- Nano Express
- Open Access
Synthesis and Characteristics of FePt Nanoparticle Films Under In Situ-Applied Magnetic Field
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 6 April 2016
Accepted: 5 July 2016
Published: 11 July 2016
In situ external magnetic field was applied during the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles via a chemical solution method. FePt nanoparticle films were prepared on Si by a drop-coating method with and without a magnetic field. Annealing at 700 °C in reductive atmosphere was explored to obtain ferromagnetic FePt L10 phase. The effect of in situ-applied magnetic field on the structure, morphology, and magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticle films was characterized. It is found that the applied magnetic field during the chemical synthesis of FePt nanoparticles plays a key role in the crystallinity and magnetic property of FePt nanoparticle films. As-synthesized FePt nanoparticles under the magnetic field are monodispersed and can be self-assembled over a larger area by a dropping method. The applied magnetic field during the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles not only significantly improves the nanoparticles’ c-axis preferred orientation but also benefits the phase transition of FePt nanoparticles from face-centered cubic to face-centered tetragonal structure during the annealing process. The FePt nanoparticle films derived under magnetic field also show some magnetic anisotropy.
With the rapid development of magnetic recording technique, the superparamagnetic effect becomes the bottleneck to further increase magnetic storage density. The ferromagnetic L10 FePt assemblies with face-centered tetragonal (fct) structure has extremely high magnetocrystalline anisotropy, good chemical stability, and resistance to oxidation, regarded as the most promising candidate for ultra-high-density magnetic recording media [1–3]. Meanwhile, FePt nanoparticles and their multifunctional surfaces have also shown great potentials in biomedical applications such as multimodality imaging probes and target-specific drug/gene delivery [1, 4].
Chemical solution method has become an attractive route to obtain FePt nanoparticles with the controllable size, well-defined shape, and ordered monolayer assemblies since Sun et al. made great success in preparing monodisperse FePt nanoparticles . Based on this work, a lot of studies have been conducted to explore and optimize the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles, such as modifying fabrication methods [6–10], optimizing assembly methods [7, 11–14], and fabricating FePt one-dimensional nanorods/nanowires [15–18].
For example, elements such as Ag , Au , and Sb  with low surface energy were doped into FePt nanoparticles to decrease the phase transition temperature of FePt from face-centered cubic (fcc) to fct structures. However, the morphology of FePt nanoparticles became uncontrolled, and self-assembled arrays over a large area were destroyed after doping. A series of inorganic core-shell structures such as ZnO [22, 23], MnO , NiO , and SiO2  covering on FePt nanoparticles have been synthesized to obtain multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. In addition, polymer templating [8, 27], micellar approach with SiO2 thin film capping , direct synthesis [29, 30], and salt-matrix technique  have also been attempted. Recently, our group explored the combination of self-assembled FePt nanoparticles and atomic layer-deposited Al2O3 capping for fabrication of patterned magnetic nanocomposites with improved the coercivity and stability of FePt nanoparticles under high-temperature annealing . In addition, sol-gel-derived oxide matrixes also prevented FePt nanoparticles from sintering and aggregation [33, 34].
In this work, we reported that in situ magnetic field was applied during the chemical solution synthesis process of FePt nanoparticles. And the drop-coating process was explored to form FePt nanoparticle films with and without a magnetic field. Under a magnetic field, as-synthesized FePt nanoparticles are monodispersed and can be self-assembled over a larger area by a dropping method. As-prepared FePt nanoparticle films were then annealed at 700 °C for 60 min in forming gas (7 % H2 + 93 % Ar) to obtain the L10 phase of FePt. It is revealed that an applied magnetic field during chemical synthesis not only significantly improves the c-axis preferred orientation but also benefits the phase transition of FePt nanoparticles from fcc to fct structures. The FePt nanoparticle films chemical-synthesized under the magnetic field also show some magnetic anisotropy.
Synthesis of FePt Nanoparticles
In a typical procedure, 49.4 mg of Pt(acac)2 was mixed with 20 mL of phenyl ether under nitrogen flow. The mixture was heated to 50 °C and stirred until the platinum source dissolved in the solvent completely. Then the mixed solution was heated to 150 °C, and 80 μL of Fe(CO)5, 40 μL of OA, and 42.5 μL of OAm were added step by step under in situ-applied magnetic field with continuous stream of nitrogen. Finally, the solution was heated up to 220 °C at the rate of 5 °C/min and refluxed for 30 min under the nitrogen protection. After the black solution cooling down to room temperature naturally, 50 μL of OA, 50 μL of OAm, and absolute ethanol were added into the mixture to a total volume of 80 mL in a clean beaker. The black products were then precipitated by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant solution was discarded. The precipitate was then dissolved in 10 mL of hexane and precipitated again in 40 mL of absolute ethanol by centrifugation. The black FePt nanoparticles were obtained by repeating the separation process for 2~3 times. The FePt nanoparticles were dispersed in 6 mL of octane and stored in a brown glass bottle under the nitrogen conditions. For comparison study, we also prepared the control samples of FePt nanoparticles using the same processing without an applied magnetic field.
