Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Review
  • Open Access

Fabrication of Metal Nanoparticles from Fungi and Metal Salts: Scope and Application

Nanoscale Research Letters201611:98

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1311-2

  • Received: 18 November 2015
  • Accepted: 15 February 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Fungi secrete enzymes and proteins as reducing agents which can be used for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles from metal salts. Large-scale production of nanoparticles from diverse fungal strains has great potential since they can be grown even in vitro. In recent years, various approaches have been made to maximize the yield of nanoparticles of varying shape, size, and stability. They have been characterized by thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffractometry, SEM/TEM, zeta potential measurements, UV-vis, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In this review, we focus on the biogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles by fungi to explore the chemistry of their formation extracellularly and intracellularly. Emphasis has been given to the potential of metal nanoparticles as an antimicrobial agent to inhibit the growth of pathogenic fungi, and on other potential applications.

Keywords

  • Green synthesis
  • Metal nanoparticles
  • Antimicrobial
  • Fungi
  • Plant

Review

Introduction

Of all the processes developed so far, the fabrication of metal nanoparticles by the biogenic methods employing plant extract are more popular, innocuous, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly as they do not leave hazardous residues to pollute the atmosphere [16]. Chemical methods for the synthesis of nanoparticles are common, but their use is limited. The biogenic synthesis is, therefore, the best choice where inherently benign organic molecules do not pose a threat to human health and atmosphere. Microbes have a promising role in the fabrication of nanoparticles due to their natural mechanism for detoxification of metal ions through reduction that can be achieved extra- or intracellularly by bioaccumulation, precipitation, biomineralization, and biosorption [4, 712].

Use of microgranisms in the green synthesis of metal nanoparticles with special reference to the precious metals using fungi has been done [10, 1317]. Since fungi contain enzymes and proteins as reducing agents, they can be invariably used for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles from their salts. Since some fungi are pathogenic, one has to be cautious while working with them during experiment. Fungus biomass normally grows faster than those of bacteria [18] under the same conditions. Although synthesis of metal nanoparticles by bacteria is prevalent, their synthesis by fungi is more advantageous [19] because their mycelia offer a large surface area for interaction. Also, the fungi secrete fairly large amount of protein than bacteria; therefore, the conversion of metal salts to metal nanoparticles is very fast.

Engineered metal nanoparticles of varying size and shape from the diverse fungal species and yeast are listed in Table 1. Extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles involves the trapping of the metal ions on the surface of the cells and reducing them in the presence of enzymes, while intracellular synthesis occurs into the fungal cell in the presence of enzymes. Fungi secrete extracellular proteins which have been used to remove metal ions as nanoparticles. In a broad sense, the metal nanoparticles can be extensively used in different areas of agriculture and technology [2, 5, 6, 20, 21]. Many metal nanoparticles are antibacterial and find extensive uses in medicine [6, 2224]. The antibacterial efficiency is enhanced manifold when a nanoparticle of one metal is coupled with another such as those of copper and silver. Although in recent times several organisms have been investigated for the fabrication of nanoparticles, its mechanism is still not well understood. This review, therefore, focuses on the biogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles by fungi and attempts to explore the chemistry of their formation extracellularly and intracellularly.
Table 1

Engineered metal nanoparticles of varying size and shape fabricated from fungal and yeast species

Fungi and Yeast

Nanoparticles

Size (nm)

Shape

Location

References

Alternaria alternate

Au

12 ± 5

Spherical, triangular, hexagonal

Extracellular

[25]

Aspergillus clavatus

Au

24.4 ± 11

Triangular, spherical and hexagonal

Extracellular

[26]

A. flavus

Ag

8.92

Spherical

Cell wall

[27]

A. fumigatus

ZnO

1.2–6.8

Spherical and hexagonal

Extracellular

[28]

Ag

Extracellular

[29]

A. niger

Au

12.8 ± 5.6

Spherical, elliptical

[30]

Au

10–20

Polydispersed

Extracellular

[31]

A. oryzae TFR9

FeCl3

10–24.6

Spherical

[32]

A. oryzae var. viridis

Au

10–60

Various shapes (cell-free filtrate), mostly spherical (biomass)

Mycelial surface

[33]

A. sydowii

Au

8.7–15.6

Spherical

Extracellular

[34]

A. terreus

Ag

1–20

Spherical

Extracellular

[35]

A. tubingensis

Ca3P2O8

28.2

Spherical

Extracellular

[36]

Aureobasidium pullulans

Au

29 ± 6

Spherical

Intracellular

[37]

Candida albicans

Au

5

Monodispersed spherical

Cell-free extract

[38]

Au

20–40

Spherical

[39]

60–80

Non spherical

C. glabrata

CdS

20 Å, 29 Å

Hexamer

Intra- and extracellular

[40]

CdS

Intracellular

[41]

Cladosporium cladosporioides

Ag

10–100

Spherical

[42]

Colletotrichum sp.

Au

8–40

Spherical

Mycelial surface

[43]

Coriolus versicolor

Au

20–100, 100–300

Spherical and ellipsoidal

Intra- and extracellular

[44]

Ag

25–75, 444–491

Spherical

Intra- and extracellular

[45]

Cylindrocladium floridanum

Au

19.05

Spherical

Extracellular

[46]

Au

5–35

Spherical

Outer surface of the cell wall

[47]

Epicoccum nigrum

Au

5–50

Intra- and extracellular

[48]

Fusarium oxysporum

Pt

70–180

Rectangular, triangular, spherical and aggregates

[49]

CdS

Extracellular

[50]

Ag

Extracellular

[51]

Ag

20–50

Spherical

Extracellular

[14]

Au

2–50

 

-

[52, 53]

Au

8–40

Spherical, triangular

Extracellular

[54]

PbCO3, CdCO3

120–200

Spherical

Extracellular

[55]

SrCO3

10–50

Needlelike

Extracellular Extracellular

[56]

CdSe

9–15

Spherical

Extracellular

[57]

CdS

5–20

Spherical

Extracellular

[58]

TiO2

6–13

Spherical

Extracellular

[59]

BaTiO3

4–5

Spherical

Extracellular

[60]

ZrO2

3–11

Spherical

 

[61]

F. semitectum

Au

10–80

Spherical

Extracellular

[62]

Hansenula anomala

Au

14

[63]

Helminthosporum solani

Au

2–70

Spheres, rods, triangles, pentagons, pyramids, stars

Extracellular

[64]

Hormoconis resinae

Au

3–20

Spherical

Extracellular

[65]

Macrophomina phaseolina

Ag

5–40

Spherical

Cell-free filtrate

[144]

Neurospora crassa

Au

32 (3–100)

Spherical

Intracellular

[66]

Pediococcus pentosaceus

Ag

Extracellular

[67]

 

Au

Intracellular

[68]

Penicillium brevicompactum

Au

10–60

Spherical, triangular and hexagonal

Extracellular

[69]

P. fellutanum

Ag

5–25

Spherical

Extracellular

[70]

P. nagiovense AJ12

Ag

25 ± 2.8

Spherical

Cell-free filtrate

[15]

P. rugulosum

Au

20–80

Spherical, triangular, exagonal

[71]

 

20–40

Spherical

  

Penicillium sp. 1–208

Au

30–50

Spherical

Cell filtrate

[72]

Phanerochaete chrysosporium

Au

10–100

Spherical

Extracellular

[73]

Phoma glomerata

Ag

60–80

Spherical

[74]

Pichia jadinii

Au

<100

Spherical

Cytoplasm

[7]

Pleurotus sajor caju

Ag

30.5

Spherical

Extracellular

[75]

Rhizopus oryzae

Au

16–25

Spherical

Cell-free filtrate

[76]

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Au

15–20

30

Spherical

Cell wall Cytoplasm

[77]

Schizosaccharomyces pombe

CdS

18 Å, 29 Å

Intra- and extracellular

[40]

S. pombe

CdS

1–1.5

Hexagonal

Intracellular

[78]

S. pombe

CdS

  

Intracellular

[79]

Sclerotium rolfsii

Au

25.2 ± 6.8

Spherical

 

[80]

Trichoderma asperellum

Ag

13–18

Nanocrystalline

Extracellular

[81]

T. koningii

Au

30–40

Small spheres to polygons

[82]

Au

10–14

Spheres

Cell-free filtrate

[83]

T. reesei

Ag

5–50

Extracellular

[84]

T. viride

Ag

5–40

Spherical

Extracellular

[85]

Verticillium sp.

