Open Access

High-purity Cu nanocrystal synthesis by a dynamic decomposition method

  • Xian Jian1, 2,
  • Yu Cao1,
  • Guozhang Chen1,
  • Chao Wang1Email author,
  • Hui Tang1, 2,
  • Liangjun Yin1,
  • Chunhong Luan1,
  • Yinglin Liang1,
  • Jing Jiang1,
  • Sixin Wu1,
  • Qing Zeng1,
  • Fei Wang1 and
  • Chengui Zhang1
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:689

Received: 23 September 2014

Accepted: 4 December 2014

Published: 20 December 2014


Cu nanocrystals are applied extensively in several fields, particularly in the microelectron, sensor, and catalysis. The catalytic behavior of Cu nanocrystals depends mainly on the structure and particle size. In this work, formation of high-purity Cu nanocrystals is studied using a common chemical vapor deposition precursor of cupric tartrate. This process is investigated through a combined experimental and computational approach. The decomposition kinetics is researched via differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis using Flynn-Wall-Ozawa, Kissinger, and Starink methods. The growth was found to be influenced by the factors of reaction temperature, protective gas, and time. And microstructural and thermal characterizations were performed by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. Decomposition of cupric tartrate at different temperatures was simulated by density functional theory calculations under the generalized gradient approximation. High crystalline Cu nanocrystals without floccules were obtained from thermal decomposition of cupric tartrate at 271°C for 8 h under Ar. This general approach paves a way to controllable synthesis of Cu nanocrystals with high purity.


Cupric tartrate Cu nanocrystals Precursor decomposition Chemical vapor decomposition


Metal nanocrystals with certain size and morphology have drawn great interests, not only due to their advanced chemical, electronic, optical, catalytic, and conductive properties but also on account of their wide applications in the fields of catalysts, sensors, optical devices, and so on [13]. With regard to the controllable synthesis of metal nanomaterial, most relevant studies have focused on Au and Ag nanocrystals because of their high conductivity and strong antioxidation properties [46]. However, potential large-scale use is limited greatly by the high cost of gold nanoparticles and the low resistivity toward ion migration of silver nanoparticles [7]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore an alternative that is inexpensive, highly purity, and environmental-friendly. Cu nanocrystal is a promising candidate in practical applications due to its excellent nonlinear optical properties, low bulk resistivity, good thermal stability, low-temperature coefficient of resistivity, etc. [811] The size and morphology of Cu nanocrystals can be controlled by lattice plane [12, 13]. There have been a number of methods proposed for preparing Cu nanocrystals, including physical vapor deposition [14], high-energy ball mill [15], γ radiation [16], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [17], chemical precipitation [18], micro-emulsion [19], sol–gel [20], hydrothermal [21], electrolytic [22], and liquid-phase reduction methods [23]. However, these methods have many inherent problems. For instance, iron impurities cannot be removed completely using high-energy ball mill [24]. It is difficult to control the size of particles by CVD due to the high growth temperature [25]. Therefore, it is desired to explore new approaches to achieve Cu nanocrystals with good qualities. Herein, we propose a controllable, highly efficient, low-cost, and environmental-friendly approach where highly pure Cu nanocrystals can be synthesized from the decomposition of cupric tartrate precursor.



Sodium potassium tartrate tetrahydrate (KNaC4H4O6•4H2O) and copper chloride were purchased from Tianjin Haijing Chemical Reagents Company, Tianjin, China, and Chengdu Jinshan Chemical Reagents Company Chengdu, China, respectively. High-purity gases including Ar and N2 were supplied by Chengdu Xuyuan Chemical Reagents Industry, Chengdu, China. All the reagents were analytical grade and used without further purification.

The preparation of cupric tartrate and Cu nanocrystals

First, copper chloride solution (100 ml, 0.01 M) was dripped into sodium potassium tartrate tetrahydrate solution (100 ml, 0.01 M) under constant magnetic stirring. Slowly, light blue cupric tartrate precipitates appeared. After magnetic stirring of 0.5 h, the blue precipitates were filtered and subsequently washed for three times with distilled water and ethanol. And then, the cupric tartrate was purified via Soxhlet extraction for 1.5 h and dried at 110°C for 4 h. After drying, the cupric tartrate powders were calcined at temperatures ranging from 200°C to 400°C, under the protecting gas of Ar or N2.


