Open Access

The effect of free-standing GaN substrate on carrier localization in ultraviolet InGaN light-emitting diodes

  • Ming-Ta Tsai1,
  • Chung-Ming Chu1,
  • Che-Hsuan Huang2,
  • Yin-Hao Wu1,
  • Ching-Hsueh Chiu2, 3,
  • Zhen-Yu Li4Email author,
  • Po-Min Tu2, 3,
  • Wei-I Lee1 and
  • Hao-Chung Kuo2
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:675

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-675

Received: 29 June 2014

Accepted: 16 October 2014

Published: 13 December 2014

Abstract

In this study, we have grown 380-nm ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) based on InGaN/AlInGaN multiple quantum well (MQW) structures on free-standing GaN (FS-GaN) substrate by atmospheric pressure metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (AP-MOCVD), and investigated the relationship between carrier localization degree and FS-GaN. The micro-Raman shift peak mapping image shows low standard deviation (STD), indicating that the UV-LED epi-wafer of low curvature and MQWs of weak quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) were grown. High-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) analyses demonstrated high-order satellite peaks and clear fringes between them for the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate, from which the interface roughness (IRN) was estimated. The temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) measurement confirmed that the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate exhibited better carrier confinement. Besides, the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) mapping images verified that the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN have fairly uniform distribution of indium and more ordered InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structure. Clearly, the FS-GaN can not only improve the light output power but also reduce the efficiency droop phenomenon at high injection current. Based on the results mentioned above, the FS-GaN can offer UV-LEDs based on InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structures with benefits, such as high crystal quality and small carrier localization degree, compared with the UV-LEDs on sapphire.

Keywords

UltravioletLight-emitting diodesHomoepitaxiallyCarrier confinementExternal quantum efficiency

Background

The InGaN-based ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) with wavelength ranging from 350 to 400 nm have received enormous attention for practical application, such as bio-sensor, high density storage, and short-haul optical communication [1, 2]. Besides, the white-light LEDs (WLEDs) can be realized by using InGaN-based UV-LED chip which excited the phosphor of red, green, and blue (RGB) [3]. Compared with the case of white-light emission from yellow phosphor with blue LED chip, many researches pointed out that the InGaN-based UV-LED has many excellent properties, such as lower wavelength shift as increasing injection current, high luminous efficiency, white point determined by phosphor only, better color rendering, and stable light color. Nevertheless, there is still lack of a suitable substrate for InGaN-based UV-LED devices to develop fully their superiorities. Typically, the InGaN-based UV-LEDs were grown on sapphire substrate by hetero-epitaxial techniques, such as metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). However, the epitaxial layer of InGaN-based UV-LEDs still contains a high defect density (around 108 to 1010 cm-2) and large strain-induced piezoelectric field due to the large lattice mismatch and the difference in thermal expansion coefficients of GaN-based films and sapphire substrates, resulting in the reduction in the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of InGaN-based UV-LED devices. In other words, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) decreases drastically as the emission wavelength of UV-LEDs was below 400 nm. On the other hand, it was well known that the AlGaN alloy material was used as the quantum barrier (QB) of InGaN quantum wells (QWs) with low indium content to confine the electron carrier. But the two materials of AlGaN and InGaN are very different in growth temperature, which affects strongly on the quality of material and device performances. In order to overcome the problem of the above-mentioned, our group has replaced AlGaN barrier with AlInGaN quaternary material in InGaN/AlGaN MQW system, which demonstrated an improvement of 55% in output power and droop of 13% in efficiency. Besides, the AlInGaN quaternary barrier in UV-LEDs can not only improve the QB crystal quality but also increase the electron carrier concentration of QWs [48]. Additionally, it was believed that the optical and electrical properties of InGaN-based UV-LEDs were very sensitive to the defect density in the epilayer, suggesting that high crystalline quality epilayer could dramatically improve the device performance. The recent availability of free-standing GaN (FS-GaN) substrate with low defect density (about 106/cm2) could facilitate this development, which can enhance the light output power, IQE, and EQE of InGaN-based UV-LEDs.

Therefore, in order to further improve the performance of UV-LED devices based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structure, in the present study, we will introduce the FS-GaN substrate for the homo-epitaxial growth of high-quality InGaN-based UV-LED devices based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structure. We also examine the effect of FS-GaN on the growth of UV-LEDs based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structure with the characterizations of interface structure and optical properties being emphasized.

