Synthesis and self-assembly behavior of a biodegradable and sustainable soybean oil-based copolymer nanomicelle
© Bao et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 27 July 2014
Accepted: 6 August 2014
Published: 12 August 2014
Herein, we report a novel amphiphilic biodegradable and sustainable soybean oil-based copolymer (SBC) prepared by grafting hydrophilic and biocompatible hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) polymeric segments onto the natural hydrophobic soybean oil chains. FTIR, H1-NMR, and GPC measurements have been used to investigate the molecular structure of the obtained SBC macromolecules. Self-assembly behaviors of the prepared SBC in aqueous solution have also been extensively evaluated by fluorescence spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The prepared SBC nanocarrier with the size range of 40 to 80 nm has a potential application in the biomedical field.
Many efforts have been done to develop biodegradable biomaterials during the past 2 decades due to their large potential application in biomedical fields of tissue engineering, gene therapy, regenerative medicine, controlled drug delivery, etc.[1–3]. There are many factors to choose biodegradable rather than biostable materials for biomedical applications. The main driving forces are the long-term biocompatibility issues with many of the existing permanent implants and many levels of ethical and technical issues associated with revision surgeries. The recent research interest about biomaterials focuses on designation and development of novel biodegradable polymers and related derivates, including polyesters[5–7], polylactides, polycaprolactones[9–11], poly(ester amide)s[12, 13], polyanhydrides[14–16], polyurethanes[17–20], and so on. Unfortunately, most of the reported main raw materials used to synthesize biodegradable polymers are unsustainable petroleum-based compounds. As the global demand for petroleum-based plastics continues to increase, unstable crude oil price and related environmental problems have triggered a search for replacing these non-biodegradable and unsustainable plastics. Development and application of biodegradable and sustainable plant-based products such as natural oils may be the most promising choice to solve these problems. For example, Thamae et al. have developed a biodegradable corn stover filled polyethylene biomaterials. The effect of the corn stover size and the content and the morphology of the filler on the structure and mechanical properties of the obtained biocomposites have been extensively evaluated. Recently, our group has also developed a novel nontoxic, biodegradable, and ion-conductive plasticizer based on natural citric acid for soft poly(vinyl chloride) composites.
Soybean oil is one of the most widely available biodegradable and sustainable edible oils. From the angle of the chemical structure, soybean oil is a triglyceride with two dominant fatty acid residues, linoleic acid and oleic acid, and an average number of double bonds per molecule of 4.6. The average molecular weight of soybean oil is about 874, and it contains 51% of linoleic acid, 25% of oleic acid, 11% of palmitic acid, 9% of linolenic acid, and 4% of stearic acid residues. The existence of the unsaturated double bonds in soybean oil molecules supplies opportunities for designing and modifying of soybean oil-based biodegradable polymers. Can et al. have successfully prepared a rigid soybean oil-based thermosetting copolymer by a free radical copolymerization method. Biomaterials based on linseed oil monoglyceride maleates and modified acrylated epoxidized soybean oil with styrene have also been developed by Mosiewicki and Colak, respectively. Recently, Cakmakli et al. have reported the biocompatibility and the bacterial adhesion of a soybean oil-g-methyl methacrylate and butyl methacrylate copolymer for biomedical applications.
Synthesis of the soybean oil-based copolymer
The soybean oil-based copolymer (SBC) was prepared by a two-step batch grafting polymerization due to the fact that batch polymerization was usually facilitated to eliminate the heat of the polymerization and obtain polymers with uniform properties. In this procedure, 60 g soybean oil, 1 g methyl methacrylate (MMA), 2.5 g butyl acrylate (BA), 0.5 g hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA), 1 g benzoyl peroxide (BPO), and 15 g ethyl acetate (EA) were first added into a flask with stirring at 75°C. The grafting polymerization reaction was maintained for 30 min. Four grams of BPO was quickly added into a mixed solution composed of 9 g MMA, 22.5 g BA, 4.5 g HEA, and 5 g EA. The mixture was then added into the flask dropwise for 3 h, and the reaction was maintained at 75°C for 7 h. The resulting SBC solution was then poured into hexane under stirring to remove unreacted soybean oil molecules, acrylate monomers, and related oligomers. The obtained SBC slurry was further dissolved into chloroform to get a solution with the SBC concentration of 50 mg/mL. Methanol was then added into the solution dropwise to further purify the grafted SBC macromolecules taking account of the different solubilities of SBC in chloroform and methanol. The obtained precipitation was dried under vacuum at 60°C overnight, and the target SBC was obtained.
Self-assembly of the SBC in aqueous solution
To investigate the self-assembly behaviors and the morphology of the prepared SBC and the SBC nanomicelles, the purified SBC macromolecules were self-assembled in water and the corresponding procedures were listed as below. The SBC (1 wt.%) were first dissolved into dimethylacetamide (DMAc). Subsequently, deionized water was added dropwise under ultrasonification to avoid the precipitation of the SBC, and a 2 mg/mL SBC emulsion was obtained. The resulting emulsion was then transferred to dialysis tubes (MWCO-3500) and dialyzed against deionized water for 3 days to thoroughly remove the used DMAc. The obtained emulsion was further diluted by deionized water to yield a series of sample solution varying in the SBC concentration from 10-4 to 1 mg/mL.
Un-polymerized soybean oil and the synthesized SBC were characterized by using a Nicolet-560 FTIR spectrometer with a resolution setting of 4 cm-1. The scanning range was altered from 400 to 4,000 cm-1. H1-NMR (400 MHz) spectrum of both soybean oil and the SBC was recorded on a Bruker AV-II spectrometer, using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 as the solvent. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) test of the synthesized SBC was performed by using an HLC-8320 GPC (Japan) at 25°C. Tetrahydrofuran and polystyrene with a narrow molecular weight distribution were used as the eluent and the reference, respectively. The flow speed of the solution was 1 mL/min. Steady-state fluorescence spectra of the SBC micelles were obtained using an F-7000 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with a bandwidth of 2.5 nm and λem of 373 nm. Pyrene was used as the probe, and the final pyrene concentration was about 5 × 10-7 M. The morphology of the prepared SBC micelles was observed using a JEOL JEM-2100 electron microscope (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
Results and discussion
GPC results of the prepared SBC
M w (g mol-1)
D(M w /M n )
Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is an important parameter to characterize the thermodynamic stability of micellar system upon dilution in nanomicelles in vivo. The ratio of I339.4/I335.6 in the excitation spectra is usually used to determine the CMC of amphiphilic molecules. The influence of the SBC concentration in aqueous solution on the ratio of I339.4/I335.6 is shown in Figure 4b. The ratio of I339.4/I335.6 is found to dramatically increase from 0.8 to 1.38 with the enhancement of the SBC concentration from 1 × 10-4 to 4.9 × 10-2 mg/mL. It is almost unchanged with further increasing the SBC concentration from 4.9 × 10-2 to 1 mg/mL. Consequently, a CMC value of 4.57 × 10-4 mg/mL can be obtained from the intersection of the two tangent lines shown in Figure 4b.
Similarly, a typical ratio of I3/I1 (about I383/I373) of pyrene probe in emission spectra is also usually used to determine the CMC value of micelles. It is shown in Figure 5b, the ratio of I3/I1 rapidly decreases from 1.67 to 1.21 when the SBC concentration increases from 1 × 10-4 to 1 × 10-3 mg/mL. It only fluctuates near 1.18 with further increasing the SBC concentration from 1 × 10-3 to 1 mg/mL, revealing the un-sensitivity of the I3/I1 ratio at high SBC concentrations. A CMC value of 1.23 × 10-4 mg/mL (CMC2) can be also obtained from Figure 5b, which is slightly lower than the CMC1 observed from the excitation spectra. Consequently, the CMC value of the prepared SBC micelles is ranged from 1.23 × 10-4 to 4.57 × 10-4 mg/mL. The detected CMC value is much lower than those reported for well-known linear and nonlinear block copolymers, such as 4.1 × 10-2, 6.46 × 10-2, and 1.2 × 10-3 for conventional biodegradable thermogelling poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(ϵ-caprolactone) (PEG/PCL) diblock, branched PCL/PEG copolymers, and PCL/PEG/PCL triblock, respectively. It is as well lower than that (8.5 × 10-4 mg/mL) of recent reported biodegradable polyurethane micelles developed in our institute. Such a low CMC value reveals that there is a strong tendency of the SBC molecules toward micelle formation in water, attributing to the good flexibility and the extraordinary surfactant features of the prepared SBC macromolecules. The low CMC value also indicates that the SBC micelles are highly thermodynamic stable, and that both the size and the polydispersity index of the SBC micelles are little changed with dilution.
In summary, a new biodegradable and nontoxic nanocarrier for potential drug delivery has been successfully prepared by grafting hydrophilic HEA polymeric segments onto the natural hydrophobic soybean chains. Fluorescence spectra studies show that the prepared SBC macromolecules can easily self-assemble to form core-shell nanoparticles in aqueous solution, and that the CMC of the prepared SBC is only 4.57 × 10-4 mg/mL, which is much lower than those of well-known biodegradable biomedical nanocarriers. TEM results indicate that the prepared SBC micelles are composed of a large amount of nanocarriers with the size range of 40 to 80 nm, and that the thickness of the SBC macromolecular monolayer each nanocarrier is about 1/10 of the diameter of the detected SBC micelle.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21204076/B040307).
- Vert M: Aliphatic polyesters: great degradable polymers that cannot do everything. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6: 538–546.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torchilin VP: Structure and design of polymeric surfactant-based drug delivery systems. J Control Release 2001, 73: 137–172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mora-Huertas CE, Fessi H, Elaissari A: Polymer-based nanocapsules drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2010, 385: 113–142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nair LS, Laurencin CT: Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32: 762–798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goepferich A: Polymer bulk erosion. Macromolecules 1997, 30: 2598–2604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Middleton JC, Tipton AJ: Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000, 21: 2335–2346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okada M: Chemical synthesis of biodegradable polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2002, 27: 87–133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper JA, Lu HH, Ko FK, Freeman JW, Laurencin CT: Fiber-based tissue-engineering scaffold for ligament replacement: design considerations and in vitro evaluation. Biomaterials 2005, 26: 1523–1532.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sinha VR, Bansal K, Kaushik K, Kumria R, Trehan A: Poly-ϵ-caprolactone microspheres and nanospheres: an overview. Int J Pharm 2004, 278: 1–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mondrinos MJ, Dembzynski R, Lu L, Byrapogu VKC, Wootton DM, Lelkes PI, Zhou J: Porogen-based solid freeform fabrication of polycaprolactone calcium phosphate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27: 4399–4408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shor L, Guceri S, Wen XJ, Gandhi M, Sun W: Fabrication of three dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro. Biomaterials 2007, 28: 5291–5297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Priscilla AML, van Luyn MJA, Chiellini F, Brouwer LA, Velthoen IW, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J: Biocompatibility and degradation of aliphatic segmented poly(ester amide)s: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 76: 699–710.Google Scholar