The thermal properties of cupric tartrate were investigated using a thermoanalyzers (TGA; STA 449C Jupiter, Selb, NETZSCH, Germany) under N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 5°C/min. The size and morphology of Cu nanocrystals were observed with a FEI QUANPA200 scanning electron microscope (SEM; QUANPA200, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and a Japanese Electronics H-700 transmission electron microscope (TEM; Hitachi, Ltd, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) with an operating voltage of 160 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Philips X’pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm).

Results and discussion

Cu nanocrystals were achieved by heating cupric tartrate under high-purity gas in the horizontal furnace. The decomposition process is evident from thermoanalysis, and the size and morphology of Cu nanocrystals can be controlled by adjusting reaction temperature and time.

Decomposition process

Figure 1 shows the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve for cupric tartrate. As seen from the figure, the DSC curve contains four endothermic peaks (261.0°C, 271°C, 282.1°C, and 306.3°C) and two exothermic peaks (245.6°C and 294.6°C). There is also a peak locating at 61.9°C, which is attributed to the dehydration of the crystal water. These results are slightly different from those reported by Qin et al. who reported an endothermic peak at 266.4°C and two exothermic peaks at 290.9°C and 309.3°C [26]. This may be due to the different heating rate used during the DSC experiments. Qin et al. used a heating rate of 10°C/min, which is higher than the one used here. It may cost a longer time to reach the equilibrium of reactions at a higher heating rate.
Figure 1

The DSC curve of the cupric tartrate at heating rate of 5°C/min under N 2 .

As illustrated in Figure 1, there are four endothermic peaks on the DSC curve of cupric tartrate. This indicates that the decomposition of cupric tartrate may be a complex process and proceed in several steps, which is in good agreement with the results of Schmid and Felsche [27] who used the same heating rate as our experiments. Schmid and Felsche found that decomposition of cupric tartrate produced numerous of species, including CH2, H2O, CO, C2H2, CH2O, O2, C2H2O, CO2, C2H2O2, C2H4O2, C2H2O3, C4H4O4, and C4H4O6. As for this experiment, the exothermic peaks at 245.6°C and 294.6°C are most likely due to the conversion of C4H4O62− into an isomeride with a hexatomic ring and the oxidation of Cu species, respectively [27]. The decomposition of tartrate diradical to C2H2O3 could be the origin of the endothermic peak at 261.0°C. Further decomposition of C2H2O3 to formaldehyde and CO2 may be responsible for the endothermic peak at 271°C. The endothermic peak at 282.1°C may be due to the decomposition of C4H4O62− to C4H4O4 and O2. The endothermic peak at 306.3°C may be resulted from the decomposition of C4H4O4 to CH2, H2O, CO, C2H2, and CH2O.

Figure 2 demonstrates the thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) curves at different heating rates (5°C, 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, 25°C/min). From these curves, the temperatures for the dehydration of crystal water mainly range from 97.8°C to 116.4°C, and the temperatures for the decomposition process locate between 247.2°C and 267.5°C. The kinetic properties of the decomposition process were analyzed by employing the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) method [28]:
Figure 2

TG/DTG curves of cupric (II) tartrate at different heating rates. (a) 5°C, (b) 10°C, (c) 15°C, (d) 20°C, and (e) 25°C/min.

1 g β = 1 g A E R G α 2.315 0.4567 E R T
where, β, R, T, A, E, and G(α) represent the different heating rates, the ideal gas constant, the thermodynamic temperature, the pre-exponential factor, the activation energy, and the mechanism kinetic equation with integral form, respectively. With different heating rates, the linear relationships can be performed by plotting the logarithm lgβ as a functional of the reciprocal of temperature, 1/T, with the decomposition rate α ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. The activation energy can be calculated from the slope of the linear relationships. We divided the overall decomposition process into two stages, including dehydration (stage I) and decomposition (stage II). The matching lines during stage I have good coefficients of association close to 1, with a standard error of 0.0111 on average (Figure 3a and Table 1). This indicates that stage I can be described by one kinetic equation. On the other hand, stage II cannot be described by one kinetic equation, as the slopes obtained from the linear regression change (Figure 3b and Table 2). This may be due to that generations of tartrate diradical and fragments of C2H2O2, C2H4O2, C2H2O3, C4H4O4, and C4H4O6 break the linear relationships.
Figure 3

lg β -1,000 T −1 relationship of cupric tartrate at decomposition stages: (a) I and (b) II.

