Open Access

Improving the efficiency of cadmium sulfide-sensitized titanium dioxide/indium tin oxide glass photoelectrodes using silver sulfide as an energy barrier layer and a light absorber

Nanoscale Research Letters20149:605

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-605

Received: 2 October 2014

Accepted: 19 October 2014

Published: 7 November 2014

Abstract

Cadmium sulfide (CdS) and silver sulfide (Ag2S) nanocrystals are deposited on the titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocrystalline film on indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate to prepare CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO photoelectrodes through a new method known as the molecular precursor decomposition method. The Ag2S is interposed between the TiO2 nanocrystal film and CdS nanocrystals as an energy barrier layer and a light absorber. As a consequence, the energy conversion efficiency of the CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes is significantly improved. Under AM 1.5 G sunlight irradiation, the maximum efficiency achieved for the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is 3.46%, corresponding to an increase of about 150% as compared to the CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrode without the Ag2S layer. Our experimental results show that the improved efficiency is mainly due to the formation of Ag2S layer that may increase the light absorbance and reduce the recombination of photogenerated electrons with redox ions from the electrolyte.

Keywords

Silver sulfide nanocrystalsTitanium dioxidePhotoelectrodesEfficiencyRecombination

Background

Dye-sensitized photoelectrodes consisting of a wide band gap semiconductor film and a dye form the basis of many applications in photocatalytic, optoelectronic, and photovoltaic devices [110]. In photovoltaic applications, the photoelectrodes are typically titanium dioxide (TiO2) films, which are sensitized by an organic or inorganic dye [7, 9, 11]. In dye-sensitized photoelectrodes, the dye plays an important role in light absorption and charge transfer. Compared with organic dyes, semiconductor nanocrystals (i.e., inorganic dyes) with their size-tunable absorption and high molar extinction coefficient [12, 13] are superior in thermal and photochemical stability. Due to these advantages of semiconductor nanocrystals, theoretically, semiconductor nanocrystal-sensitized solar cells may have a maximum efficiency of 44%, which is much higher than that of organic dye-sensitized solar cells [14].

So far, various types of inorganic nanocrystals such as CdS [1517], CdTe [15, 16], CuInS2[18, 19], Ag2S [2024], and PbS [25, 26] have been incorporated on TiO2 photoelectrodes as sensitizers to enhance the light absorption of the TiO2 photoelectrodes in the visible light region. Among single nanocrystal-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes, CdS-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes show a better photoelectric conversion performance. The efficiency of over 4% has been reported for CdS-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrodes. However, it is still much lower than that of organic dye-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes [2730]. The low efficiency is mostly caused by the serious charge recombination between the electrolyte and photoelectrodes [31]. Thus, to increase the conversion efficiency of the semiconductor nanocrystal-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes, considerable efforts have been made to suppress the charge recombination between the electrolyte and electrode. One common method for decreasing the charge recombination is to interpose an intermediate layer, such as a ZnS coating, between the inorganic nanocrystals and the electrolyte. Besides, another effective method, interposing an energy barrier layer between the TiO2 and electrolyte, has been recently reported. For example, a ZnO layer was deposited on the TiO2 photoelectrodes to significantly decrease the charge recombination in CdSe [32], CdS [17], and Ag2S [33] nanocrystal-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes. Similarly, a CuInS2 nanocrystal film was formed between the TiO2 photoelectrode and CdS to suppress the charge recombination in CuInS2-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes [19]. Among these reported nanocrystals, Ag2S has a narrow band gap of 0.9 to 1.05 eV and a larger absorption coefficient, which makes it an important material for photovoltaic application [3335]. Furthermore, for these reported nanocrystals, the most commonly employed synthetic methods include solution synthesis [18, 36, 37], chemical bath deposition (CBD) [17, 33], and successive ionic layer absorption and reaction (SILAR) [14]. For example, the Ag2S [20, 33] and CdS [17, 19] nanocrystals are commonly prepared by a CBD method.

