Skip to main content

Cobalt/copper-decorated carbon nanofibers as novel non-precious electrocatalyst for methanol electrooxidation


In this study, Co/Cu-decorated carbon nanofibers are introduced as novel electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. The introduced nanofibers have been prepared based on graphitization of poly(vinyl alcohol) which has high carbon content compared to many polymer precursors for carbon nanofiber synthesis. Typically, calcination in argon atmosphere of electrospun nanofibers composed of cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, copper acetate monohydrate, and poly(vinyl alcohol) leads to form carbon nanofibers decorated by CoCu nanoparticles. The graphitization of the poly(vinyl alcohol) has been enhanced due to presence of cobalt which acts as effective catalyst. The physicochemical characterization affirmed that the metallic nanoparticles are sheathed by thin crystalline graphite layer. Investigation of the electrocatalytic activity of the introduced nanofibers toward methanol oxidation indicates good performance, as the corresponding onset potential was small compared to many reported materials; 310 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl electrode) and a current density of 12 mA/cm2 was obtained. Moreover, due to the graphite shield, good stability was observed. Overall, the introduced study opens new avenue for cheap and stable transition metals-based nanostructures as non-precious catalysts for fuel cell applications.


The extensive use of fossil fuels is causing environment pollution and global warming problems. Fuel cell is a good technological option for solving energy and pollution problems. Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have been investigated as high-density power sources in automobiles and in microelectronics. The efficiency of fuel cells depends on the catalytic activity of the catalysts. The use of methanol as a fuel is getting popular because it is a liquid which can be easily stored and handled. Methanol is also easier to supply to the public using our current infrastructure. In the DMFCs, methanol is directly oxidized to carbon dioxide and water, providing a new way to store and convey the energy [13]. The successful commercialization is quite dependent on the cost, activity, and durability of the electrocatalysts [3, 4]. At present, almost all pre-commercial low-temperature fuel cells use Pt-based electrocatalysts [58]. Accordingly, the manufacturing cost is relatively high which constrains their wide applications. Moreover, the catalyst poisoning by CO or CHO species is another real problem facing most of the Pt-based electrocatalysts [3, 9, 10]. Compared to the precious metals, transition metals are abundant and very cheap. Among the transition metals, cobalt has a well-known catalytic activity in many chemical reactions. It is also used as a cocatalyst to annihilate the Pt poisoning [11]. Beside cobalt, copper-based materials also show good performance as electrocatalysts [12, 13].

In the DMFCs, methanol is oxidized to carbon dioxide at the anode according to the reaction: CH3OH + H2O = CO2 + 6H+ + 6e. The reaction is considered to be a combination of adsorption and electrochemical reaction on the anode surface [14, 15]. Accordingly, because of the adsorption capacity of carbon, it was exploited to enhance the electrocatalytic activities for many electrodes [1620]. Addition of alloying elements to Cu has been demonstrated to provide increased electrocatalytic activity in comparison to the pure Cu electrode. For example, MnCu alloy shows a much improved electrochemical activity for the oxidation of glucose in alkaline media in comparison to that of the pure Cu electrode [21].

Nanofibers have gained much prominence in the recent years due to the heightened awareness of their potential applications in many fields including textiles, chemical synthesis, medicine, engineering, and defense. Among several methods for nanofiber production, electrospinning is the most widely used technique due to simplicity, high yield, effectiveness and low-cost aspects [2224]. It is noteworthy mentioning that as compared to nanoparticles, the large axial ratio provides the nanofibrous catalysts a distinct advantage especially when utilizing in the electron transfer-based processes [25, 26]. Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) prepared by the electrospinning process gradually attracted the attention of most researchers because of the associated advantages of the synthesizing technique and the obtained product. Moreover, it is easy to control the morphology and pore structure of the obtained nanofibers [27]. Currently, CNFs are widely used in many fields such as hydrogen energy [28, 29], electrochemical capacitors (EDLCs) [30], lithium-ion rechargeable batteries (LIBs) [31], and fuel cells [32].

Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) is a semi-crystalline compound with comparatively high carbon content (ca. 54.5%), and easily splits into hydroxyl groups in the polymer chain which makes it favorable for use as a precursor for the production of the carbonaceous materials; however, low yield is the main constrain. The low decomposition temperature of PVA is the main reason for the low carbonization yield [33]. Therefore, the researchers are focusing on enhancing the thermal stability of PVA. Some strategies were introduced such as dehydration of PVA from 100°C to 290°C under tension in a mixed gas atmosphere [34], preoxidation or subsequent dehydration [35], and using iodine as a stabilizer for PVA to promote dehydrogenative polymerization during the carbonization process [36]. Recently, it was reported that cobalt strongly enhances the graphitization of PVA [22, 37].