Au

Intracellular

[86]

Verticillium sp.

Au

20 ± 8

Spherical

Cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane

[87]

V. volvacea

Au

20–150

Triangular, spherical, hexagonal

[88]

Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589

Au

15

Hexagonal, triangular

Associated with cell wall

[89]

Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589

Au

 

Various shape depending on Au3+ concentration

Intracellular

[90]

Synthesis, Mechanism, and Characterization of Metal Nanoparticles

Biogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles involves bio-reduction of metal salts to elemental metal which may be stabilized by organic molecules present in the microbes such as fungi and bacteria. The other way of producing metal nanoparticles is biosorption where metal ions in the aqueous medium are bonded to the surface of the cell wall of the organisms. For large-scale production of nanoparticles, fungi and yeasts are preferred over other organisms (Figs. 1 and 2). When fungus is exposed to metal salts such as AgNO3 or AuCl4 , it produces enzymes and metabolites to protect itself from unwanted foreign matters, and in doing so, the metal ions are reduced to metal nanoparticles [91]. The fungi also produce napthoquinones and anthraquinones [9295] which act as reducing agents. Thus, a specific enzyme can act on a specific metal. For instance, nitrate reductase is essential for ferric ion reduction to iron nanoparticles. It was reported that for metal ion reduction, not only the enzyme was necessary but also an electron shuttle [14]. It is well understood that nanomaterials may be beneficial or harmful to living systems [16]. For example, Cd, Hg, Pb, and Tl nanoparticles are toxic and produce adverse effect in mammals and plants. The toxicity also depends on their shape, size, and the nature of the specific metal ion.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Synthesis of nanoparticles from fungi and yeast

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Frequently used fungi and yeasts for metal nanoparticle synthesis

Silver Nanoparticles

Major work has been done with silver nanoparticles produced by fungi extracellularly or intracellularly [29, 51]. The particle size is metal and fungi specific. The silver nanoparticles produced from the interaction of Aspergillus fumigates may not have the same dimension as those produced by Fusarium oxysporum even if the other conditions like concentration, pH, and temperature are identical [29]. The incubation time may also vary from 15 to 60 min [29, 51]. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Trichoderma reesei takes 72 h, but it is useful for large-scale production of nanoparticles. Their size ranges between 5 and 50 nm [84]. It has also been reported by Vahabi et al. [84] that manipulation of the method can produce enzymes up to 100 g/L which is unprecedented and requires confirmation. Silver nanoparticles of 20–50 nm, obtained from F. oxysporum, aggregate in spherical shape (Fig. 3) [14]. In this study, the extracellular reduction of metal ions was done by a nitrate-dependent reductase enzyme and a shuttle quinone. Sanghi et al. [45] studied the extra- and intracellular formation of silver nanoparticles by Coriolus versicolor, commonly known as white rot fungus. Extracellular production of silver nanoparticles from fungi A. fumigates [29] and Phoma sp. [96] has also been reported. In addition, the fungus, Trichoderma viride, was used to synthesize polydispersed silver nanoparticles of 5 to 40 nm at about 27 °C which showed an absorption band at 420 nm in UV-visible spectrum [85]. Antibacterial properties were tested against four bacterial strains namely, Salmonella typhi (gram-negative rods), Escherichia coli (gram-negative rods), Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive cocci), and Micrococcus luteus (gram-positive cocci). It was observed that the antibacterial activities of ampicilin, kanamycin, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol were significantly enhanced in the presence of silver nanoparticles. Geotricum sp. was found to successfully produce silver nanoparticles with particle sizes ranging from 30 to 50 nm [97]. The fungus Verticillium (from Taxus plant) has also been used to synthesize silver nanoparticles with average size of 25 ± 12 nm at room temperature [87]. It is noteworthy that silver ions were not toxic to the fungal cells, and they continued to multiply even after biosynthesis of the silver nanoparticles. Rice husk is a cheap agro-based waste material, which harbors a substantial amount of silica in the form of amorphous hydrated silica grains. Therefore, it would be an ideal material to biotransform amorphous to crystalline silica nanoparticles. Yang et al. [98] have suggested that in such cases, the nanoparticles form complexes. It must be made clear at this stage that only metal ions are bonded to the organic groups by virtue of the positive charge on them and the lone pair of electrons on the organic functional groups. In no case may a neutral metal atom be bonded to any electron-donating molecule. There is always a great deal of confusion about metal ions and metal nanoparticles. A metal ion is a positively charged particle of much smaller size than an electrically neutral metal atom. When the metal ion is bonded to the surface of the fungal cell, it undergoes reduction to form metal nanoparticles with subsequent oxidation of organic molecules whether enzyme, protein, or peptide. It is quite obvious that oxidation and reduction are simultaneous processes.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

SEM image of the Fusarium oxysporum 07 SD strain at a ×11,000 and b ×40,000 magnification [14]

Kowshik et al. [99] demonstrated the extracellular formation of 2- to 5-nm-long silver nanoparticles by a silver-tolerant yeast strain MKY3. Subramanian et al. [100] reported the effectiveness of marine yeasts (Pichia capsulata) derived from the mangrove sediments to synthesize silver nanoparticles (1.5 mM AgNO3, 0.3 % NaCl, pH 6.0, incubated at 5 °C for 24 h) that exhibited an absorption peak at 430 nm.

Extracellular biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles employing Aspergillus flavus, A. fumigates, Neurospora crassa, and Phaenerochate chrysosporium have been reported by many workers [29, 66, 101103]. Nanoparticles of Au-Ag have also been reported [53, 54]. Gericke and Pinches [104] have obtained gold nanoparticles of different shapes and sizes from fungal cultures. It has been observed that their size can be controlled by monitoring concentration, pH, and temperature of the solution. It has also been noted that intracellular synthesis yields nanoparticles of smaller size.

The exact mechanism of intracellular synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles is not known, but it is for sure that in the presence of fungi, they are formed on the surface of mycelia. It is proposed that the metal ions in the solution are attracted towards fungal mycelia by virtue of the positive charge on them and the slightly negative charge on the cell wall due to carboxylic groups on the enzyme or amino group of the protein, followed by reduction of the metal ions producing metal nanoparticles [105].

The acidophilic fungus, Verticillium sp., isolated from the taxus plant, was allowed to interact with AgNO3 solution at 28 °C for 72 h. The transformation was monitored visually and spectroscopically by a change in color of the fungal biomass. Both gold and silver nanoparticle formation were further confirmed by a comparison of their spectra before and after their exposure to the fungi. It is also significant to note that the fungi keep on growing even after the formation of silver nanoparticles, indicating that they are not toxic to the Verticillium sp. However, in most of the bacterial species, the growth is arrested showing that Ag/Au nanoparticles are toxic to them. The inhibition of bacterial cell growth in the presence of Ag nanoparticles is assumed to be a defensive mechanism to sequester the metal ions as a consequence of which the Ag+ ions are reduced or complexed with proteins in the bacterial cells. The SEM image (Fig. 4a) of Verticillium spp. exposed to AgNO3 solution for 72 h showed uniform distribution of Ag nanoparticles over the entire surface of the fungal cell [106]. EDAX also indicated an abundance of Ag nanoparticles (Fig. 4b) besides other weak peaks for C, S, P, Mg, and Na. The TEM analysis of the above sample (Fig. 5a, b) displayed scattered dark spots identified as Ag nanoparticles of 25 ± 12 nm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a SEM image of the Verticillium fungal cells after immersion in 10−4 M aqueous AgNO3 solution for 72 h (scale bar = 1 mm). b EDAX spectrum recorded from a film of fungal cells after formation of silver nanoparticles. Different X-ray emission peaks are labelled [106]

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a, b TEM images of thin sections of stained Verticillium sp. cells after reaction with Ag+ ions for 72 h at different magnifications. Scale bars in a and b correspond to 1 and 500 nm, respectively [106]

Li et al. have reported the fabrication of Ag nanoparticles of 1–20 nm from Aspergillus terreus in pretty good yields [35]. It is expected that the fungi secrete NADH as one of the components as reducing agents, which along with other ingredients, reduce the metal ions to metal nanoparticles. In order to confirm their hypothesis, NADH alone was added to AgNO3 solution which did not show any change in color. However, when NADH was added along with a fungal extract to AgNO3, the reaction started after a few minutes. It shows that NADH is a key factor in the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles, but other molecules are also essential which perhaps, catalyze the redox reaction. In many microorganisms, NADH is present as a coenzyme such as reductase secreted by A. terreus. Since NADH acts as an electron carrier and Ag+ ions as electron acceptor, reduction of Ag+ to Ag nanoparticle occurs [58, 106]. The Ag nanoparticles were examined for their antimicrobial activity. The results (Table 2) indicated that nanoparticles are broad spectrum antimicrobial agents. In some cases, they are effective even against fluconazole-resistant fungi [107].
Table 2

Size of the inhibition zone for AgNPs synthesized by Aspergillus terreus against the tested microorganisms [35]

Tested pathogenic organisms

Mean size of inhibition zone (mm)

Control

Test

Candida albicans (ATCC 90028)

9

16 ± 1

C. krusei (ATCC 6258)

10

14 ± 2

C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019)

9

13 ± 1

C. tropicalis (JLCC 30394)

10

14 ± 1

Aspergillus flavus (IFM 55648)

9

13 ± 2

A. fumigates (IFM 40808)

9

14 ± 2

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923)

9

16 ± 1

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)

9

12 ± 1

Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)

10

13 ± 1

ATCC American Type Culture Collection, USA; IFM Institute for Food Microbiology (at present the Medical Mycology Research Center, Chiba University), Japan; JLCC Culture Collection of Jilin University, Mycology Research Center, China

Control: AgNO3; test: AgNPs

Gold Nanoparticles

Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles from fungi has been reviewed very recently [17]. They are resistant to oxidation and dispersed [107] nicely. The color corresponds to the particle size in general. For instance, yellow, red, and mauve refer to large, small, and fine nanoparticles, respectively, of varying size and morphology [108]. It is claimed that gold nanoparticles can be stabilized by substances like ascorbic acid and citrate [109]. Stabilization can also be achieved by polyvinyl alcohol [110]. Enzymes are said to be responsible for the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles. The intra- or extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles by fungi is done in a simpler manner. The gold ions are trapped by the proteins and enzymes on the surface of the fungi and get reduced. They further form aggregates of large dimensions [111]. The gold nanoparticles synthesized from various sources have different properties. They have been checked for their cytotoxic effects against cancer [69]. Both the intracellular and extracellular reduction of AuCl or AuCl3 follow the same pathway [112]. Since AuCl requires one electron to give gold nanoparticles, it follows one-step reduction whereas AuCl3 requires three electrons and reduction occurs in three steps. As an example, when AuCl3 is dissolved in water, the following reactions occur at the mycelia of fungi which contain proteins, etc. and the metal nanoparticles are produced.

It is to be noted that in the event of intracellular gold nanoparticle formation, the Au3+ ions being smaller than Au+ ions penetrate or simply diffuse into the cell membrane and get reduced there. It is, however, inconclusive if diffusion of Au3+ ions into the fungal cell occurs through accumulation or absorption. As the concentration of gold nanoparticles increases, the Au3+/Au+ concentration falls. Metal nanoparticles induce oxidative stress in fungi and other microorganisms. Higher concentration of metal nanoparticles inhibits growth and protein expression [113] in Rhizopus oryzae. It is also likely that for a certain metal ion reduction, a specific type of protein is involved. However, it may be understood from hard and soft acid and base theory (HSAB) that donor acceptor complexation of metal with organic bases may occur.

Narayanan and Sakthivel [80] have demonstrated the formation of gold nanoparticles in the presence of the fungus Cylindrocladium floridanum. They noted that in 7 days, the fungi accumulated face-centered cubic (fcc) (111)-oriented crystalline gold nanoparticles on the surface of the mycelia. It was confirmed by the appearance of a characteristic peak at 540 nm in the UV-vis region. The nanoparticles are useful in degrading 4-nitrophenol where the process follows a pseudo-first-order kinetic model with the reaction rate constant of 2.67 × 10−2 m−1 with 5.07 × 10−6 mol dm−3 of gold of about 25 nm. As the reaction proceeds, an increase in gold nanoparticle concentration from 2.54 × 10−6 to 12.67 × 10−6 mol dm−3 occurs with a reduction in size from 53.2 to 18.9 nm.

Mukherjee et al. [87] have reported the formation of gold nanoparticles from Verticillium sp. which was found on the surface of mycelia. Gold nanoparticles have also been produced from Verticillium fungi. When HAuCl4 solution was added to fungal biomass, it started turning purple within a few hours of exposure while the aqueous solution of HAuCl4 remained colorless. It indicated intracellular nanoparticle formation. The morphology of Au nanoparticles does not appear to have a relationship with fungal species; as in all cases, several types of nanoparticles are formed [51, 87]. It was observed that old fungal biomass is less effective in producing Au nanoparticles than the fresh ones. It is probably due to a larger secretion of proteins and enzymes in the fresh fungal biomass than the aged ones.

Kumar et al. [64] showed the applicability of yeast species Hansenula anomala to reduce gold salt in the presence of amine-terminated polyamidoamine dendrimer as stabilizer. Lim et al. [114] used Saccharomyces cerevisae broth to synthesize gold and silver nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles of 2- to 100-nm size were prepared at pH 4–6 in 24 h which had an absorption maximum at 540 nm. Extracellular synthesis of silver NP of 10–20 nm was done at pH 8–10 in 48 h. It displayed a characteristic absorption peak at 415 nm. Gold and silver nanoparticles, with face-centered cubic structures prepared from Candida guilliermondii [115], exhibited distinct surface plasmon peaks at 530 and 425 nm, respectively. These nanoparticles were tested against five pathogenic bacterial strains. The highest efficiency for both gold and silver nanoparticles was observed against S. aureus, which indicated the applicability of yeast-synthesized nanoparticles for environmental remediation. Yarrowia lipolytica was reported to be an effective reducing agent to produce gold nanoparticles and nanoplates by varying concentrations of chloroauric acid at pH 4.5 [90]. According to the findings, a mixture of 109 cells ml−1 and 0.5 or 1.0 mM of the gold salt developed a purple or golden red color indicating the formation of gold nanoparticles. Nanoparticles of different sizes were obtained by incubating 1010 cells ml−1 with 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mM chloroauric acid. It was confirmed that an increase in salt concentration at a fixed number of cells resulted in the increase of nanoparticles. On the other hand, an increase in cell numbers at a constant gold salt concentration resulted in a significant decrease in nanoparticle size. From Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectral data, the presence of carboxyl, hydroxyl, and amide groups on the cell surfaces was confirmed.

Soni and Prakash [116] have reported the green synthesis of gold nanoparticles from Aspergillus niger and identified it by a change in color and its absorption at 530 nm. They have also suggested that broadening of the band is due to the aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Perhaps it refers to the low concentration of the nanoparticles because the peak centered at 530 nm will obviously become sharp as a result of the increased quantity of nanoparticles. They have also reported that the Au nanoparticles are toxic to Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Aedes aegypti mosquito larvae. Silver nanoparticles synthesized from Pleurotus ostreatus fungi were characterized by UV-vis, SEM, EDS, XRD, and TEM. Silver nanoparticles in solution were identified by the appearance of a peak at 440 nm in the visible region of the spectrum. XRD pattern showed their crystalline nature. The SEM and TEM images showed depressed Ag nanoparticles of nearly 50 nm. Their antimicrobial activity was tested against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria namely, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, and Vibrio cholera. It was observed that Ag nanoparticles are much less effective against the above pathogens relative to the antibiotics, but when antibiotics are fortified with Ag nanoparticles, their activity is enhanced. It is quite likely that a suitable mixture of antibiotic and Ag nanoparticles may be more effective as a medicine for drug-resistant pathogens.

Other Metal Nanoparticles

Castro-Longoria et al. [117] have produced platinum nanoparticles and their aggregates using the fungus N. crassa. Both intracellular single platinum nanoparticles of 4- to 3-nm diameter and spherical agglomerates of 20- to 110-nm diameter were produced. A comparison of platinum nanoparticles synthesized from biomass was made with those prepared from N. crassa extract. It was noticed that the platinum nanoparticles produced from the extract were only single crystal nano-agglomerates. However, the quantity of nanoparticles synthesized extracellularly differs significantly from those prepared intracellularly. Magnetite, Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles have been obtained from F. oxysporum and Verticillium sp. [118]. Extracellular synthesis of fairly smaller selenium nanoparticles of the order of 47 nm from A. terreus was also done in 60 min [119]. It was found that Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Candida glabrata were capable of intracellular production of CdS nanoparticles from cadmium salt in solution [120]. CdS nanoparticle synthesis using S. pombe has been considered to be dependent on a stress protein response [99]. Phytochelatin gets activated on exposure of S. pombe to cadmium and synthesizes phytochelatins. These phytochelatins chelate the cytoplasmic cadmium to phytochelatin–Cd complex. Thereafter, an ATP-binding cassette-type vacuolar protein transports phytochelatin–Cd complex across the vacuolar membrane. Within the vacuole, sulfide gets added to the complex to form a high-molecular-weight phytochelatin CdS−2 complex/CdS nanocrystal.

Metal Nanoparticles and Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Fungi are accountable for more than 70 % of all major crop diseases [121]. The annual crop losses due to pre- and post-harvest fungal diseases exceed 200 billion euros, and in the USA alone, over $600 million are annually spent on fungicides [122]. Impact of nanoparticles on crop plants is a rising area of research that needs to be meticulously explored. In recent years, engineered nanoparticles have achieved particular attention as a potential candidate for improving crop yield, resistance, and disease management technologies [5, 6, 123]. However, these applications are still in their infancy. This is simply due to the unprecedented and unforeseen health hazards and environmental concerns [6]. It is understood that the use of pesticides in agriculture is becoming more hazardous day by day. In order to replace such toxic materials by equally useful substances is an excellent choice, especially easily available silver nanoparticles which are antimicrobial for most of the fungal and bacterial diseases in man and plants [124, 125]. Jo et al. [126] have reported antifungal activity of Ag+ ions and Ag nanoparticles on pathogenic fungi. It is useful if a better protocol for its application in plants is developed. The Ag nanoparticles in aqueous medium catalyze complete destructive oxidation of microorganism [127]. Kim et al. [128] have studied the growth inhibition effect of three types of Ag nanoparticles against 18 different plant pathogenic fungi in vitro (Table 3). A variety of host plants including the cucumber family, tomato, potato, and cabbage, which are very prone to infections, have been treated. It has been noted that growth inhibition is concentration-dependent and the most effective concentration leading to complete destruction of fungi is 100 ppm. Possible mechanism of interaction between fungi and nanoparticles is presented in Fig. 6.
Table 3

List of plant pathogenic fungi (modified from 128)

Fungal species (KACC accession no.)

Common names

Host plants

Alternaria alternata (A-1 40019)

Alternaria leaf blight

Strawberry, pepper, tomato

Alternaria brassicicola (A-2 40857)

Black spot

Cauliflower, radish, cabbage, kale

Alternaria solani (A-3 40570)

Alternaria leaf spot

Pepper, tomato, eggplant, potato

Botrytis cinerea (B-1 40574)

Gray mold

Eggplant, tomato, potato, pepper, strawberry

Cladosporium cucumerinum (C-1 40576)

Scab

Eggplant, cucumber, pumpkin, melon

Corynespora cassiicola (C-9 40964)

Leaf spot

Pepper, cucumber, bean, tomato, sesame

Cylindrocarpon destructans (C-10 41077)

Root rot

Strawberry, ginseng, peony

Didymella bryoniae (D-1 40938)

Black rot

Cucumber, pumpkin, watermelon, melon

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinum (F-1 40525)

Fusarium wilt

Cucumber

F. oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici (F-2 40032)

Fusarium wilt

Tomato

F. oxysporum (F-3 40052)

Fusarium wilt

Tomato

Fusarium solani (F-4 41643)

Fusarium wilt

Potato, ginseng

Fusarium sp. (F-5 40050)

Fusarium rot

Potato, sweet potato, pepper, strawberry, pear tree

Glomerella cingulata (G-1 40895)

Anthracnose

Pepper, strawberry, grapevine

Monosporascus cannonballus M-1 40940)

Root rot

Cucumber, pumpkin, watermelon, melon

Pythium aphanidermatum (P-8 40156)

Damping-off

Tomato, tobacco, radish

Pythium spinosum (P-9 41060)

Root rot

Sweet potato, pumpkin, cabbage

Stemphylium lycopersici (S-3 40967)

Leaf spot

Eggplant, tomato, pepper

KACC Korean Agricultural Culture Collection, Suwon, Korea

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Possible mechanism behind fungus and nanoparticles interaction

Silver nanoparticles were used as an alternative to pesticides to control the sclerotia-forming phytopathogenic fungi [129]. The antifungal effect of doubly encapsulated silver nanoparticle solution against rose powdery mildew (leaf distortion, leaf curling, early defoliation, and reduced flowering) caused by Sphaerotheca pannosa var rosae was also studied [130]. A 10-ppm silver nanoparticle solution of 1.5 nm was sprayed over a large area infected by rose powdery mildew. After 2 days, more than 95 % of them faded out and did not recur for a week. The toxic effect of the silver nanoparticles of 5–24 nm on Colletotrichum gloesporioides, which causes anthracnose in a wide range of fruits, such as apple, avocado, mango, and papaya has also been studied [131]. A significant delay in growth of C. gloesporioides was observed. Silver nanoparticles may, therefore, be used as an alternative to fungicides for plant disease management. Das et al. [132] have reported extracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles of 10 nm from R. oryzae which was employed for the generation of nanogold-bioconjugate structure. These nanostructures displayed excellent adsorption capacity and were successfully employed to purify water free from pathogens and pesticides.

Application of Metal Nanoparticles

There are a myriad of applications of metal nanoparticles such as cosmetics, catalysts, lubricants, fuel additives, paints, agro-chemicals, food packaging, textile engineering, electronics, optics, environmental sensing, nanomedicine, drug and gene delivery agents, biodetection of pathogens, tumor destruction via heating (hyperthermia), magnetic resonance imaging, and phagokinetic studies [29, 23, 24, 133136, 139]. Fungus-mediated synthesis of metal nanoparticles is getting much attention due to their extensive application in various sectors (Table 4). Durán et al. [141] have reported that silver nanoparticles (1.6 nm) obtained extracellularly from F. oxysporum can be incorporated in clothes which can prevent infection from S. aureus. Silver nanoparticles (1–10 nm) attach to the bacterial cell surface and significantly disrupt its respiration and permeability [154]. Silver nanoparticles (5–25 nm) from A. fumigates were produced to understand the biochemical and molecular mechanism of synthesis [29]. The ability of the fungi, F. oxysporum, to hydrolyze metal complexes demonstrates the formation of metal oxide semiconducting materials [59]. Namasivayam and Avimanyu [143] have reported that when the silver nanoparticles of 45–100 nm obtained from Lecanicillium lecanii were coated on the bleached cotton fabrics using acrylic binder, they became resistant to S. aureus and E. coli infection. A method was invented to decorate the growing fungal hyphae of A. niger with a high load of gold nanoparticles, which were initially produced using aqueous tea extract as a sole reducing/stabilizing agent [155]. Heat treatment of these hybrid materials yielded porous gold microwires. It is anticipated that the nanowire-based paper may be used to clean up oil and organic pollutants in water and soil sediments. Nanofibrous mats were prepared by Spasova et al. [156], which contained chitosan and T. viride spores. It was reported that T. viride kept at 28 °C grows much faster and fights for space and nutrients against Fusarium sp. and Alternaria sp. Moreover, T. viride produces extracellular hydrolytic enzymes which directly attack the pathogen and destroy their cell walls. Advances in luminescent nanocrystals have led to fluorescent labelling by QDs with bio-recognition molecules [157]. When F. oxysporum was incubated with a mixture of CdCl2 and SeCl4, highly luminescent CdSe quantum dots were produced at room temperature (26 ± 1 °C) [153]. In addition, nitrate reductase from F. oxysporum has been shown to catalyze the production of stable silver nanoparticles in vitro. It suggests the way for designing a rational enzymatic strategy for the synthesis of nanomaterials of different composition, shape, and size [158]. An optical sensor for the detection of pesticides (Siven 85 % wettable powder) in water using ZnCdSe QD films has also been developed [159].
Table 4

Applications of metal nanoparticles synthesized by fungi and yeasts

Nanoparticle

Fungi/yeasts

Application

References

Ag

Alternaria alternata

Enhancement in antifungal activity of fluconazole against Phoma glomerata

[136]

 

Aspergillus clavatus

Antimicrobial activity

[137]

 

A. niger

Antibacterial activity

[138]

 

A. niger

Wound healing activity

[131]

 

Colletotrichum gloesporioides

Antifungal activity

[141]

 

Fusarium acuminatum

Antibacterial activity

[140]

 

F. oxysporum

Textile fabrics

[141]

 

F. solani

Textile fabric

[142]

 

Lecanicillium lecanii

Textile fabrics

[143]

 

Macrophomina phaseolina

Antimicrobial properties against multidrug-resistant bacteria

[144]

 

Penicillium oxalicum

Catalytic activity

[145]

 

Penicillium sp.

Antibacterial activity against MDR E. coli and S. aureus

[146]

 

Phytophthora infestans

Antimicrobial activity

[147]

 

Pleurotus ostreatus

Antimicrobial activity

[148]

 

Raffaelea sp.

Antifungal activity

[149]

 

Trichoderma crassum

Antimicrobial activity

[150]

 

T. viride

Vegetable and fruit preservation

[151]

Au

Aspergillus japonicus AJP01

Catalytic activity

[152]

 

A. niger

Toxic to mosquito larvae

[116]

 

Rhizopus oryzae

Water hygiene management

[132]

Cds

Saccharomyces pombe

Electric diode

[78]

 

F. oxysporum

Live cell imaging and diagnostics

[153]

Conclusions

It is an established fact that biogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles by fungi is a safe and economical process because stable and small-sized nanoparticles are generally produced. Their role in drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging, catalysis, environmental sensing, textile engineering, food sectors and plant disease management is well known. Several precious metals may be easily recovered from large heap of wastes containing metal salts. This process of producing nanoparticles by a redox process may be employed to produce pure metals. The fungi may therefore be used in metallurgical operations to sequester metal from ores. It can save time and money. Since some of the metal ions are toxic to many microbes, they can be used as a prophylactic to inhibit their growth. However, a comprehensive protocol may be developed to control the morphology of metal nanoparticles for their application in all sectors of medicine, agriculture, and technology.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to publishers for permission to adopt figures and tables in this review.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
(2)
Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. Box #196, Gondar, Ethiopia

References

  1. Song JY, Kim BS (2009) Rapid biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant leaf extracts. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:79–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y, Kumar DS (2010) Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci 179:154–163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rico CM, Majumdar S, Duarte-Gardea M, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J Agric Food Chem 59:3485–3498View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Durán N, Marcato PD, Durán M, Yadav A, Gade A, Rai M (2011) Mechanistic aspects in the biogenic synthesis of extracellular metal nanoparticles by peptide, bacteria, fungi, and plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1609–1624View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2014a) Carbon and fullerene nanomaterials in plant system. J Nanobiotechnol 12:16Google Scholar
  6. Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2014b) Phytosynthesis of nanoparticles: concept, controversy and application. Nano Res Lett 9:229Google Scholar
  7. Gericke M, Pinches A (2006) Microbial production of gold nanoparticles. Gold Bull 39:22–28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li X, Xu H, Chen ZS (2011) Chen: Biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms and their applications. J Nanomater 270974:16Google Scholar
  9. Prabhu S, Poulose EK (2012) Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int Nano Lett 2:32View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2014c) Plants and microbes assisted selenium nanoparticles: characterization and application. J Nanobiotechnol 12:28Google Scholar
  11. Iravani S (2014) Bacteria in nanoparticle synthesis: current status and future prospects. Int Schol Res Notic 18:359316Google Scholar
  12. Singh R, Shedbalkar UU, Wadhwani SA, Chopade BA (2015) Bacteriagenic silver nanoparticles: synthesis, mechanism, and applications. App Microbiol Biotechnol 99:4579–4593View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sastry M, Ahmad A, Khan MI, Kumar R (2003) Biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles using fungi and actinomycete. Cur Sci 85:162–170Google Scholar
  14. Durán N, Marcato PD, Alves OL, DeSouza G, Esposito E (2005) Mechanistic aspects of biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by several Fusarium oxysporum strains. J Nanobiotechnol 3:1–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Maliszewska I, Juraszek A, Bielska K (2014) Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using ascomycota fungi Penicillium nalgiovense AJ12. J Clust Sci 25:989–1004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Vágó A, Szakacs G, Sáfrán G, Horvath R, Pécz B, Lagzi I (2016) One-step green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by mesophilic filamentous fungi. Chem Phys Lett 645:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitching M, Ramani M, Marsili E (2015) Fungal biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles: mechanism and scale up. Microb Biotechnol 8:904–917View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Taherzadeh MJ, Fox M, Hjorth H, Edebo L (2003) Production of mycelium biomass and ethanol from paper pulp sulfite liquor by Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour Technol 88:167–177View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pantidos N, Horsfall LE (2014) Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles by bacteria, fungi and plants. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 5:5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mondal A, Basu R, Das S, Nandy P (2011) Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: an agricultural prospect. J Nanopart Res 13:4519–4528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Alam MN, Roy N, Mandal D, Begum NA (2013) Green chemistry for nanochemistry: exploring medicinal plants for the biogenic synthesis of metal NPs with fine-tuned properties. RSC Adv 3:11935–11956View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Park YK, Park YH, Hwang CY, Kim YK, Lee YS, Jeong DH, Cho MH (2007) Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotechno Biol Med 3:95–101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sperling RA, Rivera Gil P, Zhang F, Zanella M, Parak WJ (2008) Biological applications of gold nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 37:1896–1908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jelveh S, Chithrani DB (2011) Gold nanostructures as a platform for combinational therapy in future cancer therapeutics. Cancers 3:1081–1110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarkar J, Ray S, Chattopadhyay D, Laskar A, Acharya K (2012) Mycogenesis of gold nanoparticles using a phytopathogen Alternaria alternata. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:637–643View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Verma VC, Singh SK, Solanki R, Prakash S (2011) Biofabrication of anisotropic gold nanotriangles using extract of endophytic Aspergillus clavatus as a dual functional reductant and stabilizer. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:16–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Vigneshwaran N, Ashtaputre NM, Varadarajan PV, Nachane RP, Paralikar KM, Balasubramanya RH (2007) Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Aspergillus flavus. Mater Lett 61:1413–1418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agirc Res 2:48–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhainsa KC, D’Souza SF (2006) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 47:160–164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bhambure R, Bule M, Shaligram N, Kamat M, Singhal R (2009) Extracellular biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Aspergillus niger—its characterisation and stability. Chem Eng Technol 32:1036–1041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Xie J, Lee JY, Wang DIC, Ting YP (2007) High-yield synthesis of complex gold nanostructures in a fungal system. J Phys Chem C 111:16858–16865View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Raliya R (2013) Rapid, low-cost, and ecofriendly approach her for iron nanoparticle synthesis using Aspergillus oryzae TFR9. J Nanopart 141274:4Google Scholar
  33. Binupriya AR, Sathishkumar M, Vijayaraghavan K, Yun SI (2010) Bioreduction of trivalent aurum to nanocrystalline gold particles by active and inactive cells and cell free extract of Aspergillus oryzae var. viridis. J Hazard Mater 177:539–545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Vala AK (2015) Exploration on green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by a marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sydowii. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 34:194–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li G, He D, Qian Y, Guan B, Gao S, Cui Y, Yokoyama K, Wang L (2012) Fungus-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus terreus. Int J Mol Sci 13:466–476View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarafdar JC, Raliya R, Rathore I (2012) Microbial synthesis of phosphorous nanoparticle from tri-calcium phosphate using Aspergillus tubingensis TFR-5. J Bionanosci 6:84–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang X, He X, Wang K, Yang X (2011) Different active biomolecules involved in biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by three fungus species. J Biomed Nanotechnol 7:245–254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ahmad T, Wani IA, Manzoor N, Ahmed J, Asiri AM (2013) Biosynthesis, structural characterization and antimicrobial activity of gold and silver nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 107:227–234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Chauhan A, Zubair S, Tufail S, Sherwani A, Sajid M, Raman SC, Azam A, Owais M (2011) Fungus-mediated biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles: potential in detection of liver cancer. Int J Nanomedicine 6:2305–2319Google Scholar
  40. Dameron CT, Reese RN, Mehra RK, Kortan AR, Carroll PJ, Steigerwald ML, Brus LE, Winge DR (1989) Biosynthesis of cadmium sulphide quantum semiconductor crystallites. Nature 338:596–597View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Krumov N, Oder S, Perner Nochta I, Angelov A, Posten C (2007) Accumulation of CdS nanoparticles by yeasts in a fed-batch bioprocess. J Biotechnol 132:481–486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Balaji DS, Basavaraja S, Deshpande R, Mahesh DB, Prabhakar BK, Venkataraman A (2009) Extracellular biosynthesis of functionalized silver nanoparticles by strains of Cladosporium cladosporioides fungus. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 68:88–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Shankar SS, Ahmad A, Pasricha R, Sastry M (2003) Bioreduction of chloroaurate ions by geranium leaves and its endophytic fungus yields gold nanoparticles of different shapes. J Mater Chem 13:1822–1826View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanghi R, Verma P (2010) pH dependant fungal proteins in the “green” synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Adv Mater Lett 1:193–199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanghi R, Verma P (2009) Biomimetic synthesis and characterisation of protein capped silver nanoparticles. Bioresour Technol 100:501–504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2013) Mycocrystallization of gold ions by the fungus Cylindrocladium floridanum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:2207–2211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2011) Synthesis and characterization of nano-gold composite using Cylindrocladium floridanum and its heterogeneous catalysis in the degradation of 4-nitrophenol. J Hazard Mat 189:519–525View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Sheikhloo Z, Salouti M, Katiraee F (2011) Biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles by fungus Epicoccum nigrum. J Clust Sci 22:661–665View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Govender Y, Riddin T, Gericke M, Whiteley CG (2009) Bioreduction of platinum salts into nanoparticles: a mechanistic perspective. Biotechnol Lett 31:95–100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A (2009) Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv 27:76–83View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Senapat S, Mandal D, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M (2003) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 28:313–318View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Ahmed A, Senapati S, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M (2003) Extracellular biosynthesis of monodisperse gold nanoparticles by a novel extremophilic actinomycete, Thermomonospora sp. Langmuir 19:3550–3553View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Mandal D, Bolander ME, Mukhopadhyay D, Sarkar G, Mukherjee P (2006) The use of microorganisms for the formation of metal nanoparticles and their application. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:485–492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Mukherjee P, Senapati S, Mandal D, Ahmad A, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M (2002) Extracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Chembiochem 3:461–463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sanyal A, Rautaray D, Bansal V, Ahmad A, Sastry M (2005) Heavy-metal remediation by a fungus as a means of production of lead and cadmium carbonate crystals. Langmuir 21:7220–7224View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Rautaray D, Sanyal A, Adyanthaya SD, Ahmad A, Sastry M (2004) Biological synthesis of strontium carbonate crystals using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Langmuir 20:6827–6833View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Senapat S, Mandal D, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M (2003) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 28:313–318View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Mandal D, Senapati S, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M (2002) Enzymemediated extracellular synthesis of CdS nanoparticles by the fungus, Fusarium oxysporum. J Am Chem Soc 124:12108–12109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Bansal V, Rautaray D, Bharde A, Ahire K, Sanyal A, Ahmad A, Sastry M (2005) Fungus-mediated biosynthesis of silica and titania particles. J Mater Chem 15:2583–2589View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Bansal V, Poddar P, Ahmad A, Sastry M (2006) Room-temperature biosynthesis of ferroelectric barium titanate nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 128:11958–11963View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Bansal V, Rautaray D, Ahmad A, Sastry M (2004) Biosynthesis of zirconia nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. J Mater Chem 14:3303–3305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Sawle BD, Salimath B, Deshpande R, Bedre MD, Prabhakar BK, Venkataraman A (2008) Biosynthesis and stabilization of Au and Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles by fungus, Fusarium semitectum. Sci Tech Adv Mater 9:1–6Google Scholar
  63. SathishKumar K, Amutha R, Arumugam P, Berchmans S (2011) Synthesis of gold nanoparticles: an ecofriendly approach using Hansenula anomala. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1418–1425View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Kumar SK, Peter YA, Nadeau JL (2008) Facile biosynthesis, separation and conjugation of gold nanoparticles to doxorubicin. Nanotechnology 19:495101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Mishra AN, Bhadaurla S, Singh Gaur M, Pasricha R (2010) Extracellular microbial synthesis of gold nanoparticles using fungus Hormoconis resinae. JOM 62:45–48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Castro Longoria E, Vilchis Nestor AR, Avalos Borja M (2011) Biosynthesis of silver, gold and bimetallic nanoparticles using the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 83:42–48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Shahverdi AR, Minaeian S, Shahverdi HR, Jamalifar H, Nohi AA (2007) Rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using culture supernatants of enterobacteria: a novel biological approach. Process Biochem 42:919–923View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Ma Y, Li N, Yang C, Yang X (2005) One-step synthesis of amino-dextran protected gold and silver nanoparticles and its application in biosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:1044–1048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Mishra A, Tripathy SK, Wahab R, Jeong SH, Hwang I, Yang YB, Kim YS, Shin HS, Yun SII (2011) Microbial synthesis of gold nanoparticles using the fungus Penicillium brevicompactum and their cytotoxic effects against mouse mayo blast cancer C2C12 cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:617–630View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Kathiresan K, Manivannan S, Nabeel M, Dhivya B (2009) Studies on silver nanoparticles synthesized by a marine fungus, Penicillium fellutanum isolated from coastal mangrove sediment. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 71:133–137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Mishra A, Tripathy SK, Yuna SI (2012b) Fungus mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their conjugation with genomic DNA isolated from Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Process Biochem 47:701–711Google Scholar
  72. Du L, Xian L, Feng JX (2011) Rapid extra-/intracellular biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by the fungus Penicillium sp. J Nanopart Res 13:921–930View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Sanghi R, Verma P, Puri S (2011) Enzymatic formation of gold nanoparticles using Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Adv Chem Eng Sci 1:154–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Birla SS, Tiwari VV, Gade AK, Ingle AP, Yadav AP, Rai MK (2009) Fabrication of silver nanoparticles by Phoma glomerata and its combined effect against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:173–179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Vigneshwaran N, Kathe A (2007) Silver-protein (core-shell) nanoparticle production using spent mushroom substrate. Langmuir 23:7113–7117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Das SK, Dickinson C, Laffir F, Brougham DF, Marsili E (2012) Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles biosynthesized with Rhizopus oryzae protein extract. Green Chem 14:1322–1344View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Sen K, Sinha P, Lahiri S (2011) Time dependent formation of gold nanoparticles in yeast cells: a comparative study. Biochem Eng J 55:1–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Kowshik M, Deshmukh N, Vogel W, Urban J, Kulkarni SK, Paknikar KM (2002) Microbial synthesis of semiconductor CdS nanoparticles, their characterization, and their use in the fabrication of an ideal diode. Biotechnol Bioeng 78:583–588View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Krumov N, Oder S, Perner Nochta I, Angelov A, Posten C (2007) Accumulation of CdS nanoparticles by yeasts in a fed-batch bioprocess. J Biotechnol 132:481–486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2011) Facile green synthesis of gold nanostructures by NADPH-dependent enzyme from the extract of Sclerotium rolfsii. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 380:156–161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Mukherjee P, Roy M, Mandal BP, Dey GK, Mukherjee PK, Ghatak J, Tyagi AK, Kale SP (2008) Green synthesis of highly stabilized nanocrystalline silver particles by a non-pathogenic and agriculturally important fungus T. asperellum. Nanotechnol 19:1–7Google Scholar
  82. Maliszewska I, Aniszkiewicz Ł, Sadowski Z (2009) Biological synthesis of gold nanostructures using the extract of Trichoderma koningii. Acta Phys Polon A 116:163–165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Maliszewska I (2013) Microbial mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity studies. Dig J Nanomater Bios 8:1123–1131Google Scholar
  84. Vahabi K, Mansoori GA, Karimi S (2011) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by fungus Trichoderma reesei (a route for large-scale production of AgNPs). Insci J 1:65–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Fayaz M, Tiwary CS, Kalaichelvan PT, Venkatesan R (2010) Blue orange light emission from biogenic synthesized silver nanoparticles using Trichoderma viride. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 75:175–178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Ramanathan R, Field MR, O’Mullane AP, Smooker PM, Bhargava SK, Bansal V (2013) Aqueous phase synthesis of copper nanoparticles: a link between heavy metal resistance and nanoparticle synthesis ability in bacterial systems. Nanoscale 5:2300–2306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Mukherjee P, Ahmad A, Mandal D, Senapati S, Sainkar SR, Khan MI, Ramani R, Parischa R, Ajaykumar PV, Alam M, Sastry M, Kumar R (2001) Bioreduction of AuCl4-ions by the fungus, Verticillium sp. and surface trapping of the gold nanoparticles formed. Angew Chem Int Edu 40:3585–3588View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Philip D (2009) Biosynthesis of Au, Ag and Au-Ag nanoparticles using edible mushroom extract. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 73:374–381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Agnihotri M, Joshi S, Ravikumar A, Zinjarde S, Kulkarni S (2009) Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by the tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589. Mater Lett 63:1231–1234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Pimprikar PS, Joshi SS, Kumar AR, Zinjarde SS, Kulkarni SK (2009) Influence of biomass and gold salt concentration on nanoparticle synthesis by the tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 74:309–316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Lloyd JR (2003) Microbial reduction of metals and radionuclides. FEMS Microbial Rev 27:411–425View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Medentsev AG, Alimenko VK (1998) Naphthoquinone metabolites of the fungi. Photochemistry 47:935–959View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Baker RA, Tatum JH (1998) Novel anthraquinones from stationary cultures of Fusarium oxysporum. J Ferment Bioeng 85:359–361View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Durán N, Teixeira MFS, De Conti R, Esposito E (2002) Ecological-friendly pigments from fungi. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42:53–66View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Bell AA, Wheeler MH, Liu J, Stipanovic RD, Puckhaber LS, Orta H (2003) United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service studies on polyketide toxins of Fusarium oxysporum f sp Vasinfectum: potential targets for disease control. Pest Manag Sci 59:736–747View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Chen JC, Lin ZH, Ma XX (2003) Evidence of the production of silver nanoparticles via pretreatment of Phoma sp.3.2883 with silver nitrate. Lett Appl Microbiol 37:105–108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Jebali A, Ramezani F, Kazemi B (2011) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by Geotricum sp. J Clus Sci 22:225–232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Yong P, Rowson AN, Farr JPG, Harris IR, Mcaskie LE (2002) Bioaccumulation of palladium by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 55:593–601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Kowshik M, Ashtaputre S, Kulkani SK, Parknikar KMM (2003) Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by a silver-tolerant yeast strain MKY3. Nanotechnology 14:95–100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Subramanian M, Alikunhi MN, Kathiresan K (2010) In vitro synthesis of silver nanoparticles by marine yeasts from coastal mangrove sediment. Adv Sci Lett 3:428–433View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Jain N, Bhargava A, Majumdar S, Tarafdar JC, Panwar J (2011) Extracellular biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus flavus NJP08: a mechanism perspective. Nanoscale 3:635–641View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Vigneshwaran N, Ashtaputre NM, Varadarajan PV, Nachane RP, Paralikar KM, Balasubramanya RH (2007) Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Aspergillus flavus. Mat Lett 61:1413–1418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Senapati S, Mandal D, Ahmad A (2004) Fungus mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a novel biological approach. Ind J Phys A 78A:101–105Google Scholar
  104. Gericke M, Pinches A (2006) Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles. Hydrometallurgy 83:132–140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Sneha K, Sathishkumar M, Mao J, Kwak IS, Yun YS (2010) Corynebacterium glutamicum-mediated crystallization of silver ions through sorption and reduction processes. Chem Eng J 162:989–996View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Mukherjee P, Ahmad A, Mandal D, Senapati S, Sainkar SR, Khan MI, Parischa R, Ajaykumar PV, Alam M, Kumar R, Sastry M (2001) Fungus mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their immobilization in the mycelial matrix: a novel biological approach to nanoparticle synthesis. Nano Lett 1:515–519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Daniel MC, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104:293–346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany AM, Goldsmith EC, Baxter SC (2008) Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res 48:1721–1730View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Andreescu D, Kumar Sau K, Goia DV (2006) Stabilizer-free nanosized gold sols. J Coll Interface Sci 298:742–751View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Pimpang P, Choopun S (2011) Monodispersity and stability of gold nanoparticles stabilized by using polyvinyl alcohol. Chiang Mai J Sci 38:31–38Google Scholar
  111. Sanghi R, Verma P, Puri S (2011) Enzymatic formation of gold nanoparticles using Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Adv Chem Eng Sci 1:154–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Gupta S, Bector S (2013) Biosynthesis of extracellular and intracellular gold nanoparticles by Aspergillus fumigatus and A. flavus. Anton Leeuw 103:1113–1123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Das SK, Liang J, Schmidt M, Laffir F, Marsili E (2012) Biomineralization mechanism of gold by zygomycete fungi Rhizopous oryzae. ACS Nano 6:6165–6173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Lim HA, Mishra A, Yun SI (2011) Effect of pH on the extra cellular synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles by Saccharomyces cerevisae. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:518–522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Mishra A, Tripathy S, Yun SI (2011) Bio-synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles from Candida guilliermondii and their antimicrobial effect against pathogenic bacteria. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 1:243–248View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Soni N, Prakash S (2012) Synthesis of gold nanoparticles by the fungus Aspergillus niger and its efficacy against mosquito larvae. Rep Parasitolo 2:1–7Google Scholar
  117. Castro Longoria E, Moreno Velázquez SD, Vilchis Nestor AR, Arenas Berumen E, Avalos Borja M (2012) Production of platinum nanoparticles and nanoaggregates using Neurospora crassa. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1000–1004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Bharde A, Rautaray D, Bansal V, Ahmad A, Sarkar I, Yusuf SM, Sanyal M, Sastry M (2006) Extracellular biosynthesis of magnetite using fungi. Small 2:135–141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Zare B, Babaie S, Setayesh N, Shahverdi AR (2013) Isolation and characterization of a fungus for extracellular synthesis of small selenium nanoparticles. Nanomed J 1:13–19Google Scholar
  120. Dameron CT, Reese RN, Mehra RK, Kortan AR, Carroll PJ, Steigerwald ML, Winge BLE, Winge DR (1989) Biosynthesis of cadmium sulphide quantum semiconductor crystallites. Nature 338:596–597View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  122. Fernandez RG, Prats E, Jorrin Novo JV (2010) Proteomics of plant pathogenic fungi. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010:932527Google Scholar
  123. Ocsoy I, Paret ML, Ocsoy MA, Kunwar S, Chen T, You M, Tan W (2013) Nanotechnology in plant disease management: DNA-directed silver nanoparticles on graphene oxide as an antibacterial against Xanthomonas perforans. ACS Nano 7:8972–8980View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Chambers VW, Proctor CM, Kabler PW (1962) Bactericidal effects of low concentrations of silver. J Am Water Works Assoc 54:208–216Google Scholar
  125. Kim JH (2004) Nano silver chemotherapeutic agents and its applications. News Inf Chem Eng 22:655–660Google Scholar
  126. Jo YK, Kim BH, Jung G (2009) Antifungal activity of silver ions and nanoparticles on phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Dis 93:1037–1043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Davies RL, Etris SF (1997) The development and functions of silver in water purification and disease control. Catal Today 36:107–114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Kim SW, Jung JH, Lamsal K, Kim YS, Min JS, Lee YS (2012) Antifungal effects of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against various plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology 40:53–58View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Min JS, Kim KS, Kim SW, Jung JH, Lamsal K, Kim SB, Jung M, Lee YS (2009) Effects of colloidal silver nanoparticles on sclerotium-forming phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol J 25:376–380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Kim H, Kang H, Chu G, Byun G (2008) Antifungal effectiveness of nanosilver colloid against rose powdery mildew in greenhouses. Solid State Phenom 135:15–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Aguilar-Méndez AM, Martín-martínez ES, Ortega-Arroyo L, Cobián-Portillo G, Sánchez-Espíndola E (2010) Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles: effect on phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloesporioides. J Nanopart Res 13:2525–2532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Das SK, Das AR, Guha AK (2009) Gold nanoparticles: microbial synthesis and application in water hygiene management. Langmuir 25:8192–8199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Salata OV (2004) Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnol 2:3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Yadav A, Kon K, Kratosova G, Duran N, Ingle AP, Rai M (2015) Fungi as an efficient mycosystem for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles: progress and key aspects of research. Biotechnol Lett 37:2099–2120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Khan MM, Kalathil S, Han TH, Lee J, Cho MH (2013) Positively charged gold nanoparticles synthesized by electrochemically active biofilm—a biogenic approach. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13:6079–6085View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Gajbhiye MB, Kesharwani JG, Ingle AP, Gade AK, Rai MK (2009) Fungus mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its activity against pathogenic fungi in combination of fluconazole. Nanomedicine 5:382–386View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Saravanan M, Nanda A (2010) Extracellular synthesis of silver bionanoparticles from Aspergillus clavatus and its antimicrobial activity against MRSA and MRSE. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 77:214–218View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Gade AK, Bonde P, Ingle AP, Marcato PD, Duran N, Rai MK (2008) Exploitation of Aspergillus niger for synthesis of silver nanoparticles. J Biobased Mater Bioener 2:243–247View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Sundaramoorthi C, Kalaivani M, Mathews DM, Palanisamy S, Kalaiselvan V, Rajasekaran A (2009) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Aspergillus niger and evaluation of its wound healing activity in experimental rat model. Int J Pharm Tech Res 1:1523–1529Google Scholar
  140. Ingle A, Gade A, Pierrat S, Sönnichsen C, Rai M (2008) Mycosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium acuminatum and its activity against some human pathogenic bacteria. Curr Nanosci 4:141–144View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Durán N, Marcato PD, De S, Gabriel IH, Alves OL, Esposito E (2007) Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles produced by fungal process on textile fabrics and their effluent treatment. J Biomed Nanotechnol 3:203–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. El-Rafie MH, Mohamed AA, Shaheen THI, Hebeish A (2010) Antimicrobial effect of silver nanoparticles produced by fungal process on cotton fabrics. Carbo Polym 80:779–782View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Namasivayam SKR, Avimanyu (2011) Silver nanoparticle synthesis from Lecanicillium lecanii and evalutionary treatment on cotton fabrics by measuring their improved antibacterial activity with antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) and E. coli (ATCC 25922) strains. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3:190–195Google Scholar
  144. Chowdhury S, Basu A, Kundu S (2014) Green synthesis of protein capped silver nanoparticles from phytopathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid with antimicrobial properties against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nano Res Lett 9:365View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Du L, Xu Q, Huang M, Xian L, Feng JX (2015) Synthesis of small silver nanoparticles under light radiation by fungus Penicillium oxalicum and its application for the catalytic reduction of methylene blue. Mat Chem Phy 160:40–47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Singh D, Rathod V, Ninganagouda S, Hiremath J, Singh AK, Mathew J (2014) Optimization and characterization of silver nanoparticle by endophytic fungi Penicillium sp. isolated from Curcuma longa (Turmeric) and application studies against MDR E. coli and S. aureus. Bioinorg Chem App 408021:8Google Scholar
  147. Thirumurugan G, Shaheedha SM, Dhanaraju MD (2009) In vitro evaluation of anti-bacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesised by using Phytophthora infestans. Int J Chem Tech R 1:714–716Google Scholar
  148. Devika R, Elumalai S, Manikandan E, Eswaramoorthy D (2012) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus and their antibacterial activity. Open Access Sci Rep 1:557Google Scholar
  149. Kim SW, Kim KS, Lamsal K, Kim YJ, Kim SB, Jung M, Sim SJ, Kim HS, Chang SJ, Kim JK, Lee YS (2009) An in vitro study of the antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on oak wilt pathogen Raffaelea sp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:760–764Google Scholar
  150. Ray S, Sarkar S, Kundu S (2011) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the mycorrhizal mushroom Tricholoma crassum (BERK.) Sacc.: its antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria and fungus, including multidrug resistant plant and human bacteria. Dig J Nanomater Bios 6:1299Google Scholar
  151. Fayaz AM, Balaji K, Girilal M, Kalaichelvan PT, Venkatesan R (2009) Mycobased synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their incorporation into sodium alginate films for vegetable and fruit preservation. J Agric Food Chem 57:6246–6252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Bhargava A, Jain N, Gangopadhyay S, Panwar J (2015) Development of gold nanoparticle-fungal hybrid based heterogeneous interface for catalytic applications. Pro Biochem 50:1293–1300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Kumar SA, Abyaneh MK, Gosavi SW, Kulkarni SK, Pasricha R, Ahmad A, Khan MI (2007) Nitrate reductase-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles from AgNO3. Biotechnol Lett 29:439–445View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramfrez JT, Yacaman MJ (2005) The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16:2346–2353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Raheman F, Deshmukh S, Ingle A, Gade A, Rai M (2011) Silver nanoparticles: novel antimicrobial agent synthesized from an endophytic fungus Pestalotia sp. isolated from leaves of Syzygium cumini (L). Nano Biomed Eng 3:174–178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Spasova M, Manolova N, Naydenov M, Kuzmanova J (2011) Electrospun biohybrid materials for plant biocontrol containing chitosan and Trichoderma viride spores. J Bioact Compat Polym 26:48–55View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Shao L, Gao Y, Feng Y (2011) Semiconductor quantum dots for biomedical applications. Sensors 11:11736–11751View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Kumar AS, Ansary AA, Ahmad A, Khan MI (2007) Extracellular biosynthesis of CdSe quantum dots by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. J Biomed Nanotechnol 3:190–194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Bakar NA, Salleh MM, Umar AA, Yahaya M (2011) The detection of pesticides in water using ZnCdSe quantum dot films. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:025011View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Siddiqi and Husen. 2016

Advertisement