- Nano Express
- Open Access
Cell behaviour on a polyaniline nanoprotrusion structure surface
© Nam et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
- Received: 9 July 2014
- Accepted: 1 October 2014
- Published: 11 October 2014
The extracellular matrix provides mechanical support and affects cell behaviour. Nanoscale structures have been shown to have functions similar to the extracellular matrix. In this study, we fabricated nanoprotrusion structures with polyaniline as cell culture plates using a simple method and determined the effects of these nanoprotrusion structures on cells.
- Nanoprotrusion structure
- Cell behaviour
Most of the cells in the human body require adhesion to surfaces for survival. Therefore, cells generate extracellular matrix (ECM), which facilitates their adherence to a surface and influences their behaviour, such as orientation, proliferation, migration and differentiation [1, 2]. In addition, the nanoscale topography of the surface enhances cellular protein adsorption and affects cell behaviour, similar to the ECM .
Several studies regarding the fabrication of nanostructures that may influence cell behaviour have been conducted. Teixeira et al.  fabricated nanogrooves on silicon using electron-beam lithography. This lithography process allows the generation of diverse nanoscale patterns, such as further groove patterns, protrusions, holes and shapes [5, 6]. However, these fabrication processes are complex, expensive and time-consuming. The materials used are also restricted: a silicon wafer is normally used. It is also largely non-transparent, difficult to handle, and is unsuitable for use in routine cell culture in the laboratory.
To address the reproduction and non-transparency problems, Li et al.  used polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), which is a transparent and easy-to-handle material for moulding. Although the moulding accuracy is high, additional processes are required to make a nanoscale mould.
Here, we investigated a readily fabricated polyaniline nanostructure as a cell culture surface. Polyaniline, consisting of aniline polymerised using simple methods, is an interesting and commonly used material because it is an organic polymer that can conduct electricity. Furthermore, polyaniline has a number of advantages, including simple polymerisation, low cost, good environmental stability, controllable electrical conductivity and the ability to polymerise under various conditions . It can be synthesised on many surfaces and applied in various fields, including electrodes, sensors and other biomedical applications . Here, we evaluated the behaviours of MC3T3-E1 cell on a structured polyaniline surface.
Preparation of polyaniline nanoprotrusion structured surface
Polyaniline nanostructures were synthesised on commercial 12-well tissue culture plates (TCP; BD Falcon, San Jose, CA, USA) using the dilute polymerisation method . First, 1 M HClO4 (Samchun Chemical, Seoul, Korea), 0.0067 M ammonium persulphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.01 M aniline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and deionised (DI) water were mixed with an orbital shaker at 4°C for 12 h. The samples were then washed in DI water to remove any residue.
To assess the topographic effects (i.e. with or without nanostructures), the prepared polyaniline nanoprotrusion structure surface was rubbed at saturation level with a rubberised cloth to flatten all protrusions .
Surface properties of polyaniline nanoprotrusion structure surface
The samples were coated with platinum (Pt) and the surface topography was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The surface roughness was also measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM; Seiko Instruments Inc., Chiba, Japan).
Surface properties were evaluated by measuring the contact angle of the samples, captured with a camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The DI water droplet volume was 5 μL. Measurements were performed in five different areas of each sample and analysed using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Cell seeding and culture
The samples were sterilised under UV light for 1 day. MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts were seeded at 0.5 × 104 cells/well and cultured for 7 days in α-MEM supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) at 37°C, 5% CO2. The medium was replaced every 3 days.
Cell cytotoxicity and morphology
Cell cytotoxicity was verified by live/dead staining. Live cells were stained with calcein-AM (Anaspec, San Jose, CA, USA) and dead cells with ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1; Anaspec) after 1 and 7 days in culture. Images were obtained by fluorescence microscopy. The live cells were stained green and dead cells were stained red.
The cell cytoskeleton was stained to examine cell morphology. The actin filaments were stained with phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), the nucleus was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Golden Bridge, City of Industry, CA, USA). The actin filaments are shown as green and the nucleus as blue on fluorescence micrographs. ImageJ was used to measure the average adhesion area (μm2) of each cell.
