Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Evolution of the sensitized Er3+ emission by silicon nanoclusters and luminescence centers in silicon-rich silica

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:456

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-456

  • Received: 18 May 2014
  • Accepted: 27 August 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

The structural and optical properties of erbium-doped silicon-rich silica samples containing different Si concentrations are studied. Intense photoluminescence (PL) from luminescence centers (LCs) and silicon nanoclusters (Si NCs), which evolves with annealing temperatures, is obtained. By modulating the silicon concentrations in samples, the main sensitizers of Er3+ ions can be tuned from Si NCs to LCs. Optimum Er3+ PL, with an enhancement of more than two, is obtained in the samples with a medium Si concentration, where the sensitization from Si NCs and LCs coexists.

Keywords

  • Luminescence centers
  • Silicon nanoclusters
  • Erbium
  • Energy transfer
  • Silicon-rich oxide
  • Photoluminescence

Background

There has been a growing interest in developing Si-compatible light sources for photonic applications [1]. A silicon-rich oxide (SRO) matrix embedded with silicon nanoclusters (Si NCs) provides a promising approach, since the quantum confinement effect of Si NCs can overcome the inability of Si bulk with indirect bandgap and thus significantly promote the luminescence efficiency. By utilizing Si NCs, optical gain [25] and room temperature electroluminescence [610] have been successively demonstrated in the last decades. Moreover, SRO acts as an efficient host matrix for rare-earth ions such as Nd3+[11], Tb3+[12], and Er3+[13]. Among these ions, the Er3+ ion has attracted much research interest [1429], as the 1.54-μm luminescence of Er3+ lies in the third telecom window. The Er3+ ions in SRO, when located in close proximity to Si NCs, would benefit from energy transfer from Si NCs and subsequently be excited non-resonantly [13, 14]. The effective excitation cross section of Si NC-sensitized Er could be several orders of magnitude larger than that of resonantly pumped Er [14], which results from the large and spectrally broad absorption cross section of Si NCs in the entire visible range. Besides, luminescence centers (LCs) in SRO have also been demonstrated to be efficient sensitizers for Er3+ ions [18, 19]. Thus, the luminescence of Er3+ ions can be significantly improved via sensitization of Si NCs or LCs in SRO.

In spite of the advantageous sensitization effect, achieving optical gain from Er3+ in SRO has been proved to be a difficult task. This is mainly due to the low fraction of optically active Er3+ ions coupled to Si NCs [20, 21]. It has been demonstrated that the effective interaction length between Er3+ and Si NCs would not exceed 0.5 nm, which means that only the Er3+ ions in close proximity to Si NCs could be sensitized [21]. Thus, the relatively low density of Si NCs is believed to be a limitation on achieving gain in such a system. Compared with Si NCs, LCs with high density could be obtained in SRO due to their atomic size scale, and sensitization via LCs is believed to improve the Er3+ luminescence. Moreover, some authors attributed the dominant Er sensitization mechanism in Er-doped SRO (SROEr) to LC-mediated excitation [18]. However, this conclusion is under debate, and the sensitization of Si NCs on Er3+ ions cannot be totally excluded. In fact, it is necessary to take advantage of all the sensitizers and facilitate their coupling with Er3+ ions for the optimization of Er3+ luminescence.

In this work, Er-doped SRO films with different Si concentrations were prepared by electron beam evaporation (EBE), and the structural and optical properties were studied. We try to clarify the effect of energy transfer from Si NCs or LCs to the Er3+ ions and subsequently optimize the Er3+ luminescence.

