Open Access

In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Microwave Thermotherapy of Cancer Using Novel Chitosan Microcapsules

Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters201611:334

Received: 18 May 2016

Accepted: 24 June 2016

Published: 15 July 2016


Herein, we develop a novel integrated strategy for the preparation of theranostic chitosan microcapsules by encapsulating ion liquids (ILs) and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The as-prepared chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules exhibit not only significant heating efficacy in vitro under microwave (MW) irradiation but also obvious enhancement of T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, besides the excellent biocompatibility in physiological environments. The chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules show ideal temperature rise and therapeutic efficiency when applied to microwave thermal therapy in vivo. Complete tumor elimination is realizing after MW irradiation at an ultralow power density (1.8 W/cm2), while neither the MW group nor the chitosan microcapsule group has significant influence on the tumor development. The applicability of the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules as an efficient contrast agent for MR imaging is proved in vivo. Moreover, the result of in vivo systematic toxicity shows that chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules have no acute fatal toxicity. Our study presents an interesting type of multifunctional platform developed by chitosan microcapsule promising for imaging-guided MW thermotherapy.


MicrowaveThermotherapyChitosanMicrocapsulesMR imagingIonic liquids


In recent years, microwave (MW) thermotherapy received considerable attention due to many advantages including the ability to achieve effective ablation of large tumors and less heat sink effects, when compared with other cancer therapies such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery [16]. For the clinical application of MW thermotherapy, the main challenge is achieving a balance between complete ablation of tumor tissue and minimum damage to surrounding vital organs [711]. Nanomaterials have emerged with the unique characteristics of localization of the MW irradiation, which results in improving the efficacy of MW hyperthermia and eliminating the limitations. Carbon nanotubes and ferrite compounds have been utilized as MW agents for MW thermotherapy [1216], whose heating efficacy was too low to use in vivo. Microwave thermal therapy uses dielectric hysteresis to produce heat. Heating of the tissue is based on agitation of water molecules or ions under an electromagnetic field of microwave frequency, rather than relying upon current flow and resistive heating [17]. Two main mechanisms are identified that trigger heating by microwave irradiation: dipolar polarization mechanism and ionic conduction mechanism [1820]. The ionic conduction process represents a much higher heat-generating efficacy than the dipolar polarization. Because of their ionic character and high polarizability, room-temperature ionic liquids (ILs) are extremely susceptible to microwave irradiation [2125]. As excellent absorbers, ILs show highly efficient microwave heating, which provide superior benefits for the application of tumor MW thermotherapy. In order to deliver the liquid-phase absorbers to the tumor site, encapsulation of the ILs with biocompatible microcapsules is one of the most promising resolutions. The microcapsules have a compact shell structure, which can confine the oscillation of IL leading to more serious friction and collision of molecules and ions than the free IL. Thus efficient, rapid, and selective heating occurs in the microcapsules.

Chitosan-based materials have sparked considerable interest due to their good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low production costs, all of which result in their potential use in various biological and clinical applications, including slimming, wound dressing, and tissue engineering, especially those involving drug delivery [2629]. Chitosan is composed of amido and hydroxyl groups, which can be combined with polymer and metal. Bhise et al. have designed sustained release systems for the anionic drug naproxen using chitosan as drug carrier matrix [30]. Sun et al. have designed enoxaparin/chitosan nanoparticulate delivery systems, providing very stable complexes that led to a significantly improved drug uptake [31]. Guo et al. have developed chitosan-coated hollow CuS nanoparticles that assemble the cytosine-guanine oligodeoxy nucleotides for photothermal therapy in a mouse breast cancer model [32]. As compared to chitosan particles with single modality, dual modalities with both the therapeutic and imaging function offer great potential to satisfy the increasing requirements in advanced tumor theranostic platform. In the platform, the imaging modality can be used as contrast agents to light up tumors and the therapeutic modality can be used to destroy tumors. However, success on preparation of chitosan microcapsules with payload of MRI contrast agents and MW absorbers for imaging-guided MW thermotherapy, to best of our knowledge, has not yet been reported.

