Open Access

Telecommunication Wavelength-Band Single-Photon Emission from Single Large InAs Quantum Dots Nucleated on Low-Density Seed Quantum Dots

  • Ze-Sheng Chen1, 2,
  • Ben Ma2, 3,
  • Xiang-Jun Shang2, 3,
  • Yu He3, 4,
  • Li-Chun Zhang2, 3,
  • Hai-Qiao Ni2, 3,
  • Jin-Liang Wang1 and
  • Zhi-Chuan Niu2, 3Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201611:382

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1597-0

Received: 10 March 2016

Accepted: 20 August 2016

Published: 30 August 2016

Abstract

Single-photon emission in the telecommunication wavelength band is realized with self-assembled strain-coupled bilayer InAs quantum dots (QDs) embedded in a planar microcavity on GaAs substrate. Low-density large QDs in the upper layer active for ~1.3 μm emission are fabricated by precisely controlling the indium deposition amount and applying a gradient indium flux in both QD layers. Time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) intensity suggested that the radiative lifetime of their exciton emission is 1.5~1.6 ns. The second-order correlation function of g 2(0) < 0.5 which demonstrates a pure single-photon emission.

Keywords

Bilayer quantum dot Telecommunication wavelength Single-photon source

Background

Real single-photon sources (SPSs) at telecommunication wavelength are very important for optical fiber-based quantum information that is practical for security application [13]. Semiconductor single quantum dots (QDs) are the best candidates to emit true single photons. In recent decades, InAs QDs [4, 5] have attracted great interest in quantum information [6, 7] and quantum computation [8]. Being compatible with GaAs/Al(Ga)As distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) to form a planar microcavity to enhance QD emission, GaAs-based InAs QDs have demonstrated high-intensity single-photon emission in wavelength <1000 nm [9]. However, it is difficult to obtain 1.3 μm or longer-wavelength single-photon emission on them, which was limited by QD material itself. Although InAs/InP QDs can emit single photons in a 1.55-μm wavelength range [10, 11], it is difficult to combine them with a high-Q DBR cavity. To extend the emission wavelength of InAs/GaAs QDs to telecommunication wavelength, several methods have been developed, such as asymmetric InGaAs/GaAs dot-in-well (DWELL) structure [12], 30 % In-content InGaAs capping layer [13], strain engineering of QDs [14], metamorphic structures [15], and vertically coupled QDs, i.e., bilayer QDs (BQDs) [1618] where active QDs are formed on seed QDs capped with InGaAs. The BQD structure is advantageous on the growth since their growth parameters, such as growth rate, spacer layer thickness, indium deposition amount, and growth temperature can be precisely controlled. High-density BQDs have been grown to realize laser diodes at ~1.5 μm [17, 19]. However, few reports have forced on the growth of low-density BQDs for telecommunication-band single-photon emission. In fact, to realize low-density BQDs, the density and distribution of both the seed QDs and the active QDs and their interlayer strain coupling must be well controlled, which is more difficult than the growth of the traditional single-layer low-density QDs in wavelength <1000 nm.

In this paper, low-density active QDs with emission wavelength at 1.3 μm are realized on low-density seed QDs by well utilizing the interlayer strain coupling and precisely controlling the gradient indium deposition amount in seed QD layer and active QD layer on a non-rotating substrate. These BQDs are embedded inside a GaAs 1-λ cavity in the DBR structure to enhance QD emission in the normal direction. The second-order correlation function measurement demonstrates nice single-photon emission. This is the first time to apply this material system on telecommunication-band single-photon emission. The emission intensity of such single QDs could be improved by optimizing the growth parameters, e.g., the growth temperature of QDs.