Methods

Er-doped SRO films with thicknesses of approximately 400 nm were prepared on p-type <100 > silicon substrates by EBE. Three different targets were used: a SiO and Er2O3 mixed target with Er atomic concentration of approximately 20 at.% was labelled ‘target I’, and target I baked at 80°C in air for 24 and 48 h was labelled ‘target II’ and ‘target III’. Consequently, samples prepared from targets I, II, and III are labelled samples I, II, and III, respectively. The details of the deposition parameters can be found in [19]. Rutherford backscattering spectra were collected using 2.02 MeV 4He ion beams at a scattering angle of 165° to determine the atomic compositions of the as-deposited (A.D.) films. The Er concentration was approximately 3 × 1019 at./cm3 in all the samples, and the Si atomic concentration was 38.5, 37.0, and 35.7 at.% in samples I, II, and III, respectively. After deposition, the samples were placed in a quartz furnace and annealed in flowing N2 at temperatures in the range of 700 to 1,150°C for 30 min to form the different sensitizers (LCs and/or Si NCs). The structural characteristics of the annealed samples were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai F20G2, FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA). Continuous wavelength photoluminescence (PL) measurements were carried out at room temperature using a 325-nm line of a He-Cd laser as the excitation light source. PL spectra were recorded using a charge-coupled device (PIXIS: 100BR, Princeton Instruments, Trenton, USA) in the visible range and a photomultiplier tube (PMT, Hamamatsu R5509, Iwata City, Japan) in the infrared range. The PL decay traces of the matrices were excited by a 405-nm picosecond laser diode and measured by a multichannel photon counting system (Edinburg Instruments Ltd., Livingston, UK). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) investigations were carried out under the transmission mode and vacuum condition using a Bruker IFS 66 V/S FTIR spectroscope (Bruker BioSpin AG Ltd., Beijing, China).

Results and discussion

The structural evolution of sample I with the annealing process was investigated by measuring the FTIR spectra, as shown in Figure 1. The main peak in the range from 1,065 to 1,088 cm−1 is ascribed to the Si-O-Si stretching mode [30]. With the increase of annealing temperatures, the intensity of the main peak gradually increases and its peak position shifts to higher wavenumbers, which indicates the phase separation in the SROEr films [31]. In addition, each spectrum can be resolved into three bands with a Gaussian fitting procedure, which are ascribed to the Si-O-Si bulk stretching mode (sub-peak A), the Si-O-Si surface stretching mode (sub-peak B), and the Si = O symmetric stretching mode (sub-peak C) [32]. The ratio of the Si = O symmetric stretching mode in the SROEr films is shown in the inset of Figure 1, and it decreases with the increase of the annealing temperatures, due to the decomposition of the Si = O bonds by Er ions during thermal treatments [19].
Figure 1
Figure 1

FTIR spectra and the percentage of Si = O symmetric stretching mode for the SROEr-I films. FTIR spectra of the SROEr-I films annealed at different temperatures. The spectrum of the as-deposited sample is denoted by empty squares, and that of the annealed samples are denoted by the colored lines. A typical fitting of the FTIR spectra is provided for the A.D. sample (the fitting data are denoted by dash-dot line). The sub-peaks A, B, and C represent the components from Si-O-Si bulk, Si-O-Si surface, and Si = O symmetric stretching modes, respectively. The inset shows the ratio of Si = O symmetric stretching mode for the SROEr-I films with different annealing temperatures.

Figure 2 shows the matrix-related PL spectra measured from sample I with different thermal treatment processes. Gaussian fittings were applied to these spectra to identify the origin of PL. In the PL spectrum from the as-deposited specimen, two PL bands can be resolved. The PL band with a peak at 2.8 eV originates from weak oxygen bonds (WOBs) [33], and the one with a peak at 2.3 eV originates from Si = O states [19, 34]. This is consistent with the results from sample III, as we have studied in [19]. However, the evolution of the PL spectra from sample I with different thermal treatments differs from that of sample III. After annealed at 700°C in N2 for 30 min, the PL from WOBs in sample I diminishes while the intensity of PL from Si = O states remains almost constant. Indeed, PL from Si = O states is also unstable during thermal treatments and would disappear after annealed at 900°C, where a weak PL band from non-bridging oxygen hole centers (NBOHCs) arises [35]. When the annealing temperature further increases to 1,000°C, a new PL band peaked at approximately 1.6 eV arises. Stretched exponential fittings of the decay traces have been applied, in the form of I(t) = I0exp[-(t/τ) β ], where τ is the PL decay time and 0 ≤ β ≤ 1 is the dispersion exponent. The lifetime of the PL peak at 1.6 eV is about 5 μs, much longer than that of the PL from LCs. Hence, this PL band is considered to originate from Si NCs. Finally, the PL from LCs would disappear, and there is only a PL band from Si NCs in the 1,150°C annealed specimen.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Matrix-related PL spectra of the SROEr-I films annealed at different temperatures. PL spectra of the SROEr-I matrix annealed at different temperatures: (a) as-deposited, (b) 700°C, (c) 900°C, (d) 1,000°C, and (e) 1,150°C. The experimental data are denoted by black lines, and the fitting data of the general and the divided peaks are denoted by the red and green lines, respectively. All the films were excited by the 325-nm line of the He-Cd laser.

