Open Access

Ultrasonic Substrate Vibration-Assisted Drop Casting (SVADC) for the Fabrication of Photovoltaic Solar Cell Arrays and Thin-Film Devices

Nanoscale Research Letters201510:462

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1168-9

Received: 14 October 2015

Accepted: 23 November 2015

Published: 1 December 2015

Abstract

A simple, low-cost, versatile, and potentially scalable casting method is proposed for the fabrication of micro- and nano-thin films, herein termed as ultrasonic “substrate vibration-assisted drop casting” (SVADC). The impingement of a solution drop onto a substrate in a simple process called drop casting, usually results in spreading of the liquid solution and the formation of a non-uniform thin solid film after solvent evaporation. Our previous and current supporting results, as well as few similar reports by others, confirm that imposing ultrasonic vibration on the substrate can simply convert the uncontrollable drop casting method into a controllable coating technique. Therefore, the SVADC may be used to fabricate an array of emerging thin-film solar cells, such as polymer, perovskite, and quantum-dot solar cells, as well as other small thin-film devices, in a roll-to-roll and automated fabrication process. The preliminary results demonstrate a ten-fold increase in electrical conductivity of PEDOT: PSS made by SVADC compared with the film made by conventional drop casting. Also, simple planar perovskite solar cells made here using SVADC show promising performance with an efficiency of over 3 % for a simple structure without performing process optimization or using expensive materials and treatments.

Keywords

Solution-processed solar cellsPerovskite solar cellsOrganic solar cellsDrop castingUltrasonic substrate vibrationProcess scale-up

Background

The motivation behind the development of emerging photovoltaic thin-film solar cells, such as polymer, perovskite, and quantum-dot solar cells, is their potential to be fabricated using solution-processed molecular semiconductor materials and vacuum-free scalable casting methods. Among casting methods, spin coating is widely used, but its application is limited to lab-scale and batch processes. Dip coating and doctor blading are other lab-scale casting methods, which are less controllable. Organic solar modules have been fabricated in pilot scale using a combination of some of the scalable methods [1, 2]. A scalable casting technique should be ideally, fast, low-cost in terms of solar cell materials and energy consumption, roll-to-roll fabrication compatible, touch-free, automated, controllable, and suitable to coat small areas in an array of cells. The major potentially scalable casting techniques currently under investigation for the fabrication of emerging solar cells include the inkjet printing [3], slot-die casting [4], screen printing [5], gravure printing [6], spray coating [7, 8], etc. Each of the above-mentioned scalable techniques is usually suitable for the fabrication of films with particular characteristics. For instance, inkjet printing can direct small droplets to the target to make dots, lines and thin films. It is, however, a rather low-throughput process, given that the features are fabricated based on impingement and coalescence of many individual small droplets. Slot-die casting method is not suitable for the fabrication of nano-thin films, given that a rather large amount of solution is delivered during the deposition process, making the films thick. And while spray coating is a fast and scalable technique, it generally suffers from unsteadiness, inadequate film uniformity and intactness [8, 9]. Photovoltaic thin-film solar cells or modules are usually made of an array of small cells which are interconnected in series and parallel to achieve the required voltage and current [1, 2]. The size of each cell should be kept small to achieve a higher device performance and efficiency, given that large-area thin films are more susceptible to manufacturing defects and imperfections compared to small-area films. Therefore, masks may be required to be used during the spray deposition and other casting processes to ensure that only specific areas are covered, resulting in wastage of solar cell materials. To improve the uniformity of spray-on films, we have recently developed, implemented, and tested a modified coating technique, termed as substrate vibration-assisted spray-coating (SVASC), in which during the spraying process, controlled ultrasonic vibration is imposed on the substrate [1012]. The imparted mechanical energy to the wet film leads to improvement in its uniformity as well its nano-structure and functionality. The imposed substrate vibration is also applicable to other casting methods, and has been used by others as well, such as for the fabrication of transistors [13] and nanowires [14]. It has been shown theoretically [15, 16] and experimentally [11, 12] that the imposed substrate vibration can improve or deteriorate surface wetting, depending on the amplitude, power and frequency of the imposed vibration. In the following sections, a manufacturing technique is proposed for the large scale fabrication of solar cell arrays that demonstrates continuous fabrication of solar cell layers on a solar cell module using drop casting combined with imposed substrate vibration, in a method herein termed as substrate vibration-assisted drop casting (SVADC).