Therefore, the main goal of this study is to introduce a new non-precious catalyst with good electrocatalytic activity. Enhancement of the activity will be based on exploiting the influence of synergetic effect of cobalt and copper bimetallic nanoparticles as well as the advantage of the nanofibrous morphology. In this study, Co/Cu-decorated carbon nanofibers are introduced as novel non-precious catalyst for methanol electrooxidation. The introduced nanofibers have been synthesized by calcination of electrospun nanofibers composed of cobalt acetate, copper acetate, and PVA in argon atmosphere at 750°C. The obtained nanofibers revealed good performance as electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation.

Experimental section

Solution containing copper acetate monohydrate (CuAc, 99.9 Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA), cobalt acetate tetrahydrate (CoAc, 98% assay Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan), and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (10 wt.% concentration in water, molecular weight (MW) = 65,000 g/mol; DC Chemical Co, Ltd, Seoul, South Korea) was electrospun at a voltage of 20 kV using a high-voltage DC power supply. Typically, CuAc (25 wt.%) and CoAc (25 wt.% ) aqueous solutions were mixed with PVA solution to form a mixture containing 80 wt.% polymer and Cu/Co mass ratio of 1:4. The final solution was stirred at 50°C for 5 h and then subjected to the electrospinning process at 20 kV. The formed nanofiber mats were initially dried for 24 h at 80°C under vacuum and then calcined at 750°C for 5 h in argon atmosphere with a heating rate of 2.3°C/min.

The surface morphology was studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL JSM-5900; JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and field-emission scanning electron microscope equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis tool (field emission scanning electron microscopy, FESEM; Hitachi S-7400, Japan). Information about the phase and crystallinity was obtained by using Rigaku x-ray diffractometer (XRD; Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα (λ = 1.540 Å) radiation over Bragg angle ranging from 10° to 90°. High-resolution image and selected area electron diffraction patterns were obtained with transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL JEM-2010, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 200 kV equipped with EDX analysis. The Raman spectra were measured using Nanofinder 30 spectrometer (Tokyo Inst. Co., Machida-shi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a He/Ne (λ = 633 nm laser) and the scattering peaks were calibrated with a reference peak from a Si wafer (520 cm-1). Raman spectra were recorded under a microscope with a × 40 objective in range of 0–1,600 cm-1 and 3 mW of power at the sample. The electrochemical measurements were performed in a 1 M KOH solution at room temperature. The measurements were performed on a VersaSTAT 4 (USA) electrochemical analyzer and a conventional three-electrode electrochemical cell. A Pt wire and an Ag/AgCl electrode were used as the auxiliary and reference electrodes, respectively. Glassy carbon electrode was used as working electrode. Preparation of the working electrode was carried out by mixing 2 mg of the functional material, 20 μL of Nafion solution (5 wt.%) and 400 μL of isopropanol. The slurry was sonicated for 30 min at room temperature. An amount of 15 μL from the prepared slurry was poured on the active area of the glassy carbon electrode which was then subjected to drying process at 80°C for 20 min. All potentials were quoted with regard to the Ag/AgCl electrode. High-purity nitrogen gas was used before and during measurements to deaerate the electrolyte in all measurements. Normalization of the current density was achieved based on the surface area of the utilized glassy carbon electrode (0.07 cm2).

Results and discussion

Electrospinning technique involves the use of a high voltage to charge the surface of a polymer solution droplet and thus to induce the ejection of a liquid jet through a spinneret. Due to bending instability, the jet is subsequently stretched by many times to form continuous ultra-thin fibers. Accordingly, many functional nanofibers have been synthesized by using the electrospinning process. It is noteworthy mentioning that inorganic nanofibers can be synthesized by electrospinning of a sol–gel composed of a polymer and a proper metallic precursor. However, the selected metallic precursor should have polycondensation tendency. Polycondensation of the utilized precursor is the main characteristic to get the sol–gel formulation. Typical metallic precursors are metal alkoxides, which undergo hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions to form an integrated network [38]. Some metal salts such as chloride, nitrate, and acetates can be hydrolyzed and polycondensate to form the gel networks. In this study, copper acetate (CuAc) and cobalt acetate (CoAc) were utilized as metallic precursors due to the good condensation character as shown in this equation [39]:

where M is Co or Cu. PVA was chosen for two functions: optimization of the sol–gel viscosity and as a source of carbon due to the positive impact of CoAc on PVA graphitization [22, 37]. Actually, the obtained CoAc/CuAc/PVA electrospun nanofibers have good nanofibrous morphology as shown in Figure 1A. The calcination of the obtained electrospun nanofibers in argon atmosphere did not strongly affect the nanofibrous morphology as shown in Figure 1B. However, there is a distinct change in the nanofibers' surface after calcination; some nanoparticles are observed attaching to the surface of the sintered nanofibers as shown in Figure 1C.

