Open Access

Fabrication of low-density GaN/AlN quantum dots via GaN thermal decomposition in MOCVD

  • Jin Zhang1,
  • Senlin Li1,
  • Hui Xiong1,
  • Wu Tian1,
  • Yang Li1,
  • Yanyan Fang1,
  • Zhihao Wu1,
  • Jiangnan Dai1Email author,
  • Jintong Xu2,
  • Xiangyang Li2 and
  • Changqing Chen1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:341

Received: 15 April 2014

Accepted: 20 June 2014

Published: 9 July 2014


With an appropriate high anneal temperature under H2 atmosphere, GaN quantum dots (QDs) have been fabricated via GaN thermal decomposition in metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Based on the characterization of atomic force microscopy (AFM), the obtained GaN QDs show good size distribution and have a low density of 2.4 × 108 cm-2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis demonstrates that the GaN QDs were formed without Ga droplets by thermal decomposition of GaN.


GaN quantum dotsThermal decompositionLow densityMOCVD


Low-dimensional III-nitrides materials have gained much research attention because of their strong carrier confinement which may lead to the realization of next-generation electronic and optoelectronic applications [15]. Among these low-dimensional III-nitride materials, the study of single GaN quantum dot has become the recent focus due to its promising applications in the solid-state quantum computation, single-photon sources, and single-photon detectors, in which the density of quantum dots is required to be as low as approximately 108 cm-2[69]. However, challenges remains in fabrication of low-density GaN quantum dots (QDs) with high quality. On the one hand, the most frequently used fabrication approach is self-assembly process via Stranski-Krastanov (SK) growth mode which requires sufficient lattice mismatch, but it is harder to acquire low-density GaN QDs and usually results in randomly distributed QDs with different sizes [10, 11]. On the other hand, although some low-density GaN nanodots can be obtained by the droplet epitaxy technique based on a vapor-liquid-solid process which offers distinct advantages in size and density manipulation of QDs, the droplet epitaxy technique usually results in QDs with the incomplete transition from Ga droplet to crystal GaN. What is more, there is almost no report about fabrication of low-density GaN QDs via the droplet epitaxy technique [12, 13]. Motivated by the above issues, recently, we have demonstrated the fabrication of GaN nanodots on AlN templates via GaN thermal decomposition in H2 atmosphere, which does not involve the induction of strain or the crystallization of the Ga droplets [14]. In addition, the recent studies and applications of GaN-based materials growth have been demonstrated [1520]. In this letter, the thermal decomposition conditions are further optimized and low-density GaN/AlN QDs with high quality are achieved. This study provides an alternative approach to fabricating low-density GaN QDs for single-photon devices.


GaN QDs were formed on AlN/sapphire templates by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Triethylgallium (TEGa), trimethylaluminum (TMAl), and ammonia were used as precursors for Ga, Al, and N sources with H2 as carrier gas. The total pressure was maintained at 40 Torr. The sapphire substrates were introduced into the MOCVD reactor and 800-nm-thick AlN buffer layers were deposited. Then, 800-nm-thick GaN epilayers were grown on the AlN templates at 940°C. Subsequently, the samples were annealed in H2 atmosphere at different conditions: sample A, at 1,050°C for 5 min; sample B, at 1,100°C for 5 min and sample C, at 1,100°C for 8 min, as shown in Figure 1. After that, these samples were cooled down to room temperature at the presence of NH3 + H2. Besides, two controlled experiments were also conducted. One was the growth of 800-nm-thick GaN on 800-nm-thick AlN/sapphire without decomposition in H2 (sample D), and another one is an 800-nm-thick AlN buffer template on sapphire without decomposition in H2 (sample E). The surface morphologies of all samples were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements. The surface chemistries of obtained GaN QDs and some control samples were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements with monochromatic Mg Kα X-ray source (hν = 1,253.6 eV).
Figure 1

The schematic of H 2 -annealed conditions of samples A, B, and C.

Results and discussion

The surface morphologies of all samples were studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and the results are shown in Figure 2. Compared with the surface morphology of controlled sample D (Figure 2d), it is obvious that GaN decomposition occurs for Sample A (Figure 1a). Figure 1f is the corresponding three-dimensional (3D) AFM image of Figure 1a, in which distributed dots are on terraces and abrupt peaks are to be buried in the side wall, indicating the decomposition process for the formation of GaN dots. As the decomposition occurred toward the inner of the side wall, the abrupt peaks are then exposed to H2 flow and decomposed. Since the heights of peaks decrease faster than the diameters of peaks, the side wall is etched away and the peaks are etched to small dots with a longer etching time, which is consistent with our previous observation [14]. With increasing of the annealing temperature from 1,050°C to 1,100°C, the decomposition of GaN has an interesting phenomenon that the steps disappear and well-shaped dots are just left on a flat surface, as shown in Figure 2b. The obtained GaN QDs show a low density in the magnitude of approximately 108 cm-2. As expected, these dots are etched as the elongation of annealing time from 5 to 8 min, left with atomically flat surface (Figure 2c) similar to that of controlled sample E (Figure 2e). It is clear that surface morphology of the AlN buffer templates before and after annealing in H2 are exactly the same, indicating that no decomposion of AlN takes place at the temperature of 1,100°C. This result is in good agreement with the claim made by Y. Kumagai et al. [21].
Figure 2

AFM images of samples. Samples (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) corresponding the 3D AFM image of sample A.