Unlike most of the previous studies, herein, both Ag2S and CdS nanocrystals were synthesized through a spin coating method of using a molecular-based precursor solution. In this study, we have successfully interposed an Ag2S nanocrystal film by the molecular precursor decomposition (MPD) method as an energy barrier layer between the TiO2 nanocrystal film on the transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate (i.e., TiO2/ITO photoelectrode) and CdS nanocrystals. The main advantage of the MPD method is that it allows a greater deposition amount of nanocrystals and avoids the detachment of nanocrystals from the TiO2 photoelectrodes compared to CBD or SILAR method. The schematic diagram and energy diagram of prepared CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO photoelectrode are shown in Figure 1. Our results demonstrated that the Ag2S nanocrystal film not only increases the light absorption of the CdS-sensitized TiO2/ITO photoelectrode but also effectively decreases the charge recombination between the TiO2 and electrolyte, which significantly enhanced the energy conversion efficiency of CdS-sensitized TiO2/ITO photoelectrode.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram (a) and energy diagram (b) of the CdS/Ag 2 S/TiO 2 /ITO electrode.

Methods

Materials

Cadmium chloride (CdCl2, 98.0%) was purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. Titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4, 99.995%), nitric acid (HNO3, 70%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), ethyl cellulose (CAS 9004-57-3), silver acetate (AgOAc, 99%), thiourea (≥99.0%), terpineol (≥96%), Ti(OCH2CH2CH2CH3)4 (Ti(OBu)4, 97%), 1-butylamine (99.5%), and 1-propionic acid (≥99.5%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the reagents were used without further purification. Indium tin oxide coated glass slides (ITO, ≤15 Ω/sq, Wuhu Token Sci. Co., Ltd., Wuhu, China) were cleaned by successive sonication in deionized water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol and then dried with nitrogen gas.

Formation of TiO2 nanocrystalline film on ITO substrate

First, a TiO2 dense layer was introduced on the cleaned ITO substrate by spin coating a TiO2 sol-gel precursor at 3,000 rpm for 60 s. The procedure for the preparation of TiO2 sol-gel has been reported previously [38]. Briefly, 10 ml Ti(OBu)4 was dissolved in 60 ml ethanol and stirred about 5 min at room temperature. After that, 5 ml acetyl acetone was added and stirring was continued for 15 min. Then, a solution composed of 30 ml ethanol, 10 ml deionized (DI) water, and 2 ml HCl with a density of 0.28 mol/l was added dropwise under vigorous stirring. The final mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h to obtain a TiO2 sol-gel precursor. The substrates were annealed at 450°C for 2 h in a muffle furnace.

Secondly, the TiO2 nanocrystalline film was deposited on the prepared TiO2 dense layer. The solution-processed nanocrystalline titanium (TiO2) film was prepared as follows. A total of 2 g of titanium nanoparticles (TiO2 P25, Degussa, Frankfurt, Germany) was initially dissolved in 100 mL HNO3 solution (0.1 mol/L) and stirred for 12 h at 200°C. Afterward, the obtained solution was centrifuged at 7,000 rpm for 3 min to collect the TiO2 nanoparticles. To remove the remaining water and acid, the obtained TiO2 nanoparticles were re-dispersed in DI water and then the mixture was centrifuged at 7,000 rpm for 3 min. This washing step was repeated three times. The final product was dried at room temperature to get dried TiO2 nanoparticles. After that, the TiO2 paste consisting of 11.6% dried TiO2 nanoparticles and 5% ethyl cellulose in terpineol was prepared, which was spin cast on the TiO2 dense layer at 2,000 rpm. Then, the samples were annealed at 500°C for 30 min in a muffle furnace to obtain the TiO2/ITO films.

Synthesis of Ag2S and CdS nanocrystals

Ag2S nanocrystals were synthesized through a method of using a molecular-based precursor solution. First, AgOAc (0.1 mmol) and thiourea (0.2 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of 1-butylamine (0.7 mL) and 1-propionic acid (45 μL) under a nitrogen atmosphere in a glove box (O2 < 0.1 ppm, H2O <0.1 ppm). The mixture was then stirred for 3 min; after which, the obtained Ag2S precursor solution was then spin cast onto the prepared TiO2/ITO substrates at 1,500 rpm for 30 s. The obtained films were calcined at 150°C for 10 min and then heated to 250°C and held 15 min at this temperature to obtain the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films. The CdS nanocrystals were synthesized through the same process. Briefly, the prepared CdS precursor solution composed of 0.1 mmol CdCl2 and thiourea (0.3 mmol) was spin cast onto the prepared Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films at 1,500 rpm for 30 s and then the films were calcined. Such a spinning-drying cycle was repeated several times to increase the thickness of the CdS film. The CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film after n cycles of the CdS deposition was denoted as CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO. The schematic diagram of CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is shown in Figure 1b. For comparison, the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO films without Ag2S were also fabricated by the same process.