In this work, we have developed a facile strategy to construct chitosan-based microcapsules as MW susceptible agent for tumor thermotherapy and contrast agents for enhanced tumor MR imaging. The chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules showed high MW conversion efficiency in vitro MW heating experiment. In vitro and in vivo toxicity results uncovered that these microcapsules exhibited good biocompatibility. For use in a mice model, the as-prepared microcapsules showed dramatically enhanced MW thermotherapy outcomes in vivo. It is the first report that using chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules to kill the H22 tumor cells in mice with 100 % of tumor elimination. In vivo imaging results demonstrated that these chitosan/Fe3O4@ILmicrocapsules can achieve MR imaging-guided MW thermotherapy. Our study highlights the great potential of chitosan-based microcapsules for cancer theranostic applications.



Ethylene glycol, ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), sodium acetate (NaAc), sodium citrate, acetate, glutaraldehyde, and chitosan (deacetylation degree = 80–95 %) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co., Ltd. Soybean oil was obtained from Beijing Guchuan Oil Co. Span 80 was purchased from Institute of Tianjin Jinke Fine Chemicals. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (IL) was purchased from Shanghai Chengjie Chemical Co., Ltd. Mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) was obtained purchased from Alfa Aesar. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E stain) were obtained from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology (China). All chemicals were used directly in our work without further purification.

Preparation of Fe3O4 NPs

The Fe3O4 NPs were prepared by a gradient solvothermal method. In a typical methods, 0.5 g FeCl3·6H2O was dissolved in 5 mL ethylene glycol under stirring. Then, 0.15 g sodium citrate and 0.9 g NaAc were completely dissolved in 10 mL ethylene glycol. And the above solutions were mixed together under stirring and the pH value was adjusted to 7. The solutions were translated into a 50-mL Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 200 °C for 4 h. The black product was magnetically collected and rinsed for four times with deionized water and absolute ethanol, respectively, and then dried at 50 °C for 24 h.

Preparation of Chitosan/Fe3O4@IL Microcapsules

Chitosan was completely dissolved in deionized water with 3 % acetate, 0.02 g Fe3O4 NPs, and 8 % ILs at a concentration of 0.045 g/mL and marked as water phase. Fifty-milliliter soybean oil and 1.2 mL Span 80 were mixed well and marked as oil phase. Ten-milliliter water phase was slowly added into oil phase under stirring at 1200 r/min for 10 min to form water/oil emulsion (Fig. 1a). Then, 1 mL 50 % glutaraldehyde was added into the emulsion and heated at 60 °C for 60 min. Finally, the microcapsules was collected by washing for four times with deionized water and absolute ethanol, respectively, followed by drying under 45 °C for 24 h.


The morphology of as-prepared microcapsules was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4300, Hitachi). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was also recorded by Hitachi S-4800 SEM. The surface functional groups of the microcapsules were employed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR, Varian, Model 3100 Excalibur). Thermogravimetric analyses were performed on a thermal analyzer (TG, ICES-001, Canadian) in the range 25–800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in nitrogen atmosphere. Canon DS126231 digital camera was recorded to take the tumor photographs. The UV/vis absorption spectra were measured by a spectrophotometer (JASCO V-570) at room temperature. Magnetic measurements were investigated by a magnetometer (Model PPMS-9).

In Vitro MW Heating Experiment

In the MW heating experiment, the as-prepared microcapsules were diluted to 1 mL by saline solution at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. Then, the solution was added into a 12-well plate with a thin bottom and exposed to MW irradiation (1.8 W, 5 min, Beijing Muheyu Electronics Co., LTD). The temperature of the solution was detected with a fiber thermometers (Beijing Dongfangruizhe Technology Co., LTD).

In Vitro Cytotoxicity

Fresh blood was collected from rabbit’s heart in a 10 mL centrifuge tube, containing EDTA as the anticoagulant (anticoagulant to blood ratio, 1:9, v/v). The whole blood was centrifuged and washed with PBS for three times and rediluted in PBS, to give a 2 % erythrocyte suspension. 0.5 mL microcapsules were added into glass tubes, followed by the addition of 0.5 mL erythrocyte suspension and kept at room temperature for 3 h. Subsequently, all the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 3 min. The hemoglobin released from the erythrocytes in the supernatant was determined at 570 nm by an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. Distilled water and PBS solution were used as a positive control (100 % lysis) and negative control (0 % lysis), respectively. The content of hemolysis rate (%) was determined as following formula: Hemolysis rate (%) = (tested sample − negative control)/(positive control − negative control) × 100. Triplicate samples were repeated and the values were averaged.

