- Nano Express
- Open Access
- Published:

# Tunable insulator-quantum Hall transition in a weakly interacting two-dimensional electron system

*Nanoscale Research Letters*
**volume 8**, Article number: 307 (2013)

## Abstract

We have performed low-temperature measurements on a gated two-dimensional electron system in which electron–electron (e-e) interactions are insignificant. At low magnetic fields, disorder-driven movement of the crossing of longitudinal and Hall resistivities (*ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy}) can be observed. Interestingly, by applying different gate voltages, we demonstrate that such a crossing at *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} can occur at a magnetic field higher, lower, or equal to the temperature-independent point in *ρ*_{xx} which corresponds to the direct insulator-quantum Hall transition. We explicitly show that *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} occurs at the inverse of the classical Drude mobility 1/*μ*_{D} rather than the crossing field corresponding to the insulator-quantum Hall transition. Moreover, we show that the background magnetoresistance can affect the transport properties of our device significantly. Thus, we suggest that great care must be taken when calculating the renormalized mobility caused by e-e interactions.

## Background

At low temperatures (*T*), disorder and electron–electron (e-e) interactions may govern the transport properties of a two-dimensional electron system (2DES) in which electrons are confined in a layer of the nanoscale, leading to the appearance of new regimes of transport behavior [1]. In the presence of sufficiently strong disorder, a 2DES may behave as an insulator in the sense that its longitudinal resistivity (*ρ*_{xx}) decreases with increasing *T*[2]. It is useful to probe the intriguing features of this 2D insulating state by applying a magnetic field (*B*) perpendicular to the plane of a 2DES [2–4]. In particular, the direct transition from an insulator (I) to a high filling factor (*v* ≥ 3) quantum Hall (QH) state continues to attract a great deal of both experimental [5–13] and theoretical [14–16] interest. This is motivated by the relevance of this transition to the zero-field metal-insulator transition [17] and by the insight it provides on the evolution of extended states at low magnetic fields. It has already been shown that the nature of the background disorder, in coexistence with e-e interactions, may influence the zero-field metallic behavior [18] and the QH plateau-plateau transitions [19, 20]. However, studies focused on the direct I-QH transitions in a 2DES with different kinds of disorder are still lacking. Previously, we have studied a 2DES containing self-assembled InAs quantum dots [11], providing a predominantly short-range character to the disorder. We observed multiple *T*-independent points in *ρ*_{
xx
}(*B*), indicating a series of transitions between a low-field insulator and a QH state. The oscillatory amplitude of *ρ*_{
xx
}(*B*) was well fitted by the Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) theory [21–23], with amplitude given by

where *μ*_{q} represents the quantum mobility, *D*(*B*, *T*) = 2*π*^{2}*k*_{B}*m* * *T*/ℏ*eB* sinh (2*π*^{2}*k*_{B}*m* * *T*/ℏ*eB*), and *C* is a constant relevant to the value of *ρ*_{xx} at *B* = 0 T. The observation of the SdH oscillations suggests the possible existence of a Fermi-liquid metal. It should be pointed out that the SdH theory is derived by considering Landau quantization in the metallic regime without taking localization effects into account [24, 25]. By observing the *T*-dependent Hall slope, however, the importance of e-e interactions in the metallic regime can be demonstrated [26]. In addition, as reported in [27], with a long-range scattering potential, SdH-type oscillations appear to span from the insulating to the QH-like regime when the e-e interaction correction is weak. Recently, the significance of percolation has been revealed both experimentally [28] and theoretically [29, 30]. Therefore, to fully understand the direct I-QH transition, further studies on e-e interactions in the presence of background disorder are required.

At low *B*, quantum corrections resulting from weak localization (WL) and e-e interactions determine the temperature and magnetic field dependences of the conductivity, and both can lead to insulating behavior. The contribution of e-e interactions can be extracted after the suppression of WL at *B* > *B*_{tr}, where the transport magnetic field (*B*_{tr}) is given by \frac{\hslash}{4\mathit{eD\tau}} with reduced Planck's constant (ℏ), electron charge (*e*), diffusion constant (*D*), and transport relaxation time (*τ*). In systems with short-range potential fluctuations, the theory of e-e interactions is well established [31]. It is derived based on the interference of electron waves that follow different paths, one that is scattered off an impurity and another that is scattered by the potential oscillations (Friedel oscillation) created by all remaining electrons. The underlying physics is strongly related to the return probability of a scattered electron. In the diffusion regime (*k*_{B}*Tτ*/ℏ < < 1 with Boltzmann constant *k*_{B}), e-e interactions contribute only to the longitudinal conductivity (*σ*_{xx}) without modifying the Hall conductivity (*σ*_{xy}). On the other hand, in the ballistic regime (*k*_{B}*Tτ*/ℏ > > 1), e-e interactions contribute both to *σ*_{xx} and *σ*_{xy}, and effectively reduce to a renormalization of the transport mobility. However, the situation is different for long-range potential fluctuations, which are usually dominant in high-quality GaAs-based heterostructures in which the dopants are separated from the 2D electron gas by an undoped spacer. It is predicted that the interaction corrections can be suppressed at *B* = 0 but that they can eventually be restored at high magnetic fields *B* > 1/*μ*_{D} with enhanced return probability of scattered electrons, where *μ*_{D} represents the Drude mobility [32, 33]. Therefore, it is of great interest to study the direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in a system with long-range scattering, under which the e-e interactions can be sufficiently weak at low magnetic fields.

