Skip to main content

Reduced graphene oxide aerogel with high-rate supercapacitive performance in aqueous electrolytes


Reduced graphene oxide aerogel (RGOA) is synthesized successfully through a simultaneous self-assembly and reduction process using hypophosphorous acid and I2 as reductant. Nitrogen sorption analysis shows that the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of RGOA could reach as high as 830 m2 g−1, which is the largest value ever reported for graphene-based aerogels obtained through the simultaneous self-assembly and reduction strategy. The as-prepared RGOA is characterized by a variety of means such as scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Electrochemical tests show that RGOA exhibits a high-rate supercapacitive performance in aqueous electrolytes. The specific capacitance of RGOA is calculated to be 211.8 and 278.6 F g−1 in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively. The perfect supercapacitive performance of RGOA is ascribed to its three-dimensional structure and the existence of oxygen-containing groups.


As a novel energy storage device that bridges the gap between conventional capacitors and batteries, supercapacitor has attracted much attention for its high power density and long cyclic life [1]. The studies about supercapacitor mainly focus on the electrode materials such as transition metal oxides, conducting polymers, and particularly carbon materials that are perfect electrode materials because of their good conductivity, cyclic stability, and large specific surface area [24]. Carbon materials with different structures such as carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, hierarchical porous carbons, and ordered mesoporous carbons are widely studied in recent years [58]. Apart from these carbon materials, graphene and graphene-based materials have also been widely studied as electrode materials of supercapacitor [913]. Graphene is a two-dimensional sheet of sp2-hybridized carbon, which possesses many remarkable properties such as high surface area, excellent mechanical strength, and low electrical resistivity [14, 15]. However, the practical preparation (chemical reduction process) of graphene-based material is often accompanied by the sacrifice of graphene surface area because the graphene layers are easy to restack through a π-π interaction during the chemical reduction process.

In order to obtain graphene-based material with high specific surface area, many researchers have prepared graphene-based materials with three-dimensional architecture. As a typical three-dimensional graphene-based material that has attracted much attention of researchers, graphene aerogel is often synthesized mainly through two strategies currently: self-assembly during reduction process [1620] and post-reduction process after self-assembly [2124]. Employing the first method, Xu et al. prepared graphene aerogel via self-assembly of graphene oxide during a hydrothermal reduction process at 180°C [16]. Chen synthesized graphene aerogel using various reductants such as NaHSO3, Na2S, vitamin C, and HI [17]. The specific surface area of the as-prepared graphene aerogels could only reach up to 512 m2 g−1[20] because the reduction of graphene oxide was accompanied by the elimination of oxygen-containing groups in aqueous solution. This could lead to the hydrophobility increase of reduced graphene oxide, thus resulting in the restacking of graphene sheets. Adopting the second method, we prepared the graphene aerogel with a superhigh C/O molar ratio by hydrogen reduction [21]. Worsley et al. synthesized a graphene aerogel through the self-assembly process in a basic solution followed by thermal reduction under nitrogen atmosphere. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of the as-prepared graphene aerogel could reach as high as 1,300 m2 g−1, which is the largest value ever reported in the literatures [22]. Although the graphene aerogels possess large BET surface area when employing the second strategy, the preparation procedure is complex due to the separated self-assembly and reduction processes. It usually takes 72 h to finish the separate self-assembly process [23]. How to produce graphene aerogel with high surface area in a simple way is still a challenge currently.

Apart from the high surface area, the surface properties should also be taken into consideration while graphene-based material is used as electrode material in supercapacitor. The existence of surface functional groups is the characteristic surface properties of graphene-based materials made by Hummers' method. Graphene materials with functional surface often have a better dispersibility in aqueous electrolyte. Moreover, these functional groups may also generate pseudocapacitance in aqueous electrolytes. Xu's study indicates that graphene oxide is more suitable for supercapacitor application than graphene due to the existence of pseudocapacitance generated from the oxygen-containing groups [25]. Our previous work also shows that graphene oxide aerogel possesses a higher specific capacitance than graphene aerogel at low current densities in KOH electrolyte [21]. Thus, it would be promising to prepare high surface area graphene-based aerogels with functional surface for supercapacitor applications.