The viability of cells were evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenylte-trazolium bromide (MTT) assays. Briefly, HepG2 cells were plated out at a concentration of 4 × 104 cells/mL in 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. Then, different concentrations of microcapsules were added and incubated for 24 h. The control group was only incubated with HepG2 cells. MTT-phosphate saline-buffered solution (20 μL) was then added and incubated for another 4 h. Finally, the medium were removed and 150 mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added into each well. The absorbance of the suspension was recorded by a scanning multiwall spectrometer (Multiskan MK3 Thermo). The cell viability (%) = (absorbance of experimental)/(absorbance of control groups) × 100. All of the experiments were repeated five times for each group.

MW Heating Therapy

Experimentation with animals was governed by the Regulations of Experimental Animals of Beijing Authority and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Peking University.

All ICR mice were obtained from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, and used under the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care. An infrared thermal mapping apparatus (FLIR SC620) with MW apparatus (Beijing Muheyu Electronics Co., LTD) were used to irradiate tumors in our experiment. To develop H22 tumors, 107 H22 cells (0.1 mL) were injected in the right axillary region of each mice. When the size of the tumor reached to the 300 mm3, microcapsules were intratumorally injected at the concentration of 200 mg/kg. After the injection of microcapsules for 1 hour, the tumor of each mouse was then irradiated by the MW at the power density of 1.8 W/cm2 for 5 min. There were four groups of mice (control, MW, chitosan/Fe3O4@IL + MW, chitosan/Fe3O4@IL) with five mice for each group. The tumor sizes were measured by a vernier caliper every 3 days and calculated as the volume (V) = (length) × (width)2/2. After 17 days of therapy, mice were sacrificed and the tumor tissues in each group were weighed.

MR Imaging

T2-weighted MR imaging was obtained by using a 3.0 T MR imaging instrument at room temperature (Signa HDx; General Electric Medical Systems, USA). Dilutions of microcapsules in water with different concentrations as a contrast agent were placed in 4.0 mL eppendorf tubes for T2-weight MR imaging. Relativity values of R 2 were calculated through the curve fitting of 1/T2 relaxation time versus the microcapsules concentration. For in vivo MR imaging, 10-mg microcapsules were dispersed in 0.2 mL saline solution, then chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules (200 mg/kg) were intratumoral injected into the H22 tumor-bearing mice and then taken for the T2-weighted MR imaging tests.

In Vivo Systematic Toxicity

A total of 20 healthy ICR mice were randomly divided into three groups and injected subcutaneously in the axillary region with 2000 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and without treatment. Body weight was measured every 3 days by electronic scale. After 17 days, mice were sacrificed for performing a full necropsy. Organs (including liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were harvested, fixed in 10 % formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological examination using standard techniques, and observed by a optical fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S, CCD: Ri1).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization of Microcapsules

The experimental route to fabricate chitosan/Fe3O4@IL is presented in Fig. 1a. Starting from Fe3O4 NPs prepared following a gradient solvothermal method, we synthesized chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules by a single coacervation route. The chitosan was cross-linked by GA to form microcapsules. The morphological characterizations of the chitosan, chitosan/Fe3O4, and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules were evaluated by SEM (Fig. 1b). The microcapsules had similar metric, an almost spherical shape. Shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1 are the size distributions of microcapsules, obtained by more than 200 samples in Fig. 1b. The results indicated that the mean diameters of chitosan, chitosan/Fe3O4, and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules were 4.95, 5.19, and 6.17 μm, respectively.
Fig. 1

Chitosan synthesis and characterization. a A schematic illustration of microcapsules synthesis. b SEM images of chitosan, chitosan/Fe3O4, and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules. c FT-IR spectra of chitosan, chitosan/Fe3O4, and chitosan/Fe3O4@ILmicrocapsules. d Heating curves of water, saline, and microcapsules under MW irradiation at a power density of 1.8 W/cm2 for 5 min

FT-IR analysis was carried out to confirm the possible groups of chitosan microcapsules. As shown in Fig. 1c, the characteristic absorption peaks at 1634, 1063, and 523 cm−1 were only observed in the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules, which are assigned to C–C stretching vibrations of the imidazolium ring, asymmetric stretching vibrations of BF4 and out-plane C–H bending vibrations of imidazolium ring, respectively [33, 34]. These distinct peaks suggest the presence of IL. The elemental in microcapsules was carried out by EDS. Additional file 1: Figure S2 shows the EDS spectra of chitosan microcapsules, and only in chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules shows the existence of F element. Moreover, as presented in Additional file 1: Figure S3, after the final thermal decomposition, the percentages of weight of the chitosan, chitosan/Fe3O4, and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules were 16.49, 21.54, and 23.79 %, respectively. The higher residual of content of the chitosan/Fe3O4 and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL is certainly attributable to the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@IL in the microcapsules, respectively.

