Open Access

Probing Sub-atomistic Free-Volume Imperfections in Dry-Milled Nanoarsenicals with PAL Spectroscopy

  • Oleh Shpotyuk1, 2Email author,
  • Adam Ingram3,
  • Zdenka Bujňáková4,
  • Peter Baláž4 and
  • Yaroslav Shpotyuk5, 6
Nanoscale Research Letters201611:10

Received: 17 October 2015

Accepted: 5 January 2016

Published: 12 January 2016


Structural transformations caused by coarse-grained powdering and fine-grained mechanochemical milling in a dry mode were probed in high-temperature modification of tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide known as β-As4S4. In respect to X-ray diffraction analysis, the characteristic sizes of β-As4S4 crystallites in these coarse- and fine-grained powdered pellets were 90 and 40 nm, respectively. Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy was employed to characterize transformations occurred in free-volume structure of these nanoarsenicals. Experimentally measured positron lifetime spectra were parameterized in respect to three- or two-term fitting procedures and respectively compared with those accumulated for single crystalline realgar α-As4S4 polymorph. The effect of coarse-grained powdering was found to result in generation of large amount of positron and positronium Ps trapping sites inside arsenicals in addition to existing ones. In fine-grained powdered β-As4S4 pellets, the positron trapping sites with characteristic free volumes close to bi- and tri-atomic vacancies were evidently dominated. These defects were supposed to originate from grain boundary regions and interfacial free volumes near aggregated β-As4S4 crystallites. Thus, the cumulative production of different positron traps with lifetimes close to defect-related lifetimes in realgar α-As4S4 polymorph was detected in fine-grained milled samples.


Nanomaterial Free-volume void Positron annihilation Positron trapping


Positron annihilation lifetime (PAL) spectroscopy is high-informative tool in studying sub-atomistic free-volume imperfections in solids affected by different nanostructurization routes [15]. With complementary mathematical algorithms allowing correct parameterization of mixed positron-electron annihilation paths in structurally complicated substances, this method (the positronics [6]) can be successfully motivated as a nanoscale alternative for conventional micro-meso-scale porosimetry exemplified by such well-approbated techniques as gas (nitrogen) sorption, mercury intrusion, and small-angle X-ray scattering [79]. Undoubtedly, further progress in this field relies on stretching possibilities for positronics to be applied for a great diversity of known nanomaterials. In this work, we track this for principally different nanostructurized objects, these being coarse- and fine-grained powdered pellets of the same high-temperature polymorph of tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide β-As4S4 extensively studied recently in view of promising anticancer functionality [1014].


The preliminary melt-quenched As50S50 alloy was used for further powdering, the known high-temperature modification of tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide β-As4S4 being dominated in this precursor.

Firstly, the small bulk pieces of this arsenical were subjected to coarse-grained powdering and sieved under 200 μm. Then, the obtained powder was compressed by compacting inside a stainless steel die under a pressure of ~0.7 GPa to produce pellets having near 6 mm in a diameter and 1 mm in a thickness. This batch of pellets composed of coarse-grained powdered (CGP) β-As4S4 polymorph was conditionally termed as β-CGP.

Other part of the prepared β-CGP was subjected to high-energy milling, which is a very effective mode of treatment of solids [15, 16]. Dry mode of treatment using planetary ball mill Pulverisette 6 (Fritsch, Germany) under a protective argon atmosphere has been applied. The preliminary powdered substance (3 g) was put into tungsten carbide WC chamber with 50 milling balls (each of d = 10 mm in a diameter) made of the same WC material. The ball-to-powder weigh ratio was 120:1, and total duration of milling performed under rotation speed of 500 rpm was 60 min. After this milling route, the fine-grained powder (FGP) marked as β-FGP was pelletized under the same conditions as described above.