Preparation of FePt Nanoparticle Films
Assembled FePt nanoparticles on the HF-treated n-Si (100) substrates (1.0 × 1.0 cm2) were prepared by dropping a drop of FePt solution (FePt nanoparticles dispersed in octane with concentration of 2 mg/mL). The FePt nanoparticle films were first dried at room temperature and then heated to 120 °C for 2 h in a baking oven to remove organic solvent completely. In situ external magnetic field was applied during the drop-coating process to form FePt nanoparticle films on Si, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. Two SmCo permanent magnets were placed horizontally to produce a magnetic field by inserting 1-cm-high plastic spacer.
The applied magnetic field conditions of different samples during the chemical synthesis process for FePt nanoparticles and the drop-coating process for FePt nanoparticle films
Applied magnetic field
The structure and crystalline phase were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max 2000, Rigaku) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The morphology and microstructure of various samples were characterized using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 S-twin, FEI) operating at 200 kV. The compositions of all the samples were analyzed by an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) attached to a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Zeiss). Magnetic properties of the fct-FePt were measured by a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID, MPMS XL-7, Quantum Design) with a maximum field of 35 kOe.
Results and Discussion
The unannealed I(200)/I(111), annealed I(001)/I(111), D(001), and S of c-axis orientation degree and chemical ordering of 1#, 2#, and 3# samples under different magnetic field conditions before and after annealing
0.46 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.02
0.63 ± 0.07
0.72 ± 0.02
0.89 ± 0.03
1.04 ± 0.03
3.47 ± 0.10
0.76 ± 0.03
0.76 ± 0.11
0.65 ± 0.02
2.17 ± 0.07
0.77 ± 0.02
After 700 °C annealing in forming gas, the Bragg peaks of (001), (110), (002), and (201) appear in the XRD patterns of Fig. 2b, suggesting the phase transition from disordered fcc to ordered ferromagnetic fct. It is easily observed that the peak intensity of (001) and (002) from the 2# and 3# samples, respectively, is much stronger than that from the 1# sample. Especially for the 2# sample, the (001) peak intensity has exceeded the usual strongest (111) peak one (PDF #01-43-1359), and the intensity of the (002) peak split from the (200) peak is also higher than the (200) peak one. It means that after annealing, the fct-FePt nanoparticle films from the applied magnetic field synthesis process exhibit a c-axis preferred orientation, i.e., fct-FePt nanoparticles aligning along the c-axis—the easy axis of magnetization perpendicular to the surface of films . In situ-applied magnetic field during the chemical synthesis process has evidently improved the c-axis preferred orientation of annealed FePt nanoparticle films.
where the I(001)/I(111) standard value of 0.3 is obtained from diffraction patterns of fct-FePt powders with random orientation, while the I(001)/I(111) measured values can be calculated from the XRD patterns of the 1#, 2#, and 3# annealed samples.
where c and a are the lattice constants for the fct-FePt, evaluated from the (001) and (110) peaks of the XRD patterns, respectively. The c/a measured values can be calculated for the partially ordered phase. For the fully ordered-phase FePt, the c/a standard value is 0.9639 based on the XRD card of PDF #01-43-1359.
The related data of c-axis orientation degree and chemical ordering of the 1#, 2#, and 3# samples under different magnetic conditions before and after annealing are summarized in Table 2, including unannealed I(200)/I(111), annealed I(001)/I(111), D(001), and S.
It is easily seen from Table 2 that the 2# and 3# samples with applied magnetic field during chemical synthesis show some a-axis preferred orientation than the 1# sample without applied magnetic field before anneal. After annealing, the 2# and 3# samples with an applied magnetic field during chemical synthesis exhibit a significant  preferred orientation with higher D(001) values of 3.47 and 2.17, respectively, whereas the D(001) value of the 1# sample without an applied magnetic field is only 0.19. In addition, an applied magnetic field during the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles also enhances the chemical ordering parameter S of the 2# and 3# samples and benefits the phase transition of FePt nanoparticles from fcc to fct structure during the annealing process.