Figure 1
figure 1

SEM and FE SEM images for the electrospun and sintered nanofibers. (A) SEM images for the electrospun nanofibers. (B,C) SEM and FE SEM images of the sintered nanofibers, respectively.

Among the various analytical techniques, XRD received the most confidence to investigate the composition of the crystalline materials. The typical XRD pattern of the calcined powder is presented in Figure 2. Cobalt has more than one crystal structure, the most common ones are face-centered-cubic (FCC) and hexagonal close-packed (HCP) phases. The two phases of cobalt usually coexist at room temperature and are often difficult to be separated from each other. As shown in Figure 2, the strong diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 44.35°, 51.65°, 75.95°, 92.35°, and 97.75° corresponding to (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) crystal planes indicate formation of FCC crystalline cobalt (JCPDS card no 15–0806). Moreover, HCP Co could be also detected as the standard peaks indicating that the formation of this phase can be seen at 41.72°, 44.73°, 47.63°, and 75.95° corresponding to crystal planes of (100), (002), (101), and (110), respectively (JCPDS card no 05–0727). It is noteworthy mentioning that the synthesis of Co nanostructures which is composed of two phases is already reported [40]. The formation of pure cobalt during the calcination of cobalt acetate in an inert atmosphere was explained in details in other studies [37, 41, 42]. Actually, abnormal decomposition of the acetate anion leads to form reducing gases (CO and H2), these gases are responsible about formation of the pure cobalt. Typically, formation of pure cobalt is conducted according to the following equations:

Co CH 3 COO 2 · 4 H 2 O Co OH CH 3 COO + 3 H 2 O + CH 3 COOH
Co OH CH 3 COO 0.5 CoO + 0.5 CoCO 3 + 0.5 H 2 O + 0.5 CH 3 COCH 3
CoCO 3 CoO + CO 2
CoO + CO Co + CO 2
Figure 2
figure 2

XRD results for the obtained nanofibers. The results indicate formation of FCC cobalt (JCPDS 15–0806, Fm3m (225)), HCP cobalt (JCPDS 05–0727, P63/mmc (194)), and copper (JCPDS 04–0836, Fm3m (225)).

Concerning copper acetate, the XRD analysis indicates that this precursor has been decomposed to Cu metal, as the standard peaks of FCC copper can be observed at 2θ values of 43.3°, 50.5°, and 74.1° corresponding to (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes, respectively (JCPDS card no 04–0836). The formation of pristine copper from decomposition of copper acetate hydrate in an inert atmosphere was also proofed; the suggested stoichiometric equations were explained as follow [43]:

Cu CH 3 COO 2 · H 2 O Cu CH 3 COO 2 + H 2 O
2 Cu CH 3 COO 2 2 Cu + 3 CH 3 COOH 2 + CO 2 + H 2 + C

Additionally, a broad peak at 2θ of 26.3° corresponding to an experimental d spacing of 3.37 Å which indicates the presence of graphite-like carbon (d (002), JCPDS card no 41–1487) can be observed in the figure.

Observation about the inner structure of the synthesized nanofibers was done using TEM, high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM), and selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) analysis; Figure 3 reveals the obtained results. Figure 3A shows that the TEM image of the synthesized nanofibers is decorated by crystalline metallic nanoparticles which support the FESEM image (Figure 1C). The HRTEM image in Figure 3B displaying one attached nanoparticles indicates that the attached nanoparticles have good crystallinity; moreover, these nanoparticles are sheathed by thin layer from good crystalline carbon. Interestingly, the SAED pattern of the chosen nanoparticles indicated hexagonal structure which confirms the formation of HCP cobalt and simultaneously supports the XRD results. Metallurgically, cobalt and copper can form solid solution alloys with a wide composition range. Therefore, TEM EDX analysis (Figure 4) was performed to understand the composition of the formed nanoparticles. As shown in the main image, the metallic nanoparticles have different sizes and also possess good crystallinity. Line EDX analysis was performed at a randomly selected line. As shown in concentration profiles, Co, Cu, and C were detected along with the line. Moreover, along the selected line, one can claim that there are pristine Co and Co/Cu alloy nanoparticles. It is noteworthy mentioning that the observed bare metallic nanoparticles in Figure 4 are sheathed in a carbon shell; however, due to the black and white image mode as well as the low carbon crystallinity, the carbon shell could not be observed. Aside from the normal TEM image (Figure 3) which explains that the metallic nanoparticles are covered by a thin layer of carbon, the performed line TEM EDX supports also this finding. As shown in Figure 4, carbon was detected beyond the distribution range of Co and Cu which was marked by two vertical dashed lines. In other words, this analysis indicates that carbon has a wide distribution compared to the metallic counterpart, and this confirms that the synthesized nanofibers are preserved against the chemicals by a shield of graphite layer.

