Open Access

Characterizing the electrical properties of raised S/D junctionless thin-film transistors with a dual-gate structure

  • Ya-Chi Cheng1,
  • Hung-Bin Chen1, 2,
  • Jun-Ji Su1,
  • Chi-Shen Shao2,
  • Cheng-Ping Wang1,
  • Chun-Yen Chang2 and
  • Yung-Chun Wu1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:669

Received: 30 June 2014

Accepted: 26 November 2014

Published: 11 December 2014


This letter demonstrates a p-type raised source-and-drain (raised S/D) junctionless thin-film transistors (JL-TFTs) with a dual-gate structure. The raised S/D structure provides a high saturation current (>1 μA/μm). The subthreshold swing (SS) is 100 mV/decade and the drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) is 0.8 mV/V, and the Ion/Ioff current ratio is over 108 A/A for Lg = 1 μm. Using a thin channel structure obtains excellent performance in the raised S/D structure. Besides the basic electrical characteristics, the dual-gate structure can also be used to adjust Vth in multi-Vth circuit designs. This study examines the feasibility of using JL-TFTs in future three-dimensional (3D) layer-to-layer stacked high-density device applications.


Junctionless (JL)Thin-film transistor (TFT)Raised source-and-drain (raised S/D)Dual-gateReliability


Recently, the concept of the junctionless (JL) field-effect transistor (FET), which contains a heavily, uniformly, and homogeneously doping species in the channel and source/drain (S/D), has been intensively studied [14]. The JL device is intrinsically a gated resistor, i.e., a resistor with a gate for controlling the carrier density and the current flow. The advantages of JL devices include (1) avoidance of the use of an ultra-shallow source/drain junction, which greatly simplifies the process flow, (2) low thermal budgets owing to implant activation annealing after the gate stack formation is eliminated, and (3) the current transport is in the bulk of the semiconductor, which reduces the impact of imperfect semiconductor/insulator interfaces. These features have also been demonstrated with poly-Si thin-film transistor (TFT) [57], which are suitable for monolithic three-dimensional (3D) vertically stacked integrated circuits (ICs), which continue the applicability of Moore’s law [8]. However, the JL channel thickness should be thin enough to turn off the JL devices. This limits the saturation current of the junctionless thin-film transistor (JL-TFT) [7, 9]. Meanwhile, it adversely increases series resistance in the S/D and decreases drain current. In order to conquer this issue, the raised source-and-drain (raised S/D) structure is used for this works.

In this work, the thin-channel structure trimmed by oxidation and HF is used for turning off the devices, and the raised S/D structure is built for high saturation current. A dual-gate structure can be applied in multi-threshold voltage (multi-Vth) applications [10], and its temperature is discussed for the p-type raised S/D JL-TFTs.


Device fabrication and experiment

Figure 1a schematically presents the proposed device structure of the raised S/D JL-TFT, and Figure 1b shows the detailed process flows of the fabrication in the raised S/D JL-TFT. The p-type raised S/D JL-TFT is fabricated by initially growing a 400-nm thermal silicon dioxide layer on a 6-in. silicon wafer. A 40-nm amorphous Si (a-Si) layer was deposited by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) at 550°C. Then, the a-Si layer was formed by solid-phase recrystallized (SPC) process at 600°C for 24 h in nitrogen ambient. After borondifluoride (BF2) ion implantation with 30 keV at a dose of 2 × 1014 cm−2 for the p+ raised S/D doping followed by furnace annealing at 600°C for 4 h, the raised S/D is patterned by e-beam lithography. Subsequently, using the same method for the production of a-Si deposition (40 nm), the implantation (30 keV, BF2, 2 × 1014 cm−2) and the SPC process form the channel layer. While serving as a channel, the active layer was patterned by e-beam lithography and then anisotropically etched by time-controlled reactive ion etching (RIE). The patterned width of each nanosheet channel is 0.3 μm. Then, the active channel was mesa-etched by time-controlled wet etching of dilute HF to form the omega-shaped channel. Next, a sacrificial oxide as a trimming process was thermally grown at 900°C for 2 h, which consumes around 22-nm-thick poly-Si. Subsequently, the dry oxide of 20-nm thickness was deposited as the gate oxide layer, consuming around 10-nm-thick poly-Si to form a 7.35-nm-thick channel. The 150-nm-thick in situ doped n+ poly-silicon was deposited as a gate electrode and patterned by e-beam and RIE. Additionally, a 200-nm SiO2 passivation layer was deposited. Finally, a 300-nm-thick Al-Si-Cu metallization was performed and sintered at 400°C for 30 min.
Figure 1

Device structure and detailed process flow of the fabrication. (a) The device structure for the raised S/D p-type JL-TFTs. (b) The detailed process flow of the fabrication in the raised S/D JL-TFTs. The positions A and A’ indicate the cross-section of the channel.

