Skip to main content

Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle-accumulated bilayer photoelectrode and condenser lens-assisted solar concentrator on light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells


TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) with a size of 240 nm (T240), used as a light-scattering layer, were applied on 25-nm-sized TiO2 NPs (T25) that were used as a dye-absorbing layer in the photoelectrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In addition, the incident light was concentrated via a condenser lens, and the effect of light concentration on the capacity of the light-scattering layer was systematically investigated. At the optimized focal length of the condenser lens, T25/T240 double layer (DL)-based DSSCs with the photoactive area of 0.36 cm2 were found to have the short circuit current (Isc) of 11.92 mA, the open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.74 V, and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of approximately 4.11%, which is significantly improved when they were compared to the T25 single layer (SL)-based DSSCs without using a solar concentrator (the corresponding values were the Isc of 2.53 mA, the Voc of 0.69, and the PCE of 3.57%). Thus, the use of the optimized light harvesting structure in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs in conjunction with light concentration was found to significantly enhance the power output of DSSCs.


Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been developed extensively because of the relatively low cost involved in their manufacturing processes [1]. Numerous research groups have reported the enhancement of the light-to-electricity power output of DSSCs by employing newly developed materials and modifying the intrinsic solar cell structures [210]. An alternative approach for enhancing the light-to-electricity power output of DSSCs is to use a solar concentrator, which generally employs optical lenses or mirrors [11, 12]. The optical lens is incorporated to improve the power output of photovoltaic cells (PVs) by concentrating a large amount of sunlight onto a small area of photoactive layers in various PVs. In general, the power output of DSSCs decreases with an increase in the cell area of the photoactive layer. However, this problem can be solved by employing a solar concentrator that provides the advantages of increased power output. The application of an optical lens-based solar concentrator system mounted on top of DSSCs still poses several challenges in terms of efficiency, cost-effectiveness of optical design, and the provision of uniform and concentrated illumination on a DSSC regardless of surrounding environmental changes [1315]. Furthermore, various complex phenomena, including light scattering, recombination of electron-hole pairs, and dye degradation, in the photoactive layers of DSSCs can occur when the intensity of incident light is changed by varying the beam focus of solar concentrator [16]. The question arises as to how we can optimize the effects of the intrinsic cell structure and solar concentrator when concentrated light is incident on the photoactive layer structures in DSSCs.

In this work, we systematically investigated the effects of using a light-scattering layer in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs along with studying the effects of using a condenser lens-based solar concentrator on the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs. Briefly, three different photoelectrode structures fabricated with a T25/T25-accumulated double layer (T25/T25 DL), a T25/T240-accumulated double layer (T25/T240 DL), and a T240/T240-accumulated double layer (T240/T240 DL) were examined for verifying the effects of using a light-scattering layer under intensified light irradiation conditions tuned by a condenser lens-based solar concentrator. Here, T25 and T240 indicate commercialized TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) with an average diameter of approximately 25 and 240 nm, respectively. With the optimized design of the condenser lens-based solar concentrator developed in this approach, we report a novel T25/T240 DL-based DSSC system with condenser lens-based solar concentrator that exhibits a photocurrent output of approximately 11.92 mA, an open circuit voltage of 0.74 V, and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of approximately 4.11%, which exhibits a much better photovoltaic performance compared to T25/T25 DL- and T240/T240 DL-based DSSCs with condenser lens-based solar concentrator.


Commercially available TiO2 NPs (T25, Degussa; T240, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used without further treatment. In order to prepare TiO2 NP paste for the screen-printing process, 6 g of TiO2 NPs, 15 g of ethanol, 1 mL of acetic acid (CH3COOH), and 20 g of terpineol were mixed in a vial and sonicated for 1 h. A solution of 3 g of ethylcellulose dissolved in 27 g of ethanol was separately prepared and subsequently added to the TiO2 NP-dispersed solution, which was then sonicated for 30 min [5, 17]. As a photoelectrode layer, TiO2 NP-accumulated thin layer was applied via a screen-printing process on a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass (SnO2:F, 7 Ω/sq, Pilkington, Boston, USA) with a photoactive area of 0.6 × 0.6 cm2, as shown in Figure 1. The T25 single layer (T25 SL), T25/T25 DL, T25/T240 DL, and T240/T240 DL were separately prepared for comparison purposes. The resulting TiO2 NP-accumulated layer formed on the FTO glass via the screen-printing process was then sintered in an electric furnace at 500°C for 30 min and subsequently immersed in anhydrous ethanol containing 0.3 mM of Ru dye (Bu4N)2[Ru(Hdcbpy)2-(NCS)2] (N719 dye, Solaronix, Zollikon, Switzerland) for 24 h at room temperature in order to allow the dye molecules to attach themselves to the entire surface of the TiO2 NPs. The dye-soaked TiO2-NP-based photoelectrode was then rinsed with ethanol and dried in a convection oven at 80°C for 10 min. As a counter electrode, we prepared Pt-coated FTO glass using an ion sputter (model no. E1010, Hitachi, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) operated at 2.5 kV. Both the dye-soaked TiO2 NP-based photoelectrode and the Pt-coated counter electrode were sealed together with a hot-melt polymer film (60-μm thick, Surlyn, DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) that was inserted between them, and an iodide-based liquid electrolyte (AN-50, Solaronix) was then injected into the interspace between the electrodes. The current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of the resulting DSSCs fabricated in this study were measured under AM 1.5 simulated illumination with an intensity of 100 mW/cm2 (PEC-L11, Peccell Technologies, Inc., Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan). The intensity of sunlight illumination was calibrated using a standard Si photodiode detector with a KG-5 filter. The I–V curves were automatically recorded using a Keithley SMU 2400 source meter (Cleveland, OH, USA) by illuminating the DSSCs. The condenser lens-based solar concentrator employed in this study had a diameter of 15 mm, a center thickness of 3.35 mm, an edge thickness of 1.36 mm, and an effective focal length of 22.5 mm. The condenser lens was supported by a homemade vertical holder, and the focal length was changed by adjusting the rotating gauge.

Figure 1

Experimental setup for measuring the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs. (a) Photograph of the DSSC, condenser lens-based solar concentrator system, and solar simulator, (b) schematic of light pathways in condenser lens-based solar concentrator system, and (c) SEM images of top view and side view of TiO2 NP-accumulated photoelectrode of the DSSC (Here, T25 single layer: 25-nm-sized TiO2 NP layer; T25/T240 double layer: 240-nm-sized TiO2 NP light-scattering layer applied on 25-nm-sized TiO2 NP layer).

Results and discussion

First, in order to examine the effects of the condenser lens-based solar concentrator on the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs, we varied the focal length of the light pathway in the condenser lens system such that a reference DSSC with an approximately 10-μm-thick T25 single layer (T25 SL) was exposed to various concentrated sunlight conditions, as shown in Figure 1. Here, by simulating the optical geometries in the given condenser lens system, we estimated that the circular area of the focused beam can fully cover a 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 photoactive layer as long as the optical length is less than 10 mm. Also, when condenser lens system was applied, the temperature measured by a thermocouple installed on top of DSSC was approximately 40°C or less, in which no additional cooling system was required.

From Table 1, we can clearly observe that the short circuit current (Isc) significantly increases with the focal length of the condenser lens system (i.e., higher light concentration). With the use of the condenser lens system, the PCE of the reference T25 SL-based DSSC was found to slightly decrease from approximately 3.57% (without the condenser lens) to approximately 3.38%, when the focal length was set to the maximum value of approximately 10 mm. This is owing to the increase of power input caused by higher light concentration with longer focal length. However, as the light concentration increased, both Isc and Voc were observed to make a significant increase. This is consistent with the general theoretical model given in Equation 1 for conventional inorganic solar cells that Isc increases linearly with increasing light intensity (X), and Voc increases logarithmically with increasing Isc and X:

V OC nkT q ln X · I SC I o = nkT q ln X + const

where, n is the diode quality factor, k is the Boltzmann's constant, T is the absolute temperature, q is the electronic charge, and Io is the reverse saturation current.

Table 1 Summary of photovoltaic characteristics of T25-accumulated single layer (T25 SL)-based DSSCs

In order to examine the effect of the TiO2 light-scattering layer on the performance of DSSCs, we fabricated three different DSSCs with photoelectrodes composed of (1) a T25/T25 DL, (2) T25/T240 DL, and (3) T240/T240 DL with a total thickness of approximately 18 μm. After the T240-accumulated light-scattering layer was applied on the T25 layer, the resulting PCE of the fabricated DSSCs without condenser lens improved from approximately 3.57% (i.e., T25-SL-based DSSC, Table 1) to approximately 4.36% (i.e., T25/T240-DL-based DSSC, Figure 2c), corresponding to an approximately 22% increment. This suggests that the T240-accumulated layer could play the role of dye molecule absorbing or light scattering or both. The former can be directly ascertained by examining the photovoltaic performance of the DSSC based on a T240/T240-DL-based photoactive layer as shown in Figure 2. Consequently, an Isc of 0.62 mA, a Voc of 0.75, a fill factor (FF) of 0.50, and a PCE of 0.64% were obtained for the DSSC based on the T240/T240-DL-based photoactive layer under a 1 sun condition at AM 1.5, indicating that the number concentration of photogenerated electrons is negligibly small and the role of the absorbing dye molecules in increasing the PCE in the pure T240-accumulated layer is relatively very weak. Therefore, the higher PCE obtained for the T25/T240-DL-based DSSC when compared with that of the T25-SL-based DSSC is a consequence of greater light scattering. As shown in Figure 2a, the values of Isc of both T25/T25 DL and T25/T240 DL were very similar and significantly increased with increasing the light concentration. Also, the presence of larger primary size of TiO2 NPs (i.e., T240) in the photoelectrode generated higher value of Voc than smaller TiO2 NPs (i.e., T25), and the value of Voc was increased with increasing the light concentration as shown in Figure 2b. Therefore, the resulting PCE of T25/T240-DL©-based DSSCs remained very stably with the highest values under the higher light concentrations as shown in Figure 2c. Here, © denotes the condenser lens-based solar concentrator installed on top of DSSCs.

Figure 2

Photovoltaic properties of T25/T25-DL-, T25/T240-DL-, and T240/T240-DL-based DSSCs. The evolution of (a) Isc, (b) Voc, and (c) PCE of T25/T25-DL-, T25/T240-DL-, and T240/T240-DL-based DSSCs as a function of light concentration.

Table 2 and Figures 3 and 4 provide further details on the photovoltaic performance of three different types of DSSCs with T25/T25, T25/T240, and T240/T240 DL. With the synergistic effect of the presence of the light-scattering layer in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs and the adoption of maximized light concentration (i.e., 3.72 Suns) in this study, T25/T240-DL©-DSSCs generated the Isc of 11.92 mA at 0.36 cm2, which is comparable with the Isc of 12.12 mA at 0.36 cm2 generated by T25/T25-DL©-DSSCs. However, the resulting PCE of T25/T240-DL©-DSSCs was approximately 4.11%, which is larger than approximately 3.84% of T25/T25-DL©-DSSCs. This is because the application of the light-scattering layer (T240) on top of the dye-absorbing layer (T25) (i.e., T25/T240 DL) increases light retention in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs; consequently, a considerably larger number of photogenerated electrons are injected into the TiO2 layer, resulting in relatively high photocurrent. Also, the adoption of T25/T240 DL© increased the resulting Voc of 0.74 V, which is 6% increase compared to the Voc of 0.70 V made by T25/T25 DL©. Furthermore, the increase in photogenerated electrons appears to slightly lower the recombination (Rrec) and transport resistances (Rt), and simultaneously increase the electron lifetime (τe) due to increase in the diffusion coefficient of electrons. This result suggests that trapping and detrapping of electrons in TiO2 layers occurs at shallow levels under very high light intensity, and therefore, the electron transfer rate in the multi-layered DSSCs is considerably greater than that in the reference single-layered DSSCs.

Table 2 Summary of photovoltaic characteristics of DSSCs with T25/T25 DL, T25/T240 DL and T240/T240 DL
Figure 3

I V characteristics of T25/T25-DL-, T25/T240-DL-, and T240/T240-DL-based DSSCs with condenser lens-based solar concentrator.

Figure 4

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis of DSSCs with T25/T25, T25/T240, and T240/T240 DL. (a) Nyquist plots and (b) Bode plots of T25/T25-DL-, T25/T240-DL-, and T240/T240-DL-based DSSCs with condenser lens-based solar concentrator.

In order to qualitatively verify the increase of power output by using the T25/T240-DL©-based DSSCs, we tried to operate a small propeller installed on an electric motor (rated voltage = 0.6 V, rated current = 12 mA, Jinlong Machinery & Electronics Co., Zhejiang, China) powered by the T25/T240-DL-based DSSC with or without condenser lens-based solar concentrator. Figure 5a, b shows that the electric motor did not operate by the T25/T240-DL-based DSSC without using condenser lens-based solar concentrator under the light illumination because the power output was not sufficient. However, after installing the light concentrator on top of the T25/T240-DL-based DSSC, the electric motor operated very fast under light illumination as shown in Figure 5c, d, suggesting that the T25/T240-DL©-based DSSC sufficiently generated power output to operate the given electric motor. This realizes a potential concept for a solar cell module composed of an optimized solar concentrator and a DSSC, which enables to operate portable electric devices with relatively high power input.

Figure 5

Demonstration of high power output from solar concentrator-assisted T25/T240-DL-based DSSC. Photographs of a propeller installed on an electric motor powered by a T25/T240-DL-based DSSC without condenser lens-based solar concentrator (a) before and (b) after light illumination (Here, the propeller did not rotate after light illumination). Photographs of a propeller installed on an electric motor powered by a T25/T240-DL-based DSSC with condenser lens-based solar concentrator (c) before and (d) after light illumination (Here, the propeller rotated very fast after light illumination).


In this study, we obtained the optimized intensity and focal area of incident light in a simple condenser lens-based solar concentrator by adjusting the focal length of light pathways for a reference DSSC with a T25 SL. Further, we verified the role of a T240-accumulated layer applied on top of the T25-accumulated dye-absorbing layer to serve as a strong light-scattering medium. Furthermore, the light-scattering capacity of the T240 layer in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs was found to be enhanced upon precisely concentrating the incident light with the assistance of the condenser lens-based solar concentrator. On comparison of the photovoltaic performance of the T25/T25-DL-, T25/T240-DL-, and T240/T240-DL-based DSSCs with and without the use of concentrated incident light, the optimized photoelectrode structures exhibited both enhanced dye-absorbing properties (T25) and light-scattering properties (T240) under highly concentrated light irradiation, resulting in increased values of Isc and PCE. The presence of the light-scattering layer in the photoelectrodes of DSSCs and the use of the condenser lens system to concentrate the irradiated light can synergistically enhance the inherent photovoltaic performance of DSSCs.


  1. 1.

    O’Regan B, Grätzel M: A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353: 737. 10.1038/353737a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Law M, Greene LE, Johnwon JC, Saykally R, Yang P: Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat Mater 2005, 4: 455. 10.1038/nmat1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mor GK, Shankar K, Paulose M, Varghese OK, Grimes CA: Use of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cell. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 215. 10.1021/nl052099j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Koo HJ, Kim YJ, Lee YH, Lee WI, Kim K, Park NG: Nano-embossed hollow spherical TiO2 as bifunctional material for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 195. 10.1002/adma.200700840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ahn JY, Cheon HK, Kim WD, Kang YJ, Kim JM, Lee DW, Cho CY, Hwang YH, Park HS, Kang JW, Kim SH: Aero-sol–gel synthesis and photovoltaic properties of mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 2012, 188: 216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ko SH, Lee DH, Kim HW, Nam KH, Yeo JY, Hong SJ, Grigoropoulos CP, Sung HJ: Nanoforest of hydrothermally grown hierarchical ZnO nanowires for a high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 666. 10.1021/nl1037962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhu K, Neale NR, Miedaner A, Frank AJ: Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Nano Lett 2007, 7(1):69. 10.1021/nl062000o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tricoli A, Wallerand AS, Righettoni M: Highly porous TiO2 films for dye sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 14254. 10.1039/c2jm15953h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Du P, Song L, Xiong J, Li N, Wang L, Xi Z, Wang N, Gao L, Zhu H: Dye-sensitized solar cells based on anatase TiO2/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite nanofibers photoanode. Electrochim Acta 2013, 87: 651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shalan AE, Rashad MM, Yu Y, Lira-Cantu M, Abdel-Mottaleb MSA: Controlling the microstructure and properties of titania nanopowders for high efficiency dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 2013, 89: 469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Choi SC, Cho ENR, Lee SM, Kim YW, Lee DW: Development of a high-efficiency laminated dye-sensitized solar cell with a condenser lens. Opt Express 2011, 19: A818. 10.1364/OE.19.00A818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Choi SC, Cho ENR, Lee SM, Kim YW, Lee DW: Evaluation of characteristics for dye-sensitized solar cell with reflector applied. Opt Express 2011, 19: A710. 10.1364/OE.19.00A710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bohannon J: Photovoltaics in focus. Science 2007, 315: 792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nishimura S, Abrams N, Lewis BA, Halaoui LI, Mallouk TE, Benkstein KD, van de Lagemaat J, Frank AJ: Standing wave enhancement of red absorbance and photocurrent in dye-sensitized titanium dioxide photoelectrodes coupled to photonic crystals. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125(20):6306. 10.1021/ja034650p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mihi A, Miguez H: Origin of light-harvesting enhancement in colloidal-photonic-crystal-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 15968. 10.1021/jp051828g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Agrell HG, Lindgren J, Hagfeldt A: Degradation mechanisms in a dye-sensitized solar cell studied by UV–VIS and IR spectroscopy. Solar Energy 2003, 75: 169. 10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00248-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ahn JY, Kim JH, Moon KJ, Kim JH, Lee CS, Kim MY, Kang JW, Kim SH: Incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes into TiO2 nanowires for enhancing photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells via highly efficient electron transfer. Solar Energy 2013, 92: 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MEST) (2011–0013114).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Hyung Kim.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KJM, SWL, and YHL contributed equally to this work as first co-authors. KJM, SWL, and YHL fabricated TiO2 pastes, assembled various DSSCs, and made photovoltaic performance measurement. JYA participated in the SEM measurements. SJL and DWL participated in the design and manufacture of condenser lens-based solar concentrator. SHK provided guidance to KJM, SWL, YHL, JYA, and SJL as a supervisor and designed most of this research project. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.

Kook Joo Moon, Sun Woo Lee, Yong Hun Lee contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, K.J., Lee, S.W., Lee, Y.H. et al. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle-accumulated bilayer photoelectrode and condenser lens-assisted solar concentrator on light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 8, 283 (2013).

Download citation


  • Dye-sensitized solar cell
  • Solar concentrator
  • Plano-convex lens
  • Focal length
  • Light-scattering layer