Herein, we synthesize a partially reduced graphene oxide aerogel (RGOA) through a simultaneous self-assembly and reduction process using hypophosphorous acid (HPA) and I2 as the reductants. Nitrogen sorption analysis shows that the specific surface area of the as-prepared RGOA could reach as high as 830 m2 g−1, which is the largest specific surface area ever reported for graphene aerogels obtained through the simultaneous self-assembly and reduction strategy. Electrochemical tests show that RGOA exhibits a high-rate supercapacitive performance in aqueous electrolytes. The specific capacitance of the RGOA can reach 211.8 and 278.6 F g−1 in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively.


Material preparation

Graphite powder was purchased from Qingdao Ruisheng Graphite Co., Ltd. (Shandong, China). All other chemicals were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Company (Shanghai, China) and used directly without further purification. Graphite oxide was prepared according to Hummers' method [26]. Graphene oxide solution (5 mg mL−1) was acquired by dispersing graphite oxide in deionized water under ultrasonication. The reduced graphene oxide hydrogel was prepared according to Phams' method [18]. In a typical experiment, 5 g I2 was dissolved in 100 g HPA solution (50 wt.%), and then a 100-mL graphene oxide solution was added and sonicated for 5 min before transferred into an oven and aged at 90°C for 12 h. The obtained product was washed twice with acetone in a Soxhlet extractor (ISOPAD, Heidelberg, Germany) for 12 h to get reduced graphene oxide gels. The wet gels were dried with supercritical CO2 to obtain reduced graphene oxide aerogel, which was labeled as RGOA.

Material characterization

The microstructure of the samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker Optik Gmbh, Ettlingen, Germany) and Raman spectroscopy (RM2000, Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK). The thickness of graphite oxide sheet was examined using an atomic force microscope (AFM, Multimode NS3A, Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY, USA). The microscopic morphology of the samples was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL2010, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The surface properties of the samples were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab 250, Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Nicolet 5700, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Nitrogen sorption measurement was performed with an ASAP 2020M analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) to obtain the specific surface area and pore structure parameters of the sample.

Electrochemical measurements

Working electrodes were made by pressing RGOA onto the nickel foam and titanium mesh for 6 M KOH and 1 M H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively. The mass of active materials in each electrode was about 2 mg. In order to ensure that the electrode materials were thoroughly wetted with the electrolyte, the working electrodes were vacuum-impregnated with the electrolytes before electrochemical tests. The electrochemical capacitive performances of the sample were studied on a CHI660D electrochemical workstation. Electrochemical measurements including cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge–discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were performed in a three-electrode system using a platinum film as a counter electrode and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode. Potential windows of −1 ~ 0 V and 0 ~ 1 V vs. SCE reference electrode were applied to the electrochemical measurements in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively. In addition, the electrochemical performance of RGOA was also evaluated using a two-electrode system in H2SO4 electrolyte with a potential window of 0 ~ 1.2 V.

Results and discussion

Morphological evolution

AFM image of graphite oxide (GO) (Figure 1a) shows that the size of prepared GO sheets is in a range of several hundred nanometers to 1 μm, and the AFM height profile of GO sheets reveals that the obtained GO sheets are monolayered (approximately 1 nm). SEM image (Figure 1b) indicates that RGOA is composed of randomly oriented GO/graphene sheets, forming a three-dimensional structure. Plentiful mesopores and macropores are found in the bulk of RGOA, suggesting the formation of a porous material. TEM image reveals that RGOA presents an ordered graphitic structure with curved graphene sheets. The formation of graphitic structure indicates a high reduction degree of graphene oxide during the preparation process.

Figure 1

Microstructural observations for samples. (a) AFM image of graphite oxide sheets with height profile. (b) SEM and (c) TEM images of RGOA.