Figure 3
figure 3

TEM, HRTEM and SAED images of HCP Co NPs.

Figure 4
figure 4

Line TEM EDX analysis of the produced nanofibers and the Co, Cu, and C distribution.

Figure 5 shows the typical Raman spectra of the synthesized nanofibers. As shown in this figure, there is a clear peak at 1,335 cm-1, and this peak is called D peak which is present in all graphite-like carbons and originates from structural defects. The G peak corresponding to planar vibrations of carbon atoms in the graphite-like materials can be observed at 1,590 cm-1. The G peak is associated with the E2g mode (stretching vibrations) in the basal-plane of graphite [44]. Another peak was detected at 195 cm-1, and this peak might be assigned as radial breathing mode (RBM). RBM corresponds to radial expansion-contraction of the carbon; its frequency νRBM depends on the diameter. Typical RBM range is 100 to 350 cm-1[45]. The other apparent peaks might be due to metallic counterpart, since these modes were not reported with graphite-like materials.

Figure 5
figure 5

Raman shift for the obtained nanofibers.

In contrast to the precious metals (especially Pt), usually the zero valent surface of the transition metals is not responsible on the electrocatalytic activity. For instance, in case of the nickel, NiOOH compound has to be synthesized on the surface to initiate the electrochemical activity [46]. The cyclic voltammetric behavior of cobalt and copper nanoparticles and the introduced nanofiber electrodes in 1.0 M KOH solution are shown in Figure 6. The utilized nanoparticles in this study were commercial products: cobalt nanoparticles <50 nm (Sigma Aldrich) and copper nanoparticles < 25 nm (nanoComposix, San Diego, CA, USA). Polarization was started by a potential scanning at a scan rate of 100 mV/s from 800 to 0 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) in the cathodic direction, and then the scan was reversed in the anodic direction back to 800 mV. Analogous to nickel [46], the appeared peaks in the voltammogram of the pristine copper nanoparticles can be considered as an activation of the anode surface to form the active CuOOH layer as follow [46]:

Cu + 2 OH - Cu OH 2 + 2 e
Cu OH 2 + OH - CuOOH + H 2 O + e
Figure 6
figure 6

Cyclic voltammograms of electrocatalyst, pristine cobalt, and copper nanoparticles. Procedure was carried out in 1 M KOH for 50 cycles at a scan rate of 100 mV/s.

Increasing the number of potential sweeps results in a progressive increase of the current density values of the cathodic peak because of the entry of OH into the Cu(OH)2 surface layer, which leads to the progressive formation of a thicker CuOOH layer corresponding to the Cu(OH)2/CuOOH transition [46]. On the other hand, it can be concluded from Figure 6 that Co has no surface activation which explains the known low electrocatalytic activity of this metal. It is noteworthy mentioning that high cobalt percentage was utilized in preparation of the introduced nanofibers to exploit the activity of Co in PVA graphitization to produce CNFs. Recently, supporting of the electrocatalysts on carbonaceous materials is carrying on to take the advantage of the adsorption capacity of the carbon and increase the active catalyst surface area [10, 47]. The bottom panel in Figure 6 displays the obtained results in case of utilizing the introduced nanofibers. As shown in the figure, the presence of carbon and the nanofibrous morphology strongly enhance the current density compared to the pristine cobalt and copper nanoparticles.