- Deschamps AA, van Apeldoorn AA, de Bruijin JD, Grijpma DW, Feijen J: Poly(ether ester amide)s for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2003, 24: 2643–2652.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gopferich A, Tessmar J: Polyanhydride degradation and erosion. Adv Drug Deliver Res 2002, 54: 911–931.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li LC, Deng J, Stephens D: Polyanhydride implant for antibiotic delivery from the bench to the clinic. Adv Drug Deliver Res 2002, 54: 963–986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar N, Langer RS, Domb AJ: Polyanhydrides: an overview. Adv Drug Deliver Res 2002, 54: 889–910.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JY, Beckman EJ, Piesco NP, Agrawal S: A new peptide-based urethane polymer: synthesis, biodegradation, and potential to support cell growth in vitro. Biomaterials 2000, 21: 1247–1258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Storey RF, Wiggins JS, Puckett AD: Hydrolyzable poly(ester-urethane) networks from L-lysine diisocyanate and D, L-lactide/e-caprolactone homo and copolyester triols. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 1994, 32: 2342–2345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonzani IC, Adhikari R, Houshyar S, Mayadunne R, Gunatillake P, Stevens MM: Synthesis of two component injectable polyurethane for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007, 28: 423–433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JY, Doll BA, Beckman EJ, Hollinger JO: Three dimensional biocompatible ascorbic acid containing scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003, 9: 1143–1157.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thamae T, Marien R, Chong L, Wu C, Baillie C: Developing and characterizing new materials based on waste plastic and agro-fibre. J Mater Sci 2008, 43: 4057–4068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JL, Che RS, Yang WQ, Lei JX: Biodegradable antistatic plasticizer based on citrate electrolyte doped with alkali metal salt and its poly(vinyl chloride) composites. Polym Int 2011, 60: 344–352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andjelkovic DD, Valverde M, Henna P, Li FK, Larock RC: Novel thermosets prepared by cationic copolymerization of various vegetable oils: synthesis and their structure property relationships. Polymer 2005, 46: 9674–9685.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Can E, Kusefoglu S, Wool RP: Rigid thermosetting liquid molding resins from renewable resources. I. synthesis and polymerization of soy oil monoglyceride maleates. J Appl Polym Sci 2001, 81: 69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mosiewicki M, Aranguren MI, Borrajo J: Mechanical properties of linseed oil monoglyceride maleate/styrene copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci 2005, 97: 825–836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colak S, Kusefoglu SH: Synthesis and interfacial properties of aminosilane derivative of acrylated epoxidized soybean oil. J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 104: 2244–2253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cakmakli B, Hazer B, Tekin IO, Comert FB: Synthesis and characterization of polymeric soybean oil-g-methyl methacrylate (and n-butyl methacrylate) graft copolymers: biocompatibility and bacterial adhesion. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6: 1750–1758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bian LC, Bao LX, Wang JL, Lei JX: In situ preparation of monodispersed Ag/polyaniline/Fe3O4 nanoparticles via heterogeneous nucleation. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 309–315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ding MM, Zhou LJ, Fu XT, Tan H, Li JH, Fu Q: Biodegradable gemini multiblock poly (ϵ-caprolactone urethane)s toward controllable micellization. Soft Matter 2010, 6: 2087–2092.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilhelm M, Zhao C, Wang Y, Xu R, Winnik MA: Poly(styrene-ethylene oxide) block copolymer micelle formation in water: a fluorescence probe study. Macromolecules 1991, 24: 1033–1040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astafieva I, Zhong XF, Eisenberg A: Critical micellization phenomena in block polyelectrolyte solutions. Macromolecules 1993, 26: 7339–7352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allen C, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A: Nano-engineering block copolymer aggregates for drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1999, 16: 3–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Zeng F, Allen C: In vivo fate of unimers and micelles of a poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(caprolactone) copolymer in mice following intravenous administration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007, 65: 309–319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zou T, Li S, Zhang X, Wu X, Cheng S, Zhou R: Synthesis and characterization of a biodegradable amphiphilic copolymer based on branched poly(ϵ-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol). J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 2007, 45: 5256–5265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piao L, Dai Z, Deng M, Chen X, Jing X: Synthesis and characterization of PCL/PEG/PCL triblock copolymers by using calcium catalyst. Polymer 2003, 44: 2025–2031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.