Characterization and photovoltaic measurements

The structural and optical analyses of the prepared films were studied by X-ray diffractometer (XRD; DX-2500, Dandong Fangyuan Instrument Co., Ltd., Dandong, China) and UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), respectively. The surface morphologies were observed by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) (SEM, JSM-7001 F, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Photoelectrochemical experiments were performed using an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, Shanghai Chenhua Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) using a three-electrode configuration with the as-prepared samples as working electrode, a Pt foil counter electrode, and a saturated Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and devices were illuminated with a calibrated AM 1.5 solar light simulator (Newport Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) operating at an intensity of 100 mW cm−2. The light intensity was calibrated with a monocrystalline Si reference cell. The electrolyte was 1.0 M Na2S aqueous solution. The photocurrent responses of the working electrodes with a surface area of 0.5 cm−2 were recorded during a voltage sweep from −1.4 to 0.2 V.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the typical surface SEM images of the prepared TiO2/ITO, Ag2S/TiO2/ITO, and CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films. Figure 2a,b shows the top-view SEM images of the TiO2/ITO film. As shown in Figure 2a, the entire surface of the TiO2/ITO film is covered with TiO2 nanoparticles and is porous. Figure 2b shows a high magnification of the TiO2/ITO film, which clearly shows that the TiO2 nanoparticles with average diameters of approximately 25 nm are not uniformly distributed and the aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles is observed. In addition, many nanoscale pinholes are distributed among the TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface of the TiO2/ITO film.
Figure 2

Top-view SEM images at low and high magnifications. TiO2/ITO (a, b), Ag2S/TiO2/ITO (c, d), and CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO (e, f) electrodes.

Figure 2c,d shows the top-view SEM images of the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film. Figure 2c shows that, after the deposition of Ag2S, the number of the pinholes in the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film is significantly reduced and the surface of the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film became more flat compared to that of the TiO2/ITO film, which might be due to the filling of the Ag2S precursor solution in the low surface regions of the TiO2/ITO film. After the calcinations, more Ag2S nanocrystals that resulted from the Ag2S precursor solution aggregated in the low surface regions of the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film and therefore improved the flatness of the film surface. This explanation can be supported by the higher magnification SEM image (Figure 2d) of the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film. Figure 2d shows that the Ag2S nanocrystals appear to be fused together. In particular, the Ag2S nanocrystals in the low surface regions become fused together to form solid blocks.

Figure 2e,f shows the top-view SEM images of the CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film. As shown in Figure 2e, after introduction of three cycles of CdS deposition, a large amount of CdS nanocrystals are deposited on the surface of the CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film, and these deposited CdS nanocrystals are further fused together, which causes a large reduction in the number of pinholes. In addition, some lumps appear on the surface of the CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film. Obviously, these lumps should be CdS that resulted from the residual CdS precursor solution on the surface of the film after the calcinations at 250°C. The corresponding high-magnification SEM image of the CdS(3)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film shown in Figure 2f further reveals that the CdS nanocrystals become fused together, which is similar to the case of Ag2S nanocrystals in the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film.

Figure 3a,b,c shows the cross-sectional SEM images of the TiO2/ITO, Ag2S/TiO2/ITO, and CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films, respectively. From Figure 3a, it can be clearly seen that the average thickness of the TiO2 layer on the ITO substrate is about 350 nm. After the deposition of Ag2S nanocrystals, the average thickness (Figure 3b) of the Ag2S/TiO2 layer increases to about 420 nm. Moreover, it can be observed that, compared with the TiO2 layer, the Ag2S/TiO2 layer is more uniform and more compact, which is in agreement with the SEM results (Figure 2a,b,c,d). Similarly, after introduction of one cycle of CdS deposition, the CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2 layer results in an increased thickness of about 500 nm and improvements in the uniformity and compactness of the film. Figure 3d shows the EDX spectra on the region of the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film cross section. The EDX spectra reveals that the atomic composition of O, S, Ag, Cd, and Ti is 36.54%, 21.16%, 4.00%, 19.25%, and 19.05%, respectively. Therefore, the atomic ratio of Ti and O is close to 1:2, corresponding to the formation of TiO2. Besides, the difference between the atomic composition of S and that of Cd is 1.91%, which is about 0.5 times the atomic composition of Ag. Therefore, the EDX spectra and quantitative analysis results indicate that the TiO2, Ag2S, and CdS are formed.
Figure 3

SEM images and EDX spectra of electrodes. Cross-sectional SEM images of (a) TiO2/ITO, (b) Ag2S/TiO2/ITO, and (c) CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes and (d) EDX spectra of the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode.

