Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Intensify the application of ZnO-based nanodevices in humid environment: O2/H2 plasma suppressed the spontaneous reaction of amorphous ZnO nanowires

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:281

Received: 7 April 2014

Accepted: 17 May 2014

Published: 2 June 2014


In this work, we have demonstrated that amorphous ZnO nanobranches (a-ZnO NBs) could spontaneously react from the crystalline ZnO NWs (c-ZnO NWs) at specific humid environment. The spontaneous reaction mechanism and result can be analyzed by humidity controlling and optical microscope (OM)/scanning electron microscope (SEM)/Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM)/transmission electron microscopy (TEM) system. We can make the c-ZnO NWs spontaneous reaction happen at different humid environments and suppress the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous reaction by oxygen/hydrogen plasma surface passivation. The hydrogen plasma surface treatment also can improve the UV sensing sensitivity more than twofold. This work provides the mechanism and methods of the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous growth and offers the passivation treatment for strengthening and enhancing ZnO-based nanodevice application in humid environment and UV light detection, respectively.


  • Spontaneous reaction
  • Humidity reaction
  • a-ZnO
  • Plasma passivation

As one of the most important materials, ZnO has been extensively applied in numerous purposes which include optics, energy [1, 2], piezo-phototronics [36], Schottky contact nanosensors [79], biomedical sciences [10, 11], and spintronics [12]. Due to diverse and abundant nanostructures and a great potential in nanotechnology, a great number of novel ZnO nanodevices such as piezoelectric power generators [1316], field-effect transistors (FET) [17, 18], ultraviolet photodetectors [19], Schottky diodes [6, 2022], switches [21], and flexible piezotronic strain sensors [23] are gradually under research. Those devices, moreover, are expected to operate in various environments; therefore, maintaining their great performance and stability for an extended period of time is required. Due to this reason, nanostructures of ZnO in different atmospheres have become an interesting topic to study. According to several research articles, amorphous ZnCO3 thin films and nanowires could be formed due to the defacing of ZnO nanostructures by moisture and the small amount of CO2 in the atmosphere [24, 25]. In this work, we would figure out the mechanisms of the spontaneous reaction and prove the efficacy of c-ZnO NWs surface passivation that would suppress the spontaneous reaction.


Crystalline ZnO NWs were prepared with the common procedures presented in a previous research article [26]. Briefly, a proper amount of ZnO powders, treated as the precursor and loaded on an alumina boat, were placed at the center of an alumina tube which was set in a furnace to serve as the reaction chamber. A furnace was heated to 1,475°C and held at that temperature for 4.5 h and the gas, Argon, flowed through an alumina tube at a flow rate of 50 sccm to carry ZnO vapors to the end of an alumina tube for NWs growing. Then, the tube was cooled down to room temperature under a continuous argon flow. Crystalline-ZnO NWs were placed on the substrates (cleaned by standard processes) by homemade nanomanipulator. After that, the different samples were loaded into the various humidity conditions waiting for periodically observation. The samples were analyzed and measured by Zeiss SIGMA FESEM (Oberkochen, Germany)/Veeco Dimension 3100 SPM/JEM-2100 F FETEM (Plainview, NY, USA), and Agilent B1500A (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Results and discussion

The spontaneous reaction of a-ZnO nanobranches (NBs) could be observed by optical microscopy (OM); the morphology of a-ZnO NBs was varied with time and humidity (70% ± 2.5%, 80% ± 2.5%, and 90% ± 2.5%), as shown in Figure 1, which implied that the reliable performance of ZnO nanodevices might be deteriorated or even broken down by absorbing abundant H2O molecules. In high humidity (90% ± 2.5%), there are some ZnO particles that could be seen around the ZnO NWs, as illustrated in Figure 1a,b,c. In low humidity (70% ± 2.5%), a great number of thin and needle-like a-ZnO NBs formed from the c-ZnO NWs; the length and direction of the a-ZnO NBs were varied and random as shown in Figure 1g,h,i. Furthermore, when the value of humidity is around 80%, some flawed spots would become nucleate points; most a-ZnO NBs were grown from those nucleate points. Compare these three conditions; the a-ZnO NBs could be grown much faster and thicker in humidity 80% ± 2.5% (within 12 h) than in humidity 70% ± 2.5% (almost 10 days). So the percentage of humidity will be an important parameter for the morphology of spontaneous reaction.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The spontaneous reaction of ZnO nanobranches (NBs) can be observed by optical microscope (OM). The morphology of ZnO NBs is varied with time and humidity (70% ± 2.5%, 80% ± 2.5%, and 90% ± 2.5%). (a, b, c) In high humidity (90% ± 2.5%), plenty of ZnO particles can be found around the ZnO NWs about 12 h. (d, e, f) When the humidity is around 80% ± 2.5%, a few ZnO NBs can be found within 12 h. (g, h, i) In low humidity (70% ± 2.5%), there are no ZnO NBs can be formed until 240 h.