Methods

The samples were grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy (MBE; VEECO Gen930 system) on semi-insulating (100) GaAs substrates. The structure of sample A is shown in Fig. 1a. After a 300-nm-thick GaAs buffer layer growth at 580 °C, a planar 1-λ GaAs microcavity sandwiched between 20.5 pairs of the bottom and eight pairs of the top Al0.9Ga0.1As (113.7 nm)/GaAs (98.6 nm) DBR was grown, whose quality factor (Q), as characterized later, is ≈200. The integration into the DBR cavity increases the extraction efficiency of photon emission from a single active QD. In fact, without DBR, there is no micro-photoluminescence (μPL) signal detected in our experiment. The BQD structure capped with 5 nm In0.15Ga0.85As was embedded at the cavity antinode to maximize the cavity enhancement [17, 20, 21]. The QD growth is detailed as follows: on the 80-nm GaAs above the bottom DBR, a sacrificed InAs quantum dot (SQD) layer was deposited at 540 °C by using a very low growth rate of 0.005 ML s−1 and a periodic growth method with a 5-s interruption after each 20-s deposition of indium, under As2-stabilized condition. The critical coverage (θ c) for island formation was monitored by reflection high-energy electron-diffraction (RHEED). As RHEED monitored, the θ c was 2.2 ML. After it, the SQD growth was stopped immediately and the substrate was annealed at 670 °C for 10 min to desorb SQDs completely [22]. Then, a 108.6-nm GaAs was deposited at 580 °C and the substrate temperature was cooled down to 540 °C to grow seed QDs. The substrate rotation was stopped to build a gradient indium flux on the substrate and form density-graded seed QDs. The growth rate and deposition method is the same as that of SQDs but with a sub-θ c indium coverage. After 5 s of growth interruption, the GaAs spacer was grown at 540 °C immediately. It was in moderate thickness (i.e., 8 nm), allowing a capping of seed QDs and a residual strain field on them (as nucleation sites) in favor of vertically aligned active QD formation [20, 23]. A subsequent annealing at 610 °C for 10 min was used to remove the intrinsic defects and flattening the surface [18, 2426] before deposition of the second QD layer. The substrate temperature was cooled down to 480 °C, and 2.0 ML of InAs coverage was deposited in a growth rate of 0.02 ML s−1 to form the active QDs. After a 5-s growth interruption, a 5-nm In0.15Ga0.85As strain-reducing layer (SRL) [20] was grown immediately to maintain QD height for longer-wavelength QD emission [23, 24]. The high substrate temperature and low growth rate of seed QDs increase the migration of indium atoms to form low-density islands [16, 27, 28], while the relatively lower substrate temperature and higher growth rate for active QDs reduce their migration and intermixing with Ga and enable a prior and rapid nucleation of single large QDs on seed QDs driven by strain, in a high optical quality [24, 2931]. On the SRL, a 15-nm GaAs was capped in the same temperature and the rotation of substrate was resumed for the following steps. Finally, the substrate temperature raised to 580 °C to grow the top 181.6-nm GaAs and the top eight pairs of DBR. Sample A with the full cavity structure was used for optical measurements. As shown in Fig. 1b, sample B (reference sample) with uncapped BQDs (1), or uncapped seed QDs (2), grown in the same condition but with a θ c indium coverage in seed QD layer, was used for morphology in atomic force microscopy (AFM). μPL spectroscopy was performed using the confocal microscopy technique with fiber-coupled input and output, excited by a 632.8-nm He-Ne laser, and detected by a liquid nitrogen-cooled CCD detector in the spectrometer. A high numerical aperture objective (×100, NA = 0.55) focuses the laser on the sample, in a diameter of ~2 μm, and enables an effective collection of QD luminescence in this micro-region. The spectral line of single QD emission was filtered for further measurement. Time-resolved PL measurement used a pulsed semiconductor laser (λ 780 nm, repetition rate 80 MHz, pulse width 3 ps, power 3.6 μW) as excitation, multi-channel superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPD; time resolution 120 ps) for detection, and a Hydra Harp 400 module for time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC), to investigate the radiative lifetime of the spectral line. To check its single-photon property, the second-order correlation measurement was done in Hanbury-Brown-Twiss (HBT) scheme [27, 3234] by splitting the signal into two parts with a 50:50 beam splitter in free space and detecting them with two channels of SNSPD separately in fiber coupling, and analyzing the coincidence of both SNSPD outputs with TCSPC.
Fig. 1

Schematic structures of sample A, BQDs in a DBR cavity (a) and sample B, uncapped BQDs (1) or uncapped seed QDs (2) (b)