Table 1

Related dynamic parameters of cupric (II) tartrate at decomposition stage I using FWO method



Decomposition rate α










E a (kJ/mol)










Coefficients of association r










Standard deviation










Table 2

Related dynamic parameters of cupric (II) tartrate at decomposition stage II using FWO method



Decomposition rate α










E a (kJ/mol)










Coefficients of association r










Standard deviation










Further analysis of the most probable kinetic equation is performed by the Malek method [29]. The standard curve (1) and the experimental curve (2) are shown as follow:
y α = f α G α f 0.5 G 0.5
y α = T T 0.5 2 d α d t d α d t 0.5 .
As shown in Figure 4a, there is a good fitness between the standard curve and the experimental curve for the dehydration stage. This indicates that the kinetic equation of the dehydration stage is G(α) = 1 − (1 − α)1/3 with integral form and f(α) = 3(1 − α)2/3 with differential form, respectively. On the other hand, the experimental curve for the decomposition stage keeps to the accelerated curve and does not fit with the standard curve completely under heating rate of 5°C/min (Figure 4b). The kinetic equation for the decomposition stage may be G(α) = lnα2. Under heating rates of 10°C to 25°C/min (Figure 4c), the experimental curves of the decomposition stage are the decelerated curves and fit well with the standard curve, and the kinetic equation of the decomposition stage should be G(α) = (1 − α)−1.
Figure 4

Experimental result and y ( α ) −α standard curves of cupric (II) tartrate. Decomposition stage I (a) 5°C ~ 25°C/min and stage II (b) 5°C/min and (c) 10°C ~ 25°C/min.

The activation energies of the dehydration stage calculated from the FWO, Kissinger [30], and Starink [31] methods are 94.24, 93.07, and 92.79 kJ/mol, respectively, while those for the decomposition stage are 177.33, 177.88, and 177.65 kJ/mol, respectively. The as-calculated results have the approximate value using the three kinds of methods. Thus, the above thermogravimetry analysis by FWO method is reasonable. The kinetic parameters for the decomposition process of cupric tartrate are summarized in Table 3. Based on the above analyses, we would suggest the following possible mechanism:
Table 3

Related dynamic parameters of cupric (II) tartrate using FWO method




E a (kJ/mol)



Decomposition stage I



1 − (1 − α)1/3

Decomposition stage II


20.68, (α < 0.5)

lnα2, (α < 0.5)


20.63, (α > 0.5)

(1 − α)−1, (α > 0.5)

C u C 4 H 4 O 6 3 H 2 O 25 ° C 100 ° C C u C 4 H 4 O 6 s + 3 H 2 O g
C u C 4 H 4 O 6 s 227 ° C 313 ° C C u s + C 4 H 4 O 6 g + fragments g

These results are in good agreement with the results of the decomposition of cupric tartrate and the formation of tartrate fragmentations reported by Schmid and Qin [26, 27].

Effect of decomposition temperatures

As reflected by the SEM images shown in Figure 5, the Cu nanocrystals obtained from the decomposition of copper tartrate exhibit rather distinguished shapes in the range from 200°C to 400°C. As described in Figure 5a, microparticles are the main decomposition products at 200°C. As the temperature increases to 250°C, the size of the Cu nanocrystals increases remarkably and some floccules can be found among Cu nanocrystals (Figure 5b). Decomposition at 350°C results in a decrease of the floccules, implying a higher purity of the Cu nanocrystals. The Cu nanocrystals become larger with the temperature increases to 350°C and 400°C, as shown in Figure 5c, d. These results indicate that lower decomposition temperatures favor producing Cu nanocrystals with smaller sizes but lower purity. Higher temperatures are favorable for forming Cu nanocrystals with higher purities, but aggregations of the nanocrystals can easily occur.
Figure 5

SEM images of product after the decomposition of the cupric tartrate at different temperatures. (a) 200°C, (b) 250°C, (c) 350°C, and (d) 400°C.

