[3537]. However, the oxidation process is inhibited in the H2O-EG mixture solution because of the reducing power of EG. All forms of green rust are more complex and variable than the ideal iron(II) hydroxide compound. TEM images of the precipitate (Figure4a) obtained in pure aqueous solution show that there are two kinds of products at least; one of them is a very thin nanoplate with a diameter of about 50 nm, and the other is a needle-shaped nanoparticle. TEM and SEM images (Figures4b and5a,b) of the end product of this precipitate after aging for 24h in 90°C show that the obtained product is a mixture of polygonal particles and fiber-like particles. The sizes of the polygonal particles are about 50 to 100 nm. However, no rod-like or fiber-like nanoparticles can be found in the TEM and SEM images of the as-obtained ferrous hydroxide precipitate (Figure4c,d) in the H2O-EG mixture solution. Ferrous hydroxide obtained in the H2O-EG mixture solution forms a large-scaled film rather than plate-like and rod-like nanoparticles in pure aqueous solution. Also, according to its SAED pattern (Figure4e), the ferrous hydroxide film has a polycrystalline structure. TEM and SEM images of the Fe3O4 nanoplate obtained in the EG-H2O mixture solution with the ratio of EG/H2O = 3:1 and 5:1 are shown in Figure5c,d,e,f. It can be seen that the thickness of the Fe3O4 nanoplates decreases, and the shape of the nanoplate becomes more irregular when the concentration of EG increases. From the analysis of the above experiments, it is obvious that the addition of EG affects the formation of Fe3O4 nanoplate.
Figure 4

Fe(OH) 2 and the as-prepared Fe 3 O 4 . (a) TEM images of Fe(OH)2and (b) low-magnification SEM images of the as-prepared Fe3O4obtained in pure aqueous solution. It can be seen that the product is a mixture of polygonal particles and fiber-like particles. (c) SEM and (d) TEM images and (e) the SAED pattern of Fe(OH)2 obtained in the EG-H2O mixture.

Figure 5

The Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles and nanoplates prepared under different conditions. (a) TEM and (b) SEM images of the as-prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticle (EG/H2O = 0:1). (c) TEM and (d) SEM images of Fe3O4 nanoplates prepared under the condition of EG/H2O = 3:1. The diameter of the nanoplates is about 150 to 200 nm, and the thickness of the nanoplate is about 10 nm. (e) TEM and (f) SEM images of the Fe3O4 nanoplates prepared under the condition of EG/H2O = 5:1. The diameter is about 80 to 10 nm, and the thickness is about 5 nm.

The typical magnetic hysteresis loop of the Fe3O4 nanoplates obtained in EG/H2O = 1 is depicted in Figure6a. It exhibits a ferromagnetic behavior with saturation magnetization (Ms), remanent magnetization (Mr), and coercivity (Hc) values of ca. 71.6 emu/g, 18.4 emu/g, and 152.2 Oe, respectively. It is well known that the saturation magnetization and the coercive field of bulk Fe3O4 are about 85 to 100 emu/g and 115 to 150 Oe, respectively[38]. From the results, it can be seen that the saturation magnetization value is lower than that of bulk Fe3O4. The reduced value might be due to the spin canting of surface Fe atoms[3941]. Compared with bulk magnetite, the as-prepared nanoplates exhibit enhanced coercivity. The enhanced coercivity may be attributed to the large sharp anisotropic nature of the nanoplates which represents the barrier for particle remagnetization[42]. According to our earlier study, hysteresis loss of magnetite in AC magnetic field with low frequency and high amplitude can be assumed to be proportional to coercivity[43]. Thus, the as-prepared Fe3O4 nanoplates with enhanced coercivity may have enhanced hysteresis loss in AC magnetic field. We investigated the SAR coefficient of the Fe3O4 nanoplates by time-dependent calorimetric measurements. The frequency and amplitude of the magnetic field are 180 kHz and 0.95 kA/m, respectively. The temperature versus time curves of Fe3O4 nanoplate-based ferrofluids are shown in Figure6b. According to the curves, the SAR for the nanoplates was calculated using the following equation[43, 44]:
SAR = C ΔT Δt 1 m Fe
where C is the sample-specific heat capacity which is calculated as a mass weighted mean value of magnetite and water. For magnetite, Cmag = 0.937 J/g K, and for water Cwat = 4.18 J/g K. ΔTt is the initial slope of the time-dependent temperature curve. mFe is the iron content per gram of the Fe3O4 suspension solution. The obtained SAR value is 253.7 ± 27.3 W/g. This value is very high compared to the reported values of Fe3O4[43, 45] and indicates that this material is likely to be very suitable for application in tumor magnetic hyperthermia.
Figure 6

The Fe 3 O 4 nanoplates obtained in EG/H 2 O = 1. (a) Magnetic hysteresis loop measured at room temperature for the Fe3O4nanoplates (EG/H2O = 1:1). (b) Temperature versus time curves of Fe3O4 nanoplates (EG/H2O = 1:1) dispersed in aqueous solution under an AC magnetic field (0.95 kA/m, 176 kHz).