Results and Discussion

Figure 2a–d shows the AFM images of active QDs along the direction of In flux gradient. Figure 2e–h shows the AFM images of seed QDs, correspondingly. The gradient In flux formed density-graded large QDs [35], among dense small QDs, i.e., bimodal QD size distribution. As In deposition amount decreases along the In flux direction, the large QDs evolve from high density (3.5 × 109 cm−2 in Fig. 2a and ~1.8 × 109 cm−2 in Fig. 2b) to low density (~6 × 108 cm−2 in Fig. 2c), and finally no large QDs (Fig. 2d). In contrast, the density of small QDs in active QD layer increased as the indium deposition decreases, from about 8.8 × 1010 cm−2 in Fig. 2a to ~1.4 × 1011, ~1.7 × 1011, and ~2 × 1011 cm−2 in Fig. 2b–d, respectively. It reflects the collection of small QDs into a larger one during QD growth. In seed QD layer, the density of small QDs is much lower; the density of large QDs reduces from 3.4 × 109 cm−2 in Fig. 2e to 1.8 × 109, 4 × 108 cm−2, and zero in Fig. 2f–h, respectively, similar to the large QDs in the active QD layer. It suggests that the large active QDs are grown on the large seed QDs whose strain field is strong enough to build nucleation sites, enabling a prior QD nucleation, while the dense small QDs in the active layer nucleate due to the low growth temperature and high growth rate that reduced surface diffusion of In atoms [36]. Therefore, the gradient In flux is an efficient way to get low-density BQDs. However, their density is still too high to realize a single QD in a micro-region for single-photon emission. So, in sample A for optical measurement, a sub-θ c indium coverage in seed layer was used to reduce the density of active QDs.
Fig. 2

1 × 1 μm2 AFM images of uncapped active QDs (ad) and uncapped seed QDs (eh) along the direction of In flux gradient. Small black arrows indicate active QDs for 1.3 μm emission

Figure 3 presents the μPL spectra of sample A along the In flux gradient direction. The sample was cooled at 80 K. In Fig. 3a, some weak and broad peaks appear between 1020 and 1200 nm, which are from QDs in the seed layer and the small QDs in the active layer [14, 37]; the ~1.3-μm emission comes from active large QDs. The trend of μPL spectra is well consistent with that of AFM images in Fig. 2. In Fig. 3b, c, the μPL spectra are envelope profiles, corresponding to high-density active QDs. The multiple peaks in Fig. 3d demonstrate an obvious decreasing of the density of active QDs. In Fig. 3e, the sharp single spectral line suggests single QD formation. The big variation of large QD density and their μPL spectra along the In flux direction suggests that QD formation is very sensitive on the indium coverage. On the other hand, the gradient In flux method ensures a high-repeatability of low-density large QD formation.
Fig. 3

μPL spectra of sample A at 80 K. a Full spectrum. be Along the direction of In flux gradient

To further characterize the spectral lines like in Fig. 3e, power-dependent μPL spectroscopy was performed at 10 K in a cryogen-free bath cryostat [38], as shown in Fig. 4a. The spectrum is dominated by the emission of the X exciton at an emission wavelength of 1326.7 nm. At low excitation power, only the X line appeared, in a narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 111 μeV, limited by the resolution of the measurement system and the spectral diffusion from small QDs [2, 3, 39]. By further increasing the excitation power, several other lines appeared, recognized as X and X* exciton lines [40]. As shown in Fig. 4b, the X line at 1326.7 nm showed a near linear dependence on the excitation power (slope = 1.04). The peaks at 1325.3, 1326, and 1327.7 nm, whose power dependence showed slopes of 0.86, 0.88, and 0.97, respectively, and non-saturation under high-power excitation, came from either charged exciton or exciton recombination in neighboring less efficient QDs; they are named as X*. We used a 80-MHz pulsed semiconductor laser to measure the lifetime of exciton X. In Fig. 4c, three peaks were chosen from the 100-ns time window to show the decay dynamics of a single exciton emission. Acquired from exponential fitting, its emission lifetime is 1.58 ± 0.05 ns on average, typical for the radiative lifetimes of exciton recombination in InAs/GaAs QDs at telecommunication wavelength [1, 4143].
Fig. 4

a Excitation power-dependent μPL spectra of sample A at 10 K. X neutral exciton line, X* charged one. b Power dependence of the intensity of exciton lines X (square) and X* (circles). Colored lines: linear fitting, showing different slopes. c Time-resolved μPL intensity of X line, red: exponential decay fitting