Figure 3 shows the integrated PL intensity (ITPL) of SROEr-I matrix and that of Er3+ ions (right-hand scale) with different annealing temperatures. In the specimens annealed below 800°C, the PL from Er3+ is nearly indistinguishable, though strong PL from LCs (WOBs and Si = O states) can be observed. This suggests that most of the Er3+ ions in the low-temperature annealed specimens may be optically inactive and thus could not be sensitized by LCs (WOBs and Si = O states); in other words, high-temperature annealing is required to activate Er3+ ions. PL from Er3+ ions could only be clearly observed in the specimens annealed above 900°C, and its intensity increases by a factor of 12 with the annealing temperatures until 1,100°C, followed with a sudden drop at 1,150°C. Meantime, the emission decay time for Er3+ increases continuously by a factor of 4, from 68 to 287 μs, with the annealing temperature until 1,100°C and it finally reaches 415 μs at 1,150°C. The evolution of the Er3+ PL intensity could partially but not solely be explained by the increase of PL decay times. In fact, the evolution of ITPL from Er3+ ions with annealing temperatures shows a similar trend to that from the SROEr matrix in the range of 900 to 1,150°C, and the overlap between the two spectra indicates the energy transfer from the matrix to the Er3+ ions. By carefully studying the matrix-related PL, energy transfer from NBOHCs to Er3+ ions is excluded due to their gradual decrease and eventual absence during high-temperature annealing (900 to 1,150°C), which is in contrast to the evolution of ITPL from Er3+ ions. Therefore, Si NCs are believed to be the main sensitizers for Er3+ ions in the high-temperature annealed SROEr-I films. Indeed, the PL excitation (PLE) spectrum of Er3+ in the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr-I film shows similar wavelength dependence to that of Si NCs (as shown in Figure 4), confirming our hypothesis. The degradation of ITPL from Er3+ ions and matrix in the 1,150°C-annealed specimen is ascribed to the growth and coalescence of Si NCs, as shown in the inset of Figure 3. Coalescent microstructures of Si NCs, which would reduce the density of sensitizers and limit the non-phonon recombination probability in Si NCs, have been demonstrated to be detrimental for the luminescence of Si NCs and Er3+ ions [22, 36].
Figure 3
Figure 3

ITPL of the SROEr-I matrix and Er 3+ ions, and HRTEM image of the SROEr-I films. The evolution of SROEr-I matrix-related ITPL (left-hand scale) and that of Er-related ITPL (right-hand scale) with annealing temperatures. All the films were excited by the 325-nm line of the He-Cd laser. The inset shows the HRTEM image of coalescent Si NCs in the 1,150°C-annealed SROEr-I film.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Normalized PL excitation spectra for the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr-I film. Normalized PL excitation spectra of Si NCs (measured at 1.6 eV) and Er3+ ions (measured at 0.8 eV) for the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr-I film.

Figure 5 shows the matrix-related PL spectra measured from the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr films with different Si concentrations. Two PL bands can be resolved from the PL spectra: one peaked at approximately 1.6 eV, which originates from Si NCs; and the other peaked at approximately 2.3 eV, which originates from Si = O states, as described in [19]. In sample I with the highest Si concentration, PL from Si NCs dominates, while there is only PL from LCs in sample III with the lowest Si concentration. In sample II with a medium Si concentration, PL from Si NCs and LCs coexists and has comparable intensities. Remarkably, matrix-related PL spectra from SROEr films could be modulated by changing the Si concentrations, and this phenomenon deserves a special discussion. Si = O states, embedded in amorphous SROEr network or at the surface of Si NCs, act as efficient light emitters, and their photon absorption would be facilitated by the introduction of Si NCs [19]. However, growth and coalescence of Si NCs in samples with high Si concentrations would deplete the network where Si = O states are embedded and consequentially reduce the density of Si = O states [37]. Besides, local stress induced by agglomeration of Si NCs could dynamically destroy Si = O bonds and it is more severe in samples with higher Si concentrations [38]. Hence, we consider that the modulation of matrix-related PL originates from the evolution of microstructures with Si concentration in SROEr films.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Matrix-related PL spectra of the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr films with different Si concentrations. Matrix-related PL spectra of samples with different Si concentrations: (a) SROEr-I, 38.5 at.%, (b) SROEr-II, 37.0 at.%, and (c) SROEr-III, 35.7 at.%. All the films were excited by the 325-nm line of the He-Cd laser.