Figure 7 displays the cyclic voltammetry for the introduced nanofibers and Co and Cu nanoparticles in presence of 2 M methanol solution. For comparison, nickel nanoparticles (<100 nm, Sigma Aldrich) have been also investigated due to the known electrocatalytic activity of nickel toward methanol electrooxidation. As shown in the figure, the introduced nanofibers have a significant performance compared to the metallic nanoparticles. The obtained good performance can be attributed to one or more from the following reasons: (a) influence of the nanofibrous morphology which, compared to nanoparticles, reveals better catalytic activity with the electron transfer-based reactions [25], (b) presence of carbon, (c) enhancement of the copper electrocatalytic activity due to alloying with Co, and (d) result of pre-adsorption of methanol molecules at Co sites by interaction of non-bonded electron pairs of the O atom of methanol with the partially vacant d orbital of the Co [48]. Moreover, the detected HCP cobalt, which according to our best knowledge was not investigated before as an electrocatalyst, may have an important contribution in the obtained good electrocatalytic activity.

Figure 7
figure 7

Cyclic voltammograms of Co-Cu-C nanofibers, and Co, Ni, and Cu nanoparticles. Amount of 2 M of methanol (scan rate 50 mV/s) was used.

Figure 8A shows the influence of methanol addition on the obtained current density. As shown in the figure, the increase of methanol leads to the increase of the current densities, which indicates methanol oxidation on the surface of the introduced nanofibers. Another finding that can be observed is the optimum methanol concentration of 2 M which is consistent with many reported electrocatalysts. The onset potential is an important indicator among the invoked parameters to demonstrate the electrocatalytic activity. The onset potential indicates the electrode overpotential. In other words, the onset potential can be utilized to evaluate the efficacy of the electrocatalyst. In alcohol electrooxidation, more negative onset potential indicates high activity and less overpotential. As shown in the obtained results for the introduced electrocatalyst (Figure 8B), the corresponding onset potential of the introduced nanofibers is ~310 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl, i.e. ~510 mV vs. normal hydrogen electrode, NHE), and the obtained value is comparatively low compared to many reported materials [49]. This finding further supports the electrocatalytic performance of the introduced nanofibers. The decrease of the corresponding onset potential of the introduced nanofibers might be due to the influence of Co NPs which have been found as excellent CO-tolerant materials [11], and/or non-formation of CO as the corresponding oxidation peak is not observed at ~550 mV (vs. NHE i.e., 350 mV vs. Ag/AgCl).

Figure 8
figure 8

Study the influence methanol concentration on the current density (A) and onset potential (B). Scan rate of 50 mV/s at 25°C.

The introduced Co/Cu electrocatalyst is novel, so the electrooxidation of the methanol can be explained based on previous literature [49, 50] as follow:

  1. 1.

    Adsorption of the methanol on the introduced catalyst (M) and partial release of the protons

    CH 3 OH + M MCH 2 OH + H + + e
  2. 2.

    Further release of the protons

    MCH 2 OH + M M 2 CHOH + H + + e
    M 2 CHOH + M M 3 COH + H + + e
  3. 3.

    In the normal routes, the M3COH compound decomposes to produce MCO and proton as follows [50, 51]:

    M 3 COH MCO + 2 M + H + + e
  4. 4.

    Later on, CO is oxidized by the OH group [50]; however, as aforementioned, CO oxidation on the surface of the introduced catalyst is not detected, so it is believed that reaction 13 does not occur. Instead, this reaction is taking place

    M 2 COH + H 2 O 3 M + CO 2 + 3 H + + 3 e

Constant voltage tests were done at applied potential of 0.4 V in Figure 9. As shown in the figure, there is a sharp initial current drop, followed by a very slow decay. It is noteworthy mentioning that only one working electrode has been used in all the electrochemical analysis. The multiple use of the electrode did not affect the performance, which supports the good stability of the introduced catalyst. The obtained good stability might be explained by the thin graphite layer enveloping the introduced nanofibers.

Figure 9
figure 9

Constant voltage tests at a cell potential of 0.4 V and 2.0 M methanol.

The effect of scan rate on the behavior of methanol oxidation at the introduced electrocatalyst was investigated (Figure 10). The study of the scan rate is helpful to investigate the rate-controlling step. For instance, the linear variation of the current densities with respect to the scan rate indicates that the process of electrooxidation of methanol has the characteristics of a diffusion-controlled process [52]. As shown in Figure 10, the scan rate has almost no influence on the current density, which indicates that the rate-controlling step is another process rather than the diffusion which might be investigated in a future study.

Figure 10
figure 10

Linear sweep curves of methanol oxidation at different scan rates in 2.0 M methanol.