The crystallographical specificity of the pellets was identified with X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), the experimental data being collected in a transmission mode using STOE STADI P diffractometer (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) with Cu Kα1-radiation as was described in more details elsewhere [14]. The crystal structures of the phases were refined by the Rietveld method with the FullProf.2 k (v.5.40) program [17]. The microstructure properties of the revealed phases (average apparent crystallite size D, e.g., size of coherently diffracting domains, average maximum strain S) were defined during the Rietveld refinement procedure by isotropic line broadening analysis implemented in this program [18].

The PAL measurements were performed for pelletized β-CGP and β-FGP samples using fast-fast coincidence system ORTEC of 230 ps resolution (the full width at half maximum) based on two Photonis XP2020/Q photomultiplier tubes coupled to BaF2 scintillator 25.4A10/2M-Q-BaF-X-N detectors (Scionix, Bunnik, Holland) and ORTEC® electronics (ORTEC, Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The radioactive 22Na isotope of low activity (~50 kBq) wrapped by the Kapton® foil (DuPont™, Circleville, OH, USA) and sealed was used as positron source sandwiched between two identical pellets. The normal-measurement statistics arranged for near 1 M elemental positron annihilation events collected at high-stabilized temperature of 22 °C and relative humidity of 35 % was employed to ensure reliable PAL measurements. The channel width of 6.15 ps allows a total number of available channels to be 8000. Three separate measurements ensure a good reproducibility of this research, the source contribution being evidenced at the level of 15 % allowing practically full compensation of input from positrons annihilated in the Kapton® foil with a lifetime of 0.372 ns.

The obtained PAL data were fitted by two (×2-decomposition) or three (×3-decomposition) single exponents under unity-normalized intensities using LT 9.0 program [19], the accuracies in lifetimes τ i and intensities I i being not worse ±0.005 ns and 0.5 %, respectively. Positron trapping formalism developed in terms of known two-state model with only one kind of defects [13, 20, 21] was utilized to parameterize mean τ av and defect-free bulk τ b lifetimes, as well as trapping rate in defects κ d , which was determined under above measurement conditions with ±0.01 ns−1 accuracy. In addition, the difference between defect-related τ d  = τ 2 and defect-free positron lifetimes (τ 2 τ b ) was taken as a signature of size of extended positron traps in terms of equivalent number of vacancies, whereas τ 2 /τ b ratio was ascribed to the nature of these defects [1]. In loosely packed media like polymers or molecular substances, the positrons can also annihilate from bound positron-electron (positronium (Ps)) states through pick-up an electron from an environment [1, 2, 20, 22]. In respect to known Tao-Eldrup formalism [1, 2], the localized Ps gives an indication on corresponding free-volume void radius R in terms of long-lived τ 3 lifetime.

Results and Discussion

The XRPD patterns of β-CGP and β-FGP pellets are shown in Fig. 1, top and bottom, respectively. The same β-As4S4 phase of C2/c space group was obviously dominated in both pellets (β-CGP and β-FGP), giving two different sets of crystallographic lattice parameters:
Fig. 1

Observed (circles) and calculated (solid line through circles) XRPD profiles for β-CGP (a) and β-FGP (b) pellets given with calculated Bragg positions (vertical ticks) for β-realgar As4S4; the difference curve is given at the bottom (solid line)

  • a = 9.9200(2), b = 9.3946(2), c = 8.9505(2) Å, and β = 101.968(2)° for β-CGP and

  • a = 9.9047(5), b = 9.4173(5), c = 9.0133(5) Å, and β = 101.246(4)° for β-FGP.

The lattice parameters of synthetic β-As4S4 are known to differ essentially in dependence on the preparation conditions [23]. The above lattice parameters are close to those observed in one of synthetic β-As4S4 prepared by Roland [24]. It is worth mentioning that effect of nanomilling in its crystallographic appearance occurs to be identical with light-induced alteration of β-As4S4 in pararealgar [23]. In both cases, the lattice parameters show similar tendencies revealing decrease in {a, β} and increase in {b, c} values. We are far from a mind on full identity between nanostructural transformations caused by light exposure and mechanochemical milling, but this result undoubtedly testifies that initial stages of both processes, connected with introducing structural disordering in a crystalline network, are indeed very similar.

