- Nano Express
- Open Access
Cellulose-lanthanum hydroxide nanocomposite as a selective marker for detection of toxic copper
© Marwani et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
- Received: 13 June 2014
- Accepted: 25 August 2014
- Published: 3 September 2014
In this current report, a simple, reliable, and rapid method based on modifying the cellulose surface by doping it with different percentages of lanthanum hydroxide (i.e., 1% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC), 5% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC2), and 10% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC3)) was proposed as a selective marker for detection of copper (Cu(II)) in aqueous medium. Surface properties of the newly modified cellulose phases were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis. The effect of pH on the adsorption of modified cellulose phases for Cu(II) was evaluated, and LC3 was found to be the most selective for Cu(II) at pH 6.0. Other parameters, influencing the maximum uptake of Cu(II) on LC3, were also investigated for a deeper mechanistic understanding of the adsorption phenomena. Results showed that the adsorption capacity for Cu(II) was improved by 211% on the LC3 phase as compared to diethylaminoethyl cellulose phase after only 2 h contact time. Adsorption isotherm data established that the adsorption process nature was monolayer with a homogeneous adsorbent surface. Results displayed that the adsorption of Cu(II) onto the LC3 phase obeyed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Selectivity studies toward eight metal ions, i.e., Cd(II), Co(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI), Cu(II), Fe(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II), were further performed at the optimized pH value. Based on the selectivity study, it was found that Cu(II) is highly selective toward the LC3 phase. Moreover, the efficiency of the proposed method was supported by implementing it to real environmental water samples with adequate results.
- Modified cellulose phase
- Batch method
Over the years, copper (Cu(II)) has gain the attention of chemists due to its prohibitive toxicity and nonbiodegradable nature. The elevated concentration of Cu(II) produces severe ecological and public health issues [1, 2]. Several methodologies have been evaluated for the separation of Cu(II) in aqueous medium. However, the adsorption technique has proved to be one of the promising solutions due to its simple implementation and economical and effective behavior [3, 4]. Currently, some of the available adsorbents have limitations, such as low uptake capacity, long equilibrium, and low selectivity . In order to overcome these weaknesses, some new organic-inorganic hybrid adsorbents, capable of separating heavy metals from the solution, have been established. Several studies have been concentrated on the extraction of Cu(II) by applying amine group functionalized matrices [6–9]. It is well understood that organic functional group modified adsorbents usually exhibit relatively high adsorption capacity and selectivity as compared to unmodified adsorbents [6, 10–12].
Different separation techniques, however, are being successfully utilized, for example, liquid-liquid extraction , ion exchange , coprecipitation , cloud point extraction , and solid phase extraction (SPE) [17, 18]. The conventional methods, such as liquid-liquid extraction and coprecipitation, require excess amount of organic solvents with high purity that could be harmful to living organisms and cause environmental pollution. On the other hand, the SPE method proved to be a more efficient technique when it comes to the exposure and usage of solvents, extraction time, and disposal cost. Presently, this recognition of SPE leads to the appearance of several adsorbents with the goal of succeeding a selective separation of the analytes, for instance, alumina , C18 , molecular imprinted polymers , cellulose , silica gel , and activated carbon [24, 25].
Cellulose is considered to be one of the highly abundant naturally existing polymers in the world. This comprises repeating units of β-d-glucopyranose, covalently linked with OH group of C4 and C1 carbon atoms [26–28]. Naturally occurring cellulose shows less adsorption capacity and physical stability due to the steric hindrance offered by three hydroxyl groups with the same ring. Moreover, these hydroxyl moieties are chemically unreactive as the polymer matrix contains crystalline regions [27, 29]. In order to develop adsorption capacity and structural stability of natural cellulose, modifications were employed in the matrix by means of chemical reactions, such as halogenation, etherification, esterification, and oxidation. Such modified matrices were found to be capable of separating heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions . The cellulose beads when treated mainly with 2-(diethylamino) ethyl chloride hydrochloride along with some other treatments produced diethylaminoethyl cellulose . Recently, we have also developed some surface modified cellulose adsorbents for the selective separation of Ni(II) and Cr(VI) ions [31, 32].
