Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Experimental evidence for direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in multi-layer graphene

  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 2Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2, 4,
  • 2,
  • 5 and
  • 1, 5Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:214

  • Received: 5 April 2013
  • Accepted: 24 April 2013
  • Published:


We have performed magnetotransport measurements on a multi-layer graphene flake. At the crossing magnetic field Bc, an approximately temperature-independent point in the measured longitudinal resistivity ρ xx , which is ascribed to the direct insulator-quantum Hall (I-QH) transition, is observed. By analyzing the amplitudes of the magnetoresistivity oscillations, we are able to measure the quantum mobility μq of our device. It is found that at the direct I-QH transition, μqBc ≈ 0.37 which is considerably smaller than 1. In contrast, at Bc, ρ xx is close to the Hall resistivity ρ xy , i.e., the classical mobility μBc is  1. Therefore, our results suggest that different mobilities need to be introduced for the direct I-QH transition observed in multi-layered graphene. Combined with existing experimental results obtained in various material systems, our data obtained on graphene suggest that the direct I-QH transition is a universal effect in 2D.


  • Insulator-quantum Hall transition
  • Graphene flake
  • Multi-layer graphene


Graphene, which is an ideal two-dimensional system [1], has attracted a great deal of worldwide interest. Interesting effects such as Berry's phase [2, 3] and fractional quantum Hall effect [46] have been observed in mechanically exfoliated graphene flakes [1]. In addition to its extraordinary electrical properties, graphene possesses great mechanical [7], optical [8], and thermal [9] characteristics.

The insulator-quantum Hall (I-QH) transition [1013] is a fascinating physical phenomenon in the field of two-dimensional (2D) physics. In particular, a direct transition from an insulator to a high Landau-level filling factor ν > 2 QH state which is normally dubbed as the direct I-QH transition continues to attract interest [14]. The direct I-QH transition has been observed in various systems such as SiGe hole gas [14], GaAs multiple quantum well devices [15], GaAs two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) containing InAs quantum dots [1618], a delta-doped GaAs quantum well with additional modulation doping [19, 20], GaN-based 2DEGs grown on sapphire [21] and on Si [22], InAs-based 2DEGs [23], and even some conventional GaAs-based 2DEGs [24], suggesting that it is a universal effect. Although some quantum phase transitions, such as plateau-plateau transitions [25] and metal-to-insulator transitions [2629], have been observed in single-layer graphene and insulating behavior has been observed in disordered graphene such as hydrogenated graphene [3033], graphene exposed to ozone [34], reduced graphene oxide [35], and fluorinated graphene [36, 37], the direct I-QH transition has not been observed in a graphene-based system. It is worth mentioning that the Anderson localization effect, an important signature of strong localization which may be affected by a magnetic field applied perpendicular to the graphene plane, was observed in a double-layer graphene heterostructure [38], but not in single-layer pristine graphene. Moreover, the disorder of single graphene is normally lower than those of multi-layer graphene devices. Since one needs sufficient disorder in order to see the I-QH transition [11], multi-layer graphene seems to be a suitable choice for studying such a transition in a pristine graphene-based system. Besides, the top and bottom layers may isolate the environmental impurities [3942], making multi-layer graphene a stable and suitable system for observing the I-QH transition.

In this paper, we report magnetotransport measurements on a multi-layer graphene flake. We observe an approximately temperature-independent point in the measured longitudinal resistivity ρ xx which can be ascribed to experimental evidence for the direct I-QH transition. At the crossing field Bc in which ρ xx is approximately T-independent, ρ xx is close to ρ xy . In contrast, the product of the quantum mobility determined from the oscillations in ρ xx and Bc is  0.37 which is considerably smaller than 1. Thus, our experimental results suggest that different mobilities need to be introduced when considering the direct I-QH transition in graphene-based devices.