The electrospinning process can be efficiently utilized to produce carbon nanofibers decorated by metallic nanoparticles. Cobalt/copper-decorated carbon nanofibers can be produced by electrospinning of a sol–gel composed of cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, copper acetate monohydrate and poly(vinyl alcohol). Calcination of the electrospun mats in argon atmosphere produces Co/Cu-decorated CNFs. The produced decorated nanofibers can be utilized as electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation; the corresponding onset potential and current density are satisfactory. Moreover, good stability is expected because the metallic nanoparticles are sheathed inside the thin graphite layer. Overall, this study introduces new methodology to produce metal-decorated CNFs based on PVA. The proposed decorated nanofibers can be further modified to be more efficient non-precious electrocatalysts for fuel cell applications.


  1. Guo YG, Hu JS, Wan LJ: Nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. Adv Mater 2008, 20(15):2878–2887. 10.1002/adma.200800627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tian ZQ, Jiang SP, Liang YM, Shen PK: Synthesis and characterization of platinum catalysts on multiwalled carbon nanotubes by intermittent microwave irradiation for fuel cell applications. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110(11):5343–5350. 10.1021/jp056401o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen J, Hu Y, Li C, Qin C, Ye M: Pt–Co supported on single-walled carbon nanotubes as an anode catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 2008, 53(24):7276–7280. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shao Y, Sui J, Yin G, Gao Y: Nitrogen-doped carbon nanostructures and their composites as catalytic materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Appl Catal B 2008, 79(1):89–99. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren X, Zelenay P, Thomas S, Davey J, Gottesfeld S: Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory. J Power Sources 2000, 86(1):111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Z, Ling XY, Su X, Lee JY: Carbon-supported Pt and PtRu nanoparticles as catalysts for a direct methanol fuel cell. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108(24):8234–8240. 10.1021/jp049422b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mu Y, Liang H, Hu J, Jiang L, Wan L: Controllable Pt nanoparticle deposition on carbon nanotubes as an anode catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109(47):22212–22216. 10.1021/jp0555448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, Zhou W, Li H, Zhou Z, Zhou B, Sun G, Xin Q: Nano-stuctured Pt–Fe/C as cathode catalyst in direct methanol fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 2004, 49(7):1045–1055. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yen CH, Shimizu K, Lin YY, Bailey F, Cheng IF, Wai CM: Chemical fluid deposition of Pt-based bimetallic nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for direct methanol fuel cell application. Energy & fuels 2007, 21(4):2268–2271. 10.1021/ef0606409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frackowiak E, Lota G, Cacciaguerra T, Béguin F: Carbon nanotubes with Pt–Ru catalyst for methanol fuel cell. Electrochem Commun 2006, 8(1):129–132. 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulus U, Wokaun A, Scherer G, Schmidt T, Stamenkovic V, Radmilovic V, Markovic N, Ross P: Oxygen reduction on carbon-supported Pt-Ni and Pt-Co alloy catalysts. J Phys Chem B 2002, 106(16):4181–4191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papavasiliou J, Avgouropoulos G, Ioannides T: CuMnOx catalysts for internal reforming methanol fuel cells: application aspects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37(21):16739–16747. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorte RJ, Park S, Vohs JM, Wang C: Anodes for direct oxidation of dry hydrocarbons in a solid‒oxide fuel cell. Adv Mater 2000, 12(19):1465–1469. 10.1002/1521-4095(200010)12:19<1465::AID-ADMA1465>3.0.CO;2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hampson N, Willars M, McNicol B: The methanol-air fuel cell: a selective review of methanol oxidation mechanisms at platinum electrodes in acid electrolytes. J Power Sources 1979, 4(3):191–201. 10.1016/0378-7753(79)85010-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gasteiger HA, Markovic N, Ross PN Jr, Cairns EJ: Methanol electrooxidation on well-characterized platinum-ruthenium bulk alloys. J Phys Chem 1993, 97(46):12020–12029. 10.1021/j100148a030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C, Waje M, Wang X, Tang JM, Haddon RC, Yan Y: Proton exchange membrane fuel cells with carbon nanotube based electrodes. Nano Lett 2004, 4(2):345–348. 10.1021/nl034952p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li W, Liang C, Qiu J, Zhou W, Han H, Wei Z, Sun G, Xin Q: Carbon nanotubes as support for cathode catalyst of a direct methanol fuel cell. Carbon 2002, 40(5):787–790. 