The average apparent crystallite sizes D estimated for main reflexes of β-As4S4 phase (Fig. 1) approach 90.5 and 40.2 nm, while average maximum strains S achieve 0.0030 and 0.0063 for β-CGP and β-FGP, respectively. Thus, the nanomilling does not change preferential crystalline state of this arsenical but produce an obvious effect consistent with essential decrease in a size of β-As4S4 crystallites with an accompanied increase in inner strains.

Such changes in atomistic structure caused by high-energy mechanochemical milling are apparently concomitant with generation of structural defects acting as eventual positron and Ps traps in a bulk source material [4]. So, in the analysis of PAL data reflecting these possible positron-Ps traps, it is reasonably to refer the previous PAL study for monolith prototype of these pellets, such as mineral realgar α-As4S4, the known room-temperature polymorph of arsenic sulfide As4S4 [25]. Both these crystallographic modifications (α-As4S4 and β-As4S4) are substantially identical from point of their main structural fragments (the elementary cage-type As4S4 molecules possessing D 2d symmetry); they differ only by molecular packing leading to two different monoclinic lattices [26]. So, both polymorphs occur to be very similar in terms of their volume-per-atom determination. Indeed, the calculated crystallographic densities are 3.56 and 3.52 g  cm−3 for α-As4S4 and β-As4S4, respectively [27], giving nearly the same free volume averaged per one atom (~25.0 Å3).

As was shown previously [25], positron annihilation in the medium filled with cage-like As4S4 molecules (as in α-As4S4) is defined by extended free-volume positron trapping centers in the form of outer overlapped spaces attached to neighboring S atoms forming rectangular bypass line around As4S4 molecule. Such spaces possess effective negative charges (in view of electronegativity of S atoms in heteronuclear As–S bond), which makes them preferential traps due to attractive potential for positrons [3, 28]. Similar free-volume configurations are supposed to be characteristic for many other arsenic sulfide compounds such as crystalline pararealgar As4S4, orpiment As2S3, or even near-stoichiometric glassy As–S, ensuring close similarity in their defect-related lifetimes in 0.34–0.37 ns domain [3, 25, 2830]. An alternative channel of positron annihilation is expected in realgar α-As4S4 for Ps decaying in free volumes derivative from crystallographic-specific packing of cage-like As4S4 molecules. However, overall Ps yield in realgar is rather small (2–3 %) [25]; thus, the detected PAL spectra are dominated by preferential positron trapping.

The experimental PAL spectra of bulk realgar α-As4S4 can be well fitted with three single exponents evolving inputs from positron and Ps trapping, the corresponding trapping modes for ×3-deconvolution procedure being gathered in Table 1 [25]. This crystal demonstrates high enough defect-related lifetime τ 2  = 0.346 ns, τ 2 b ratio approaching 1.54 and (τ 2 b ) difference near 0.12 ns, which can be evidently attributed to relatively large ~80 Å3 free-volume voids (compared to bi- and tri-atomic vacancies) as it follows from known analytical correlations for this type of chemical environment [3032]. The calculated defect-free bulk lifetime τ b  = 0.224 ns correlates well with this parameter in similar crystalline arsenicals, such as orpiment As2S3 (τ b  = 0.242 ns) [3], but is substantially smaller than τ b  0.28–0.29 ns in glassy As2S3 with higher content of free volumes [3, 28]. However, in contrast to these compounds, the channel of o-Ps decaying with τ 3  1.873 ns lifetime is more pronounced in mineral realgar α-As4S4, while the corresponding intensity is still no more 2.6 %. Unambiguous identification of Ps-decaying channel in the reconstructed PAL spectra under such low I 3 is problematic, since this component can be admixed with uncontrolled contribution from a source [1, 2]. By inserting whole input from o-Ps decaying directly to the source, this task can be removed to other ×2-decomposition (Table 1), which results in definitely smallest defect-free bulk lifetime τ b because of uncompensated input from p-Ps decaying in the first channel. This procedure leads to nearly the same τ b  ≈ 0.223 ns, which can be accepted as a lower limit of defect-free bulk positron lifetime in realgar α-As4S4. The maximal value of τ b for α-As4S4 can be obtained by transferring to generalized ×2-decomposition (×2-gen. row in Table 1), where all trapping channels (originated from positron, o-Ps and p-Ps decaying) contribute to one defect-related component [4, 6].
Table 1

Fitting parameters and corresponding PAL trapping modes describing positron annihilation in bulk mineral α-As4S4 and powdered β-As4S4

Sample, fitting

Fitting parameters

PAL trapping modes

τ 1

I 1

τ 2

I 2

τ 3

I 3

τ b

κ d

τ 2 b

τ 2 b











α-As4S4, ×3











α-As4S4, ×2









α-As4S4, ×2-gen.









β-CGP, ×3











β-CGP, ×2









β-CGP, ×2-gen.









β-FGP, ×2









The raw PAL spectrum of β-CGP pellets reconstructed from ×3-fitting procedure is shown in Fig. 2, and corresponding trapping modes are given in Table 1. As compared to realgar α-As4S4, the positron annihilation essentially changes in this nanostructurized arsenical, especially in respect to positron trapping channel. For a more detailed analysis, the PAL spectra of both arsenicals (the mineral realgar α-As4S4 [25] and pelletized β-CGP) are compared on Fig. 3. It is obvious that the main changes occurred in β-CGP are related to depressed peak and increased slope in the histogram of annihilation counts. This tendency respectively inhibits positron trapping in β-CGP, as it follows from over 30 % reduction in I 2 intensity, and nearly the same increase in defect-related τ 2 lifetime. The channel of o-Ps decaying in β-CGP is also under significant modification, demonstrating slight increase in both τ 3 lifetime and I 3 intensity (Table 1). The calculated values of defect-free bulk lifetime τ b  = 0.235 ns is slightly enhanced as in realgar but still in a framework of above deviation for arsenicals 0.223 < τ b  < 0.241 ns. By inserting the o-Ps input directly to the source contribution, we obtained ×2-decomposition, where above positron trapping tendency was further enhanced (increase in τ 2 and decrease in I 2 ). It probably means that both positron and Ps trapping channels contribute to PAL spectra cumulatively, producing overall changes due to more stretched row of enlarged positron-Ps traps. Significant role of Ps decaying also follows from long-lived positron lifetime τ 2 exceeding characteristic level of intrinsic vacuum Ps decaying (0.5 ns) [1, 2] obtained under generalized ×2-decomposition procedure (marked as ×2-gen. in Table 1). With reference to nanostructurization processes in similar substances [4, 21, 22], we can reasonably speculate that these trapping centers in the pelletized β-CGP can be identified as grain boundaries and intergranular voids originated directly from coarse powdering.
Fig. 2

Raw PAL spectrum of β-CGP pellet reconstructed from ×3-fitting procedure at the general background of standard source contribution

Fig. 3

Comparison of raw PAL spectra for mineral realgar α-As4S4 [25] and pelletized β-CGP, the inset shows depressed peak intensity in β-CGP as compared to realgar (see text for details)

With transition to mechanochemically milled arsenical (β-FGP), the void structure of pelletized β-CGP is subjected to more substantial modification. The raw PAL spectrum of β-FGP (see Fig. 4) can be satisfactorily reconstructed only from ×2-fitting procedure, the corresponding fitting parameters and trapping modes being gathered in Table 1. Such changes are concomitant, in the first hand, with disappearing of some Ps-related traps, which were more efficient in coarse-grained β-CGP pellets. Surprisingly, the bulk defect-free positron lifetime is not changed (τ b  = 0.233 ns), and both τ 1 and τ 2 lifetimes approach very close those in realgar α-As4S4 (so only component intensities I 1 and I 2 are subjects to more essential changes). Such behavior testifies that most rough positron-Ps trapping centers of β-CGP disappear under high-energy ball milling, so that the remaining ones contribute along with native realgar-type positron traps (both with nearly the same bulk positron lifetime τ b  = 0.233 ns) to cumulative positron trapping in β-FGP.
Fig. 4

Raw PAL spectrum of β-FGP pellet reconstructed from ×2-fitting procedure at the general background of standard source contribution


Method of PAL spectroscopy employing conventional three- and two-term fitting was utilized to study free-volume structure of β-As4S4 arsenical subjected to coarse- and fine-grained powdering. The pelletized samples of coarse-grained powdered β-As4S4 demonstrate a great variety of possible positron and Ps trapping sites. Transition to fine-grained powdered β-As4S4 due to high-energy mechanochemical milling results in cumulative production of preferential positron traps with characteristic lifetimes close to defect-related lifetimes in crystalline realgar α-As4S4 polymorph. These positron traps were supposed to originate from grain boundaries and interfacial free volumes appeared near aggregated β-As4S4 crystallites.



coarse-grained powder


fine-grained powder


positron annihilation lifetime


X-ray powder diffraction



OSh is kindly grateful to SAIA (Slovak Academic Information Agency) for this research supported within National Scholarship Program of the Slovak Republic. This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (contract No. APVV-14-0103) and bilateral project SK-UA-2013-0003. The authors acknowledge the assistance in samples characterization for Pavlo Demchenko from Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Vlokh Institute of Physical Optics
Jan Dlugosz University
Opole University of Technology
Institute of Geotechnics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
Centre for Innovation and Transfer of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge, University of Rzeszow


  1. Krause-Rehberg R, Leipner H (1999) Positron annihilation in semiconductors: defect studies. Springer, HeidelbergView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jean YC, Mallon PE, Schrader DM (2003) Principles and application of positron and positronium chemistry. World Sci. Publ. Co. Pte. Ltd, New Jersy-London-Singapore-Hong KongView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Shpotyuk O, Filipecki J (2003) Free volume in vitreous chalcogenide semiconductors: possibilities of positron annihilation lifetime study. WSP, CzestochowaGoogle Scholar
  4. Nambissan PMG (2011) Probing the defects in nano-semiconductors using positrons. J Phys Conf Ser 265:012019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tuomisto F, Makkonen I (2013) Defect identification in semiconductors with positron annihilation: experiment and theory. Rev Mod Phys 85:1583–1631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shpotyuk O, Filipecki J, Ingram A, Golovchak R, Vakiv M, Klym H et al (2015) Positronics of subnanometer atomistic imperfections in solids as a high-informative struvcture characterization tool. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Thränert S, Enke D, Dlubek G, Krause-Rehberg R (2009) Positron lifetime spectroscopy on controlled pore glass porosimetry and pore size distribution. Mater Sci Forum 607:169–172View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kullmann J, Enke D, Thraenert S, Krause-Rehberg R, Inayat A (2010) Characterization of nanoporous monoliths using nitrogen adsorption and positronium annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Colloids Surf A 357:17–20View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zaleski R, Kierys A, Grochowicz M, Dziadosz M, Goworek J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of nanostructural polymer–silica composite: Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy study. J Colloid Interface Sci 358:268–276View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pastorek M, Gronesova P, Cholujova L, Bujnakova Z, Balaz P, Duraj J, Lee T-C, Sedlak J (2014) Realgar (As4S4) nanoparticles and arsenic trioxide (As2O3) induced autophagy and apoptosis in human melanoma cells in vitro. Neoplasma 61:700–709View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Baláž P, Sedlák J (2010) Arsenic in cancer treatment: challenges for application of realgar nanoparticles (a minireview). Toxins 2:1568–1581View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Baláž P, Nguyen AV, Fabián M, Cholujová D, Pastorek M, Sedlák J et al (2011) Properties of arsenic sulphide As4S4 nanoparticles prepared by high-energy milling. Powder Technol 211:232–236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Baláž P, Sedlák J, Pastorek M, Cholujová D, Vignarooban K, Bhosle S et al (2011) In-vitro testing of arsenic sulphide nanoparticles for the treatment of multiple myeloma cells. NSTI-Nanotech 3:412–415Google Scholar
  14. Bujňáková Z, Baláž P, Makreski P, Jovanovski G, Čaplovičova M, Čaplovič L et al (2015) Arsenic sulfide nanoparticles prepared by milling: properties, free-volume characterization, and anti-cancer effects. J Mater Sci 50:1973–1985View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Baláž P, Choi WS, Dutková E (2007) Mechanochemical modification of properties and reactivity of nanosized arsenic sulphide As4S4. J Phys Chem Solids 68:1178–1183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Baláž P (2008) Mechanochemistry in nanoscience and minerals engineering. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodriguez-Carvajal J, Commission on Powder Diffraction (IUCr) (2001) Recent developments of the program FullProf. Newsletter 26:12–19Google Scholar
  18. Rodriguez-Carvajal J, Roisnel T (2004) Line broadening analysis using FullProf: determination of microstructural properties. Mater Sci Forum 443–444:123–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kansy J (1996) Microcomputer program for analysis of positron annihilation lifetime spectra. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 74:235–244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Keeble DJ, Brossmann U, Puff W, Würschum R (2012) Positron annihilation studies of materials. In: Kaufmann EN (ed) Characterization of materials. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1899–1925Google Scholar
  21. Seeger A (1974) The study of defects in crystals by positron annihilation. Appl Phys 4:183–199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kullmann J, Enke D, Thraenert S, Krause-Rehberg R, Beiner M (2012) Characterization of pore filling of mesoporous host systems by means of positronium annihilation lifetime spectrodcopy (PALS). Opt Appl 42:281–286Google Scholar
  23. Bonazzi P, Menghetti S, Pratesi G, Muniz-Miranda M, Sbrana G (1996) Light-induced variations in realgar and β-As4S4: X-ray diffraction and Raman studies. Am Mineral 81:874–890Google Scholar
  24. Roland GW (1972) Concerning the α-As-S ↔ realgar inversion. Can Mineral 11:520–525Google Scholar
  25. Shpotyuk O, Ingram A, Demchenko P (2015) Free volume structure of realgar α-As4S4 by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. J Phys Chem Solids 79:49–54View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Bonazzi P, Bindi L (2008) A crystallographic review of arsenic sulfides: effects of chemical variations and changes induced by exposure to light. Z Ktistallogr 223:132–147Google Scholar
  27. Porter EJ, Sheldrick GM (1972) Crystal structure of a new crystalline modification of tetra-arsenic tetrasulphide (2,4,6,8-Tetrathia-1,3,5,7-tetra-arsatricyclo[3,3,0,03,7]. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 13:1347–1349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyla M, Filipecki J, Shpotyuk O, Popescu M, Balitska V (2007) Stoichiometric arsenic sulphoselenides as testing probes for positron trapping in chalcogenide glasses. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 9:3177–3181Google Scholar
  29. Ingram A, Golovchak R, Kostrzewa M, Wacke S, Shpotyuk M, Shpotyuk O (2012) Compositional dependences of average positron lifetime in binary As-S/Se glasses. Physica B 407:652–655View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen KO, Salmon PS, Penfold IT, Coleman PG (1994) Microvoids in chalcogenide glasses studied by positron annihilation. J Non Cryst Solids 170:57–64View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shpotyuk O, Filipecki J, Shpotyuk M, Ingram A (2014) Free volume evolution in chalcogenide glasses as probed by PAL spectroscopy. Solid State Ion 267:38–43View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Shpotyuk O, Ingram A, Shpotyuk M, Filipecki J (2014) Prediction of free-volume-type correlations in glassy chalcogenides from positron lifetime measurements. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res B 338:66–71View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Shpotyuk et al. 2016