Presentation of the Hypothesis

Conventional drop casting is not considered as a film formation method, due to the lack of adequate control over the film characteristics. However, drop casting when combined with imposed ultrasonic substrate vibration can become controllable. In the proposed process, a small volume of a precursor solution with low surface tension is released from a capillary tube by dripping with negligible initial velocity or it is injected with an initial velocity and is directed toward the substratet. In either case, the drop impinges on the substrate with a velocity and momentum. The drop momentum results in substantial liquid spreading on the substrate. A wetting substrate with low interfacial tension and a high drop impinging velocity facilitate drop spreading. This is usually analyzed in terms of the Weber number (We), which is the ratio of the drop inertia force to the surface tension force. The drop Reynolds number (Re) also represents the ratio of the drop inertia to the viscous force. Therefore, the solution viscosity, density, surface tension, drop size, and impinging velocity via Re and We numbers, as well as surface wetting properties control drop spreading. If the surface is not sufficiently wetting and Re and We are not large enough, the wet film may retract and recede resulting in the formation of a non-uniform thin solid film after drying. An excessively large Re and We may cause drop splashing which is an unwanted phenomenon [8, 17]. To improve drop spreading and uniformity of the deposited film, the proposed SVADC method takes advantage of imposed ultrasonic substrate vibration with controlled vibration power (amplitude) and frequency. Another part of the novelty of this work is the way that the SVADC can be employed in an automated fabrication process, which is explained later.

Testing the Hypothesis

Part of the hypothesis is backed by our previous studies on the effect of the imposed substrate vibration on topography and nano-structure of spray-on films. In one study, it has been observed that the uniformity, roughness, and electrical conductivity of spray-on PEDOT: PSS film significantly improves, if the substrate is subjected to a low-power ultrasonic vibration [11, 12]. Also, according to our unpublished data, the post treatment of wet spun-on PEDOT: PSS films by imposed substrate vibration results in up to twelve-fold increase in electrical conductivity, caused by an enhancement in the film internal and surface uniformity. The positive effect of the imposed substrate vibration on the film topography and the principle of operation of SVADC are schematically shown in Fig. 1. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the SVADC method, preliminary experiments were performed on 4-mm-sized free falling dripping drops of 1.3 wt.% PEDOT: PSS aqueous solution diluted with IPA at a volume ratio of 4:1, respectively, impinged on a smooth glass substrate from the above. In some cases, the glass substrate was placed atop a metal box attached to an ultrasonic transducer (Cheersonic Ultrasonic Co., China). The transducer was connected to a signal generator operating at a frequency of 40 kHz with variable power or vibration amplitude. More details may be found in Ref. [12]. The as-casted wet films were then dried and annealed for 25 min at 120 °C in an oven. Samples were analyzed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM; Zeiss, model LMS700, Germany). The CLSM-measured thickness and the area-averaged RMS roughness of some samples on an area of 600 × 700 μm are shown in Table 1. The results manifest that the application of imposed vibration results in significant reduction in film roughness and film thickness due to better drop spreading. Also, a larger free fall height (distance between the substrate and the initial position of the drop) results in lower roughness and thickness due to increased drop velocity and momentum at the time of impact. However, the free-fall height has nearly no effect if the power of the imposed ultrasonic vibration on the substrate is as high as 20 W, indicating that the substrate vibration is a strong factor controlling the film characteristics. The laser images of sample 2 (casted on stationary substrate with no vibration) and sample 6 (casted on vibrating substrate at 20 W) are shown in Fig. 2. It is observed that the imposed substrate vibration (Fig. 2b) results in the uniform distribution of black PEDOT: PSS grains within the film and reduced number of pinholes and imperfections. The rupture is clearly seen in the film made using conventional drop casting as shown in Fig. 2a. The electrical conductivity of the films, measured using the four-point probe method along a 6 mm straight line on the films [11] provided on the images of Fig. 2, shows an impressive ten-fold increase when ultrasonic vibration is imposed on the substrate (3.35 S cm−1 for the non-vibrating substrate versus 34.3 S cm−1 for the vibrating substrate). The slope of the I–V curves of the films, which are linear (not shown), and the film thickness were used to obtain the film electrical conductivity [11].
Fig. 1

Drop impingement and spreading on a stationary substrate (left) and a vibrating substrate (right)

Table 1

Thickness and roughness of PEDOT: PSS films made by regular drop casting and substrate vibration-assisted drop casting; vibration time = 60 s

Case #

Vibration power (W)

Free fall height (cm)

Film thickness (μm)

Film roughness (μm)

1

0

2

18.2

8.98

2

0

10

10.3

5.35

3

5

2

2.93

2.09

4

5

10

2.41

1.86

5

20

2

1.80

0.90

6

20

10

2.00

0.86

Fig. 2

Laser images of the PEDOT: PSS films made by drop casting. a Case 2 of Table 1 (stationary substrate). b Case 6 of Table 1 (vibrating substrate). Electrical conductivities are shown on the images. The image area is 600 × 700 μm

Careful evaluation of the performance of the SVADC method, however, entails design of well-thought experiments, fundamental studies, and device fabrication and testing. Here just to demonstrate the merit of the SVADC method, a single planar mixed-halide perovskite solar cell was fabricated based on the simple planar FTO-coated glass/PEDOT: PSS/CH3NH3PbI3 − x Cl x /PCBM/Al architecture. The IPA solvent was added to PEDOT: PSS aqueous solution (1.3 wt.% PEDOT: PSS dispersed in water) with the volume ratio of 3:1, respectively. The PEDOT: PSS solution was dropped onto FTO-coated glass, forming a film which was annealed on a hot plate at 120 °C for 20 min. This is the hole-transporting layer of the cell. To prepare perovskite (active or light harvesting layer) reagents, MAI was dissolved in 2-propanol to obtain a solution with a concentration of 0.1 mg mL−1, and PbCl2 was dissolved in a 3:1 volume ratio of the mixture of DMSO and DMF solvents to obtain a solution with a concentration of 0.26 mg mL−1. PbCl2 solution was drop-casted atop PEDOT: PSS film, and the formed crystalline PbCl2 film was annealed at 90 °C for 30 min; then MAI solution was dropped atop the PbCl2 film. MAI solution reacts with PbCl2 film, making the mixed-halide perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 − x Cl x film. The perovskite layer was annealed at 90 °C for 100 min. PCBM powder was dissolved in chlorobenzene forming a 50 mg mL−1 solution, and was dropped on the CH3NH3PbI3 − x Cl x layer and annealed at 80 °C for 15 min. PCBM layer helps extraction and transport of electrons to the back contact. All layers were made by conventional drop casting, as well as SVADC in a glovebox at a vibration power of 5 W at 90 s, except the Al back contact, which was deposited by thermal evaporation. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA.

The current density-voltage curves and PCE of solar cell devices were obtained by a solar simulator and a source meter (National Instruments, model NI PXI-1033, TX, USA) under AM1.5G solar irradiation with intensity of 1000 W/m2. The cells made using regular drop casting showed no or only a weak output. Figure 3 shows the current density-voltage of a cell (2 × 2 mm) made by SVADC with a PCE of 3.02 % in a cell made with minimum process optimization and using a very simple but scalable process. This efficiency is lower than the efficiency of a somewhat similar device made by spin coating and spray coating (active layer only) [18]. In Ref. [18], the thickness of each layer was optimized and Ca/Al was used as the back contact instead of Al, to improve the energy band diagram and to facilitate charge collection. Therefore, performing process optimization on each layer and using Ca/Al as the back contact can further improve the short-circuit current density, open-circuit voltage, fill factor, and therefore the efficiency of the cell made by SVADC. Device optimization process was beyond the scope of this work.
Fig. 3

Current density-voltage curve of a planar FTO-coated glass/PEDOT: PSS/CH3NH3PbI3 − x Cl x /PCBM/Al perovskite solar cell made by substrate vibration-assisted drop casting (SVADC)

Implication of the Hypothesis

The proposed coating technique, SVADC, may be used for the fabrication of small-area coatings and thin-film devices in an automated process as well. One application is the photovoltaic solar cell arrays, made of several small cells fabricated on a panel moving by a conveyor as shown in Fig. 4. One or more nozzles or capillary tubes release one or few drops of a solar cell precursor solution onto small-area vibrating substrates to form various layers of thin-film solar cells, successively. The as-casted wet film may be exposed to an irradiative heater for film drying and post annealing, a process to enhance the film nano-structure. The process is roll-to-roll compatible if flexible substrates are used. Also, several layers of a thin-film solar cell may be deposited sequentially using the same manufacturing process. The maximum effective and uniform surface area that can be obtained for application in a device depends on the surface wettability, solution properties, impingement conditions, and substrate vibration.
Fig. 4

Schematic of proposed automated manufacturing apparatus incorporating SVADC for the fabrication and heat treatment of solar cell arrays

Abbreviations

CLSM: 

confocal laser scanning microscope

DMF: 

N,N-dimethylformamide

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulfoxide

FF: 

field factor

FTO: 

fluorine-doped tin oxide

IPA: 

isopropyl alcohol

Jsc

short-circuit current density

MAI: 

CH3NH3I

PCE: 

power-conversion efficiency

PCBM: 

phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester

PEDOT: PSS: 

poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate)

RMS: 

root-mean-square

SVADC: 

substrate vibration-assisted drop casting

Voc

open-circuit voltage

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The research fund by the Shanghai Municipal Educational Commission granted to M.E. under the 2014 Oriental Scholar program is acknowledged.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute

References

  1. Yan F, Noble J, Peltola J, Wicks S, Balasubramanian S (2013) Semitransparent OPV modules pass environmental chamber test requirements. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 114:214–218View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sommer-Larsen P, Jørgensen M, Søndergaard RR, Hösel M, Krebs FC (2013) It is all in the pattern-high-efficiency power extraction from polymer solar cells through high-voltage serial connection. Energy Technol 1:15–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Eggenhuisen TM, Galagan Y, Biezemans AFKV, Slaats TMWL, Voorthuijzen WP, Kommeren S, Shanmugam S, Teunissen JP, Hadipour A, Verhees WJH, Veenstra SC, Coenen MJJ, Gilot J, Andriessen R, Groen WA (2015) High efficiency, fully inkjet printed organic solar cells with freedom of design. J Mater Chem A 3:7255–7262View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson LM (2015) Fully slot–die‐coated all‐organic solar cells. Energy Technology 3:437–442View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim J, Duraisamy N, Lee TM, Kim I, Choi KH (2015) Screen printed silver top electrode for efficient inverted organic solar cells. Mater Res Bull 70:412–415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang J, Vak D, Clark N, Subbiah J, Wong WWH, Jones DJ, Watkins SE, Wilson G (2013) Organic photovoltaic modules fabricated by an industrial gravure printing proofer. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 109:47–55View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Reale A, La Notte L, Salamandra L, Polino G, Susanna G, Brown TM, Brunetti F, Di Carlo A (2015) Spray coating for polymer solar cells: an up-to-date overview. Energy Technology 3:385–406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Eslamian M (2014) Spray-on thin film PV solar cells: advances, potentials and challenges. Coatings 4:60–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xie Y, Gao S, Eslamian M (2015) Fundamental study on the effect of spray parameters on characteristics of P3HT:PCBM active layers made by spray coating. Coatings 5:488–510View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zabihi F, Eslamian M (2015) Characteristics of thin films fabricated by spray coating on rough and permeable paper substrates. J Coat Technol Res 12:489–503View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zabihi F, Eslamian M (2015) Substrate vibration-assisted spray coating: significant improvement in conductivity and uniformity of PEDOT:PSS thin films for PV solar cells. J Coat Technol Res 12:711–719View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Habibi M, Eslamian M, Soltani-Kordshuli F, Zabihi F, Controlled wetting/dewetting through substrate vibration-assisted spray coating (SVASC). J Coatings Technol Res. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-015-9748-2.
  13. Diemer PJ, Lyle CR, Mei Y, Sutton C, Payne MM, Anthony JE, Coropceanu V, Brédas JL, Jurchescu OD (2013) Vibration-assisted crystallization improves organic/dielectric interface in organic thin-film transistors. Adv Mater 25:6956–6962View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim BG, Kim MS, Kim J (2010) Ultrasonic-assisted nanodimensional self-assembly of poly-3-hexylthiophene for organic photovoltaic cells. ACS Nano 4:2160–2166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bestehorn M (2013) Laterally extended thin liquid films with inertia under external vibrations. Phys Fluids 25:114106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shklyaev S, Khenner M, Alabuzhev AA (2008) Enhanced stability of a dewetting thin liquid film in a single-frequency vibration field. Phys Rev E 77:036320View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yarin AL (2006) Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:159–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Barrows AT, Pearson AJ, Kwak CK, Dunbar AD, Lidzey AR (2014) Efficient planar heterojunction mixed-halide perovskite solar cells deposited via spray deposition. Energy Environ Sci 7:2944–2950View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Eslamian and Zabihi. 2015