Structural evolution

Type IV adsorption isotherm is observed for RGOA (Figure 2a), indicating that the aerogel is a mesoporous material. The obvious hysteresis loop can be observed at relative pressures ranging from 0.42 to 1.0. The pore size distribution curve (Figure 2b) derived from desorption branch by the Barret-Joyner-Halenda method shows that most of the pores distribute within a range of 2 to 50 nm with a most probable pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The BET specific surface area is calculated to be 830 m2 g−1, which is the largest value ever reported for graphene-based aerogel materials prepared by a simultaneous self-assembly and reduction method. The interlayer distance of GO calculated from the (002) peak in XRD pattern (Figure 2C) is 0.71 nm, which is much larger than that of pristine graphite (approximately 0.34 nm) owing to the fact that plenty of oxygen-containing groups, such as hydroxyl, epoxyl, and carboxyl, are introduced onto graphene layers during the oxidation process. Compared with GO, the XRD pattern of RGOA exhibits a broad diffraction peak at 2θ = 24° corresponding to the (002) plane of graphite structure. The formation of graphite-like structure of RGOA indicates the efficient removal of oxygen-containing groups from GO during the simultaneous self-assembly and reduction process. For the purpose of exploring the structural and electronic properties, including disordered and defect structures, of RGOA, Raman spectroscopy analyses are also conducted (Figure 2d). There are two prominent peaks at approximately 1,355 and approximately 1,600 cm−1 corresponding to the D and G band, respectively. It has been reported that the D band originates from the disorder-induced mode associated with structural defects and imperfections, while the G band corresponds to the first-order scattering of the E2g mode from the sp2 carbon domains [27]. The intensity ratio ID/IG is often used as a measure of the disorder in graphitic materials [28]. The increased ID/IG value indicates the restoration of sp2 C=C bonds in graphitic structure when oxygen-containing groups escape from GO. Moreover, the decrease of full-width at half maximum of G band indicates a high graphitization degree of RGOA as well [29, 30]. These results coincide well with what was reflected from XRD analyses and TEM observations.

Figure 2

Structural analyses for samples. (a) N2 sorption isotherm and (b) pore size distribution curve of RGOA. (c) XRD patterns and (d) Raman spectra of GO and RGOA.

Evolution of surface properties

XPS analyses are conducted for GO and RGOA (Figure 3a) to investigate the changes of surface oxygen-containing species during the preparation process. The C1s spectrum of GO can be deconvoluted into four peaks at 284.6, 286.7, 287.8, and 289 eV, corresponding to C=C/C-C in aromatic rings, C-O in alkoxyl and epoxyl, C=O in carbonyl, and O-C=O in carboxyl groups, respectively [3033]. When GO is reduced, the peak intensity of C=C/C-C in aromatic rings rises dramatically, while those of C-O and C=O decrease sharply, and the peak of O-C=O disappears, clearly suggesting the efficient removal of oxygen-containing groups and the restoration of C=C/C-C structure in graphitic structure. It should also be noted that a new peak emerges at 291 eV corresponding to the π-π* shake-up satellite peak, indicating that the delocalized π conjugation is restored [34, 35]. C/O molar ratios calculated according to the XPS analyses are 2.3 and 6.1 for GO and RGOA, respectively. FT-IR is also adopted to analyze the evolution of oxygen-containing groups during the self-assembly and reduction process (Figure 3b). As for GO, the following characteristic peaks are observed: O-H stretching vibrations (3,000 ~ 3,500 cm−1), C=O stretching vibrations from carbonyl and carboxyl groups (approximately 1,720 cm−1), C=C stretching or skeletal vibrations from unoxidized graphitic domains (approximately 1,620 cm−1), O-H bending vibrations from hydroxyl groups (approximately 1,400 cm−1), C-O stretching vibration from epoxyl (approximately 1,226 cm−1), and alkoxyl (approximately 1,052 cm−1) [27, 36]. There is a dramatic decrease of hydroxyl, C-O and C=O groups after the reduction process. A new featured peak at 1,568 cm−1 due to the skeletal vibration of graphene sheets appears. Combining the results of XPS and FT-IR analyses, partial oxygen-containing groups are still retained after the self-assembly and reduction process although there is a significant decrease of such functional groups.