A multi-layer graphene flake, mechanically exfoliated from natural graphite, was deposited onto a 300-nm-thick SiO2/Si substrate. Optical microscopy was used to locate the graphene flakes, and the thickness of multi-layer graphene is 3.5 nm, checked by atomic force microscopy. Therefore, the layer number of our graphene device is around ten according to the 3.4 Å graphene inter-layer distance [1, 43]. Ti/Au contacts were deposited on the multi-layer graphene flake by electron-beam lithography and lift-off process. The multi-layer graphene flake was made into a Hall bar pattern with a length-to-width ratio of 2.5 by oxygen plasma etching process [44]. Similar to the work done using disordered graphene, our graphene flakes did not undergo a post-exfoliation annealing treatment [45, 46]. The magnetoresistivity of the graphene device was measured using standard AC lock-in technique at 19 Hz with a constant current I = 20 nA in a He3 cryostat equipped with a superconducting magnet.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the curves of longitudinal and Hall resistivity ρ xx (B) and ρ xy (B) at T = 0.28 K. Features of magnetoresistivity oscillations accompanied by quantum Hall steps are observed at high fields. In order to further study these results, we analyze the positions of the extrema of the magnetoresistivity oscillations in B as well as the heights of the QH steps. Although the steps in the converted Hall conductivity ρ xy are not well quantized in units of 4e2/h, they allow us to determine the Landau-level filling factor as indicated in the inset of Figure 1. The carrier density of our device is calculated to be 9.4 × 1016 m−2 following the procedure described in [47, 48].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Longitudinal and Hall resistivity ρ xx ( B ) and ρ xy ( B ) at T = 0.28 K. The inset shows the converted ρ xy (in units of 4e2/h ) and ρ xx as a function of B.

We now turn to our main experimental finding. Figure 2 shows the curves of ρ xx (B) and ρ xy (B) as a function of magnetic field at various temperatures T. An approximately T-independent point in the measured ρ xx at Bc = 3.1 T is observed. In the vicinity of Bc, for B < Bc, the sample behaves as a weak insulator in the sense that ρ xx decreases with increasing T. For B > Bc, ρ xx increases with increasing T, characteristic of a quantum Hall state. At Bc, the corresponding Landau-level filling factor is about 125 which is much bigger than 1. Therefore, we have observed evidence for a direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in our multi-layer graphene. The crossing points for B > 5.43 T can be ascribed to approximately T-independent points near half filling factors in the conventional Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) model [17].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Longitudinal and Hall resistivity ρ xx ( B ) and ρ xy ( B ) at various temperatures T . An approximately T-independent point in ρ xx is indicated by a crossing field Bc.

By analyzing the amplitudes of the observed SdH oscillations at various magnetic fields and temperatures, we are able to determine the effective mass m * of our device which is an important physical quantity. The amplitudes of the SdH oscillations ρ xx is given by [49]:
Δ ρ xx B ; T = 4 ρ 0 exp π μ q B D B , T
where D B , T = 4 π 3 k B m * T heB / sinh 4 π 3 k B m * T heB , ρ0, kB, h, and e are a constant, the Boltzmann constant, Plank's constant, and electron charge, respectively. When 4 π 3 k B m * T heB > 1 , we have
ln Δ ρ xx B , T T = C 1 4 π 3 k B m * T heB
where C1 is a constant. Figure 3 shows the amplitudes of the SdH oscillations at a fixed magnetic field of 5.437 T. We can see that the experimental data can be well fitted to Equation 2. The measured effective mass ranges from 0.06m0 to 0.07m0 where m0 is the rest mass of an electron. Interestingly, the measured effective mass is quite close to that in GaAs (0.067m0).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Amplitudes of the observed oscillations Δ ρ xx at B = 5.437 T at different temperatures. The curve corresponds to the best fit to Equation 2.

In our system, for the direct I-QH transition near the crossing field, ρ xx is close to ρ xy . In this case, the classical Drude mobility is approximately the inverse of the crossing field 1/Bc. Therefore, the onset of Landau quantization is expected to take place near Bc[50]. However, it is noted that Landau quantization should be linked with the quantum mobility, not the classical Drude mobility [19]. In order to further study the observed I-QH transition, we analyze the amplitudes of the magnetoresistivity oscillations versus the inverse of B at various temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, there is a good linear fit to Equation 1 which allows us to estimate the quantum mobility to be around 0.12 m2/V/s. Therefore, near μqBc 0.37 which is considerably smaller than 1. Our results obtained on multi-layered graphene are consistent with those obtained in GaAs-based weakly disordered systems [19, 21].
Figure 4
Figure 4

ln [ Δ ρ xx ρ 0 D B , T ] as a function of the inverse of the magnetic field 1/ B . The solid line corresponds to the best fit to Equation 1.