An important feature of IL was the MW-induced thermal effect, which could be used for ablation of tumors. The temperature elevation of microcapsules was investigated under MW irradiation (1.8 W/cm−2) for 5 min. Figure 1d shows the temperature of the aqueous dispersion of microcapsules as a function of irradiation time. A rapid temperature increase of the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules when exposed to MW irradiation was observed up to a high level (ΔT = 25.4 °C). However, the water, saline, chitosan, and chitosan/Fe3O4groups showed much less temperature change (ΔT = 7.8 °C, ΔT = 17.4 °C, and ΔT = 17.5 °C, respectively), suggesting that either saline or chitosan/Fe3O4 microcapsules had less effect on the temperature elevation. MW could directly excite ILs in chitosan microcapsules, which led to significantly heating [3539]. The temperature elevation suggested that chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules could act as an efficient MW susceptible agent for tumor ablation.

In Vitro Cell Experiments

Before using the synthesized chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules for biomedical application, we firstly evaluated microcapsules in vitro toxicity to cells. Herein, hemolytic behavior of red blood cells was carried out to evaluate its biocompatibility, where deionized water and phosphate-buffered saline were defined as positive and negative controls, respectively. As presented in Fig. 2a, the hemolysis rates of all the samples were below 5 %. The photographs of hemolysis results show that almost no hemolysis of red blood cells can be detected, suggesting that their good blood compatibility (inset of Fig. 2a). Moreover, viabilities of HepG 2 cells were measured after incubating with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL at tested concentration. According to the MTT assay, approximately >93 % of the cells remained viable after being exposed to the microcapsules for 24 h. Therefore, the hemolytic activity and low cytotoxicity demonstrate that chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules exhibits excellent biocompatibility and thus can serve as a promising platform for cancer treatment.
Fig. 2

In vitro cytotoxicity. a Hemolyticrate of red blood cells incubated with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules at various concentrations for 3 h, using PBS (−) and deionized water (+) as negative and positive controls, respectively. Inset: the photo images for direct observation of hemolysis for microcapsules. b Viabilities of HepG2 cells incubated with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules with different concentrations for 24 h

In Vivo Cancer MW Therapy

Encouraged by the strong MW heating effect of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules presented in vitro experiment, we then investigated in vivo cancer MW therapy using chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules in a H22 tumor mouse model. Female Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) mice bearing H22 tumors were intratumorally injected with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules (200 mg/kg) and then exposed to the MW irradiation at the power density of 1.8 W/cm2 for 5 min. Mice without treatment were used as the control group. The temperature changes on tumor were real-time monitored by an infrared thermal camera and a fiber thermometer during MW irradiation. It was uncovered that the temperature of the tumor injected with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules rapidly increased to about 51.2 °C (ΔT = 25.0 °C) within 5 min under MW irradiation (Fig. 3a, b), which is enough to kill cancer cells [40, 41]. In marked contrast, tumors showed much less temperature change (41.3 and 40.9 °C, respectively).
Fig. 3

In vivo MW therapy. a IR thermal imaging of tumor-bearing mice injected with none and chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules under MW irradiation (1.8 W/cm2, 5 min). b The temperature changes on tumor of mice under different treatment in a. c Tumor growth curves of different groups of tumor after various treatment. d Representative photos of mice bearing H22 tumor after different treatments indicated

