Open Access

Synthesis of Si-Sb-ZnO Composites as High-Performance Anodes for Lithium-ion Batteries

  • Yongliang Li1,
  • Liang Huang1,
  • Peixin Zhang1Email author,
  • Xiangzhong Ren1 and
  • Libo Deng1
Nanoscale Research Letters201510:414

Received: 11 August 2015

Accepted: 16 October 2015

Published: 23 October 2015


The Si-Sb-ZnO composites were prepared by a chemical reduction-mechanical alloying method and were employed as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. The electrochemical performance of the Si-Sb alloy was significantly improved by the addition of ZnO nanoparticles. Especially, the initial specific charge and discharge capacities for Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite were 845.1 and 1301.5 mAh/g, respectively, while the initial coulombic efficiency was 64.9 %. The capacity remained at 690 mAh/g after 200 cycles, and the capacity retention ratio was 81.6 %, which demonstrated excellent cycling stability and rate capability of the composite materials.


Lithium-ion batteries Si-Sb-ZnO composite materials Electrochemical properties


Lithium-ion batteries are promising energy storage systems for the rapid growing field of hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles due to their high energy density and long cycle life, etc [13]. Silicon (Si) is an ideal anode material for lithium-ion battery owing to its ultrahigh specific capacity of ~4200 mAh/g, low discharging potential, and safety. However, poor electrical conductivity and the huge volume change during lithium-ion insertion/extraction processes are two critical obstacles for Si-based anode materials [4, 5].

Recently, Si-based alloys have been developed to overcome the two disadvantages; the Si-M (M = Mg [6, 7], Sn [8, 9], Ag [10, 11], Zn [12, 13], Fe [14, 15], and Ni [16, 17]) alloys are able to alleviate the volume expansion and consequently increase the cyclability for the batteries. In our previous research, the immiscible Si-Sb alloy was synthesized and demonstrated moderate electrochemical and cycling performance with a reversible capacity of 596.4 mAh/g [18]. Nevertheless, the Si-based alloy particles lose electrical contact with each other because of the huge volume expansion during charge/discharge processes. Therefore, improving the cycling stability as well as maintaining the high capacity has been an attractive research area in Si-based anode materials.

Zinc oxide (ZnO) was one of the candidates for anode materials due to its high theoretical capacity, low cost, and nature abundance [19]. However, its poor cyclability, caused by volume expansion during the charge/discharge, affects the practical application [2022]. In this work, ZnO was introduced to the binary Si-Sb materials by a chemical reduction-mechanical alloying method. ZnO has a high theoretical capacity of 978 mAh/g, which could improve the specific capacity of the composite materials. In addition, ZnO was able to effectively relieve the agglomeration of the Si-Sb alloy particles, preventing the loss of electric contact between the current collector and electrode materials induced by the volume expansion. The electrochemical performance of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) composite anodes was studied, and the dependence of the cyclic behavior of the electrodes was discussed. It was found that when the molar ratio of ZnO was 0.3, the initial specific charge capacity and specific discharge capacity of the synthesized Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite anode material were 870.3 and 1301.5 mAh/g, respectively. The addition of ZnO was able to effectively relieve the agglomeration of the Si-Sb alloy particles, resulting in greatly improved cycling stability for the Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite anode materials.


Synthesis of Materials

All reagents were of analytical quality and used without any further purification. Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite materials were synthesized by a chemical reduction-mechanical alloying method. Typically, 0.1 mol of SbCl3, C6H5Na3O7, and Zn(NO3)2 with the molar ratio of 1:25:x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) as well as a 0.2 mol aqueous solution of NaBH4 (pH > 12) were prepared, respectively. Excess amount of NaBH4 was added dropwise to the SbCl3/Zn(NO3)2 solution with strong magnetic stirring at room temperature. The solutions were aged in a water bath at 80 °C for 5 h. The precipitates were collected by centrifugation, washed with distilled water, and then mixed with 0.1 mol of Si nanopowders for the ball-milling process. The milling was performed under argon atmosphere for 15 h at 500 rpm, and the final products were dried at 120 °C for 10 h under vacuum and then stored in the Ar-filled glove box.