In order to gain insight into the photon statistics of the active QD emission from the BQD material system (i.e., the spectral line in the inset of Fig. 5), we measured the second-order time correlation function g (2)(τ) with a HBT setup under continuous-wave excitation. In order to accumulate the single channel counts in limited time, the time resolution was decreased in the experiment. The correlation dip at zero time delay in Fig. 5 provides evidence of antibunching (i.e., quantum) behavior of the light emission from a large InAs/GaAs QD. The solid curve in red is the fit to the data with the commonly accepted formula [44]. The antibunching dip below 0.5 suggests single-photon emission from single active QD. All the above results prove that the combination of a subcritical InAs coverage and a gradual variation of indium flux is convenient and efficient to obtain low-density and high-quality active QDs from the BQD structure in telecommunication band.
Fig. 5

g 2(τ) measurement. This dips to a value of g 2(0) = 0.088 at 10 K. Inset: a typical μPL spectrum after a small grating. The integration time is 8 h

Conclusions

In summary, MBE growth of low-density active QDs is achieved by using a subcritical InAs deposition technology in seed layer and gradual variation of the indium flux. The AFM results show clear transitions from high-density active QDs to low-density ones. As confirmed by μPL spectroscopy, single active QD was obtained at telecommunication wavelength in the low-density region. Its emission lifetime is about 1.5 ns. The power-dependent μPL spectra suggest single exciton states. The second-order autocorrelation measurement with SNSPD yielded g (2)(τ = 0) < 0.5, demonstrating single-photon emission. In our later experiment, the brightness of single active QD can be well improved by optimizing the growth parameter, i.e., such as growth temperature in active layer. As a novel material system potential for single-photon source in telecommunication wavelength, BQDs are expected to be further optimized for high-efficient emission.

Abbreviations

QD: 

Quantum dot

PL: 

Photoluminescence

θ c

Critical coverage

SPS: 

Single-photon sources

DBRs: 

Distributed Bragg reflectors

DWELL: 

Dot-in-well

BQD: 

Bilayer quantum dot

SNSPD: 

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detector

AFM: 

Atomic force microscope

HBT: 

Hanbury-Brown-Twiss

MBE: 

Molecular beam epitaxy

SQD: 

Sacrificed InAs quantum dot

RHEED: 

Reflection high-energy electron-diffraction

SRL: 

Strain-reducing layer

μPL: 

Micro-PL

TCSPC: 

Time-correlated single photon counting

FWHM: 

Full width at half maximum

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Chao-yang Lu, Jian-wei Pan, Yu He, Jin-peng Li, Hui Wang, Jian Qin, Can Wang, Bi-ying Wang, Hua-lei Yin, Bao-quan Sun, and Yong-zhou Xue for their experimental support. This work is supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2013CB933304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91321313, 61505196) and Strategic Priority Research Program B of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB01010200), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation-funded project (No. 2014M561029), and Beijing Key Discipline Fundation of Condensed Matter Physics.

Authors’ Contributions

Z-SC and BM contributed equally to this work. Z-SC grew the samples; carried out the alignment and took part in discussions and in the interpretation of the result; and wrote the manuscript. X-JS and BM participated in the design of the study and discussions of the results. YH helped in the technical support for the characterizations and the reconstruction of the data. X-JS, J-LW, and L-CZ have supervised the writing of the manuscript. H-QN and Z-CN supervised the writing of the manuscript and the experimental part. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Physics and Nuclear Energy Engineering, Beihang University
(2)
State Key Laboratory for Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Science
(3)
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China
(4)
CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China