Next, the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of microcapsules-induced MW cancer treatment was investigated. Four groups of H22 tumor-bearing mice with five mice per group were used in our experiment. For the treatment groups, tumors were intratumorally injected with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules (200 mg/kg) and then irradiated by the MW at a power density of 1.8 W/cm2 for 5 min (Chitosan/Fe3O4@IL + MW). Other control groups of mice included untreated mice (Control), mice with chitosan/Fe3O4@ILmicrocapsule injection without MW irradiation (Chitosan/Fe3O4@IL), and mice with MW irradiation without chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules injection (MW). The tumor sizes were measured by a caliper every 3 days after treatment. As shown in Fig. 3c, d and Additional file 1: Figure S4, we found that tumors treated with chitosan/Fe3O4@ILmicrocapsules were effectively ablated after MW irradiation. However, tumor in other control groups showed partially damaged and exhibited a similar growth speed, suggesting that either MW irradiation (1.8 W/cm2) or chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsule injection by itself does not affect the tumor development (Fig. 3c, d and Additional file 1: Figure S4). Our results demonstrate that chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules would be a powerful MW agent for effective tumor ablation.

MR Imaging

MR imaging can provide imaging with good anatomical details and functional information with real-time monitoring manner. In consideration of that, Fe3O4-based particles have the potential to be used as contrast agent for T2 MR imaging. To explore the possibility of using chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules as a T2-weighted MR contrast agent, we measured its magnetic properties and T2 relaxation time. The magnetic curves of the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules obtained at room temperature (Additional file 1: Figure S5) showed the saturation magnetization of 0.55 eumg−1. When placed a magnet, the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules was rapidly attracted by the magnet (inset of Additional file 1: Figure S5). As presented in Fig. 4a b, an obvious concentration-dependent darkening effect in T2-weighted MR images acquired by a 3.0 T magnetic resonance system at room temperature was observed for chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules. The T2 relaxivity (r2) of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules was measured to be 0.27943 mg−1 mL s−1. Next in vivo experiments were used to characterize chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules as a MR imaging probe. Female ICR mice bearing H22 tumors were intratumorally injected with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules (200 mg/kg) and imaged by a 3.0 T MR imaging instrument. As presented in Fig. 4c, an obviously darkened T2 MR signals decrease of 32.27 % in the tumor appeared, indicating that our microcapsules would be a promising candidate as a contrast agent in MR imaging for cancers therapy.
Fig. 4

Magnetic properties of chitosan/Fe3O4@ILmicrocapsules. a The T2 relaxation rates (r 2) of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules at different concentrations. b T2-weighted MR images of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL. c T2-weight MR imaging of H22 tumor-bearing mice before (left) and after (right) intratumoral injection of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules

In Vivo Systematic Toxicity

To further study the chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules on the toxicity of target organs, healthy ICR mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 5) and injected subcutaneously in the axillary region with 2000 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and without treatment. Then, all mice were sacrificed and collected their heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney organs for histological examination with standard techniques at day 16. Neither death nor significant body weight variation was noticed after microcapsules treatment during the treatment (Fig. 5a). There was no noticeable organ damage or inflammation in these groups (Fig. 5b). Although the systematic long-term toxicology of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules in animals remain to be carefully examined, our preliminary results indicate that chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules may not be obviously toxic to mice.
Fig. 5

In vivo systematic toxicity. a Body weight curves from healthy ICR mice injected subcutaneously in the axillary region with 2000 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and without treatment. b H&E stained images of major organs. Healthy ICR mice injected with microcapsules were sacrificed 16 days. No noticeable abnormality was observed in major organs including the liver, kidney, spleen, and lung


In summary, we have successfully fabricated a new generation of MW theranostic agent based on chitosan microcapsules, which could be used for MR imaging-guided MW thermotherapy of cancer. The hemolysis rate and HepG2 cells viability test with chitosan/Fe3O4@IL presented good biocompatibility when their concentration were less than 2000 mg/mL and less than 1000 mg/mL, respectively. The tumor cells were effectively ablated using low power density (1.8 W/cm2) upon a short irradiation time (5 min). Besides, the use of these well-prepared chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules as MR contrast agents was proved. Our design and the construction of chitosan/Fe3O4@IL microcapsules could provide more opportunities for further MW thermotherapy applications.