Results and discussion

Figure 2a shows the cross-sectional transmission electron microscopic (TEM) image along the AA’ direction, as shown in Figure 1a. Figure 2b,c displays the enlarged images of Figure 2a. The nano-sheet channel of the raised S/D structure is covered by the omega-gate electrode, which is expected to improve electrostatic gate control and achieve superior performance [11]. Figure 2c clearly shows that the nano-sheet channel thickness is 7.35 nm, and the TEM photograph shows that the single-crystal-like channel with large grain size is expected to achieve superior performance because of the oxidation trimming process. The channel region is doped with a boron concentration of 4 × 1019 cm−3. Figure 3a plots the transfer Id-Vg characteristics of the raised S/D JL-TFT with Lg = 0.5 μm. The on current (Ion) is defined as the drain current at Vg = −6 V for the raised S/D JL-TFT. The off current (Ioff) is defined as the lowest drain current. The excellent transfer characteristics of the raised S/D JL-TFT with Lg = 0.5 μm include the following: (1) subthreshold swing (SS) = 100 mV/decade, (2) DIBL = 0.8 mV/V, and (3) Ion/Ioff current ratio = 3.85 × 108. Figure 3b shows the Id-Vd output characteristics of the raised S/D JL-TFT. The on resistance is low at various over-drive voltages with the raised S/D structure. Figure 4a demonstrates the temperature dependence of the raised S/D JL-TFT. Based on the Id-Vg curves in Figure 4a, Figure 4b presents the measured SS and threshold voltage (Vth) as functions of temperature at Vd = −0.3 V. This figure reveals that, as the temperature increases, the absolute Vth value decreases and the SS increases. The positive shifting of Vth for the raised S/D device is discussed in Figure 4b. The Vth is defined as the gate voltage at Id = 10−9 A. The Vth equation could be presented as the following [12]:
V t h = V f b + q N A W D 2 ϵ Si + q N A W ch W D C ox π 2 2 2 q m h * 1 T ch 2 + 1 W ch 2
where Vfb is the flat-band voltage, Cox is the gate capacitance per unit of length, NA is the carrier concentration, WD is the depletion width, Wch is the effective channel width, Tch is the channel thickness, and mh* is the effective mass of the confined holes. When the device is heated, the bandgap (Eg) decreases. Therefore, NA increases. For the above reasons, absolute Vth is expected to decrease with increasing temperature. Notably, the temperature dependence of the threshold voltage for the poly-channel device is 1.4 mV/°C. This value is close to the Vth temperature dependence of the single-crystal channel (1.65 mV/°C) [13].
Figure 2

TEM images of the raised S/D channel. (a) The cross-sectional TEM images of the raised S/D channel along the AA’ direction with Lg = 0.5 μm. (b) The enlarged TEM images in (a) with omega-gate structure. (c) The enlarged TEM images in (b) with Tch = 7.35 nm and fin width = 0.3 μm.

Figure 3

I d - V g characteristics and I d - V d curve. (a) The transfer Id-Vg characteristics and (b) Id-Vd curve in the raised S/D JL-TFTs with Lg = 0.5 μm at Vd = −0.3 V.

Figure 4

Temperature dependence and measured SS and threshold voltage. (a) Temperature dependence (25°C to 200°C) on Id-Vg characteristics at Vd = −0.3 V for the raised S/D JL-TFTs. (b) The dependence of sub-threshold swing (SS) and threshold voltage (Vth) between various temperatures for the p-type raised S/D devices.

Figure 5 shows the dual-gate structure with different operation modes. In mode 1, G1 is sweeping, G2 has an off-state bias condition, and Vd is applied at −0.3 V. In mode 2, G1 is sweeping, and G2 has an on-state bias condition. The reverse conditions for G1 and G2 occur in mode 3 and mode 4. Figure 6 shows the Id-Vg characteristics. The red line represents that G1 is floating and G2 is sweeping. The blue line represents that G1 connects G2 and they are sweeping simultaneously. The experimental data show a good match in the Id-Vg curves, which indicates that the series resistance between G1 and G2 is insignificant and does not degrade electrical performance. The inset in Figure 6 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the dual-gate structure. The distance between the dual gate is 0.5 μm. Figure 7 depicts the Id-Vg curves for different operation modes. The electrical performances for mode 1 and mode 2 are similar to those for mode 3 and mode 4 at Vd = −0.3 V. Figure 7a,c shows that, when the G2 and G1 approaches off-state bias condition, the on current is clearly pinning and absolute Vth is increasing. Figure 7b,d shows that, when the G2 and G1 approaches on-state bias condition, the on current is increasing and the absoute Vth is decreasing. In Figure 8a, the Vth can be adjusted by the dual-gate structure applying different gate bias. In Figure 8b, the Vth sensitivity of G2 bias is approximately 1.23 V/V, and the experimental data show that the relationship is linear. The detailed results are discussed by 3D TCAD simulation in Figure 9. To obtain accurate numerical results for a nanometer-scale device, the device is simulated by solving 3D quantum-corrected equations using the commercial tool, Synopsys Sentaurus Device [14]. In quantum-corrected equations, a density gradient model is used in the simulation, as listed below [15, 16]:
n = N c F 1 / 2 E F , n E c Λ n K T n Λ n = γ 2 12 m n 2 ln n + 1 2 ln n 2
where n is the electron concentration, Nc is the effective density of states of the conduction band (Ec), F1/2 is the Fermi-Dirac integral, μn is the effective mass of the electron, and T n is the electron temperature. The bandgap narrowing model, the band-to-band tunneling model, and the Shockley-Read-Hall recombination with the doping-dependent model are also considered. The direct tunneling model is not utilized because high-k/metal-gate technology is used. The mobility model used in the device simulation is according to Mathiessen’s rule, which is expressed as
1 μ = D μ surf _ aps + D μ surf _ rs + 1 μ bulk _ dop
where D = exp(x/lcrit), x is the distance from the interface, and lcrit is a fitting parameter. The mobility consists of three parts: 1) surface acoustic phonon scattering (μsurf_aps), 2) surface roughness scattering (μsurf_rs), and 3) bulk mobility with doping-dependent modification (μbulk_dop). The details are described in [14, 17]. Figure 9a shows the high off current when G1 is sweeping at 2 V and G2 is at on-state bias of −3.5 V. When the G2 is in extreme on-state, band-to-band tunneling occurs easily according to the simulation results. Figure 9b shows the pinning mechanism when G1 is sweeping and G2 is at off-state bias. When the G2 voltage approaches off-state, the valence band will be dropped off, which retards the hole transport and causes a saturation current. Figure 10 shows the temperature characteristics of the dual-gate structure. High-temperature performance is similar to that at room temperature.
Figure 5

Schematic of the measured raised S/D devices with dual-gate structure. The various modes at different bias conditions for the dual-gate structure.

Figure 6

The transfer I d - V g characteristics of different gate connections. The inset shows the SEM image of the dual-gate structure.

Figure 7

The transfer I d - V g characteristics for various modes (a-d), listed in Figure 5 .

Figure 8

Transfer I d - V g characteristics and G2 bias dependence. (a) The transfer Id-Vg characteristics at different G2 gate bias. (b) The impact of G2 bias dependence on the Vth for the raised S/D JL-TFTs.

Figure 9

Simulation results at (a) G1 = 1 V, G2 = −4 V for mode 2 situation and (b) G1 = −4 V, G2 = 1 V for mode 1 situation.

Figure 10

The temperature dependence of dual-gate JL-TFTs at 100°C on I d - V g characteristics (a-d).