Theoretically, for either kind of background disorder, no specific feature of interaction correction is predicted in the intermediate regime where *k*_{B}*Tτ*/ℏ ≈ 1. Nevertheless, as generalized by Minkov et al. [34, 35], electron–electron interactions can still be decomposed into two parts. One, with properties similar to that in the diffusion regime, is termed the diffusion component, whereas the other, sharing common features with that in the ballistic limit, is known as the ballistic component. Therefore, by considering the renormalized transport mobility *μ′* induced by the ballistic contribution and the diffusion correction \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{d}, *σ*_{xx} is expressed as

It directly follows that the ballistic contribution \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{b} is given by \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{b}=\mathit{ne}\left(\mu \text{'}-{\mu}_{D}\right), where *n* is the electron density and *μ*_{D} is the transport mobility derived in the Drude model. After performing matrix inversion with the components given in Equations 2 and 3, the magnetoresistance *ρ*_{xx}(*B*) takes the parabolic form [36, 37]

The Hall slope *R*_{H} (*ρ*_{xy}/*B* with Hall resistivity *ρ*_{xy}) now becomes *T*-dependent which is ascribed to the diffusion correction \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{d}[38]. As will be shown later, Equations 3, 4, and 5 will be used to estimate the e-e interactions in our system. Moreover, both diffusive and ballistic parts will be studied.

As suggested by Huckestein [16], at the direct I-QH transition that is characterized by the approximately *T*-independent point in *ρ*_{xx},

While Equation 5 holds true in some experiments [2], in others it has been found that *ρ*_{xy} can be significantly higher than *ρ*_{xx} near the direct I-QH transition [10, 28]. On the other hand, *ρ*_{xy} can also be lower than *ρ*_{xx} near the direct I-QH transition in some systems [39]. Therefore, it is interesting to explore if it is possible to tune the direct I-QH transition within the *same* system so as to study the validity of Equation 5. In the original work of Huckestein [16], e-e interactions were not considered. Therefore, it is highly desirable to study a weakly disordered system in which e-e interactions are insignificant. In this paper, we investigate the direct I-QH transition in the presence of a long-range scattering potential, which is exploited as a means to suppress e-e interactions. We are able to tune the direct I-QH transition so that the corresponding field for which Equation 5 is satisfied can be higher or lower than, or even equal, to the crossing field that corresponds to the direct I-QH transition. Interestingly, we show that the inverse Drude mobility 1/*μ*_{D} is approximately equal to the field where *ρ*_{xx} crosses *ρ*_{xy}, rather than the one responsible for the direct I-QH transition. We also show that the onset of strong localization occurs at a relatively higher field which does not correspond to 1/*μ*_{D}.

## Methods

A gated modulation-doped AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure (LM4640) is used in our study. The following layer sequence was grown on a semi-insulating GaAs substrate: 1 μm GaAs, 200 nm Al_{0.33}Ga_{0.67}As, 40 nm Si-doped Al_{0.33}Ga_{0.67}As with doping concentration in cubic centimeter, and finally a 10-nm GaAs cap layer. The sample was mesa etched into a standard Hall bar pattern, and a NiCr/Au gate was deposited on top of it by thermal evaporation. The length and width of the Hall bars are 640 and 80 μm, respectively. Four-terminal magnetotransport measurements were performed in a top-loading He^{3} system using standard ac phase-sensitive lock-in techniques over the temperature range 0.32 K ≤ *T* ≤16 K at three different gate voltages *V*_{g} = −0.125, −0.145, and −0.165 V.

