Open Access

Highly Efficient Elimination of Carbon Monoxide with Binary Copper-Manganese Oxide Contained Ordered Nanoporous Silicas

  • Jiho Lee1,
  • Hwayoun Kim1,
  • Hyesun Lee1,
  • Seojun Jang1 and
  • Jeong Ho Chang1Email author
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters201611:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1197-4

Received: 4 August 2015

Accepted: 14 December 2015

Published: 7 January 2016

Abstract

Ordered nanoporous silicas containing various binary copper-manganese oxides were prepared as catalytic systems for effective carbon monoxide elimination. The carbon monoxide elimination efficiency was demonstrated as a function of the [Mn]/[Cu] ratio and reaction time. The prepared catalysts were characterized by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, small- and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) for structural analysis. Moreover, quantitative analysis of the binary metal oxides within the nanoporous silica was achieved by inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The binary metal oxide-loaded nanoporous silica showed high room temperature catalytic efficiency with over 98 % elimination of carbon monoxide at higher concentration ratio of [Mn]/[Cu].

Keywords

Nanoporous Catalysts Carbon monoxide Elimination Copper-manganese oxide

Background

Methods to effectively eliminate carbon monoxide have attracted much attention [15]. Recently, the related materials have been reported by different groups. It would be better to cite some examples [68]. Even though these supported noble metal-based catalysts have shown high activities for carbon monoxide elimination, their further application has been limited due to difficulties in reuse, sintering at high temperature, and high cost [912]. For this reason, the development of transition metal oxide catalysts as alternatives has gained much interest.

Transition metal oxides like CuOx, MnOx, and FeOx have so far been used for the elimination of carbon monoxide in bimetallic forms [1315]. Recently, the related materials have been reported by different groups. It would be better to cite some examples [16, 17]. The binary Cu-Mn oxides have flexible metal valences (Cu1+/2+ and Mn3+/4+) which give rise to their specific properties and notable catalytic activities in carbon monoxide elimination [18, 19]. In particular, the incomplete Mn1.5Cu1.5O4 spinel structure of the binary Cu-Mn oxide catalyst was more active in the removal of carbon monoxide at room temperature than that of the same spinel structure with CuO [1921]. In addition, its level of activity in removing carbon monoxide was reduced if the catalyst was calcined at a temperature above 500 °C, at which the crystallization of the spinel occurs.

Porous materials are typically used for separation, biological immobilization, catalysts, and supports, because of their high surface area and unique physical and chemical properties [2227]. Porous materials such as zeolites have also been employed as supports for metal oxide nanoparticles for the removal of carbon monoxide [28, 29]. However, such materials limit the incorporation of nanoparticles into the micropores, as well as the diffusion of the reactant, due to irregular micropores. For these reasons, ordered porous structures with high surface area and mesopore size, such as MCM-41 and SBA-15, have been widely used as catalyst supports [26, 27]. Consequently, various metal oxide-loaded mesoporous silica catalysts, such as Fe/SBA-15, CuO/SBA-15, and CuO-CeO2/SBA-15, have been studied and observed to provide improved performance in carbon monoxide elimination [23, 30, 33]. However, as yet, there has been little study of binary CuMnOx-loaded mesoporous silica for the elimination of gaseous phase carbon monoxide.

Herein, we report on binary CuMnOx-loaded mesoporous silica catalysts, prepared using a co-precipitation method, and their catalytic performance for gaseous carbon monoxide elimination, achieved at ambient temperature with various types of [Mn]/[Cu] ratios. This co-precipitation method allowed for room temperature synthesis of amorphous binary CuMnOx with high catalytic activity for CO elimination at room temperature. The CO elimination results demonstrate that CuMnOx@MS-4 (with a [Mn]/[Cu] volume ratio of 4/1) can efficiently achieve >98 % elimination of CO gas within 420 min at room temperature.

Methods

Materials

Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene) triblock copolymer (Pluronic P123, PEO20PPO70PEO20), hydrochloric acid, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), manganese nitrate hexahydrate, and copper nitrate trihydrate were used from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were used as received without any further purification.

Synthesis of Ordered Mesoporous Silica (MS)

The ordered mesoporous silica support was synthesized following our previously reported method [23, 24]. Tri-block copolymer Pluronic P123 was dissolved in aqueous hydrochloric acid solution (1 < pH < 2) under vigorous stirring at 40 °C. A clear solution was obtained by incubating a complete dissolution of the surfactant. The tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) was added into the solution at 40 °C as a silica source. The mixture was aged in a stainless steel bomb at 120 °C overnight. The precipitate was filtered, washed with excess water, air-dried at room temperature, and calcined at 550 °C.

Synthesis of Binary Metal Oxide-Loaded Ordered Mesoporous Silica Catalysts (CuMnOx@MS)

The CuMnOx@MS catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation method at ambient temperature with an aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2 and Mn(NO3)2. An aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2°3H2O (0.25 M) and Mn(NO3)2°6H2O (0.25 M) was pre-mixed and impregnated into the mesoporous silica. The CuMnOx@MS catalysts were synthesized as a function of various molar ratios of [Mn]/[Cu]. The compositions were in the range of [Mn]/[Cu] 1/1 (CuMnOx@MS-1), 2/1 (CuMnOx@MS-2), and 4/1 (CuMnOx@MS-4), respectively. Subsequently, an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (2 M) was added to maintain the pH at 8. The composite was aged for 2 h and heated to 80 °C. The composite was recovered by filtration and washed several times with hot deionized water, air-dried at room temperature, and calcined at 400 °C for 2 h.

Characterization

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) patterns were obtained on a Rigaku DMAX-2500 diffractometer using Cu-K α radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at 40 kV and 20 mA. The SAXS measurements were collected in the range 0.5°–4° of 2θ with a scanning speed of 2°min−1. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) patterns were recorded using a Rigaku DMAX-2500 Instrument with Cu-K α radiation. The samples were scanned in the range 20°–80° of 2θ with a scanning speed of 2°min−1.

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained with a Micromeritics TriStar II system. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method was utilized to calculate the surface areas. The pore size distribution curves were obtained from the desorption branch calculated by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. The morphological and structural details of the material were also studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). FE-SEM investigations were carried out with a JEOL JSM-6700 F instrument using 10 kV of accelerating voltage. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) attached to the electron microscopy was used to qualitatively determine the elements present. HR-TEM was carried out on a JEOL JEM-4010 electron microscope operated at 400 kV. Cross-sectional slices of CuMnOx@MS, less than 60 nm in thickness, were prepared by using an ultramicrotome. To determine Cu, Mn, and Si ion contents in the various catalysts, the dried samples were weighed and digested with a mixed solution of phosphoric acid and ammonium metavanadate solution in sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric acid by heating. And then the Cu, Mn, and Si contents were analyzed, using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer instrument).

CO Elimination Test

The detection of CO elimination was performed by IR with a JASCO FTIR-460 spectrometer (resolution 4 cm−1, integration 20 times) and measured at room temperature. A sample was placed in an IR gas cell with KBr windows, and no treatment was applied before the measurement of elimination activity. 0.5 g of CuMnOx@MS catalyst was used in the IR gas cell. CO gas (50 mL) was added to the IR gas cell. The IR spectrum was obtained every 10 min at room temperature. The schematic of the CO elimination efficiency evaluation setup composed of a JASCO FTIR-460 spectrometer is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Results and Discussion

Scheme 1 shows the preparation of the CuMnOx@MS catalysts used for highly efficient CO removal, using the method of co-precipitation and calcination as a function of [Mn] concentration. The Cu-Mn metal precursors were impregnated into the pore channels and then calcined to metal oxide at 400 °C. This approach enables the facile development of binary CuMnOx nanoparticles in the highly ordered mesopores, which results in effective CO removal
Scheme 1

Preparation of binary CuMnOx@MS catalysts with various [Mn]/[Cu] concentrations

.
TEM and FE-SEM images were obtained to investigate the morphology and diameter of the binary CuMnOx particles. The TEM images (Fig. 1a) of mesoporous silica show the highly ordered arrangement of the pore channels and reveal the hexagonally ordered channels and frameworks of CuMnOx@MS-4 as well as the binary metal oxides located inside the pores (Fig. 1b, c). With the increase of [Mn] concentration, ordered 2D hexagonal mesostructures can also be observed. These results mean that binary CuMnOx nanoparticles were located in the mesoporous silica channels, and the CuMnOx nanoparticles were highly stable because of the protection of the mesoporous silica channels. FE-SEM images (Fig. 1d, e, f) clearly confirm that the cylinder-like morphology of the as-prepared mesoporous silica was maintained for all the catalysts, indicating no evident damage to the framework during the calcination process for metal oxide impregnation. For the CuMnOx@MS catalysts, nanoparticles cannot be seen outside the mesopore channels. In addition, the degree of dispersion of the binary CuMnOx nanoparticles in the mesoporous silica was further elucidated by EDX mapping (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The images show the distribution of binary CuMnOx nanoparticles at a resolution of ~1 μm, and the uniform X-ray intensities of Cu and Mn signals in the sample CuMnOx@MS can be clearly observed.
Fig. 1

TEM images of a mesoporous silica and b, c CuMnOx@MS-4. FE-SEM images of d CuMnOx@MS-1, e CuMnOx@MS-2, and f CuMnOx@MS-4

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of mesoporous silica and CuMnOx@MS catalysts with different Mn contents are shown in Fig. 2a. All the isotherms were type IV curves with H1 type hysteresis loops [31, 32]. The preservation of the cylindrical mesostructures after the modification indicates the absence of structural damage of the mesoporous silica. With the increase in Mn contents, a significant decrease of the surface area was observed for the CuMnOx@MS catalysts, from 280 to 237 m2 · g−1, a decrease of pore volume from 0.71 to 0.64 cm3 · g−1, and pore diameter from 10.06 to 10.89 nm. Compared with the bare mesoporous silica (surface area 789 m2 · g−1, pore volume 0.64 cm3 · g−1, and pore diameter 7.82 nm), these results confirm the successful incorporation of metal oxide inside the mesoporous silica pore channels. With increasing Mn contents, the pore size distributions become wider, especially for CuMnOx@MS-4 with the highest Mn content (Fig. 2b). The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm data are listed in Table 1. Furthermore, for a quantitative analysis of the binary CuMnOx species formed in the mesopores at various Mn contents, ICP-OES measurements were carried out through titration. The back-titrated method employed was a modified version of a method reported in the literature [34]. The samples were dissolved in a HF/H3PO4 mixture by heating at 60 °C. Table 1 and Additional file 1: Figure S3 show that the ratio of weight percentage of [Mn]/[Cu] detected in the CuMnOx@MS catalysts was similar to the ratio values used in the synthesis solutions. The highest content of Mn was estimated to be 6.18 wt.% for CuMnOx@MS-4. Based on Table 1, this indicates that as the Mn contents increase, the three samples from CuMnOx@MS-1 to CuMnOx@MS-4 show decreasing pore volume and surface area. This should be because of the existence of binary CuMnOx nanoparticles in the mesostructure channels.
Table 1

Physicochemical properties of the mesoporous silica and CuMnOx@MS samples synthesized with different Mn contents

Sample

Weight percentagea

Pore diameterb (nm)

Pore volumec (cm3 · g−1)

S BET d (m2 · g−1)

Mn

Cu

Mn/Cu

MS

-

-

-

7.82

1.50

789

CuMnOx@MS-1

4.15

6.59

0.6

9.12

0.71

280

CuMnOx@MS-2

5.97

4.95

1.2

9.13

0.66

272

CuMnOx@MS-4

6.18

2.53

2.4

10.22

0.64

237

aWeight percentage determined by ICP-OES

bAdsorption average pore size calculated by BJH method

cTotal pore volume was estimated at a relative pressure

dSpecific surface area computed using BET equation in relative pressure of p/p 0 = 0.05–0.3

Fig. 2

a Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and b pore-size distribution of the (a) highly ordered mesoporous silica, (b) CuMnOx@MS-1, (c) CuMnOx@MS-2, and (d) CuMnOx@MS-4

The SAXS patterns for CuMnOx@MS catalysts with various [Mn]/[Cu] volume ratios are shown in Fig. 3a. As can be seen from this figure, all of the binary CuMnOx nanoparticle-loaded mesoporous silica catalysts were highly ordered, with a 2D hexagonal framework, giving well-resolved peaks indexed as (100), (110), and (200) according to the p6mm symmetry group. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Fig. 3b) of CuMnOx@MS and MS were further carried out to study the crystal phases of the impregnated nanoparticles. They show quite similar diffraction peaks at around 23° and 38° for the CuMnOx@MS sample series with different Mn contents. The average crystalline sizes can be roughly calculated by the diffraction peaks. A broad peak centered at 23° of 2θ was observed for all samples, indicating that the mesostructures of MS and CuMnOx@MS are amorphous. At 38°, the peak was observed for the CuMnOx@MS sample series, indicating that the crystal phases of binary CuMnOx were an amorphous type with a diffraction peak similar to hopcalite [35]. This may be because of the co-precipitation method or the high temperature calcination. TGA measurements (Additional file 1: Figure S4) showed that as the Mn contents increased, the three samples from CuMnOx@MS-1 to CuMnOx@MS-4 showed an increase in thermal stability and reduction of weight loss. This should be because of the synergistic effect of binary CuMnOx nanoparticles in the mesostructure channels.
Fig. 3

a SAXS and b XRD patterns of the (a) highly ordered mesoporous silica, (b) CuMnOx@MS-1, (c) CuMnOx@MS-2, and (d) CuMnOx@MS-4

The catalytic property of the CuMnOx@MS was examined with an IR gas cell (with KBr windows, capacity of 50 cc, Additional file 1: Figure S1) containing CO gas at ambient temperature. Two major bands were seen at 2117 and 2171 cm−1 corresponding to ν co stretching (Fig. 4a). Moreover, the intensity of gaseous CO peaks decreased gradually as a function of time. For the typical CuMnOx@MS-4 catalyst, over 98 % CO gas could be efficiently removed after 420 min at room temperature. The catalytic reaction rate as a function of time for the CuMnOx@MS catalysts was measured at room temperature (Fig. 4b). With increasing Mn contents, the catalytic activity slightly improved, exhibiting an increase in removal efficiency of 68, 82, and 98 % at 420 min for the CuMnOx@MS-1, CuMnOx@MS-2, and CuMnOx@MS-4, respectively.
Fig. 4

a IR spectra of the CuMnOx@MS-4 sample for elimination of gaseous CO as a function of reaction time with 0.5g catalyst, and b elimination efficiency with various CuMnOx@MS with different Mn contents at ambient temperature: (a) CuMnOx@MS-1, (b) CuMnOx @MS-2, and (c) CuMnOx@MS-4

Conclusions

In this study, binary CuMnOx nanoparticle-loaded MS catalyst was successfully synthesized by co-precipitation and demonstrated for CO elimination at room temperature. Based on detailed characterizations, including SAXS, BET, and HR-TEM techniques, the binary CuMnOx nanoparticles were determined to be amorphous type with a diffraction peak similar to hopcalite. Moreover, the catalytic activity of the CuMnOx@MS catalysts was investigated for various [Mn]/[Cu] concentrations. With increasing [Mn] concentration, the catalytic activity was increased. Among these catalysts, CuMnOx@MS-4 showed the highest catalytic activity, of over 98 % CO elimination after 420 min at room temperature. The binary Cu-Mn metal oxide-loaded MS has good potential for practical applications to decrease CO in air pollution.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Fundamental R&D Program for Core Technology of Materials funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology

References

  1. Li P, Miser DE, Rabiei S, Yadav RT, Hajaligol MR (2003) The removal of carbon monoxide by iron oxide nanoparticles. Appl Catal, B 43:151–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlsson PA, Skoglundh M (2011) Low-temperature oxidation of carbon monoxide and methane over alumina and ceria supported platinum catalysts. Appl Catal, B 101:669–675View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Judai K, Abbet S, Wörz AS, Heiz U, Henry CR (2004) Low-temperature cluster catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 126:2732–2737View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Manjula P, Arunkumar S, Manorama SV (2011) Au/SnO2 an excellent material for room temperature CO sensing. Sens Actu B 152:168–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Royer S, Duprez D (2011) Catalytic oxidation of CO over transition metal oxides. Chem Cat Chem 3:24–65Google Scholar
  6. Bastakoti BP, Torad NL, Yamauchi Y (2014) Polymeric micelle assembly for the direct synthesis of platinum-decorated mesoporous TiO2 toward highly selective sensing of acetaldehyde. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(2):854–860View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bastakoti BP, Li Y, Miyamoto N, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Abe H, Ye J et al (2014) Polymeric micelle assembly for the direct synthesis of functionalized mesoporous silica with fully accessible Pt nanoparticles toward an improved CO oxidation reaction. Chem Commun 50:9101–9104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gawande MB, Zboril R, Malgras V, Yamauchi Y (2015) Integrated nanocatalysts: a unique class of heterogeneous catalysts. J Mater Chem A 3:8241–8245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang F, Lu G (2010) Hydrogen feed gas purification over bimetallic Cu–Pd catalysts—effects of copper precursors on CO oxidation. Inter J Hydro Ener 35:7253–7260View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wojciechowska M, Lomnicki S (1999) Nitrogen oxides removal by catalytic methods. Clean Prod Proc 1:237–247Google Scholar
  11. Pârvulescu P, Grange P, Delmon B (1998) Catalytic removal of NO. Catal Today 46:233–316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Drouet C, Alphonse P, Rousset A (2001) New spinel materials for catalytic NO– CO reaction: nonstoichiometric nickel–copper manganites. Appl Catal, B 33:35–43View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Qiao B, Wang A, Yang X, Allard LF, Jiang Z, Cui Y et al (2011) Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat Chem 3:634–641View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yakimova MS, Ivanov VK, Polezhaeva OS, Trushin AA, Lermontov AS, Tretyakov YD (2009) Reaction mechanism of CO oxidation on Cu2O(111): a density functional study. Dok Chem 427:86–189Google Scholar
  15. Kameoka S, Tanabe T, Tsai A (2005) Effect of thermal treatment on activity and durability of CuFe2O4 Al2O3 composite catalysts for steam reforming of dimethyl ether. Catal Lett 100:89–93View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Morales MR, Barbero BP, Cadús LE (2006) Total oxidation of ethanol and propane over Mn-Cu mixed oxide catalysts. Appl Catal, B 67:229–236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Morales MR, Barbero BP, Cadús LE (2008) Evaluation and characterization of Mn–Cu mixed oxide catalysts for ethanol total oxidation: influence of copper content. Fuel 87:1177–1186View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Behar S, Gonzalez P, Agulhon P, Quignard F, Świerczyński D (2012) New synthesis of nanosized Cu–Mn spinels as efficient oxidation catalysts. Catal Today 189:35–41View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutchings CJ, Mirzaei AA, Joyner RW, Siddiqui MRH, Taylor SH (1998) Effect of preparation conditions on the catalytic performance of copper manganese oxide catalysts for CO oxidation. Appl Catal, A 166:143–152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Vepřek S, Cocke DL, Kehl S, Oswald HR (1986) Mechanism of deactivation of hopcalite catalysts studied by XPS, ISS, and other techniques. J Catal 100:250–263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Krämer M, Schmidt T, Stöwe K, Maier WF (2006) Structural and catalytic aspects of sol–gel derived copper manganese oxides as low-temperature CO oxidation catalyst. Appl Catal, A 302:257–263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsson P, Andersson A (2000) Oxides of copper, ceria promoted copper, manganese and copper manganese on Al2O3 for the combustion of CO, ethyl acetate and ethanol. Appl Catal, B 24:175–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee J, Chang JH (2012) Highly ordered magnetic mesoporous silicas for effective elimination of carbon monoxide. J Solid State Chem 188:100–104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee J, Lee SY, Park SH, Lee HS, Lee JH, Jeong B et al (2013) High throughput detection and selective enrichment of histidine-tagged enzymes with Ni-doped magnetic mesoporous silica. J Mater Chem B 1:610–616View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Zhang J, Gu H (2011) Adsorption and desorption behaviors of DNA with magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 27:6099–6106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu S, Chen H, Lu X, Deng C, Zhang X, Yang P (2010) Facile synthesis of copper(II)Immobilized on magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres for selective enrichment of peptides for mass spectrometry analysis. Angew Chem 122:7719–7723View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Fukuoka A, Kimura JI, Oshio T, Sakamoto Y, Ichikawa M (2007) Preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide catalyzed by platinum nanoparticles in mesoporous silica. J Am Chem Soc 129:10120–10125View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Visser T, Nijhuis TA, van der Eerden AMJ, Jenken K, Ji Y, Bras W et al (2005) Promotion effects in oxidation of CO over zeolite-supported Pt nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 109:3822–3831View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kang YM, Wan BZ (1997) Gold and iron supported on Y-type zeolite for carbon monoxide oxidation. Catal Today 35:379–392View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Patel A, Shukla P, Rufford T, Wang S, Chen J, Rudolph V et al (2011) Catalytic reduction of NO by CO over copper-oxide supported mesoporous silica. Appl Catal, A 409:55–65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Junges U, Jacobs W, Martin I, Krutzsch B, Schüth F (1995) Metal nanoparticles supported on Al-MCM-41 via in situ aqueous synthesis. J Chem Soc Chem Comm 22:2283–2284View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ledesma CLP, Perea LE, Nava R, Pawelec B, Fierro JL (2010) Supported gold catalysts in SBA-15 modified with TiO2 for oxidation of CO. Appl Catal, A 375:37–48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang C, Sun J, Yao X, Cao Y, Liu L, Ge C et al (2014) Efficient fabrication of active CuO-CeO2/SBA-15 catalysts for preferential oxidation of CO by solid state impregnation. Appl Catal, B 146:201–212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Andrade S, Hypolito R, Ulbrich HUG, Silva ML (2002) Iron(II) oxide determination in rocks and minerals. Chem Geol 182:85–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathew T, Sivaranjani K, Gnanakumar ES, Yamada Y, Kobayashi T, Gopinath CS (2012) γ-Al2−x M x Oy (M = Ti4+ through Ga3+): potential pseudo-3D mesoporous materials with tunable acidity and electronic structure. J Mater Chem 22:13484–13493View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lee et al. 2016