The reaction mechanism of a-ZnO NBs can be studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis as illustrated in Figure 2a,b. The H2O molecules (light blue bubbles) would be absorbed at the surface of c-ZnO NWs (the dark green rod) because the c-ZnO NWs are placed in the humid environment, as shown in the inset of Figure 2a. When the concentration of the H2O molecules was reaching certain level, the moisture would dissolve the specific spots of the c-ZnO NWs surface. Due to the interaction between the surface of c-ZnO NWs and moisture solution, the radial concentration of Zn2+ ion would be changed because Zn2+ ions gradually dissolve and diffuse from the original c-ZnO NWs surface into the moisture solution. When the concentration of Zn2+ ion in moisture solution meets the saturation condition, the Zn2+ ions start to segregate out from the moisture solution; the a-ZnO NBs cause to grow from the main body of the original c-ZnO NWs, which can be seen in Figure 2b. If the dimension of the original c-ZnO NWs is sufficient, the dissolving and diffusing effects can be maintained for a long period; the a-ZnO NBs will keep growing and forming ultra-long a-ZnO NBs. Normally, a-ZnO NBs would be spontaneously grown from specific size of c-ZnO NWs, such as around hundreds of nanometers. In high humidity, however, it is difficult for a-ZnO NBs to segregate from the moisture solution, which means that the Zn2+ ion concentration in moisture solution is not high enough to meet the condition of saturation forming a-ZnO NBs. That is why the ultra-long a-ZnO NBs cannot be seen in high humidity (90% ± 2.5%).
Figure 2
Figure 2

The spontaneous reaction mechanism of a-ZnO NBs is illustrated. (a) A uniform c-ZnO NWs (dark green rod) placed in the moisture environment surrounded by H2O molecules (light blue bubbles). The c-ZnO NW has uniform ZnO concentration which can be seen from the inset (ZnO concentration versus radius). (b) After H2O molecules absorbed at the surface of c-ZnO NWs, the Zn2+ ions would be dissolved from the surface of c-ZnO NWs and became aqueous solution diffused away from the c-ZnO NWs. When the Zn2+ ions and the ZnO NBs start to segregate out from the moisture solution and cause to grow from the main body of the original ZnO NWs, respectively (inset). (c, d) The surface potential was measured before and after moisture treatment.

Zn O s + H 2 O l Zn OH 2 s
Zn OH 2 s + H 2 O l Zn OH 3 aq + H +
Zn OH 2 s + 2 H 2 O l Zn OH 4 aq 2 + 2 H +
The main reactions can be understood by the previous equations [2729]; there are several reactive intermediates like Zn(OH)42−, Zn(OH)2, or Zn(OH)3, which depend on the specific parameters such as the concentration of Zn2+ ion, the amount of H2O molecules, and the pH value. Further investigation, the spontaneous growth mechanism of a-ZnO NBs can be studied through the c-ZnO NWs surface potential measurement by using Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) tapping mode. The surface potential of c-ZnO NWs can be changed due to the humidity absorption. Before humidity treatment, the surface morphology and potential were smooth and almost constant (around 10 to 25 mV variation) by SEM and KPFM analysis, respectively (Figure 2c). After humidity treatment, the surface morphology and potential were rough and varied (around 198.26 mV variation), respectively (Figure 2d). This surface potential variation might induce the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous growth.The spontaneous growth of a-ZnO NBs can be studied by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) system, as illustrated in Figure 3. The a-ZnO NBs can be confirmed as an amorphous structure; the a-ZnO NBs will become new growth areas to keep extending the length of the a-ZnO NBs or growing extra a-ZnO NBs, as illustrated in Figure 3a, and there are amorphous layers around the c-ZnO NW near the roots of a-ZnO NBs, as shown in Figure 3b. The c-ZnO NW exhibit good crystalline feature with the growth along [001] direction, as shown in Figure 3c. The surface caves can be found on the c-ZnO NWs surface, and those caves might be the humidity influence; the dissolution direction is along [010], as shown in Figure 3d.
Figure 3
Figure 3

The spontaneous growth of a-ZnO NBs. (a) The a-ZnO NBs became new growth areas; amorphous nanostructures are around the a-ZnO NBs. (b) There are also amorphous layers on the c-ZnO NW near the roots of a-ZnO NBs. (c) ZnO NWs exhibit a single crystalline feature with the growth along [001] direction. (d) There are surface caves can be found on the c-ZnO NW due to the humidity influence; the dissolution direction is along [010].