The XRD patterns of the decomposition products at different temperatures are plotted in Figure 6. On the XRD pattern, many characteristic diffraction peaks of cupric tartrate between 13° and 55° are clearly observed, in good agreement with the standard cupric tartrate diffraction pattern (ICDD, PDF file No. 03-065-9743). After heating at 200°C, the diffraction peaks of the floccules and Cu(111) appear on the XRD pattern. As the temperature increases to 250°C, five peaks at 29.6°, 36.5°, 42.4°, 61.4°, and 73.7° are present and are attributed to Cu2O(110), Cu2O(111), Cu2O(220), Cu(111), and Cu(220), respectively. This suggests that the floccules disappear at 250°C. On the XRD pattern of the sample obtained from the decomposition processes at 350°C and 400°C, the peaks assigned to Cu2O(110), Cu2O(111), and Cu2O(220) disappear. It should be noted that there are three peaks 43.3°, 50.5°, and 74.1°, which are due to the Cu metal, on the XRD pattern of the sample formed from decomposition at 400°C. It may caused by the reduction of Cu2O by CO and C2H2 generated from the decomposition of cupric tartrate.
Figure 6

XRD patterns of products after the decompositions of the cupric (II) tartrate at different temperatures.

Effect of reaction time

In this section, we will discuss the effect of the reaction time on the properties of the Cu nanocrystals by fixing the decomposition temperature at 271°C. As shown in Figure 6, the sample produced from the decomposition at 271°C has a higher purity. At the same time, the decomposition temperature, i.e., 271°C, is lower than the temperatures which can induce serious aggregations. From the XRD patterns shown in Figure 6, the sample obtained from the decomposition at 271°C for 8 h is much higher than that obtained decomposition at 271°C for 0.5 h. With quantitative analysis of the sample after decomposition for 0.5 h by HighScore® software, the moral ratio of pure Cu nanocrystals is 93%, while that of Cu2O is 7%. When the decomposition time was elongated to 8 h, Cu2O disappears, as reflected by the XRD patterns plotted in Figure 6. Figure 7a, b, c, d shows the TEM images of the samples from the decomposition at 271°C for 0.5 and 8 h. Lattice fringe with d = 2.1 Å confirms the formation of pure Cu nanocrystals. The floccule stuff is also observed in the products as shown in Figure 7a, which is in agreement with the results of SEM characterization.
Figure 7

TEM images of copper particles obtained from the decomposition of cupric tartrate at 271°C under Ar. (a, b) 0.5 h and (c, d) 8 h.

First-principles study of the decomposition of cupric tartrate

In order to reveal the impetus of copper formation, it is necessary to investigate reaction mechanism of cupric tartrate, in particular to the decomposition kinetics, which is directly related to the formation of copper nanocrystals. However, the decomposition process of metallorganics can hardly be measured. We studied the molecular dynamic of cupric tartrate (CuC4H4O6) by density functional theory (DFT) calculations [32] with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of PBE [33], as implemented in the Dmol3 package [34]. The basis sets used in this work were double-numerical quality basis sets with polarization functions (DNP), which is comparable to the Gaussian 6–31 G** basis set in size and quality [35]. The global orbital cutoff scheme was used, and a 4.4 Å was assigned as global orbital cutoff. We optimized all possible isomers and calculated the binding energies. For nonperiodic systems of copper tartrate, only the NVE and NVT ensembles are available. In order to reasonably study the decomposition kinetics, NVT ensembles were used to control the reaction temperature, which fits well with the related experiments. To the energy-favored stable structure of cupric tartrate, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations were performed using the NVT ensemble (i.e., constant number of atoms, constant volume, and constant energy) which allows both the temperature and stress of the system to change during the decomposition. The molecular dynamic simulation was performed at the initial temperature range of 273 ~ 673 K using NVT ensemble, with a time step of 0.1 fs and simulation time of 0.2 ps. The two Cu-O bonds both increase with the temperature increasing from 273 ~ 673 K as shown in Figure 8. Compared with the original Cu-O bond length of 1.868 and 1.848 Å, the elongated bond length has the maximum value of 2.035 and 2.239 Å at 623 K, respectively, which demonstrates the formation of Cu atom. Besides, the length of a C-C bond elongates from 1.727 to 4.107 Å as the temperature increases up to 673 K. And then, molecular of cupric tartrate decomposes into a Cu atom, HCOOH, and C3O4H2 fragment. It can be speculated that Cu atoms generate from the cupric tartrate prior to the full decomposition of fragments which is in agreement with the fact that Cu nanocrystal and fragments coexist at relatively low temperatures.
Figure 8

The images of optimization conformation of cupric tartrate (CuC 4 H 4 O 6 ). After molecular dynamic course at the initial temperature from 273 ~ 673 K. (a) 273 K, (b) 373 K, (c) 473 K, (d) 573 K, (e) 623 K, and (f) 673 K.