The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Hi-Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) (Nos. 2013AA032201 and 2012AA022701), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 4161003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61171049, 31400854, 51202260 and 81201814), and Project of Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province Education Department (LZ2015075).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People’s Republic of China
Laboratory of Controllable Preparation and Application of Nanomaterials, Center for Micro/Nanomaterials and Technology and Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China


  1. Li X, Fan W, Zhang L, Zhao M, Huang Z, Li W, Gu Y, Gao F, Huang H, Li C, Zhang F, Wu P (2011) CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of adrenal malignant carcinoma: preliminary results. Cancer 117:5182–5188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Petros RA, DeSimone JM (2010) Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:615–627View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Timmerman RD, Bizekis CS, Pass HI, Fong Y, Dupuy DE, Dawson LA, Lu D (2009) Local surgical, ablative, and radiation treatment of metastases. CA-Cancer J Clin 59:145–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad F, Gravante G, Bhardwaj N, Strickland A, Basit R, West K, Sorge R, Dennison AR, Lloyd DM (2010) Renal effects of microwave ablation compared with radiofrequency, cryotherapy and surgical resection at different volumes of the liver treated. Liver Int 30:1305–1314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dooley WC, Vargas HI, Fenn AJ, Tomaselli MB, Harness JK (2010) Focused microwave thermotherapy for preoperative treatment of invasive breast cancer: a review of clinical studies. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1076–1093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang S, Tan L, Liang P, Liu T, Wang J, Fu C, Yu J, Dou J, Li H, Meng X (2016) Layered MoS2 nanoflowers for microwave thermal therapy. J Mater Chem B 4:2133–2141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Long D, Mao J, Liu T, Fu C, Tan L, Ren X, Shi H, Su H, Ren J, Meng X (2016) Highly stable microwave susceptible agents via encapsulation of Ti-mineral superfine powders in urea-formaldehyde resin microcapsules for tumor hyperthermia therapy. Nanoscale 8:11044–11051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ohlan A, Singh K, Chandra A, Dhawan SK (2010) Microwave absorption behavior of core-shell structured poly (3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene)-barium ferrite nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2:927–933View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu KF, Dupuy DE (2014) Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 14:199–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Palomaki TA, Harlow JW, Teufel JD, Simmonds RW, Lehnert KW (2013) Coherent state transfer between itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscillator. Nature 495:210–214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang W, Liu B, Wang S, Liu T, Fu C, Ren X, Tan L, Duan W, Meng X (2016) Doxorubicin-loaded ionic liquid–polydopamine nanoparticles for combined chemotherapy and microwave thermal therapy of cancer. RSC Adv 6:32434–32440View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li G, Wang L, Li W, Ding R, Xu Y (2014) CoFe2O4 and/or Co3Fe7 loaded porous activated carbon balls as a lightweight microwave absorbent. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:12385–12392View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Z, Cai W, He L, Nakayama N, Chen K, Sun X, Chen X, Dai H (2007) In vivo biodistribution and highly efficient tumour targeting of carbon nanotubes in mice. Nat Nanotechnol 2:47–52View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu T, Pang Y, Zhu M, Kobayashi S (2014) Microporous Co@CoO nanoparticles with superior microwave absorption properties. Nanoscale 6:2447–2454View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tan L, Tang W, Liu T, Ren X, Fu C, Liu B, Ren J, Meng X (2016) Biocompatible hollow polydopamine nanoparticles loaded ionic liquid enhanced tumor microwave thermal ablation in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:11237–11245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu X, Zhu W, Jia C, Zhao R, Schmidt W, Wang Y (2011) Synthesis and microwave absorbing properties of highly ordered mesoporous crystalline NiFe2O4. Chem Commun 47:5337–5339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Patel DD, Lee JM (2012) Applications of ionic liquids. Chem Rec 12:329–355View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhu Y, Wang W, Qi R, Hu X (2004) Microwave-assisted synthesis of single-crystalline tellurium nanorods and nanowires in ionic liquids. Angewandte Chemie 116:1434–1438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wakai C, Oleinikova A, Ott M, Hermann W (2005) How polar are ionic liquids? Determination of the static dielectric constant of an imidazolium-based ionic liquid by microwave dielectric spectroscopy. J Phy Chem B 109(36):17028–17030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Deetlefs M, Seddon KR (2003) Improved preparations of ionic liquids using