## Results and discussion

Figure 1a shows *ρ*_{xx}(*B*) and *ρ*_{xy}(*B*) at various *T* for *V*_{g} = −0.145 V. It can be seen from the inset in Figure 1 that the 2DES behaves as an insulator over the whole temperature range at all applied gate voltages. The Hall slope *R*_{H} shows a weak *T* dependence below *T* = 4 K and is approximately constant at high *T*, which can be seen clearly in Figure 1b for each *V*_{g}. For 1.84 T < *B* < 2.85 T, a well-developed *ν* = 2 QH state manifests itself in the quantized *ν* = 2 Hall plateau and the associated vanishing of *ρ*_{xx}. In order to study the transition from an insulator to a QH state, detailed results of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy} at low *T* are shown in Figure 2a,b,c for each *V*_{g}, and the converted *σ*_{xx} and *σ*_{xy} are presented in Figure 3. At *V*_{g} = −0.125 V, spin splitting is resolved as the effective disorder is decreased compared to that at *V*_{g} = −0.145 and −0.165 V. The reason for this is that the carrier density at *V*_{g} = −0.125 V is higher than those at *V*_{g} = −0.145 and −0.165 V. Following the suppression of weak localization, with its sharp negative magnetoresistance (NMR) at low magnetic fields, the 2DES undergoes a direct I-QH at *B* = 0.26, 0.26, and 0.29 T ≡ *B*_{c} for *V*_{g} = −0.125, −0.145, and −0.165 V, respectively, since there is no signature of *ν* = 2 or *ν* = 1 QH state near *B*_{c}. We note that in all cases, *B*_{c} > 10 *B*_{tr}. Therefore, it is believed that near the crossing field, weak localization effect is not significant in our system [37]. It is of fundamental interest to see in Figure 2d that the relative position of *B*_{c} with respect to that corresponding to the crossing of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy} is not necessarily equal. Following the transition, magneto-oscillations superimposed on the background of NMR are observed within the range 0.46 T ≤ *B* ≤ 1.03 T, 0.49 T ≤ *B* ≤ 1.12 T, and 0.53 T ≤ *B* ≤ 0.94 T for corresponding *V*_{g}, the oscillating amplitudes of which are all well fitted by Equation 1. The results are shown in Figure 4a,b,c for three different *V*_{g}. The good agreement with the SdH theory suggests that strong localization effects are not significant near *B*_{c}. This is consistent with our previous results, performed on both a delta-doped quantum well with additional modulation doping [13] and a modulation-doped AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure with a superlattice structure [27]. It follows that we can obtain the quantum mobility *μ*_{q} from the fits, which is expected to be an essential quantity regarding Landau quantization. The estimated *μ*_{q} are 0.88, 0.84, and 0.77 m^{2}/Vs for *V*_{g} = −0.125, −0.145, and −0.165 V, respectively. Moreover, from the oscillating period in 1/*B*, the carrier density *n* is shown to be *T*-independent such that a slight decrease in *R*_{H} at low *T* does not result from the enhancement of carrier density *n*. Instead, these results can be ascribed to e-e interactions.

At first glance, the *T*-dependent *R*_{H}, together with the parabolic MR in *ρ*_{xx} (denoted by the dashed lines in Figure 2 for each *V*_{g}), indicates that e-e interactions play an important role in our system. However, as will be shown later, the corrections provided by the diffusion and ballistic part of e-e interactions have opposite sign to each other, such that a cancelation of e-e interactions can be realized. Here we use two methods to analyze the contribution of e-e interactions. The first method is by fitting the measured *ρ*_{xx} to Equation 4, as shown by the blue symbols in Figure 5, from which we can obtain both \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{b} and \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{d}. The value of \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{d} is shown to be negative, as a result of the observed negative MR. We can see clearly from the dashed line in Figure 2 that the parabolic MR fits Equation 4 well at *B* > *B*_{c} but that it cannot be extended to the field where SdH oscillations occur. The obtained *μ′*, with an approximately linear dependence on *T* that is characteristic of the ballistic contribution of e-e interactions, is shown in Figure 6a,b,c for *V*_{g} = −0.125, −0.145, and −0.165 V, respectively. It should be mentioned that we cannot use this method to obtain *μ′* for *T* > 4 K since there is no apparent parabolic NMR, as shown in Figure 1a. The second method is based on the analysis of *σ*_{xy} using Equation 3, as shown in the inset to Figure 3 at the highest and lowest measured *T*. In this approach, *n* is determined from the SdH oscillations, from which the renormalized mobility can also be obtained at high *T* even without the parabolic negative MR induced by the diffusion correction. Here we limit the fitting intervals below 0.75 *B*_{max} to avoid the regime near *μ*_{D}*B* ~ 1, where *B*_{max} denotes the field corresponding to the appearance of maximum *σ*_{xy} at the lowest *T*. The fitting results are plotted at each *V*_{g} as red symbols in Figure 6, allowing a comparison with those obtained by the first method. The figures show that *μ*′ is proportional to *T* when *T* > 4 K. There is a clear discrepancy between the values obtained from the different fits at a relatively lower magnitude of *V*_{g}, which can be ascribed to the background MR (as will be discussed further below). Nevertheless, both cases indicate that the ballistic contribution, defined as \delta {\sigma}_{\mathit{xx}}^{b}=\mathit{ne}\left(\mu \text{'}-{\mu}_{\mathrm{D}}\right) with *μ*_{D} ≡ *μ*(*T* = 0*K*), has positive sign and therefore results in a partial cancelation of the diffusion correction. This is consistent with the prediction that the influence of e-e interactions is weakened in systems with long-range scattering potentials.

At high magnetic fields *B* > 1/*μ*_{D}, semiclassical effects should affect the background resistance, resulting in either positive or negative MR [40, 41]. Therefore, it is not possible to obtain reliable values for *μ*′ from the first method. Here we use the value of *μ*′(*T* = 0K), obtained by linearly extrapolating the high-*T* results from the second method to *T* = 0 K [27, 34], to estimate *μ*_{D} and so as to allow a discussion on the role of the non-oscillatory background. As demonstrated in Figure 6, the estimated values of *μ*_{D} are 4.59, 3.79, and 2.89 m^{2}/Vs for *V*_{g} = −0.125, −0.145, and −0.165 V, respectively, from which the corresponding ratios of *μ*_{D}/*μ*_{q} (5.22, 4.51, and 3.75) are determined with *μ*_{q} obtained by analyzing the amplitudes of SdH oscillations as shown in Figure 3. Since *μ*_{q} counts all scattering events whereas *μ*_{D} is sensitive only to large-angle ones, we can deduce the predominant scattering mechanism in a 2DES from the value of *μ*_{D}/*μ*_{q}[42–44]. We can see from Figure 6 that both methods give the same results at low *T* for *V*_{g} = −0.165 V, implying that the influence of background MR is diminished as the amount of short-range scattering potential is increased. In what follows, we will focus on the issue about direct I-QH transitions.

Huckestein has suggested that the direct I-QH transition can be identified as a crossover from weak localization to the onset of Landau quantization, resulting in a strong reduction of the conductivity. The field *B* ~ 1/*μ* separates these two regions which are characterized by opposite *T* dependences and are characterized by *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy}. In his argument, *μ* is taken to be the transport mobility. Nevertheless, recent experimental results [11–13] demonstrate that different mobilities should be introduced to understand transport near a direct I-QH transition; the observed direct I-QH transition can be irrelevant to Landau quantization, while Landau quantization does not always cause the formation of QH states. Furthermore, it has already been demonstrated in various kinds of 2DES that the crossing point *ρ*_{xx} = *ρ*_{xy} can occur before or after the appearance of the *T*-independent point that corresponds to a direct I-QH transition_{.} Moreover, the strongly *T*-dependent Hall slope induced by e-e interactions may affect the position of *ρ*_{xx} = *ρ*_{xy} at different *T*. As shown in Figure 2b for *V*_{g} = −0.145 V, the direct I-QH transition characterized by an approximately *T*-independent crossing point *B*_{c} in *ρ*_{xx} does occur at the field where *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} even though *ρ*_{xy} slightly depends on *T*. In addition, the inverse of the estimated Drude mobility 1/*μ*_{D} ~ 0.26 T is found to be close to *B*_{c}. To this extent, Huckestein's model seems to be reasonable. However, we can see that there are no apparent oscillations in *ρ*_{xx} around *B*_{c} and that the onset of strong localization occurs at *B* > 1.37 T, as characterized by a well-quantized *ν* = 2 Hall plateau and vanishing *ρ*_{xx} with increasing *B*, more than five times larger than *B*_{c}. In order to test the validity of the relation *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} at *B*_{c}, different gate voltages were applied to vary the effective amount of disorder and carrier density in the 2DES. As shown in Figure 2a, by increasing *V*_{g} to −0.125 V, *ρ*_{xx} becomes smaller than *ρ*_{xy} at *B*_{c} ~ 0.26 T, while *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} at a smaller field of approximately 0.21 T, which is shown to be close to 1/*μ*_{D} ~ 0.22 T rather than *B*_{c}. Moreover, by decreasing *V*_{g} to −0.165 V, *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} appears at *B* ~ 0.33 T which is larger than *B*_{c} ~ 0.29 T, as shown in Figure 2c. The inverse Drude mobility 1/*μ*_{D} ~ 0.35 is also found to be close to the field where *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} under this gate voltage. In all three cases, the crossings of *σ*_{xx} and *σ*_{xy} coincide with those of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy}, as shown in Figure 2 for each *V*_{g}. Therefore, our studies suggest that the field where *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} is governed by 1/*μ*_{D} and does not always correspond to that responsible for a direct I-QH transition as the influence of e-e interactions is not significant. As a result, *ρ*_{xx} ~ *ρ*_{xy} can occur on both sides of *B*_{c} as seen clearly in Figure 2d.

Interestingly, in the crossover from SdH oscillations to the QH state, we observe additional *T*-independent points, labeled by circles in Figure 2 for each *V*_{g}, other than the one corresponding to the onset of strong localization. As shown in Figure 2a for *V*_{g} = −0.125 V, the resistivity peaks at around *B* = 0.73 and 1.03 T appear to move with increasing *T*, a feature of the scaling behavior [7] of standard QH theory around the crossing points *B* = 0.70 and 0.96 T, respectively. Therefore, survival of the SdH theory for 0.46 T ≤ *B* ≤ 1.03 T reveals that semiclassical metallic transport may coexist with quantum localization. The superimposed background MR may be the reason for this coexistence, which is demonstrated by the upturned deviation from the parabolic dependence as shown in Figure 2a [45]. Therefore, it is reasonable to attribute the overestimated *μ′* shown by the blue symbols in Figure 5a to the influence of the background MR. Similar behavior can also be found for *V*_{g} = −0.145 V even though spin splitting is unresolved, indicating that the contribution of background MR mostly comes from semiclassical effects. However, such a crossing point cannot be observed for *V*_{g} = −0.165 V since there is no clear separation between extended and localized states with strong disorder. Only a single *T*-independent point corresponding to the onset of strong localization occurs at *B* = 1.12 T.

In order to check the validity of our present results, further experiments were performed on a device (H597) with nominally *T*-independent Hall slope at different applied gate voltages [27]. As shown in Figure 7a for *V*_{g} = −0.05 V, weakly insulating behavior occurs as *B* < 0.62 T ≡ *B*_{c}, which corresponds to the direct I-QH transition since there is no evidence of the *ν* = 1 or *ν* = 2 QH state near *B*_{c}. The crossing of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy} is found to occur at *B* ~ 0.5 T which is smaller than *B*_{c}. As we decrease *V*_{g} to −0.1 V, thereby increasing the effective amount of disorder in the 2DES, the relative positions between these two fields remain the same as shown in Figure 7b. Nevertheless, it can be observed that *ρ*_{xy} tends to move closer to *ρ*_{xx} with decreasing *V*_{g}. This may be quantified by defining the ratio *ρ*_{xy}/*ρ*_{xx} at *B*_{c}, whose value is 1.57 and 1.31 for *V*_{g} = −0.05 and −0.1 V, respectively.

The interaction-induced parabolic NMR can be observed at both gate voltages. This result, together with the negligible *T* dependence of the Hall slope as shown in Figure 8a, implies that the ballistic part of the e-e interactions dominates as mentioned above. Therefore, by analyzing the observed parabolic NMR and corresponding Hall conductivity with Equations 4 and 3, respectively, we can obtain the renormalized transport mobilities *μ′* at each measured *T*. Again, the estimated *μ′* obtained by different methods as shown using different symbols in Figure 9 do not coincide with each other. It has already been demonstrated that the background MR can validate the SdH theory at *B* > 1/*μ*_{q} for *V*_{g} = −0.075 V in [27]. However, as shown in Figure 9c for *V*_{g} = −0.1 V, 1/*μ*_{q} ~ 1.67 T is found to be close to the crossing point in *ρ*_{xx} at *B* ~ 1.63 T, which corresponds to the *ν* = 4 to *ν* = 2 QH plateau-plateau transition. Therefore, it is reasonable to attribute the discrepancy of *μ′* obtained by different methods to the background MR. However, we can see that the value of *μ′* is underestimated by using the first method, which is different from that in sample LM4640 with the overestimated result. Our experimental results in conjunction with existing reports [37, 45–48] suggest that a detailed treatment of the background MR is required. Moreover, the role of spin splitting does not seem to be significant in our system [49–51].

The inverse Drude mobilities 1/*μ*_{D} estimated by the same procedures are 0.38, 0.46, 0.53, and 0.63 T for *V*_{g} = 0, −0.05, −0.075, and −0.1 V, respectively. We can see clearly that 1/*μ*_{D} deviates from the crossing of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy} (0.35, 0.43, 0.47, and 0.54 T for the corresponding *V*_{g}) as the applied gate voltage is decreased. The enhancement of background disorder with decreasing *V*_{g} may be the reason for such a discrepancy which can be deduced from the ratio *μ*_{D}/*μ*_{q} (4.27, 3.32, 2.92, and 2.65 for the corresponding *V*_{g}). The underlying physics is that the interference-induced e-e interactions are regained as a sufficient amount of short-range scattering potential is introduced, which leads to increased electron backscattering. Moreover, the parabolic NMR extending well below 1/*μ*_{D}, as shown in Figure 7, provides another evidence for the recovery of e-e interactions since in a 2DES dominated by a long-range scattering potential, it occurs only as *B* > 1/*μ*_{D}. We hope that our results will stimulate further investigations to fully understand the evolution of extended states near *μ*_{D}*B* = 1 in a disordered 2DES both experimentally and theoretically.

## Conclusion

In conclusion, we have studied magnetotransport in gated two-dimensional electron systems. By varying the effective amount of disorder and the carrier density through different applied gate voltages, we observe that the crossing of *ρ*_{xx} and *ρ*_{xy} is governed by the inverse of the Drude mobility 1/*μ*_{D} and can occur for *B* > *B*_{c}, *B* < *B*_{c}, and *B* ~ *B*_{c} where *B*_{c} corresponds to the direct I-QH transition as the influence of e-e interactions is not significant. However, such a criterion breaks down when a sufficient amount of disorder is introduced, which leads to the recovery of interference-induced e-e interactions. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the magneto-oscillations following the semiclassical SdH theory can coexist with quantum localization as a result of the background MR, and the onset of strong localization occurs at a much higher field than either *B*_{c} or 1/*μ*_{D}. Therefore, in order to obtain a thorough understanding of the ground state of a weakly interacting 2DES, it is essential to eliminate the influence of e-e interactions as much as possible.

## References

Lee PA, Ramakrishnan TV: Disordered electronic systems.

*Rev Mod Phys*1985, 57: 287.Song SH, Shahar D, Tsui DC, Xie YH, Monroe D: New universality at the magnetic field driven insulator to integer quantum Hall effect transitions.

*Phys Rev Lett*1997, 78: 2200. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2200Jiang HW, Johnson CE, Wang KL, Hannahs ST: Observation of magnetic-field-induced delocalization: transition from Anderson insulator to quantum Hall conductor.

*Phys Rev Lett*1993, 71: 1439. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1439Hughes RJF, Nicholls JT, Frost JEF, Linfield EH, Pepper M, Ford CJB, Ritchie DA, Jones GAC, Kogan E, Kaveh M: Magnetic-field-induced insulator-quantum Hall-insulator transition in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas.

*J Phys Condens Matter*1994, 6: 4763. 10.1088/0953-8984/6/25/014Lee CH, Chang YH, Suen YW, Lin HH: Magnetic-field-induced insulator-quantum Hall conductor-insulator transitions in doped GaAs/Al

_{x}Ga_{1-x}As quantum wells.*Phys Rev B*1997, 56: 15238. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.15238Smorchkova IP, Samarth N, Kikkawa JM, Awschalom DD: Giant magnetoresistance and quantum phase transitions in strongly localized magnetic two-dimensional electron gases.

*Phys Rev B*1998, 58: R4238. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R4238Huang CF, Chang YH, Lee CH, Chou HT, Yeh HD, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Lin HH, Cheng HH, Hwang GJ: Insulator-quantum Hall conductor transitions at low magnetic field.

*Phys Rev B*2002, 65: 045303.Kim G-H, Liang C-T, Huang CF, Lee MH, Nicholls JT, Ritchie DA: Insulator-quantum Hall transitions in two-dimensional electron gas containing self-assembled InAs dots.

*Physica E*2003, 17: 292.Kim G-H, Liang C-T, Huang CF, Nicholls JT, Ritchie DA, Kim PS, Oh CH, Juang JR, Chang YH: From localization to Landau quantization in a two-dimensional GaAs electron system containing self-assembled InAs quantum dots.

*Phys Rev B*2004, 69: 073311.Huang T-Y, Juang JR, Huang CF, Kim G-H, Huang C-P, Liang C-T, Chang YH, Chen YF, Lee Y, Ritchie DA: On the low-field insulator-quantum Hall conductor transitions.

*Physica E*2004, 22: 240. 10.1016/j.physe.2003.11.258Huang TY, Liang C-T, Kim G-H, Huang CF, Huang CP, Lin JY, Goan HS, Ritchie DA: From insulator to quantum Hall liquid at low magnetic fields.

*Phys Rev B*2008, 78: 113305.Chen KY, Chang YH, Liang C-T, Aoki N, Ochiai Y, Huang CF, Lin L-H, Cheng KA, Cheng HH, Lin HH, Wu JY, Lin S-D: Probing Landau quantization with the presence of insulator–quantum Hall transition in a GaAs two-dimensional electron system.

*J Phys Condens Matter*2008, 20: 295223. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/29/295223Lo ST, Chen KY, Lin TL, Lin LH, Luo DS, Ochiai Y, Aoki N, Wang Y-T, Peng ZF, Lin Y, Chen JC, Lin SD, Huang CF, Liang CT: Probing the onset of strong localization and electron–electron interactions with the presence of a direct insulator–quantum Hall transition.

*Solid State Commun*1902, 2010: 150.Liu DZ, Xie XC, Niu Q: Weak field phase diagram for an integer quantum Hall liquid.

*Phys Rev Lett*1996, 76: 975. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.975Sheng DN, Weng ZY: Phase diagram of the integer quantum Hall effect.

*Phys Rev B*2000, 62: 15363. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.15363Huckestein B: Quantum Hall effect at low magnetic fields.

*Phys Rev Lett*2000, 84: 3141. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3141Hanein Y, Nenadovic N, Shahar D, Shtrikman H, Yoon I, Li CC, Tsui DC: Linking insulator-to-metal transitions at zero and finite magnetic fields.

*Nature*1999, 400: 735. 10.1038/23419Clarke WR, Yasin CE, Hamilton AR, Micolich AP, Simmons MY, Muraki K, Hirayama Y, Pepper M, Ritchie DA: Impact of long- and short-range disorder on the metallic behaviour of two-dimensional systems.

*Nat Phys*2008, 4: 55. 10.1038/nphys757Ilani S, Martin J, Teitelbaum E, Smet JH, Mahalu D, Umansky V, Yacoby A: The microscopic nature of localization in the quantum Hall effect.

*Nature*2004, 427: 328. 10.1038/nature02230Amado M, Diez E, Lopez-Romero D, Rossella F, Caridad JM, Dionigi F, Bellani V, Maude DK: Plateau–insulator transition in graphene.

*New J Phys*2010, 12: 053004. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053004Fowler AB, Fang FF, Howard WE, Stiles PJ: Magneto-oscillatory conductance in silicon surfaces.

*Phys Rev Lett*1966, 16: 901. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.901Ando T: Theory of quantum transport in a two-dimensional electron system under magnetic fields. IV. Oscillatory conductivity.

*J Phys Soc Jpn*1974, 37: 1233. 10.1143/JPSJ.37.1233Coleridge PT, Zawadzki P, Sachrajda AS: Peak values of resistivity in high-mobility quantum-Hall-effect samples.

*Phys Rev B*1994, 49: 10798. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.10798Martin GW, Maslov DL, Reizer MY: Quantum magneto-oscillations in a two-dimensional Fermi liquid.

*Phys Rev B*2003, 68: 241309.Hang DR, Huang CF, Cheng KA: Probing semiclassical magneto-oscillations in the low-field quantum Hall effect.

*Phys Rev B*2009, 80: 085312.Huang TY, Liang C-T, Kim G-H, Huang CF, Huang CP, Ritchie DA: Probing two-dimensional metallic-like and localization effects at low magnetic fields.

*Physica E*2010, 42: 1142. 10.1016/j.physe.2009.11.049Lo S-T, Wang Y-T, Bohra G, Comfort GE, Lin T-Y, Kang M-G, Strasser G, Bird JP, Huang CF, Lin L-H, Chen JC, Liang C-T: Insulator, semiclassical oscillations and quantum Hall liquids at low magnetic fields.

*J Phys Condens Matter*2012, 24: 405601. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/40/405601Gao KH, Yu G, Zhou YM, Wei LM, Lin T, Shang LY, Sun L, Yang R, Zhou WZ, Dai N, Chu JH, Austing DG, Gu Y, Zhang YG: Insulator-quantum Hall conductor transition in high electron density gated InGaAs/InAlAs quantum wells.

*J Appl Phys*2010, 108: 063701. 10.1063/1.3486081Dubi Y, Meir Y, Avishai Y: Quantum Hall criticality, superconductor-insulator transition, and quantum percolation.

*Phys Rev B*2005, 71: 125311.Dubi Y, Meir Y, Avishai Y: Unifying model for several classes of two-dimensional phase transition.

*Phys Rev Lett*2005, 94: 156406.Zala G, Narozhny BN, Aleiner IL: Interaction corrections at intermediate temperatures: longitudinal conductivity and kinetic equation.

*Phys Rev B*2001, 64: 214204.Gornyi IV, Mirlin AD: Interaction-induced magnetoresistance: from the diffusive to the ballistic regime.

*Phys Rev Lett*2003, 90: 076801.Gornyi IV, Mirlin AD: Interaction-induced magnetoresistance in a two-dimensional electron gas.

*Phys Rev B*2004, 69: 045313.Minkov GM, Germanenko AV, Rut OE, Sherstobitov AA, Larionova VA, Bakarov AK, Zvonkov BN: Diffusion and ballistic contributions of the interaction correction to the conductivity of a two-dimensional electron gas.

*Phys Rev B*2006, 74: 045314.Minkov GM, Germanenko AV, Rut OE, Sherstobitov AA, Zvonkov BN: Renormalization of hole-hole interaction at decreasing Drude conductivity: gated GaAs/In

_{x}Ga_{1−x}As/GaAs heterostructures.*Phys Rev B*2007, 76: 165314.Paalanen MA, Tsui DC, Hwang JCM: Parabolic magnetoresistance from the interaction effect in a two-dimensional electron gas.

*Phys Rev Lett*1983, 51: 2226. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2226Li L, Proskuryakov YY, Savchenko AK, Linfield EH, Ritchie DA: Magnetoresistance of a 2D electron gas caused by electron interactions in the transition from the diffusive to the ballistic regime.

*Phys Rev Lett*2003, 90: 076802.Simmons MY, Hamilton AR, Pepper M, Linfield EH, Rose PD, Ritchie DA: Weak localization, hole-hole interactions, and the “metal”-insulator transition in two dimensions.

*Phys Rev Lett*2000, 84: 2489. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2489Hilke M, Shahar D, Song SH, Tsui DC, Xie YH: Phase diagram of the integer quantum Hall effect in p-type germanium.

*Phys Rev B*2000, 62: 6940. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.6940Mirlin AD, Polyakov DG, Evers F, Wölfle P: Quasiclassical negative magnetoresistance of a 2D electron gas: interplay of strong scatterers and smooth disorder.

*Phys Rev Lett*2001, 87: 126805.Renard V, Kvon ZD, Gusev GM, Portal JC: Large positive magnetoresistance in a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas: interplay of short- and long-range disorder.

*Phys Rev B*2004, 70: 033303.Harrang JP, Higgins RJ, Goodall RK, Jay PR, Laviron M, Delescluse P: Quantum and classical mobility determination of the dominant scattering mechanism in the two-dimensional electron gas of an AlGaAs/GaAs heterojunction.

*Phys Rev B*1985, 32: 8126. 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.8126Das Sarma S, Stern F: Single-particle relaxation time versus scattering time in an impure electron gas.

*Phys Rev B*1985, 32: 8442. 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.8442Coleridge PT, Stoner R, Fletcher R: Low-field transport coefficients in GaAs/Ga

_{1-x}Al_{x}As heterostructures.*Phys Rev B*1989, 39: 1120. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1120Gao KH, Zhou WZ, Zhou YM, Yu G, Lin T, Guo SL, Chu JH, Dai N, Gu Y, Zhang YG, Austing DG: Magnetoresistance in high-density two-dimensional electron gas confined in InAlAs/InGaAs quantum well.

*Appl Phys Lett*2009, 94: 152107. 10.1063/1.3119664Hang DR, Liang C-T, Juang JR, Huang T-Y, Hung WK, Chen YF, Kim G-H, Lee J-H, Lee J-H: Electrically detected and microwave-modulated Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in an Al

_{0.4}Ga_{0.6}N/GaN heterostructure.*J Appl Phys*2003, 93: 2055. 10.1063/1.1539286Juang JR, Huang T-Y, Chen T-M, Lin M-G, Lee Y, Liang C-T, Hang DR, Chen YF, Chyi J-I: Transport in a gated Al

_{0.18}Ga_{0.82}N/GaN electron system.*J Appl Phys*2003, 94: 3181. 10.1063/1.1594818Chen JH, Lin JY, Tsai JK, Park H, Kim G-H, Youn D, Cho HI, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Liang C-T, Chen YF: Experimental evidence for Drude-Boltzmann-like transport in a two-dimensional electron gas in an AlGaN/GaN heterostructure.

*J Korean Phys Soc*2006, 48: 1539.Cho KS, Huang T-Y, Huang CP, Chiu YH, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Lo I: Exchange-enhanced g-factors in an Al

_{0.25}Ga_{0.75}N/GaN two-dimensional electron system.*J Appl Phys*2004, 96: 7370. 10.1063/1.1815390Cho KS, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Tang YQ, Shen B: Spin-dependent photocurrent induced by Rashba-type spin splitting in Al

_{0.25}Ga_{0.75}N/GaN heterostructures.*Phys Rev B*2007, 75: 085327.Lin S-K, Wu KT, Huang CP, Liang C-T, Chang YH, Chen YF, Chang PH, Chen NC, Chang C-A, Peng HC, Shih CF, Liu KS, Lin TY: Electron transport in In-rich In

_{x}Ga_{1-x}N films.*J Appl Phys*2005, 97: 046101. 10.1063/1.1847694

## Acknowledgment

This work was funded by National Taiwan University (grant no. 102R7552-2).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

STL and YTW performed the experiments. GS and SDL prepared the devices. YFC and CTL coordinated the project. STL, JPB, and CTL drafted the paper. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

## Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access**
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Lo, ST., Wang, YT., Lin, SD. *et al.* Tunable insulator-quantum Hall transition in a weakly interacting two-dimensional electron system.
*Nanoscale Res Lett* **8, **307 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-307

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-307

### Keywords

- Hall effect
- Magnetoresistance
- Electrons
- Direct insulator-quantum hall transition