The crystalline phases of the prepared CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film were characterized by XRD, as shown in Figure 4a. The magnified XRD patterns for 2θ between 23° and 52° is shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen that, for the prepared TiO2 layer, the diffraction peak at 2θ = 25.28° is observed, which can be indexed to the (101) lattice plane of anatase TiO2 (PDF# 21-1272). Besides, the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 35.30° and 48.68° are observed, which are ascribed to the (−402) and (402) lattice planes of the monoclinic phase of TiO2(B) (PDF# 46-1238), respectively. TiO2-B is a crystalline form of titania with a looser structure than anatase and rutile [39]. Therefore, the prepared TiO2 films are mixed phases of anatase and TiO2(B), which is similar to previous results [38, 40]. It has been reported that, compared to a single-crystalline TiO2, a monocline and anatase bi-crystalline TiO2 is more conducive to the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes in the TiO2 and therefore has better electrical properties [41, 42]. For the deposited Ag2S nanoparticles, the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 24.91°, 28.96°, 31.52°, and 50.73° are indexed to the (110), (111), (−112), and (−221) lattice planes of the monoclinic acanthite phase of Ag2S (α-Ag2S), respectively, which is in good agreement with the literature (PDF# 14-0072) [43, 44]. Moreover, the 2θ peaks observed at 2θ = 26.48°, 28.15°, 28.28°, and 43.87° exhibit the formation of the orthorhombic phase of CdS (PDF# 47-1179) which correspond to the (033), (042), (240), and (107) lattice planes of reflections, respectively. These results further confirm the formation of Ag2S and CdS.
Figure 4

XRD pattern of the CdS(1) /Ag 2 S /TiO 2 /ITO film. XRD pattern of the CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film (a) for 2θ between 10° and 80° and (b) for 2θ between 23° and 52°.

Figure 5 shows the UV-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra of the TiO2/ITO, Ag2S/TiO2/ITO, and CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO (n = 2 and 4). As shown in Figure 5, barely TiO2/ITO film absorbs mainly the ultraviolet light with wavelengths smaller than 400 nm. However, when the Ag2S nanocrystals were deposited on the TiO2/ITO film, the light absorbance extends to the visible light region from 400 to 800 nm, which is apparently due to the characteristic absorption of Ag2S [33]. After the CdS deposition, the absorbance of the spectra of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO increases in the 350- to 800-nm wavelength region compared to that of the Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film, which may mainly result from the light absorption of CdS nanocrystals and the CdS/Ag2S/TiO2 composite system with a lower band gap than that of CdS due to the electron coupling between the CdS/TiO2 heterostructure [17, 4547]. In particular, for the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film, the absorption peak located at about 515 nm is observed, which is the characteristic absorption of the band gap of bulk CdS. Similar absorption peak is also observed in the CdS/ZnO/TNT film [17]. Therefore, these results of UV-Vis measurement further confirm the formation of Ag2S and CdS. Furthermore, due to the increased adsorption amount of CdS nanocrystals, the light absorbance of the spectra of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films (n = 2 and 4) increases with the cycle number n. Additionally, for comparison, the absorption spectra of the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO films were also measured and used to compare with that of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films. As an example, the inset of Figure 5 shows the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO and CdS(1)/TiO2/ITO films. It can be clearly seen that the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO film is enhanced compared with the CdS(1)/TiO2/ITO film without Ag2S, which results from the light absorption of Ag2S nanocrystals. Apparently, the co-sensitized CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO films have enhancement effect in the light harvest, which is similar to the case of CdS and CuInS2 co-sensitized films [19].
Figure 5

UV-vis absorption spectra of TiO 2 / ITO, Ag 2 S/TiO 2 /ITO, and CdS( n ) /Ag 2 S /TiO 2 /ITO. UV-vis absorption spectra of the TiO2/ITO, Ag2S/TiO2/ ITO, and CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO (n =2 and 4) in the dark and under simulated AM 1.5 G sunlight irradiation (100 mW cm 2).

To investigate the influence of Ag2S film on the photoelectrochemisty property of CdS-sensitized TiO2/ITO electrodes, potentiodynamic scans on the TiO2/ITO, CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO, and CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO (n = 1, 2, and 4) electrodes were performed vs. a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode with a scanning rate of 10 mV s−1 in the dark and under simulated AM 1.5 G sunlight irradiation (100 mW cm−2) as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the dark current density of the TiO2/ITO electrode is negligible. Under AM 1.5 G sunlight irradiation, all electrodes show pronounced photoresponses. The open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the TiO2/ITO electrode is 1.28 V versus the Ag/AgCl electrode, which is comparable with that of the TiO2 nanotube (TNT) electrode [17]. After the CdS deposition, the Voc (1.29 V) of the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO electrodes does not change obviously, which is very close to that (about 1.3 V) of reported CdS(n)/TNT electrodes [17]. However, after the deposition of Ag2S on the TiO2 film, the Voc of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes decreases to about 1.0 V, which is in agreement with the obtained result from the Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized TNT electrodes [33]. The photocurrent density of the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO electrodes increases with increasing deposition cycles, which can be attributed to the increased amount of CdS that can induce a higher photocurrent density [17, 45]. For the same reason, a similar phenomenon is also observed in the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes. The most important point is that, for a certain cycle n and an applied potential V, the photocurrent density of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is much higher than that of the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO electrode when V > −0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl. The highest photocurrent density at short circuit (Jsc) achieved for the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is 5.92 mA cm−2, which is much larger than that (4.67 mA cm−2) of the CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrode. There may be two reasons for the increased photocurrent density of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes. The first reason might be the increased absorbance of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes. As shown in the inset of Figure 5, compared to the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO electrodes, the light absorbance of the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes increased in the presence of the Ag2S nanocrystals, which would result in an increased photocurrent density. The other reason is probably reduced recombination of photoinjected electrons with redox ions from the electrolyte in the CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes. Similar to the case of CdS(n)/TNT electrodes, the charge recombination in the CdS(n)/TNT electrodes can be effectively suppressed through the interposition of an energy barrier layer, such as ZnO [17] or CuInS2[19], between the TNTs and electrolyte. In our case, the recombination of photogenerated electrons with redox ions from the electrolyte may be blocked by the Ag2S between the TiO2 film and CdS nanocrystals, which can be typically represented by the dark current of the electrodes [19, 32]. Therefore, in order to investigate the influence of Ag2S on the charge recombination in the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO electrodes, the J-V characteristics of the CdS(n)/TiO2/ITO and CdS(n)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes in the dark are measured and compared. As an example, the J-V characteristics of the CdS(1)/TiO2/ITO and CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes in the dark are shown in Figure 7. It is surprising that, for the same applied potential V, the dark current density of the CdS(1)/TiO2/ITO electrode is much higher than that of CdS(1)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode, indicating that the incorporated Ag2S successfully reduced the charge recombination. Trying to explain this result would be an interesting work. According to common sense, the generated electrons in the CdS might not be effectively transferred to the Ag2S because the conduction band (CB) level of Ag2S is lower than that of TiO2 (Figure 1a). However, the efficient electron injection in Ag2S-sensitized TiO2 electrode has been experimentally found not only by us but also by others [23, 24, 33, 34, 48, 49]. Since the rate of electron transfer from electron donor to electron acceptor depends on the energetic overlap of electron donor and acceptor [50, 51], the reason for the electron transfer from α-Ag2S to TiO2 may be due to overlap of the electric states of α-Ag2S and TiO2 because the density of states of α-Ag2S can distribute in a wide energy range from −14 to 5 eV [52].
Figure 6

J-V characteristics of the TiO 2 /ITO, CdS( n ) /TiO 2 /ITO, and CdS( n ) /Ag 2 S /TiO 2 /ITO ( n = 1, 2, and 4) electrodes.

Figure 7

J-V characteristics of the CdS(1)/TiO 2 /ITO and CdS(1)/Ag 2 S/TiO 2 /ITO electrodes in the dark.

The light-chemical energy conversion efficiencies (η) of the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO and CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrodes as a function of applied potential (vs. Ag/AgCl) under AM 1.5 G (100 mW/cm−2) illumination is calculated as η (%) = [(Total power output − Electric power input)/Light power input] × 100 (There are more details in [53]) [53], which is shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that an optimum energy conversion efficiency achieved by the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is 3.46%, which is about 2.5 times that (1.39%) of the CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrode. It should be mentioned that the obtained η here is lower than that of the reported CdS-sensitized TNT/Ti electrode [17]. The main reason may be that the deposition amount of CdS on the TNT/Ti substrate with a length of 30 μm is more than that of CdS on the TiO2 nanocrystalline film with a thickness of about 350 nm. As discussed above, the improved η of the CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrode should be due to the increased light absorption and reduced charge recombination resulting from the deposition of Ag2S.
Figure 8

The energy conversion efficiencies of the CdS(4)/TiO 2 /ITO and CdS(4)/Ag 2 S/TiO 2 /ITO electrodes.

Conclusions

To improve the efficiencies of CdS-sensitized TiO2/ITO electrodes, the CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes were prepared by the interposition of Ag2S nanocrystalline film between the CdS and TiO2 nanocrystals as an energy barrier layer and a light absorber, in which both Ag2S and CdS nanocrystals were synthesized through a spin coating method of using a molecular-based precursor solution. The deposited Ag2S nanocrystals not only enhance the light absorption of the CdS-sensitized TiO2/ITO electrodes but also reduce the charge recombination, which resulted in the improved efficiencies of the CdS/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrodes. The maximum efficiency of the CdS(4)/Ag2S/TiO2/ITO electrode is 3.46%, which is about 2.5 times that (1.39%) of the CdS(4)/TiO2/ITO electrode without a Ag2S layer. Our research results indicate that the approach may provide a strategy to improve the efficiency of QSSCs.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Henan University Distinguished Professor Startup Fund, the Natural Science Foundation of Henan University (2013YBZR046), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Talent Training Fund of Henan (U1404616), and the Seed Fund of Young Scientific Research Talents of Henan University (0000A40540).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Henan Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, Henan University
(2)
School of Physics and Electronics, Henan University

References

  1. Grundmann M: Nano-optoelectronics: Concepts, Physics and Devices. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Li GS, Wu L, Li F, Xu PP, Zhang DQ, Li HX: Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants via a CdS quantum dots enhanced TiO2 nanotube array electrode under visible light irradiation. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 2118–2125. 10.1039/c3nr34253kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Song YY, Gao ZD, Wang JH, Xia XH, Lynch R: Multistage coloring electrochromic device based on TiO2 nanotube arrays modified with WO3 nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater 2011, 21: 1941–1946. 10.1002/adfm.201002258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen H, Fu WY, Yang HB, Sun P, Zhang YY, Wang LR, Zhao WY, Zhou XM, Zhao H, Jing QA, Qi XF, Li YX: Photosensitization of TiO2 nanorods with CdS quantum dots for photovoltaic devices. Electrochim Acta 2010, 56: 919–924. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Daghrir R, Drogui P, Robert D: Modified TiO2 for environmental photocatalytic applications: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52: 3581–3599.Google Scholar
  6. He H, Liu C, Dubois KD, Jin T, Louis ME, Li G: Enhanced charge separation in nanostructured TiO2 materials for photocatalytic and photovoltaic applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012, 51: 11841–11849. 10.1021/ie300510nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Roh DK, Chi WS, Jeon H, Kim SJ, Kim JH: Dye-sensitized solar cells: high efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells assembled with hierarchical anatase pine tree-like TiO2 nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater 2014, 24: 270–270. 10.1002/adfm.201470016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi HM, Ji IA, Bang JH: Metal selenides as a new class of electrocatalysts for quantum dot sensitized solar cells: a tale of Cu1.8Se and PbSe. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2014, 6: 2333–2341.Google Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Pedro V, Shen Q, Jovanovski V, Gimenez S, Tena-Zaera R, Toyoda T, Mora-Sero I: Ultrafast characterization of the electron injection from CdSe quantum dots and dye N719 co-sensitizers into TiO2 using sulfide based ionic liquid for enhanced long term stability. Electrochim Acta 2013, 100: 35–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim H, Jeong H, An TK, Park CE, Yong K: Hybrid-type quantum-dot cosensitized ZnO nanowire solar cell with enhanced visible-light harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2013, 5: 268–275. 10.1021/am301960hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hachiya S, Shen Q, Toyoda T: Effect of ZnS coatings on the enhancement of the photovoltaic properties of PbS quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J Appl Phys 2012, 111: 104315. 10.1063/1.4720468View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yu WW, Qu L, Guo W, Peng X: Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals. Chem Mater 2003, 15: 2854–2860. 10.1021/cm034081kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorer S, Hodes G: Quantum size effects in the study of chemical solution deposition mechanisms of semiconductor films. J Phys Chem 1994, 98: 5338–5346. 10.1021/j100071a026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna MC, Nozik AJ: Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers. J Appl Phys 2006, 100: 074510. 10.1063/1.2356795View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bang JH, Kamat PV: Quantum dot sensitized solar cells. A tale of two semiconductor nanocrystals: CdSe and CdTe. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 1467–1476. 10.1021/nn900324qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yu XY, Lei BX, Kuang DB, Su CY: Highly efficient CdTe/CdS quantum dot sensitized solar cells fabricated by a one-step linker assisted chemical bath deposition. Chem Sci 2011, 2: 1396–1400. 10.1039/c1sc00144bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen C, Xie Y, Ali G, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of CdS quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array using ZnO energy barrier layer. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 015202. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/1/015202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li TL, Lee YL, Teng HS: CuInS2 quantum dots coated with CdS as high-performance sensitizers for TiO2 electrodes in photoelectrochemical cells. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 5089–5098. 10.1039/c0jm04276eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen C, Ali G, Yoo SH, Kum JM, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of CdS quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 nanotube-arrays using CuInS2 as a co-sensitizer and an energy barrier layer. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 16430–16435. 10.1039/c1jm13616jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ji GQ, Liu ZQ, Guan DB, Yang YT: Ag2S quantum dots and N3 dye co-sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays for a solar cell. Appl Surf Sci 2013, 282: 695–699.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shen HP, Jiao XJ, Oron D, Li JB, Lin H: Efficient electron injection in non-toxic silver sulfide (Ag2S) sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 2013, 240: 8–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang I, Seol M, Kim H, Yong K: Improvement of photocurrent generation of Ag2S sensitized solar cell through co-sensitization with CdS. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 103: 023902. 10.1063/1.4813445View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Xie Y, Heo SH, Kim YN, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Synthesis and visible-light-induced catalytic activity of Ag2S-coupled TiO2 nanoparticles and nanowires. Nanotechnology 2010, 21: 015703. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/1/015703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Xie Y, Yoo SH, Chen C, Cho SO: Ag2S quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrodes. Mater Sci Eng B 2012, 177: 106–111. 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tao L, Xiong Y, Liu H, Shen WZ: High performance PbS quantum dot sensitized solar cells via electric field assisted in situ chemical deposition on modulated TiO2 nanotube arrays. Nanoscale 2014, 6: 931–938. 10.1039/c3nr04461kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. McDonald SA, Konstantatos G, Zhang S, Cyr PW, Klem EJ, Levina L, Sargent EH: Solution-processed PbS quantum dot infrared photodetectors and photovoltaics. Nat Mater 2005, 4: 138–142. 10.1038/nmat1299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yella A, Lee HW, Tsao HN, Yi CY, Chandiran AK, Nazeeruddin MK, Diau EWG, Yeh CY, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M: Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science 2011, 334: 629–634. 10.1126/science.1209688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wagner K, Griffith MJ, James M, Mozer AJ, Wagner P, Triani G, Officer DL, Wallace GG: Significant performance improvement of porphyrin-sensitized TiO2 solar cells under white light illumination. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 317–326. 10.1021/jp107615hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang M, Wang Y, Xu M, Ma W, Li R, Wang P: Design of high-efficiency organic dyes for titania solar cells based on the chromophoric core of cyclopentadithiophene-benzothiadiazole. Energ Environ Sci 2013, 6: 2944–2949. 10.1039/c3ee42331jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon S-J, Humphry-Baker R, Gao PK, Nazeeruddin M, Grätzel M: Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499: 316–319. 10.1038/nature12340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mora-SeróI Giménez S, Fabregat-Santiago F, Gómez R, Shen Q, Toyoda T, Bisquert J: Recombination in quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Accounts Chem Res 2009, 42: 1848–1857. 10.1021/ar900134dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee W, Kang SH, Kim JY, Kolekar GB, Sung YE, Han SH: TiO2 nanotubes with a ZnO thin energy barrier for improved current efficiency of CdSe quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 335706. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/33/335706View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen C, Xie Y, Ali G, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanotubes with a ZnO recombination barrier layer. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 462. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-462View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tubtimtae A, Wu KL, Tung HY, Lee MW, Wang GJ: Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 1158–1160. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.06.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hu HW, Ding JN, Zhang S, Li Y, Bai L, Yuan NY: Photodeposition of Ag2S on TiO2 nanorod arrays for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 10. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cheng K, Fang Z, Ma YF, Zhang H: Near-infrared emitting Ag2S-CdS core-shell quantum dots in aqueous solution. Chinese J Inorg Chem 2013, 29: 326–332.Google Scholar
  37. Yue WJ, Han SK, Peng RX, Shen W, Geng HW, Wu F, Tao SW, Wang MT: CuInS2 quantum dots synthesized by a solvothermal route and their application as effective electron acceptors for hybrid solar cells. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 7570–7578. 10.1039/c0jm00611dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tao C, Ruan SP, Zhang XD, Xie GH, Shen L, Kong XZ, Dong W, Liu CX, Chen WY: Performance improvement of inverted polymer solar cells with different top electrodes by introducing a MoO3 buffer layer. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 193307. 10.1063/1.3026741View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Chen SS, Zhu YH, Li W, Liu WJ, Li LC, Yang ZH, Liu C, Yao WJ, Lu XH, Feng X: Synthesis, features, and applications of mesoporous titania with TiO2(B). Chin J Catal 2010, 31: 605–614. 10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60073-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Shen SF, Chang MJ, Liu YH, Pan HB, Chen NS: Hydrothermal preparation of a monocline and anatase bi-crystalline TiO2 and the phase transformation mechanism. Chinese J Inorg Chem 2012, 28: 1099–1104.Google Scholar
  41. Zhu J, Zhang J, Chen F, Anpo M: Preparation of high photocatalytic activity TiO2 with a bicrystalline phase containing anatase and TiO2 (B). Mater Lett 2005, 59: 3378–3381. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.05.072View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang DJ, Liu HW, Zheng ZF, Yuan Y, Zhao JC, Waclawik ER, Ke XB, Zhu HY: An efficient photocatalyst structure: TiO2(B) nanofibers with a shell of anatase nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 17885–17893. 10.1021/ja906774kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodriguez AN, Nair MTS, Nair PK: Structural, optical and electrical properties of chemically deposited silver sulfide thin films. Semicond Sci Tech 2005, 20: 576–585. 10.1088/0268-1242/20/6/017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Li PX, Li Z, Zhang LH, Shi EZ, Shang YY, Cao AY, Li HB, Jia Y, Wei JQ, Wang KL, Zhu HW, Wu DH: Bubble-promoted assembly of hierarchical, porous Ag2S nanoparticle membranes. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 24721–24726. 10.1039/c2jm35048cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Chi C-F, Lee Y-L, Weng H-S: A CdS-modified TiO2 nanocrystalline photoanode for efficient hydrogen generation by visible light. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 125704. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/12/125704View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Chen C, Li F, Li G, Tan F, Li S, Ling L: Double-sided transparent electrodes of TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly efficient CdS quantum dot-sensitized photoelectrodes. J Mater Sci 2014, 49: 1868–1874. 10.1007/s10853-013-7875-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ahmed R, Will G, Bell J, Wang H: Size-dependent photodegradation of CdS particles deposited onto TiO2 mesoporous films by SILAR method. J Nanopart Res 2012, 14: 1140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gholami M, Qorbani M, Moradlou O, Naseri N, Moshfegh AZ: Optimal Ag2S nanoparticle incorporated TiO2 nanotube array for visible water splitting. Rsc Adv 2014, 4: 7838–7844. 10.1039/c3ra44898cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tubtimtae A, Lee MW: Optical and photovoltaic properties of CdS/Ag2S quantum dots co-sensitized-solar cells. Eco-Materials Processing and Design Xiv 2013, 761: 15–18.Google Scholar
  50. Marcus RA: Chemical and electrochemical electron-transfer theory. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1964, 15: 155–196. 10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Gerischer H: Charge transfer processes at semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces in connection with problems of catalysis. Surf Sci 1969, 18: 97–122. 10.1016/0039-6028(69)90269-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun SR, Xia DG: An ab-initio calculation study on the super ionic conductors alpha-AgI and Ag2X (X = S, Se) with BCC structure. Solid State Ion 2008, 179: 2330–2334. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.09.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Khan SU, Al-Shahry M, Ingler WB: Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science 2002, 297: 2243–2245. 10.1126/science.1075035View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement