Scandium effect on the luminescence of Er-Sc silicates prepared from multi-nanolayer films
© Najar et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 18 June 2014
Accepted: 6 July 2014
Published: 15 July 2014
Polycrystalline Er-Sc silicates (Er x Sc2-xSi2O7 and Er x Sc2-xSiO5) were fabricated using multilayer nanostructured films of Er2O3/SiO2/Sc2O3 deposited on SiO2/Si substrates by RF sputtering and thermal annealing at high temperature. The films were characterized by synchrotron radiation grazing incidence X-ray diffraction, cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and micro-photoluminescence measurements. The Er-Sc silicate phase Er x Sc2-xSi2O7 is the dominant film, and Er and Sc are homogeneously distributed after thermal treatment because of the excess of oxygen from SiO2 interlayers. The Er concentration of 6.7 × 1021 atoms/cm3 was achieved due to the presence of Sc that dilutes the Er concentration and generates concentration quenching. During silicate formation, the erbium diffusion coefficient in the silicate phase is estimated to be 1 × 10-15 cm2/s at 1,250°C. The dominant Er x Sc2 - xSi2O7 layer shows a room-temperature photoluminescence peak at 1,537 nm with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.6 nm. The peak emission shift compared to that of the Y-Er silicate (where Y and Er have almost the same ionic radii) and the narrow FWHM are due to the small ionic radii of Sc3+ which enhance the crystal field strength affecting the optical properties of Er3+ ions located at the well-defined lattice sites of the Sc silicate. The Er-Sc silicate with narrow FWHM opens a promising way to prepare photonic crystal light-emitting devices.
KeywordsRare-earth doping Photoluminescence Thin films
The realization of Si photonics requires a series of components, including continuous-wave (CW) coherent light sources, modulators, amplifiers, switches, detectors, and couplers. Great efforts have been made to fabricate these various components, and successes have been achieved to some degree: Modulators based on the electro-absorption effect [1–4] have been demonstrated, Si-based avalanche photodetectors with a 340-GHz gain bandwidth product have been realized , a nanophotonic switch has been made by IBM , and on-chip and off-chip couplers have also been demonstrated [7, 8]. Among these components, coherent light sources and amplifiers are the most challenging because of the lack of a Si-compatible high-gain material. Bulk Si is a very inefficient emitter because of its indirect bandgap. An alternative approach is to introduce rare-earth ions as impurities into Si . Erbium-doped materials are widely studied as active media in planar Si-compatible optical amplifiers [10, 11] owing to the radiative emission of erbium at 1.54 μm, which is a strategic wavelength for telecommunications [12–14].
However, obtaining room-temperature erbium luminescence from doped silicon is not easy, mainly because of the low solubility of erbium in bulk silicon, small emission cross section, and very strong non-radiative coupling between erbium ions and the silicon host. The time constant of the non-radiative transfer mechanisms is much shorter than that of the erbium luminescence (microseconds and milliseconds, respectively) [13, 15]. A promising solution could be the use of rare-earth (RE) compounds, which permit us to gradually insert Er ions inside a proper crystalline structure, by substituting RE ions with Er ions, and thus avoid their clusterization . Recently, Er silicates have been reported by many researchers as a possible alternative [17, 18] to demonstrate optical amplification. Er, a major constituent instead of a dopant, can provide optically active Er concentrations that exceed 1022 cm-3 . However, pure Er silicates are not suitable for 1.54-μm applications as the extremely high Er concentration leads to effects such as concentration quenching and cooperative up-conversion, which introduce strong non-radiative recombination paths for the 1.54 μm luminescence [19, 20]. Lo Savio et al. have shown that Y-Er disilicate (Y2-xEr x Si2O7) is a good host candidate since it affords a maximum solubility of 1022 cm-3, which is due to the same crystalline structure with very similar lattice parameters in the constituent materials (Er2Si2O7 and Y2Si2O7) and because both Er and Y atoms occupy the same atomic sites . Scandium ions (Sc3+), on the other hand, present a smaller size (ionic radius = 0.75 Å) compared to erbium (Er3+) (ionic radius = 0.881 Å). Generally, this can result in enhancing crystal field strength for Er dopants, silicates, and oxides [16, 22]. In fact, Fornasiero et al. synthesized single crystal of Er-doped Sc silicates using the Czochralski technique with the idea that Sc3+ ions can increase the Stark splitting of the thermally populated erbium ground state as well as of other electronic energy levels of the silicates and therefore reduce reabsorption losses . However, thin film growth of Er-Sc silicates on silicon wafer has not been established, and thus, the optical properties of the silicate have not been sufficiently characterized yet, compared with those of Er-Y silicates.
In this work, we have synthesized a polycrystalline Er-Sc silicate compound (Er x Sc2-xSi2O7) in which Er and Sc are homogeneously distributed using RF sputtering with multilayer Er2O3, Sc2O3, and SiO2 layers deposited on SiO2/Si (100) substrate and thermal annealing at high temperature. The diffusion coefficient of Er was determined after annealing at 1,250°C. The photoluminescence of the dominant phases of the Er-Sc silicate was reported and discussed.
Er-Sc multilayer thin films were grown by RF sputtering by alternating 15-nm-thick layers of Er2O3 and Sc2O3 separated by a 15-nm-thick SiO2 layer. These layers were deposited on 50-nm-thick Er2O3 on SiO2 (1.3 μm)/Si (100) substrate at room temperature. After deposition, the samples were annealed in O2 at 1,250°C for 1 h. The samples were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), using cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images obtained at 200 keV, and by synchrotron radiation grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) experiments that were performed on the as-grown and annealed samples at the BL24XU in SPring-8 (Hyogo, Japan) using an X-ray wavelength of 1.24 Å and an incidence angle of 1.0° . Photoluminescence (PL) measurements were performed using a laser at 1,527.6 nm with an excitation power of 125 mW at 4 and 300 K. The excitation laser was focused to a spot with a diameter of about 15 μm and an incident angle of 45° through an objective lens. The luminescence from the sample was collected perpendicularly with a different objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.40 . The PL spectra were detected using a 0.5-m spectrometer and cooled InGaAs detector [23, 25].
Results and discussion
After thermal treatment at 1,250°C in O2, we formed a unique layer with an average thickness of 102 nm as shown in Figure 2c. The SAED images show a single-crystal compound. The interplanar spacings are 1.30, 1.54, and 2.61 Å, corresponding respectively to (203), (33-2), and (220) planes, for Er2Si2O7. The annealing treatment at 1,250°C results in the intermixing between different layers with homogeneous concentration profiles of Er, Sc, Si, and O in depth (Figure 2c). Indeed, Er and Sc diffuse in the SiO2 layer. EDS measurements show that Er and Sc concentrations are 6.7 × 1021 and 1.4 × 1021 atoms/cm3, respectively, with the Er/Sc ratio of 4.5. This high concentration of Er incorporated into the Sc2O3 matrix is due to the presence of Sc that creates concentration quenching. From the GIXD and TEM analysis, we conclude that Er2Si2O7 is in the bottom and top layers before annealing and that the Er x Sc2-xSi2O7 phase is dominant after annealing at 1,250°C. In addition, it is considered that the high-temperature annealing at 1,250°C and long annealing time enhance the reaction of Er-O and Si-O precursors with the SiO2 interlayers, converting most of the Er2SiO5 to Er2Si2O7 . The existence of the Er x Sc2-xSiO5 phase after annealing determined by GIXD analysis may be due to size of the analyzed surface which is much bigger using an X-ray beam than a TEM electron beam. The surface morphology after deposition and annealing was analyzed by AFM. The AFM images in Figure 2e,f show a flat surface with no cracks after annealing up to 1,250°C. After deposition, the roughness value of approximately 2.7 nm was measured against that of 4.1 nm after annealing because of the increase of the grain size.
The crystal field strength parameters are defined by  , where is the crystal field parameters that affect the Stark levels of Er3+, which characterize the interaction between ligands and the central ions and include the radial integral of the wavefunction. The values of the crystal field strength parameters have been calculated for Er3+ doped in different matrices: Sc2O3 (5,300 cm-1), Y2O3 (2,700 cm-1), and Er2O3 (2,200 cm-1) [32, 33], and show clearly that the crystal field strength increases regularly with decreasing ionic radius of the RE host cation, which generates the Stark splitting energy levels. In our case, the 8-nm redshift is due to the presence of Sc ions, which increase the crystal field strength and thereby enhance the Stark splitting of the thermally populated Er energy levels (4I15/2 and 4I13/2 levels) as well as that of the other electronic energy levels.