Methods

Fabrication of UV-LEDs

All UV-LEDs based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW epitaxial structure were grown by a commercial atmospheric pressure metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (AP-MOCVD) system (model: Nippon SR4000, Taiyo-Nippon Sanso) with a horizontal reactor in the same run. The MO compounds of TMGa, TMIn, TMAl, and gaseous NH3 were employed as the reactant source materials for Ga, In, Al, and N, respectively, and H2 and N2 were used as the carrier gas. The substrates employed herein were 2-in. FS-GaN with 300 μm in thickness, which was fabricated by hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE). The epitaxial structure of the UV-LEDs was grown on both substrates, comprising a 2.5-μm-thick n-GaN epilayer grown at 1,150°C, a 12-period InGaN/AlInGaN MQW active layer grown at 830°C, 15-nm-thick Mg-doped Al0.3Ga0.7N electron blocking layers (EBLs) grown at 1,030°C, and a 100-nm-thick p-GaN layer grown at 1,030°C. In addition, the growth of UV-LEDs based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW epitaxial structure on undoped GaN/sapphire template was also conducted for comparison. In order to compare both samples, we regrow the UV-LED epitaxial structure on the FS-GaN substrate firstly. We optimized the growth temperature of MQWs and then grow the same UV-LED epitaxial structure on the sapphire substrate based on the photoluminescence (PL) wavelength of the UV-LED epitaxial structure on the FS-GaN substrate. After epitaxial growth, the indium tin oxide (ITO) film (180 nm) was first deposited on the UV-LEDs as a transparent contact layer (TCL). Then, the surfaces of the UV-LEDs which were partially etched until the 1.5-μm depth of the n-GaN layers were exposed. We subsequently deposited Cr/Pt/Au (50 nm/50 nm/150 nm) onto the exposed n-GaN and p-GaN layers to serve as the n-type and p-type electrodes, respectively. After that, UV-LEDs were cut into square pieces with a dimension of 300 × 300 μm2. Finally, the blue LED chip was packaged by a vertical transparent package (VTP) to enhance light extraction efficiency [9]. The schematics of UV-LEDs based on InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structures on the FS-GaN substrate by using VTP is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Schematics of UV-LEDs based on InGaN/InAlGaN MQW structures on FS-GaN substrate by using VTP.

The surface morphology of UV-LED epilayers was observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a scanning area of 10 μm × 10 μm. The crystalline quality and interface of our epitaxial structures was evaluated by high-resolution double-crystal X-ray diffraction (HRXRD, D8) using Cu Kα radiation as the X-ray source (λ = 1.54056 Å). The room temperature Raman scattering was used to analyze the residual strain of GaN epitaxial layers and UV-LEDs. The interfacial microstructures and In distribution of the epilayer were observed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) mapping. The optical properties were investigated by temperature-dependent PL measurement. Finally, the light-current-voltage (L-I-V) characteristics of UV-LED devices were measured at room temperature under continuous-wave (CW) operation.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the AFM images for the UV-LEDs grown on FS-GaN and sapphire substrates. The root mean square (RMS) of UV-LEDs on sapphire was about 3.1 nm, as shown in Figure 2b. It can be seen that the RMS was decreased to 2.5 nm as the FS-GaN was used, as shown in Figure 2a. Besides, the uniform, well-defined, and long crystallographic steps can be observed on the top surface of UV-LEDs on FS-GaN, suggesting that the UV-LEDs based on InGaN/AlInGaN MQWs of excellent quality are grown. On the other hand, Figure 2c,d displays the micro-Raman mapping images of specimens, within a scanning area of 10 μm × 10 μm. In general, the Raman spectra show two Raman shift peaks: one can be attributed to the E2 (high) mode of the GaN epilayer and another can be attributed to the A1 (LO) mode of the GaN epilayer. Therefore, the average Raman shift peak of E2 (high) for the UV-LEDs grown on FS-GaN and sapphire substrates was located at around 567.8 and 570.4 cm-1, respectively. We can calculate the average strain value of specimen by Equation 1 [10]:
Figure 2

AFM and micro-Raman images for UV-LEDs grown on (a, c) FS-GaN and (b, d) sapphire substrates.

Δ ω = ω E 2 - ω 0 = C σ
(1)

where Δω is the Raman shift peak difference between the strained GaN epilayer and the strain-free GaN epilayer and C is the biaxial strain co-efficient, which is 2.25 cm-1/GPa [11]. The calculated in-plane compressive stress was about 0.71 and 1.86 GPa for the UV-LEDs grown on FS-GaN and sapphire substrates, respectively. Compared with the UV-LEDs on sapphire, the strain relaxation degree of the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN is about 62%. Additionally, the fluctuation of Raman shift peak over the area scanned is denoted as standard deviation (STD in cm-1). As can been seen, the STD of FS-GaN and sapphire case is estimated to be about 0.18 and 0.35 cm-1, respectively. It is obvious that compared with the UV-LEDs on sapphire samples, the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN showed a quite uniform Raman peak distribution over the region scanned, where the STD for the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN is only 0.18 cm-1. Consequently, we can expect that the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate have weaker quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) and small curvature [12].

