Open Access

Self-Catalyzed Growth and Characterization of In(As)P Nanowires on InP(111)B Using Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition

Nanoscale Research Letters201611:208

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1427-4

Received: 28 January 2016

Accepted: 13 April 2016

Published: 19 April 2016

Abstract

We report the growth of vertical <111>-oriented InAs x P1−x (0.11 ≤ x ≤ 0.27) nanowires via metal-organic chemical vapor deposition in the presence of indium droplets as catalysts on InP(111)B substrates at 375 °C. Trimethylindium, tertiarybutylphosphine, and tertiarybutylarsine are used as the precursors, corresponding to P/In and As/In molar ratios of 29 and 0.01, respectively. The as-grown nanowire growth morphologies, crystallinity, composition, and optical characteristics are determined using a combination of scanning and transmission electron microscopies, electron diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron, energy dispersive X-ray, and Raman spectroscopies. We find that the InAs x P1−x nanowires are tapered with narrow tops, wider bases, and In-rich In-As alloy tips, characteristic of vapor-liquid-solid process. The wires exhibit a mixture of zinc blende and wurtzite crystal structures and a high density of structural defects such as stacking faults and twins. Our results suggest that the incorporation of As into InP wires decreases with increasing substrate temperature. The Raman spectra obtained from the In(As)P nanowires reveal a red-shift and lower intensity of longitudinal optical mode relative to both InP nanowires and InP(111)B bulk, due to the incorporation of As into the InP matrix.

Keywords

Self-catalystIn(As,P) nanowiresVapor-liquid-solid processMetal-organic chemical vapor depositionRaman spectroscopyScanning transmission electron microscopyX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Background

One-dimensional semiconducting nanowires have attracted considerable attention for potential applications in electronics, optoelectronics, and chemical and biological sensing devices [14]. Over the past two decades, considerable efforts have been devoted to the synthesis of elemental (group IV [5, 6]), binary compound (groups III–V [7, 8], groups II–VI [9, 10]), and metal oxide nanowires [11]. The growth of compound nanowires is desirable for high-frequency electronics and optoelectronics, such as light-emitting devices operating at high frequency [12, 13], high electron drift velocity devices [14], and photodiodes [15, 16] due to their low energy band gaps and very high electron mobility. In typical vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth [17] of groups III–V nanowires, gold is the most commonly used catalyst material but is undesirable because gold forms deep level traps [18]. To overcome this problem, previous studies have shown that nanowires of groups III–V binary compounds can been grown via VLS process using group III metal as the catalyst [1925]. However, relatively few studies have reported catalyst-free growth of ternary compound nanowires [2629].

In this letter, we report the self-catalyzed growth of In(As)P alloy nanowires on InP(111) substrate by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Using liquid indium as the catalyst, we optimized the growth conditions to obtain vertically oriented In(As)P nanowires on InP(111)B substrate. The morphology and crystallinity of In(As)P nanowires are examined using scanning- and transmission- electron microscopies (SEM and TEM). The composition and optical properties of as-grown nanowires are determined using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the TEM, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and micro-Raman spectroscopy.

Methods

All of our nanowire growth experiments are carried out in a Veeco D125 MOCVD reactor using trimethylindium (TMIn), tertiarybutylarsine (TBA), and tertiarybutylphosphine (TBP) as indium (In), arsine (As), and phosphine (P) precursors, respectively. Details of the MOCVD system and the experimental procedure used to grow nanowires can be found in refs. [21, 3032]. Briefly, single-crystalline InP(111)B wafers (0.5° miscut and 5 × 106 Ω-cm resistivity) are used as substrates. The samples are first placed in the reactor and annealed at 550 °C in 2.6 × 10−3 mol/s of H2 for 360 s. The H2 flow is then switched off, and TBP was introduced for 900 s at 7.4 × 10−6 mol/s. After annealing, the temperature was lowered to 375 °C. Liquid indium droplets are deposited at 375 °C by feeding 8.4 × 10−7 mol/s of TMIn for 12 s. In(As)P nanowires are grown by feeding TMIn, TBP, and TBA into the reactor at the flow rates of 5.0 × 10−5 mol/s, 7.4 × 10−6 mol/s, and 8.3 × 10−8 mol/s, respectively. These flow rates correspond to P/In and As/In molar ratios of 29 and 0.01, respectively. The total pressure is always kept constant at 60 Torr during the entire growth process. The growth is terminated after 300 s by switching off the precursors and cooling the samples to room temperature at ~0.65 °C/s by flowing H2 for 540 s. Note that the absolute temperatures in our MOCVD reactor are accurate to within 25 K, and the substrate temperature is found to decrease monotonically from the center to the edge of the substrate by ~40 K [30]. All of the results presented here, except those in Figs. 2a and 3a, were obtained from the nanowires extracted from the center of the substrate, where the temperature is ~375 °C.

Morphologies of the as-grown samples are determined using FEI Nova 600 field emission SEM operated at 10 kV accelerating voltage. Individual nanostructures, which are mechanically exfoliated from the growth wafer and transferred into Cu TEM grid, are further characterized using TEM, scanning TEM (STEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and EDS (Oxford Instruments) in an FEI Titan STEM operated at 300 kV. The SEM and TEM images are processed using ImageJ [33], TEM Imaging and Analysis (TIA), and Digital Micrograph as a means to measure the sizes and shapes of the nanowires. Crystal structure and crystallinity of the nanowires are determined from the TEM and SAED data. Nanowire composition is obtained using EDS point and/or line scans acquired from more than ten nanowires and XPS (Omicron XPS/UPS system) survey scans and core-level spectroscopy. The XPS measurements are performed on mechanically exfoliated In(As)P nanowires transferred onto 200-nm-thick Au coated Si(111) substrate using Al Kα (1486.6 eV) as the excitation source with normal (90°) incidence of the beam with respect to substrate surface. The expected resolution in our XPS measurements is <1 at.%. The Au 4f7/2 (84.1 eV) [34] and the adventitious C 1s (284.5 eV) [35] peak positions are used as the references to correct for any charging induced shifts in the XPS data. Core-level spectroscopic data were deconvoluted [36] using a mixture of Gaussian and Lorentzian curves after Shirley background subtraction [34]. From the fitted curves and accounting for the atomic sensitivity factors, elemental compositions within the nanowires are determined [37, 38]. Raman spectroscopic measurements are performed using an optical fiber-coupled Raman microscope system (Jovin Yvon-Horiba LabRam HR-800) on an Olympus BX41 optical microscope. The Raman detector is equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooling system and a motorized stage. Raman signals are obtained in a backscattering configuration using He-Cd laser (325 nm) and ×100 ultraviolet objective lens. The laser spot size is approximately 1 μm. The nominal resolution of the measured spectra is within <0.5 cm−1. Substrate-heating-induced spectral shift was excluded by keeping the excitation power (on the substrate) below 0.5 mW. The Raman system was calibrated using a reference Si(111) substrate. Ensembles of mechanically exfoliated InP or In(As)P nanowires on InP(111)B substrate are used to identify the incorporation of As into InP matrix. Least squares minimization model with the Voigt profile was employed to fit the obtained spectra from semiconducting materials InP and In(As)P [39].

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a is a typical SEM image acquired from an InP(111)B sample after In deposition at 375 °C. The image shows a distribution of dome-shaped In mounds with an average size of 61 ± 14 nm and an areal density of (2 ± 0.2) × 109 cm−2. At 375 °C, we expect that the as-deposited In forms liquid droplets, which solidify upon cooling, to yield the observed shapes. Figure 1b shows In(As)P nanowires grown on InP(111)B substrate. The nanowires exhibit hexagonal cross-sectional shapes (see Fig. 1c) and are tapered with tip and base diameters of 9 ± 3 nm and 42 ± 14 nm, respectively. The average length of nanowires is found to be 579 ± 15 nm, which corresponds to a vertical growth rate of 2.4 ± 0.2 nm/s. The uncertainties in the nanowire diameters and lengths are determined from the corresponding measurements over 50 different nanowires. The areal density of nanowires is ~(2.5 ± 0.2) × 109 cm−2, nearly the same as that of the In droplets. That is, each of the In droplets gives rise to one nanowire. However, the base diameters of the nanowires are consistently lower than that of the In droplets situated on the substrate prior to nanowire growth; this is expected and is due to a change in the contact angle between the liquid droplet and solid surface underneath that occurs during growth [40, 41]. These observations are consistent with our expectation that In droplets act as catalysts for the growth of nanowires via VLS process [17]. All of the above results are similar to those reported for the self-catalyzed VLS growth of InP and InPSb nanowires [21, 31, 32].
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showing (a) a 45° tilted view of In droplets deposited at 375 °C on InP(111)B by feeding 8.4 × 10−7 mol/s of TMIn for 12 s, (b) 45° tilted, and (c) top view of In(As)P nanowires on InP(111)B grown at 375 °C over 300 s by feeding TMIn, TBP, and TBA into the reactor at the flow rates of 5.0 × 10−5, 7.4 × 10−6, and 8.3 × 10−8 mol/s, respectively

Figure 2a shows a representative bright-field TEM image of a single In(As)P nanowire. (This particular nanowire is collected from the edge of InP(111)B substrate, where the substrate temperature may have been lower than at the center during deposition [30].) We see the presence of a smooth, nearly hemispherical dome-shaped feature with darker contrast at the tip of the wire. The nanowire is tapered with a diameter of 45 nm at the tip, a diameter of 70 nm at the base, and a length of 335 nm. The resulting morphology of the nanowire, grown along the substrate edges, is that it is less tapered than that in Fig. 1b. We found that the nanowires grown at the center (edge) of the substrate have higher (lower) aspect ratios with narrower (wider) bases. These observations are qualitatively similar to the previously reported morphologies of self-catalyzed InP [21] and InPSb [30] nanowires. We speculate that this observed variation in nanowire morphologies across the growth substrate is a consequence of temperature-dependent rates of migration and/or evaporation of indium away from the wire tips [21]. Figure 2b is a dark-field TEM image obtained using the (112) diffraction spot associated with tetragonal In [42], highlighted by a green circle in the SAED pattern (see Fig. 2d); under these particular imaging conditions, the wire tip appears brighter in contrast, indicative of the presence of crystalline In or In-rich alloy phase in the tip. Figure 2c is a high-resolution TEM image of an individual In(As)P nanowire showing a high density of twins and stacking faults. Figure 2d, e shows SAED patterns of the nanowires shown in Fig. 2a, c, respectively. From the SAED data, we assign the crystal structure of the nanowire in Fig. 2a, c as zinc blende with \( \left[\overline{1}12\right] \) and [011] zone axes, respectively. Additional spots are indexed as wurtzite crystal structure in \( \left[2\overline{1}\overline{1}0\right] \) zone axis, which is parallel to [011]. The streaks along [111] are indicative of the structural defects oriented perpendicular to this direction. (These results are consistent with the expectation that non-nitride groups III–V compounds crystallize in the zinc blende crystal structure [43]. Within the In(As)P alloy crystal, In atoms reside in group III sub-lattice positions while As and P atoms randomly occupy group V sub-lattice positions [43].) The lattice parameter of the wire shown in Fig. 2a as measured from the diffraction pattern in Fig. 2d is 5.94 ± 0.02 Å. Assuming that Vegard’s law [43] is valid for InP-InAs system and using the lattice constants of zinc blende structured InP (5.87 Å) [29] and InAs (6.06 Å) [44, 45], we estimate that the incorporated content of As in the InAs x P1−x nanowire is approximately x = 0.36 ± 0.10. Following a similar approach, we analyzed the SAED pattern in Fig. 2e and estimate an As content x ~ 0.27 for the nanowire shown in Fig. 2c.
Fig. 2

a Bright field, b dark field, and c Fourier-filtered high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of an In(As)P nanowire grown on InP(111)B nanowire using the same conditions as in Fig. 1. The image in b is obtained using the diffraction spot highlighted by a green circle in (d). This particular nanowire was extracted from a region on the substrate (likely at a lower temperature) that is different from the region shown in Fig. 1. d, e Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns obtained from different wires oriented to different zone axes \( \left[\overline{1}12\right] \) and \( \left[011\right] \), respectively. An additional diffraction spot seen inside the green circle in d is due to crystalline In. e SAED of the whole nanowire shown in c indexed as zinc blende in [011] zone axis. Additional spots are indexed as wurtzite crystal structure in \( \left[2\overline{1}\overline{1}0\right] \) zone axis, which is parallel to \( \left[011\right] \). The high-resolution TEM image in c was Fourier-filtered using ImageJ package to reduce the background noise

Figure 3a, b shows representative STEM images and EDS data of In(As)P nanowires and the wire tips, respectively, collected from the edge region of the substrate. (For comparison, Fig. 3c shows a representative STEM image and EDS data of In(As)P nanowires grown at the center region of the substrate.) Two-dimensional (2D) EDS maps, color coded for clarity, in Fig. 3a show spatial distributions of In, P, and As along the length of the nanowire. We find that the elemental composition, within the measurement uncertainties, is uniform throughout the wire. The average As content within the wires grown at the substrate edges is 17.4 ± 8.7 at.%, while the As content in those wires grown at the substrate center is 11.6 ± 6.4 at.%. Figure 3b shows the EDS data obtained from the wire tip, highlighted by a square in the STEM image in Fig. 3a. The spectral maps reveal the presence of P and As in addition to In inside the wire tip. However, the exact composition of the wire tip could not be determined due to the limited resolution in these measurements. Due to the limited solubility of P and As (in both liquid at the growth temperature, 375 °C, and solid at room-temperature phases of In [46], In-P [47], and In-As [48]) and the diffraction spot in Fig. 2d (enclosed by a green circle) corresponding to tetragonal-structured In (or In-rich alloy), we expect that the concentrations of P and As in the wire tip are negligible [49]. Similar results have been reported for In-catalyzed growth of InP and InPSb nanowires [31, 32]. Based on the identification of In-rich phase in the wire tip from the SAED and EDS data, we suggest that the growth of InAsP nanowires occurred via VLS process with liquid In-rich In-As alloy droplets as catalysts.
Fig. 3

a Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the same In(As)P nanowire shown in Fig. 2 and two-dimensional energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental maps obtained from the region enclosed by a white rectangle. b EDS elemental maps from the wire tip highlighted by a red square in (a). c STEM image and EDS elemental maps of In(As)P nanowire acquired from the center of the substrate

Figure 4 shows core-level X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic data obtained from the mechanically exfoliated In(As)P nanowires. The measured XPS data were least-square fitted using the Voigt profile. The core-level spectra show peaks at binding energies of 444.1 eV for In 3d5/2 [50] and 451.4 eV for In 3d3/2 [50]. The presence of P is indicated by the observation of two 2p core-level peaks, one at 128.6 eV corresponding to P from InP and the other at 129.5 eV corresponding to oxidation due to air exposure [50]. The presence of As 3d leads to a peak at 41.7 eV, corresponding to As 3d5/2 [50]. From the XPS data, taking into account the atomic sensitivity factors (0.677 for As 3d, 4.539 for In 3d5/2, and 0.486 for P 2p) [38, 50], we calculated the As content from the deconvoluted spectra to be 10.7 ± 0.8 at.%. The resulting compositions of the ensemble of nanowires are InAs0.11P0.89, which is consistent with the STEM-EDS analysis of the individual In(As)P nanowire in Fig. 3c. All of the above data clearly indicate that the incorporated contents of As into the wire increase with the decrease in the substrate temperature. The substrate-temperature-dependent variation in InAs x P1−x nanowire composition could arise due to differences in the rates of P and As atom incorporation into the nanowire, high surface diffusivity of As adatoms toward InP substrate [51], or surface migration of In catalyst from the wire tip at higher substrate temperatures (~375 °C) [52]. Our observation is consistent with the previous studies of InAsP [53] and GaAsP [54] systems.
Fig. 4

X-ray core-level spectra of single In(As)P nanowire. a As 3d. b P 2p. c In 3d. The red curves are the least squares fits to the data obtained using a mixture of Gaussian and Lorentzian curves after Shirley background subtraction

Figure 5 shows the Raman spectrum obtained from In(As)P nanowires. The result is compared with Raman spectra of InP(111)B bulk wafer and InP nanowires (see Additional file 1: Figure S1) grown on InP(111)B substrate using In as the catalysts. Two peaks marked with the dashed lines are clearly visible that correspond to transverse optical (TO) and longitudinal optical (LO) phonons. For InP (111)B wafer, the TO and LO peaks are observed at 302.2 and 341.7 cm−1, respectively. For In(As)P nanowire, the TO and LO peaks are located at 300.5 and 340 cm−1, respectively. The intensities of both LO and TO peaks in the In(As)P nanowire sample (or InP nanowire) are higher than those in the InP(111)B wafer due to the selection rule and crystal anisotropy of low dimensional nanostructures [55]. (Both LO and TO are observed from ZB (111) surface but TO is only observed from ZB (110) surface.) However, the intensity of LO phonons in In(As)P nanowires is lower than that in InP nanowires. We attribute this result to larger atomic radius of arsenic compared to phosphorus and the expansion of lattice of In(As)P [29]. Moreover, the TO and LO peaks of In(As)P nanowires are relatively red-shifted toward the lower wave numbers by 1.5 and 2.8 cm−1, respectively, with the respect to InP nanowire. The observations in the reduction of LO peak intensity and the red-shift in In(As)P nanowires are attributed to the incorporation of more localized carriers (arsenic) in InP matrix and increased free carrier concentrations which lowers the width of the surface depletion layer in the nanowire [28, 56].
Fig. 5

Raman spectra obtained from a InP(111)B wafer, b InP nanowires on InP(111)B wafer, and (c) In(As)P nanowires on InP(111)B wafer. The red and blue curves correspond to the least squares fits to the entire spectra and to the deconvoluted phonon modes using the Voigt profiles, respectively. InP TO and LO peaks are indicated with the dashed lines

Conclusions

We demonstrate the growth of vertical In-catalyzed In(As)P nanowires on InP(111)B substrate using metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. With the optimized growth parameters (the growth temperature at 375 °C, P/In molar ratio ~29 and As/In molar ratio ~0.01), we could obtain <111>-oriented InAs x P1−x (0.11 ≤ x ≤ 0.27) nanowires via self-catalyzed VLS growth process. The nanowires exhibit a mixture of zinc blende and wurtzite crystal structures with a high density of structural defects. Interestingly, we observe that the content of As into InP wires is found to decrease with increasing substrate temperature. In addition, the red-shift and weak resonance of LO mode in In(As)P nanowires further support the incorporation of As into InP matrix. We expect that our experimental results could help engineer the physical properties of groups III–V nanowires.

Abbreviations

As: 

arsine

EDS: 

energy-dispersive spectroscopy

In: 

indium

LO: 

longitudinal optical phonon

MOCVD: 

metal-organic chemical vapor deposition

P: 

phosphine

SAED: 

selective area diffraction pattern

SEM: 

scanning electron microscope

STEM: 

scanning transmission electron microscope

TBA: 

tertiarybutylarsine

TBP: 

tertiarybutylphosphine

TEM: 

transmission electron microscope

TMIn: 

trimethylindium

TO: 

transverse optical phonon

XPS: 

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Robert F. Hicks (UCLA) for providing access to the MOCVD reactor and Prof. Suneel Kodambaka (UCLA) for supporting part of the research through NSF CMMI grant #0926412. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Robyn Woo for valuable discussions regarding the synthesis and Prof. Yang Yang (UCLA) for providing access to XPS/UPS and micro-Raman spectroscopy systems. CHC acknowledges the financial support from Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. NRF-2014R1A1A2059181).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Los Angeles
(2)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanbat National University
(3)
Present address: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

References

  1. Cui Y, Wei QQ, Park HK, Lieber CM (2001) Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 293:1289–1292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnson JC, Choi HJ, Knutsen KP, Schaller RD, Yang P, Saykally RJ (2002) Single gallium nitride nanowire lasers. Nat Mater 1:106–110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Duan XF, Huan Y, Cui Y, Wang JF, Lieber CM (2001) Indium phosphide nanowires as building blocks for nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices. Nature 409:66–69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang JF, Gudiksem MS, Duan XF, Cui Y, Lieber CM (2001) Highly polarized photoluminescence and photodetection from single indium phosphide nanowires. Science 293:1455–1457View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kodambaka S, Tersoff J, Reuter MC, Ross FM (2006) Diameter-independent kinetics in the vapor-liquid-solid growth of Si nanowires. Phys Rev Lett 96:096105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kodambaka S, Tersoff J, Reuter MC, Ross FM (2007) Germanium nanowire growth below the eutectic temperature. Science 316:729–732View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Persson AI, Ohlsson BJ, Jeppese S, Samuelson L (2004) Growth mechanisms for GaAs nanowires grown in CBE. J Cryst Growth 272:167–174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Johansson J, Karlsson LS, Svensson CPT, Mårtensson T, Wacaser BA, Deppert K, Samuelson L, Seifert W (2006) Structural properties of <111>B -oriented III–V nanowires. Nat Mater 5:574–580View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang MH, Wu Y, Feick H, Tran N, Weber E, Yang P (2001) Catalytic growth of zinc oxide nanowires by vapor transport. Adv Mater 13:113–116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang ZL (2004) Zinc oxide nanostructures: growth, properties and applications. J Phys Condens Matter 16:R829–R858View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolmakov A, Moskovits M (2004) Chemical sensing and catalysis by one-dimensional metal-oxide nanostructures. Annu Rev Mater Res 34:151–180View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. David JPR, Hopkinson M, Stavrinou PN, Haywood SK (1995) Growth of InAsxP1−x / InP multi‐quantum well structures by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. J Appl Phys 78:3330–3334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sugiura H (1996) MOMBE growth of InAsP laser materials. J Cryst Growth 64:434–441View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin E, Persson AI, Samuelson L, Wernersson LE (2006) Improved subthreshold slope in an InAs nanowire heterostructure field-effect transistor. Nano Lett 6:1842–1846View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Novotny CJ, Yu ET, Yu PKL (2008) InP nanowire/polymer hybrid photodiode. Nano Lett 8:775–779View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei W, Bao XY, Soci C, Ding Y, Wang ZL, Wang D (2009) Direct heteroepitaxy of vertical InAs nanowires on Si substrates for broad band photovoltaics and photodetection. Nano Lett 9:2926–2934View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wagner RS, Ellis WC (1964) Vapor‐liquid‐solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl Phys Lett 4:89–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tavendale AJ, Pearton SJ (1983) Deep level, quenched-in defects in silicon doped with gold, silver, iron, copper or nickel. J Phys C Solid State 16:1665–1673View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandl B, Stangl J, Mårtensson T, Mikkelsen A, Eriksson J, Karlsson LS, Bauer G, Samuelson L, Seifert W (2006) Au-free epitaxial growth of InAs nanowires. Nano Lett 6:1817–1821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jabeen F, Grillo V, Rubini S, Martelli F (2008) Self-catalyzed growth of GaAs nanowires on cleaved Si by molecular beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology 19:275711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Woo RL, Gao L, Goel N, Hudait MK, Wang KL, Kodambaka S, Hicks RF (2009) Kinetic control of self-catalyzed indium phosphide nanowires, nanocones, and nanopillars. Nano Lett 9:2207–2211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li T, Gao L, Lei W, Guo L, Pan H, Yang T, Chen Y, Wang Z (2013) InAs-mediated growth of vertical InSb nanowires on Si substrates. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:333View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Novotny CJ, Yu PKL (2005) Vertically aligned, catalyst-free InP nanowires grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 87:203111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li T, Chen Y, Lei W, Zhou X, Luo S, Hu Y, Wang L, Yang T, Wang Z (2011) Effect of growth temperature on the morphology phonon properties of InAs nanowires on Si substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miao G, Zhang D (2012) Stages in the catalyst-free InP nanowire growth on silicon (100) by metal organic chemical deposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:321View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Du WN, Yang XG, Wan XY, Pan HY, Ji HM, Luo S, Yang T, Wang ZG (2014) The self-seeded growth of InAsSb nanowires on silicon by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 396:33–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Conesa-Boj S, Kriegner D, Han XL, Plissard S, Wallart X, Stangl J, Morral AFI, Caroff P (2014) Gold-free ternary III–V antimonide nanowire arrays on silicon: twin-free down to the first bilayer. Nano Lett 14:326–332View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mattila M, Hakkarainen T, Lipsanen H, Jiang H, Kauppinen EI (2006) Catalyst-free growth of In(As)P nanowires on silicon. Appl Phys Lett 89:063119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Isakov I, Panfilova M, Sourribes MJL, Tileli V, Porter AE, Warburton PA (2013) InAs1−xPx nanowires grown by catalyst-free molecular-beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology 24:085707View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou H, Pozuelo M, Hicks RF, Kodambaka S (2011) Self-catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid growth of InP1-xSbx nanostructures. J Cryst Growth 319:25–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pozuelo M, Zhou H, Lin S, Lipman SA, Goorsky MS, Hicks RF, Kodambaka S (2011) Self-catalyzed growth of InP/InSb axial nanowire heterostructures. J Cryst Growth 329:6–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ngo C, Zhou H, Mecklenburg M, Pozuelo M, Regan BC, Xiao QF, Shenoy VB, Hicks RF, Kodambaka S (2011) Effect of precursor flux on compositional evolution in InP1-xSbx nanowires grown via self-catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid process. J Cryst Growth 336:14–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shirley DA (1972) High-resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys Rev B 5:4709–4714View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Seah MP (1993) XPS reference procedure for the accurate intensity calibration of electron spectrometers. Surf Interface Anal 20:243–266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fairley N, Carrick A (2005) The Casa cookbook part 1: recipes for XPS data processing. Acolyte Science, CheshireGoogle Scholar
  37. Seah MP, Gilmore IS, Spencer SJ (2001) Quantitative XPS I. Analysis of X-ray photoelectron intensities from elemental data in a digital photoelectron database. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 120:93–111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Briggs D, Seah MP (1990) Practical surface analysis by Auger and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Wiley and Sons Ltd., ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  39. Chen J, Conache G, Gray SM, Pistol M-E, Borgström MT, Xu H, Xu HQ, Samuelson L, Håkanson U (2010) Probing strain in bent semiconductor nanowires with Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 10:1280–1286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt V, Senz S, Gösele U (2005) The shape of epitaxially grown silicon nanowires and the influence of line tension. Appl Phys A 80:445–450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kar A, Low KB, Oye M, Stroscio MA, Dutta M, Nicholls A, Meyyappan M (2011) Investigation of nucleation mechanism and tapering observed in ZnO nanowire growth by carbothermal reduction technique. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:3Google Scholar
  42. Swanson HS, Fuyat RK, Ugrinic GM (1954) Standard X-ray diffraction powder patterns. Natl Bur Stand US Circ 539:12Google Scholar
  43. Denton AR, Ashcroft NW (1991) Vegard’s law. Phys Rev A 43:3161–3164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Gao L, Woo RL, Liang B, Pozuelo M, Prikhodko S, Jackson M, Goel N, Hudait MK, Huffaker DL, Goorsky MS, Kodambaka S, Hicks RF (2009) Self-catalyzed epitaxial growth of vertical indium phosphide nanowires on silicon. Nano Lett 9:2223–2228View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ihn SG, Song JI (2007) InAs nanowires on Si substrates grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology 18:355603View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Chang YA, Fitzner K, Zhang MX (1988) The solubility of gases in liquid metals and alloys. Prog Mater Sci 32:97–259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Okamoto H (1990) In-P (indium-phosphorus). In: Massalski TB (ed) Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol 3, 2nd edn., p 2269Google Scholar
  48. Okamoto H (1990) As-In (arsenic-indium). In: Massalski TB (ed) Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol 1, 2nd edn., pp 288–289Google Scholar
  49. Law DC, Sun Y, Li CH, Visbeck SB, Chen G, Hicks RF (2002) Structure of arsenic-treated indium phosphide .001. surfaces during metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy. Phys Rev B 66:045314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1995) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS spectra. Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  51. Tizei LHG, Chiaramonte T, Ugart D, Cotta MA (2009) III–V semiconductor nanowire growth: does arsenic diffuse through the metal nanoparticle catalyst? Nanotechnology 20:275604View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kanjanachuchai S, Euaruksakul C (2014) Directions and breakup of self-running In droplets on low-index InP surfaces. Cryst Growth Des 14:830–834View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Persson AI, Björk MT, Jeppesen S, Wagner JB, Wallenberg LR, Samuelson L (2006) InAs1-xPx nanowires for device engineering. Nano Lett 6:403–407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Samuelson L, Omling P, Grimmeiss HG (1983) Alloying mechanisms in MOVPE GaAs1-xPx. J Cryst Growth 61:425–426View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zardo I, Conesa-Boj S, Peiro F, Morante JR, Arbiol J, Uccelli E, Abstreiter G, Morral AF (2009) Raman spectroscopy of wurtzite and zinc-blende GaAs nanowires: polarization dependence, selection rules, and strain effects. Phys Rev B 80:245324View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Suomalainen S, Hakkarainen TV, Salminen T, Koskinen R, Honkanen M, Luna E, Guina M (2015) Te-doping of self-catalyzed GaAs nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 107:012101View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Park et al. 2016

Advertisement