References

  1. Xu XL, Brossard F, Hammura K, Williams DA, Alloing B, Li LH, Fiore A (2008) “Plug and play” single photons at 1.3μm approaching gigahertz operation. Appl Phys Lett 93:021124View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ward MB, Karimov OZ, Unitt DC, Yuan ZL, See P, Gevaux DG, Shields AJ, Atkinson P, Ritchie DA (2005) On-demand single-photon source for 1.3μm telecom fiber. Appl Phys Lett 86:201111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zinoni C, Alloing B, Monat C, Zwiller V, Li LH, Fiore A, Lunghi L, Gerardino A, de Riedmatten H, Zbinden H, Gisin N (2006) Time-resolved and antibunching experiments on single quantum dots at 1300 nm. Appl Phys Lett 88:131102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Karrai K, Warburton RJ, Schulhauser C, Hogele A, Urbaszek B, McGhee EJ, Govorov AO, Garcia JM, Gerardot BD, Petroff PM (2004) Hybridization of electronic states in quantum dots through photon emission. Nature 427:135–138View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Thompson RM, Stevenson RM, Shields AJ, Farrer I, Lobo CJ, Ritchie DA, Leadbeater ML, Pepper M (2001) Single-photon emission from exciton complexes in individual quantum dots. Phys Rev B 64:201302View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouwmeester D, Ekert A, Zeilinger A (2000) The physics of quantum information. Vol. 3. Springer, BerlinView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H (2002) Quantum cryptography. Rev Mod Phys 74:145–195View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett CH (1992) Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys Rev Lett 68:3121–3124View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schlehahn A, Gaafar M, Vaupel M, Gschrey M, Schnauber P, Schulze JH, Rodt S, Strittmatter A, Stolz W, Rahimi-Iman A (2015) Single-photon emission at a rate of 143 MHz from a deterministic quantum-dot microlens triggered by a mode-locked vertical-external-cavity surface-emitting laser. Appl Phys Lett 107:041105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kazuya T, Yoshiki S, Shinichi H, Tatsuya U, Naoki Y, Toshiyuki M, Motomu T, Yasuhiko A (2004) Non-classical photon emission from a single InAs/InP quantum dot in the 1.3-?m optical-fiber band. Jpn J Appl Phys 43:L993View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu XM, Ha N, Nakajima H, Mano T, Kuroda T, Urbaszek B, Kumano H, Suemune I, Sakuma Y, Sakoda K (2014) Vanishing fine-structure splittings in telecommunication-wavelength quantum dots grown on (111) A surfaces by droplet epitaxy. Phys Rev B 90:081301View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang Z, Oehler A, Resan B, Kurmulis S, Zhou K, Wang Q, Mangold M, Süedmeyer T, Keller U, Weingarten K (2012) 1.55 μm InAs/GaAs quantum dots and high repetition rate quantum dot SESAM mode-locked laser. Scientific reports 2:477Google Scholar
  13. Seravalli L, Frigeri P, Minelli M, Allegri P, Avanzini V, Franchi S (2005) Quantum dot strain engineering for light emission at 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5μm. Appl Phys Lett 87:063101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shimomura K, Kamiya I (2015) Strain engineering of quantum dots for long wavelength emission: photoluminescence from self-assembled InAs quantum dots grown on GaAs (001) at wavelengths over 1.55 μm. Appl Phys Lett 106:082103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Seravalli L, Trevisi G, Frigeri P, Rivas D, Munoz-Matutano G, Suárez I, Alén B, Canet-Ferrer J, Martínez-Pastor J (2011) Single quantum dot emission at telecom wavelengths from metamorphic InAs/InGaAs nanostructures grown on GaAs substrates. Appl Phys Lett 98:173112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke E, Howe P, Taylor M, Spencer P, Harbord E, Murray R, Kadkhodazadeh S, McComb D, Stevens B, Hogg R (2010) Persistent template effect in InAs/GaAs quantum dot bilayers. J Appl Phys 107:113502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Majid MA, Childs DT, Shahid H, Chen S, Kennedy K, Airey RJ, Hogg R, Clarke E, Howe P, Spencer PD (2011) Toward 1550-nm GaAs-based lasers using InAs/GaAs quantum dot bilayers. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of 17:1334–1342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Ru EC, Bennett AJ, Roberts C, Murray R (2002) Strain and electronic interactions in InAs/GaAs quantum dot multilayers for 1300 nm emission. J Appl Phys 91:1365–1370View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke E, Spencer P, Harbord E, Howe P, Murray R (2008) Growth, optical properties and device characterisation of InAs/GaAs quantum dot bilayers. J Phys Conf Ser 107:012003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ngo C, Yoon S, Tanoto H, Hui H, Lim D, Wong V, Chua S (2011) Structural and optical properties of InAs bilayer quantum dots grown at constant growth rate and temperature. J Cryst Growth 323:167–171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sengupta S, Shah S, Halder N, Chakrabarti S (2010) Comparison of single-layer and bilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dots with a higher InAs coverage. Opto-Electronics Review 18:295–299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li MF, Yu Y, He JF, Wang LJ, Zhu Y, Shang XJ, Ni HQ, Niu ZC (2013) In situ accurate control of 2D-3D transition parameters for growth of low-density InAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:1–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mukhametzhanov I, Heitz R, Zeng J, Chen P, Madhukar A (1998) Independent manipulation of density and size of stress-driven self-assembled quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 73:1841–1843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Ru EC, Howe P, Jones TS, Murray R (2003) Strain-engineered InAs/GaAs quantum dots for long-wavelength emission. Phys Rev B 67:165303View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sengupta S, Shah S, Ghosh K, Halder N, Chakrabarti S (2011) Investigation of the effect of larger monolayer coverage in the active layer of bilayer InAs/GaAs quantum-dot structure and effects of post-growth annealing. Applied Physics A 103:245–250View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Joyce PB, Le Ru EC, Krzyzewski TJ, Bell GR, Murray R, Jones TS (2002) Optical properties of bilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dot structures: Influence of strain and surface morphology. Phys Rev B 66:075316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu Y, Li MF, He JF, Zhu Y, Wang LJ, Ni HQ, He ZH, Niu ZC (2012) Photoluminescence study of low density InAs quantum clusters grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology 23:065706View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang SS, Niu ZC, Ni HQ, Xiong YH, Zhan F, Fang ZD, Xia JB (2007) Fabrication of ultra-low density and long-wavelength emission InAs quantum dots. J Cryst Growth 301–302:751–754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang BL, Wang ZM, Mazur YI, Strelchuck VV, Salamo GJ (2006) Growth and characterization of bilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dot structures. physica status solidi (a) 203:2403–2410View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamaguchi K, Yujobo K, Kaizu T (2000) Stranski-Krastanov growth of InAs quantum dots with narrow size distribution. Jpn J Appl Phys 39:L1245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zetian M, Bhattacharya P (2005) Molecular-beam epitaxial growth and characteristics of highly uniform InAs/GaAs quantum dot layers. J Appl Phys 98:023510–023510.5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hafenbrak R, Ulrich SM, Michler P, Wang L, Rastelli A, Schmidt OG (2007) Triggered polarization-entangled photon pairs from a single quantum dot up to 30 K. New J Phys 9:315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Dou XM, Sun BQ, Wang BR, Ma SS, Zhou R, Huang SS, Ni HQ, Niu ZC (2008) Tuning photoluminescence energy and fine structure splitting in single quantum dots by uniaxial stress. Chin Phys Lett 25:1120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanbury Brown R, Twiss RQ (1956) A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius. Nature 178:1046–1048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Moskalenko ES, Karlsson FK, Donchev VT, Holtz PO, Monemar B, Schoenfeld WV, Petroff PM (2005) Effects of separate carrier generation on the emission properties of InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Nano Lett 5:2117–2122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Howe P, Le Ru EC, Clarke E, Abbey B, Murray R, Jones TS (2004) Competition between strain-induced and temperature-controlled nucleation of InAs/GaAs quantum dots. J Appl Phys 95:2998–3004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu Y, Shang X-J, Li M-F, Zha G-W, Xu J-X, Wang L-J, Wang G-W, Ni H-Q, Dou X, Sun B, Niu Z-C (2013) Single InAs quantum dot coupled to different “environments” in one wafer for quantum photonics. Appl Phys Lett 102:201103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. He Y, He YM, Liu J, Wei YJ, Ramirez H, Atatüre M, Schneider C, Kamp M, Höfling S, Lu CY (2014) Dynamically controlled resonance fluorescence from a doubly dressed solid-state single emitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.6076Google Scholar
  39. Patton B, Langbein W, Woggon U (2003) Trion, biexciton, and exciton dynamics in single self-assembled CdSe quantum dots. Phys Rev B 68:125316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Shah S, Halder N, Sengupta S, Chakrabarti S (2012) Comparison of luminescence properties of bilayer and multilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Mater Res Bull 47:130–134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu XL, Williams DA, Cleaver JRA (2004) Electrically pumped single-photon sources in lateral p-i-n junctions. Appl Phys Lett 85:3238–3240View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Fiore A, Zinoni C, Alloing B, Monat C, Balet L, Li LH, Thomas NL, Houdr R, Lunghi L, Francardi M, Gerardino A, Patriarche G (2007) Telecom-wavelength single-photon sources for quantum communications. J Phys Condens Matter 19:225005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Miyazawa T, Nakaoka T, Usuki T, Arakawa Y, Takemoto K, Hirose S, Okumura S, Takatsu M, Yokoyama N (2008) Exciton dynamics in current-injected single quantum dot at 1.55μm. Appl Phys Lett 92:161104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Birowosuto MD, Sumikura H, Matsuo S, Taniyama H, van Veldhoven PJ, Nötzel R, Notomi M (2012) Fast Purcell-enhanced single photon source in 1,550-nm telecom band from a resonant quantum dot-cavity coupling. Scientific Reports 2:321Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016