Skip to content

Advertisement

Nanoscale Research Letters

Nanoscale Research Letters Cover Image
Nano Express
Open Access

Well-integrated ZnO nanorod arrays on conductive textiles by electrochemical synthesis and their physical properties

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-28

©  Ko et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

Received: 27 November 2012

Accepted: 4 January 2013

Published: 15 January 2013

Abstract

We reported well-integrated zinc oxide (ZnO) nanorod arrays (NRAs) on conductive textiles (CTs) and their structural and optical properties. The integrated ZnO NRAs were synthesized by cathodic electrochemical deposition on the ZnO seed layer-coated CT substrate in ultrasonic bath. The ZnO NRAs were regularly and densely grown as well as vertically aligned on the overall surface of CT substrate, in comparison with the grown ZnO NRAs without ZnO seed layer or ultrasonication. Additionally, their morphologies and sizes can be efficiently controlled by changing the external cathodic voltage between the ZnO seed-coated CT substrate and the counter electrode. At an external cathodic voltage of −2 V, the photoluminescence property of ZnO NRAs was optimized with good crystallinity and high density.

Keywords

ZnO nanorod arraysElectrochemical depositionConductive textile

Background

Vertically aligned one-dimensional (1D) zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures, such as nanorod and nanowire arrays, have attracted much interest in various application fields including field-emission devices, light-emitting diodes, piezoelectric devices, dye-sensitized solar cells, chemical sensors, and photodetectors due to their superior structural and optical properties compared to the bulk structure [1–7]. Over the past decade, there have been many efforts for controlling the structural and morphological properties of the 1D ZnO nanostructures with high density and uniformity because their size, shape, distribution, and crystallinity are closely related to the physical properties [8–10]. Furthermore, the hierarchical architectures built by the 1D ZnO nanostructures with 2D or 3D templates, which look like flowers or urchins, have potentially exhibited the improvements of device performance due to the highly extended surface area and density [11–14]. Nowadays, some vigorous attempts begin to be focused on the growth and deposition of the 1D ZnO nanostructures on various functional material substrates, for example, indium tin oxide-coated polyethylene terephthalate (i.e., ITO/PET) films, metal foils, graphenes, and cellulose fibers, thus leading to the merits of flexible and bendable feasibility with light weight and low cost [15–18].

On the other hand, the fabrication technique of conductive textiles (CTs) has been considerably developed by utilizing an electroless metallization of polymer fibers, and thus they have been used for electromagnetic interference shielding fabrics and flexible electrodes [19, 20]. In addition, the CTs can be a promising candidate as substrate for integrating the 1D ZnO nanostructures by employing the electrochemical deposition (ED) method. When electrons are supplied into the conductive surface in growth solution, ZnO nanorods can be readily synthesized and controlled at a low temperature by varying the external cathodic voltage [15, 21]. Therefore, the ED process with CT substrate can be a powerful and convenient fabrication method for preparing the vertically aligned 1D ZnO nanostructures on a conductive and flexible substrate. In this paper, we synthesized and controlled the integrated ZnO nanorod arrays (NRAs) on nickel (Ni)-coated PET fiber CTs by ED method with different external cathodic voltages. For more regular and dense ZnO NRAs, the CTs were coated by the ZnO seed solution, and the samples were treated by ultrasonic agitation during ED process.

