Open Access

The Effects of Grain Boundaries on the Current Transport Properties in YBCO-Coated Conductors

  • Chao Yang1,
  • Yudong Xia1,
  • Yan Xue1,
  • Fei Zhang1,
  • Bowan Tao1 and
  • Jie Xiong1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201510:416

Received: 23 September 2015

Accepted: 16 October 2015

Published: 26 October 2015


We report a detailed study of the grain orientations and grain boundary (GB) networks in Y2O3 films grown on Ni-5 at.%W substrates. Electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) exhibited different GB misorientation angle distributions, strongly decided by Y2O3 films with different textures. The subsequent yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) barrier and CeO2 cap layer were deposited on Y2O3 layers by radio frequency sputtering, and YBa2Cu3O7-δ (YBCO) films were deposited by pulsed laser deposition. For explicating the effects of the grain boundaries on the current carry capacity of YBCO films, a percolation model was proposed to calculate the critical current density (J c) which depended on different GB misorientation angle distributions. The significantly higher J c for the sample with sharper texture is believed to be attributed to improved GB misorientation angle distributions.


YBa2Cu3O7-δ (YBCO) Grain boundary (GB) Current carry capacity Misorientation angles


In the past decades, YBa2Cu3O7-δ (YBCO) thin films deposited on single crystal achieved a high critical current density (J c) in the range of 1~10 MA/cm2 at 77 K, self field [1]. Tremendous efforts have been devoted to fabricate high performance YBCO thin films on flexible metal tapes as promising high temperature superconductor (HTS) wires for power application or high field magnets [2, 3]. However, YBCO deposited on polycrystalline substrates exhibited high angle grain boundaries (GBs) between the grains, which acted as Josephson coupled weak-links behavior, drastically reducing the current carry capacity, i.e., J c smaller than 1 MA/cm2 [4, 5]. Dimos et al. [6] reported the dependence of J c on the misorientation angles. For GBs with low angles (θ < 5°), the critical current densities decreased slightly when the bicrystal misorientation angles θ increased, and the behavior was similar to that exhibited in single grains. However, with increasing misorientation angle θ in bicrystals at a range of 15°~20°, J c decreased very rapidly. Horide et al. [7] reported that the current transport conformed with Josephson junction behavior for a large angle θ. For depositing well-aligned coated conductors, two techniques were successfully explored to prepare the biaxial texture. The first was ion beam-assisted deposition (IBAD) to deposit single-crystal-like films on polycrystalline metal substrates [8, 9]. Whereas the second, named rolling-assisted biaxially textured substrate (RABiTS), was used for thermomechanical processing to achieve biaxially texture Ni-alloy tapes directly [10, 11].

In RABiTS technology, rolling and annealing of the substrate result in the formation of a sharp {100} <100> cube texture. The typical textures of the tapes are 5°~7° decided by X-ray ω-scan (out-of-plane) and Φ-scan (in-plane) full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) values. Unfortunately, inherent grain boundary networks from annealing of metal recrystallization would seriously deteriorate the superconductivity. The range of total GB misorientation angles (θ) in RABiTS tapes is from 1° to 10° [12]. And the grain boundary networks in the RABiTS tapes are transferred through buffer layers to YBCO layer, which has been characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) [13]. According to the results on RABiTS process, the intra-grain J c values had similarity with the J c values in single crystal substrates [14]. The significant reduce of J c values occurred when the current went across the large angle grain boundaries. With the θ increasing to 6°, the J c values of YBCO films dropped significantly in the inter-grains [14, 15], demonstrating strong influence of the grain boundary networks on the current transport in YBCO films.

At present, physical vapor deposition (PVD) and trifluoroacetate precursor metalorganic deposition (MOD) have been successfully applied to fabricate YBCO-coated conductors. For PVD process, such as pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [16] and evaporation [17], the YBCO film exhibited a perfect epitaxy on the buffer layers, and the out-of-plane and in-plane alignments of YBCO films were similar to the buffer layers [18, 19]. It had been shown by EBSD that grain boundary networks of YBCO films totally copied the grain boundary networks of buffer layers. For the MOD process, the grain boundary networks were not only transferred from the buffer layer but also meandered in the YBCO films [20]. The meandering of the GBs in MOD resulted in a significant reduction in the GB misorientation angles [15]. Furthermore, the meandering of GBs was also found in the PVD-BaF2 process, which was promising technology to achieve high J c with thick (2~3 μm) YBCO films [19]. For achieving high current carry capability of the traditional PVD process, the templates with small GB misorientation angles are necessary.

Of particular, it should be noted that the buffer stacks play a key role in YBCO-coated conductors. The purpose of buffer layers is to prevent counter-diffusion of metal atoms in substrate and oxygen atoms in YBCO. In addition, buffer layers provide with a continuous, smooth, chemical inert surface and good match for the growth of YBCO films. Therefore, the buffer layers must to be epitaxially grown on the RABiTS substrates, and the lattice parameters of buffer layers should have a small mismatch with the substrate. Many oxide materials, such as Y2O3 [21], CeO2 [22], SrTiO3 [23], and La2Zr2O7 [24], have been successfully attempted. Among them, the multi-layer architecture CeO2/YSZ/Y2O3 is most widely used.

Recently, we deposited CeO2/YSZ/Y2O3 buffer layers on the RABiTS using sputtering for coated conductors, different samples of Y2O3 buffered were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and EBSD, the results showed different textures and grain boundary networks. We focus on the texture and GB development of Y2O3 seed layer which affect the current carry capacity of YBCO deposited on CeO2/YSZ/Y2O3 buffered RABiTS substrates. And a percolation model was proposed to calculate the J c of modeled samples.


RABiTS Ni-5 at.%W (NiW) tapes with 10 mm width and 80 μm thickness were produced by EVICO GmbH, Germany. The FWHM values ω-scan and Φ-scan are 5.5° and 6°, respectively. The root mean square surface roughness (R rms) of the NiW tapes was less than 5 nm over 5 × 5 μm areas.

CeO2, YSZ, and Y2O3 were served as the cap layer, barrier layer, and seed layer, respectively. The Y2O3 seed layer was deposited by direct current (DC) magnetron reactive sputtering and the YSZ and CeO2 layers by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering. Details of the experimental conditions are reported elsewhere [25]. Rocking curve (ω-scan) and Φ-scan were used to characterize the out-of-plane and in-plane texture with Bede D1 XRD, respectively. Spatially resolved maps of crystal orientation and GB misorientation angles were measured by electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD). The data were gathered in a hexagonal grid with a spacing of 1 μm in a region of 400 × 400 μm2. All data were processed by orientation image micrograph (OIM) patterns. The sample normal was parallel to the map normal. The grain boundary network maps were superimposed on the background of the grain images, and the grain misorientation angles comprise with both in-plane ([001] tilt) and out-of-plane ([100] tilt and [100] twist) misorientation.

YBCO films were deposited by PLD. In brief, a substrate temperature of 775 °C and an oxygen pressure of 200 mTorr were used for the deposition of YBCO. Critical current density (J c) measurements were performed at 77 K, using a four-probe technique and a 1 μv/cm voltage criterion [26].

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of the two samples of the Y2O3 seed layer with different textures. Both samples indicated excellent c-axis orientations. θ-2θ scan, ω-scan and Φ-scan of sample 1 showed in Fig. 1ac, which exhibited a very sharp out-of-plane and in-plane texture with FWHM values were 1.7° and 4.4°, respectively. The significant improvement in both out-of-plane and in-plane alignments of about 4° and 1.5° was observed compared with the substrate. The single-crystal-like out-of-plane texture was attributed to out-of-plane titles of Y2O3 grown on the NiW template grains [27]. Figure 1e, f shows that the FWHM values for out-of-plane and in-plane textures were 5.4° and 5.6°, respectively.
Fig. 1

θ-2θ-scan, ω-scan, and Φ-scan of two samples determined by XRD, representative of the Y2O3 seed layer used in this work. ac Sample 1, de sample 2

Figure 2 shows EBSD OIM patterns of two sample of the Y2O3. The data were color coded according to the grain misorientations of the (001) <100> orientation in the maps legend. Figure 2a shows the results of OIM for sample 1. The vast majority of Y2O3 grains had the misorientation angles with the sample normally concentrated in 2°~4°. Few grains showed green in the OIM image, which indicated that a small part of grain misorientation angles were distributed in 5°~7°. Figure 2b exhibits the OIM pattern for sample 2. The color distributions of the pattern were blue-green, green, and yellow-green, according the maps legend, the grain misorientation angles of Y2O3 were 5°~9°. Additionally, the percentages of the orientated grains within misorientation angles of less than 20° were 97 and 98 % in samples 1 and 2, respectively. Figure 3 shows (100), (110), and (111) pole figures of samples 1 and 2, which calculated by OIM from the EBSD measured data. Both samples showed pure and sharp (001) <100> cubic texture, while the poles of sample 1 in Fig. 3a were smaller than sample 2 in Fig. 3b. These results demonstrated that the biaxial texture of sample 1 was better than that of sample 2.
Fig. 2

OIM patterns of Y2O3 seed layer: a sample 1, b sample 2

Fig. 3

(100), (110), and (111) pole figures of Y2O3 seed layer calculated by EBSD data: a sample 1, b sample 2

Figure 4 shows GBs mapping of Y2O3 seed layer superimposed on the background of the grain image for samples 1 and 2, respectively. The GBs were divided into the varied misorientation angles: θ < 5°, 5° < θ < 10°, and θ > 10°. In sample 1, the GBs were almost completely concentrated of θ with 2°~5°. In Fig. 4b, the GBs from 5°~10° were not connected, and the segments were distributed in the maps. Furthermore, quite few θ values were bigger than 10°, which was shown in Fig. 4c. In sample 2, the majority of GBs allocated in 2°~10°, shown in Fig. 4d, e. And GBs with bigger than 10° were also very few. It can be seen that numerous low-angle GBs (θ < 10°) were present, while only a few high angle boundaries were detected in two samples. However, the low-angle GB distributions of two samples were quite different.
Fig. 4

Total GB misorientation angles superimposed on the micrograph: ac sample 1, df sample 2

Figure 5 presented the quantified total GB misorientation angles θ distributed in the range from 2° to 15° for sample 1 and sample 2. There was a significant number of higher θ in sample 2, with more than 39 % greater than 6° and more than 45 % greater than 3°. The sample distribution exhibited a completely different shape, peaking in the 2°~3° and decreasing monotonically. In sample 1, the θ in the range of 6°~15° accounting for the proportion of the whole range was 15 %, and the θ in the range of 2°~5° was more than 85 %.
Fig. 5

Fraction of total GB misorientation angle θ in each angular range for the samples 1 and 2

In order to verify the impact of different grain boundary networks on J c, the subsequent YSZ and CeO2 layer were deposited on the two samples by RF sputtering, and 1-μm-thick YBCO films were deposited by PLD. The J c values of YBCO deposited on samples 1 and 2 were 1.58 MA/cm2 and 0.71 MA/cm2, respectively. Traditionally, GBs of YBCO can be described in two dimensions, and the PLD-derived YBCO films exhibited a perfect epitaxy on the buffer layers. There was no change in the textures and GB networks of YBCO and buffer layers. Considering that the surface morphology of YBCO films were not very dense, the grain boundary networks of YBCO were too difficult to measure by EBSD. And hence, we assumed the grain boundary networks of the buffer layer were completely transferred to YBCO films.

In the studies of YBCO deposited on bicrystal structures [28], the relationship between J c and θ was used:
$$ {J}_{\mathrm{c}}\left(\theta \right)={J}_{\mathrm{c}}(0) \exp \left(-\theta /\alpha \right) $$

Here, J c(0) is the J c values when θ is zero and the factor α is the relationship depending on the measured temperature and magnetic fields. For our experiment, the temperature is 77 K and the magnetic field is self field. Hence, α is set at 3.4, reported in the previous literature [29]. Due to the slight change of the true in-plane (100) texture between buffer layers and YBCO films, the out-of-plane GB misorientation angles are considered in the current study, which are a combination of [100] tilt and [100] twist, for a detailed description of the EBSD Euler angle (φ1, Φ, φ2) transfer in the in-plane ([001] tilt) and out-of-plane ([100] tilt and [100] twist) misorientation [30].

Equation (1) is the current flow transport behavior in one grain boundary with certain misorientation angle θ. For RABiTS process, there are thousands of GBs in films, as referred to the GB mapping superimposed in Fig. 4. Calculation of the relationship of all the GB misorientation angles θ and J c values is very difficult. A simple model was proposed to investigate the effect of the grain boundary networks on the current transport. The EBSD data of two samples were handled by MATLAB software, and the data was incorporated into a hexagonal percolation model to calculate the J c/J c(0) of two samples.

The model is based on the percolation viewpoint, which is the current flow transport to the number of neighbor grains throwing the GBs. Figure 6 shows two possible model structures. The first is the percolation probability, which is probability of end to end percolation through the sample at a given threshold angle (θ c). Based on the threshold angle θ c, the GBs become either open or closed, while only the [100] tilt orientation grain boundaries are calculated. The second one is the area percolated, and the out-of-plane ([100] tilt and [100] twist) GB misorientation angles θ are calculated. If it is not possible for the percolation from end to end in the current transport direction, the percolation will be connected to the neighbor grains at a given threshold angle θ c. If percolation occurs, this model parameter calculating the fraction of the hexagonal point is accessible.
Fig. 6

Two possible model parameters. a Percolation probability, b area percolated

A fitting procedure program, written by MATLAB, models the GB misorientation angle θ distribution. The threshold angle θ c is defined from 1° to 20°, and for any threshold angle θ c, the GB misorientation angles θ of two samples are handled in two possible percolation models, which are plotted in Fig. 7. The solid symbols are the percolation probability, and the open symbols are the area percolated values. The curves for the possible percolation of two samples are steep. The percolation probability of sample 1 with a relatively sharp transition is between 2° and 5°. However, the transition of sample 2 is between 3° and 10°. For the model of area percolated, the transition of two samples is 1°~4° and 1°~8°, respectively. For sample 1, the curves show a sharp transition and ranges are smaller than 5°. The transition of sample 2 is broader than sample 1, which is relative to the Fig. 4 results.
Fig. 7

Percolation probability and area percolated of the two samples, the percolation probability data are indicated by open symbols, and the area percolated is indicated by full symbols

The full curves in Fig. 7 showed the percolation data was fitted by Boltzmann function. The form of the Boltzmann function is as follows
$$ f(x)={\mathrm{k}}_2+\left({\mathrm{k}}_1-{\mathrm{k}}_2\right)/\left(1+ \exp \left(\left(\mathrm{x}-\xi \right)/\delta \right)\right) $$
J c/J c(0) was calculated through the percolation data by Eqs. (1) and (2):
$$ {J}_c/{J}_c(0)={\displaystyle \int f(x){J}_c(x)}dx $$
Table 1 shows the results calculated by Eq. (3). For the model of percolation probability, the J c/J c(0) of samples 1 and 2 were only 0.347 and 0.186, respectively. And for the model of area percolated, the J c/J c(0) of the two samples were 0.898 and 0.361, respectively. Due to significant difference in grain boundary misorientation angle θ distribution of two samples, there was a significant disparity in the J c results of the model calculated. Plainly, the model of the area percolated was closed to the true current transport mode and true J c results in Table 1. As the vast majority of GB misorientation angles θ distributed in smaller than 5°, the J c values could reach 90 % of J c(0).
Table 1

The results of the two models, which were calculated by Eq. (3)


Percolation probability

Area percolated

J c of YBCO

Sample 1

J c/J c(0) = 0.347

J c/J c(0) = 0.898

1.58 MA/cm2

Sample 2

J c/J c(0) = 0.186

J c/J c(0) = 0.361

0.71 MA/cm2

J c sample 1: J c sample 2





We investigated the significant differences in J c values of GB misorientation angles θ. For a high-quality buffer layer, the improved alignment of the out-of-plane texture and GB misorientation angles were indicated by XRD and EBSD. A simple percolation model was used to simulate the current flow in different samples. The enhancement of the current carry capacity of the YBCO films was attributed to GB misorientation angles θ of the buffer layer.



We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 91421110, National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2014AA032702), National Basic Research Program (973) of China through Grant No. 2015CB358600, Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Research Team Funding (No.2011JTD0006), and Sichuan Provincial Fund for Distinguished Young Academic and Technology Leaders (No. 2014JQ0011) for this work.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China


  1. Kromann R, Bilde‐Sørensen J, De Reus R, Andersen N, Vase P, Freltoft T (1992) Relation between critical current densities and epitaxy of YBa2Cu3O7 thin films on MgO(100) and SrTiO3(100). J Appl Phys 71:3419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Takeuchi K, Amemiya N, Nakamura T, Maruyama O, Ohkuma T (2011) Model for electromagnetic field analysis of superconducting power transmission cable comprising spiraled coated conductors. Supercond Sci Tech 24:085014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Li XH, Zhou YG, Han L, Zhang D, Zhang JY, Qiu QQ, Dai ST, Zhang ZF, Xia D, Zhang GM, Lin LZ, Xiao LY, Zhu SW, Bai HB, Bian B, Li SP, Gao WN (2011) Design of a high temperature superconducting generator for wind power applications. IEEE T Appl Supercond 21:1155View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Redwing R, Hinaus B, Rzchowski M, Heinig N, Davidson B, Nordman J (1999) Observation of strong to Josephson-coupled crossover in 10° YBa2Cu3Ox bicrystal junctions. Appl Phys Lett 75:3171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinig N, Redwing R, Nordman J, Larbalestier D (1999) Strong to weak coupling transition in low misorientation angle thin film YBa2Cu3O7−x bicrystals. Phys Rev B 60:1409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimos D, Chaudhari P, Mannhart J (1990) Superconducting transport properties of grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7 bicrystals. Phys Rev B 41:4038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Horide T, Matsumoto K, Yoshida Y, Mukaida M, Ichinose A, Horii S (2008) Tilt angle dependences of vortex structure and critical current density at low-angle grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−x films. Phys Rev B 77:132502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Iijima Y, Tanabe N, Kohno O, Ikeno Y (1992) In-plane aligned YBa2Cu3O7−x thin films deposited on polycrystalline metallic substrates. Appl Phys Lett 60:769View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xiong J, Matias V, Tao BW, Li YR, Jia QX (2014) Ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties of epitaxial BiFeO3-BiMnO3 films on ion-beam-assisted deposited TiN buffered flexible Hastelloy. J Appl Phys 115:17D913View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Norton DP, Goyal A, Budai JD, Christen DK, Kroeger DM, Specht ED, He Q, Saffian B, Paranthaman M, Klabunde CE (1996) Epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7 on biaxially textured nickel (001): an approach to superconducting tapes with high critical current density. Science 274:755View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiong J, Chen Y, Qiu Y, Tao BW, Qin WF, Cui XM, Li YR (2007) Preparation and characterization of CeO2/YSZ/CeO2 buffer layers for YBCO coated conductors. J Mater Sci Technol 23:457Google Scholar
  12. Goyal A, Ren S, Specht E, Kroeger D, Feenstra R, Norton D, Paranthaman M, Lee D, Christen D (1999) Texture formation and grain boundary networks in rolling assisted biaxially textured substrates and in epitaxial YBCO films on such substrates. Micron 30:463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim S, Gurevich A, Song X, Li X, Zhang W, Kodenkandath T, Rupich M, Holesinger T, Larbalestier D (2006) Mechanisms of weak thickness dependence of the critical current density in strong-pinning ex situ metal–organic-deposition-route YBa2Cu3O7−x coated conductors. Supercond Sci Tech 19:968View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldmann DM, Larbalestier DC, Verebelyi DT, Zhang W, Li Q, Riley G, Feenstra R, Goyal A, Lee DF, Paranthaman M (2001) Mechanisms of weak thickness dependence of the critical current density in strong-pinning ex situ metal–organic-deposition-route YBa2Cu3O7−x coated conductors. Appl Phys Lett 79:3998View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Feldmann D, Holesinger T, Cantoni C, Feenstra R, Nelson N, Larbalestier D, Verebelyi D, Li X, Rupich M (2006) Grain orientations and grain boundary networks of YBa2Cu3O7−δ films deposited by metalorganic and pulsed laser deposition on biaxially textured Ni–W substrates. J Mater Res 21:923View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Aytug T, Paranthaman M, Kang B, Sathyamurthy S, Goyal A, Christen D (2001) La0.7Sr0.3MnO3: a single, conductive-oxide buffer layer for the development of YBa2Cu3O7−δ coated conductors. Appl Phys Lett 79:2205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bindi M, Botarelli A, Gauzzi A, Gianni L, Ginocchio S, Holzapfel B, Baldini A, Zannella S (2004) High critical current density in YBCO coated conductors prepared by thermal co-evaporation. Supercond Sci Tech 17:512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldmann DM, Reeves JL, Polyanskii A, Kozlowski G, Biggers RR, Nekkanti RM, Maartense I, Tomsic M, Barnes P, Oberly CE (2000) High critical current density in YBCO coated conductors prepared by thermal co-evaporation. Appl Phys Lett 77:2906View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Holesinger T, Arendt P, Feenstra R, Gapud A, Specht E, Feldmann D, Larbalestier D (2005) Liquid mediated growth and the bimodal microstructure of YBa2Cu3O7−δ films made by the ex situ conversion of physical vapor deposited BaF2 precursors. J Mater Res 20:1216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Rupich MW, Verebelyi DT, Zhang W, Kodenkandath T, Li X (2004) Metalorganic deposition of YBCO films for second-generation high-temperature superconductor wires. MRS bulletin 29:572View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ichinose A, Kikuchi A, Tachikawa K, Akita S (1998) Deposition of Y2O3 buffer layers on biaxially-textured metal substrates. Physica C 302:51View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Xiong J, Tao B, Qin W, Tang J, Han X, Li Y (2008) Reel-to-reel continuous simultaneous double-sided deposition of highly textured CeO2 templates for YBa2Cu3O7−δ coated conductors. Supercond Sci Tech 21:025016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chung JK, Ko RK, Shi DQ, Ha HS, Kim H, Song KJ, Park C, Moon SH, Yoo SI (2005) Use of SrTiO3 as a single buffer layer for RABiTS YBCO coated conductor. IEEE T Appl Supercond 15:3020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiong J, Wang XB, Guo P, Xia YD, Zhao XH, Tao BW, Li YR (2013) Tailoring the crystallographic orientation of MOD-derived La2Zr2O7 buffer layers for coated conductors. Physica C 492:103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Xia Y, Xiong J, Zhang F, Zhang J, Wang L, Xue Y, Xu Y, Guo P, Zhao X, Tao B (2012) Reel-to-reel deposition of epitaxial double-sided Y2O3 buffer layers for coated conductors. Physica C 476:48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiong J, Matias V, Wang H, Zhai J, Maiorov B, Trugman D, Tao B, Li Y, Jia Q (2010) Much simplified ion-beam assisted deposition-TiN template for high-performance coated conductors. J Appl Phys 108:083903View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cantoni C, Specht E, Goyalb A, Li X, Rupich M (2009) Influence of oxygen deficiency on the out-of-plane tilt of epitaxial Y2O3 films on Ni-5%W tapes. J Mater Res 24:521View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Heinig N, Redwing R, Tsu IF, Gurevich A, Nordman J, Babcock S, Larbalestier D (1996) Evidence for channel conduction in low misorientation angle [001] tilt YBa2Cu3O7−x bicrystal films. Appl Phys Lett 69:577View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Verebelyi D, Christen D, Feenstra R, Cantoni C, Goyal A, Lee D, Paranthaman M, Arendt P, DePaula R, Groves J (2000) Low angle grain boundary transport in YBa2Cu3O7−δ coated conductors. Appl Phys Lett 76:1755View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Rutter N, Glowacki B, Evetts J (2000) Percolation modelling for highly aligned polycrystalline superconducting tapes. Supercond Sci Tech 13:L25View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Yang et al. 2015