In summary, a polycrystalline Er x Sc2-xSi2O7-dominant compound was fabricated using RF sputtering by alternating Er2O3 and Sc2O3 layers separated by a SiO2 layer and annealed in O2 gas. After high-temperature annealing at 1,250°C, the Er and Sc ions are distributed homogeneously in the layer. The erbium diffusion coefficient in the SiO2 at the annealing temperature was estimated to be 1 × 10-15 cm2/s. The Er-Sc silicate layer shows a sharp emission peak at room temperature centered at 1,537 nm as a result of the strong crystal field strength generated by the small ionic radii of Sc3+ ions. The Er-Sc silicate could be used as an efficient material for photonic devices.
We thank Dr. Shingo Takeda for his help in the synchrotron radiation experiments at beam line BL24XU in SPring-8. This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24360033.
- Liu J, Beals M, Pomerene A, Bernardis S, Sun R, Cheng J, Kimerling LC, Michel J: Waveguide-integrated, ultralow-energy GeSi electro-absorption modulators. Nat Photon 2008, 2: 433. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emboras A, Briggs RM, Najar A, Nambiar S, Delacour C, Grosse P, Augendre E, Fedeli JM, Salvo B, Atwater HA, Espiau de Lamaestre R: Efficient coupler between silicon photonic and metal-insulator-silicon-metal plasmonic waveguides. Appl Physics Lett 2012, 101(25):251117. 10.1063/1.4772941View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emboras A, Najar A, Nambiar S, Grosse P, Augendre E, Leroux C, Salvo B, Espiau de Lamaestre R: MNOS stack for reliable, low optical loss, Cu based CMOS plasmonic devices. Opt Express 2012, 20(13):13612. 10.1364/OE.20.013612View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu Q, Schmidt B, Pradhan S, Lipson M: Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator. Nature 2005, 435: 325. 10.1038/nature03569View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang Y, Liu HD, Morse M, Paniccia MJ, Zadka M, Litski S, Sarid G, Pauchard A, Kuo YH, Chen HW, Sfar Zaoui W, Bowers JE, Beling A, McIntosh DC, Zheng X, Campbell JC: Monolithic germanium/silicon avalanche photodiodes with 340 GHz gain-bandwidth product. Nat Photon 2008, 3: 59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vlasov Y, Green WMJ, Xia F: High-throughput silicon nanophotonic deflection switch for on-chip optical networks. Nat Photon 2008, 2: 242. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McNab SJ, Moll N, Vlasov YA: Ultra-low loss photonic integrated circuit with membrane-type photonic crystal waveguides. Opt Express 2003, 11: 2927. 10.1364/OE.11.002927View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Analui B, Guckenberger D, Kucharski D, Narasimha A: A fully integrated 20-Gb/s optoelectronic transceiver implemented in a standard 0.13-μm CMOS SOI technology. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 2006, 41: 2945.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenyon AJ: Erbium in silicon. Semicond Sci Technol 2005, 20: R65. 10.1088/0268-1242/20/12/R02View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Najar A, Charrier J, Ajlani H, Lorrain N, Haesaert S, Oueslati M, Haji L: Optical gain at 1.53 μm in Er3+–Yb3+ co-doped porous silicon waveguides. Mater Sci Eng B 2007, 146(1):260.Google Scholar
- Lee J, Shin JH, Park N: Optical gain at 1.5 μm in nanocrystal Si-sensitized Er-doped silica waveguide using top-pumping 470 nm LEDs. J Lightwave Technol 2005, 23(1):19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Najar A, Ajlani H, Charrier J, Lorrain N, Haesaert S, Oueslati M, Haji L: Optical study of erbium-doped-porous silicon based planar waveguides. Physica B 2007, 396(1):145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polman A: Erbium implanted thin film photonic materials. J Appl Phys 1997, 82(1):1. 10.1063/1.366265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Najar A, Lorrain N, Ajlani H, Charrier J, Oueslati M, Haji L: Er3+ doping conditions of planar porous silicon waveguides. Appl Surf Sci 2009, 256(3):581. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.08.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Palm J, Gan F, Zheng B, Michel J, Kimerling LC: Electroluminescence of erbium-doped silicon. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 17603. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17603View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fornasiero L, Petermann K, Heumann E, Huber G: Spectroscopic properties and laser emission of Er3+ in scandium silicates near 1.5 μm. Opt Mater 1998, 10: 9. 