In the present work, high-purity Cu nanocrystals were successfully synthesized from the decomposition of cupric tartrate at 271°C for 8 h under the atmosphere of Ar. The size and purity of the Cu nanocrystals depend on the decomposition temperature and time. Higher temperatures are favorable for the production of highly pure Cu nanocrystals but induce serious aggregations. Longer decomposition time leads to high-purity Cu nanocrystals of larger size. Kinetic analysis results indicated that the conversion of cupric tartrate to Cu nanocrystals is a two-step process, including dehydration and decomposition steps. It is expected that the efficient but simple decomposition method proposed in the present work will help to open a new way to prepare highly pure Cu nanocrystals with desired sizes and morphologies.




This work was financially supported by the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices (KFJJ201411), the Scientific Research Expenses Foundation (for new teachers) of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (No. Y02002012001007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51302029, 51402040, 51402045 and 51202228), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. A03010023801115). We would like to express our appreciation for the helpful comments of Dr. Yunxiang Pan at Nanyang Technological University.

Authors’ Affiliations

Clean Energy Materials and Engineering Center, School of Energy Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, Center for Information in BioMedicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China


  1. Jian X, Zhou Z, Wu S, Chen L, Zeng Q, Wang C: Controllable preparation of Ni nanoparticles for catalysis of coiled carbon fibers growth. Nanoscale Res Lett 2014, 9: 1–7. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tao AR, Habas S, Yang P: Shape control of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Small 2008, 4: 310–325. 10.1002/smll.200701295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hernandez-Eguia L, Ferre-Borrull J, Macias G, Pallares J, Marsal L: Engineering optical properties of gold-coated nanoporous anodic alumina for biosensing. Nanoscale Res Lett 2014, 9: 414. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Perelaer J, de Gans BJ, Schubert US: Ink-jet printing and microwave sintering of conductive silver tracks. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 2101–2104. 10.1002/adma.200502422View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang Y, Zhu P, Li G, Zhao T, Fu X, Sun R, Zhou F, Wong C-p: Facile preparation of monodisperse, impurity-free, and antioxidation copper nanoparticles on a large scale for application in conductive ink. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 6: 560–567.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou N, Li D, Yang D: Morphology and composition controlled synthesis of flower-like silver nanostructures. Nanoscale Res Lett 2014, 9: 302. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-302View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Skrabalak SE, Au L, Li X, Xia Y: Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes and Au nanocages. Nat Protocols 2007, 2: 2182–2190. 10.1038/nprot.2007.326View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhong J, Xiang W, Zhao H, Zhao W, Chen G, Liang X: Synthesis, characterization, and third-order nonlinear optical properties of copper quantum dots embedded in sodium borosilicate glass. J Alloy Compd 2012, 537: 269–274.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hans M, Erbe A, Mathews S, Chen Y, Solioz M, Mücklich F: Role of copper oxides in contact killing of bacteria. Langmuir 2013, 29: 16160–16166. 10.1021/la404091zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang Z, von dem Bussche A, Kabadi PK, Kane AB, Hurt RH: Biological and environmental transformations of copper-based nanomaterials. ACS Nano 2013, 7: 8715–8727. 10.1021/nn403080yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kung H, Teplyakov AV: Formation of copper nanoparticles on ZnO powder by a surface-limited reaction. J Phys Chem C 2013, 118: 1990–1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wagner JB, Gwathmey AT: The formation of powder and its dependence on crystal face during the catalytic reaction of hydrogen and oxygen on a single crystal of copper. J Am Chem Soc 1954, 76: 390–391. 10.1021/ja01631a021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Venkatasubramanian R, He J, Johnson MW, Stern I, Kim DH, Pesika NS: Additive-mediated electrochemical synthesis of platelike copper crystals for methanol electrooxidation. Langmuir 2013, 29: 13135–13139. 10.1021/la4027078View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Saremi M, Yeganeh M: Improved corrosion resistance of nanostructured copper deposited by Eb-Pvd in acidic media. Int J Mod Phys Conf Ser 2012, 5: 687–695.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sheibani S, Ataie A, Heshmati-Manesh S, Khayati GR: Structural evolution in nano-crystalline Cu synthesized by high energy ball milling. Mater Lett 2007, 61: 3204–3207. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.11.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu Y, Qian Y, Zhang M, Chen Z, Lu B, Zhou G: γRRadiation-hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline copper powders. Mater Sci Eng B 1994, 23: 116–119. 10.1016/0921-5107(94)90343-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgkinson JL, Massey D, Sheel DW: The deposition of copper-based thin films via atmospheric pressure plasma-enhanced CVD. Surf Coat Technol 2013, 230: 260–265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jian-Guang Y, Yuang-Lin Z, Okamoto T, Ichino R, Okido M: A new method for preparing hydrophobic nano-copper powders. J Mater Sci 2007, 42: 7638–7642. 10.1007/s10853-007-1899-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohde H, Hunt F, Wai CM: Synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles in a water-in-supercritical-carbon dioxide microemulsion. Chem Mater 2001, 13: 4130–4135. 10.1021/cm010030gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo N, Li X-J, Liu K-X, Ye L-M, Chen T-W: Preparation of carbon-coated copper nanoparticles by detonation decomposition of copper ion doped sol–gel explosive precursors. J Nanoparticle Res 2013, 15: 1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Z, Yang Y, Liang J, Hu Z, Li S, Peng S, Qian Y: Synthesis of copper nanowires via a complex-surfactant-assisted hydrothermal reduction process. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 12658–12661. 10.1021/jp036023sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Luan Q, Bley V, Lebey T, Schlegel B, Menager L: Nano copper wires interconnection for three-dimensional integration in power electronics. In Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008 PESC 2008 IEEE. Rhodes: IEEE; 2008:278–281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Q-L, Yang Z-M, Ding B-J, Lan X-Z, Guo Y-J: Preparation of copper nanoparticles by chemical reduction method using potassium borohydride. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 2010, 20: s240-s244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Balema VP, Wiench JW, Dennis KW, Pruski M, Pecharsky VK: Titanium catalyzed solid-state transformations in LiAlH4 during high-energy ball-milling. J Alloy Compd 2001, 329: 108–114. 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01570-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakaso K, Okuyama K, Shimada M, Pratsinis SE: Effect of reaction temperature on CVD-made TiO2 primary particle diameter. Chem Eng Sci 2003, 58: 3327–3335. 10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00213-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Qin Y, Zhang Q, Cui Z: Effect of synthesis method of nanocopper catalysts on the morphologies of carbon nanofibers prepared by catalytic decomposition of acetylene. J Catal 2004, 223: 389–394. 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmid R, Felsche J: Thermal decomposition of Cu (II) (C4H4O6)·3H2O and Co(II) (C4H4O6)·2.5 H2O. Determination of mechanism by means of simultaneous thermal analysis and mass spectrometry. Thermochim Acta 1982, 59: 105–114. 10.1016/0040-6031(82)87097-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Starink M: A new method for the derivation of activation energies from experiments performed at constant heating rate. Thermochim Acta 1996, 288: 97–104. 10.1016/S0040-6031(96)03053-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Málek J, Mitsuhashi T, Criado JM: Kinetic analysis of solid-state processes. J Mater Res 2001, 16: 1862–1871. 10.1557/JMR.2001.0255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Boswell P: On the calculation of activation energies using a modified Kissinger method. J Therm Anal Calorim 1980, 18: 353–358. 10.1007/BF02055820View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Flynn JH, Wall LA: A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J Polymer Sci B Polymer Lett 1966, 4: 323–328. 10.1002/pol.1966.110040504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hohenberg P, Kohn W: Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 1964, 136: B864-B871. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Perdew J, Wang Y: Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys Rev B 1992, 45: 13244–13249. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Delley B: From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J Chem Phys 2000, 113: 7756–7764. 10.1063/1.1316015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tian D, Ren S, Hao C: Dynamic motion of La atom inside the C74 ( D3h) cage: a relativistic DFT study. J Mol Model 2013, 19: 1591–1596. 10.1007/s00894-012-1703-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Jian et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.