Methods

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), which were of analytical grade. To synthesize the ZnO NRAs on CT substrates, we used the commercially available CT substrates which consisted of woven Ni-plated PET (i.e., Ni/PET) fibers. For preparing the working substrate, the CT substrate of 3 × 3 cm2 was cleaned by ethanol and deionized (DI) water in ultrasonic bath for 10 min, respectively, at room temperature. The seed solution was made by dissolving the 10 mM of zinc acetate dehydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2 2H2O) in 50 ml of ethanol and by adding 1.5 wt.% of sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (CH3(CH2)11OSO3Na). After that, the CF substrates were dipped into the seed solution and pulled up slowly. To achieve good adhesion between the coated seed layer and the surface of CT, the samples were placed in the oven at 130°C for 2 h. Meanwhile, the aqueous growth solution was prepared by dissolving the 10 mM of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2 6H2O) and 10 mM of hexamethylenetetramine ((CH2)6 N4) in 900 ml of DI water at 74 to 76°C under magnetic stirring. For growing the ZnO NRAs via the ED process, we used a simple two-electrode system containing the working electrode (i.e., deposited sample) and counter electrode (i.e., platinum mesh) since it is convenient and cost-effective for the synthesis of metal oxides nanostructures [22, 23]. For providing reliable information on the growth condition in ED process, the time-dependent applied current densities were recorded at different external cathodic voltages. In order to investigate the effect of external cathodic voltage on the growth property of ZnO NRAs, the samples were fabricated at various cathodic voltages from −1.6 to −2.8 V for 1 h. Herein, the pH value of growth solution was measured in the range of approximately 6.25 to 6.5 during the ED process. The morphologies and structural properties were observed by using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; LEO SUPRA 55, Carl Zeiss, Reutlingen, Germany) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM 200CX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The crystallinity and optical property were analyzed by the X-ray diffraction (XRD; M18XHF-SRA, Mac Science Ltd., Yokohama, Japan) patterns and the photoluminescence (PL; RPM2000, Accent Optical Technologies, York, UK) spectra, respectively.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of ED process for the ZnO NRAs on CT substrates and their corresponding FE-SEM images including Figure 1a, the preparation of CT substrate; Figure 1b, the ZnO seed-coated CT substrate; and Figure 1c, the integrated ZnO NRAs on the seed-coated CT substrate. Here, the ED process was carried out under ultrasonic agitation. As shown in Figure 1a, the flexible Ni/PET fibers with diameters of approximately 20 μm were woven into the textile. After the CT substrate was coated by the seed solution and dried thermally, a thin ZnO seed layer was formed, as can be seen in the SEM image of Figure 1. When the seed-coated CT substrate was immersed into the growth solution and supplied by electrons, the seed layer provided ZnO crystal nuclei sites which allowed for growing the ZnO NRAs densely and vertically. As compared in the SEM images of Figure 1a,b, it can be clearly observed that the ZnO seed of approximately 5 to 20 nm was coated on the surface of Ni/PET fibers. Therefore, as shown in Figure 1c, the ZnO NRAs can be integrated into the whole surface of Ni/PET fibers after the ED process, thanks to the seed layer and ultrasonication. Typically, in ED process, the zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)2) nanostructure is formed at the surface of seed layer and it is changed into the ZnO nanostructure by dehydration. As the cathodic voltage is applied externally to the working electrode, the hydroxide (OH−) ions are produced at the seed layer due to the reduction of precursors including the nitrate ions and hydrogen peroxides [24]. In that time, the Zn2+ ions are diffused into the seed layer by the Coulombic attraction under strong electric field and then combined with OH− ions. Finally, the ZnO NRAs are formed and self-assembled with a preferred growth directionality of c-axis in wurtzite crystal structure.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram. ED process for the ZnO NRAs on CT substrates. (a) The preparation of CT substrate, (b) the ZnO seed-coated CT substrate, and (c) the integrated ZnO NRAs on the seed-coated CT substrate.

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the integrated ZnO NRAs on the seed-coated CT substrate at an external cathodic voltage of −2 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation. The insets of Figure 2c show the magnified SEM image of the selected region and the photographs of the bare CT and the ZnO NRAs-integrated CT substrate. In the perspective view of the sample in Figure 2a, the shape of the textile was kept intact. With a closer view, as shown in Figure 2b, the ZnO NRAs were densely and clearly coated over the overall surface of Ni/PET fibers with few ZnO microrods. During the ED process, indeed, the ZnO was formed not only at the surface of seed layer, but also in the growth solution because some Zn2+ ions react with the remaining OH− ions supported from hexamethylenetetramine. Therefore, some zinc hydroxides were created and grown into the microrods in growth solution, which were attached at the already organized ZnO NRAs on the seed layer. For this reason, the ultrasonic agitation was employed to avoid such attachments. As shown in Figure 2c, it can be clearly observed that the ZnO nanorods were aligned with varying vertical angle and integrated with the regular-sized ones. The sizes/heights of ZnO nanorods were approximately estimated to be about 65 to 80 nm/600 to 800 nm. From the photographs, the ZnO NRAs were clearly deposited on the seed-coated CT substrate. Additionally, the ZnO NRAs-integrated CT substrate became much darker compared to the bare CT substrate due to the antireflection effect, because the ZnO NRAs provide a graded effective refractive index profile between air and the CT substrate [25, 26]. Therefore, the CT substrate can absorb more light from air via the ZnO NRAs due to the reduced surface reflection, thus leading to a black-colored surface like black silicon [27].
Figure 2