It has been shown that the elementary neutral excitations in graphene in a high magnetic field are different from those of a standard 2D system [51]. In this case, the particular Landau-level quantization in graphene yields linear magnetoplasmon modes. Moreover, instability of magnetoplasmons can be observed in layered graphene structures [52]. Therefore, in order to fully understand the observed I-QH transition in our multi-layer graphene sample, magnetoplasmon modes as well as collective phenomena may need to be considered. The spin effect should not be important in our system [53]. At present, it is unclear whether intra- and/or inter-graphene layer interactions play an important role in our system. Nevertheless, the fact that the low-field Hall resistivity is nominally T-independent suggests that Coulomb interactions do not seem to be dominant in our system.


In conclusion, we have presented magnetoresistivity measurements on a multi-layered graphene flake. An approximately temperature-independent point in ρ xx is ascribed to the direct I-QH transition. Near the crossing field Bc, ρ xx is close to ρ xy , indicating that at Bc, the classical mobility is close to 1/Bc such that Bc is close to 1. On the other hand, μqBc 0.37 which is much smaller than 1. Therefore, different mobilities must be considered for the direct I-QH transition. Together with existing experimental results obtained on various material systems, our new results obtained in a graphene-based system strongly suggest that the direct I-QH transition is a universal effect in 2D.





Two-dimensional electron gases


Insulator-quantum Hall


Shubnikov-de Haas.



This work was funded by the National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan (grant no: NSC 99-2911-I-002-126 and NSC 101-2811-M-002-096). CC gratefully acknowledges the financial support from Interchange Association, Japan (IAJ) and the NSC, Taiwan for providing a Japan/Taiwan Summer Program student grant.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Graduate School of Advanced Integration Science, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
Department of Electrophysics, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, 600, Taiwan
Department of Electrical Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14206-1500, USA
Graduate Institute of Applied Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan


  1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306: 666. 10.1126/science.1102896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Y, Tan Y-W, Stormer HL, Kim P: Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 201. 10.1038/nature04235View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA: Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 197. 10.1038/nature04233View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolotin KI, Ghahari F, Shulman MD, Stormer HL, Kim P: Observation of the fractional quantum Hall effect in graphene. Nature 2009, 462: 196. 10.1038/nature08582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Du X, Skachko I, Duerr F, Luican A, Andrei EY: Fractional quantum Hall effect and insulating phase of Dirac electrons in graphene. Nature 2009, 462: 192. 10.1038/nature08522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman BE, Krauss B, Smet JH, Yacoby A: Unconventional sequence of fractional quantum Hall states in suspended graphene. Science 2012, 337: 1196. 10.1126/science.1224784View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321: 385. 10.1126/science.1157996View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nair PR, Blake P, Grigorenko AN, Novoselov KS, Booth TJ, Stauber T, Peres NMR, Geim AK: Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008, 320: 1308. 10.1126/science.1156965View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN: Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 902. 10.1021/nl0731872View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kivelson S, Lee DH, Zhang SC: Global phase diagram in the quantum Hall effect. Phys Rev B 1992, 46: 2223. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.2223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang HW, Johnson CE, Wang KL, Hannahs ST: Observation of magnetic-field-induced delocalization: transition from Anderson insulator to quantum Hall conductor. Phys Rev Lett 1993, 71: 1439. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang T, Clark KP, Spencer GF, Mack AM, Kirk WP: Magnetic-field-induced metal-insulator transition in two dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72: 709. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.709View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes RJF, Nicholls JT, Frost JEF, Linfield EH, Pepper M, Ford CJB, Ritchie DA, Jones GAC, Kogan E, Kaveh M: Magnetic-field-induced insulator-quantum Hall-insulator transition in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas. J Phys Condens Matter 1994, 6: 4763. 10.1088/0953-8984/6/25/014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Song S-H, Shahar D, Tsui DC, Xie YH, Monroe D: New universality at the magnetic field driven insulator to integer quantum Hall effect transitions. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78: 2200. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee CH, Chang YH, Suen YW, Lin HH: Magnetic-field-induced delocalization in center-doped GaAs/Al x Ga1-xAs multiple quantum wells. Phys Rev B 1998, 58: 10629. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.10629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang T-Y, Juang JR, Huang CF, Kim G-H, Huang C-P, Liang C-T, Chang YH, Chen YF, Lee Y, Ritchie DA: On the low-field insulator-quantum Hall conductor transitions. Physica E 2004, 22: 240. 10.1016/j.physe.2003.11.258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang T-Y, Liang C-T, Kim G-H, Huang CF, Huang C-P, Lin J-Y, Goan H-S, Ritchie DA: From insulator to quantum Hall liquid at low magnetic fields. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 113305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang C-T, Lin L-H, Chen KY, Lo S-T, Wang Y-T, Lou D-S, Kim G-H, Chang Y-H, Ochiai Y, Aoki N, Chen J-C, Lin Y, Huang C-F, Lin S-D, Ritchie DA: On the direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in two-dimensional electron systems in the vicinity of nanoscaled scatterers. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 131. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen KY, Chang YH, Liang C-T, Aoki N, Ochiai Y, Huang CF, Lin L-H, Cheng KA, Cheng HH, Lin HH, Wu J-Y, Lin S-D: Probing Landau quantization with the presence of insulator–quantum Hall transition in a GaAs two-dimensional electron system. J Phys Condens Matter 2008, 20: 295223. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/29/295223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lo S-T, Chen KY, Lin TL, Lin L-H, Luo D-S, Ochiai Y, Aoki N, Wang Y-T, Peng ZF, Lin Y, Chen JC, Lin S-D, Huang CF, Liang C-T: Probing the onset of strong localization and electron–electron interactions with the presence of a direct insulator–quantum Hall transition. Solid State Commun 2010, 150: 1902. 10.1016/j.ssc.2010.07.040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin J-Y, Chen J-H, Kim G-H, Park H, Youn DH, Jeon CM, Baik JM, Lee J-L, Liang C-T, Chen YF: Magnetotransport measurements on an AlGaN/GaN two-dimensional electron system. J Korea Phys Soc 2006, 49: 1130.Google Scholar
  22. Kannan ES, Kim GH, Lin JY, Chen JH, Chen KY, Zhang ZY, Liang CT, Lin LH, Youn DH, Kang KY, Chen NC: Experimental evidence for weak insulator-quantum Hall transitions in GaN/AlGaN two-dimensional electron systems. J Korean Phys Soc 2007, 50: 1643. 10.3938/jkps.50.1643View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao KH, Yu G, Zhou YM, Wei LM, Lin T, Shang LY, Sun L, Yang R, Zhou WZ, Dai N, Chu JH, Austing DG, Gu Y, Zhang YG: Insulator-quantum Hall conductor transition in high electron density gated InGaAs/InAlAs quantum wells. J Appl Phys 2010, 108: 063701. 10.1063/1.3486081View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lo S-T, Wang Y-T, Bohra G, Comfort E, Lin T-Y, Kang M-G, Strasser G, Bird JP, Huang CF, Lin L-H, Chen JC, Liang C-T: Insulator, semiclassical oscillations and quantum Hall liquids at low magnetic fields. J Phys Condens Matter 2012, 24: 405601. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/40/405601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Giesbers AJM, Zeitler U, Ponomarenko LA, Yang R, Novoselov KS: Scaling of the quantum Hall plateau-plateau transition in graphene. Phys Rev B 2009, 80: 241411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Amado M, Diez E, Rossela F, Bellani V, López-Romero D, Maude DK: Magneto-transport of graphene and quantum phase transitions in the quantum Hall regime. J Phys Condens Matter 2012, 24: 305302. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/30/305302View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Amado M, Diez E, López-Romero D, Rossella F, Caridad JM, Dionigi F, Bellani V, Maude DK: Plateau–insulator transition in graphene. New J Phys 2010, 12: 053004. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu W, Yuan HY, Shi QW, Hou JG, Wang XR: Topological transition of graphene from a quantum Hall metal to a quantum Hall insulator at ν = 0. New J Phys 2011, 13: 113008. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Checkelsky JG, Li L, Ong NP: Zero-energy state in graphene in a high magnetic field. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 100: 206801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Elias DC, Nair RR, Mohiuddin TMG, Morozov SV, Blake P, Halsall MP, Ferrari AC, Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI, Geim AK, Novoselov KS: Control of graphene's properties by reversible hydrogenation: evidence for graphane. Science 2009, 323: 610. 10.1126/science.1167130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chuang C, Puddy RK, Lin H-D, Lo S-T, Chen T-M, Smith CG, Linag C-T: Experimental evidence for Efros-Shklovskii variable range hopping in hydrogenated graphene. Solid State Commun 2012, 152: 905. 10.1016/j.ssc.2012.02.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chuang C, Puddy RK, Connolly MR, Lo S-T, Lin H-D, Chen T-M, Smith CG, Liang C-T: Evidence for formation of multi-quantum dots in hydrogenated graphene. Nano Res 2012, 7: 459. Lett LettView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lo S-T, Chuang C, Puddy RK, Chen T-M, Smith CG, Liang C-T: Non-ohmic behavior of carrier transport in highly disordered graphene. Nanotechnology 2013, 24: 165201. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/16/165201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Moser J, Tao H, Roche S, Alzina F, Torres CMS, Bachtold A: Magnetotransport in disordered graphene exposed to ozone: from weak to strong localization. Phys Rev B 2010, 81: 205445.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang S-W, Lin HE, Lin H-D, Chen KY, Tu K-H, Chen CW, Chen J-Y, Liu C-H, Liang C-T, Chen YF: Transport behavior and negative magnetoresistance in chemically reduced graphene oxide nanofilms. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 335701. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/33/335701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hong X, Cheng S-H, Herding C, Zhu J: Colossal negative magnetoresistance in dilute fluorinated graphene. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 085410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Withers F, Russo S, Dubois M, Craciun MF: Tuning the electronic transport properties of graphene through functionalisation with fluorine. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 526. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ponomarenko LA, Geim AK, Zhukov AA, Jalil R, Morozov SV, Novoselov KS, Grigorieva IV, Hill EH, Cheianov VV, Falko VI, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Gorbachev RV: Tunable metal–insulator transition in double-layer graphene heterostructures. Nat Phys 2011, 7: 958. 10.1038/nphys2114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hass J, de Heer WA, Conrad EH: The growth and morphology of epitaxial multilayer graphene. J Phys Condens Matter 2008, 20: 323202. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/32/323202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sui Y, Appenzeller J: Screening and interlayer coupling in multilayer graphene field-effect transistors. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 2973. 10.1021/nl901396gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim K, Park HJ, Woo B-C, Kim KJ, Kim GT, Yun WS: Electric property evolution of structurally defected multilayer graphene. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3092. 10.1021/nl8010337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Hass J, Varchon F, Millán-Otoya JE, Sprinkle M, Sharma N, de Heer WA, Berger C, First PN, Magaud L, Conrad EH: Why multilayer graphene on 4 H -SiC(0001) behaves like a single sheet of graphene. Phy Rev Lett 2008, 100: 125504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G: Intercalation compounds of graphite. Adv Phys 2002, 51: 1. 10.1080/00018730110113644View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ponomarenko LA, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI, Yang R, Hill EW, Novoselov KS, Geim AK: Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science 2008, 320: 356. 10.1126/science.1154663View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bohra G, Somphonsane R, Aoki N, Ochiai Y, Ferry DK, Bird JP: Robust mesoscopic fluctuations in disordered graphene. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 093110. 10.1063/1.4748167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bohra G, Somphonsane R, Aoki N, Ochiai Y, Akis R, Ferry DK, Bird JP: Nonergodicity and microscopic symmetry breaking of the conductance fluctuations in disordered mesoscopic graphene. Phys Rev B 2012, 86: 161405(R).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharapov SG, Gusynin VP, Beck H: Magnetic oscillations in planar systems with the Dirac-like spectrum of quasiparticle excitations. Phys Rev B 2004, 69: 075104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud C, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov AN, Conrad EH, First PN, de Heer WA: Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science 2006, 312: 1191. 10.1126/science.1125925View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Coleridge PT, Stoner R, Fletcher R: Low-field transport coefficients in GaAs/Ga1-x AlxAs heterostructures. Phys Rev B 1989, 39: 1120. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Huckestein B: Quantum Hall effect at low magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 2000, 84: 3141. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Roldán R, Fuchs J-N, Goerbig MO: Collective modes of doped graphene and a standard two-dimensional electron gas in a strong magnetic field: linear magnetoplasmons versus magnetoexcitons. Phys Rev B 2009, 80: 085408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Berman OL, Gumbs G, Lozovik YE: Magnetoplasmons in layered graphene structures. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 085401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Cho KS, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Tang YQ, Shen B: Spin-dependent photocurrent induced by Rashba-type spin splitting in Al0.25Ga0.75N/GaN heterostructures. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 085327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Chuang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.