Skip to main content

Advertisement

Ag nanoparticle-deposited TiO2 nanotube arrays for electrodes of Dye-sensitized solar cells

Article metrics

  • 2186 Accesses

  • 24 Citations

Abstract

Dye-sensitized solar cells composed of a photoanode of Ag nanoparticle (NP)-deposited TiO2 nanotube (TNT) arrays were fabricated. The TNT arrays were prepared by anodizing Ti films on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass substrates. Efficient charge transportation through the ordered nanostructure of TNT arrays should be carried out compared to conventional particulate TiO2 electrodes. However, it has been a big challenge to grow TNT arrays on FTO glass substrates with the lengths needed for sufficient light-harvesting (tens of micrometers). In this work, we deposited Ag nanoparticles (NPs) on the wall of TNT arrays to enhance light-harvesting property. Dye-sensitized solar cells with these Ag NP-deposited TNT arrays yielded a higher power conversion efficiency (2.03 %) than those without Ag NPs (1.39 %).

PACS codes

06.60.Ei Sample preparation, 81.05.Bx Metals, Semimetals, Alloys, 81.07.De Nanotubes

Background

Photovoltaics is now taking part in the global movement from fossil fuels to renewable sources. Dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) has been recognized as a probable competitor to the widely used but relatively expensive solar cells including silicon and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) due to its lower cost, lower sensitivity to light angle of incidence, and easy fabrication on flexible substrates [1, 2]. The power conversion efficiency of DSSC has now reached around 13 % [3], which is still less than half of the high-efficiency solar cells mentioned above. DSSCs are generally composed of a photoanode consisting of anatase nano-particulate film with thicknesses of >10 μm on a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) glass substrate supporting a monolayer of a dye, a platinum foil or a platinum-coated TCO glass counter-electrode, and an iodide electrolyte between them. The electrons generated in the dye by light irradiation are injected into the anatase nano-particulate film, and then diffuse through the nanoparticle network in the film before reaching to the TCO substrate. The electrons undergo millions of recombination events at defect sites and interfaces between nanoparticles during percolating through the TiO2 nano-particulate film. Therefore, an increase in the TiO2 film thickness significantly increases electrical resistivity of DSSCs, though thick TiO2 films are generally employed to increase the amount of dyes and to enhance light-harvesting ability.

In order to achieve high-energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with thinner TiO2 film thickness, the invention of new dyes that strongly absorb sun light, which contains both short- and long-wavelength photons, should be carried out [4]. Alternatively, vertically aligned TiO2 architectures such as nanorod and nanotube arrays that offer longer electron diffusion lengths (decreased charge recombination rate) and shorter electron transport time should be fabricated. Among various architectures, the most promising one for solar energy conversion appears to be TiO2 nanotube (TNT) arrays prepared through anodization of titanium [510]. Remarkably enhanced charge collection efficiency and light scattering in DSSCs fabricated with TNT arrays grown on a Ti foil were reported previously by comparing to DSSCs with conventional TiO2 nano-particulate films [6]. The electron diffusion length in TNT arrays was found to be three times longer than nano-particulate films [11]. However, the highest power conversion efficiency of DSSCs with TNT arrays reported so far is only 6.9 %, which is about half of the efficiency of DSSCs with conventional TiO2 nano-particulate films [12]. The authors of the paper concluded that the major issue that limited the conversion efficiency in DSSCs with TNT arrays was the low fill factor, which was obtained by the degradation of the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates. This degradation of FTO occurred during long-term heat treatment at high temperature which was necessary to improve crystallinity of TNT arrays with the length of 17.6 μm, which is about five times longer than TNT arrays commonly fabricated by anodization by Ti.