Figure 3 shows the HRXRD ω/2θ scan for the InGaN/AlInGaN multi-quantum well (MQW) UV-LED epitaxial structures on (a) sapphire and (b) FS-GaN. The interface roughness (IRN) of MQW structures fabricated on these substrates was further analyzed by using Equation 2 [13, 14]:
Figure 3

(0002) reflection HRXRD ω/2θ curves of UV-LEDs grown on (a) sapphire and (b) FS-GaN substrates.

W n = W 0 + ln 2 1 2 n Δ θ M σ Λ
(2)

where n is the order of the satellite, Λ and σ/Λ are the period of satellite peak and IRN, respectively, ΔθM is the angle distance between adjacent satellite peaks, and W0 and W n are the full width at half maximum of the zeroth- and n th-order peaks, respectively. We can estimate that the IRN of the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate (1.6%) is smaller than that of the UV-LEDs grown on the sapphire substrate (2.7%). As indicated in ref. [13], the IRN of MQWs is affected by the defects, microstructure, and phase separation in MQWs. Therefore, our X-ray analysis results might manifest that the crystalline quality of the MQW epitaxial structure grown on the FS-GaN substrate is superior to those grown on sapphire substrates.

Figure 4 shows the temperature dependence of integrated PL intensity for the UV-LEDs grown on (a) sapphire and (b) FS-GaN substrates. Evidently, the temperature dependence of integrated PL intensity can be well fitted by Arrhenius formula [15]. By the fitting, the activation energy, Ea, was estimated to be 59 and 92 meV for UV-LEDs based on the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW structure grown on sapphire and FS-GaN substrates, respectively. Here, the Ea can be an indication of effective energy depth of QWs. Therefore, the activation energy of UV-LEDs on the FS-GaN substrate is 8.6% higher than that of the UV-LEDs on sapphire, leading to a minor overflow of carriers outside the InGaN MQW active region. That is to say, the carrier in UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate exhibited the larger carrier confinement effect and sharp interface between QWs and QB due to high-quality MQWs.To further understand the effect of substrate on the uniformity of InGaN/AlInGaN MQWs, the HRTEM analysis of the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW region was performed, as shown in Figure 5a. Besides, the EDS mapping was used to observe more clearly the indium (In) distribution in the InGaN/AlInGaN MQW region. Hence, both the EDS mapping images of regions I and II in Figure 5a were taken and presented in Figure 5b. As shown in Figure 5, the disorder is relatively evident for the UV-LEDs on sapphire substrates. Microstructures were formed with the spacing between them of about 1 to 2 nm or intimately connected to one another without any spacing between them for the UV-LEDs on the sapphire substrate. The non-uniform In distribution and phase separation in the MQW region also can be found in the same figure. However, when the UV-LEDs were grown on the FS-GaN substrate, the MQWs exhibited very uniform, and no microstructure and phase separation were found. It is notable that these two specimens were produced completely in the same run and therefore the growth conditions for these two specimens compared were completely the same except the substrates used. Consequently, it was very clear that the homo-epitaxial growth on FS-GaN should be the main cause for the uniform distribution of indium, no phase separation of InGaN well, and no microstructures.
Figure 4

Temperature dependence of PL intensity for UV-LEDs grown on (a) sapphire and (b) FS-GaN substrates.

Figure 5

HRTEM images (a) and EDS mapping images (b) of UV-LEDs grown on sapphire and FS-GaN substrates.

Figure 6a shows the typical power-current (L-I) characteristics for both samples. As we can see, the output power of the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate was enhanced by 78% at 20 mA compared with the UV-LEDs grown on the sapphire substrate. Finally, Figure 6b shows the EQE as a function of forward current for the UV-LEDs grown on FS-GaN and sapphire substrates. The EQE of these two types of UV-LEDs are under CW operations. Therefore, the efficiency droop, defined as (ηpeak - η100 mA)/ηpeak, was reduced from 20% in the UV-LEDs grown on the sapphire substrate to 3% in the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate. Clearly, the performance of UV-LEDs on FS-GaN can be expected due to ultra-low dislocation density and high thermal conductivity of FS-GaN. Comparing these measurements, the use of the FS-GaN substrate is not only to improve the crystal quality of UV-LED device but also to reduce the efficiency droop under high injection current.
Figure 6

Forward current and normalized external quantum efficiency. (a) Forward current as a function of light output for the UV- LEDs grown on sapphire and FS- GaN substrates. (b) Normalized external quantum efficiency as a function of forward current for LEDs on sapphire and FS-GaN under CW mode.

