Table 2 Summary of membrane characteristics from previous studies
Nanoparticle type | Method | Modified membrane properties | Salt rejection | Flux (L/m2 h) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MgTiO3 nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Enhanced surface hydrophilicity, increase roughness | 98 | 45 | [46] |
MgTiO3 in TMC/hexane | |||||
Zeolite nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Smoother, hydrophilic, and negatively charged surfaces | 93 | 40.2 | [47] |
NaA in TMC/hexane | |||||
Silica nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Silica particle interacting well with the polyamide | 91 | 27.2 | [48] |
Silica in MPD/water | |||||
Silica nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Tunable pore radius and higher thermal stability | 71.7 | 40.8 | [49] |
Silica in MPD/water | |||||
Silver nanoparticles | IP (MPD/BTC) | Higher anti-biofouling effect | 97 | 94 | [50] |
Silver in BTC | |||||
TiO2 nanoparticles | The neat TFC membrane was dipped in the transparent TiO2 colloidal solution | Higher photocatalytic bactericidal efficiency under UV light | 96.6 | 24.5 | [51] |
TiO2 nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Enhanced surface hydrophilicity | 95 | 9.1 | [52] |
TiO2 in TMC and HCFC | |||||
Zeolite nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Increase roughness and contact angle | 90.5 | 43.7 | [53] |
NaY in TMC/hexane | |||||
Al2O3 nanoparticles | IP (MPD/TMC) | Enhanced surface hydrophilicity | 88 | 5 | [54] |
Al2O3 in TMC/hexane |