Magnetic resonance imaging of glioma with novel APTS-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
- Kangan Li†1Email author,
- Mingwu Shen†2Email author,
- Linfeng Zheng†1,
- Jinglong Zhao1,
- Qimeng Quan1,
- Xiangyang Shi2 and
- Guixiang Zhang1Email author
© Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 31 March 2014
Accepted: 6 June 2014
Published: 15 June 2014
We report in vitro and in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of C6 glioma cells with a novel acetylated 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTS)-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs). In the present study, APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were formed via a one-step hydrothermal approach and then chemically modified with acetic anhydride to generate surface charge-neutralized NPs. Prussian blue staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data showed that acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs can be taken up by cells. Combined morphological observation, cell viability, and flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle indicated that the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs did not significantly affect cell morphology, viability, or cell cycle, indicating their good biocompatibility. Finally, the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles were used in magnetic resonance imaging of C6 glioma. Our results showed that the developed acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs can be used as an effective labeling agent to detect C6 glioma cells in vitro and in vivo for MR imaging. The results from the present study indicate that the developed acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs have a potential application in MR imaging.
The molecular imaging (MI) of tumors has recently gained widespread use [1–4] due to its ability to facilitate quantitative and repetitive imaging of targeted molecules and biological processes in living organisms [2, 5, 6]. Contrast agents are generally required for high-quality MI diagnosis. Advances in nanotechnology enable the development of various nanoparticles (NPs) as contrast agents for effective MI in the diagnosis or analysis of diseases. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are a promising form of imaging probe that can accumulated in cells and generate a strong magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast in T2- or T2*-weighted images . To date, SPIONs have been used to investigate several pathophysiological processes in tumor cells [8, 9], transplanted cells [1, 7, 10], or precursor cells in vivo[11–13].
SPION probes are generally comprised of superparamagnetic iron oxide cores of magnetite or maghemite NPs encased in various coatings. Cellular uptake of SPIONs may be achieved by phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, or receptor-mediated endocytosis [2, 14, 15]. For effective MR imaging applications, synthesizing SPIONs with controllable sizes and surface functionalities is important, given that the in vivo biomedical performance, especially the opsonization, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution, of the SPIONs can be directly impacted by the particle's size and surface modifications . Various methods have been employed to synthesize SPIONs with controllable size, such as controlled co-precipitation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions at an elevated temperature , successive reduction-oxidation process in a reverse micelle system , thermal decomposition , and a hydrothermal method under higher pressures . To make SPIONs with good water dispersity and desired surface functionality for biomedical applications, surfactant molecules [21, 22], silane agents [23–25] or other small molecular ligands [9, 26–28], polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivatives [29, 30], and dendrimers [15, 31, 32] have been used to modify SPIONs using either in situ modifications or post-modification approaches.
In our previous work, we adopted a simple one-step 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTS)-assisted hydrothermal approach to synthesize APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs with reactive surface amine groups . The APTS modification endowed Fe3O4 NPs with an excellent water dispersibility and colloidal stability. Additionally, these APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs can be further functionalized with acetyl groups with neutral surface potential following the reaction of the surface APTS amines with acetic anhydride. Our results suggest that the presence of APTS molecules not only enables efficient APTS coating of the particles with reactive amine groups but also significantly limits the particle growth. This prior success led us to hypothesize that acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs may serve as a labeling agent for MR imaging of cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo.
In the present study, we synthesized acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs with a mean diameter of 6.5 nm, similar to our previous report . The formed acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were used as a labeling agent for in vitro and in vivo MR imaging of C6 glioma cells. The cellular uptake of the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was confirmed by Prussian blue staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging. Combined morphological observation of the cells, a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay of cell viability, and flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs.
Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2 · 4H2O >99%), ammonia (28% to 30% NH3 in aqueous solution), triethylamine, acetic anhydride, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The APTS and acetic anhydride were from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). C6 glioma cells (a rat C6 glioma cell line) were purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). RPMI 1640 medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, and streptomycin were purchased from Hangzhou Jinuo Biomedical Technology (Hangzhou, China). The MTT was acquired from Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The water that was used in all of the experiments was purified using a Milli-Q Plus 185 water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) with a resistivity that was higher than 18.2 MΩ cm.