FE-SEM micrographs. Integrated ZnO NRAs on the seed-coated CT substrate at an external cathodic voltage of −2 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation. (a) Low magnification, (b) medium magnification, and (c) high magnification. The insets of (c) show the magnified FE-SEM image of the selected region and the photographs of the bare CT and the ZnO NRAs integrated CT substrate.

To investigate the effects of seed layer and ultrasonic agitation on the growth property, the ZnO NRAs were synthesized on bare CT substrate in ultrasonic bath (i.e., without seed layer) and were also synthesized on the seed-coated CT substrate without ultrasonic agitation. Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the ZnO NRAs grown on Figure 3a, the bare CT substrate with the ultrasonic agitation; and in Figure 3b, the seed-coated CT substrate without the ultrasonic agitation For comparison, the external cathodic voltage and growth time were −2 V and 1 h, respectively, as the same condition of Figure 2. As shown in Figure 3a, the ZnO NRAs were grown on the seedless CT substrate. In fact, it was previously understood that the ZnO NRAs could be formed with no seed layer by the ED process [28, 29]. However, the size and distribution of ZnO nanorods were not regular and the vertical alignment was poor. Since the ZnO nuclei were randomly created and organized without seed layer, the ZnO nanorods were formed with different sizes and they were aligned obliquely along each growth direction. For the grown sample without the aid of ultrasonic agitation in Figure 3b, on the contrary, the ZnO NRAs were densely and vertically formed, but many microrods were attached to them. As explained in Figure 2, some zinc hydroxides were already formed in growth solution, and the microrods readily adhered to the ZnO NRAs when the ultrasonic agitation was not applied to the aqueous growth solution. Therefore, the seed layer and ultrasonic agitation are crucial to obtain the well-integrated ZnO NRAs on CT substrates.
Figure 3

FE-SEM micrographs. ZnO NRAs grown on (a), the bare CT substrate with the ultrasonic agitation; and (b), the seed-coated CT substrate without the ultrasonic agitation. For comparison, the external cathodic voltage and growth time were −2 V and 1 h, respectively, as the same condition of Figure 2.

Figure 4 shows the SEM images for the synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages of Figure 4a, −1.6 V; Figure 4b, −2.4 V; and Figure 4c, −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation; and Figure 4d, the current density as a function of growth time at different external cathodic voltages. The insets of Figure 4a,b,c show the magnified SEM images of the selected region of the corresponding samples. Below −1.6 V of external cathodic voltage, the ZnO NRAs could not be formed due to the insufficient electron supply under a low external cathodic voltage. In contrast, the size of ZnO was dramatically increased with increasing the external cathodic voltage to −2.4 and −2.8 V. In general, the ZnO nanorods may be grown anisotropically under ED conditions. While the Zn2+ ions diffuse rapidly into the polar plane, they cannot diffuse into the nonpolar plane relatively because the hexamine molecules were early attached to the ZnO pillars, thus blocking out the reaction between the Zn2+ and OH− ions [30]. Accordingly, the ZnO nanorods are grown along the polar planes corresponding to the c-axis of wurtzite crystal structure. At high external cathodic voltage, however, the strong electric field causes the faster diffusion of Zn2+ ions which leads to the combination with the OH− ions at the pillars. The size of ZnO nanorods becomes larger due to the isotropic growth. At −2.4 V, the shape of the CTs was still kept, but the boundaries between the Ni/PET fibers were somewhat not well-defined in Figure 4b. As shown in the inset, the sizes of thick ZnO microstructures were estimated to be approximately 0.5 to 1 μm and their surface looked like a porous film due to the closely packed ZnO microstructures. When the external cathodic voltage was increased to −2.8 V, the deposited ZnO was much thicker and the shape of the CTs was indistinguishable (Figure 4c). As can be seen in the inset, the sizes of thick ZnO microstructures were distributed to be approximately 2.5 to 4 μm. Figure 4d shows the measured current densities at different external cathodic voltages. During the ED process for 1 h, the current densities were observed to be about 0.25 to 0.35, 0.37 to 0.47, 3.74 to 3.97, and 5.24 to 6.67 mA/cm2 at the external cathodic voltages of −1.6, −2, −2.4 and −2.8 V, respectively. At low external cathodic voltages of −1.6 and −2 V, the current density was slightly changed and stabilized. But the current density somewhat fluctuated at high external cathodic voltage of −2.4 V, and it became more unstable at −2.8 V. This is probably attributed to the large variation of electrolyte at high external cathodic voltage.
Figure 4

FE-SEM micrographs and applied current densities. Synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages of (a) −1.6 V, (b) −2.4 V, and (c) −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation, and (d) current density as a function of growth time at different external cathodic voltages. The insets of (a to c) show the magnified SEM images of the selected region of the corresponding samples.

Figure 5a shows the 2θ scan XRD patterns of the synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages from −1.6 to −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation, and Figure 5b shows the TEM image and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the single nanorod detached from the ZnO NRAs grown at −2 V. For comparison, the XRD pattern of bare CT substrate is also given in Figure 5a. The high-resolution (HR) TEM image of the ZnO nanorod is also shown in the inset of Figure 5b. As can be seen in all XRD patterns, the PET and Ni peaks were clearly observed at the same positions. At −1.6 V, meanwhile, it was difficult to observe the ZnO XRD peaks since the ZnO was not formed as shown in Figure 4a. However, when the external cathodic voltage was increased above −2 V, the ZnO XRD peaks were clearly observed. Herein, the ZnO XRD patterns were indexed to the wurtzite structure of ZnO (JCPDS card number 89-1397). For three ZnO-deposited samples (−2, −2.4, and −2.8 V), the dominant ZnO (002) peaks were commonly observed, indicating that the ZnO was preferentially grown along the c-axis. As the external cathodic voltage was increased from −2 to −2.8 V, the ZnO (002) peak intensity was gradually increased and the Ni/PET peaks were decreased relatively. This may be caused by the thicker and closely packed ZnO as shown in Figure 4. To obtain a single ZnO nanorod for TEM images and SAED patterns, the ZnO NRAs integrated sample (Figure 2) was agitated in ethanol solution by ultrasonication. In Figure 5b, the single ZnO nanorod with size/height of 75/600 nm was shown, and the indexed SAED pattern confirmed that the ZnO nanorod was well crystallized with the wurtzite structure. As can be seen in the inset of Figure 5b, the lattice spacing of 0.52 nm was observed in the lattice fringes, which was also in well agreement with the d-spacing of the ZnO (002) crystal plane corresponding to 2θ = 34.4°.
Figure 5

XRD patterns and TEM images. (a) Synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages from −1.6 to −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation, and (b) TEM image (left) and SAED pattern (right) of the single nanorod detached from the ZnO NRAs grown at −2 V. For comparison, the XRD pattern of bare CT substrate is also given in (a). The inset of (b) shows the HR TEM image of the ZnO nanorod.

Figure 6 shows the room-temperature PL spectra of the bare CT substrate and the synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages from −1.6 to −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation. The inset shows the PL peak intensity and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the synthesized ZnO as a function of external cathodic voltage. Here, the PL emission was detected with an excitation at 266 nm using an Nd-YAG laser source. For the bare CT substrate, there was no PL emission peak due to the absence of the ZnO. Similarly, for the rarely synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate under a low external cathodic voltage of −1.6 V, a very weak PL emission peak was observed in the ultraviolet (UV) wavelength region. However, for the ZnO-deposited samples with external cathodic voltages of −2, −2.4, and −2.8 V, the narrow PL emission peaks were observed at wavelengths of 374.3, 377.8, and 380.2 nm, respectively. These PL emissions were attributed to the near band edge (NBE) transition and radial recombination in the direct bandgap of the deposited ZnO. Particularly, the PL intensity of UV emission was largely increased at −2 V (i.e., integrated ZnO NRAs on the seed-coated CT substrate). As shown in the inset, the PL intensity of UV emission at −2 V was increased by 10.5 times compared to that at −2.8 V and its FWHM was also minimized to 162 meV. This enhancement was caused mainly by the size and density of ZnO NRAs. As the size of ZnO nanorods is decreased and their surface area is increased, the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency and PL property can be improved [31]. However, the PL intensity of UV emission was degraded with increasing the external cathodic voltage above −2 V because the synthesized material further contains the Zn according to Pourbaix diagram for Zn2+ in aqueous solution [32]. Consequently, the well-integrated ZnO NRAs on the CT substrate could be fabricated by the ED process with the aid of ultrasonic agitation under a proper external cathodic voltage.
Figure 6