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00136-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li W, Liang C, Zhou W, Qiu J, Zhou Z, Sun G, Xin Q: Preparation and characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-supported platinum for cathode catalysts of direct methanol fuel cells. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107(26):6292–6299. 10.1021/jp022505c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steigerwalt ES, Deluga GA, Cliffel DE, Lukehart C: A Pt-Ru/graphitic carbon nanofiber nanocomposite exhibiting high relative performance as a direct-methanol fuel cell anode catalyst. J Phys Chem B 2001, 105(34):8097–8101. 10.1021/jp011633i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu Y, Reddy RG: Electrocatalytic properties of carbon supported cobalt phthalocyanine–platinum for methanol electro-oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33(14):3930–3937. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S-i M, Johnson DC: Electrocatalytic response of carbohydrates at copper-alloy electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 2001, 500(1):524–532.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barakat NA, Khalil KA, Kim HY: Toward facile synthesizing of diamond nanostructures via nanotechnological approach: Lonsdaleite carbon nanofibers by electrospinning. Mater Res Bull 2012, 47(9):2140–2147. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barakat NAM, Abadir MF, Shaheer Akhtar M, El-Newehy M, Y-s S, Yong Kim H: Synthesis and characterization of Pd-doped Co nanofibers as a multifunctional nanostructure. Mater Lett 2012, 85: 120–123. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.099 doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheikh FA, Macossay J, Kanjwal MA, Abdal-hay A, Tantry MA, Kim H: Titanium dioxide nanofibers and microparticles containing nickel nanoparticles. ISRN Nanomaterials 2012, 2012(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barakat NA, Kanjawal MA, Chronakis IS, Kim HY: Influence of temperature on the photodegrdation process using Ag-doped TiO2 nanostructures: negative impact with the nanofibers. J Mol Catal A Chem 2012, 336(1):333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barakat NA, Abdelkareem MA, El-Newehy M, Kim HY: Influence of the nanofibrous morphology on the catalytic activity of NiO nanostructures: an effective impact toward methanol electrooxidation. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8(1):1–6. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inagaki M, Yang Y, Kang F: Carbon nanofibers prepared via electrospinning. Adv Mater 2012, 24(19):2547–2566. doi:10.1002/adma.201104940 doi:10.1002/adma.201104940 10.1002/adma.201104940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yousef A, Barakat NM, Amna T, Abdelkareem M, Unnithan A, Al-Deyab S, Kim H: Activated carbon/silver-doped polyurethane electrospun nanofibers: single mat for different pollutants treatment. Macromol Res 2012, 20(12):1243–1248. 10.1007/s13233-012-0183-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barakat NAM, Shaheer Akhtar M, Yousef A, El-Newehy M, Kim HY: Pd-Co-doped carbon nanofibers with photoactivity as effective counter electrodes for DSSCs. Chem Eng J 2012, 211–212(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.040 doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tao X, Zhang X, Zhang L, Cheng J, Liu F, Luo J, Luo Z, Geise HJ: Synthesis of multi-branched porous carbon nanofibers and their application in electrochemical double-layer capacitors. Carbon 2006, 44(8):1425–1428. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu T, Gu S, Zhang Y, Ren J: Fabrication and characterization of carbon nanofibers with a multiple tubular porous structure via electrospinning. J Polym Res 2012, 19(6):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsuji M, Kubokawa M, Yano R, Miyamae N, Tsuji T, Jun MS, Hong S, Lim S, Yoon SH, Mochida I: Fast preparation of PtRu catalysts supported on carbon nanofibers by the microwave-polyol method and their application to fuel cells. Langmuir 2007, 23(2):387–390. 10.1021/la062223u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fatema UK, Jalal Uddin A, Uemura K, Gotoh Y: Fabrication of carbon fibers from electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers. Text Res J 2011, 81: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bin Y, Chen Q, Nakamura Y, Tsuda K, Matsuo M: Preparation and characterization of carbon films prepared from poly (vinyl alcohol) containing metal oxide and nano fibers with iodine pretreatment. Carbon 2007, 45(6):1330–1339. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang S-J, Yu H-Q, Feng H-M: PVA-based activated carbon fibers with lotus root-like axially porous structure. Carbon 2006, 44(10):2059–2068. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fatema UK, Uddin AJ, Uemura K, Gotoh Y: Fabrication of carbon fibers from electrospun poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibers. Text Res J 2011, 81(7):659–672. 10.1177/0040517510385175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Barakat NAM, Kim B, Park SJ, Jo Y, Jung M-H, Kim HY: Cobalt nanofibers encapsulated in a graphite shell by an electrospinning process. J Mater Chem 2009, 19(39):7371–7378. 