Meanwhile, sensitization mechanism of Er3+ ions in SROEr films evolves with the Si concentrations as a result of the modulation of matrix-related PL. In sample I, Si NCs play the dominant role in sensitizing Er3+ ions, and in sample III, LCs would take the place of Si NCs [19]. When it comes to sample II, it is reasonable to expect that both mechanisms would take place and may compete with each other. Due to the atomic size scale, LCs with high density could be obtained and are most often considered as sensitizers more promising than Si NCs. It is hence expected that the stronger PL from LCs is achieved, the more effective sensitization of Er3+ ions will be acquired. However, our data show that this is not so straightforward. The PL spectra of Er3+ ions from the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr films with different Si concentrations are presented in Figure 6. It is shown that Er3+ PL from sample III is stronger than that from sample I, indicating that LCs do be effective sensitizers for Er3+ ions. However, in spite of the relatively weak LC-related PL, Er-related PL in sample II is much stronger than that in sample III. This confirms our hypothesis that both mechanisms of sensitization via Si NCs and LCs take place in sample II. Moreover, it suggests that not only the density of sensitizers is a limitation for Er3+ luminescence, but also the coupling between sensitizers and Er3+ ions is important. According to Förster's theory [39, 40], the energy transfer probability depends on the distance between sensitizers and Er3+ ions. The coupling between sensitizers and Er3+ ions would evolve with the modulation of microstructures for samples with different Si concentrations, and the optimization is expected for sample II with a medium Si concentration.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Er-related PL spectra for the SROEr films with different Si concentrations. PL spectra of Er3+ for the 1,100°C-annealed SROEr films with different Si concentrations. All the films were excited by the 325-nm line of the He-Cd laser.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we studied the modulation on the sensitization mechanism of Er3+ ions as well as the matrix-related luminescence by the composition evolution of SROEr films. Formation of LCs and Si NCs is found to depend on the Si concentrations: growth and coalescence of Si NCs are promoted with the increase of Si concentrations, depleting the network where LCs are embedded and quenching the LC-related PL. Subsequently, the sensitization mechanism of Er3+ ions evolves with the modulation of microstructures. Si NCs act as main sensitizers of Er3+ ions in samples with high Si concentrations, and LCs take their place in samples with low Si concentrations, while the sensitization mechanisms coexist in samples with medium Si concentrations. An optimum Er3+ PL with an enhancement of more than two was obtained for the sample with medium Si concentrations, where the coupling between Er3+ ions and sensitizers (Si NCs and LCs) was maximized.

Abbreviations

A.D.: 

as-deposited

EBE: 

electron beam evaporation

FTIR: 

Fourier transform infrared

ITPL: 

integrated PL intensity

LCs: 

luminescence centers

NBOHCs: 

non-bridging oxygen hole centers

PL: 

photoluminescence

PLE: 

photoluminescence excitation

PMT: 

photomultiplier tube

Si NCs: 

silicon nanoclusters

SRO: 

silicon-rich oxide

SROEr: 

erbium-doped silicon-rich oxide

TEM: 

transmission electron microscopy

WOBs: 