Physical Characterizations

The phases of the composite materials were analyzed using a D8 Advance X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument. The microstructure and morphology of the particles were observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) by a Hitachi Limited S-3400 N instrument.

Electrochemical Characterizations

To evaluate their electrochemical properties, 70 wt.% of active materials, 15 wt.% of acetylene black and 15 wt.% of carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were mixed to form slurry, which was then pressed onto a copper grid as electrodes and dried at 120 °C for 10 h under vacuum. The loading of active materials was about 1.2 mg cm−2 on the electrodes.

The electrochemical performances were measured using coin cells assembled in an argon-filled glove box; these cells contained metallic lithium foil as a counter electrode, 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)-dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 v/v) as the electrolyte, Celgard 2400 membrane as a separator, and the synthesized composite alloy as a working electrode. The galvanostatic charge/discharge performance was assessed using a CT2001A battery tester from 0.1 to 2.0 V (vs. Li+/Li) at a constant current density of 0.1 mA/cm2 at room temperature unless noted. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) from 0 to 2.0 V (vs. Li/Li+) at 0.01 mV/s and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the frequency range 105 to 0.01 Hz and with an amplitude of 5 mV were performed using a Solartron 1470e electrochemical testing system.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composites obtained by chemical reduction-mechanical alloying method. The diffraction patterns of the composites consist of Si, Sb, and ZnO peaks, indicating that there is no intermetallic compound formed in the synthesis process. The characteristic peak intensities of Si and Sb are gradually increased with the ZnO content increased from 0 to 30 wt.%, and the peak intensities decreased when the ZnO content continued to increase. The results indicate that the Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite possessed the best crystallinity. The back-scattered image of Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite presented in Fig. 2 shows that Si, Sb, and ZnO are integrated without an apparent distinction in phases. According to the EDX analysis and the element mapping, the composite is consisted of Si (10.13 at.%), Sb (10.63 at.%), and Zn (2.91 at.%) in the scanning area, which are close to theoretical values (Table 1).
Fig. 1

XRD patterns of the Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite materials

Fig. 2

SEM and the correlated elements mapping images for Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 anode material

Table 1

The quantification results of the EDX measurements for Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 anode material










Si K



Zn L



Sb L





Figure 3 shows the SEM images of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) composite materials. As shown in Fig. 3a, the Si-Sb alloy particles are with irregular morphology and some of them are aggregated to form big particles. With the addition of ZnO, the distribution of the composite becomes uniform, indicating that ZnO plays a role in preventing the reunion, reducing the mechanical stress between the particles. The Si-Sb-(ZnO) x samples were composed of tiny particles which formed homogenous secondary particles; the particle size of the nano-composite materials was about 100 nm.
Fig. 3

SEM images of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite materials with different x: 0 (a), 0.1 (b), 0.3 (c), 0.5 (d), 0.7 (e), 0.9 (f)

Figure 4a shows the curves of initial discharge and charge profiles of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) composite anodes at 0.1 mA/cm2. The similar trends of all the curves indicate that addition of ZnO hardly affects the mechanism of lithium extraction and insertion for composites. The initial discharge curves are divided into five parts. The first part shows a rapid decrease over 0.8 V, which corresponds to irreversible reaction such as the electrolyte decomposition and the formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film. A discharge plateau appears at about 0.8 V, which is likely due to the reaction of Si-Sb with lithium. The reaction is: 3Li + Si-Sb → Li3Sb + Si. The third part of the curve is from 0.8 to 0.5 V, which corresponds to the formation of various Li x Sb compounds. Another discharge plateau appears at about 0.5–0.2 V, which is contributed from the reaction of ZnO with lithium, resulting in the formation of Li2Zn5 (0.64 V), LiZn2 (0.5 V), Li2Zn3 (0.24 V), and LiZn (0.18 V), etc [23]. With the ZnO content increased, this plateau was extended. The fifth part of the curve is below 0.2 V, corresponding to the lithium reaction with Si to form Li x Si compounds [24, 25]. It is noted that the lithium intercalation potentials for the contents in Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite materials are different; they can serve as matrices for each other to buffer the volume expansion during the lithium intercalation process. Therefore, when Sb reacts with Li at about 0.8 V, Si and ZnO would buffer the volume expansion for Sb; when discharged to about 0.5 V, Si and Sb would alleviate the volume effect of ZnO; Sb and ZnO would inhibit the volume change for Si when the voltage decrease to about 0.2 V. Such processes can improve the electrochemical properties of the composite materials.
Fig. 4

Voltage profiles (a), cycling performances (b), rate capabilities (c), and electrochemical impedance spectra of Si-Sb and Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite materials (d). The inset of d is the associated equivalent circuit

Cycling performances of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite anode materials were investigated by galvanostatic charge/discharge at 0.1 mA/cm2; the results are shown in Fig. 4b. The initial discharge capacities of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) composites are 1161.2, 1262.9, 1301.5, 1159, 1146.9, and 1112.2 mAh/g, respectively. Due to the formation of Sb and Si oxides during the synthesis process which would react with lithium in the first discharge cycle, the irreversible capacities are also increased. The discharge capacities for the second cycle are 818.5, 963, 870.3, 734.4, 740.3, and 777 mAh/g, and the capacities retained at 242.4, 436.8, 690.6, 548.1, 519, and 456.7 mAh/g after 200 cycles. The Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 exhibited 2.5 times of capacity retention compared to Si-Sb alloy and showed the best cycling performance among the composite anode materials. It was demonstrated that with the addition of ZnO, the electrochemical performance of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x was significantly improved (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The reason is that ZnO has a high theoretical capacity of 978 mAh/g, which could improve the specific capacity of the composite materials. In addition, ZnO was able to effectively relieve the agglomeration of the Si-Sb alloy particles, preventing the loss of electric contact between the current collector and electrode materials induced by volume expansion.

To confirm the superior electrochemical properties of the Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite material, the performance at different current densities was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 4c, the anodes discharged at increasing current densities during the preceding 60 cycles. The initial discharge capacities of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4) are 1260, 1267.3 and 1004 mAh/g, respectively, and the average specific capacities decreased as the current density increased. The anode materials became fully lithiated at a low current density, therefore exhibiting high capacities; while at high current densities, the diffusion of lithium ions in the liquid phase and solid electrode are different, resulting in different equilibrium rates for the reactions, while the capacities decreased. The Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite anode material exhibited the highest discharge capacities among the three composites, even at high current density of 5 mA/cm2. When the current density varied from 5 to 0.1 mA/cm2, the discharge capacity of Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 recovered to 910.8 mAh/g, showing excellent rate capability.

Figure 4d shows the electrochemical impedance of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite anodes and the fitting results before cycling. All the plots were composed of semicircles with a large radius of curvature and sloping lines. The semicircle in the high-frequency intercept represents the contact resistance without lithium insertion, charge transfer, and lithium-ion diffusion at the open voltage [26, 27]. The inset of Fig. 4d shows the impedance responses, which were then analyzed using an equivalent circuit that takes into account all possible contributions to the impedance of the test cell, using R e as the electrolyte impedance, Q cf and R cf as the contact resistances, and Q g as the diffusive resistance, and the representative fitting results are shown in Table 2. As can be seen, the appropriate addition of ZnO decreases aggregation in the immiscible Si-Sb system, promoting electrolyte infiltration while reducing the contact resistance of the electrode. However, since the electrical conductivity of ZnO is relatively lower than the alloy, an excess of ZnO addition would lead to the increase of electrode resistance instead.
Table 2

Impedance parameters associated to Si-Sb-(ZnO) x anode materials at open circuit voltage


R e

R cf



















Cyclic voltammograms of Si-Sb and Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite material were tested in the voltage range of 0–2.0 V (vs. Li/Li+) at a scanning rate of 0.01 mV/s. As shown in Fig. 5, there is almost no change of the curve for the 2nd and 3rd cycles, indicating a high reversibility, and the relatively large difference between the Si-Sb and Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 is due to the lithium intercalation reactions with ZnO. For the cathodic scan, a low reduction peak is observed in the first cycle at 0.24 V, but disappears in subsequent cycles, corresponding to the reduction of the oxides, the decomposition of the electrolyte, and the formation of SEI film. A strong reduction peak appeared at about 0.8 V and persisted through subsequent cycles, which corresponded to Sb in the Si-Sb alloy reacting with Li to form Li3Sb. Afterwards, a series of peaks appeared after 0.6 V, corresponding to the reaction of ZnO with Li to form LiZn and the lithiation of Si to form a series of Li x Si alloys, etc. In the anodic scan, a series of weak peaks appeared at 0.3–0.5 V, corresponding to the de-lithiation of Li x Si, and the strong peak at 1.1 V was attributed to the formation of Si-Sb alloys.
Fig. 5

CV curves of Si-Sb (a), and Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 (b) composite materials at a scanning rate of 0.01 mV/s

Figure 6 compares the impedance response of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x and the representative fitting results after the first lithium insertion/extraction cycles. The radius of the semicircles in the low-frequency are observed to increase after the lithium insertion process which is due to the generated Li x Sb, Li x Si, and Li x Zn packed on the active particles and blocked the transport channels for lithium and electrons, resulting in an increase in the impedance. During de-lithiation process, the composites decomposed, recovering the porous electrode structure and unblocking the channels; therefore, the internal impedance decreased. It is noted that Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 shows the smallest radius of the semicircle in the low-frequency, indicating the highest electrical conductivity among the composites, which is consistent to the above results.
Fig. 6

EIS of Si-Sb-(ZnO) x anode materials after first lithium insertion (a), and extraction process (b). The inset of a is the associated equivalent circuit


Si-Sb-(ZnO) x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) composite anode materials were prepared by a chemical reduction-mechanical alloying method. The materials exhibited superior capacity and good cycling stability for lithium ion-batteries. When the molar ratio of ZnO was 0.3, the initial specific charge capacity and specific discharge capacity of the synthesized Si-Sb-(ZnO)0.3 composite anode material were 870.3 and 1301.5 mAh/g, respectively. An appropriate amount of ZnO was able to effectively relieve the agglomeration of the Si-Sb alloy particles, not only greatly shortening the lithium-ion diffusion distance, but also increasing the space available for volume expansions, resulting in greatly improved cycling stability for the Si-Sb-(ZnO) x composite anode materials. This study gives a rational direction for tailoring the components and structures of composite anode materials to improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries.



We are grateful for the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant #51374146, 50874074), Shenzhen Government’s Plan of Science and Technology (Grant #JCYJ20120613173950029, JCYJ20140418095735619).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University


  1. Waag W, Fleischer C, Sauer D (2014) Critical review of the methods for monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles. J Power Sources 258:321–39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Scrosati B, Hassoun J, Sun Y (2011) Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ Sci 4:3287–95View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Tarascon J, Armand M (2001) Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414:359–67View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ma D, Cao Z, Hu A (2014) Si-based anode materials for Li-ion batteries: a mini review. Nano-Micro Lett 6:347–58View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liang B, Liu Y, Xu Y (2014) Silicon-based materials as high capacity anodes for next generation lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 267:469–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yan J, Huang H, Zhang J, Yang Y (2008) The study of Mg2Si/carbon composites as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 175:547–52View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim H, Choi J, Sohn H, Kang T (1999) The insertion mechanism of lithium into Mg2Si anode material for Li-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 146:4401–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hatchard T, Obrovac M, Dahn J (2006) A comparison of the reactions of the SiSn, SiAg, and SiZn binary systems with Li. J Electrochem Soc 153:A282–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li J, Smith A, Sanderson R, Hatchard T, Dunlap R, Dahn J (2009) In situ #2#1 Mössbauer effect study of the reaction of lithium with Si using a Sn probe. J Electrochem Soc 156:A283–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yu Y, Gu L, Zhu C, Tsukimoto S, Aken P, Maier J (2010) Reversible storage of lithium in silver-coated three-dimensional macroporous silicon. Adv Mater 22:2247–50View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacroix-Orio L, Tillard M, Belin C (2008) Synthesis, crystal and electronic structure of Li13Ag5Si6, a potential anode for Li-ion batteries. Solid State Sci 10:5–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoon S, Park CM, Kim H, Sohn H (2007) Electrochemical properties of Si-Zn-C composite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 167:520–3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatchard T, Obrovac M, Dahn J (2005) Electrochemical reaction of the Si1-xZnx binary system with Li. J Electrochem Soc 152:A2335–44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee H, Lee S (2002) Graphite-FeSi alloy composites as anode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Power Sources 112:649–54View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yu B, Kim H, Park C, Kim S, Sung J, Sohn H (2014) Si Nano-crystallites embedded in Cu-Al-Fe matrix as an anode for Li secondary batteries. Electrochim Acta 130:583–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu P, Li J, Tang Y, Xu X, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Lu T (2013) Three-dimensional mesoporous Sn-Ni@C network derived from cyanogel coordination polymers: towards high-performance anodes for lithium storage. Cryst Eng Comm 15:10340–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jia H, Stock C, Kloepsch R, He X, Badillo J, Fromm O, Votmann B, Winter M, Placke T (2015) Facile synthesis and lithium storage properties of a porous NiSi2/Si/Carbon composite anode material for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interf 7:1508–15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang J, Wang Y, Zhang P, Zhang D, Ren X (2014) Preparation and electrochemical properties of binary Si x Sb immiscible alloy for lithium ion batteries. J Alloy Compd 610:308–14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan L, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Qian Y (2014) Synthesis of urchin-like Sn-ZnO-C composite and its enhanced electrochemical performance for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 59:2006–11Google Scholar
  20. Huang X, Xia X, Yuan Y, Zhou F (2011) Porous ZnO nanosheets grown on copper substrates as anodes for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 56:4960–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang H, Pan Q, Cheng Y, Zhao J, Yin G (2009) Evaluation of ZnO nanorod arrays with dandelion-like morphology as negative electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 54:2851–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan Q, Qin L, Liu J, Wang H (2010) Flower-like ZnO-NiO-C films with high reversible capacity and rate capability for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 55:5780–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Belliard F, Irvine J (2001) Electrochemical performance of ball-milled ZnO-SnO2 systems as anodes in lithium-ion battery. J Power Sources 97:219–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li H, Huang X, Chen L, Zhou G, Zhang Z, Yu D, Mo Y, Pei N (2000) The crystal structural evolution of nano-Si anode caused by lithium insertion and extraction at room temperature. Solid State Ion 135:181–91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu Z, Zhu J, Sim D, Shi W, Tay Y, Ma J, Hng H, Yan Q (2012) In situ growth of Si nanowires on graphene sheets for Li-ion storage. Electrochim Acta 74:176–81View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Song JY, Lee HH, Wang YY, Wan C (2002) Two-and three-electrode impedance spectroscopy of lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 111:255–67View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaberšček M, Pejovnik S (1999) Time evolution of the impedance response of a passive film: a simple application to the Li/SOCl2 system. J Electrochem Soc 146:933–40View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Li et al. 2015