10.1039/b904669k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barakat NAM, Hamza A, Al-Deyab SS, Qurashi A, Kim HY: Titanium-based polymeric electrospun nanofiber mats as a novel organic semiconductor. Mater Sci Eng B 2011, 177(1):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yousef A, Barakat NAM, Amna T, Unnithan AR, Al-Deyab SS, Yong Kim H: Influence of CdO-doping on the photoluminescence properties of ZnO nanofibers: effective visible light photocatalyst for waste water treatment. J Lumin 2012, 132(7):1668–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.02.031 doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.02.031 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gubin SP, Spichkin YI, Koksharov YA, Yurkov GY, Kozinkin AV, Nedoseikina TI, Korobov MS, Tishin AM: Magnetic and structural properties of Co nanoparticles in a polymeric matrix. J Magn Magn Mater 2003, 265(2):234–242. doi:–8853(03)00271–3 doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(03)00271-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Barakat NAM, Abadir MF, Nam KT, Hamza AM, Al-Deyab SS, W-i B, Kim HY: Synthesis and film formation of iron-cobalt nanofibers encapsulated in graphite shell: magnetic, electric and optical properties study. J Mater Chem 2011, 21(29):10957–10964. 10.1039/c1jm00052g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wanjun T, Donghua C: Mechanism of thermal decomposition of cobalt acetate tetrahydrate. Chem Pap 2007, 61(4):329–332. doi:10.2478/s11696–007–0042–3 doi:10.2478/s11696-007-0042-3 10.2478/s11696-007-0042-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Afzal M, Butt P, Ahmad H: Kinetics of thermal decomposition of metal acetates. J Therm Anal Calorim 1991, 37(5):1015–1023. 10.1007/BF01932799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Flahaut E, Agnoli F, Sloan J, O’Connor C, Green M: CCVD synthesis and characterization of cobalt-encapsulated nanoparticles. Chem Mater 2002, 14(6):2553–2558. 10.1021/cm011287h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fantini C, Jorio A, Souza M, Strano M, Dresselhaus M, Pimenta M: Optical transition energies for carbon nanotubes from resonant Raman spectroscopy: environment and temperature effects. Phys Rev Lett 2004, 93(14):147406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahim A, Abdel Hameed R, Khalil M: Nickel as a catalyst for the electro-oxidation of methanol in alkaline medium. J Power Sources 2004, 134(2):160–169. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo J, Sun G, Wang Q, Wang G, Zhou Z, Tang S, Jiang L, Zhou B, Xin Q: Carbon nanofibers supported Pt–Ru electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells. Carbon 2006, 44(1):152–157. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Danaee I, Jafarian M, Mirzapoor A, Gobal F, Mahjani M: Electrooxidation of methanol on NiMn alloy modified graphite electrode. Electrochim Acta 2010, 55(6):2093–2100. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Barakat NA, Abdelkareem MA, Yousef A, Al-Deyab SS, El-Newehy M, Kim HY: Cadmium-doped cobalt/carbon nanoparticles as novel nonprecious electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38(1):183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hamnett A: Mechanism and electrocatalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell. Catal Today 1997, 38(4):445–457. 10.1016/S0920-5861(97)00054-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Campbell C, Ertl G, Kuipers H, Segner J: A molecular beam study of the adsorption and desorption of oxygen from a Pt (111) surface. Surf Sci 1981, 107(1):220–236. 10.1016/0039-6028(81)90622-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Khan A, Ahmed R, Mirza ML: Evaluation of catalytic activity of Pt and Pt-Ru catalysts for electro-oxidation of methanol in acid medium by cyclic voltammetry. Port Electrochim Acta 2009, 27(4):429–441. 10.4152/pea.200904429

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by NPST program by King Saud University project number 11-ENE1721-02. We thank Mr. T. S. Bae and Mr. J. C. Lim from KBSI, Jeonju Branch and Mr. Jong-Gyun Kang from Centre for University Research Facility, for taking high-quality FESEM and TEM images, respectively.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasser AM Barakat.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NAB fabricated the introduced nanofibers, carried out the characterization techniques, and the electrochemical measurements, and wrote the paper. MHE helped in writing the paper and performing the characterization process. SSE helped in the paper writing and electrochemical measurements. HYK helped in the nanofibers synthesis and electrochemical measurements. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barakat, N.A., El-Newehy, M., Al-Deyab, S.S. et al. Cobalt/copper-decorated carbon nanofibers as novel non-precious electrocatalyst for methanol electrooxidation. Nanoscale Res Lett 9, 2 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Non-precious catalyst
  • Electrospinning
  • Fuel cells
  • Decorated carbon nanofibers
  • Methanol electrooxidation