Figure 3

C1 s XPS spectra (a) and FT-IR spectra (b) of GO and RGOA.

Electrochemical capacitive performances

Three-electrode system

Cyclic voltammograms of RGOA at different scan rates in KOH and H2SO4 are shown in Figure 4a. The CV curves in both electrolytes show a rectangular-like shape, which is attributed to the electric double-layer capacitance in each potential window. As for the CV curves in KOH electrolyte, although there is no obvious redox peaks, RGOA also exhibits pseudocapacitance besides electric double-layer capacitance at the potential window of −1.0 ~ −0.3 V because the current density severely changes as the potential varies within this potential window [21]. An equilibrium redox reaction probably occurs as follows within this potential window [37]:

C X O + e + K + C X OK .

contrast, there are obvious redox peaks within the potential window of 0.0 ~ 0.6 V in H2SO4 electrolyte, which are thought to be derived from the following redox reactions [38, 39]:

> C OH C = O + H + + e ,
Figure 4

Electrochemical performance of RGOA in KOH and H 2 SO 4 electrolytes. (a) Cyclic voltammograms at the voltage scan rates of 10, 20, and 50 mV s−1. (b) Plots of specific capacitance and its retention ratio vs. voltage scan rate. (c) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves at a current density of 2 A g−1. (d) Plots of specific capacitance and its retention ratio vs. current density.

In addition, the current density at each scan rate in H2SO4 electrolyte is higher than that in KOH electrolyte, which indicates that oxygen-containing groups exhibit more pseudocapacitance in acid electrolyte. Therefore, as shown in Figure 4b, the specific capacitance calculated from CV curves displays that RGOA possesses larger capacitance in H2SO4 electrolyte when the scan rates are lower than 100 mV s−1. However, RGOA maintains a higher capacitance in KOH electrolyte when the scan rates exceed 100 mV s−1, which is probably due to the higher ionic concentration of KOH electrolyte than that of H2SO4 electrolyte. The galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of RGOA in different electrolytes are composed of two parts: the first part is within the potential window of 0.0 ~ −0.3 V in KOH electrolyte and 0.6 ~ 1.0 V in H2SO4 electrolyte, which is attributed to the electric double-layer capacitance. The other part exhibits a longer duration time, indicating the existence of pseudocapacitance besides the electric double-layer capacitance. As shown in Figure 4d, capacitance retention ratios of RGOA remain 74% and 63% in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes when current density increases from 0.2 to 20 A g−1, exhibiting a high-rate capacitive performance. This high-rate performance is mainly attributed to the three-dimensional structure, which is beneficial for the ionic diffusion of electrolyte to the inner pores of bulk material. As shown in Figure 4d, the specific capacitances are calculated to be 211.8 and 278.6 F g−1 in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes at the current density of 0.2 A g−1. The specific capacitances per surface area are calculated to be 25.5 and 33.6 μF cm−2 in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively, indicating more pseudocapacitance in H2SO4 electrolyte. These results coincide well with the cyclic voltammetry measurements.