In order to monitor metal ionic species in the environment, the development of rapid, simple, and proficient approach has gain an interest. Different approaches were employed for the determination of metal ions in aqueous medium, namely atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) , inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) [34–36], anodic stripping voltammetry , and ion chromatography . Despite immense enhancement in selectivity and sensitivity of state-of-the-art instruments, there is still a vital need for improvement in selective separation of chemical species of interest prior to their determination; in particular, the concentration of such analytes is frequently low in complex matrices. Moreover, a cleanup step is frequently needed because of high level of other constituents accompanying the analyte.
Current study emphasizes the development of new cellulose-based adsorbents by surface modification. Lanthanum hydroxide was doped with cellulose with a proportion of 1%, 5%, and 10% [i.e., 1% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC), 5% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC2), and 10% La(OH)3-cellulose (LC3)]. Additionally, the effectiveness of nanocomposites was investigated as a potential adsorbent for a selective extraction of Cu(II) ion prior to its determination by ICP-OES. Several parameters were evaluated in order to acquire the optimum condition for Cu(II) extraction. The pH effect on Cu(II) adsorption was investigated and optimized for the best modified cellulose phase (LC3). In order to understand the mechanism of Cu(II) adsorption, other parameters controlling the maximum uptake of Cu(II) on LC3 was studied at the optimum pH 6.0. Furthermore, adsorption data was modeled by Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms. The kinetics of adsorption was evaluated by employing pseudo-first- and second-order kinetic models. At optimized pH, selectivity was also scrutinized for other metal ion, including Cd(II), Co(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II). This study revealed that LC3 was the most selective toward Cu(II) in comparison to other metal ions. Ultimately, the proposed method was further validated by analysis of real environmental water samples.
Chemicals and reagents
Diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) cellulose, lanthanum chloride, and ethanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Stock standard solutions of 1,000 mgL-1 Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II),Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). All utilized reagents were of high purity and of analytical reagent grade, whereas double-distilled deionized water was used throughout the experiments.
Preparation of the new solid phase extractor based on DEAE cellulose
Different amounts of DEAE cellulose (99%, 95%, and 90%) were first mixed with distilled deionized water. Various portions of lanthanum chloride (1%, 5%, and 10%) were then dissolved in distilled deionized water and mixed with DEAE cellulose water suspensions. All solutions were adjusted to pH 10.0 by a dropwise addition of 0.1-M NaOH. Mixtures were then allowed to stir at 60°C for 24 h. Mixtures were filtered, washed with ethanol twice and 18.2 MΩ cm distilled deionized water, and dried in oven at 80°C for 5 h to obtain LC, LC2, and LC3 nanocomposites.
Samples preparation and procedure
Stock standard solutions of Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II),Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe(III), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions were prepared in 18.2 MΩ cm distilled deionized water and stored in the refrigerator at 4°C. The environmental samples were collected from seawater, wastewater, tap water, and ground water from Jeddah region at Saudi Arabia.
Effect of pH
The effect of pH on the adsorption of Cu(II) ion onto n% La(OH)3 DEAE cellulose was investigated. Standard solutions of 5.0 mgL-1 Cu(II) were adjusted to pH values ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 with appropriate buffer solutions, i.e., HCl/KCl buffer for pH 1.0 and 2.0, acetate buffer for pH 3.0 to 5.0, and KH2PO4/NaOH buffer for pH 6.0 to 8.0. Each solution was individually mixed with 25.0 mg of modified cellulose phases (LC, LC2, or LC3) and unmodified DEAE cellulose phase and mechanically shaken for 2 h by a mechanical shaker at 150 rpm and 25°C temperature.
Effect of concentration
To estimate the uptake capacity of Cu(II) under batch conditions, standard solutions of 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mgL-1 were prepared and adjusted to the optimum pH 6.0 with the buffer solution of KH2PO4/NaOH. Each solution was individually added to 25.0 mg LC3 (or unmodified DEAE cellulose). All mixtures were then allowed to be mechanically shaken for 2 h at 25°C.
Effect of temperature
For the effect of temperature, standard solutions of 5.0 mgL-1 Cu(II) were prepared, adjusted to the pH 6.0 as above, and individually mixed with 25.0 mg LC3. Thermodynamic study of the adsorption of LC3 toward Cu(II) was also performed under the same batch conditions at different temperatures (298, 308, 323, and 338 K).
Effect of shaking time
The effect of shaking time on LC3 adsorption for Cu(II) was performed under the same batch conditions as above by given various equilibrium periods (5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, and 120 min) and at a concentration of 400 mgL-1 of Cu(II).
In order to investigate the selectivity of modified cellulose adsorbents toward different metal ions, including Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe(III), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II), 5 mgL-1 of each metal ion solution was individually added to 25.0 mg of modified phases ( LC, LC2, or LC3) and unmodified DEAE cellulose separately as well. Mixtures were then allowed to be stirred for 2 h at 25°C under the same batch conditions as above.
The surface morphology of the nanocomposites was investigated by operating a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) instrument (JSM-7600 F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan). Elemental analysis was performed using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) from JEOL, Japan. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired with X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku X-ray diffractometer, MiniFlex 2, Rigaku, Shibuya-ku, Japan) equipped with Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 nm) using a generator voltage (40.0 kV) and a generator current (35.0 mA). Data of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were acquired from Thermo Scientific K-α KA1066 spectrometer (Bonn, Germany). The Al Kα X-ray radiation monochromatic sources were utilized as excitation sources, whereas the size of beam spot was set at 300.0 μm. The fixed analyzer transmission mode was used to record the spectra adjusting pass energy at 200 eV. The scan of spectra was performed at a pressure less than 10-8 Torr. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic analyses were carried out by using Shimadzu IR 470 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to confirm the formation of newly prepared nanocomposites. The pH measurements were performed on pH meter (inoLab® pH 7200, WTW, Lincolnwood, IL, USA) with absolute accuracy limits at the pH measurement being defined by NIST buffers. A PerkinElmer ICP-OES Optima 4100 DV model (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was applied for the determination of metal ions concentration. The optimization of ICP-OES instrument was performed daily before analysis and operated as recommended by the manufacturers.
The ICP-OES spectrometer was operated with the following parameters: FR power, 1,300 kW; frequency, 27.12 MHz; demountable quartz torch, Ar/Ar/Ar; plasma gas (Ar) flow, 15.0 L min-1; auxiliary gas (Ar) flow, 0.2 L min-1; nebulizer gas (Ar) flow, 0.8 L min-1; nebulizer pressure, 2.4 bar; glass spray chamber according to Scott (Ryton), sample pump flow rate, 1.5 mL min-1; integration time, 3 s; replicates, 3; wavelength range of monochromator, 165 to 460 nm. The concentrations of the metal ions were determined at wavelengths of 226.50 nm for Cd(II), 230.80 nm for Co(II), 267.72 nm for Cr(III and VI), 327.40 nm for Cu(II), 259.94 nm for Fe(III), 231.60 nm for Ni(II), and 202.55 nm for Zn(II).
Effect of pH
Effect of shaking time
Effect of temperature
where Kd is distribution adsorption coefficient, Co and Ce denote initial and final concentrations of the metal before and after adsorption, respectively, V corresponds to the volume (mL), m represents the weight of the phase (g), R is the universal gas constant (8.314 Jmol-1 K-1), and T corresponds to the temperature in Kelvin.
Thermodynamic parameters associated with the adsorption of Cu(II) on LC3 phase
T = 298 K
T = 303 K
T = 323 K
T = 338 K
Adsorption isotherm models
where b is the Langmuir constant, indicating the nature of adsorption and the shape of the isotherm and Co is the initial concentration of the analyte of interest. The RL values specify the type of isotherm, and RL values within 0 to 1 suggest a favorable adsorption .
where Kf and n are the Freundlich isotherm constants related to adsorption capacity and intensity of adsorption, respectively. Freundlich constants (Kf and n) can be calculated from the intercept and slope, respectively, of the linear plot of logqe versus logCe.
Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm parameters for the adsorption of Cu(II) on LC3 phase
where υo = k2 is the initial adsorption rate (mgg-1 min-1) where k2 (gmg-1 min-1) corresponds to the rate constant of the pseudo-second-order adsorption, qe (mgg-1) is the amount of metal ion adsorbed at equilibrium, and qt (mgg-1) refers to the amount of metal ion on the adsorbent surface at any time t (min). The plot of t/qt versus t was developed in order to deduce kinetic parameters of υo and qe from the intercept and slope, respectively.
Pseudo-first- and second-order kinetic model parameters for extraction of Cu(II) by LC3 phase
Pseudo-first-order kinetic model
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model
Performance of proposed method
Selectivity studies of modified and unmodified DEAE cellulose adsorbents toward different metal ions, including Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II),Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II), were investigated by determining the distribution coefficient of all the phases at optimum pH value (pH 6.0). Distribution coefficient (Kd) values were determined from Equation 1.
Uptake capacities and distribution coefficient values of different metal ions against unmodified DEAE cellulose and modified cellulose phases at pH 6.0 and 25°C
Unmodified DEAE cellulose
1.42 × 102
1.76 × 102
2.24 × 102
1.71 × 102
1.70 × 102
6.15 × 102
5.93 × 102
8.70 × 102
7.53 × 102
4.07 × 103
5.88 × 103
9.67 × 102
1.61 × 104
4.83 × 103
1.51 × 104
3.78 × 101
5.01 × 103
7.68 × 103
4.54 × 105
8.98 × 102
6.85 × 102
3.02 × 103
6.02 × 103
5.46 × 101
5.69 × 101
1.05 × 102
1.92 × 102
2.03 × 102
7.79 × 102
2.79 × 102
Application in real environmental samples
Determination of Cu(II) at different concentrations in real water samples utilizing LC3 phase
This paper was funded by King Abdulaziz University, under grant No. (T-001/431). The authors, therefore, acknowledge technical and financial support of KAU.
- Hao Y-M, Man C, Hu Z-B: Effective removal of Cu (II) ions from aqueous solution by amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 2010, 184: 392–399. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y: Investigations of nickel (II) removal from aqueous solutions using tea factory waste. J Hazard Mater 2005, 127: 120–128. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Northcott KA, Miyakawa K, Oshima S, Komatsu Y, Perera JM, Stevens GW: The adsorption of divalent metal cations on mesoporous silicate MCM-41. Chem Eng J 2010, 157: 25–28. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hasan SH, Srivastava P: Batch and continuous biosorption of Cu2+ by immobilized biomass of Arthrobacter sp. J Environ Manag 2009, 90: 3313–3321. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue X, Li F: Removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto functionalized SBA-16 mesoporous silica. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2008, 116: 116–122. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.03.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lam KF, Yeung KL, McKay G: A rational approach in the design of selective mesoporous adsorbents. Langmuir 2006, 22: 9632–9641. 10.1021/la061410pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeong E-Y, Ansari MB, Mo Y-H, Park S-E: Removal of Cu (II) from water by tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin-functionalized mesoporous silica. J Hazard Mater 2011, 185: 1311–1317. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Huang S, Kang S, Zhang C, Li X: Low-cost route for synthesis of mesoporous silica materials with high silanol groups and their application for Cu (II) removal. Mater Chem Phys 2012, 132: 1053–1059. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Yu C, Zhao W, Hua Z, Chen H, Li L, Shi J: Preparation of multi-amine-grafted mesoporous silicas and their application to heavy metal ions adsorption. J Non-Cryst Solids 2007, 353: 4055–4061. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.06.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chakraborty S, Tare V: Role of various parameters in synthesis of insoluble agrobased xanthates for removal of copper from wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97: 2407–2413. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar GP, Kumar P, Chakraborty S, Ray M: Uptake and desorption of copper ion using functionalized polymer coated silica gel in aqueous environment. Sep Purif Technol 2007, 57: 47–56. 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Miao X, Hao Y, Zhao J, Sun X, Wang L: Synthesis, amino-functionalization of mesoporous silica and its adsorption of Cr (VI). J Colloid Interface Sci 2008, 318: 309–314. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nasu A, Yamaguchi S, Sekine T: Solvent extraction of copper(I) and (II) as thiocyanate complexes with tetrabutylammonium ions into chloroform and with trioctylphosphine oxide into hexane. Anal Sci 1997, 13: 903–911. 10.2116/analsci.13.903View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao GH, Fang Z: Dual stage preconcentration system for flame atomic absorption spectrometry using flow injection on-line ion-exchange followed by solvent extraction. J Anal Chem 1998, 360: 156–160. 10.1007/s002160050667View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soylak M, Erdogan ND: Copper(ii)-rubeanic acid coprecipitation system for separation-preconcentration of trace metal ions in environmental samples for their flame atomic absorption spectrometric determinations. J Hazard Mater 2006, 137: 1035–1041. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manzoori JL, Abdolmohammad-Zadeh H, Amjadi M: Simplified cloud point extraction for the preconcentration of ultra-trace amounts of gold prior to determination by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchim Acta 2007, 159: 71–78. 10.1007/s00604-006-0727-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed SA: Alumina physically loaded by thiosemicarbazide for selective preconcentration of mercury(ii) ion from natural water samples. J Hazard Mater 2008, 156: 521–529. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez AM, Alvarez JRE, Alvarez RP: Heavy metal analysis of rainwaters: a comparison of txrf and asv analytical capabilities. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2007, 273: 427–433. 10.1007/s10967-007-6895-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soliman EM, Ahmed SA: Selective separation of silver(i) and mercury(ii) ions in natural water samples using alumina modified thiouracil derivatives as new solid phase extractors. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2009, 89: 389–406. 10.1080/03067310902719142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pei S, Fang Z: Flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of silver in geological materials using a flow-injection system with on-line preconcentration by coprecipitation with diethyldithio-carbamate. Anal Chim Acta 1994, 294: 185–193. 10.1016/0003-2670(94)80193-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saraji M, Yousefi H: Selective solid-phase extraction of Ni(II) by an ion-imprinted polymer from water samples. J Hazard Mater 2009, 167: 1152–1157. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gustavo Rocha de C, Ilton Luiz de A, Paulo dos Santos R: Synthesis, characterization and determination of the metal ions adsorption capacity of cellulose modified with p-aminobenzoic groups. Journal of Materials Research 2004, 7: 329–334. 10.1590/S1516-14392004000200018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahmoud ME, Kenawy IMM, Soliman EM, Hafez MA, Akl MAA, Lashein RRA: Selective preconcentration of uranyl ion by silica gel phases modified with chelating compounds as inorganic polymeric ion exchangers. Anal Sci 2008, 24: 381–387. 10.2116/analsci.24.381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Yoshihara K, Moriyama K, Machida M, Tatsumoto H: Influence of activated carbon surface acidity on adsorption of heavy metal ions and aromatics from aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci 2007, 253: 8554–8559. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.04.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-polo M, Rivera-utrilla J: Adsorbent-adsorbate interactions in the adsorption of Cd(ii) and Hg(ii) on ozonized activated carbons. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36: 3850–3854. 10.1021/es0255610View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clasen C, Kulicke W-M: Determination of viscoelastic and rheo-optical material functions of water-soluble cellulose derivatives. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26: 1839–1919. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00024-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF: Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99: 6709–6724. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan DL: Biopolymers from renewable resources. New York: Springer; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirk R, Othmer D: Cellulose encyclopedia of chemical technology. New York: Wiley; 1967.Google Scholar
- Ishimura D, Morimoto Y, Saito H: Influences of chemical modifications on the mechanical strength of cellulose beads. Cellulose 1998, 5: 135–151. 10.1023/A:1009277216057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan SB, Alamry KA, Marwani HM, Asiri AM, Rahman MM: Synthesis and environmental applications of cellulose/ZrO2 nanohybrid as a selective adsorbent for nickel ion. Composites Part B: Engineering 2013, 50: 253–258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asiri AM, Khan SB, Alamry KA, Marwani HM, Rahman MM: Growth of Mn3O4 on cellulose matrix: nanohybrid as a solid phase adsorbent for trivalent chromium. Applied Surface Science 2013, 270: 539–544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ajtony Z, Bencs L, Haraszi R, Jeno S, Szoboszlai N: Study on the simultaneous determination of some essential and toxic trace elements in honey by multi-element graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2007, 71: 683–690. 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.05.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montes-Bayon M, Pröfrock D, Sanz-Medel A, Prange A: Direct comparison of capillary electrophoresis and capillary liquid chromatography hyphenated to collision-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the investigation of Cd-, Cu- and Zn-containing metalloproteins. J Chromatogr A 2006, 1114: 138–144. 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.02.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Z, Chang X, Zou X, Zhu X, Nie R, Hu Z, Li R: Chemically-modified activated carbon with ethylenediamine for selective solid-phase extraction and preconcentration of metal ions. Anal Chim Acta 2009, 632: 272–277. 10.1016/j.aca.2008.11.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Hu Z, Chang X, He Q, Zhang L, Tu Z, Shi J: Chemically modified activated carbon with 1-acylthiosemicarbazide for selective solid-phase extraction and preconcentration of trace Cu(II), Hg(II) and Pb(II) from water samples. J Hazard Mater 2009, 172: 324–329. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonfil Y, Kirowa-Eisner E: Determination of nanomolar concentrations of lead and cadmium by anodic-stripping voltammetry at the silver electrode. Anal Chim Acta 2002, 457: 285–296. 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00016-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanikkul S, Jakmunee J, Lapanantnoppakhun S, Rayanakorn M, Sooksamiti P, Synovec RE, Christian GD, Grudpan K: Flow injection invalve mini-column pretreatment combined with ion chromatography for cadmium, lead and zinc determination. Talanta 2004, 64: 1241–1246. 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.05.060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ci L, Wei B, Xu C, Liang J, Wu D, Xie S, Zhou W, Li Y, Liu Z, Tang D: Crystallization behavior of the amorphous carbon nanotubes prepared by the CVD method. J Cryst Growth 2001, 233: 823–828. 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01606-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salavati-Niasari M, Hosseinzadeh G, Davar F: Synthesis of lanthanum hydroxide and lanthanum oxide nanoparticles by sonochemical method. J Alloys Compd 2011, 509: 4098–4103. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.083View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng F, Ren J-L, Xu F, Bian J, Peng P, Sun R-C: Comparative studies on the physico-chemical properties of hemicelluloses obtained by DEAE-cellulose-52 chromatography from sugarcane bagasse. Food Res Int 2010, 43: 683–693. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strohmeier BR, Levden DE, Field RS, Hercules DM: Surface spectroscopic characterization of CuAl2O3 catalysts. J Catal 1985, 94: 514–530. 10.1016/0021-9517(85)90216-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pang Y, Zeng G, Tang L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Lei X, Li Z, Zhang J, Xie G: PEI-grafted magnetic porous powder for highly effective adsorption of heavy metal ions. Desalination 2011, 281: 278–284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng Y, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, Niu Q-Y, Zhang H-Y, Niu C-G, Deng J-H, Yan M: Adsorption of Cd (II) and Zn (II) from aqueous solutions using magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as adsorbents. Chem Eng J 2010, 162: 487–494. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yılmaz V, Hazer O, Kartal S: Synthesis, characterization and application of a novel ion-imprinted polymer for selective solid phase extraction of copper (II) ions from high salt matrices prior to its determination by FAAS. Talanta 2013, 2013: 2013.Google Scholar
- Lan S, Wu X, Li L, Li M, Guo F, Gan S: Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid-supported magnetic microspheres for copper ions removal. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2013, 425: 42–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou L, Wang Y, Liu Z, Huang Q: Characteristics of equilibrium, kinetics studies for adsorption of Hg (II), Cu (II), and Ni (II) ions by thiourea-modified magnetic chitosan microspheres. J Hazard Mater 2009, 161: 995–1002. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.078View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X, Zhang G, Jia Q, Zhao C, Zhou W, Li W: Adsorption of Cu (II), Pb (II), Co (II), Ni (II), and Cd (II) from aqueous solution by poly (aryl ether ketone) containing pendant carboxyl groups (PEK-L): equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Chem Eng J 2011, 171: 152–158. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.080View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monier M, Nawar N, Abdel-Latif D: Preparation and characterization of chelating fibers based on natural wool for removal of Hg (II), Cu (II) and Co (II) metal ions from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 2010, 184: 118–125. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Xu L, Cheng C, Meng Y, Li A: Preparation of new chelating fiber with waste PET as adsorbent for fast removal of Cu2+ and Ni2+ from water: kinetic and equilibrium adsorption studies. Chem Eng J 2012, 193: 31–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Langmuir I: The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1916, 38: 2221–2295. 10.1021/ja02268a002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mckay G, Blair HS, Gardener JR: Adsorption of dyes on chitin-I: equilibrium studies. J Appl Polym Sci 1982, 27: 3043–3057. 10.1002/app.1982.070270827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.