Open Access

Enhance photoelectrochemical hydrogen-generation activity and stability of TiO2 nanorod arrays sensitized by PbS and CdS quantum dots under UV-visible light

Nanoscale Research Letters201510:418

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1129-3

Received: 1 August 2015

Accepted: 16 October 2015

Published: 26 October 2015

Abstract

We develop a composite photoanode by sensitizing TiO2 nanorod arrays with PbS quantum dots (QDs) and CdS QDs. Benefitted from additional introduced PbS QDs and CdS QDs onto TiO2, the absorption of the composite photoanodes are broaden from UV to visible region. The experimental results showed that the PbS sandwiched between TiO2 and CdS cannot only broad the absorption properties but also improve the stability. The stability can be explained by the hole facile transmission from PbS to CdS because of the valence band offsets between PbS and CdS which cause a small energy barrier and reduce the hole accumulation. The photocurrent density reached 1.35 mA cm−2 at 0.9716 V vs. RHE (0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, under 60 mW cm−2 illumination) for TiO2/PbS/CdS. The highest photocurrent of TiO2/PbS/CdS can be explained by the smallest of total resistance (138 Ω cm−2) compared to TiO2/CdS and pristine TiO2.

Keywords

Photoelectrochemical Solar water splitting Hydrogen generation

PACS

8200008245+z 8250Fv

Background

Energy crisis is one of the great challenges of the twenty-first century facing humankind due to the excessive dependence on fossil fuels. Solar energy, as a renewable and almost inexhaustible energy, is expected as one promising candidate to resolve the upcoming crisis. Solar energy can be utilized via a variety of fashions, such as solar cells [1], photoelectrochemical (PEC) device for hydrogen production [2], thermal energy storage [3], and so on [4]. Hydrogen energy, as a clean energy, has been a promising candidate for next-generation energy. Especially, after Fujishima and Honda found the direct hydrogen generation by solar water splitting with TiO2 photoanode in 1972, PEC cells based on TiO2 for solar hydrogen production have been studied extensively [59]. This method paves a way to generate clean hydrogen energy by means of almost inexhaustible solar energy to split water (most abundant materials in Earth) mediated with wide bandgap semiconductor TiO2 (suitable bandgap, chemical stability, cost effectiveness, and environmental friendliness [10, 11]). However, the performance of devices based on wide bandgap semiconductor (ZnO, TiO2, etc.) is limited by the narrow absorption range. For TiO2 (3.0 eV for rutile TiO2, 3.2 eV for anatase TiO2), only UV light, which carries about 4 % power of sunlight, can be effectively utilized which also limits the performance of PEC for hydrogen generation. To enhance or broaden the absorption region of TiO2, massive methods have been explored, for example, introducing proper dopants [1013] and increasing specific surface area [14]. Among them, sensitizing the narrow bandgap semiconductor such as CdS [1519], CdSe [13, 15, 16], Bi2S3 [20], PbS [17, 21, 22], and CdTe [23] with TiO2 to broaden the visible absorption is emerging as an effective method. Narrow bandgap mental sulfide, such as CdS and PbS, has been investigated comprehensively for application in solar-to-hydrogen due to the considerable absorption in visible and near-infrared spectrum [2430]. However, narrow bandgap of PbS lead oxidation of S2− attributed to hole accumulation, which causes photo-corrosion and decreases the stability of devices [26, 31].

In the present work, we prepared the heterojunction of PbS QDs and CdS QDs by means of the successive ionic layer absorption and reaction (SILAR) process on TiO2 nanorod arrays. Experimental results show that fabricated photoanode based on TiO2 nanorod arrays sensitized with the PbS/CdS heterojunction could improve UV-visible absorption and boost the photocurrent density. Meanwhile, due to valence band offsets between PbS and CdS, the hole accumulation is reduced, which improved the stability of TiO2/PbS/CdS photoanode.

Methods

Preparation of Photoanodes

TiO2 nanorod arrays were prepared on FTO glass initially based on conventional solvent-based method [20]. The cleaned FTO substrate was placed upside down in a sealed Teflon reactor filled with hydrochloric acid (15 mL), deionized water (15 mL), and titanium n-butoxide (0.5 mL) at 150 °C for 8 h. After the reaction, the FTO substrate was taken out, rinsed with deionized water, and dried in ambient air. To sensitize PbS and CdS QDs, the FTO substrate covered with TiO2 nanorod arrays were sequentially dipped into various precursor solutions (Cd(Ac)2, Pb(Ac)2, and Na2S). First, the TiO2 nanorods with FTO substrate were immersed into 0.02 M methanolic solution of lead acetate (Pb(Ac)2) and 0.02 M solution of Na2S · 9H2O in methanol-water (1:1, v/v). After rinsing with methanol, PbS QDs are sensitized on TiO2 nanorods. At last, the substrate is dipped into the 0.05 M precursor solution of Cd2+ and S2− to prepare CdS QDs.

Characterization

In our experiments, three samples are prepared, i.e., pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS, for performance comparison. The morphologies are observed with a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi, S-4800) and transmission electron microscopy equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (TEM, JEM-2100F). The UV-visible absorption spectra are measured with a spectrometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu) under diffuse reflection method. The crystalline phase was recorded by X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, with a two theta value range from 10° to 90°, at 5°/min (Rigaku, D/MAX-2500). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was measured on Thermo Scientific Theta Probe XPS.

Evaluation PEC Performance

The PEC properties are studied with an electrochemical workstation (CHI660D) with a three-electrode system in 0.35 M Na2SO3 and 0.25 M Na2S (PH = 13) electrolyte solution at room temperature. The substrate, Pt mesh, and Ag/AgCl electrode are used as working electrode, counter electrode, and reference electrode, respectively. A 150 W Xenon light source with AM1.5 filter is used to irradiate to the substrate, and the power of the solar simulator is measured to be 60 mW · cm−2. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) is recorded at a scan rate 10 mV/s, with chopped AM1.5G simulated sunlight irradiation. I–t curves were measured at 0.9716 V vs. RHE under AM1.5 irradiation. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured from 1 Hz to 100 kHz, with AC amplitude of 5 mV. IPCE measurements were taken with a tungsten light and monochromator (a standard silicon cell as a reference).

Results and Discussion

First, the morphologies, structures, and crystalline phases of the composite system are investigated via FESEM and XRD shown in Fig. 1ad. According to Fig. 1a, the fabricated TiO2 nanorod arrays covered the FTO glass uniformly. The diameter of the TiO2 nanorod is about 110 nm. Figure 1b shows the cross-section FESEM image of TiO2 nanorod arrays. The length of the TiO2 nanorod is about 3 μm. After depositing PbS QDs and CdS QDs, we can see that the QDs cover the nanorod arrays with large area from the cross-section FESEM image shown in Fig. 1c. The XRD patterns of TiO2/PbS/CdS are recorded in Fig. 1d. The diffraction peaks corresponding to SnO2 are attributed to FTO glass. The diffraction peaks are located at the  = 36.1° and 62.7° corresponding to rutile TiO2 phase.  = 30.1° and 69.1° corresponding to PbS phase. The diffraction peaks are located at the  = 70.4° corresponding to CdS phase [32]. The diffraction peaks of CdS phase is not easy to find, because some peaks are located very close to SnO2, such as  = 26.23° and 52.06° [2].
Fig. 1

The top (a) and cross-section (b) FESEM images of pristine TiO2. The cross-section FESEM of TiO2 (c) after depositing PbS and CdS QDS. XRD patterns (d) of FTO glass and TiO2/PbS/CdS

To further prove crystalline phase, the HRTEM and EDS were investigated and shown in Fig. 2. According to inset of Fig. 2a, the EDS of the nanostructure of the Ti, O, Cd, Pb, and S elements are mainly from TiO2, CdS, and PbS. C element is from the carbon film of Cu mesh. Figure 2b shows the HRTEM of the marked area in Fig. 2a. The d-spacing of (001) and (110) in Fig. 2b is consistent with rutile TiO2, which are 0.29 and 0.32 nm, respectively. The d(111) = 0.34 nm is consistent with rock salt PbS. The d(101) = 0.32 nm of CdS is shown in Fig. 2b.
Fig. 2

TEM image and EDS (a) of TiO2/PbS/CdS. HRTEM image (b) of marked area in (a)

The TiO2/PbS/CdS sample was further investigated by XPS spectrum shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3a, the photoelectron peaks of Pb 4f can be observed at 137.4 and 142.2 eV, which comes from Pb2+ ions of PbS QDs [28]. Figure 3b shows the Cd 3d peaks at 404.7 and 411.4 eV, which originates from Cd2+ ions of the CdS QDs [33, 34]. In Fig. 3c, the S 2p peaks at 161.0 and 162.2 eV can be assigned to the sulfide of PbS and CdS QDs. Therefore, PbS QDs and CdS QDs are decorated successfully on TiO2 nanorod arrays, which are verified by the XRD patterns, EDS, HRTEM, and XPS.
Fig. 3

XPS curves of Pb 4f (a), Cd 3d (b), and S2p (c)

The optical absorption behavior was illustrated in Fig. 4a. It is obvious that the absorption of TiO2/PbS/CdS is enhanced in visible spectrum in comparison with pristine TiO2 and TiO2/CdS. The photograph of pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS is shown in Fig. 4b. The white color of pristine TiO2 is shown to be absorption free in visible light. As CdS is sensitized, the yellow color implies the enhanced absorption in visible light. The brown-black color after sensitized PbS shows the stronger absorption in visible light.
Fig. 4

UV-visible absorption spectrum (a) and photograph (b) of pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS

To characterize the PEC properties of fabricated photoanodes, a three-electrode setup is used, which is shined by 150 W Xeon light source (with AM1.5 filter and 60 mW/cm2 power). The details of LSV curves with chopped illumination are shown in Fig. 5a. The current density is only 0.09 mA cm−2 for pristine TiO2 at 0.9716 V vs. RHE (0 V vs. Ag/AgCl). For TiO2/CdS, the current density increases to 0.72 mA cm−2 at 0.9716 V vs. RHE. The current density boosts to 1.35 mA cm−2 at 0.9716 V vs. RHE for TiO2/PbS/CdS, which is ascribed to the enhanced UV-visible absorption. The series of spikes located at the on or off edges of the curves indicate carrier accumulation at the electrode–electrolyte interface and slow oxygen evolving reaction kinetics [16, 20, 35]. Figure 5b shows the I–t curves at 0.9716 V vs. RHE under AM1.5 illumination. The current density of TiO2/PbS/CdS is highest compared with pristine TiO2 and TiO2/CdS. However, the TiO2/PbS/CdS sample shows more stability than sensitized PbS only [31]. This phenomenon can be attributed to the valence band (VB) offsets between PbS and CdS shown in Fig. 5c, which cause small energy barrier, allowing facile hole transmission from PbS to CdS and preventing the hole accumulation from oxidizing PbS and CdS [36]. From Fig. 5d, the IPCE curve of TiO2/PbS/CdS clearly shows the widened UV-visible light absorption region compared to TiO2/CdS, even though the IPCE of TiO2/CdS is higher than TiO2/PbS/CdS under the wavelength of 472 nm. Therefore, the photoanode with TiO2/PbS/CdS showed an enhanced PEC performance.
Fig. 5

The LSV curves (a) of pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS with chopped AM1.5 light illumination. The I–t curves (b) of pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS at 0.9716 V vs. RHE under illumination. The energy level alignment (c) at the interface between PbS and CdS. The IPCE curves (d) of pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS measured at 0.9716 V vs. RHE

In order to further investigate the underlying reason for the enhanced PEC performance of fabricated composite photoanodes, the impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of different samples and the equivalent circuit have been shown in Fig. 6. For the equivalent circuit, R s is the series resistance, R dl and C dl are the resistance and capacitance in the semiconductor, and R H and C H are the resistance and capacitance at the Helmholtz double layer [37]. As can be seen, the corresponding radii of semicircles (EIS) for pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS decrease sequentially. The smallest radii of the semicircles for TiO2/PbS/CdS compared with pristine TiO2 and TiO2/CdS mean the smallest charge-transfer impedance [38]. Also, the PEC performance can be explained by the value of total resistance (R t  = R S  + R H  + R dl ) [39]. The R t value for pristine TiO2 is 5651 Ω cm−2, for TiO2/CdS is 233 Ω cm−2, and for TiO2/PbS/CdS is 138 Ω cm−2. The lowest R t results in the highest photocurrent for TiO2/PbS/CdS compared with TiO2/CdS and pristine TiO2.
Fig. 6

EIS of and equivalent circuit pristine TiO2, TiO2/CdS, and TiO2/PbS/CdS

Conclusions

The composite photoanode for solar water splitting with sandwiched structures (TiO2/PbS/CdS) was prepared by means of facile SILAR method. By introducing PbS QDs between TiO2 nanorod arrays and CdS QDs, both the absorption efficiency and stability are improved for the fabricated PEC cell. The highest photocurrent density (1.35 mA cm−2 at 0.9716 V vs. RHE) is achieved with TiO2/PbS/CdS structure compared to that of pristine TiO2 and TiO2/CdS. At the same time, the PEC cell of TiO2/PbS/CdS is stablest under light illumination. The enhanced performance is attributed to the VB offsets between PbS and CdS, which allow facile hole transmission from PbS to CdS leading to high photon current and photo-corrosion resistance. This structure presents a promising roadmap for high performance and stability devices in solar usage field.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 61177061,11204208, and 61405088); the Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics (China Academy of Sciences); and key project of Nature Science Foundation of Tianjin No. 14JCZDJC31400.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials Physics and Preparing Technology, School of Science, Tianjin University
(2)
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China
(3)
Nanyang Technological University, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, LUMINOUS! Centre of Excellence for Semiconductor Lighting and Displays

References

  1. Leijtens T, Eperon GE, Pathak S, Abate A, Lee MM, Snaith HJ (2013) Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO2 with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells. Nat Commun 4:2885–2893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hossain MA, Koh ZY, Wang Q (2012) PbS/CdS-sensitized mesoscopic SnO2 solar cells for enhanced infrared light harnessing. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:7367–7374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Khaselev O (1988) A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting. Science 280:425–427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D (2009) Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sust Energy Rev 13:318–345View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nguyen NT, Altomare M, Yoo JE (2015) Efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution: controlled dewetting–dealloying to fabricate site-selective high-activity nanoporous Au particles on highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays. Adv Mater 27:3208–3215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Learyand R, Westwood A (2011) Carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2 photocatalysis. Carbon 49:741–772View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujishima A, Zhang XT, Trylc DA (2008) TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep 63:515–582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xiang QJ, Yu JG, Jaroniec M (2012) Synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 134:6575–6578View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Park JH, Kim S, Bard AJ (2006) Novel carbon-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with high aspect ratios for efficient solar water splitting. Nano Lett 6:24–28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu SJ, Yu JG, Jaroniec M (2011) Anatase TiO2 with dominant high-energy {001} facets: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem Mater 23:4085–4093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yu JC, Yu JG, Ho W, Jiang Z, Zhang LZ (2002) Effects of F-doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders. Chem Mater 14:3808–3816View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Yu JG, Low JX, Fang YP, Xiao J, Chen XB (2015) Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A 3:2485–2534View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cho IS, Chen ZB, Forman AJ, Kim DR, Rao PM, Jaramillo TF, Zheng X (2011) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nano Lett 11:4978–4984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Das K, De SK (2009) Optical properties of the type-II core-shell TiO2@CdS nanorods for photovoltaic applications. J Phys Chem C 113:3494–3501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo JS, Ma L, He T, Ng CF, Wang SH, Sun HD, Fan HJ (2012) TiO2/(CdS, CdSe, CdSeS) nanorod heterostructures and photoelectrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 116:11956–11963View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang J, Yan H, Wang X, Wen F, Wang Z, Fan D, Shi JY, Li C (2012) Roles of cocatalysts in Pt-PdS/CdS with exceptionally high quantum efficiency for photocatalytic hydrogen production. J Catal 290:151–157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zeng QY, Li XJ, Xi M, Wu LP, Xu Z, Zhou ZY (2013) Fabrication of TiO2/CdS/TiO2 nanotube/Ti mesh electrode and application in photoelectrocatalytic cell system for degradation of methylene blue under visible light illumination. Asian J Chem 25:8527–8532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Long LZ, Yu X, Wu LP, Li J, Li XJ (2014) Nano-CdS confined within titanate nanotubes for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light illumination. Nanotechnology 25:035603View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ai GJ, Mo R, Chen Q, Xu H, Yang S, Li HX, Zhong JX (2015) TiO2/Bi2S3 core-shell nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. RSC Adv 5:13544–13549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Buatong N, Tang IM, Pon-On W (2015) Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells having 3D-TiO2 flower-like structures on the surface of titania nanorods with CuS counter electrode. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:146–156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Yan HJ, Yang JH, Ma GJ, Wu GP, Zong X, Lei ZB, Shi JY, Li C (2009) Visible-light-driven hydrogen production with extremely high quantum efficiency on Pt-PdS/CdS photocatalyst. J Catal 266:165–168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen HM, Chen CK, Chang YC, Tsai CW, Liu RS, Hu SF, Chang WS, Chen KH (2010) Quantum dot monolayer sensitized ZnO nanowire-array photoelectrodes: true efficiency for water splitting. Angew Chem 122:6102–6105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang L, Wang XL, Yang JH, Liu G, Han JF, Li C (2013) Dual cocatalysts loaded Type I CdS/ZnS core/shell nanocrystals as effective and stable photocatalysts for H2 evolution. J Phys Chem C 117:11584–11591View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Trevisan R, Rodenas P, Gonzalez-Pedro V, Sima C, Sanchez RS, Barea EM, Mora-Sero I, Fabregat-Santiago F, Gimenez S (2013) Harnessing infrared photons for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. A PbS quantum dot based “quasi-artificial leaf”. J Phys Chem Lett 4:141–146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lian Z, Xu PP, Wang WC, Zhang DQ, Xiao SN, Li X, Li GS (2015) C60 decorated CdS/TiO2 mesoporous architectures with enhanced photostability and photocatalytic activity for H2 evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:4533–4540.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang XL, Li Y, Zhao JL, Wang SG, Li YD, Dai HT, Sun XW (2014) Advanced three-component ZnO/Ag/CdS nanocomposite photoanode for photocatalytic water splitting. J Power Sources 269:466–472.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bhandari KP, Choi H, Jeong S, Mahabaduge H, Ellingson RJ (2014) Determination of heterojunction band offsets between CdS bulk and PbS quantum dots using photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 105:131604–131608View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Q, Li X, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Yu JG (2015) CdS/Graphene nanocomposite photocatalysts. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500010Google Scholar
  30. Chen J, Wu XJ, Yin LS, Li B, Hong X, Fan ZX, Chen B, Xue C, Zhang H (2015) One-pot synthesis of CdS nanocrystals hybridized with single-layer transition-metal dichalcogenide nanosheets for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:1210–1214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang SM, Wang ZS, Huang CH (2001) The photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 electrodes modified by quantum size PbS and thoils. Synthetic Met 123:267–272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Long LZ, Li J, Wu LP, Li XJ (2014) Enhanced photocatalytic performance of platinized CdS/TiO2 by optimizing calcination temperature of TiO2 nanotubes. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 26:107–111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cao SW, Yuan YP, Fang J, Shahjamali MM, Boey FY, Barber J, Loo SCJ, Xue C (2013) In-situ growth of CdS quantum dots on g-C3N4 nanosheets for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:1258–1266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li X, Liu HL, Luo DL, Li JT, Huang Y, Li HL, Fang YP, Xu Y, Zhu L (2012) Adsorption of CO2 on heterostructure CdS (Bi2S3)/TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities in the reduction of CO2 to methanol under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J 180:151–158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurudayal, Chiam SY, Kumar MH, Bassi PS, Seng HL, Barber J, Wong LH (2014) Improving the efficiency of hematite nanorods for photoelectrochemical water splitting by doping with manganese. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5852–5859View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao LD, He JQ, Hao SQ, Wu CI, Hogan TP, Wolverton C, Dravid VP, Kanatzidis MG (2012) Raising the thermoelectric performance of p-Type PbS with endotaxial nanostructuring and valence-band offset engineering using CdS and ZnS. J Am Chem Soc 134:16327–16336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hernández S, Hidalgo D, Sacco A, Chiodoni A, Lamberti A, Cauda V, Tresso E, Saracco G (2015) Comparison of photocatalytic and transport properties of TiO2 and ZnO nanostructures for solar-driven water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:7775–7786.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang C, Fan WQ, Bai HY, Yu XQ, Chen C, Zhang RX, Shi WD (2014) Sandwich-nanostructured NiO-ZnO nanowires @ a-Fe2O3 film photoanode with a synergistic effect and p-n junction for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ChemElectroChem 1:2089–2097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gurudayal, Chee PM, Boix PP, Ge H, Yanan F, Barber J, Wong LH (2015) Core-shell hematite nanorods: a simple method to improve the charge transfer in the photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:6852–6859View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al. 2015