In this work, Ag nanoparticles were deposited on the wall of the TNT arrays on FTO substrates. Ag nanoparticles exhibit localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) that strongly absorbs and scatters photons compared to dyes and TiO2. The enhanced electric field by LSPR of Ag nanoparticles efficiently excites electrons in neighboring dyes. The photon scattering phenomenon by LSPR works as mirror-like scattering layers, which are often formed to enhance light-harvesting ability of DSSCs [13]. As a result, the optimum length of TNT arrays should be shortened, requiring a shorter heating time at a lower temperature. DSSCs with TNT arrays on FTO were fabricated, and the effects of Ag nanoparticle deposition onto the TNT arrays on the performance of DSSCs were investigated.

Methods

TiO2 nanotube arrays on FTO

Radio frequency magnetron sputtering of Ti was carried out at 50 W cm−2 of power density and 5 mTorr in an Ar gas atmosphere for 5 h to form Ti films with a thickness of 3 μm on FTO glass substrates (10 Ω □−1, 85 % transmittance). The Ti deposition rate was estimated to be 8.4 nm min−1. The substrates were then dipped into electrolytes of ethylene glycol (EG) with NH4F and H2O, where the weight ratio of EG:NH4F:H2O was 0.3:2:97.7. The electrolyte was prepared and used without any conditioning process. Applied voltages of 10–40 V were used for anodizing the Ti film on FTO; anodization duration was also varied from 30 to 60 min to control the tubular pore structures. The samples were washed with 2-propanol and then washed with H2O. After drying in air at room temperature, heat treatment at 450 °C with a ramp rate of 3 °C min−1 was carried out for 4 h to crystallize TNT arrays without collapsing the tubular structures. The arrays were soaked into 0.3 mM N719 dye (Aldrich) of acetonitrile and butanol-mixed solution for 16 h. Excessively adsorbed dyes were rinsed out by washing with methanol. Ag nanoparticle deposition was done by dipping the arrays into 0.1 M AgNO3 aqueous solution, followed by radiating ultra-violet (UV, 365 nm) at 1 mW cm−2 for 3 min.

Structural analyses

A Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to study the morphology of TNT arrays. A Rigaku Ultima IV R285S X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used to examine TiO2 crystallinity and Ag deposition. A JEOL JEM-2100 F transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with a JEOL 2300 T energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDX) was used to study the dispersion state of Ag nanoparticles in the TNT arrays. An FEI Quanta focused-ion beam system (FIB) was used to prepare monolith samples with a size of 10 × 4 μm and a thickness of 100 nm for the cross-sectional TEM-EDX analysis. A JASCO V-670 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer was used to investigate the effect of Ag nanoparticle deposition on optical absorbance of the photoanode.

DSSC fabrication and evaluation

The prepared TNT arrays on FTO were used as photoanode. The counter electrodes were prepared by sputtering Pt of a few nanometer thick on indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrates. The electrolyte for DSSCs was synthesized using acetonitrile mixed with 0.05 M iodine, 0.1 M lithium iodide, 0.6 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, and 0.5 M 4-tert-buthylpyridine. After preparing each component as above, spacer films (DU PONT, Himilan) of a thickness of 50 μm, leaving a window of an area of 1 cm2, were sandwiched in two electrodes and heated at 220 °C for 15 min. The electrolyte solution was finally injected into the space between two electrodes. The final architecture is illustrated in Fig. 1. The current-voltage characteristics of the DSSC were investigated using a SMU source/measure unit (Asahi spectra) equipped with a HAL-C100 solar simulator (Asahi spectra) composed of a 300-W xenon lamp and an air-mass 1.5 global filter.

Fig. 1
figure1

Illustration of fabricated DSSC

Results and discussion

Morphology of TiO2 nanotube arrays

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of TNT arrays prepared by anodizing Ti films on FTO at 40 V for 40 min. Generally, debris is formed on the top of TNT arrays after anodization, and they partially close the tubular pore ends. TNT arrays with partially closed ends are less appropriate for DSSC applications, because electrolyte dissolution is limited during generation of electricity. On the other hand, the arrays prepared in this work were obviously debris free. This is presumably because of the low Ti dissolution rate, which depends on the concentration of oxidants (NH4F and H2O in this work) in electrolytes for anodization [14, 15]. The length of the tubes was measured to be ~3.9 μm and the diameter of the pores was ~51 nm. The Ti film was not fully anodized, resulting in formation of Ti interlayer of ~200 nm between TNT arrays and FTO. The Ti interlayer worked to have good physical and electronic contacts between TNT arrays and FTO.