Why does the applied magnetic field during the chemical synthesis of FePt nanoparticles finally produce c-axis preferred orientation fct-FePt nanoparticle films on Si? It might be related to the nucleation anisotropy induced by an external magnetic field during the chemical synthesis of FePt nanoparticles. The applied magnetic field changes the nucleation barrier of a different orientation, leading to an enhanced a-axis orientation in superparamagnetic FePt particles. During high-temperature annealing, the a-axis orientation fcc nucleation easily induces and yields c-axis orientation fct grains.
In summary, in situ magnetic field was applied during the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles via a chemical solution method. FePt nanoparticle films were formed on Si by a drop-coating method with and without a magnetic field. The influence of in situ-applied magnetic field on the structure, morphology, and magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticle films was characterized deeply. Although in situ magnetic field has no obvious impact on the FePt nanoparticles’ morphology and chemical composition, it is revealed that an applied magnetic field during the synthesis of FePt nanoparticles not only significantly improves the nanoparticles’ c-axis preferred orientation with a larger D(001) of 3.47 but also benefits the phase transition of FePt nanoparticles from fcc to fct structure. The FePt nanoparticle thin films synthesized under a magnetic field also show some magnetic anisotropy. In addition, as-synthesized FePt nanoparticles under a magnetic field are monodispersed and can be self-assembled over a larger area by a dropping method.
This project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51571111), a grant from the State Key Program for Basic Research of China (2015CB921203). Ai-Dong Li also thanks the support of Priority Academic Program Development in the Jiangsu Province and the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20120091110049).
XQ, MYG, and XYZ carried out the sample fabrication and device measurements, and XQ drafted the manuscript. XQ and XJL helped to finish the TEM sample preparation and observation. CL and YQC did the data analysis and interpreted the results. ADL and DW participated in the discussion of the results. ADL supervised the whole work and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Sun SH (2006) Recent advances in chemical synthesis, self-assembly, and applications of FePt nanoparticles. Adv Mater 18:393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeng H, Li J, Liu JP, Wang ZL, Sun SH (2002) Exchange-coupled nanocomposite magnets by nanoparticle self-assembly. Nature 420:395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weller D, Moser A, Folks L, Bet ME, Lee W, Toney M et al (2000) High Ku materials approach to 100 Gbits/in2. IEEE Trans Magn 36:10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hao R, Xing RJ, Xu ZC, Hou YL, Gao S, Sun SH (2010) Synthesis, functionalization, and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater 22:2729View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun SH, Murray CB, Weller D, Folks L, Moser A (2000) Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal superlattices. Science 287:1989View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, Liu JP, Sun SH (2004) One-step synthesis of FePt nanoparticles with tunable size. J Am Chem Soc 126:8394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howard LEM, Nguyen HL, Giblin SR, Tanner BK, Terry I, Hughes AK et al (2005) A synthetic route to size-controlled fcc and fct FePt nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 127:10140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun SH, Anders S, Thomson T, Baglin JEE, Toney MF, Hamman HF et al (2003) Controlled synthesis and assembly of FePt nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 107:5419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elkins KE, Vedantam TS, Liu JP, Zeng H, Sun SH, Ding Y et al (2003) Ultrafine FePt nanoparticles prepared by the chemical reduction method. Nano Lett 3:1647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bian BR, Xia WX, Du J, Zhang J, Liu JP, Guo ZH et al (2013) Growth mechanisms and size control of FePt nanoparticles synthesized using Fe(CO)x(x<5)-oleylamine and platinum (II) acetylacetonate. Nanoscale 5:2454View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shevchenko E, Talapin D, Kornowski A, Wiekhorst F, Kotzler J, Haase M et al (2002) Colloidal crystals of monodisperse FePt nanoparticles grown by a three-layer technique of controlled oversaturation. Adv Mater 14:287View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu ACC, Mizuno M, Sasaki Y, Inoue M, Kondo H, Ohta I et al (2003) Fabrication of monodispersive FePt nanoparticle films stabilized on rigid substrates. Appl Phys Lett 82:4352View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamann HF, Woods SI, Sun SH (2003) Direct thermal patterning of self-assembled nanoparticles. Nano Lett 3:1643View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darling SB, Yufa NA, Cisse AL, Bader SD, Sibener S (2005) Self-organization of FePt nanoparticles on photochemically modified diblock copolymer templates. Adv Mater 17:2446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang C, Hou YL, Kim JM, Sun SH (2007) A general strategy for synthesizing FePt nanowires and nanorods. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:6333View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang ZT, Blom DA, Gai Z, Thompson JR, Shen J, Dai S (2003) High-yield solvothermal formation of magnetic CoPt alloy nanowires. J Am Chem Soc 125:7528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liao HG, Cui LK, Whitelam S, Zheng HM (2012) Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science 336:1011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, Pica T, Jiang YB, Li P, Yano K, Liu JP et al (2007) Synthesis and self-assembly of fcc phase FePt nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 129:6348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang S, Harrell JW, Nikles DE (2002) Reduction of the fcc to L10 ordering temperature for self-assembled FePt nanoparticles containing Ag. Nano Lett 2:1033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang SS, Jia ZY, Nikles DE, Harrell JW (2003) Synthesis, self-assembly, and magnetic properties of [FePt]1-x Aux nanoparticles. IEEE Trans Magn 39:2753View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan QY, Kim T, Purkayastha A, Xu Y, Shima M, Gambino RJ et al (2006) Magnetic properties of Sb-doped FePt nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 99:08N709Google Scholar
- Zeynali H, Akbari H, Ghasabeh RK, Arumugam S, Chamanzadeh Z, Kalaiselvan G (2012) Prevention of sintering during annealing process of FePt nanoparticles coated with ZnO shell. Nano 7:1250043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou TJ, Lu MH, Zhang ZH, Gong H, Chin WS, Liu B (2010) Synthesis and characterization of multifunctional FePt/ZnO core/shell nanoparticles. Adv Mater 22:403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang SS, Miao GX, Shi S, Jia Z, Nikles DE, Harrell JW (2006) Enhanced magnetic properties of self-assembled FePt nanoparticles with MnO shell. J Am Chem Soc 128:1042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeynali H, Sebt SA, Arabi H, Akbari H, Hosseinpour-Mashkani SM, Rao KV (2012) Synthesis and characterization of FePt/NiO core-shell nanoparticles. J Inorg Organomet Polym 22:1314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan QY, Purkayastha A, Kim T, Kroger R, Bose A, Ramanath G (2006) Synthesis and assembly of monodisperse high-coercivity silica‐capped FePt nanomagnets of tunable size, composition, and thermal stability from microemulsions. Adv Mater 18:2569View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mizuno M, Sasaki Y, Yu ACC, Inoue M (2004) Prevention of nanoparticle coalescence under high-temperature annealing. Langmuir 20:11305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ethirajan A, Wiedwald U, Boyen HG, Kern B, Han LY, Klimmer A et al (2007) A micellar approach to magnetic ultrahigh-density data‐storage media: extending the limits of current colloidal methods. Adv Mater 19:406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang SS, Jia ZY, Shi SF, Nikles DE, Harrell JW (2005) Direct synthesis and easy axis alignment of L10-FePt nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 97:10J318Google Scholar
- Wellons MS, Morris WH, Gai Z, Shen J, Bentley J, Wittig JE et al (2007) Direct synthesis and size selection of ferromagnetic FePt nanoparticles. Chem Mater 19:2483View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rong CB, Li DR, Nandwana V, Poudyal N, Ding Y, Wang ZL (2006) Size-dependent chemical and magnetic ordering in L10‐FePt nanoparticles. Adv Mater 18:2984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kong JZ, Gong YP, Li XF, Li AD, Zhang JL, Yan QY et al (2011) Magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticle assemblies embedded in atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3. J Mater Chem 21:5046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kong JZ, Gao MY, Xia YD, Li AD, Zhang JL, Gong YP et al (2012) Preparation and magnetic properties of L10–FePt/TiO2 nanocomposite thin films. J Alloys and Compounds 542:128View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao MY, Li AD, Zhang JL, Kong JZ, Liu XJ, Li XF et al (2014) Fabrication and magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticle assemblies embedded in MgO-matrix systems. J Sol-Gel Sci Tech 71:283View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qiu JM, Bai J, Wang JP (2006) In situ magnetic field alignment of directly ordered L10 FePt nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 89:2506Google Scholar
- Yan ML, Zeng H, Powers N, Sellmyer DJ (2002) L10, (001)-oriented FePt:B2O3 composite films for perpendicular recording. J Appl Phys 91:8471View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan QY, Kim T, Purkayastha A, Ganesan PG, Shima M, Ramanath G (2005) Enhanced chemical ordering and coercivity in FePt alloy nanoparticles by Sb-doping. Adv Mater 17:2233View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim BS, Rahtu A, de Rouffignac P, Gordon RG (2004) Atomic layer deposition of lanthanum aluminum oxide nano-laminates for electrical applications. Appl Phys Lett 84:3957View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravindran P, Kjekshus A, Fjellvag H, James P, Nordstrom L, Johansson B et al (2001) Large magnetocrystalline anisotropy in bilayer transition metal phases from first-principles full-potential calculations. Phys Rev B 63:144409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe K, Masumoto H (1983) On the high-energy product Fe-Pt permanent-magnet alloys. Trans Japan Inst Metals 24:627View ArticleGoogle Scholar