microwave irradiation. Green Chem 5(2):181–186View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Law MC, Wong KY, Chan TH (2002) Solvent-free route to ionic liquid precursors using a water-moderated microwave process. Green Chem 4(4):328–330View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas AM, Gomez AJ, Palma JL, Yap WT, Shea LD (2014) Heparin–chitosan nanoparticle functionalization of porous poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels for localized lentivirus delivery of angiogenic factors. Biomaterials 35(30):8687–8693View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Custódio CA, Cerqueira MT, Marques AP, Reis RL, Mano JF (2015) Cell selective chitosan microparticles as injectable cell carriers for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 43:23–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim GP, Ong HY, Lee BB, Ahmad MS, Singh H, Ravindra P (2014) Effects of process variables on size of chitosan-alginate capsules through extrusion-dripping method. Adv Mater Res 925:8–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen YL, Wang CY, Yang FY, Wang BS, Chen JY, Lin LT, Leu JD, Chiu SJ, Chen FD, Lee YJ, Chen WR (2014) Synergistic effects of glycated chitosan with high-intensity focused ultrasound on suppression of metastases in a syngeneic breast tumor model. Cell Death Dis 5(4):e1178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Bhise KS, Dhumal RS, Chauhan B, Paradkar A, Kadam SS (2007) Effect of oppositely charged polymer and dissolution medium on swelling, erosion, and drug release from chitosan matrices. Aaps Pharmscitech 8(2):E110–E118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang L, Sun Y, Shi C, Li L, Guan J, Zhang X, Ni R, Duan X, Li Y, Mao S (2014) Uptake, transport and peroral absorption of fatty glyceride grafted chitosan copolymer-enoxaparin nanocomplexes: influence of glyceride chain length. Acta Biomater 10:3675–3685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo L, Yan DD, Yang D, Li Y, Wang X, Zalewski O, Yan B, Lu W (2014) Combinatorial photothermal and immuno cancer therapy using chitosan-coated hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8(6):5670–5681View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ahrens ET, Bulte JWM (2013) Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Immunol 13(10):755–763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin LS, Cong ZX, Cao JB, Ke KM, Peng QL, Gao J, Yang HH, Liu G, Chen X (2014) Multifunctional Fe3O4@ polydopamine core–shell nanocomposites for intracellular mRNA detection and imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 8(4):3876–3883View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Li J, He Y, Sun W, Luo Y, Cai H, Pan Y, Shen M, Xia J, Shi X (2014) Hyaluronic acid-modified hydrothermally synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted tumor MR imaging. Biomaterials 35(11):3666–3677View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ammamn M, Fransaer J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of hybrid materials based on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquid and Dawson-type tungstophosphate K7[H4PW18O62] · H2O and K6[P2W18O62] · 13H2O. J Solid State Chem 184:818–824View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Smiglak M, Pringle JM, Lu X, Han L, Zhang S, Gao H, MacFarlane DR, Rogers RD (2014) Ionic liquids for energy, materials, and medicine. Chem Commun 50:9228–9250View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang P, Wu T, Han B (2014) Preparation of catalytic materials using ionic liquids as the media and functional components. Adv Mater 26:6810–6827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ding K, Lu H, Zhang Y, Snedaker ML, Liu D, Maciá-Agulló JA, Stucky GD (2014) Microwave synthesis of microstructured and nanostructured metal chalcogenides from elemental precursors in phosphonium ionic liquids. J A Chem Soc 136(44):15465–15468View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Scholten JD, Neto BAD, Suarez PAZ (2014) Ionic liquids as versatile media for chemical reactions. Environmentally friendly syntheses using ionic liquids 109.Google Scholar
  37. Kamimura A, Murata K, Tanaka Y, Okagawa T, Matsumoto H, Kaiso K, Yoshimoto M (2014) Rapid conversion of sorbitol to isosorbide in hydrophobic ionic liquids under microwave irradiation. Chem Sus Chem 7(12):3257–3259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Barreto JA, O’Malley W, Kubeil M, Graham B, Stephan H, Spiccia L (2011) Nanomaterials: applications in cancer imaging and therapy. Adv Mater 23:H18–H40View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang J, Xu JS, Xu RX (2010) Heat-sensitive microbubbles for intraoperative assessment of cancer ablation margins. Biomaterials 31:1278–1286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu X, Chen HJ, Chen X, Parini C, Wen D (2012) Low frequency heating of gold nanoparticle dispersions for non-invasive thermal therapies. Nanoscale 4:3945–3953View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Yoon J, Cho J, Kim N, Kim DD, Lee E, Cheon C, Kwon C (2011) High-frequency microwave ablation method for enhanced cancer treatment with minimized collateral damage. Int J Cancer 129:1970–1978View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2016