For general condition, the spontaneous reaction is loath to reveal in the ZnO NWs application; therefore, we have suppressed the spontaneous reaction from our c-ZnO NWs devices by using surface oxygen/hydrogen plasma treatment [30]. Due to dangling bonds on the surface of c-ZnO NWs, H2O molecules would be absorbed on the c-ZnO NWs surface much easier. If we can prevent the H2O molecule from the surface of the c-ZnO NWs, the spontaneous reaction might not happen and the ZnO nanodevices would maintain the functionality and performance. The c-ZnO NWs surface passivation can slow down the interaction between the moisture solution and c-ZnO NWs surface; the passive c-ZnO NWs would not have the spontaneous reaction in the same humidity treatment, as seen in Figure 4a,b,c,d). Using oxygen/hydrogen plasma (60 mW) to occupy the oxygen vacancy, the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous reaction can be suppressed, compared with the unpassive c-ZnO NWs. Both O2 and H2 plasma can improve the UV detection ability, but the H2 plasma treatment has stronger enhancement, compared with O2 plasma treatment, as shown in Figure 4e,f. The UV sensing ability of ZnO NWs device also can be enhanced more than twofold by H2 plasma treatment, as shown in Figure 4f. The plasma treatment not only can suppress the spontaneous reaction but also can enhance the UV sensing ability of the ZnO NWs devices.
Figure 4
Figure 4

The c-ZnO NWs have been passivated by O 2 /H 2 plasma treatment. (a, b) c-ZnO NW with O2 plasma (60 mW, 1 min) passivation has maintained the original forms after 48 h humidity (80% ± 2.5%) treatment. (c, d) ZnO NWs with H2 plasma (60 mW, 1 min) passivation also have no a-ZnO NBs spontaneous reaction from the ZnO NWs. (e) For O2 plasma treatment, the UV sensing ability can be improved. (f) For H2 plasma treatment, the UV sensing ability of ZnO nanodevice also enhanced more than two fold.


We have demonstrated that c-ZnO NWs would spontaneously react in humid environment; a-ZnO NBs structure can be grown with the appropriate humidity (around 70% to 85%). The spontaneous reaction is due to the interaction between the H2O molecules and the surface of c-ZnO NWs. The spontaneous reaction mechanism also can be proved by OM, SEM, KPFM, and TEM analyses. Finally, the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous reaction also can be suppressed by oxygen/hydrogen plasma surface passivation treatment; the plasma treatment could passivate the surface of the c-ZnO NWs from the H2O molecule. The spontaneous reaction would not happen, and the ZnO NWs devices would maintain the functionality; for UV sensing, the sensitivity could be enhanced more than twofold by using H2 plasma treatment. This research not only provides the mechanism and methods of the a-ZnO NBs spontaneous reaction but also offers the passivation treatment for intensifying ZnO NWs device application in humid environment and enhancing the UV light detection sensitivity.




This research was also supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Contracts No. NSC-101-2112-M-032-004-MY3.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics, Tamkang University, Tansui, Taiwan
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan


  1. Law M, Greene LE, Johnson JC, Saykally R, Yang P: Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat Mater 2005, 4: 455–459. 10.1038/nmat1387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Q, Dandeneau CS, Zhou X, Cao G: ZnO nanostructures for dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 4087–4108. 10.1002/adma.200803827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hu Y, Zhang Y, Chang Y, Snyder RL, Wang ZL: Optimizing the power output of a ZnO photocell by piezopotential. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 4220–4224. 10.1021/nn1010045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yang Q, Wang W, Xu S, Wang ZL: Enhancing light emission of ZnO microwire-based diodes by piezo-phototronic effect. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 4012–4017. 10.1021/nl202619dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang ZL: Progress in piezotronics and piezo-phototronics. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 4632–4646. 10.1002/adma.201104365View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang Y, Wang ZL: Theory of piezo-phototronics for light-emitting diodes. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 4712–4718. 10.1002/adma.201104263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wei T-Y, Yeh P-H, Lu S-Y, Wang ZL: Gigantic enhancement in sensitivity using Schottky contacted nanowire nanosensor. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 17690–17695. 10.1021/ja907585cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhou J, Gu Y, Hu Y, Mai W, Yeh P-H, Bao G, Sood AK, Polla DL, Wang ZL: Gigantic enhancement in response and reset time of ZnO UV nanosensor by utilizing Schottky contact and surface functionalization. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 191103. 10.1063/1.3133358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Yeh P-H, Li Z, Wang ZL: Schottky-gated probe-free ZnO nanowire biosensor. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 4975–4978. 10.1002/adma.200902172View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhou J, Xu NS, Wang ZL: Dissolving behavior and stability of ZnO wires in biofluids: a study on biodegradability and biocompatibility of ZnO nanostructures. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 2432–2435. 10.1002/adma.200600200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Li Z, Yang R, Yu M, Bai F, Li C, Wang ZL: Cellular level biocompatibility and biosafety of ZnO nanowires. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 20114–20117. 10.1021/jp808878pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang W, Yuhas BD, Yang P: Magnetotransport in Co-doped ZnO nanowires. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 892–896. 10.1021/nl8038184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang ZL: Towards self-powered nanosystems: from nanogenerators to nanopiezotronics. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18: 3553–3567. 10.1002/adfm.200800541View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu M-P, Song J, Lu M-Y, Chen M-T, Gao Y, Chen L-J, Wang ZL: Piezoelectric nanogenerator using p-type ZnO nanowire arrays. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 1223–1227. 10.1021/nl900115yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu CJ, Lin YH, Tang CW, Tsai MY, Hsu WK, Kuo HF: ZnO-coated carbon nanotubes: flexible piezoelectric generators. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 2941–2945. 10.1002/adma.201100358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sohn JI, Cha SN, Song BG, Lee S, Kim SM, Ku J, Kim HJ, Park YJ, Choi BL, Wang ZL, Kim JM, Kim K: Engineering of efficiency limiting free carriers and an interfacial energy barrier for an enhancing piezoelectric generation. Energy Environ Sci 2013, 6: 97–104. 10.1039/c2ee23404aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang X, Zhou J, Song J, Liu J, Xu N, Wang ZL: Piezoelectric field effect transistor and nanoforce sensor based on a single ZnO nanowire. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 2768–2772. 10.1021/nl061802gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fei P, Yeh P-H, Zhou J, Xu S, Gao Y, Song J, Gu Y, Huang Y, Wang ZL: Piezoelectric potential gated field-effect transistor based on a free-standing ZnO wire. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 3435–3439. 10.1021/nl901606bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang S, Sheng H, Liu Y, Huo Z, Lu Y, Shen H: ZnO Schottky ultraviolet photodetectors. J Cryst Growth 2001, 225: 110–113. 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)00830-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chatman S, Poduska KM: The effect of synthesis conditions and humidity on current–voltage relations in electrodeposited ZnO-based Schottky junctions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2009, 1: 552–558. 10.1021/am800049uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou J, Fei P, Gu Y, Mai W, Gao Y, Yang R, Bao G, Wang ZL: Piezoelectric-potential-controlled polarity-reversible Schottky diodes and switches of ZnO wires. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3973–3977. 10.1021/nl802497eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu X-Y, Shan C-X, Wang S-P, Zhao H-F, Shen D-Z: Intense emission from ZnO nanocolumn Schottky diodes. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 7746–7749. 10.1039/c3nr02263cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou J, Gu Y, Fei P, Mai W, Gao Y, Yang R, Bao G, Wang ZL: Flexible piezotronic strain sensor. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3035–3040. 10.1021/nl802367tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang S-Y, Yang N-H, Huang Y-C, Lin S-J, Kattamis TZ, Liu C-Y: Spontaneous growth of one-dimensional nanostructures from films in ambient atmosphere at room temperature: ZnO and TiO2. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 4264–4271. 10.1039/c0jm03536jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan Z, Tao J, Zhu Y, Huang J-F, Paranthaman MP: Spontaneous growth of ZnCO3 nanowires on ZnO nanostructures in normal ambient environment: unstable ZnO nanostructures. Chem Mater 2009, 22: 149–154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pan ZW, Dai ZR, Wang ZL: Nanobelts of semiconducting oxides. Science 2001, 291: 1947–1949. 10.1126/science.1058120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamabi S, Imai H: Growth conditions for wurtzite zinc oxide films in aqueous solutions. J Mater Chem 2002, 12: 3773–3778. 10.1039/b205384eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Peterson RB, Fields CL, Gregg BA: Epitaxial chemical deposition of ZnO nanocolumns from NaOH solutions. Langmuir 2004, 20: 5114–5118. 10.1021/la049683cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dem'yanets LN, Kostomarov DV, Kuz'mina IP: Chemistry and kinetics of ZnO growth from alkaline hydrothermal solutions. Inorg Mater 2002, 38: 124–131. 10.1023/A:1014008909633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsu JK, Lin TY, Lai CY, Chien TC, Song JH, Yeh PH: Tunable Schottky barrier height and surface potential by using hydrogen ions. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 103: 123507. 10.1063/1.4821425View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Lai et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.