EIS is adopted to investigate the chemical and physical processes occurring on the electrode surface. The Nyquist plots of RGOA in different electrolytes are shown in Figure 5a. Within the low-frequency region, the curve in KOH electrolyte is more parallel to the ordinate than that in H2SO4 electrolyte, indicating a better capacitive behavior in KOH electrolyte. The intersection of the curve with the abscissa represents equivalent series resistance [40]. This value is due to the combination of the following: (a) ionic and electronic charge-transfer resistances, (b) intrinsic charge-transfer resistance of the active material, and (c) diffusive as well as contact resistance at the active material/current collector interface [41]. It can be seen from the inset in Figure 5a that these resistance values are 0.30 and 0.40 Ω for KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively. This is mainly attributed to the different ionic concentration of electrolytes. The semicircular loop at high frequencies is due to the charge transfer resistance of the electrode, which is attributed to the faradaic redox process in the system. The charge-transfer resistances Rct can be estimated from the diameter of this semicircle to be 1.03 and 1.16 Ω in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively, which indicates a more pseudocapacitance in H2SO4. This result coincides well with the results from cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge–discharge measurements. Figure 5b shows the cycle stability of RGOA through cyclic voltammetry measurements. The capacitance retention ratio reaches 98.5% after 1,000 cycles in H2SO4, which is larger than that in KOH electrolyte.

Figure 5

Nyquist plot (a) and cycle tests (b) in electrolytes of KOH and H 2 SO 4 .

Two-electrode system

Considering the high specific capacitance and perfect cycle stability in H2SO4 electrolyte, RGOA electrodes are assembled into a supercapacitor cell and tested in a two-electrode system with a potential window of 0.0 ~ 1.2 V. The energy density (E) and power density (P) are calculated using Equations 1 and 2 [42]:

E = 1 2 C cell V 2 ,
P = E Δt ,

where Ccell is the specific capacitance of the total cell, V is the cell potential, and Δt is the discharge time. As shown in Figure 6a, the cyclic voltammogramms of RGOA basically show a rectangular shape even at high scan rates although there are obvious redox peaks, which indicates a combination of electric double-layer and pseudocapacitive capacitance formation mechanism. The galvanostatic charge–discharge curve (the inset in Figure 6b) shows a fine symmetry, indicating a perfect coulombic efficiency for supercapacitor cell. The Ragone plot in Figure 5b displays that RGOA exhibits a high energy density even at a large power density, which is superior to other graphene-based materials [43].

Figure 6

Supercapacitive performance of RGOA in a two-electrode system. (a) Cyclic voltammogramms at different scan rates. (b) Ragone plot and galvanostatic charge–discharge curves at a current density of 5 A g−1 (inset).


A simultaneous self-assembly and reduction method is adopted to successfully synthesize the reduced graphene oxide aerogel with the specific surface area of 830 m2 g−1, which is the largest value ever reported for graphene-based aerogels obtained through the simultaneous self-assembly and reduction strategy. Systematic characterizations suggest that the as-prepared RGOA is a three-dimensional mesoporous material with functionalized surface. Electrochemical tests show that RGOA exhibits high-rate supercapacitive performance. Its specific capacitances reach as high as 211.8 and 278.6 F g−1 in KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes, respectively. The perfect supercapacitive performance of RGOA is ascribed to its three-dimensional structure and the existence of oxygen-containing groups.


  1. 1.