Room-temperature PL spectra. Bare CT substrate and the synthesized ZnO on the seed-coated CT substrate at different external cathodic voltages from −1.6 to −2.8 V for 1 h under ultrasonic agitation. The inset shows the PL peak intensity and FWHM of the synthesized ZnO as a function of external cathodic voltage.

Conclusions

The ZnO NRAs were successfully integrated on the CT substrate (i.e., woven by Ni/PET fibers) by the ED process using the seed layer and ultrasonic agitation under a proper external cathodic voltage of −2 V for 1 h. The sizes/heights of ZnO NRAs were distributed to be approximately 65 to 80 nm/600 to 800 nm, and they could be clearly coated over the whole surface of the CT substrate with the seed layer and ultrasonic agitation. In a comparative investigation, it is clearly observed that the seed layer and ultrasonic agitation played key roles in providing a uniform organization of the ZnO NRAs with good nuclei sites as well as removing the adhesive ZnO microrods. Additionally, the well-integrated ZnO NRAs exhibited a narrow and strong PL NBE emission with good crystallinity. This optimal ED process for the well-integrated ZnO NRAs on CT substrates can be an essential growth technique for producing flexible and wearable functional materials in ZnO-based optoelectronic and electrochemical devices.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the basic science research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (no. 2011-0026393).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electronics and Radio Engineering, Institute for Laser Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Li C, Fang G, Liu N, Li J, Liao L, Su F, Li G, Wu X, Zhao X: Structural, photoluminescence, and field emission properties of vertically well-aligned ZnO nanorod arrays. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 12566. 10.1021/jp0737808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lai E, Kim W, Yang P: Vertical nanowire array-based light emitting diodes. Nano Res 2008, 1: 123. 10.1007/s12274-008-8017-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang ZL, Song J: Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 2006, 312: 242. 10.1126/science.1124005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Xu S, Qin Y, Xu C, Wei Y, Yang R, Wang ZL: Self-powered nanowire devices. Nat Nanotech 2010, 5: 366. 10.1038/nnano.2010.46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang Q, Dandeneau CS, Zhou X, Cao G: ZnO nanostructures for dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 4087. 10.1002/adma.200803827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Park JY, Song DE, Kim SS: An approach to fabricating chemical sensors based on ZnO nanorod arrays. Nanotechnol 2008, 19: 105503. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/10/105503View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lu CY, Chang SJ, Chang SP, Lee CT, Kuo CF, Chang HM: Ultraviolet photodetectors with ZnO nanowires prepared on ZnO:Ga/glass templates. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 153101. 10.1063/1.2360219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang ZL: Zinc oxide nanostructures: growth, properties and applications. J Phys Condens Matter 2004, 16: R829. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Djurišić AB, Leung YH: Optical properties of ZnO nanostructures. Small 2006, 2: 944. 10.1002/smll.200600134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Baruah S, Dutta J: Hydrothermal growth of ZnO nanostructures. Sci Techno. Adv Mater 2009, 10: 013001. 10.1088/1468-6996/10/1/013001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Shen G, Bando Y, Lee CJ: Synthesis and evolution of novel hollow ZnO urchins by a simple thermal evaporation process. J Phys Chem B 2008, 109: 10578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lao JY, Wen JG, Ren ZF: Hierarchical ZnO nanostructures. Nano Lett 2002, 2: 1287. 10.1021/nl025753tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ko YH, Yu JS: Tunable growth of urchin-shaped ZnO nanostructures on patterned transparent substrates. Cryst Eng Comm 2012, 14: 5824. 10.1039/c2ce25284hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Elias J, Clément CL, Bechelany M, Michler J, Wang GY, Wang Z, Philipp L: Hollow urchin-like ZnO thin films by electrochemical deposition. Adv Mater 2012, 22: 1607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ko YH, Kim MS, Yu JS: Controllable electrochemical synthesis of ZnO nanorod arrays on flexible ITO/PET substrate and their structural and optical properties. App. Surf Sci 2012, 259: 99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Umar A, Kim BK, Kim JJ, Hahn YB: Optical and electrical properties of ZnO nanowires grown on aluminium foil by non-catalytic thermal evaporation. Nanotechnol 2007, 18: 17566.