This work realizes the p-type raised S/D JL-TFTs and dual-gate structure. In our devices, the thin channel formed by the oxidation trimming process and raise S/D structure are used. Due to these two ideas, the high on current (>1 μA/μm), low off current (10−14 A), and small SS (100 mV/decade) could be achieved. It is a promising structure to get a good-performance JL device and conquer the low-Ion issue of JL devices. The temperature of the raised S/D devices is discussed for the electrical parameters (SS, Vth). It is worthy to notice that the dual-gate structure can be used to adjust Vth to fulfill the multi-Vth circuit designs. The devices are highly promising for future further scaling and 3D stacked IC applications.



The authors would like to acknowledge the National Science Council of Taiwan for supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 103-2221-E-007 -114 -MY3. The National Nano Device Laboratories is greatly appreciated for its technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University
Department of Electronics Engineering, Institute of Electronics, National Chiao Tung University


  1. Lee CW, Afzalian A, Akhavan ND, Yan R, Ferain I, Colinge JP: Junctionless multigate field-effect transistor. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 053511. 10.1063/1.3079411View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Colinge JP, Lee CW, Afzalian A, Akhavan ND, Yan R, Ferain I, Razavi P, O'Neil B, Blake A, White M, Kelleher AM, McCarthy B, Murphy R: Nanowire transistors without junctions. Nat Nanotechnol 2010, 5: 225. 10.1038/nnano.2010.15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Colinge JP, Lee CW, Ferain I, Akhavan ND, Yan R, Razavi P, Yu R, Nazarov AN, Doria RT: Reduced electric field in junctionless transistors. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 073510. 10.1063/1.3299014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rios R, Cappellani A, Armstrong M, Budrevich A, Gomez H, Pai R, Rahhal-orabi N, Kuhn K: Comparison of junctionless and conventional trigate transistors with Lg down to 26 nm. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2011, 32: 1170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin HC, Lin CI, Huang TY: Characteristics of n-type junctionless poly-Si thin-film transistors with an ultrathin channel. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2012, 33: 53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Su CJ, Tsai TI, Liou YL, Lin ZM, Lin HC, Chao TS: Gate-all-around junctionless transistors with heavily doped polysilicon nanowire channels. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2011, 32: 521.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen HB, Chang CY, Lu NH, Wu JJ, Han MH, Cheng YC, Wu YC: Characteristics of gate-all-around junctionless poly-Si TFTs with an ultrathin channel. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2010, 34: 897.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi SJ, Han JW, Kim S, Moon DI, Jang M, Choi YK: A novel TFT with a laterally engineered bandgap for of 3D logic and flash memory. VLSI Symp Tech Dig 2010, 111. doi:10.1109/VLSIT.2010.5556191 doi:10.1109/VLSIT.2010.5556191Google Scholar
  9. Lin HC, Lin CI, Lin ZM, Shie BS, Huang TY: Characteristics of planar junctionless poly-Si thin-film transistors with various channel thickness. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2013, 60: 1142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kursun V, Friedman EG: Multi-voltage CMOS Circuit Design. New York: Wiley; 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Barraud S, Coquand R, Cassé M, Koyama M, Hartmann J-M, Maffini-Alvaro V, Comboroure C, Vizioz C, Aussenac F, Faynot O, Poiroux T: Performance of omega-shaped-gate silicon nanowire MOSFET with diameter down to 8 nm. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2012, 33: 1526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Trevisoli RD, Doria RT, De SM, Pavanello MA: Threshold voltage in junctionless nanowire transistors. Semicond Sci Technol 2011, 26: 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee CW, Borne A, Ferain I, Afzalian A, Yan R, Akhavan ND, Razavi P, Colinge JP: High-temperature performance of silicon junctionless MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2010, 57: 620.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Synopsys: TCAD Sentaurus Device, Ver. E-2010.12. Mountain View: Synopsys, Inc; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. Walker A, Jeffrey FW, Gilbert A, Karin H: User’s Manual for Synopsys Sentaurus Device. Ottawa; 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Ancona MG, Iafrate GJ: Quantum correction to the equation of state of an electron gas in a semiconductor. Phys Rev B 1989, 39: 9536. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9536View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Reggiani S, Valdinoci M, Colalongo L, Rudan M, Baccarani G, Stricker AD, Illien F, Felber N, Fichtner W, Zullino L: Electron and hole mobility in silicon at large operating temperatures. I. Bulk mobility. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2002, 49: 490. 10.1109/16.987121View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Cheng et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.