Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

3-D solar cells by electrochemical-deposited Se layer as extremely-thin absorber and hole conducting layer on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:8

  • Received: 16 July 2012
  • Accepted: 13 December 2012
  • Published:


A three-dimensional selenium solar cell with the structure of Au/Se/porous TiO2/compact TiO2/fluorine-doped tin oxide-coated glass plates was fabricated by an electrochemical deposition method of selenium, which can work for the extremely thin light absorber and the hole-conducting layer. The effect of experimental conditions, such as HCl and H2SeO3 in an electrochemical solution and TiO2 particle size of porous layers, was optimized. This kind of solar cell did not use any buffer layer between an n-type electrode (porous TiO2) and a p-type absorber layer (selenium). The crystallinity of the selenium after annealing at 200°C for 3 min in the air was significantly improved. The cells with a selenium layer deposited at concentrations of HCl = 11.5 mM and H2SeO3 = 20 mM showed the best performance, resulting in 1- to 2-nm thickness of the Se layer, short-circuit photocurrent density of 8.7 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage of 0.65 V, fill factor of 0.53, and conversion efficiency of 3.0%.


  • 3-D solar cells
  • Nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode
  • Se layer


Three-dimensional (3-D) solar cells were developed by Nanu et al. and O'Hayre et al. [14]. The structure of these solar cells is similar to dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) [58]; however, this kind of 3-D solar cell does not use a liquid electrolyte like DSC. Hence, 3-D solar cells can get better stability than DSCs. The other advantage of 3-D solar cells is a short migration distance of the minority carriers and, therefore, reduces the recombination of electrons and holes [3]. In addition, 3-D solar cells are easily fabricated by non-vacuum methods such as spray pyrolysis and chemical bath depositions; consequently, they are well-known as low cost solar cells. The major photoabsorber materials in the 3-D compound solar cells have been CuInS2[14, 9], CuInSe2[10], Se [11], Sb2S3[1217], CdSe [18, 19], and CdTe [20, 21]. In the 3-D compound solar cells, the buffer layer between the TiO2 and absorber layer was commonly utilized to block charge recombination between electrons in TiO2 and holes in hole-transport materials [14, 9, 10, 1216].

In this paper, we study 3-D solar cells using selenium for the light absorber layer. Selenium is a p-type semiconductor with a band gap of 1.8 and 2 eV for crystal and amorphous states, respectively. Flat selenium solar cells were researched by Nakada in the mid-1980s [22, 23]. The selenium solar cells with a superstrate structure showed the best efficiency of 5.01% under AM 1.5 G illumination. In our work, the selenium layer was prepared by electrochemical deposition (ECD), a non-vacuum method, resulting in the extremely thin absorber (ETA) [1121]. The similarly structured solar cells (3-D selenium ETA solar cells deposited on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes using electrochemical deposition) were also studied by Tennakone et al. [11], which were composed with hole-conducting layer of CuSCN. The Se layer worked just to be a photoabsorber.

In this report, on the other hand, the 3-D Se ETA solar cells worked without a CuSCN layer. We did not use any buffer layers between the n-type electrode porous TiO2 and the selenium photoabsorber layer, or any additional hole-conducting layer. Hence, the Se layer worked bi-functionally as photoabsorber and hole conductor. The effect of the TiO2 particle size, HCl and H2SeO3 concentrations, and annealing temperature on the microstructure and photovoltaic performance was investigated thoroughly.


The structure of the 3-D selenium ETA solar cell was described in Figure 1a. Transparent conducting oxides of fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass plates (TEC-7, Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; t = 2.2 mm) were used as substrates. The 70-nm TiO2 compact layer was prepared at 400°C in air by a spray pyrolysis deposition method. The solution used for depositing the TiO2 compact layer was a mixture of titanium acetylacetonate (TAA) and an ethanol with ethanol/TAA volume ratio of 9:1. The TAA solution was prepared by the slow injection of acetylacetone (purity of 99.5%, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) into titanium tetraisopropoxide (purity of 97%, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.) with a mole ratio of 2:1. After TiO2 compact layer deposition, samples were immersed into a 40 mM aqueous TiCl4 aqueous solution at 70°C for 30 min for the purpose of removing pin holes in TiO2 compact layers and washed with water and ethanol. The porous TiO2 layers with different TiO2 particle sizes were coated by a screen-printing method. The TiO2 particles were ST21 (Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for d = 20 nm, F-2 (Showa Titanium Co., Ltd., Toyama, Japan) for d = 60 nm, F-1 (Showa Titanium Co., Ltd.) for d = 90 nm, and ST41 (Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd., Japan) for d = 200 nm. The thickness of porous TiO2 layers was fixed at 2 μm. The detail about preparing the TiO2 paste and sintering after screen printing was described in the previous report [24]. Selenium absorber layers were deposited for 20 min by the ECD method. The solution for ECD includes 0.45 M NaCl (purity of 99.5%, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.), HCl (concentration of 20 w/w%, Kishida Chemical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and H2SeO3 (purity of 97%, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.); the water was used as solvent. The concentrations of HCl and H2SeO3 were discussed in the ‘Results and discussions’ section. The pulse potential (on-off) was applied during ECD. The pulse potential was described in Figure 1b. Ag/AgCl (BAS Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used as a reference electrode. The total voltage-applying duration and the total off time are 10 min each. Hence, the total deposition duration (including off time) was 20 min. All samples after depositing by ECD were annealed at 200°C for 3 min in the air to improve the crystallinity of selenium layers. After the annealing, the 3-D selenium ETA solar cells were completed with gold electrodes deposited by an evaporation method. The area of cells for the photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) measurement is 0.25 cm2.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The 3-D solar cell structure and the electrochemical deposition. <Au/Se/porous TiO2/compact TiO2/fluorine-doped tin oxide-coated glass plates > (a) and the voltage pulse pattern for the electrochemical deposition of Se (b).

In order to confirm the crystallinity of selenium before and after annealing, X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Mini Flex II, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was carried out. The cross-section and surface morphology of the samples were measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-6510, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The coverage on nanocrystalline TiO2 by Se was observed by high resolutiontransmission electron microscopy (JEM 2100 F, JEOL Ltd.). Absorption spectra were measured by an ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (Lambda 750 UV/VIS spectrometer, PerkinElmer Inc., MA, USA). Photovoltaic measurements employed an AM 1.5 G solar simulator equipped with a xenon lamp (YSS-80, Yamashita Denso Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The power of the simulated light was calibrated to 100 mW cm−2 using a reference Si photodiode (Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). J-V curves were obtained by applying an external bias to the cell and measuring  the  generated  photocurrent  with  a  DC  voltage  current source (6240A, ADCMT Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Results and discussion

In order to improve the crystallinity of the selenium layer, the samples after ECD were annealed at different temperatures. Figure 2 shows the XRD pattern of selenium depositing on porous TiO2/compact TiO2/FTO/glass before and after annealing at various temperatures for 3 min in the air. The XRD peaks of selenium were not observed at an as-deposition sample. This indicates that the selenium layer was in an amorphous state. In the case of the sample annealing at 100°C, a weak peak of selenium was observed at the position of 29.6°; this means that the improvement of the crystallinity in selenium was insignificant. However, when the annealing temperature of Se was increased to 200°C, strong peaks were observed at the positions of 23.5°, 29.7°, and 43.8°, and these peaks were indexed at (100), (101), and (012) of selenium, respectively [25]. The appearance of Se strong peaks at the sample annealing at 200°C indicates a strong improvement of the crystallinity in the selenium absorber layer. The change in the crystallinity of selenium will cause an effect on the optical and microstructural properties, as well as on photovoltaic performance. This topic will be discussed in more detail in the absorption spectra, SEM image, and photocurrent density-voltage results below.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The XRD patterns of porous TiO 2 /compact TiO 2 /FTO with/without Se electrochemical deposition and with/without annealing.

Figure 3 shows the cross-sectional and surface SEM images of porous TiO2, Se-coated porous TiO2 without annealing, and Se-coated porous TiO2 with annealing at 200°C for 3 min in the air. From the cross-sectional images, as shown in Figure 3a,c,e, it is difficult to recognize the changes in the microstructure in the samples before and after depositing selenium, as well as with and without annealing.
Figure 3
Figure 3

SEM images of cross-sections and surface annealings. Cross-section (a) and surface (b) of the porous TiO2/compact TiO2/FTO/glass, the cross-section (c) and surface (d) of Se-coated porous TiO2 before annealing, and the cross-section (e) and surface (f) of Se-coated porous TiO2 after annealing at 200°C for 3 min.

The surface of porous TiO2 is rather rough (see Figure 3b) because the particle size of TiO2 nanoparticles is big, approximately 60 nm. However, the surface became smoother after depositing selenium as shown in Figure 3d. Figure 3f shows the surface morphology of selenium-coated porous TiO2 after annealing at 200°C for 3 min in the air. The surface is rougher than that of before annealing. Big particles were observed in this sample. The appearance of big particles and a rough surface is due to the improvement of the crystallinity of selenium after annealing, as mentioned in the XRD section above.

Figure 4 shows a TEM image of Se-deposited TiO2 nanocrystals after annealing at 200°C, which was observed after receiving a scratching from an FTO glass substrate and deposited on a Cu grid for TEM. It was confirmed that an extremely thin electrodeposited Se layer (t = 1 to 2 nm) existed on TiO2 nanoparticles. Since the Se layer is very thin, it should function in two ways: the photoabsorber and the hole conductor, as illustrated in Figure 1a.
Figure 4
Figure 4

A TEM image of the Se-deposited nanocrystal TiO 2 electrode after annealing at 200°C.

Figure 5 depicts the absorption spectra of Se-coated porous TiO2 without annealing and with annealing at 100°C, 200°C, and 300°C. The band gap of as-deposited Se is 2.0 eV; this is the band gap of amorphous selenium. After annealing, the absorption edges were shifted towards a longer wavelength. The band gaps of the sample annealed at 100°C and 200°C are 1.9 and 1.8 eV, respectively. The fact that the band gap of selenium becomes narrower after annealing may be attributed to the increase in crystallinity as mentioned in the XRD and SEM results. When the annealing temperature was increased up to 300°C, the absorption edge shifted towards a shorter wavelength. The light absorption of 300°C-annealed Se became lower in comparison to selenium with and without annealing at 100°C and 200°C. The decrease in the light absorption of selenium may be due to the fact that a part of selenium escaped from the sample during annealing because the melting point of selenium is quite low, approximate 217°C [23]. From the absorption spectra and XRD results, the sample annealed at 200°C for 3 min in the air was inferred to be the best condition.
Figure 5
Figure 5

The absorption spectra of selenium with/without annealing at various temperatures under air.

In order to optimize the particle size of TiO2 nanoparticles for the porous layer, 3-D selenium ETA cells were fabricated with different TiO2 nanoparticle sizes. Figure 6 shows the photocurrent density-voltage curves and the variation of the conversion efficiency of 3-D selenium ETA cells with various TiO2 particle sizes. The concentrations of HCl and H2SeO3 were kept at 11 and 20 mM, respectively. The cells fabricated with 90 and 200 nm TiO2 particles showed lower photocurrents (JSC = 5.5 and 6.2 mA/cm2 for 200 and 90 nm TiO2, respectively). The best cell was observed in the sample using 60-nm TiO2 nanoparticles for the porous layer. Hence, 60-nm TiO2 nanoparticles are optimal for fabricating the porous layer. The parameters of the best cells are short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) = 8.7 mA/cm2, open-voltage (VOC) = 0.65 V, fill factor (FF) = 0.53, and conversion efficiency (η) = 3.0%. The variation of conversion efficiency is shown in Figure 6b. The efficiency decreased with the increase in the TiO2 particle size over 60 nm. The low performance of solar cells with 20-nm TiO2 nanocrystallites can be explained by small pores, and therefore, it was difficult to deposit Se inside the porous TiO2 layer. In the case of the TiO2 particle size being over 60 nm, the decrease of cell performance may be due to the bad connection between nanocrystalline TiO2 particles; the connection between nanocrystalline TiO2 particles is better with a smaller particle size at the same sintering temperature.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Photocurrent density-voltage curves and variation of conversion efficiency. Photocurrent density-voltage curves of 3-D selenium ETA solar cells (a) and the variation of conversion efficiency (b) with different TiO2 particle sizes used for the porous TiO2 layer. The annotation numbers in Figure 6a suggest the sizes of the nanocrystalline TiO2 particle utilized for the electrodes.

Figure 7 shows the photocurrent density-voltage curves and the variation of the conversion efficiency of 3-D selenium ETA solar cells with HCl concentrations in the solution for depositing selenium. The TiO2 nanoparticle with a 60-nm diameter was utilized for the porous layer, and the concentration of H2SeO3 was kept at 20 mM. From Figure 6a, the photocurrent density increased with the increase in HCl concentration in the range of 2.9 to 11.5 mM and decreased with HCl concentration of over 11.5 mM. The cells deposited at HCl concentrations of 11.5 and 17.3 mM showed a higher VOC than those that were prepared at 2.9 and 8.6 mM HCl. Figure 6b shows the variation of the conversion efficiency with an HCl concentration in the ECD solution. The highest conversion efficiency was obtained at the concentration of 11.5 mM. In the case of samples deposited with the concentrations of 2.9 and 8.6 mM HCl, Se was almost observed at the outer porous TiO2; this is the reason for getting a low cell performance. Conversely, Se distributed uniformly from the bottom to the top of porous TiO2 at an HCl concentration of 11.5 mM. Further addition of HCl (17.3 mM) caused the deposition rate of Se to become rather fast and the porous-TiO2 layer to easily break and fall off from the substrate; this can explain the low cell performance of samples depositing at 17.3 mM HCl.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Photocurrent density-voltage curves and variation of the conversion efficiency of 3-D selenium ETA solar cells. Photocurrent density-voltage curves (a) and the variation of conversion efficiency (b) of 3-D selenium ETA solar cells with different HCl concentrations. The annotation numbers in Figure 7a suggest the HCl concentrations for Se deposition.

In order to investigate the effect of H2SeO3 concentration on the cell performance, cells were prepared at various H2SeO3 concentrations. Figure 8 depicts the photocurrent density-voltage curves with different H2SeO3 concentrations. The HCl concentration in these experiments was kept at 11.5 mM, and 60-nm TiO2 nanoparticles were utilized for the porous layer. From the results, the photovoltaic performance of cells is seemingly better at a lower H2SeO3 concentration. The best cell performance was observed at 20 mM H2SeO3. When the concentration of H2SeO3 was over 20 mM, the deposition rate was rather fast, so the porous TiO2 layers easily broke and peeled off. This may be the reason behind the low cell performance.
Figure 8
Figure 8

Photocurrent density-voltage curves of selenium solar cells with various H 2 SeO 3 concentrations. The annotation numbers in Figure 8 suggest the H2SeO3 concentrations.


3-D selenium ETA solar cells using an extremely thin absorber Se layer on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes were fabricated by electrochemical deposition method. The crystallinity of the selenium layer after annealing at 200°C for 3 min in the air was significantly improved, and the band gap became narrower in comparison to the sample both with and without annealing at 100°C. The photovoltaic performance features of the best 3-D selenium ETA solar cells are JSC = 8.7 mA/cm2, VOC = 0.65 V, FF = 0.53, and η = 3.0%. These results are interesting for PV researchers because the fabrication method for this kind of solar cells is quite simple. However, in order to get a higher efficiency, the photocurrent density should be more improved.



Part of this work was funded by the Innovative Solar Cells Project (NEDO, Japan).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electric Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of Hyogo, Shosha 2167, Himeji, Hyogo 671-2280, Japan
Energy Technology Laboratories, Osaka Gas Co. Ltd, 6-19-9, Torishima, Konohana-Ku, Osaka 554-0051, Japan


  1. Nanu M, Schoonman J, Goossens A: Inorganic nanocomposites of n- and p-type semiconductors: a new type of three-dimensional solar cell. Adv Mater 2004, 16: 453–456. 10.1002/adma.200306194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nanu M, Schoonman J, Goossens A: Solar-energy conversion in TiO2/CuInS2 nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15: 95–100. 10.1002/adfm.200400150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nanu M, Schoonman J, Goossens A: Nanocomposite three-dimensional solar cells obtained by chemical spray deposition. Nano Lett 2005, 5: 1716–1719. 10.1021/nl0509632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. O'Hayre R, Nanu M, Schoonman J, Goossen A: A parametric study of TiO2/CuInS2 nanocomposite solar cells: how cell thickness, buffer layer thickness, and TiO2 particle size affect performance. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 055702. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/5/055702View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Nattestad A, Mozer AJ, Fischer MKR, Cheng YB, Mishra A, Buerle P, Bach U: Highly efficient photocathodes for dye-sensitized tandem solar cells. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 31–35. 10.1038/nmat2588View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yum JH, Baranoff E, Kessler F, Moehl T, Ahmad S, Bessho T, Marchioro A, Ghadiri E, Moser JE, Yi C, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M: A cobalt complex redox shuttle for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit potentials. Nature Commun 2012. 10.1038/ncomms1655Google Scholar
  7. Yella A, Lee HW, Tsao HN, Yi C, Chandiran AK, Nazeeruddin MK, Diau EW, Yeh CY, Zakeeruddin SM, Gräzel M: Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science 2011, 334: 629–634. 10.1126/science.1209688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ito S, Zakeeruddin SM, Comte P, Liska P, Kuang D, Grätzel M: Bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells based on an ionic liquid electrolyte. Nature Photonics 2012, 2: 693–698.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wienke J, Krunks M, Lenzmann F: Inx(OH)ySz as recombination barrier in TiO2/inorganic absorber heterojunction. Semicond Sci Technol 2003, 18: 876–880. 10.1088/0268-1242/18/9/311View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Valdés M, Frontini MA, Vázquez M, Goossens A: Low-cost 3D nanocomposite solar cells obtained by electrodeposition of CuInSe2. Appl Surf Sci 2007, 254: 303–307. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.063View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tennakone K, Kumara GRRA, Kottegoda IRM, Perera VPS, Aponsu GMLP: Nanoporous n-TiO2/selenium/p-CuCNS photovoltaic cell. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1998, 31: 2326–2330. 10.1088/0022-3727/31/18/019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nezu S, Larramona G, Chon C, Jacob A: Light soaking and gas effect on nanocrystalline TiO2/Sb2S3/CuSCN photovoltaic cells following extremely thin absorber concept. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 6854–6859. 10.1021/jp100401eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsujimoto K, Nguyen DC, Ito S, Hishino H, Matsuyoshi H, Konno A, Kumara GRA, Tennakone K: TiO2 surface treatment effects by Mg2+, Ba2+, and Al3+ on Sb2S3 extremely thin absorber solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 13465–13471. 10.1021/jp208937jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang JA, Rhee JH, Im SH, Lee YH, Kim HJ, Seok SI, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M: High-performance nanostructured inorganic heterojunction solar cells. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 2609–2612. 10.1021/nl101322hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Itzhaik Y, Niitsoo O, Page M, Hodes G: Sb2S3-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 4254–4256. 10.1021/jp900302bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Moon SJ, Itzhaik Y, Yum JH, Zakeeruddin SM, Hodes G, Gratzel M: Sb2S3-based mesoscopic solar cell using an organic hole conductor. J Phys Chem Lett 2010, 1: 1524–1527. 10.1021/jz100308qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Im SH, Lim CS, Chang JA, Lee YH, Maiti N, Kim HJ, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M, Seok SI: Toward interaction of sensitizer and functional moieties in hole-transporting materials for efficient semiconductor-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 4789–4793. 10.1021/nl2026184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Clement CL, Zaera RT, Ryan MA, Katty A, Hodes G: CdSe-sensitized p-CuSCN/nanowire n-ZnO heterojunctions. Adv Mater 2005, 17: 1512–1515. 10.1002/adma.200401848View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Niitsoo O, Sarkar SK, Pejoux C, Rühle S, Cahen D, Hodes G: Chemical bath deposited CdS/CdSe-sensitized porous TiO2 solar cell. J Photochem Photobio A 2006, 181: 306–313. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.12.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yena-Zaera R, Katty A, Bastide S, Lévy-Clément C, O'Regan B, Muñoz-Sanjosé V: ZnO/CdTe/CuSCN, a promising heterostructure to act as inorganic eta-solar cell. Thin Solid Films 2005, 483: 372–377. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.01.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ernst K, Engelhardt R, Ellmer K, Kelch C, Muffler HJ, Lux-Steiner MC, Konenkamp R: Contacts to a solar cell with extremely thin CdTe absorber. Thin Solid Films 2001, 387: 26–28. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01731-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakada T, Kunioka A: Efficient ITO/Se heterojunction solar cells. Jpn J Appl Phys 1984, 23: L587-L589. 10.1143/JJAP.23.L587View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakada T, Kunioka A: Polycrystalline thin-film TiO2/Se solar cells. Jpn J Appl Phys 1985, 24: L536-L538. 10.1143/JJAP.24.L536View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ito S, Chen P, Comte P, Nazeeruddin MK, Liska P, Péchy P, Grätzel M: Fabrication of screen-printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye-sensitised solar cells. Prog Photovoltaics 2007, 15: 603–612. 10.1002/pip.768View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards: JDCPS International Center Diffraction Data: Powder Diffraction File. Card no. 86–2246. Newtown Square: JDCPS International Center Diffraction; 1997.Google Scholar


© Nguyen et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.