The results demonstrated in Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 can be understood as follows. In general, the quantum-dot-like structures in traditional InGaN/AlGaN MQWs could be responsible for the surprisingly high quantum efficiencies [1619]. Nevertheless, the non-uniform distribution of indium/aluminum and phase separation of InGaN/AlGaN will procure the formation of microstructures in MQWs [20], which induces the localization of carriers within the MQW stack, and therefore raise the IRN of MQWs [21]. However, the lowest STD exhibited by the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN might imply this sample to be with the lowest number of microstructures within its MQWs, and this is considered to be connected to a smallest IRN thus obtained. Additionally, the low threading dislocation density may be responsible for the high uniform electron and hole distribution in the MQW region of the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN. A direct consequence is the increase in the carrier distribution and radiative recombination rate in the MQW region and a rise in the light output power. Therefore, both features of uniform carrier distribution, weak QCSE, and small strain in the UV-LEDs on FS-GaN can be attributed to that a relatively good-quality epitaxial structure has been grown on the FS-GaN substrate due to homo-epitaxial growth.

Conclusions

We investigate the influence of the FS-GaN substrate on the performance of UV-LEDs grown atop by AP-MOCVD. The micro-Raman shift peak mapping image indicated that the strain-free GaN-based epilayer is grown on the FS-GaN substrate. Additionally, the effect of the FS-GaN substrate on the quality and In distribution of MQWs in UV-LEDs was examined in detail by HRTEM and EDS mapping. HRXRD analyses demonstrated high-order satellite peaks and clear fringes between them for the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate, from which the IRN was estimated to be 1.6%. From the temperature-dependent PL measurement, the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate have better carrier confinement than those grown on the sapphire substrate. Based on the results mentioned above, the light output power of the UV-LEDs on the FS-GaN substrate is higher than that of the UV-LEDs on the sapphire substrate by 78% at 20 mA. Besides, the efficiency droop was reduced from 20% in the UV-LEDs grown on the sapphire substrate to 3% in the UV-LEDs grown on the FS-GaN substrate. Conclusively, the use of the c-plane FS-GaN substrate suggests an effective technique to fabricate thereon high-power UV-LEDs.

Abbreviations

AFM: 

atomic force microscopy

AP-MOCVD: 

atmospheric pressure metal-organic chemical vapor deposition

EDS: 

energy-dispersive spectrometer

EQE: 

external quantum efficiency

FS-GaN: 

free-standing GaN

HRTEM: 

high-resolution transmission electron microscopy

HRXRD: 

high-resolution X-ray diffraction

HVPE: 

hydride vapor phase epitaxy

IQE: 

internal quantum efficiency

IRN: 

interface roughness

ITO: 

indium tin oxide

LEDs: 

light-emitting diodes

PL: 

photoluminescence

QCSE: 

quantum-confined Stark effect

TCL: 

transparent contact layer

UV: 

ultraviolet

VTP: 

vertical transparent package.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Advanced Optoelectronic Technology Corporation for the technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electrophysics, National Chiao Tung University
(2)
Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering, Department of Photonics, National Chiao Tung University
(3)
Advanced Optoelectronic Technology Inc.
(4)
Research Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica

References

  1. Tamulaitis G: Ultraviolet light emitting diodes. Lithuanian J Phys 2011, 51(3):177–193. 10.3952/lithjphys.51307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Khan A, Balakrishnan K, Katona T: Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes based on group three nitrides. Nat Photonics 2008, 2: 77–84. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sakuta H, Fukui T, Miyachi T, Kamon K, Hayashi H, Nakamura N, Uchida Y, Kurai S, Taguchi T: Near-ultraviolet LED of the external quantum efficiency over 45% and its application to high-color rendering phosphor conversion white LEDs. J Light & Vis Env 2008, 32(1):39–42. 10.2150/jlve.32.39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Baek SH, Kim JO, Kwon MK, Park IK, Na SI, Kim JY, Kim BJ, Park SJ: Enhanced carrier confinement in AlInGaN-InGaN quantum wells in near ultraviolet light-emitting diodes. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2006, 18: 1276.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wu JJ, Zhang GY, Liu XL, Zhu QS, Wang ZG, Jia QJ, Guo LP: Effect of an indium-doped barrier on enhanced near-ultraviolet emission from InGaN/AlGaN:In multiple quantum wells grown on Si(111). Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 015402. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/1/015402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Knauer A, Wenzel H, Kolbe T, Einfeldt S, Weyers M, Kneissl M, Tränkle G: Effect of the barrier composition on the polarization fields in near UV InGaN light emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 191912. 10.1063/1.2930686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schubert MF, Xu J, Kim JK, Schubert EF, Kim MH, Yoon S, Lee SM, Sone C, Sakong T, Park Y: Polarization-matched GaInN/AlGaInN multi-quantum-well light-emitting diodes with reduced efficiency droop. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 041102. 10.1063/1.2963029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tu PM, Chang CY, Huang SC, Chiu CH, Chang JR, Chang WT, Wuu DS, Zan HW, Lin CC, Kuo HC, Hsu CP: Investigation of efficiency droop for InGaN-based UV light-emitting diodes with InAlGaN barrier. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 211107. 10.1063/1.3591967View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chih-Chien P, Shuji N, DenBaars SP: High light extraction efficiency light-emitting diodes grown on bulk GaN and sapphire substrates using vertical transparent package. Conf Lasers Electro-Optics (CLEO) 2012, 6–11.Google Scholar
  10. Seitz R, Monteiro T, Pereira E, Di M: Strain relaxation in GaN films as a function of growth direction and buffer layer measured by Raman spectroscopy. Phys Stat Sol (a) 1999, 176(1):661–664. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199911)176:1<661::AID-PSSA661>3.0.CO;2-IView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Puech P, Demangeot F, Frandon J, Pinquier C, Kuball M, Domnich V, Gogotsi Y, GaN nanoindentation: A micro-Raman spectroscopy study of local strain fields. J Appl Phys 2004, 96(5):2853–2856. 10.1063/1.1775295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiu CH, Zhen-Yu L, Chao CL, Lo MH, Kuo HC, Yu PC, Lu TC, Wang SC, Lau KM, Cheng SJ: Efficiency enhancement of UV/blue light emitting diodes via nanoscaled epitaxial lateral overgrowth of GaN on a SiO2 nanorod-array patterned sapphire substrate. J Crystal Growth 2008, 310: 5170–5174. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.06.051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang JC, Jiang DS, Sun Q, Wang JF, Wang YT, Liu JP, Chen J, Jin RQ, Zhu JJ, Ying H: Influence of dislocations on photoluminescence of InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87(7):071908. 10.1063/1.2012531View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li ZY, Uen WY, Lo MH, Chiu CH, Lin PC, Hung CT, Lu TC, Kuo HC, Wang SC, Huang YC: Enhancing the emission efficiency of In0.2Ga0.8N/GaN MQW blue LED by using appropriately misoriented sapphire substrates. J Electrochemical Soc 2009, 156(2):H129-H133. 10.1149/1.3033401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yasan A, McClintock R, Mayes K, Kim DH, Kung P, Razeghi M: Photoluminescence study of AlGaN-based 280 nm ultraviolet light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 83(20):4083–4085. 10.1063/1.1626808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cao XA, Teetsov JA, Shahedipour-Sandvik F, Arthur SD: Microstructural origin of leakage current in GaN/InGaN light-emitting diodes. J Crystal Growth 2004, 264: 172–177. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.01.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chichibu S, Wada K, Nakamura S: Spatially resolved cathodoluminescence spectra of InGaN quantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 1997, 71: 2346. 10.1063/1.120025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Cho HK, Lee JY, Kim CS, Yang GM, Sharma N, Humphreys C: Microstructural characterization of InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells with high indium composition. J Crystal Growth 2001, 231: 466–473. 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01522-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeong MS, Kim JY, Kim YW, White JO, Suh EK, Hong CH, Lee HJ: Spatially resolved photoluminescence in InGaN/GaN quantum wells by near-field scanning optical microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 79: 976. 10.1063/1.1391227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tran CA, Karlicek RF Jr, Schurman M, Osinsky A, Merai V, Li Y, Eliashevich I, Brown MG, Nering J, Ferguson I, Stall R: Phase separation in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells and its relation to brightness of blue and green LEDs. J Crystal Growth 1998, 195: 397–400. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00572-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhen-Yu L, Ming-Hua L, Ching-Hua C, Po-Chun L, Tien-Chang L, Hao-Chung K, Shing-Chung W: Carrier localization degree of In0.2Ga0.8N/GaN multiple quantum wells grown on vicinal sapphire substrates. J Appl Phys 2009, 105: 013103. 10.1063/1.3055264View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tsai et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.