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Akhavan O: Graphene nanomesh by ZnO nanorod photocatalysts. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 4174. 10.1021/nn1007429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gullapalli H, Vemuru VSM, Kumar A, Mendez AB, Vajtai R, Terrones M, Nagarajaiah S, Ajayan PM: Flexible piezoelectric ZnO-paper nanocomposite strain sensor. Small 2010, 6: 1641. 10.1002/smll.201000254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Perumalraj R, Dasaradan BS: Electroless nickel plated composite materials for electromagnet compatibility. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2011, 36: 35.Google Scholar
  20. Anderson EB, Ingildeev D, Hermanutz F, Muller A, Schweizer M, Buchmeiser MR: Synthesis and dry-spinning fibers of sulfinyl-based poly(p-phenylene vinylene) (PPV) for semi-conductive textile applications. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 11851. 10.1039/c2jm30186eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee HK, Kim MS, Yu JS: Effect of AZO seed layer on electrochemical growth and optical properties of ZnO nanorod arrays on ITO glass. Nanotechnol 2011, 22: 445602. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/44/445602View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh DP, Singh J, Mishra PR, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON: Synthesis, characterization and application of semiconducting oxide (Cu2O and ZnO) nanostructures. Bull Mater Sci 2008, 31: 319. 10.1007/s12034-008-0051-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassan NK, Hashim MR, Douri YA, Heuseen KA: Current dependence growth of ZnO nanostructures by electrochemical deposition technique. Int J Electrochem Sci 2012, 7: 4625.Google Scholar
  24. Postels B, Bakin A, Wehmann HH, Suleiman M, Weimann T, Hinze P, Waag A: Electrodeposition of ZnO nanorods for device application. Appl Phys A 2008, 91: 595. 10.1007/s00339-008-4487-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ko YH, Yu JS: Structural and antireflective properties of ZnO nanorods synthesized using the sputtered ZnO seed layer for solar cell applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010, 10: 8095. 10.1166/jnn.2010.3020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee YJ, Ruby DS, Peters DW, McKenzie BB, Hsu JWPL: ZnO nanostructures as efficient antireflection layers in solar cells. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 1501. 10.1021/nl080659jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Baek SH, Noh BY, Park IK, Kim JH: Fabrication and characterization of silicon wire solar cells having ZnO nanorod antireflection coating on Al-doped ZnO seed layer. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 29. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-29View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauporté T, Bataille G, Joulaud L, Vermersch FJ: Well-aligned ZnO nanowire arrays prepared by seed-layer-free electrodeposition and their Cassie-Wenzel transition after hydrophobization. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 194. 10.1021/jp9087145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Suleiman MA, Mofor AC, Shaer AE, Bakin A, Wehmann HH, Waag A: Photoluminescence properties: catalyst-free ZnO nanorods and layers versus bulk ZnO. Appl Phys Lett 89: 231911.Google Scholar
  30. Sugunan A, Warad HC, Boman M, Dutta J: Zinc oxide nanowires in chemical bath on seeded substrates: role of hexamine. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2006, 39: 49. 10.1007/s10971-006-6969-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang CJ, Wang SM, Liang SW, Chang YH, Chen C, Shieh JM: Low-temperature growth of ZnO nanorods in anodic aluminum oxide on Si substrate by atomic layer deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 033104. 10.1063/1.2431786View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Beverskog B, Puigdomenech I: Revised Pourbaix diagrams for zinc at 25–300°C. Corros Sci 1997, 39: 107. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)89246-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ko et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement