Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Theoretical Calculations of Refractive Properties for Hg3Te2Cl2 Crystals

Nanoscale Research Letters201611:251

  • Received: 11 October 2015
  • Accepted: 10 May 2016
  • Published:


This paper reviews the optical properties, such as refractive index, optical dielectric constant, and reflection coefficient of the Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals. The applications of the Hg3X2Y2 crystals as electronic, optical, and optoelectronic devices are very much determined by the nature and magnitude of these fundamental material properties. The origin of chemical bonding in the crystals is very important for definition of the physical and chemical properties. The main structural feature of the Hg3X2Y2 crystals is the presence of covalent pyramids [XHg3] and linear X-Hg-X groups. Optical properties are calculated according to the model proposed by Harrison. The refractive index in the spectral region far from the absorption edge is determined within the generalized single-oscillator model. The calculated results are found to be in good agreement with experimental data.


  • Corderoite structure
  • Wyckoff positions
  • Polarizability
  • Refractive index


The crystal structure of mercury chalcogenhalogenides possesses a lot of features which promote the appearance of structural instabilities. All chalcogenchlorides and Hg3Te2Br2 are crystallized in the corderoite structure and described by the T5-I213 space symmetry group [13]. The main feature of synthesized and natural mercury chalcogenhalogenides is the formation of numerous polymorphic modifications and existence of isomorphic substitutions in chalcogen and halogen anion sublattices. Interest in them is caused by the ability to form continuous raw of solid solutions that allows them for different variations of physical and chemical properties. Hg3X2Y2 crystals are characterized by physical properties such as optical activity, high refractive index, transparency in visible and IR-range, photoconductivity, and electrooptical effect. Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds, their synthesis and polymorphism are investigated in Refs. [110]. Optical activity and refractive index are studied in Refs. [1, 1014]. Raman and IR spectra are investigated in Refs. [2, 15, 16]. The detailed research results of absorption edge are presented in Refs. [1719]. These structural and optical properties of mercury chalcogenhalogenides crystals can be combined in modelling of physical and chemical characteristics of nanomaterials for nonlinear optic devices.

The present paper is aimed at the theoretical studies of the refractive index and reflection coefficient in Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals. It should be noted that the refractive index is one of the fundamental properties of a material because it is closely related to the electronic polarizability of ions and the local field inside the material. Besides that, theoretical study of refractive index gives more detailed information about crystals properties. The refractive index evaluation is of considerable importance for applications in integrated optic devices, where materials refractive index is the key parameter for device design. The calculated results are compared with available experimental data. Such results are obtained for the first time.

Structure of Hg3X2Y2 Crystals

A special feature of all modifications of Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds is a stronger ordering of the anions, as compared to the cations, owing to the strong covalent Hg–X bonds, which form various configurations with virtually the same «fixed» bond-lengths. The studied structures consist of strong covalent and connected pyramids [XHg3] and linear X–Hg–X groups which in different structural types form different spatial connections. At the same time, the presence of the «hinge-joint» bonds in the covalent –X–Hg–X–Hg–X– radical results in the appearance of many polymorphic modifications [7]. The structure of the α-Hg3S2Cl2 type is realized in the cases, when the chalcogen anion size is more than halogen anion size S2− (0.182 nm), Se2− (0.193 nm), Te2− (0.211 nm) >Cl (0.181 nm); Te2− (0.211 nm) >Br (0.196 nm) [20].

Hg3X2Y2 gyrotropic crystals are characterized by the structure with spiral chains. The atoms are located on the upward or downward double spirals in the structure (Fig. 1). There are some groups of atoms in the structure of Hg3X2Y2 crystals, which act as an optically active chromophore. [HgX2Y4] octahedra form spiral chains with triple spiral axis in the (111) direction of elementary cube. A characteristic feature of all compounds is the presence of two sets of octahedral spirals with different radii and twisting directions. They are located side by side, oriented in the same direction, and consistently alternated. The spiral which is twisted counterclockwise has a larger radius. The step of both spirals is equal. Sign of Hg3Te2Cl2 crystal rotation is caused by the strong influence of ХVI and YVII atoms on the symmetry of local crystal field and the polarization medium as a result. Angle Y-Hg-Y plays a decisive role because averaging over the four X-Hg-Y angles results to the same value in all compounds. Chalcogen atom replacement leads to a significant variation of Y-Hg-Y angle and stronger displayed on the optical activity value than replacement of halogen atom [1]. The unique structural features of Hg3X2Y2 crystals are conditioned by fundamental properties of conformational polymorphism.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Crystal structure of Hg3Te2Cl2

Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals belong to the ternary chalcogenhalogenide compounds. The number of formula units in the unit cell is Z = 4. The unit cell of Hg3Te2Cl2 contains 14 atoms, including six HgII, four TeVI, and four ClVII. Other crystal parameters are presented in Table 1. Hg3Te2Cl2 structure is characterized by the following set of possible nuclear positions: С2(4), С2(6), С1(12). Atoms occupy the positions: 12Hg (b) [x 0 0.25] (x = 0.31), 8Te (a) [x x x] (x = 0.28), 8Cl (a) [x x x] (x = 0.025). The lattice parameter is a = 9.33 Å [2, 15]. The Wyckoff positions define by the next set:
$$ \begin{array}{l}12\mathrm{B}(2)\hbox{--} \left\{\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 0,\kern0.5em 1/4\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{1/2-\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 0,\kern0.5em 3/4\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{1/4,\kern0.5em \mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 0\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{0,\kern0.5em 1/4,\kern0.5em \mathrm{x}\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{3/4,\kern0.5em 1/2-\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 0\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{0,\kern0.5em 3/4,\kern0.5em 1/2-\mathrm{x}\right\};\hfill \\ {}8\mathrm{A}(3)\hbox{--} \left\{\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em \mathrm{x},\kern0.5em \mathrm{x}\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{1/2+\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 1/2-\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em -\mathrm{x}\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{1/2-\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em -\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 1/2+\mathrm{x}\right\},\kern0.5em \left\{-\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 1/2+\mathrm{x},\kern0.5em 1/2-\mathrm{x}\right\}.\hfill \end{array} $$
Table 1

Crystal data of Hg3Te2Cl2

Chemical formula


Space group


Formula units per cell


 a (nm)


 b (nm)


 c (nm)




Ratio of anions radii X 2−/Hal


Structural type


There are two types of chemical bonds in investigated crystals: the covalent—between mercury and chalcogen atoms and ionic—between mercury and halogen atoms [1820]. The Hg–Cl bond length is 2.99 Å, while the Hg–Te bond length is 2.65 Å. Besides that, many interesting chemical bond aspects connected with existence of intrinsic defects. As Hg–Te is the main chemical bond, such structure interpretation reflects physical and chemical properties of the Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals.


For calculation of the refractive index, the Harrison bonding-orbital method was used [20, 21]. Using the Harrison bonding-orbital theory is irreplaceable for calculation of parameters, which describe the structure of energy bands, as well as for understanding the physical nature of this structure. The essence of bonding-orbital method consists in the description of the localized charges on the basis of interactions between electronic orbitals of structure atoms. As follows from the theory, analysis of covalent and ionic crystals is almost always based on the description of electron conditions in crystal in the form of linear combination of electronic orbitals. The complex approach to the investigation of optical properties includes some steps: neglect all matrix elements between bonding and anti-bonding states; reduce Hamiltonian matrix to two matrixes, one of which is constructed on valence band conditions, and another—on conductive band conditions; use Wannier functions for zeroing of matrix elements between bonding and anti-bonding states in matrix. As the result, one can obtain the diagonal matrix elements, which correspond to Wannier energy levels, as well as matrix elements between the bonding states, responsible for splitting of these levels in bands.

Most optical properties of semiconductors are integrally related to the particular nature of their electronic band structures. Band structure is in turn related to the type of crystallographic structure, the particular atoms, and their bonding. Both the valence band and conduction band states are important for prediction of the refractive index or optical dielectric constant.

Results and Discussion

The crystal optical investigations provide an important information concerning the nature and the properties of Hg3X2Y2 crystals. The refractive index is a very important physical parameter related to the microscopic atomic interactions. From the theoretical stand point, there are basically two different approaches in viewing this subject: on one hand, considering the crystal as a collection of an electric field, the refractive index will be related to the density and the local polarizability of these entities. On the other hand, considering the crystalline structure represented by a delocalized picture, the refractive index will be closely related to the energy band structure of the material, thorough quantum-mechanical analysis required is complicated and the results obtained are very particular [2224]. The refractive index in the spectral region far from the absorption edge was determined within the generalized single-oscillator model. It makes possible to find the energies of filled electronic states using the Hartree–Fock values [21] for the valence levels in complex crystals. The approach becomes particularly useful when it is simplified by including only nearest-neighbor couplings and using universal parameters, which allows direct prediction of all properties [25].

According to the special points method [20, 21, 25, 26], any average of any property over the electronic energy band is replaced by the values at a single special wave number, the Baldereschi point k. That wave number is chosen such that the first few sets of Fourier components of the band vanish, just as one would choose a point halfway to the Brillouin zone boundary in a one-dimensional crystal. As follows from the theory, the interaction between orbitals of cation and anion is described by the energy:
$$ {E}_k=\frac{E_s+{E}_p}{2}\pm \sqrt{{\left(\frac{E_s-{E}_p}{2}\right)}^2+f{(k)}^2{{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{sp}\upsigma}}^2}, $$
where f (k) depending upon the relative phase and orientation of neighboring orbitals.
The first and second terms under the root sign are energies V 3 and V 2. The bonding-orbital method based on definition of bond energy. Covalent bond energy V 2 [25] calculates as:
$$ {V}_2 = \sqrt{f(k)}{V}_{\mathrm{b}}, $$
For different interaction cases V b equals:
$$ \begin{array}{ccc}\hfill {\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{sp}\upsigma}=1.42\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\hbar}}^2}{{\mathrm{md}}^2}\right),\hfill & \hfill {\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{pp}\upsigma}=2.22\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\hbar}}^2}{{\mathrm{md}}^2}\right),\hfill & \hfill {\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{pp}\uppi}=-0.63\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\hbar}}^2}{{\mathrm{md}}^2}\right)\hfill \end{array}, $$
The dominant bands are based upon p-states and s-states, and contributions to the properties depend upon the coupling between neighboring orbitals and their energy difference \( {E}_s-{E}_p \) taken from Hartree–Fock term values [20]. According to [25], the ionic bond energy V 3 equals to half the term-value difference:
$$ {V}_3=\left({E}_s-{E}_p\right)/2, $$
By analysis, the polarizability and susceptibility χ, it is possible to calculate the refractive index. The treatment of bond polarizabilities use cluster approximation based upon special point. It is necessary to calculate the coupling of each occupied band state to every empty state, evaluate the change in charge on every atom, and sum the contributions of the resulting perturbed electron density to obtain a dipole and the exact polarizability. The cluster consists of different states on each of the two neighbors. The individual bond polarizability [25] can be calculated as:
$$ \alpha =\gamma \frac{\left(1-{\alpha}_p\right){\alpha}_p{e}^2{d}^2}{\left(1+{\alpha}_p\right){V}_3}, $$
where \( {\alpha}_p \) is polarity and defines as:
$$ {\alpha}_p=\frac{V_3}{\sqrt{V_2^2+{V}_3^2}}, $$
The optical dielectric susceptibility is calculated as the sum of polarizabilities of each bond type by their number per unit volume. Knowledge of susceptibility allows to predict the refractive index. The optical dielectric constant and refractive index are very important in determining the electric and optical properties of the materials. The imaginary part of the dielectric constant shows how a dielectric absorbs energy from an electric field caused by dipole motion. The real part of the dielectric function can be derived from the imaginary part by the Kramers–Kronig relationship. The refractive index n (ω) is given by Eq. (7):
$$ n\left(\omega \right) = {\left[\frac{\varepsilon_1\left(\omega \right)}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{\varepsilon_1^2\left(\omega \right)+{\varepsilon}_2^2\left(\omega \right)}}{2}\right]}^{\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$2$}\right.} $$
where \( {\varepsilon}_1 \) and \( {\varepsilon}_2 \) are the real and imaginary components of the dielectric function, respectively. At low frequency ω = 0, the dielectric constant of a material is related to the refractive index by Eq. (8):
$$ n = \sqrt{\varepsilon }, $$
Reflection coefficient can be calculated as:
$$ R = \frac{{\left(n-1\right)}^2}{{\left(n+1\right)}^2} $$
Thus, using Harrison’s model, the refractive index and reflection coefficient are calculated. The results are presented in Table 2. The following notations are used in Table 2: d is the bond length, Z is the coordination number, V 2 is the energy of covalent bond, V 3 is the energy of ionic bond, γ is the coefficient, α is the polarizability, χ is the susceptibility, n is the refractive index, and R is the reflection coefficient.
Table 2

Calculated parameters of Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals

Bond type

d, Å

N c

V 2, eV

V 3, eV


α, Å3






















It should be noted that theoretical calculations using complex approach always give underestimated values in comparison with experimental data. Refractive index varies from 3.06 at 4650 Å to the vicinity of the absorption edge, then starts to level off and reaches 2.68 at 7000 Å [4] for Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals. The calculated value of the refractive index is n theor = 2.3. A good agreement is observed with experiment [4]. This is verified by the calculation of the optical dielectric constant which depends on the refractive index.


The refractive index calculations of the Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals using the Harrison bonding-orbital method are presented. Satisfactory agreement between experimental data and calculation results is obtained. It is shown that this approximation allows to analyze the optical properties of the Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) crystals. It is evident that structural features, covalent Hg–X chemical bonds of the Hg3X2Y2 crystals reflect their physical and chemical properties. Optical properties play a vital role in understanding the structure and the nature of chemical bonding in the crystals. Refractive index is very important magnitude that decided the optical and electronic behavior of crystals used for possible applications. It can be concluded from the present and previous studies that Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals are perspective nanomaterials for application in nonlinear optical devices. Finally, it should be noted that results obtained in this paper confirm the possibility of their application for analysis of the optical properties of complex compounds.


Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Faculty of Physics, Uzhhorod National University, Pidhirna Str., 46, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine


  1. Bokotey OV (2016) Investigation of gyrotropic properties for Hg3X2Cl2 (X = Se, Te) crystals. J Alloys Compd 678:444–447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bokotey OV, Glukhov KE, Nebola II, Bokotey AA (2016) First-principles calculations of phonons and Raman spectra in the Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals. J Alloys Compd 669:161–166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Minets YV, Voroshilov YV, Pan’ko VV (2004) The structures of mercury chalcogenhalogenides Hg3X2Hal2. J Alloys Compd 367(1-2):109–114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nitsche R (1972) Crystal growth and optical properties of mercury-telluro-chloride Hg3Te2Cl2. Mater Res Bull 7(7):679–683View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Puff H, Harpain A, Hoop K-P (1966) Polymorphie bei quecksilberschwefel-halogeniden. Naturwissenschaften 53(11):274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Puff H, Kuster J (1962) Die Kristallstruktur der kubischen Triquecksilber-dichalkonium-dihalogenide. Naturwissenschaften 49(2):464–465View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pervukhina NV, Vasil’ev VI, Magarill SA, Borisov SV, Naumov DY (2006) Crystal chemistry of mercury sulfohalides of composition Hg3S2Hal2 (Hal: Cl, Br). II. Crystal structures of two polymorphic modifications of Hg3S2Br2-xClx (x = 0.5). Can Mineral 44(5):1247–1255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Voroshilov YV, Slivka VY (1989) Anoksidalnie materialy dlya elektronnoy tekhniki (non-oxide materials for electronic technology). Vyshcha shkola, Lviv, p 199Google Scholar
  9. Batsanov SS, Kolomijchyk VN, Derbenova SS, Erenburg RS (1973) Sintes i phisiko-khimicheskoe izychenie galogenkhalkogenidov rtyti (synthesis, physical and chemical study of mercury chalcogenhalogenides). Neorg Mater 9(7):1098–1104Google Scholar
  10. Voroshilov YV, Hadmashi ZP, Slivka VY, Hudolii VO (1981) Polychenie i estestvennaya opticheskaya aktivnost kristallov khalkogalogenidov rtyti (receiving and natural optical activity of mercury chalcogenhalogenides). Neorg Mater 17(11):2022–2024Google Scholar
  11. Bokotey OV (2015) An influence of structural features on optical properties of mercury chalcogenhalogenides Hg3X2 VIHal2 VII, Abstr. of International research and practice conference: Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials (NANO - 2015), Lviv, Ukraine, 26-29 August., p 320Google Scholar
  12. Bokotey OV, Studenyak IP, Nebola II (2015) Studies of nonlinear optical properties for Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) gyrotropic crystals, Abstr. of IV International conference Nanobiophysics 2015: Fundamental and Applied Aspects, Kyiv, Ukraine, 1-4 October., p 69Google Scholar
  13. Bokotey OV, Nebola II (2015) Refractive index–band gap interrelation in Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) crystals, Abstr. of the XXth International Seminar on Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Lviv, Ukraine, 12-15 September., p 70Google Scholar
  14. Bokotey OV (2015) Refractive index behavior of mercury chalcogenhalogenides Hg3X2Hal2, Abstr. of Ukrainian-German Symposium on Physics and Chemistry of Nanostructures and on Nanobiotechnology, Kyiv, Ukraine, 21-25 September., p 140Google Scholar
  15. Hadmashi ZP, Suslikov LM, Voroshilov YV, Khudolii VA, Seykovska LA, Slivka VY (1985) Optical phonons of Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals. FTT 27(2):566–570Google Scholar
  16. Dovgoshei VN, Mitsa VM, Golovei MI, Gerasimenco VS (1985) Struktyrnie osobennosti girotropnih kristalov halkogalogenidov rtyti (Structural features of mercury chalcogenhalogenides gyrotropic crystals). Ukr J Phys 30(11):1721–1722Google Scholar
  17. Hadmashi ZP, Suslikov LM (1984) Krai pogloscheniya monokristalov Hg3Te2Cl2 (Absorption edge of Hg3Te2Cl2 crystals). FTT 26(2):592–594Google Scholar
  18. Bokotey OV, Vakulchak VV, Nebola II (2015) Electronic structure of mercury chalcogenhalogenides Hg3X2Hal2, Abstr. of Ukrainian-German Symposium on Physics and Chemistry of Nanostructures and on Nanobiotechnology, Kyiv, Ukraine, 21-25 September., p 139Google Scholar
  19. Bokotey OV, Vakulchak VV, Nebola II (2015) Influence of defects on the band structure of Hg3X2Y2 (X = S, Se, Te; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) crystals, Abstr. of the XXth International Seminar on Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Lviv, Ukraine, 12-15 September., p 69Google Scholar
  20. Bokotey OV, Studenyak IP, Nebola II, Minets YV (2016) Theoretical study of structural features and optical properties of the Hg3S2Cl2 polymorphs. J Alloys Compd 660:193–196View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison WA (2004) Elementary electronic structure. revised ed. World Scientific, SingaporeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Balzaretti NM, da Jornada JAH (1996) Solid State Commun 99(12):943View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mecabih S, Amrane N, Belgoumene B, Aourag H (2000) Opto-electronic properties of the ternary alloy Hg1-xCdxTe. Physica A 276:495–507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Forouhi AR, Bloomer II (1986) Optical dispersion relations for amorphous semiconductors and amorphous dielectrics. Phys Rev B 34(10):7018–7026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison WA (2006) Tight-binding theory of the dielectric susceptibilities and transverse charges of insulators. Phys Rev B 74(20):205101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baldereschi A (1973) Mean-value point in the Brillouin zone. Phys Rev B 7(12):5212View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Bokotey. 2016