The synthesis of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized using a hydrothermal approach, which was described in our previous study [20, 33]. Typically, FeCl2 · 4H2O (1.25 g) was dissolved in 7.75 mL water. Under vigorous stirring, ammonium hydroxide (6.25 mL) was added, and the suspension was continuously stirred in air for 10 min. Next, 2.5 mL APTS was added, and the reaction mixture was autoclaved (KH-50 Autoclave, Shanghai Yuying Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in a sealed pressure vessel with a volume of 50 mL at 134°C. After 3 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. The black precipitate was collected and purified with water five times and with ethanol twice via a centrifugation-dispersion process (5,000 rpm, 10 min) to remove excess reactants. Lastly, the obtained APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were dispersed in ethanol.
The amine groups on the surface of the APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were further acetylated via a reaction with acetic anhydride, following the protocols described in our previous study . Briefly, 1 mL of triethylamine was added to the APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs (6 mg) solution that was dispersed in ethanol (5 mL), and the solution was thoroughly mixed. A DMSO solution (5 mL) that contained acetic anhydride (1 mL) was added dropwise into the solution of APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs, which was mixed with triethylamine while being stirred vigorously. The mixture was allowed to react for 24 h. The DMSO, excess reactants, and by-products were removed from the mixture by a centrifugation/washing/dispersion step that was repeated five times to obtain acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs dispersed in water.
The morphology of the formed acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was observed by TEM imaging using a JEOL 2010 F analytical electron microscope (Akishima-shi, Japan) that operated at 200 kV. The TEM sample was prepared by placing one drop of diluted suspension of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs (5 μL) onto a 200-mesh carbon-coated copper grid and air-dried prior to measurement. The size of the NPs was measured using ImageJ 1.40G image analysis software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download.html). A minimum of 200 randomly selected NPs in different TEM images were analyzed for each sample to acquire the size distribution histogram.
The transverse relaxometry was performed using a Signa HDxt 3.0 T superconductor magnetic resonance system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a wrist receiver coil. For the MR transverse relaxometry measurements, the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs (1 mL) that were dispersed in water at different concentrations were separately added to 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes. The transverse relaxation times (T2) were measured using a multi-echo fast spin echo (MFSE) sequence. A total of eight echoes were used with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 500 ms, echo time (TE) = 21.9 ms, flip angle = 90°, resolution = 256 × 256, section thickness = 2 mm, and field of view (FOV) = 80 × 80 mm. The R2 mapping was performed using a workstation running Functool 4.5.3 (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The transverse relaxivities (R2, 1/T2) were determined using a linear fit of 1/T2 as a function of the Fe concentration of the particles. The Fe concentration of the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was analyzed using Prodigy inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (Teledyne Leeman Labs, Hudson, NH, USA) following aqua regia treatment.
Cytotoxicity of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
The C6 glioma cells were continuously grown in a 50-mL culture flask in regular RPMI 1640 medium that was supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 U/mL streptomycin. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to quantify the viability of the cells upon treatment with the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs. Briefly, 1 × 104 C6 glioma cells per well were seeded into a 96-well plate. Following overnight incubation to bring the cells to confluence, the medium was replaced with fresh medium that contained the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs at different concentrations (0, 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL). After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the metabolically active cells were subsequently detected by adding MTT to each well. The assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the absorbance of each well was measured using a Thermo Scientific Multiskan MK3 ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 570 nm. The mean and the standard error mean (SEM) for the triplicate wells were reported and normalized. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical analyses were performed to detect the difference between the cells that were incubated with different concentrations of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs and the control cells, which were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The statistical significance level was set to 0.05.
The cytotoxicity of the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was further examined using flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle and apoptosis . C6 glioma cells were seeded in six-well cell culture plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well in quadruplet and were allowed to grow to confluence for 24 h. Next, after replacing the medium with fresh medium that contained different concentrations of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs (0, 50, and 100 μg/mL), the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. Following the treatment, the cells were harvested by trypsinization and centrifugation, washed with PBS buffer, and fixed in citrate buffer for 2 h. The cells were later centrifuged to remove the citrate buffer and resuspended with PBS buffer with a cell concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. The cell suspensions were incubated with trypsinogen for 3 min and then incubated with RNase for 3 min. Subsequently, the cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min, and the PI-stained cells were then counted using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in the red (FL2) channel at 488 nm. The cell cycle profiles, including the G1, G2, and S, phases, and sub-G1 fractions were analyzed using CellQuest software (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Cellular uptake of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
The cellular uptake of the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was primarily evaluated by Prussian blue staining. The C6 glioma cells were plated in 12-well cell culture plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS for 24 h. Following this step, the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were added to each well at different concentrations (0, 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL) and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Next, the cells were stained with Pearl's Prussian blue solution. First, the samples were treated with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and were subsequently washed with Tris-NaCl buffer. The samples were subsequently exposed to Pearl's solution for 30 min before being washed with water. After that, the samples were plated onto sterile coverslips prior to microscopic imaging. The cell morphology with Prussian blue staining was observed by optical microscopy (IX71-F22FL/PH, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The magnification was set at × 200 for all of the samples.
The cellular uptake of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs was further observed by TEM imaging. The C6 glioma cells were plated in six-well cell culture plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS for 24 h. These cells were allowed to grow to approximately 80% confluence. Next, the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were added to each well at a final concentration of 25 μg/mL and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The culture medium was discarded, and the cells were washed with PBS buffer, trypsinized, centrifuged, washed three times with PBS buffer, and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 12 h at 4°C. The cells were then post-fixed with 1% OsO4 in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2 h at 4°C. After additional washes in buffer, the cells were dehydrated and embedded with Epon 812 (Shell Chemical, UK), followed by polymerization. Next, the embedded cells were sectioned using a Reichert-Jung Ultramicrotome (Vienna, Austria). The sections with a thickness of 75 nm were mounted onto 200-mesh copper grids and counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 5 min, respectively, prior to the TEM measurements. The grids were visualized using an H600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) with an operating voltage of 60 kV.
The intracellular uptake of APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs in the C6 glioma cells was quantified using a Prodigy ICP-AES system (Teledyne Leeman Labs, Hudson, NH, USA). For ICP-AES analysis, 1 × 106 cells were seeded onto a six-well cell culture plate for 24 h. The cells were then incubated with different concentrations of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs (0, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for 24 h. The cells were washed with PBS buffer three times, trypsinized, and harvested by centrifugation. The digestion of the cells was performed in aqua regia, and the amount of iron uptake in the cells was then quantified using ICP-AES.
In vitro MR imaging of C6 glioma cells
C6 glioma cells were cultured in 10 mL RPMI 1640 that was supplemented with 10% FBS on cell culture discs, and the medium was changed every 24 to 48 h. The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air. The cells were labeled with acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs at different concentrations (10, 25, or 50 μg/mL, respectively). Next, 1 × 106 labeled cells were placed into 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes supplemented with 1 mL 1% agarose gel. An Eppendorf tube filled with 1 mL 1% agarose gel was used as a control. All of the cell phantom MR studies were performed using a Signa HDxt 3.0 T superconductor magnetic resonance system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). An axial scan was performed using an eight-channel array head coil. R2 mapping was performed using the MFSE sequence, with a total of eight echoes and the following parameters: TR = 500 ms, TE = 21.9 ms, flip angle = 90°, resolution = 256 × 256, section thickness = 2 mm, and FOV = 80 × 80 mm. The R2 mapping reconstruction was performed by two imaging experts on a workstation running Functool 4.5.3 (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The R2 values were calculated and recorded as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
In vivo MR imaging
Animal experiments were designed in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai First People's Hospital (Approval ID 2012-115). Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (Shanghai Slac Laboratory Animal Center, Shanghai, China) underwent surgical implantation of C6 glioma cells that were labeled with acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs as per the following protocol. Briefly, the C6 glioma cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 that was supplemented with 10% FBS on cell culture discs and which were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air. The medium was changed every 24 to 48 h. Prior to implantation surgery, the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were added into the cell culture dish at a final concentration of 25 μg/mL for an incubation of approximately 4 h. Next, the culture medium was discarded, and the cells were trypsinized, centrifuged, and washed three times with PBS buffer. In the control group, the C6 glioma cells were incubated with PBS buffer for 4 h. The SD rats were anesthetized with 1% isobarbital (3 mL/kg of body weight) delivered intraperitoneally. A sphenotresia was then performed using a stereotaxic apparatus (Gene&I, Beijing, China). One million C6 glioma cells (10 μL) that were labeled with the acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs were injected within 10 min into the left frontal lobes of one rat (n = 12). In the control group, 1 × 106 unlabeled C6 glioma cells were injected at a rate of 1 μL/min for 10 min into the left frontal lobe of six rats. The MR imaging (MRI) scans of the rats were performed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-injection using a Signa HDxt 3.0 T superconductor magnetic resonance system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). An axial scan was performed using a custom-built rodent receiver coil (Chenguang Med Tech, Shanghai, China). The following parameters were used for the T2-weighted images: SE/2D sequence, TR = 2,500 ms, TE = 81.9 ms, resolution = 256 × 128, section thickness = 2.4 mm, and FOV = 80 × 80 mm. The R2 mapping was performed using a MFSE sequence, with a total of eight echoes and the following parameters: TR = 500 ms, TE = 21.9 ms, flip angle = 90°, resolution = 256 × 256, section thickness = 2 mm, and FOV = 80 × 80 mm. The R2 mapping reconstruction was performed by two imaging experts on a workstation running Functool 4.5.3 (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The R2 values in the tumor area were calculated and recorded as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) and analyzed using a two-tailed, time-dependent, paired t test.
Following the final MRI scan, each rat was deeply anesthetized, and the tumor was resected. The tumor tissues were post-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4) for 24 h. The samples were then dehydrated, embedded, and sectioned into 4-μm-thick slices. After dewaxing and rehydration, the tumor sections were stained with Pearl's Prussian blue solution and hematoxylin and eosin, following the manufacturer's instructions.
Results and discussion
The synthesis and characterization of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
Transverse relaxivity of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
The cytotoxicity of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs
Apoptosis and cell cycle analysis of C6 glioma cells following incubation with Fe 3 O 4 NPs for 4 h
Cell cycle (%)
2.39 ± 0.14
27.32 ± 0.45
19.42 ± 0.07
53.27 ± 0.33
1.93 ± 0.01
2.38 ± 0.29
27.22 ± 0.43
18.74 ± 0.12
54.05 ± 0.39
1.93 ± 0.02
2.40 ± 0.33
27.38 ± 0.52
18.64 ± 0.13
55.02 ± 0.41
1.93 ± 0.01
The in vitro cellular uptake of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4NPs
The in vitro MR detection of C6 glioma cells
In vivo MR imaging of xenografted C6 glioma tumor model
In summary, we developed a novel type of acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs with a mean diameter of 6.5 nm for MR imaging both in vitro and in vivo. Combined morphological observation of cells, MTT assays of cell viability, and flow cytometric analyses of cell cycle characteristics indicate that acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs do not appreciably affect the cell morphology, viability, or the cell cycle, indicating their good biocompatibility at the given concentration range. Furthermore, Prussian blue staining of cell morphology, TEM imaging, and ICP-AES quantification data indicate that acetylated APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs are able to be taken up by cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The intracellular uptake of the particles enables effective MR imaging of model tumor cells (e.g., C6 glioma cells) in vitro and in the xenograft tumor model in vivo. Moreover, given the relatively high transverse relaxivity and the tunable amine chemistry of APTS-coated Fe3O4 NPs, which can be further functionalized with various targeting ligands (e.g., folic acid and RGD peptides), it is expected that such NPs may be further biofunctionalized for various biomedical applications, especially for targeted MR imaging.
This research is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101150, 21273032, 81271384, 81371623, and 81201132), the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan Period (No. 2011BAI08B10), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (11ZR1429300 and 12ZR1424900), the Medical Guiding Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Grant No. 114119a0800), the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical Engineering Crossover Fund Project (No. YG2011MS47), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, State Education Ministry, the Fund of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (11 nm0506400 and 11JC1410500), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (for MS and XS). KL thanks the Shanghai Songjiang Medical Climbing Program (2011PD04). LZ thanks the State Scholarship Fund by the China Scholarship Council and Award for the best youth medical scholars of Shanghai First People's Hospital. XS gratefully acknowledges the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and Santander bank for the Chair in Nanotechnology.
- Arbab AS, Janic B, Haller J, Pawelczyk E, Liu W, Frank JA: In vivo cellular imaging for translational medical research. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2009, 5: 19–38. 10.2174/157340509787354697View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Artemov D, Mori N, Ravi R, Bhujwalla ZM: Magnetic resonance molecular imaging of the HER-2/neu receptor. Cancer Res 2003, 63: 2723–2727.Google Scholar
- Moore A, Medarova Z, Potthast A, Dai G: In vivo targeting of underglycosylated MUC-1 tumor antigen using a multimodal imaging probe. Cancer Res 2004, 64: 1821–1827. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3230View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Xie J, Zhou X, Cheng Z, Gu N, Teng G, Hu Q, Zhu F, Chang S, Zhang F, Lu G, Chen X: Ferritin enhances SPIO tracking of C6 rat glioma cells by MRI. Mol Imaging Biol 2011, 13: 87–93. 10.1007/s11307-010-0338-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Wilson LB, Parwana A, Jordan EK, Kalish H, Frank JA: Comparison of transfection agents in forming complexes with ferumoxides, cell labeling efficiency, and cellular viability. Mol Imaging 2004, 3: 24–32. 10.1162/153535004773861697View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Dharmakumar R, Mascheri N, Fan Z, Wu S, Li D: Comparison of superparamagnetic and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide cell labeling for tracking green fluorescent protein gene marker with negative and positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Imaging 2009, 8: 148–155.Google Scholar
- Balakumaran A, Pawelczyk E, Ren J, Sworder B, Chaudhry A, Sabatino M, Stroncek D, Frank JA, Robey PG: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles labeling of bone marrow stromal (mesenchymal) cells does not affect their “stemness”. PLoS One 2010, 5: e11462. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011462View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold LJ Jr, Dagan A, Gutheil J, Kaplan NO: Antineoplastic activity of poly(L-lysine) with some ascites tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979, 76: 3246–3250. 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie J, Chen K, Lee H-Y, Xu C, Hsu AR, Peng S, Chen X, Sun S: Ultrasmall c(RGDyK)-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their specific targeting to integrin alpha(v)beta3-rich tumor cells. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 7542–7543. 10.1021/ja802003hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kraitchman DL, Gilson WD, Lorenz CH: Stem cell therapy: MRI guidance and monitoring. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27: 299–310. 10.1002/jmri.21263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen ME, Muja N, Fainstein N, Bulte JW, Ben-Hur T: Conserved fate and function of ferumoxides-labeled neural precursor cells in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci Res 2010, 88: 936–944.Google Scholar
- Kim H, Walczak P, Muja N, Campanelli JT, Bulte JW: ICV-transplanted human glial precursor cells are short-lived yet exert immunomodulatory effects in mice with EAE. Glia 2012, 60: 1117–1129. 10.1002/glia.22339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neri M, Maderna C, Cavazzin C, Deidda-Vigoriti V, Politi LS, Scotti G, Marzola P, Sbarbati A, Vescovi AL, Gritti A: Efficient in vitro labeling of human neural precursor cells with superparamagnetic iron oxide particles: relevance for in vivo cell tracking. Stem Cells 2008, 26: 505–516. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0251View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pawelczyk E, Arbab AS, Pandit S, Hu E, Frank JA: Expression of transferrin receptor and ferritin following ferumoxides-protamine sulfate labeling of cells: implications for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 2006, 19: 581–592. 10.1002/nbm.1038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang SH, Shi XY, Van Antwerp M, Cao ZY, Swanson SD, Bi XD, Baker JR Jr: Dendrimer-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles for specific targeting and imaging of cancer cells. Adv Funct Mater 2007, 17: 3043–3050. 10.1002/adfm.200601139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta AK, Gupta M: Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26: 3995–4021. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gass J, Poddar P, Almand J, Srinath S, Srikanth H: Superparamagnetic polymer nanocomposites with uniform Fe3O4 nanoparticle dispersions. Adv Funct Mater 2006, 16: 71–75. 10.1002/adfm.200500335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iida H, Nakanishi T, Takada H, Osaka T: Preparation of magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles by successive reduction-oxidation in reverse micelles: effects of reducing agent and atmosphere. Electrochim Acta 2006, 52: 292–296. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun SH, Zeng H: Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 8204–8205. 10.1021/ja026501xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ge S, Shi XY, Sun K, Li CP, Uher C, Baker JR Jr, Holl MMB, Orr BG: Facile hydrothermal synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles with tunable magnetic properties. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 13593–13599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng J, Mao J, Wen XG, Tu MJ: Ultrasonic-assisted in situ synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Alloy Compd 2011, 509: 9093–9097. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu YL, Qin Y, Palchoudhury S, Bao YP: Water-soluble iron oxide nanoparticles with high stability and selective surface functionality. Langmuir 2011, 27: 8990–8997. 10.1021/la201652hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giri S, Trewyn BG, Stellmaker MP, Lin VSY: Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 2005, 44: 5038–5044. 10.1002/anie.200501819View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohapatra S, Pramanik N, Mukherjee S, Ghosh SK, Pramanik P: A simple synthesis of amine-derivatised superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for bioapplications. J Mater Sci 2007, 42: 7566–7574. 10.1007/s10853-007-1597-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu W, He Q, Jiang C: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008, 3: 397–415. 10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng L, Yang K, Li Y, Chen J, Wang C, Shao M, Lee S-T, Liu Z: Facile preparation of multifunctional upconversion nanoprobes for multimodal imaging and dual-targeted photothermal therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50: 7385–7390. 10.1002/anie.201101447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huh Y-M, Jun Y-w, Song H-T, Kim S, Choi J-s, Lee J-H, Yoon S, Kim K-S, Shin J-S, Suh J-S, Cheon J: In vivo magnetic resonance detection of cancer by using multifunctional magnetic nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127: 12387–12391. 10.1021/ja052337cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song H-T, Choi J-s, Huh Y-M, Kim S, Jun Y-w, Suh J-S, Cheon J: Surface modulation of magnetic nanocrystals in the development of highly efficient magnetic resonance probes for intracellular labeling. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127: 9992–9993. 10.1021/ja051833yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu FQ, Li Z, Tu CF, Gao MY: Preparation of magnetite nanocrystals with surface reactive moieties by one-pot reaction. J Colloid Interf Sci 2007, 311: 469–474. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu FQ, Wei L, Zhou Z, Ran YL, Li Z, Gao MY: Preparation of biocompatible magnetite nanocrystals for in vivo magnetic resonance detection of cancer. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 2553–2556. 10.1002/adma.200600385View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen M, Shi X: Dendrimer-based organic/inorganic hybrid nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2010, 2: 1596–1610. 10.1039/c0nr00072hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi XY, Wang SH, Swanson SD, Ge S, Cao ZY, Van Antwerp ME, Landmark KJ, Baker JR Jr: Dendrimer-functionalized shell-crosslinked iron oxide nanoparticles for in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging of tumors. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 1671–1678. 10.1002/adma.200702770View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen M, Cai H, Wang X, Cao X, Li K, Wang SH, Guo R, Zheng L, Zhang G, Shi X: Facile one-pot preparation, surface functionalization, and toxicity assay of APTS-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2012, 23: 105601. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/10/105601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng C, Li K, Cao X, Xiao T, Hou W, Zheng L, Guo R, Shen M, Zhang G, Shi X: Facile formation of dendrimer-stabilized gold nanoparticles modified with diatrizoic acid for enhanced computed tomography imaging applications. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 6768–6778. 10.1039/c2nr31687kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith JA, Martin L: Do cells cycle? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1973, 70: 1263–1267. 10.1073/pnas.70.4.1263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolbeare F, Gratzner H, Pallavicini MG, Gray JW: Flow cytometric measurement of total DNA content and incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983, 80: 5573–5577. 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5573View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kajstura M, Halicka HD, Pryjma J, Darzynkiewicz Z: Discontinuous fragmentation of nuclear DNA during apoptosis revealed by discrete “sub-G1” peaks on DNA content histograms. Cytometry A 2007, 71: 125–131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.