For more detailed observation of cell morphology, surface-attached cells were visualised by SEM. The samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde. Following ethanol dehydration and drying , the samples were coated with Pt.
Cell proliferation and differentiation
We measured total DNA levels in MC3T3-E1 cells to determine their proliferation. TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to each sample and DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The absorbances at 260 and 280 nm of appropriately diluted samples were measured on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 after cell seeding.
Osteoblasts were cultured in medium containing l-ascorbic acid (50 μg/mL) and β-glycerophosphate (10 mM) for 7 days. Osteogenesis-related gene expression was quantified by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from samples using TRIzol reagent, converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and analysed using a LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of type I collagen (COL-I), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) were normalised relative to that of GAPDH as a control.
Surface properties of polyaniline nanoprotrusion structure surface
We evaluated cell behaviour on a polyaniline nanoprotrusion structure surface. This surface was more hydrophilic than TCP, which enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation. The PNS also increased osteoblast differentiation because the nanoprotrusions affected cell growth and morphology. This surface was fabricated by self-assembly dilute polymerisation, which is a simple and inexpensive method. It showed no cytotoxicity under the conditions tested and was stable under cell culture conditions. The nanoprotrusion structures on the surface affect the shape of the cells and enhance their behaviour.
This study was performed to quantify the effect of polyaniline nanoprotrusion on cell behaviour. Polyaniline is a very effective conducting polymer. The results of the present study will be useful in electrical signal to cell . Our findings suggest that polyaniline surfaces with nanoprotrusions can be applied to culture plates to influence the behaviour of cells seeded thereon.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012012805).
- Alves NM, Pashkuleva I, Reis RL, Mano JF: Controlling cell behavior through the design of polymer surfaces. Small 2010, 6: 2208–2220. 10.1002/smll.201000233View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez E, Engel E, Planell JA, Samitier J: Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann Anat 2009, 191: 126–135. 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.05.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF: Advancing dental implant surface technology – from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008, 29: 3822–3835. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF: Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci 2003, 116: 1881–1892. 10.1242/jcs.00383View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ranella A, Barberoglou M, Bakogianni S, Fotakis C, Stratakis E: Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures. Acta Biomater 2010, 6: 2711–2720. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD: The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007, 84: 973–979.Google Scholar
- Li JY, Ho YC, Chung YC, Lin FC, Liao WL, Tsai WB: Preparation of micron/submicron hybrid patterns via a two-stage UV-imprint technique and their dimensional effects on cell adhesion and alignment. Biofabrication 2013, 5: 035003. 10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan P, Amalraj J: Polyaniline materials by emulsion polymerization pathway. Prog Polym Sci 2008, 33: 732–758. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- György I: Conducting polymers application: a new era in electrochemistry. In Monographs in Electrochemistry. Edited by: Scholz F. New York: Springer; 2012:1–3.Google Scholar
- Chiou NR, Lu C, Guan J, Lee LJ, Epstein AJ: Growth and alignment of polyaniline nanofibres with superhydrophobic, superhydrophilic and other properties. Nat Nanotechnol 2007, 2: 354–357. 10.1038/nnano.2007.147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim D, Oh-e M, Shen YR: Rubbed polyimide surface studied by sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2001, 34: 9125–9129. 10.1021/ma0100908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keith RM, Christopher AS: Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2001, 82: 80–91.Google Scholar
- Wei J, Igarashi T, Okumori N, Igarashi T, Maetani T, Liu B, Yoshinari M: Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts. Biomed Mater 2009, 4: 045002. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dowling DP, Miller IS, Ardhaoui M, Gallagher WM: Effect of surface wettability and topography on the adhesion of osteosarcoma cells on plasma-modified polystyrene. J Biomater Appl 2011, 26: 327–347. 10.1177/0885328210372148View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Versaevel M, Grevesse T, Gabriele S: Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat Commun 2012, 3: 671.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shao S, Zhou S, Li L, Li J, Luo C, Wang J, Li X, Weng J: Osteoblast function on electrically conductive electrospun PLA/MWCNTs nanofibers. Biomaterials 2011, 32: 2821–2833. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.