10.1016/S0925-3467(97)00148-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suh K, Shin JH, Seo SJ, Bae BS: Large-scale fabrication of single-phase Er2SiO5 nanocrystal aggregates using Si nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89(22):223102. 10.1063/1.2393162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang XJ, Nakajima T, Isshiki H, Kimura T: Fabrication and characterization of Er silicates on SiO2/Si substrates. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95(4):041906. 10.1063/1.3192407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miritello M, Lo Savio R, Iacona F, Franzó G, Irrera A, Piro AM, Bongiorno C, Priolo F: Efficient luminescence and energy transfer in erbium silicate thin films. Adv Mater 2007, 19(12):1582. 10.1002/adma.200601692View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suh K, Shin HJ, Seo SJ, Bae BS: Er3+ luminescence and cooperative upconversion in ErxY2-xSiO5 nanocrystal aggregates fabricated using Si nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 121910. 10.1063/1.2890414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lo Savio R, Miritello M, Shakoor A, Cardile P, Welna K, Andreani LC, Gerace D, Krauss TF, O'Faolain L, Priolo F, Galli M: Enhanced 1.54 μm emission in Y-Er disilicate thin films on silicon photonic crystal cavities. Opt Express 2013, 21(8):10278. 10.1364/OE.21.010278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stanek CR, McClennan KJ, Uberuaga BP, Sickafus KE: Determining the site preference of trivalent dopants in bixbyite sesquioxides by atomic-scale simulations. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 134101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michael CP, Yuen HB, Sabnis VA, Johnson TJ, Sewell R, Smith R, Jamora A, Clark A, Semans S, Stanckovic SPB, Painter O: Growth, processing, and optical properties of epitaxial Er2O3 on silicon. Opt Express 2008, 16: 19649. 10.1364/OE.16.019649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tawara T, Omi H, Hozumi T, Kaji R, Adachi S, Gotoh H, Sogawa T: Population dynamics in epitaxial Er2O3 thin films grown on Si (111). Appl Phys Lett 2013, 102: 241918. 10.1063/1.4812294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Omi H, Tawara T: Energy transfers between Er3+ ions located at the two crystalographic sites of Er2O3 grown on Si(111). Jap J Appl Phys 2012, 51: 02BG07. 10.7567/JJAP.51.02BG07View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu YW, Julsgaard B, Christian Petersen M, Skougaard Jensen RV, Garm Pedersen T, Pedersen K, Larsen NA: Erbium diffusion in silicon dioxide. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 141903. 10.1063/1.3497076View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talbot E, Larde R, Pareige P, Khomenkova L, Hijazi K, Gourbilleau F: Nanoscale evidence of erbium clustering in Er-doped silicon-rich silica. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 39. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin JH, Lee M: Reducing optical losses and energy-transfer upconversion in ErxY2-xSiO5 waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technol Letters 1801, 2013: 25.Google Scholar
- Miritello M, Cardile P, Lo Savio R, Priolo F: Energy transfer and enhanced 1.54 μm emission in erbium-ytterbium disilicate thin films. Optics Express 2011, 19(21):20761. 10.1364/OE.19.020761View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Omi H, Tawara T, Tateishi M: Real-time synchrotoron radiation X-ray diffraction and abnormal temperature dependence of photoluminescence from erbium silicates on SiO2/Si substrates. AIP Adv 2012, 2(1):012141. 10.1063/1.3687419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auzel F, Malta O: A scalar crystal field strength parameter for rare-earth ions: meaning and usefulness. J Phys 1983, 44: 201. 10.1051/jphys:01983004402020100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Antic-Fidancev E, Holsa J, Lastusaari M: Crystal field strength in C-type cubic rare earth oxides. J Alloys Compd 2002, 341: 82–86. 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00073-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trabelsi I, Maâlej R, Dammak M, Lupei A, Kamoun M: Crystal field analysis of Er3+ in Sc2O3 transparent ceramics. J Lumin 2010, 130: 927–931. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.02.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.