    Conway BE: Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. New York: Kluwer-Plenum; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Karandikar PB, Talange DB, Mhaskar UP, Bansal R: Development, modeling and characterization of aqueous metal oxide based supercapacitor. Energy 2012, 40: 131–138. 10.1016/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nishihara H, Kyotani T: Templated nanocarbons for energy storage. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 4473–4498. 10.1002/adma.201201715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Snook GA, Kao P, Best AS: Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 1–12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim C, Choi Y-O, Lee W-J, Yang K-S: Supercapacitor performances of activated carbon fiber webs prepared by electrospinning of PMDA-ODA poly(amic acid) solutions. Electrochim Acta 2004, 50: 883–887. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.02.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sivakkumar SR, Ko JM, Kim DY, Kim BC, Wallace GG: Performance evaluation of CNT/polypyrrole/MnO2 composite electrodes for electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim Acta 2007, 52: 7377–7385. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xing W, Huang CC, Zhuo SP, Yuan X, Wang GQ, Hulicova-Jurcakova D, Yan ZF, Lu GQ: Hierarchical porous carbons with high performance for supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon 2009, 47: 1715–1722. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Xing W, Qiao SZ, Ding RG, Li F, Lu GQ, Yan ZF, Cheng HM: Superior electric double layer capacitors using ordered mesoporous carbons. Carbon 2006, 44: 216–224. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bai Y, Rakhi RB, Chen W, Alshareef HN: Effect of pH-induced chemical modification of hydrothermally reduced graphene oxide on supercapacitor performance. J Power Sources 2013, 233: 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Li Y, van Zijll M, Chiang S, Pan N: KOH modified graphene nanosheets for supercapacitor electrodes. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 6003–6006. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu C, Yu Z, Neff D, Zhamu A, Jang BZ: Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 4863–4868. 10.1021/nl102661q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu Y, Zhang Y, Ma G, Wang Z, Liu K, Liu H: Ethylene glycol reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite for supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 2013, 88: 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun D, Yan X, Lang J, Xue Q: High performance supercapacitor electrode based on graphene paper via flame-induced reduction of graphene oxide paper. J Power Sources 2013, 222: 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN: Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 902–907. 10.1021/nl0731872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321: 385–388. 10.1126/science.1157996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xu Y, Sheng K, Li C, Shi G: Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one-step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 4324–4330. 10.1021/nn101187z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen W, Yan L: In situ self-assembly of mild chemical reduction graphene for three-dimensional architectures. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 3132–3137. 10.1039/c1nr10355e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pham HD, Pham VH, Cuong TV, Nguyen-Phan T-D, Chung JS, Shin EW, Kim S: Synthesis of the chemically converted graphene xerogel with superior electrical conductivity. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 9672–9674. 10.1039/c1cc13329b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang J, Shi Z, Fan J, Ge Y, Yin J, Hu G: Self-assembly of graphene into three-dimensional structures promoted by natural phenolic acids. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 22459–22466. 10.1039/c2jm35024f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang X, Sui Z, Xu B, Yue S, Luo Y, Zhan W, Liu B: Mechanically strong and highly conductive graphene aerogel and its use as electrodes for electrochemical power sources. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 6494–6497. 10.1039/c1jm10239g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wu X, Zhou J, Xing W, Wang G, Cui H, Zhuo S, Xue Q, Yan Z, Qiao SZ: High-rate capacitive performance of graphene aerogel with a superhigh C/O molar ratio. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 23186–23193. 10.1039/c2jm35278h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Worsley MA, Kucheyev SO, Mason HE, Merrill MD, Mayer BP, Lewicki J, Valdez CA, Suss ME, Stadermann M, Pauzauskie PJ, Satcher JH Jr, Biener J, Baumann TF: Mechanically robust 3D graphene macroassembly with high surface area. Chem Commun 2012, 48: 8428–8430. 10.1039/c2cc33979j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Worsley MA, Pauzauskie PJ, Olson TY, Biener J, Satcher JH, Baumann TF: Synthesis of graphene aerogel with high electrical conductivity. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 14067–14069. 10.1021/ja1072299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Worsley MA, Olson TY, Lee JRI, Willey TM, Nielsen MH, Roberts SK, Pauzauskie PJ, Biener J, Satcher JH, Baumann TF: High surface area, sp2-cross-linked three-dimensional graphene monoliths. J Phys Chem Lett 2011, 2: 921–925. 