In summary, ultrathin single-crystalline Fe3O4 nanoplates can be synthesized facilely on a large scale by a hydrothermal route of Schikorr reaction. The experimental results showed that the concentration of EG played a key role in the information and adjustment of the thickness of the nanoplates. The as-prepared Fe3O4 nanoplates are highly crystallized single crystals. Also, Fe3O4 nanoplates are ferromagnetic at room temperature and exhibit large coercivity and specific absorption rate coefficient under external alternating magnetic field.



This research was supported by the National Important Science Research Program of China (no. 2011CB933503), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30970787, 31170959, and 61127002), and the Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province (Natural Science Foundation, no. BK2011036, BK2009013).

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biomaterials and Devices, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University


  1. Yang C, Wu J, Hou Y: Fe3O4nanostructures: synthesis, growth mechanism, properties and applications. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 5130. 10.1039/c0cc05862aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fried T, Shemer G, Markovich G: Ordered two-dimensional arrays of ferrite nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 1158–1161. 10.1002/1521-4095(200108)13:15<1158::AID-ADMA1158>3.0.CO;2-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ding N, Yan N, Ren CL, Chen XG: Colorimetric determination of melamine in dairy products by Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles H2O2ABTS detection system. Anal Chem 2010, 82: 5897–5899. 10.1021/ac100597sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Todorovic M, Schultz S, Wong J, Scherer A: Writing and reading of single magnetic domain per bit perpendicular patterned media. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 74: 2516–2518. 10.1063/1.123885View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zeng H, Sun S: Syntheses, properties, and potential applications of multicomponent magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18: 391. 10.1002/adfm.200701211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Elst LV, Muller RN: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 2064, 2008: 108.Google Scholar
  7. Wang Y, Teng X, Wang J, Yang H: Solvent-free atom transfer radical polymerization in the synthesis of Fe2O3@Polystyrene core−shell nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 789–793. 10.1021/nl034211oView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyeon T: Chemical synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Commun 2003, 8: 927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Gu N, Wang TH, Feng J, Yang D, Perrett S, Yan X: Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 2007, 2: 577–583.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vergés A, Costo R, Roca AG, Marco JF, Goya GF, Serna CJ: Uniform and water stable magnetite nanoparticles with diameters around the monodomain–multidomain limit. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2008, 41: 134003. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/13/134003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang HT, Ogawa T, Hasegawa D, Takahashi M: Synthesis and magnetic properties of monodisperse magnetite nanocubes. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 07d526. 10.1063/1.2833820Google Scholar
  12. Sun S, Zeng H: Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 8204–8205. 10.1021/ja026501xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sun Z, Li Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Zhao Z, Zhang K, Zhang G, Guo J, Yang B: A universal approach to fabricate various nanoring arrays based on a colloidal-crystal-assisted-lithography strategy. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18: 4036–4042. 10.1002/adfm.200801103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan H, Yi J, Yang Y, Kho K, Tan H, Shen Z, Ding J, Sun X, Olivo MC, Feng Y: Single-crystalline MFe2O4nanotubes/nanorings synthesized by thermal transformation process for biological applications. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 2798–2808. 10.1021/nn9006797View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li X, Zhang D, Chen J: Synthesis of amphiphilic superparamagnetic ferrite/block copolymer hollow submicrospheres. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128: 8382. 10.1021/ja061460gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu J, Jiao X, Chen D, Li W: Solvothermal synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4and γ-Fe2O3nanoplates. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 4012–4017. 10.1021/jp810583eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan N, Ma X, Liu X, Xu L, Qian Y: The formation of a layer of Fe3O4nanoplates between two carbon films. Carbon 2007, 45: 1839–1846. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Rihan RO, Nešić S: Erosion–corrosion of mild steel in hot caustic. Part I: NaOH solution. Corros Sci 2006, 48: 2633–2659.Google Scholar
  19. Booy M, Swaddle TW: Hydrothermal preparation of magnetite from iron chelates. Can J Chem 1978, 56: 402. 10.1139/v78-064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Schikorr G: Über die Reaktionen zwischen Eisen, seinen Hydroxyden und Wasser. Z Elektrochem 1929, 35: 65–70.Google Scholar
  21. Joshi PS, Venkateswaran G, Venkateswarlu KS, Rao KA: Stimulated decomposition of Fe(OH)2in the presence of AVT chemicals and metallic surfaces—relevance to low-temperature feedwater line corrosion. Corrosion 1993, 49: 300–309. 10.5006/1.3316053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Reardon EJ: Zerovalent irons: styles of corrosion and inorganic control on hydrogen pressure buildup. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39: 7311–7317. 10.1021/es050507fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Goya GF, Berquo TS, Fonseca FC: Static and dynamic magnetic properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 2003, 94: 3520. 10.1063/1.1599959View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Teng X, Black D, Watkins N, Gao Y, Yang H: Platinum-maghemite core-shell nanoparticles using a sequential synthesis. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 261–264. 10.1021/nl025918yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Daou TJ, Grenèche JM, Pourroy G, Buathong S, Derory A, Ulhaq-Bouillet C, Donnio B, Guillon D, Begin-Colin S: Coupling agent effect on magnetic properties of functionalized magnetite-based nanoparticles. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 5869–5875. 10.1021/cm801405nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Du N, Xu Y, Zhang H, Zhai C, Yang D: Selective synthesis of Fe2O3and Fe3O4nanowires via a single precursor: a general method for metal oxide nanowires. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1295–1300. 10.1007/s11671-010-9641-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunn DS, Bogart MB, Brossia CS, Cragnolino GA: Corrosion of iron under alternating wet and dry conditions. Corrosion 2000, 56: 470–481. 10.5006/1.3280551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Balasubramaniam R, Ramesh Kumar AV, Dillmann P: Characterization of rust on ancient Indian iron. Curr Sci 2003, 85: 1546–1555.Google Scholar
  29. Genin JM, Bauer P, Olowe AA, Rezel D: Mössbauer study of the kinetics of simulated corrosion process of iron in chlorinated aqueous solution around room temperature: the hyperfine structure of ferrous hydroxides and Green Rust I. Hyperfine Interactions 1986, 29: 1355–1360. 10.1007/BF02399485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun Y, Xia Y: Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 2002, 298: 2176–2179. 10.1126/science.1077229View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun Y, Mayers B, Herricks T, Xia Y: Polyol synthesis of uniform silver nanowires: a plausible growth mechanism and the supporting evidence. Nano Lett 2003, 3(7):955–960. 10.1021/nl034312mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu X, Gong J, Zhang L, Yu JC: Continuous size tuning of monodisperse ZnO colloidal nanocrystal clusters by a microwave-polyol process and their application for humidity sensing. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 4845–4850. 10.1002/adma.200801433View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Deng H, Li X, Peng Q, Wang X, Chen J, Li Y: Monodisperse magnetic single-crystal ferrite microspheres. Angew Chem Int Ed 2005, 44: 2782–2785. 10.1002/anie.200462551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu L, Xiao H, Zhang W, Yang G, Fu S: One-pot template-free synthesis of monodisperse and single-crystal magnetite hollow spheres by a simple solvothermal route. Crystal Growth & Design 2008, 8: 957–963. 10.1021/cg700861aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Refait P, Génin JMR: The oxidation of ferrous hydroxide in chloride-containing aqueous media and Pourbaix diagrams of green rust one. Corros Sci 1993, 34: 797–819. 10.1016/0010-938X(93)90101-LView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Refait P, Abdelmoula M, Génin JMR: Mechanisms of formation and structure of green rust one in aqueous corrosion of iron in the presence of chloride ions. Corros Sci 1998, 40: 1547–1560. 10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00066-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. McGill IR, McEnaney B, Smith DC: Crystal structure of green rust formed by corrosion of cast iron. Nature 1976, 259: 200–201. 10.1038/259200a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Smit J, Wijn HPJ: Ferrites: Physical Properties of Ferrimagnetic Oxides in Relation to Their Technical Applications. New York: Wiley; 1959.Google Scholar
  39. Daou TJ, Grenéche JM, Pourroy G, Buathong S, Derory A, Ulhaq-Bouillet C, Donnio B, Guillon D, Begin-Colin S: Coupling agent effect on magnetic properties of functionalized magnetite-based nanoparticles. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 5869–5875. 10.1021/cm801405nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Serna CJ, Bødker F, Mørup S, Morales MP, Sandiumenge F, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S: Spin frustration in maghemite nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 2001, 118: 437–440. 10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00150-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Morales MP, Serna CJ, Bødker F, Mørup S: Spin canting due to structural disorder in maghemite. J Phys Condens Matter 1997, 9: 5461–5467. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/25/013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Horng L, Chern G, Chen MC, Kang PC, Lee DS: Magnetic anisotropic properties in Fe3O4and CoFe2O4ferrite epitaxy thin films. J Magn Magn Mater 2004, 270: 389–396. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.09.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ma M, Wu Y, Zhou J, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gu N: Size dependence of specific power absorption of Fe3O4particles in AC magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 2004, 268: 33–39. 10.1016/S0304-8853(03)00426-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayashi K, Moriya M, Sakamoto W, Yogo T: Chemoselective synthesis of folic acid-functionalized magnetite nanoparticles via click chemistry for magnetic hyperthermia. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 1318–1325. 10.1021/cm803113eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Rashad MM, El-Sayed HM, Rasly M, Nasr MI: Induction heating studies of magnetite nanospheres synthesized at room temperature for magnetic hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater 2012, 324: 4019–4023. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Ma et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.