Skip to main content

SERS Detection of Dopamine Using Label-Free Acridine Red as Molecular Probe in Reduced Graphene Oxide/Silver Nanotriangle Sol Substrate


The reduced graphene oxide/silver nanotriangle (rGO/AgNT) composite sol was prepared by the reduction of silver ions with sodium borohydride in the presence of H2O2 and sodium citrate. In the nanosol substrate, the molecular probe of acridine red (AR) exhibited a weak surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) peak at 1506 cm−1 due to its interaction with the rGO of rGO/AgNT. Upon addition of dopamine (DA), the competitive adsorption between DA and AR with the rGO took place, and the AR molecules were adsorbed on the AgNT aggregates with a strong SERS peak at 1506 cm−1 that caused the SERS peak increase. The increased SERS intensity is linear to the DA concentration in the range of 2.5–500 μmol/L. This new analytical system was investigated by SERS, fluorescence, absorption, transmission electron microscope (TEM), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) techniques, and a SERS quantitative analysis method for DA was established, using AR as a label-free molecular probe.


Noble metal nanoparticles have been widely employed in various fields such as catalysis, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, biomarkers, and thermal therapy due to their unique physical and chemical properties [14]. Especially nanogold and nanosilver have been of particular interest in spectroscopic analyses because of their intense visible-region absorption, which is largely attributed to the surface plasmon resonance. Compared to nanogold, nanosilver has the advantages of a low-cost, higher molar extinction coefficient [5] and stronger surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effects [6]. Moreover, nanosilver has a very broad range of antimicrobial activity [7] and represents a new generation of antimicrobials. The properties of metal nanoparticles depend strongly on the nanoparticles’ size and shape [8, 9]. Several methods have been developed for synthesizing nanosilver in a variety of shapes, including triangle, cube, rod, and wire [1014]. But, most of the methods need high-concentration surfactants as stabilizer that restrains SERS effect and pollutes the environment. Thus, it is significant to explore a simple, stable, environmentally friendly, and highly SERS-active AgNT sol preparation, combined with new nanomaterials.

Graphene, with an atomically thin structure that consists of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms, has become a research hot spot in the field of physics and materials since it exhibits remarkable electronic, mechanical, and thermal properties [15]. However, the high specific surface area of graphene sheets makes them tend to form irreversible aggregation by van der Waals interaction, which restricts the large-scale application of graphene sheets [16]. Graphene oxide (GO) is a chemically treated graphene and has most recently emerged as a potential alternative to graphene. It is generally suggested that GO possesses various oxygenated functionalities such as hydroxyl and epoxy on the basal plane and carboxyl group at the edges [17]. The unique properties of GO such as superior molecule adsorbability, water solubility, fluorescence quenching ability, and Raman-scattering features make it suitable for biological applications [1820]. Recently, the graphene-enhanced Raman scattering was discovered by Zhang’s group, and graphene has been shown to be an effective Raman-enhancement substrate [21, 22]. By combining the metal nanoparticle with graphene or graphene derivatives, a graphene-based composite has been fabricated for SERS analysis and better Raman-enhanced signals of the adsorbate were obtained [2325]. Yang et al. [26] had researched the fabrication of water-dispersible Ag-GO composites by using tryptophan as a reducing and stabilizing agent and indicated that silver nanoparticles with spherical size were well dispersed on the surface of graphene oxide, and crystal violet exhibited excellent SERS activity in the synthesized Ag-GO nanocomposite substrates. Murphy et al. [27] had designed a reduced graphene-oxide-Ag nanoparticle composite to boost SERS sensitivity of a porphyrin derivative of TMPyP. Huang et al. [28] had described the preparation of Au nanoparticle-graphene-oxide composite; the developed approach offers well-controlled size, size distribution, and morphology of the metal nanoparticles in the metal-GO nanohybrids. They also demonstrated that the Au-GO composites are superior SERS substrates to the gold nanoparticles and exhibit significantly higher catalytic activities than the corresponding gold nanoparticles. Nowadays, the four main labeled technologies including radioactive-, enzyme-, fluorescence-, and nanoparticle-labeled technologies were applied widely to biochemistry analysis because of the advantages of high sensitivity and selectivity. High sensitivity and selectivity immunolabeling SERS and aptamer-labeling SERS technologies had developed based on the labeled technology combining with the immune and aptamer reactions [2931]. As far as we know, the fingerprint of Raman spectroscopy could provide abundant information on molecular structure. Label-free SERS technique utilizing adequately the molecular fingerprint specificity can detect samples simply, rapidly, and nondestructively. Meanwhile, Raman spectroscopy has strong anti-photobleaching and is without water interference, and by the enhancement effect of metal nanoparticle substrate, label-free SERS techniques show considerable potential application in a biomacromolecule [3235].

Dopamine (DA) is a catecholamine neurotransmitter associated with proper functioning of the central nervous system and is also an important marker for clinical disease; dopamine levels are connected to various pathologic states such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease [3638]. Therefore, the detection of dopamine is significant for medical or physiological research. At present, several methods including chemiluminescence [39], fluorescence spectrometry [40], high-performance liquid chromatography [41], colorimetry [42], electrochemistry [43, 44], and SERS [4547] have been proposed for dopamine. SERS has been applied in fields of science and technology, such as surface adsorption, biochemical sensors, and biomedical analysis [4850]. Oh et al. used an optofluidic SERS for label-free detection of dopamine molecules [45]. Bu et al. reported that AuNPs were used as substrate; a concentration of 1×10−7 to 1×10−5 mol/L DA can be detected by SERS technique [46]. To date, there are no reports about the label-free acridine red (AR) SERS for detection of dopamine in a reduced graphene oxide/silver nanotriangle (rGO/AgNT) sol substrate. In this paper, a new, simple, and rapid SERS spectral method has been proposed for detection of trace dopamine.



A 1.0×10−4 mol/L acridine red solution, 1.0 mol/L NaCl, 0.01 mol/L AgNO3, 0.06 mol/L trisodium citrate, 30 % H2O2, 0.1 mol/L NaBH4, pH 6.0 Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer solution, 0.1 % GO, and 1.0×10−2 dopamine hydrochloride were prepared. A 43.1 μg/mL silver nanotriangle (AgNT) was prepared as follows [51, 52]: in a triangle flask containing about 40.0 mL water, 2 mL 0.01 mol/L AgNO3, 3 mL 0.06 mol/L sodium citrate, 600 μL 30 % H2O2, and 600 μL 0.1 mol/L NaBH4 were added in turn with constant stirring for 15 min and diluted to 50 mL to obtain the AgNT sol; this mixture was then heated at 40 °C for 30 min to get rid of the excess H2O2 and NaBH4. The preparation of 43.1 μg/mL rGO/AgNT was the same as that of AgNT, except 5 mL of 0.1 % GO was injected into solution after the addition of NaBH4. All reagents were of analytical grade, and the water was highly pure sub-boiling water.

Apparatus and Measurements

A model of DXR smart Raman spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used with a laser wavelength of 633 nm and a power of 2.5 mW. A model of the F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Co., Chiyoda-ku, Japan), a model of the TU-1901 double beam UV–vis spectrophotometer (Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), a model of FEI Quanta 200 FEG scanning electron microscope (FEI Co., Ltd., Eindhoven, Holland), and a model of SK8200LH ultrasonic reactor (Shanghai Kudos Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were used.

Procedure for SERS Detection of DA

A 400 μL 100 μg/mL rGO/AgNT, 35 μL 1.0×10−4 mol/L acridine red, and 10 μL 0.05 mol/L pH 6.0 Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer solution and a certain amount of DA were added into a 5-mL calibrated tube, diluted to 1 mL and mixed well. Then, 80 μL 1.0 mol/L NaCl was added and diluted to 2 mL. The SERS intensity at 1506 cm−1 (I) was recorded by a Raman spectrometer. A blank reagent (I)0 without DA was recorded, and the value of Δ I = I − (I)0 was calculated.