To further investigate the size distribution of the obtained GaN QDs, the AFM images of sample B with scan area 10 × 10 μm2 is shown in Figure 3a. The QDs have a low density of approximately 2.4 × 108 cm-2 and no obvious big dots are observed, showing the good uniformity. Figure 3b illustrates the diameter histograms obtained by the AFM analysis of Figure 3a. It is clear that the most probable diameter is in the range from 70 to 80 nm. The inset of Figure 3b shows a detailed 3D AFM image of the QDs in 1 × 1 μm2, indicating the similar well-formed dot structure. According to the results above, the obtained GaN QDs have a good size distribution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of low-density GaN QDs fabricated via GaN thermal decomposition in MOCVD.
Figure 3

AFM images of sample B (a) and diameter distributions of GaN QDs (b). (a) Scan area 10 × 10 μm2; (b) Analyzed from the AFM images of sample B. Inset is the 3D image of obtained GaN QDs.

As is shown in Figure 4, since XPS analysis was performed for samples A, B, and C, Ga2p and N1s core level spectra were measured. For both of the XPS spectra, the C1s peak at approximately 285.0 eV was used as binding-energy reference. Baselines were fixed using a Shirley background subtraction model and all peaks were fitted using a linear combination of 80% Gaussian and 20% Lorentzian line shapes. On the one hand, the Ga2p spectra are analyzed in Figure 4a. Both samples A and B have a Ga2p peak which can be fitted as only one subpeak located at 1,117.1 eV, which is assigned to Ga-N bond [2224]. So there are no Ga droplets but GaN on the surface of samples A and B, indicating that the Ga desorption rate exceed the GaN decomposition rate. On the contrary, if the Ga desorption rate is less than the GaN decomposition rate, Ga droplets will generate in a chemical manner and Ga-Ga bond will be observed. No Ga2p peaks were observed in sample C, confirming that sample C is just the AlN buffer after H2 decomposition. On the other hand, the N1s spectra are analyzed in Figure 4b. For sample A, the N1s spectra can be decomposed into a total of four fitted subpeaks at 397.0, 398.7, and 400.3 eV, which were assigned to N-Ga bond, N-H2 bond and N-H3 bond [25, 26], respectively. Only GaN existed on the surface of sample A. For sample C, the N1s spectra can be decomposed into one subpeaks at 398.7 eV, which is assigned to N-Al bond [27]. Only AlN existed on the surface of sample C. For sample B, the N1s spectra were decomposed into a total of four fitted subpeaks at 396.2, 397.0, 398.7, and 400.3 eV, which can be assigned to N-Al bond, N-Ga bond, N-H2 bond, and N-H3 bond, respectively. These fitted subpeaks coincide with the fitted subpeaks of samples A and C, providing a chemical evidence for the existence of GaN QDs formed on the AlN buffer. In addition, the N-H2 bond and N-H3 bond were obtained in samples A and B but did not exist in sample C, indicating that the appearance of N-H2 bond and N-H3 bond were caused by the interaction of decomposed GaN and hydrogen at high temperature.
Figure 4

XPS spectra of (a) Ga2 p and (b) N1 s for samples A, B, and C. The background lines and the fitted lines were also subtracted.


In summary, GaN QDs were fabricated on flat AlN buffer via H2 decomposition of GaN film at high temperature. The AFM measurements show that the obtained GaN QDs have good size uniformity and a low dot density about 2.4 × 108 cm-2. The XPS spectra analysis actually demonstrated that the GaN QDs do not contain Ga droplets. The results provide an alternative approach to fabricate low-density GaN QDs for applications in single-photon devices.

Authors’ information

JZ, SLL, WT, and YL are PhD students, HX is the postdoctor, JND, YYF and ZHW hold associate professor positions, and CQC is a professor at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology. XYL and JTX hold the researcher and associate researcher positions at the Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics.



atomic force microscopy




metal-organic chemical vapor deposition


quantum dots








X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.



This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2012CB619302 and 2010CB923204) and in part by the foundation of the Science and Technology Bureau of Wuhan City (Grant No. 2014010101010006).

Authors’ Affiliations

Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
Key Laboratory of Infrared Imaging Materials and Detectors, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China


  1. Kawasaki K, Yamazaki D, Kinoshita A, Hirayama H, Tsutsui K, Aoyagi Y: GaN quantum-dot formation by self-assembling droplet epitaxy and application to single-electron transistors. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 79: 2243–2245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schupp T, Meisch T, Neuschl B, Feneberg M, Thonke K, Lischka K, As DJ: Droplet epitaxy of zinc-blende GaN quantum dots. J Crystal Growth 2010, 312: 3235–3237. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.07.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Li S, Ware M, Wu J, Minor P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Salamo GJ: Polarization induced pn-junction without dopant in graded AlGaN coherently strained on GaN. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 122103. 10.1063/1.4753993View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Li S, Zhang T, Wu J, Yang Y, Wang Z, Wu Z, Chen Z, Jiang Y: Polarization induced hole doping in graded AlxGa1-xN (x = 0.71) layer grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 102: 062108. 10.1063/1.4792685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li S, Ware ME, Wu J, Kunets VP, Hawkridge M, Minor P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Salamo GJ: Polarization doping: reservoir effects of the substrate in AlGaN graded layers. J Appl Phys 2012, 112: 053711. 10.1063/1.4750039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Michler P: Single Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. DiVincenzo DP: Double quantum dot as a quantum bit. Science 2005, 309: 2173–2174. 10.1126/science.1118921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mowbray DJ, Skolnick MS: New physics and devices based on self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots. J Phys D Appl Phys 2005, 38: 2059–2076. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/13/002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Liang CT, Simmons MY, Smith CG, Kim G-H, Ritchie DA, Pepper M: Multilayered gated lateral quantum dot devices. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 1134–1136. 10.1063/1.125961View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Shchukin VA, Ledentsov NN, Bimberg D: Epitaxy of Nanostructures. N.Y.: Springer Verlag; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Lee J, Wang ZM, Hirono Y, Dorogan VG, Mazur YI, Kim ES, Koo SM, Park S, Song S, Salamo GJ: Low-density quantum dot molecules by selective etching using in droplet as a mask. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 2011, 10: 600–605.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Maruyama T, Otsubo H, Kondo T, Yamamoto Y, Naritsuk S: Fabrication of GaN dot structure by droplet epitaxy using NH3. J Cryst Growth 2007, 301: 486–489.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Debnath RK, Stoica-a T, Besmehn A, Jeganathan K, Sutter E, Meijers R, Luth H, Calarco R: Formation of GaN nanodots on Si (111) by droplet nitridation. J Cryst Growth 2009, 311: 3389–3394. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.04.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Xiong H, Zhang J, Li SL, Wang H, Fang YY, Dai JN, Chen CQ: Fabrication of GaN nanodots via GaN thermal decomposition in H2 atmosphere. J Vac Sci Technol B 2013, 31: 050603–050607. 10.1116/1.4817499View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen YS, Liao CH, Chueh YL, Kuo CT, Wang HC: Plan-view transmission electron microscopy study on coalescence overgrowth of GaN nano-columns by MOCVD. Opt Mat Express 2013, 3: 1459–1467. 10.1364/OME.3.001459View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen YS, Liao CH, Cheng YC, Kuo CT, Wang HC: Nanostructure study of the coalescence growth of GaN columns with molecular beam epitaxy. Opt Mat Express 2013, 3: 1450–1458. 10.1364/OME.3.001450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng SW, Tu LW, Wang HC, Sun Q, Han J: The role of growth-pressure on the determination of anisotropy properties in nonpolar m-plane GaN. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 2012, 1: R50-R53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng SW, Lin HC, Chyi JI, Tsai CY, Huang CJ, Wang HC, Yang FW, Lin YS: The impact of trimethylindium treatment time during growth interruption on the carrier dynamics of InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519: 6092–6096. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang HC, Tang TY, Yang CC, Malinauskas T, Jarasiunas K: Carrier dynamics in coalescence overgrowth of GaN nanocolumns. Thin Solid Films 2010, 519: 863. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang HC, Malinauskas T, Jarasiunas K, Feng SW, Ting CC, Liu S: Carrier dynamics in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells based on different polishing processes of sapphire substrate. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518: 7291. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumagai Y, Akiyama K, Togashi R, Murakami H, Takeuchi M, Kinoshita T, Takada K, Aoyagi Y, Koukitu A: Polarity dependence of AlN {0 0 0 1} decomposition in flowing H2. J Crys Growth 2007, 305: 366–371. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.04.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Choi HW, Cheong MG, Rana MA, Chua SJ, Osipowicz T, Pan SJ: Rutherford backscattering analysis of GaN decomposition. J Vac Sci Technol B 2003, 21: 1080–1083. 10.1116/1.1577570View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Choi HW, Rana MA, Chua SJ, Sipowicz TO, Pan JS: Surface analysis of GaN decomposition. Semicond. Sci Technol 2002, 17: 1223–1225. 10.1088/0268-1242/17/12/304View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuriyama K, Tsunoda T, Hayashi N, Yukimi T: Characterization of GaN synthesized in N-ion implanted GaAs. Phys Res B 1999, 148: 432–436.Google Scholar
  25. Carin R, Deville JP, Werckmann J: An XPS study of GaN thin films on GaAs. Surf Interface Anal 1990, 16: 65–69. 10.1002/sia.740160116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li D, Sumiya M, Fuke S, Yang D, Que D, Suzuki Y, Fukuda Y: Selective etching of GaN polar surface in potassium hydroxide solution studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 2001, 90: 4219–4223. 10.1063/1.1402966View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberger L, Baird R, McCullen E, Auner G, Shrevea G: XPS analysis of aluminumnitride films deposited by plasma source molecular beam epitaxy. Surf Interface Anal 2008, 40: 1254–1261. 10.1002/sia.2874View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zhang et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.