10.1021/jz200223x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xu B, Yue S, Sui Z, Zhang X, Hou S, Cao G, Yang Y: What is the choice for supercapacitors: graphene or graphene oxide? Energy & Environmental Science 2011, 4: 2826–2830. 10.1039/c1ee01198g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hummers WS, Offeman RE: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958, 80: 1339. 10.1021/ja01539a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Park S-H, Bak S-M, Kim K-H, Jegal J-P, Lee S-I, Lee J, Kim K-B: Solid-state microwave irradiation synthesis of high quality graphene nanosheets under hydrogen containing atmosphere. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 680–686. 10.1039/c0jm01007c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wu Z-S, Ren W, Gao L, Zhao J, Chen Z, Liu B, Tang D, Yu B, Jiang C, Cheng H-M: Synthesis of graphene sheets with high electrical conductivity and good thermal stability by hydrogen arc discharge exfoliation. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 411–417. 10.1021/nn900020u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ferrari AC, Robertson J: Raman spectroscopy of amorphous, nanostructured, diamond-like carbon, and nanodiamond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2004, 362: 2477–2512. 10.1098/rsta.2004.1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Su C-Y, Xu Y, Zhang W, Zhao J, Tang X, Tsai C-H, Li L-J: Electrical and spectroscopic characterizations of ultra-large reduced graphene oxide monolayers. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 5674–5680. 10.1021/cm902182y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gao J, Liu F, Liu Y, Ma N, Wang Z, Zhang X: Environment-friendly method to produce graphene that employs vitamin C and amino acid. Chem Mater 2010, 22: 2213–2218. 10.1021/cm902635j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shin H-J, Kim KK, Benayad A, Yoon S-M, Park HK, Jung I-S, Jin MH, Jeong H-K, Kim JM, Choi J-Y, Lee YH: Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19: 1987–1992. 10.1002/adfm.200900167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007, 45: 1558–1565. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fan X, Peng W, Li Y, Li X, Wang S, Zhang G, Zhang F: Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 4490–4493. 10.1002/adma.200801306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gao W, Alemany LB, Ci L, Ajayan PM: New insights into the structure and reduction of graphite oxide. Nat Chem 2009, 1: 403–408. 10.1038/nchem.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fernández-Merino MJ, Guardia L, Paredes JI, Villar-Rodil S, Solís-Fernández P, Maertínez-Alonso A, Tascón MD: Vitamin C is an ideal substitute for hydrazine in the reduction of graphene oxide suspensions. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 6426–6432. 10.1021/jp100603h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sun G, Long D, Liu X, Qiao W, Zhan L, Liang X, Ling L: Asymmetric capacitance response from the chemical characteristics of activated carbons in KOH electrolyte. J Electroanal Chem 2011, 659: 161–167. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Frackowiak E, Metenier K, Bertagna V, Beguin F: Supercapacitor electrodes from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77: 2421–2423. 10.1063/1.1290146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pan H, Poh CK, Feng YP, Lin J: Supercapacitor electrodes from tubes-in-tube carbon nanostructures. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 6120–6125. 10.1021/cm071527e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stoller MD, Park S, Zhu Y, An J, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3498–3502. 10.1021/nl802558y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Meher SK, Justin P, Rao GR: Pine-cone morphology and pseudocapacitive behavior of nanoporous nickel oxide. Electrochim Acta 2010, 55: 8388–8396. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang J, Jiang J, Li H, Zhao XS: A high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor fabricated with graphene-based electrodes. Energy & Environmental Science 2011, 4: 4009–4015. 10.1039/c1ee01354h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    He Y, Chen W, Li X, Zhang Z, Fu J, Zhao C, Xie E: Freestanding three-dimensional graphene/MnO2 composite networks as ultralight and flexible supercapacitor electrodes. ACS Nano 2013, 7: 174–182. 10.1021/nn304833s

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51107076), Distinguished Young Scientist Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201215), China University of Petroleum (13CX02004A), Outstanding Young Scientist Foundation of Shandong Province (BS2009NJ014), and Key Sci-Tech Development Project of Shandong Province (2009GG10007006).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuping Zhuo or Wei Xing.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

WS and XW performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript together. JZ checked the figures and gave the final approval of the version to be published. FG performed partial experiments. SZ supervised the project. HC guided the experiment on the CO2 supercritical drying process of RGOA. WX guided the idea, revised, and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Weijiang Si, Xiaozhong Wu contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Si, W., Wu, X., Zhou, J. et al. Reduced graphene oxide aerogel with high-rate supercapacitive performance in aqueous electrolytes. Nanoscale Res Lett 8, 247 (2013).

Download citation


  • Supercapacitor
  • Reduced graphene oxide aerogel
  • Current density
  • Cyclic voltammetry