Results and Discussion


Several groups have contributed to the knowledge that acridine orange (AO) can be bound on rGO to form an AO-rGO complex through electrostatic and π-π stacking interactions, resulting in the effective fluorescence quenching of AO [53, 54]. The structure of the AR molecule is shown in Fig. 1. AR is also a cationic dye with three aromatic rings and two amino groups in its chemical structure, and AO has a similar structure. The GO has some oxygen-containing functional groups, such as epoxy, hydroxyl, and carboxylic groups, which make GO in aqueous dispersion negatively charged, so cationic AR molecules can absorb on the GO surface through electrostatic interactions. Besides, the huge aromatic surface of GO can attract AR through π-π stacking. In the presence of a pH 6.0 PBS buffer solution containing 0.04 mol/L NaCl, when AR molecules were added into a rGO/AgNT solution, AR could absorb on the rGO surface by π-π stacking and electrostatic interactions, but absorption on the AgNT aggregate surface was so poor showing a weak SERS signal. As shown in Fig. 1, the DA molecule has an aromatic ring, two hydroxyl groups, and an amino group in its chemical structure. Upon addition of DA, it could also adsorb on the rGO sheets due to π-π stacking, and dopamine further interacts with the hydroxyl groups of rGO sheets due to multiple hydrogen bonding. Thus, DA molecules have a much stronger affinity to the rGO surface in comparison with AR molecules which was similar to the system of DA-Rh6G-GO [55]. When the concentration of rGO/AgNT held constant, the number of binding sites on the rGO surface was constant, AR and DA molecules competed for similar adsorption sites on the rGO surface. The adsorption of DA molecules can lead to desorption of AR molecules from the rGO surface; the desorbed AR molecules adsorbed on the AgNT aggregates and showed a strong SERS signal. When the concentration of DA increased, the desorbed AR molecules increased, and the AR molecules adsorbed on the AgNT aggregates surface increased gradually. The increased SERS intensity responds linearly with the concentration of DA. Accordingly to these, a SERS spectral method with label-free AR can be developed for the determination of trace DA in solution.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Principle of SERS detection of DA

SERS Spectra

In the substrate of rGO/AgNT sol, AR exhibited SERS peaks at 608, 771, 1308, 1358, 1506, and 1646 cm−1, respectively. These peaks were ascribed to the outside surface deformation of CH, ring breathing, bending vibration of aromatic CH, stretching vibration aromatic CH, bending vibration of NH, and bending vibration of aromatic C=C, respectively. When AR was mixed with rGO/AgNT, AR adsorbed on the rGO surface due to electrostatic and π-π stacking interactions; only a small amount of AR molecules were absorbed on the AgNT aggregate surface, and the SERS signal was weak. Upon addition of DA, there were strong interactions between DA and rGO that resulted in the AR desorption from the rGO; the desorbed AR molecules adsorbed on the AgNT aggregates and showed strong SERS effect. The SERS intensity of AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system at 1506 cm−1 increased linearly as the concentration of DA increased (Fig. 2(a–h)). When 500 μmol/L DA was added, the SERS intensity of the system reached a maximum that was identical to the SERS intensity of AR on the AgNT aggregates without rGO (Fig. 2(i)). Based on the competitive adsorption between DA and AR, the original SERS intensity of AR was recovered, which corresponded with the principle.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SERS spectra of the AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system. (a) 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT-1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-0.04 mol/L NaCl; (b) (a)-10 μmol/L DA; (c) (a)-75 μmol/L DA; (d) (a)-100 μmol/L DA; (e) (a)-175 μmol/L DA; (f) (a)-250 μmol/L DA; (g) (a)-375 μmol/L DA; (h) (a)-500 μmol/L DA; (i) 8.62 μg/mL AgNT-1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-0.04mol/L NaCl

Fluorescence Spectra

In the presence of the pH 6.0 PBS buffer solution, the characteristic emission peak of AR is located at 552 nm when excitation wavelength is 520 nm (Fig. 3(a)). When AR was mixed with AgNT aggregates, fluorescence intensity of AR remained strong (Fig. 3(b)). When AR was mixed with GO, AR was adsorbed on the GO surface by π-π stacking and hydrophobic interactions; fluorescence quenching of AR took place because of the photoinduced electron transfer or long-range resonance energy transfer between AR and GO; the strong fluorescence of AR was almost entirely quenched by the GO (Fig. 3(c)). After DA addition, the strong binding of DA with GO resulted in a release of AR from GO, so the fluorescence intensity was enhanced (Fig. 3(d)). Upon addition of AR to the rGO/AgNT solution, the fluorescence intensity was weak due to the adsorption of AR molecules on the rGO surface and the fluorescence quenching of AR. The added DA molecules led to the AR desorption from the rGO because the intermolecular interactions of DA and rGO were stronger than those in the case of AR and rGO; finally, the fluorescence intensity at 520 nm increased as the concentration of DA increased (Fig. 3(e–j)), which was in agreement with the principle.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Fluorescence spectra of the AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system. (a) 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS; (b) 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-8.62 μg/mL AgNT-0.04 mol/L NaCl; (c) 20 μg/mL GO -1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS; (d) 20 μg/mL GO -1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS -175 μmol/L DA; (e) 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT-1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-0.04 mol/L NaCl; (f) (a)-50 μmol/L DA; (g) (a)-100 μmol/L DA; (h) (a)-175 μmol/L DA; (i) (a)-250 μmol/L DA; (j) (a)-500 μmol/L DA

Absorption Spectra

There is an absorption peak at 528 nm for AR. The absorption peak at 280 nm was related to the benzene rings of DA, and the intensity was increased with increasing DA concentration (Fig. 4). In the rGO/AgNT-DA system, absorption peak of DA was still at 280 nm, there was a new absorption peak at 400 nm, and the intensity was increased with the increasing DA concentration that indicated the formation of a rGO/AgNT-DA conjugate (Fig. 5) and suggested that DA had stronger affinity to rGO. In the AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system, as the DA concentration increased, the rGO/AgNT-DA conjugates increased gradually, more and more AR molecules desorbed from rGO, the absorption peak at 280 nm was also increased, and absorption peak at 400 nm was increased with the increasing rGO/AgNT-DA conjugate (Fig. 6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Absorption spectra of the AR-DA system. (a)1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS; (b) (a)-25 μmol/L DA; (c) (a)-50 μmol/L DA; (d) (a)-100 μmol/L DA; (e) (a)-175 μmol/L DA; (f) (a)-250 μmol/L DA; (g) (a)-375 μmol/L DA; (h) (a)-500 μmol/L DA

Fig 5
figure 5

Absorption spectra of the rGO/AgNT-DA system. (a) 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT - pH 6.0 PBS-0.04 mol/L NaCl; (b) (a)-100 μmol/L DA; (c) (a)-250 μmol/L DA; (d) (a)-500 μmol/L DA

Fig. 6
figure 6

Absorption spectra of the AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system. (a) 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT -1.75×10−6 mol/L AR- pH 6.0 PBS-0.04 mol/L NaCl; (b) (a)-100 μmol/L DA; (c) (a)-250 μmol/L DA; (d) (a)-500 μmol/L DA

Transmission Electron Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope

Silver nanotriangles were prepared by reducing AgNO3 with NaBH4 in the presence of H2O2 and sodium citrate. Figure 7a showed that most of the particles were silver nanotriangles with the side length between 10 and 70 nm. The rGO/AgNT composites were prepared by addition of GO; as showed in Fig. 7b, rGO with wrinkles were observed, and silver nanotriangles were adsorbed on the rGO surface.

Fig. 7
figure 7

TEM of AgNT and SEM of rGO/AgNT. a TEM image of the 43.1 μg/mL AgNT; b SEM image of the 43.1 μg/mL rGO/AgNT

SERS Quantitative Analysis of DA

The effect of pH for the PBS buffer solution was studied (Fig. 8). The ΔI value reached its maximum when the pH was 6.0. Thus, a pH 6.0 PBS buffer solution was selected for use. The effect of AR concentration on the determination was studied (Fig. 9). When the concentration of rGO held constant, as the concentration of AR increased, ΔI was increased as well. The concentration of AR was more than 1.75×10−6 mol/L; the SERS signal of the system without DA increased due to excess AR absorbed on the AgNT aggregates that resulted in the decrease of ΔI. Thus, a 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR was chosen for the assay. NaCl was a good aggregation reagent for AgNT. The effect of NaCl concentration on the determination was studied (Fig. 10). As the concentration of NaCl increased, ΔI was enhanced as well. When the concentration of NaCl was 0.04 mol/L, the ΔI value reached the maximum. When the concentration of NaCl increased further, the ΔI value decreased because the AgNT aggregated excessively and precipitated. Thus, a 0.04 mol/L NaCl was chosen for the assay. The influence of the rGO/AgNT concentration on the determination was studied (Fig. 11). When the concentration of rGO/AgNT was 8.62 μg/mL, the ΔI value was maximal. Thus, a 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT was chosen for the assay.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of pH. 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-PBS-2.5×10−5 mol/L DA-0.05 mol/L NaCl-5.39 μg/mL rGO/AgNT

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of AR concentration. pH 6.0 PBS-2.5×10−5 mol/L DA-0.05 mol/L NaCl-5.39 μg/mL rGO/AgNT

Fig. 10
figure 10

Effect of NaCl concentration. 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-2.5×10−5 mol/L DA -5.39 μg/mL rGO/AgNT

Fig. 11
figure 11

Effect of rGO/AgNT concentration. 1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-2.5×10−5 mol/L DA-0.04 mol/L NaCl

For a quantitative method, a linear relationship exists in a fit range that is a linear range. For this SERS quantitative analysis method, the SERS intensity at 1506 cm−1 (I) increased with the DA increase. In the absence of DA, the blank value (I)0 is about 388. When DA concentrations are lower than 2.5 μmol/L, the I values are very close to the blank due to the unclear adsorption difference for the low-concentration DA. When the DA concentration is higher than 500 μmol/L, the I values hold constant due to the DA-saturated adsorption on the rGO/AgNT. When DA concentration (C) is in the range of 2.5–500 μmol/L, the increased SERS intensity ΔI at 1506 cm−1 increased linearly, with a regress equation of ΔI = 1.80C + 48, R 2 of 0.9905, and a detection limit of 1.2 μmol/L (Fig. 12). Each measurement for data points was determined five times; for the relative standard deviations of determination, different DA concentrations were in the range of 2.1–5.1 %; this showed the method is accurate. The analytical system also can be determined by DA absorption and fluorescence spectral techniques (Table 1), and the SERS method is most sensitive with the biggest slope. Thus, the SERS method was chosen for detection of DA. The influence of coexistence substances on the determination was examined within an error of ±10 %. Results (Table 2) indicated that common substances do not interfere with the determination of 100 μmol/L DA, and this method has good selectivity. The DA in dopamine hydrochloride injection samples with a reference concentration of 5.29×10−2 mol/L dopamine hydrochloride was determined by this SERS method. A 5-μL dopamine hydrochloride injection sample that was diluted five times was used for the determination of DA content, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3.9–5.3 %. A recovery of 98.3–103 % was obtained when a known DA was added to the samples (Table 3).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Working curve of the AR-rGO/AgNT-DA system. 8.62 μg/mL rGO/AgNT-1.75×10−6 mol/L AR-pH 6.0 PBS-0.04 mol/L NaCl-DA

Table 1 Analytical features of the three spectral methods
Table 2 Effect of coexistence substances
Table 3 Results for the detection of dopamine hydrochloride in samples


The rGO/AgNT composite sol was prepared for SERS substrate. When AR and DA were added into the rGO/AgNT sol, competitive adsorption occurred between DA and AR around the rGO surface; DA has stronger affinity to rGO than that of AR that resulted in desorption of AR molecules from the rGO surface and adsorption on the AgNT aggregate surface that exhibited strong SERS effects. The intensity of SERS peak at 1506 cm−1 increased as the concentration of DA increased. A new SERS method was developed for the determination of DA over 2.5–500 μmol/L based on the label-free probe.


  1. Pasi P, Weckhuysen BM, Sankar M. Progress in controlling the size, composition and nanostructure of supported gold-palladium nanoparticles for catalytic applications. Catal Sci Technol. 2013;3:2869–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou HB, Yang DT, Ivleva NP, Mircescu NE, Niessner R, Haisch C. SERS detection of bacteria in water by in situ coating with Ag nanoparticales. Anal Chem. 2014;86:1525–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel MC, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev. 2004;104:293–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Austin LA, Mackey MA, Dreaden EC, El-Sayed MA. The optical, photothermal, and facile surface chemical properties of gold and silver nanoparticles in biodiagnostics, therapy, and drug delivery. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88:1391–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei H, Chen CG, Han BY, Wang EK. Enzyme colorimetric assay using unmodified silver nanoparticles. Anal Chem. 2008;80:7051–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang LB, Liu HL, Ma YM, Liu JH. Solvent-induced hot spot switch on silver nanorod enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analyst. 2012;137:1547–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA. Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev. 2005;4:1025–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ray PC. Size and shape dependent second order nonlinear optical properties of nanomaterials and their application in biological and chemical sensing. Chem Rev. 2010;9:5332–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Y, Matsubara S, Xiong LM, Hayakawa T, Nogami M. Solvothermal synthesis of multiple shapes of silver nanoparticles and their SERS properties. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:9095–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cathcart N, Kitaev V. Monodisperse hexagonal silver nanoprisms: synthesis via thiolate-protected cluster precursors and chiral, ligand-imprinted self-assembly. ACS Nano. 2011;9:7411–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zou XQ, Dong SJ. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering studies on aggregated silver nanoplates in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:21545–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abell JL, Driskell JD, Zhao YP. Controllable and reversible hot spot formation on silver nanorod arrays. Chem Commun. 2014;50:106–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang C, Brodoceanu D, Kraus T, Voelcker NH. Templated silver nanocube arrays for single-molecule SERS detection. RSC Adv. 2013;3:4288–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng XH, Tang H, Jiang JH. Recent progress in graphene-material-based optical sensors. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:6903–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park S, Ruoff RS. Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4:217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim F, Cote LJ, Huang JX. Graphene oxide: surface activity and two-dimensional assembly. Adv Mater. 2010;22:1954–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qian ZS, Shan XY, Chai LJ, Ma JJ, Chen JR, Feng H. A universal fluorescence sensing strategy based on biocompatible graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide for the detection of DNA. Nanoscale. 2014;6:5671–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu YF, Luo M, Xiang X, Chen CH, Ji XH, Chen L, et al. A graphene oxide and exonuclease-aided amplification immuno-sensor for antigen detection. Chem Commun. 2014;50:2679–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu ZB, Liu BW, Ding JS, Liu JW. Fluorescent sensors using DNA-functionalized graphene oxide. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:6885–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ling X, Xie L, Fang Y, Xu H, Zhang H, Kong J, et al. Can graphene be used as a substrate for Raman enhancement? Nano Lett. 2010;10:553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ling X, Moura LG, Pimenta MA, Zhang J. Charge-transfer mechanism in graphene-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem C. 2012;47:251112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu WG, Ling X, Xiao JQ, Dresselhaus MS, Kong J, Xu HX, et al. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy on a flat graphene surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:9281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu C, Wang X. Fabrication of flexible metal-nanoparticle films using graphene oxide sheets as substrates. Small. 2009;5:2212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu YM, Hu Y, Zhang J. Few-layer graphene-encapsulated metal nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:8993–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang BW, Liu ZM, Guo ZY, Zhang W, Wan MM, Qin XC, et al. In situ green synthesis of silver-graphene oxide nanocomposites by using tryptophan as a reducing and stabilizing agent and their application in SERS. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;316:22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy S, Huang LB, Kamat PV. Reduced graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle composite as an active SERS material. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:4740–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang J, Zhang LM, Chen B, Ji N, Chen FH, Zhang Y, et al. Nanocomposites of size-controlled gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide: formation and applications in SERS and catalysis. Nanoscale. 2010;2:2733–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ge M, Cui Y, Gu RA. Progress in labeled immunoassay based on SERS. Spectrosc Spect Anal. 2008;28:110–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guo HY, Lu LH, Wu C, Pan JG, Hu JW. SERS tagged gold nanorod probes for immunoassay application. Acta Chim Sinica. 2009;67:1603–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Song CY, Yang YJ, Wang LH. SERS-based nucleic acid detection. Prog Chem. 2014;26:1516–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shao F, Chen K, Luo ZH, Wang YJ, Lu DL, Han HY. Application of SERS techniques in diagnosis and bioassay. Prog Chem. 2012;24:2391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lo HC, Hsiung HI, Chattopadhyay S, Han HC, Chen CF, Leu JP, et al. Label free sub-picomole level DNA detection with Ag nanoparticles decorated Au nanotip arrays as surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy platform. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:2413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Barhoumi A, Halas NJ. Label-free detection of DNA hybridization using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:12792–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Driskell JD, Tripp RA. Label-free SERS detection of microRNA based on affinity for an unmodified silver nanorod array substrate. Chem Commun. 2010;98:3298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heien ML, Khan AS, Ariansen JL, Cheer JF, Phillips PEM, Wassum KM, et al. Real-time measurement of dopamine fluctuations after cocaine in the brain of behaving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10023–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Venton BJ, Wightman RM. Psychoanalytical electrochemistry: dopamine and behavior. Anal Chem. 2003;75:414A–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim JH, Auerbach JM, Gómez JAR, Velasco I, Gavin D, Lumelsky N, et al. Dopamine neurons derived from embryonic stem cells function in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Nature. 2002;418:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Amjadi M, Manzoori JL, Hallaj T, Sorouraddin MH. Strong enhancement of the chemiluminescence of the cerium (IV)-thiosulfate reaction by carbon dots, and its application to the sensitive determination of dopamine. Microchim Acta. 2014;181:671–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mu Q, Xu H, Li Y, Ma SJ, Zhong XH. Adenosine capped QDs based fluorescent sensor for detection of dopamine with high selectivity and sensitivity. Analyst. 2014;139:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferry B, Gifu EP, Sandu I, Denoroy L, Parrot S. Analysis of microdialysate monoamines, including noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin, using capillary ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr B. 2014;951–952:52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Feng JJ, Guo H, Li YF, Wang YH, Chen WY, Wang AJ. Single molecular functionalized gold nanoparticles for hydrogen bonding recognition and colorimetric detection of dopamine with high sensitivity and selectivity. ACS App Mater Inter. 2013;5:1226–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang L, Liu D, Huang JS, You TY. Simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid at electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified electrode. Sensor Actuat B-Chem. 2014;193:166–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fabregat G, Estrany F, Casas MT, Alemán C, Armelin E. Detection of dopamine using chemically synthesized multilayered hollow microspheres. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:4702–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oh YJ, Jeong KH. Optofluidic SERS chip with plasmonic nanoprobes self-aligned along microfluidic channels. Lab Chip. 2014;14:865–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bu Y, Lee S. Influence of dopamine concentration and surface coverage of Au shell on the optical properties of Au, Ag, and AgcoreAushell nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4:3923–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ranc V, Markova Z, Hajduch M, Prucek R, Kvitek L, Kaslik J, et al. Magnetically assisted surface-enhanced Raman scattering selective determination of dopamine in an artificial cerebrospinal fluid and a mouse striatum using Fe3O4/Ag nanocomposite. Anal Chem. 2014;86:2939–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hsu KC, Chen DH. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of Ag/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate with high uniformity. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang YK, He CE, He WJ, Yu LJ, Peng RG, Xie XL, et al. Reduction of silver nanoparticles onto graphene oxide nanosheets with N, N-dimethylformamide and SERS activities of GO/Ag composites. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13:5571–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dutta S, Ray C, Sarkar S, Pradhan M, Negishi Y, Pal T. Silver nanoparticle decorated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheet: a platform for SERS based low-level detection of uranyl ion. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2013;5:8724–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mtraux GS, Mirkin CA. Rapid thermal synthesis of silver nanoprisms with chemically tailorable thickness. Adv Mater. 2005;17:412–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu QY, Wen GQ, Zhang XH, Liang AH, Jiang ZL. Utilization of triangle nanosilver to prepare spherical nanosilver and quantitatively detect trace titanium by SERS. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shi Y, Huang WT, Luo HQ, Li NB. A label-free DNA reduced graphene oxide-based fluorescent sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of hemin. Chem Commun. 2011;47:4676–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu L, Liu WT, Hong TT, Weng XC, Zhai QQ, Zhou X. Ag+ and cysteine detection by Ag+-guanine interaction based on graphene oxide and G-quadruplex DNA. Anal Methods. 2012;4:1935–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ren H, Kulkarni DD, Kodiyath R, Xu WN, Choi I, Tsukruk VV. Competitive adsorption of dopamine and rhodamine 6G on the surface of graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2014;6:2459–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21267004, 21367005, 21365011, 21467001, 21465006, 21477025), the Scientific Research and Technological Development Program of Guangxi (No. GKH14251003) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (No. 2013GXNSFFA019003, 2013GXNSFAA019046, 2014GXNSFAA118050, 2014GXNSFAA118059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aihui Liang or Zhiliang Jiang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LM and YHL contributed equally to this work. LM and YHL drafted the manuscript. LM, YHL, and XHZ carried out the studies. AHL and ZLJ conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped draft and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Yanghe Luo and Lu Ma contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Ma, L., Zhang, X. et al. SERS Detection of Dopamine Using Label-Free Acridine Red as Molecular Probe in Reduced Graphene Oxide/Silver Nanotriangle Sol Substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 10, 230 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • rGO/AgNT
  • Dopamine
  • Acridine red
  • Label-free
  • SERS