Fig. 2
figure2

SEM image of as-anodized TNT arrays

The tube length and pore diameter of TNT arrays were able to control by altering applied voltage and anodization time as shown in Fig. 3. Both the tube length and the pore diameter were increased with increasing applied voltage. Conversely, the pore diameter was not increased when anodization time increased, whereas the tube length was well dependent on the time. Since longer nanotube arrays with smaller pore diameters should possess larger roughness factor, which is the ratio of the real surface area and the flat surface area, they are appropriate for DSSC applications. However, since debris and clump appeared when the tube length was too long and pore diameter was too small. Therefore, TNT arrays with ~3.9 μm tube length and ~51 nm pore diameter were employed for DSSC fabriaction in this work.

Fig. 3
figure3

Variation of tube lengths and pore sizes of TNT arrays as functions of applied voltage (a) and anodizing time (b)

Dispersion of Ag nanoparticles on the wall of nanotube arrays

Figure 4a shows the XRD patterns of TNT arrays on FTO before and after heat treatment and subsequent Ag nanoparticle deposition. Peaks from FTO were only observed in the pattern of as-anodized TNT arrays. On the other hand, the heat-treated sample showed anatase peaks as well as FTO peaks in the XRD pattern. This indicated that amorphous TiO2 crystallized to become anatase TiO2 through annealing at 450 °C. It was also confirmed that the sheet resistance of FTO was not deteriorated by the heating process. A small peak of Ag appeared at ~44° after Ag nanoparticle deposition process. The dispersion state of deposited Ag was studied using TEM-EDX analyses. The cross-sectional TEM image of Ag nanoparticle-deposited TNT arrays (Fig. 4b) revealed that Ag was deposited as oval nanoparticles with minor axes of 10–50 nm, which were smaller than the pore diameter of TNTs (~50 nm). This means that the nanoparticles were deposited at the inside of the tubular pores of arrays. The TEM-EDX results (Fig. 4c) showed that Ag nanoparticles were preferentially deposited onto the upper part of the arrays, so the bottom part of them was almost empty. This state of Ag distribution was formed presumably because the TNTs were not fully filled with AgNO3 solution when Ag was deposited by UV radiation. However, the dispersion state of Ag in this sample is probably suitable to enhance DSSC performance because of the following two reasons: (i) if the arrays were fully covered with Ag, dye molecules could not be adsorbed on TiO2; (ii) surface plasmon resonance of Ag nanoparticles shows not only absorption but also scattering of light, thus the bottom part of TNT arrays should not be coated with Ag. Otherwise, certain amount of incident light is scattered by LSPR of Ag nanoparticles and not goes into DSSCs.

Fig. 4
figure4

XRD patterns of TNT arrays before and after heat treatment and subsequent Ag nanoparticle deposition (a). Cross-sectional TEM (b) and EDX mappings associated with the corresponding TEM image (c) of Ag nanoparticle deposited-TNT arrays

Figure 5 shows the UV-visible (Vis) spectra of TNT arrays on FTO substrates before and after Ag nanoparticle deposition and dye loading. TNT arrays showed strong absorption in the UV region due to interband transition of anatase. In addition to this absorption, TNT arrays with Ag nanoparticles showed a broad peak centered at 490 nm, which is attributed to LSPR of Ag nanoparticles. TNT arrays adsorbed with dye showed another absorption peak at 520 nm, which is defined as absorption of the dye molecules. TNT arrays with both Ag nanoparticles and dye (TNT-Ag-dye) showed a broad and strong peak centered at 500 nm, which is presumably integrated absorption of Ag nanoparticles and dye. This result indicates that Ag nanoparticle deposition clearly enhances the photon harvesting ability of TNT arrays adsorbed with dye.

Fig. 5
figure5

UV-Vis spectra of TNT arrays before and after Ag nanoparticle deposition and dye loading

DSSC performance

Figure 6a shows the current-voltage characteristics of DSSC fabricated with annealed TNT arrays on FTO. The power conversion efficiency of the DSSC was 1.39 % (open-circuit voltage VOC = 0.73 V, short-circuit density JSC = 4.2 mA cm−2, fill factor FF = 0.44). On the other hand, the DSSC fabricated from Ag nanoparticle-deposited TNT arrays yielded a conversion efficiency of 2.03 % (VOC = 0.76 V, JSC = 5.0 mA cm−2, FF = 0.54) (Fig. 6b). The improvement of JSC caused by depositing Ag nanoparticles should mainly be due to enhanced light-harvesting ability. LSPR of Ag nanoparticles strongly absorb and scatter photons compared to almost all materials including dyes, thus more photons are captured by the DSSC with Ag nanoparticles [16]. Additionally, since the electric field near Ag nanoparticles becomes very strong when LSPR is induced, the electrons of dyes are effectively excited by the enhanced local field. Therefore, the improved JSC is reasonably explained in terms of the abovementioned LSPR effects, because more excited electrons are generated by depositing Ag nanoparticles on the arrays. The deposition of Ag nanoparticles on TNTs should also have negative effects on DSSC performance, for example, the excited electrons are captured by Ag nanoparticles leading to deteriorated electron conductivity of the TNTs. However, the negative effects were hidden by the positive effect of improved light-harvesting ability. On the other hand, the reason why FF was improved by Ag deposition is still unclear. Presumably, the deposition of Ag nanoparticles occurred predominantly at the defect sites because of the higher surface energy of the sites. Thus, Ag nanoparticles got rid of the defect sites where charge recombination often occurs. Considering that as-purchased N719 was used without further purification process in this work, higher conversion efficiency should be obtainable by using properly purified or recently developed dyes [17]. A surface treatment of TiO2 electrode by TiCl4, which is often employed to improve JSC and FF [18, 19], was also not carried out in this work. Moreover, optimization of the length of TNT arrays should also be effective for enhancement of our DSSC performance.

Fig. 6
figure6

Current-voltage and power-voltage characteristics of DSSC fabricated using TNT arrays without (a) and with (b) Ag nanoparticles. The blue line (power, P) was given by P = I × V

Conclusions

The morphology of TNT arrays on FTO substrates was controlled by altering applied voltage and anodizing duration. Debris-free TNT arrays with a length of 3.9 μm and a pore diameter of 51 nm were successfully prepared and used for subsequent Ag nanoparticle deposition and DSSC fabrication. The deposited Ag was mainly distributed at the upper part of TNT arrays (until ~1 μm from the top), so the bottom part was almost in the absence of Ag. Evaluated DSSC performance unveiled that Ag nanoparticle deposition was effective to increase JSC and FF, while VOC was unaffected. Although the reason why FF was improved was still unclear, the increased JSC was well explained in terms of enhanced light-harvesting ability by LSPR of Ag nanoparticles. Since TiCl4 treatment, dye purification, and optimization of Ag loading quantity and TNT length were not carried out in this work, much higher conversion efficiency can be expected in the future.

Abbreviations

NPs:

Nanoparticles

FTO:

Fluorine-doped tin oxide

DSSC:

Dye-sensitized solar cell

CIGS:

Copper indium gallium diselenide

TCO:

Transparent conducting oxide

LSPR:

Localized surface plasmon resonance

EG:

Ethylene glycol

UV:

Ultra-violet

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

XRD:

X-ray diffractometer

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

EDX:

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope

FIB:

Focused-ion beam

References

  1. 1.

    Gratzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature. 2001;414:338–44.

  2. 2.

    Gong J, Liang J, Sumathy K. Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): fundamental concepts and novel materials. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2012;16:5848–60.

  3. 3.

    Mathew S, Yella A, Gao P, Humphry-Basile R, Curchod BFE, Ashari-Astani N, et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells with 13% efficiency achieved through the molecular engineering of porphyrin sensitizers. Nature Chem. 2014;6:242–7.

  4. 4.

    Nazeeruddin MK, Angelis FD, Fantacci S, Selloni A, Viscardi G, Liska P, et al. Combined experimental and DFT-TDDFT computational study of photoelectrochemical cell ruthenium sensitizers. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16835–47.

  5. 5.

    Mor GK, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Shankar K, Grimes CAA. Review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: fabrication, material properties and solar energy applications. Sol Energ Mater Sol Cell. 2006;14:2011–75.

  6. 6.

    Zhu K, Neale NR, Miedaner A, Frank AJ. Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays. Nano Lett. 2007;7:69–74.

  7. 7.

    Kuang D, Brillet J, Chen P, Takata M, Uchida S, Miura H, et al. Application of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano. 2008;2:1113–6.

  8. 8.

    Gao XF, Li HB, Sun WT, Chen Q, Tang FQ, Peng LM. CdTe quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrodes. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:7531–5.

  9. 9.

    Chen C, Ali G, Yoo SH, Kum JM, Cho SO. Improved conversion efficiency of CdS quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 nanotube-arrays using CuInS2 as a co-sensitizer and an energy barrier layer. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:16430–5.

  10. 10.

    Chen C, Li F, Li G, Tan F, Li S, Ling L. Double-sided transparent electrodes of TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly efficient CdS quantum dot-sensitized photoelectrodes. J Mater Sci. 2014;49:1868–74.

  11. 11.

    Jennings JR, Ghicov A, Peter LM, Schmuki P, Walker AB. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: transport, trapping and transfer of electrons. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13364–72.

  12. 12.

    Varghese OK, Paulose M, Grimes CA. Long vertically aligned titania nanotubes on transparent conducting oxide for highly efficient solar cells. Nature Nanotech. 2009;4:592–7.

  13. 13.

    Yu H, Bai Y, Zong X, Tang F, Lu GQM, Wang L. Cubic CeO2 nanoparticles as mirror-like scattering layers for efficient light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Commun. 2012;48:7386–8.

  14. 14.

    Paulose M, Shankar K, Yoriya S, Prakasam HE, Varghese OK, Mor GK, et al. Anodic growth of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays to 134 μm in length. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:16179–84.

  15. 15.

    Zhu K, Vinzant TB, Neale NR, Frank AJ. Removing structural disorder from oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: reducing the dimensionality of transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 2007;7:3739–46.

  16. 16.

    Eustis S, El-Sayed MA. Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: Nobel metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the radiative and nonradiative properties of nano crystals of different shapes. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:209–17.

  17. 17.

    Nazeeruddin MK, Kay A, Rodicio I, Humphry-Baker R, Mueller E, Liska P, et al. Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-decarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl, Br, I, CN, and SCN) on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:6382–90.

  18. 18.

    Sommeling PM, O’Regan BC, Haswell RR, Smit HJP, Bakker NJ, Smits JJT, et al. Influence of a TiCl4 post-treatment on nanocrystalline TiO2 films in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:19191–7.

  19. 19.

    Lee CH, Chiu WH, Lee KM, Hsieh WF, Wu JM. Improved performance of flexible dye-sensitized solar cells by introducing an interfacial layer on Ti substrates. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:5114–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants from Tatematsu Foundation and Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering.

Author information

Correspondence to Go Kawamura.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

GK and AM designed the study. GK and HO performed the experiments with help from AM. GK and AM contributed in drafting the manuscript. All the authors provided technical and scientific insight and contributed to the editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawamura, G., Ohmi, H., Tan, W.K. et al. Ag nanoparticle-deposited TiO2 nanotube arrays for electrodes of Dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 10, 219 (2015) doi:10.1186/s11671-015-0924-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anodization
  • TiO2 nanotube arrays
  • Ag nanoparticles
  • Light harvesting
  • Dye-sensitized solar cells