weak oxygen bonds.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Program 973 (no. 2013CB632102), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.61176117), and Innovation Team Project of Zhejiang Province (no. 2009R5005).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Paniccia N, Morse M, Salib M: Integrated photonics. In Silicon Photonics, Topics in Applied Physics. Volume Volume 94. Edited by: Pavesi L, Lockwood DJ. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2004:51–88. 10.1007/978-3-540-39913-1_2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pavesi L, Dal Negro L, Mazzoleni C, Franzò G, Priolo F: Optical gain in silicon nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 408: 440–444. 10.1038/35044012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Khriachtchev L, Räsänen M, Novikov S, Sinkkonen J: Optical gain in Si/SiO2 lattice: experimental evidence with nanosecond pulses. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 79: 1249–1251. 10.1063/1.1391406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lin G-R, Wu C-L, Lian C-W, Chang H-C: Saturated small-signal gain of Si quantum dots embedded in SiO2/SiOx/SiO2 strip-loaded waveguide amplifier made on quartz. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 021106. 10.1063/1.3179413View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin G-R, Lian C-W, Wu C-L, Lin Y-H: Gain analysis of optically-pumped Si nanocrystal waveguide amplifiers on silicon substrate. Opt Express 2010, 18: 9213–9219. 10.1364/OE.18.009213View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Irrera A, Iacona F, Crupi I, Presti CD, Franzò G, Bongiorno C, Sanfilippo D, Di Stefano G, Piana A, Fallica PG, Canino A, Priolo F: Electroluminescence and transport properties in amorphous silicon nanostructures. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 1428–1436. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/5/044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin G-R, Lin C-K, Chou L-J, Chueh Y-L: Synthesis of Si nanopyramids at SiOx/Si interface for enhancing electroluminescence of Si-rich SiOx. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 093126. 10.1063/1.2345227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin G-R, Lin C-J, Lin C-T: Low-plasma and high-temperature PECVD grown silicon-rich SiO x film with enhanced carrier tunneling and light emission. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 395202. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/39/395202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang WL, Zhang S, Yang M, Liu Z, Chen TP: Charging effect on electroluminescence performance of nc-Si/a-SiO2 films. J Appl Phys 2010, 107: 043709. 10.1063/1.3309742View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng C-H, Lien Y-C, Wu C-L, Lin G-R: Mutlicolor electroluminescent Si quantum dots embedded in SiOx thin film MOSLED with 2.4% external quantum efficiency. Opt Express 2013, 21: 391–403. 10.1364/OE.21.000391View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Podhorodecki A, Misiewicz J, Gourbilleau F, Cardin J, Dufour C: High energy excitation transfer from silicon nanocrystals to neodymium ions in silicon-rich oxide film. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2010, 13: K26-K28. 10.1149/1.3279688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Podhorodecki A, Zatryb G, Misiewicz J, Wojcik J, Wilson PRJ, Mascher P: Green light emission from terbium doped silicon rich silicon oxide films obtained by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology 2012, 23: 475707. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/47/475707View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shin JH, Seo SY, Kim S, Bishop SG: Photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy of erbium-doped silicon-rich silicon oxide. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 1999–2001. 10.1063/1.126234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kik PG, Brongersma ML, Polman A: Strong exciton-erbium coupling in Si nanocrystal-doped SiO2. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 2325–2327. 10.1063/1.126334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Priolo F, Franzò G, Pacifici D, Vinciguerra V, Iacona F, Irrera A: Role of the energy transfer in the optical properties of undoped and Er-doped interacting Si nanocrystals. J Appl Phys 2001, 89: 264–272. 10.1063/1.1331074View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Iacona F, Pacifici D, Irrera A, Miritello M, Franzò G, Priolo F, Sanfilippo D, Di Stefano G, Fallica PG: Electroluminescence at 1.54 μm in Er-doped Si nanocluster-based devices. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81: 3242–3244. 10.1063/1.1516235View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Han HS, Seo SY, Shin JH: Optical gain at 1.54 μm in erbium-doped silicon nanocluster sensitized waveguide. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 79: 4568–4570. 10.1063/1.1419035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Savchyn O, Ruhge FR, Kik PG, Todi RM, Coffey KR, Nukala H, Heinrich H: Luminescence-center-mediated excitation as the dominant Er sensitization mechanism in Er-doped silicon-rich SiO2 films. Phys Rev B 2007, 76: 195419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin L, Li D, Xiang L, Wang F, Yang D, Que D: Energy transfer from luminescent centers to Er3+ in erbium-doped silicon-rich oxide films. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 366. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-366View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wojdak M, Klik M, Forcales M, Gusev OB, Gregorkiewicz T, Pacifici D, Franzò G, Priolo F, Iacona F: Sensitization of Er luminescence by Si nanoclusters. Phys Rev B 2004, 69: 233315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrido B, Garcia C, Seo SY, Pellegrino P, Navarro-Urrios D, Daldosso N, Pavesi L, Gourbilleau F, Rizk R: Excitable Er fraction and quenching phenomena in Er-doped SiO2 layers containing Si nanoclusters. Phys Rev B 2007, 76: 245308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jin L, Li D, Xiang L, Wang F, Yang D, Que D: The modulation on luminescence of Er3+-doped silicon-rich oxide films by the structure evolution of silicon nanoclusters. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 34. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jambois O, Gourbilleau F, Kenyon AJ, Montserrat J, Rizk R, Garrido B: Towards population inversion of electrically pumped Er ions sensitized by Si nanoclusters. Opt Express 2010, 18: 2230–2235. 10.1364/OE.18.002230View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cueff S, Labbé C, Jambois O, Berencén Y, Kenyon AJ, Garrido B, Rizk R: Structural factors impacting carrier transport and electroluminescence from Si nanocluster-sensitized Er ions. Opt Express 2012, 20: 22490–22502. 10.1364/OE.20.022490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cueff S, Manel Ramírez J, Kurvits JA, Berencén Y, Zia R, Garrido B, Rizk R, Labbé C: Electroluminescence efficiencies of erbium in silicon-based hosts. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 103: 191109. 10.1063/1.4829142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Podhorodecki A, Zatryb G, Golacki LW, Misiewicz J, Wojcik J, Mascher P: On the origin of emission and thermal quenching of SRSO:Er3+ films grown by ECR-PECVD. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 98. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-98View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang X, Lin T, Zhang P, Xu J, Lin S, Xu L, Chen K: Highly efficient near-infrared emission in Er3+ doped silica films containing size-tunable SnO2 nanocrystals. Opt Express 2014, 22: 369–376. 10.1364/OE.22.000369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin G-R, Lin C-J, Chen C-Y: Enhanced pumping energy transfer between Si nanocrystals and erbium ions in Si-rich SiOx sputtered using Si/Er2O3 encapsulated SiO substrate. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2007, 7: 2847–2851. 10.1166/jnn.2007.867View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu L, Jin L, Li D, Yang D: Sensitization of Er3+ ions in silicon rich oxynitride films: effect of thermal treatments. Opt Express 2014, 22: 13022–13028. 10.1364/OE.22.013022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez JR, Ruiz F, Vorobiev YV, Pérez-Robles F, González-Hernández J: Infrared spectroscopy analysis of the local atomic structure in silica prepared by sol–gel. J Chem Phys 1998, 109: 7511–7514. 10.1063/1.477374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Jin L, Li D, Yang D, Que D: Modulation effect of microstructures in silicon-rich oxide matrix on photoluminescence from silicon nanoclusters prepared by different fabrication techniques. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 2013, 113: 121–126. 10.1007/s00339-012-7496-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sreejith K, Pillai CGS: IR study on the effect of chloride ion on porous silicon. Appl Surf Sci 2006, 252: 8399–8403. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.10.064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cheang-Wong JC, Oliver A, Roiz J, Hernández JM, Rodríguez-Fernández L, Morales JG, Crespo-Sosa A: Optical properties of Ir2+-implanted silica glass. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B-Beam Interact Mater Atoms 2001, 175: 490–494.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanjilal A, Rebohle L, Voelskow M, Skorupa W, Helm M: Influence of annealing on the Er luminescence in Si-rich SiO2 layers coimplanted with Er ions. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 103522. 10.1063/1.3021414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Suzuki T, Skuja L, Kajihara K, Hirano M, Kamiya T, Hosono H: Electronic structure of oxygen dangling bond in glassy SiO2: the role of hyperconjugation. Phys Rev Lett 2003, 90: 186404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu L, Jin L, Li D, Yang D: Effects of excess silicon on the 1540 nm Er3+ luminescence in silicon rich oxynitride films. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 103: 071101. 10.1063/1.4818130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Khriachtchev L, Räsänen M, Novikov S, Pavesi L: Systematic correlation between Raman spectra, photoluminescence intensity, and absorption coefficient of silica layers containing Si nanocrystals. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 1511–1513. 10.1063/1.1781733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Khriachtchev L, Kilpelä O, Karirinne S, Keränen J, Lepistö T: Substrate-dependent crystallization and enhancement of visible photoluminescence in thermal annealing of Si/SiO2 superlattices. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78: 323–325. 10.1063/1.1341227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. de Dood MJA, Knoester J, Tip A, Polman A: Förster transfer and the local optical density of states in erbium-doped silica. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 115102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pacifici D, Franzò G, Priolo F, Iacona F, Dal Negro L: Modeling and perspectives of the Si nanocrystals–Er interaction for optical amplification. Phys Rev B 2003, 67: 245301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xu et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement