Skip to main content

Effects of Al Doping on the Properties of ZnO Thin Films Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition


The tuning of structural, optical, and electrical properties of Al-doped ZnO films deposited by atomic layer deposition technique is reported in this work. With the increasing Al doping level, the evolution from (002) to (100) diffraction peaks indicates the change in growth mode of ZnO films. Spectroscopic ellipsometry has been applied to study the thickness, optical constants, and band gap of AZO films. Due to the increasing carrier concentration after Al doping, a blue shift of band gap and absorption edge can be observed, which can be interpreted by Burstein-Moss effect. The carrier concentration and resistivity are found to vary significantly among different doping concentration, and the optimum value is also discussed. The modulations and improvements of properties are important for Al-doped ZnO films to apply as transparent conductor in various applications.


A transparent conductive oxide (TCO) has received considerable attentions and been widely used in electronic and optoelectronic devices [1], such as solar cells [2], liquid crystal [3], and high-definition displays [4], due to their low resistivity and high transmittance. There are various TCO materials, including In, Sb, Zn, Cd, Sn metal oxides, and their composite oxides. Among them, indium tin oxide (ITO) film is the most widely used TCO material [5]. However, the scarce and toxic nature of indium and instability of ITO are the main obstacles for its further development, which arouses the interests of researchers to explore alternative TCO materials for ITO. As a candidate for TCO, ZnO films doped with trivalent metal cations have attracted considerable attentions [69]. Thereinto, Al-doped ZnO (AZO) film is one of the most promising candidates [10], since it has many advantages, such as low cost, abundant resource, non-toxicity, and good stability in hydrogen plasma. Importantly, the optical and electrical behaviors of AZO films can be improved or modified by controlling their doping level [11], which is critical to achieving functionalization and tunability of TCO-based devices. Therefore, it is useful to investigate the correlation between the properties of AZO films and the concentration of Al doping.

Various methods have been used to prepare AZO films, including atomic layer deposition (ALD) [12, 13], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [14, 15], magnetron sputtering [16, 17], and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [18]. Comparing to other techniques, ALD is an excellent deposition technique based on self-limiting surface chemical reactions that can be used to prepare highly uniform and smooth films while their thickness can be precisely controlled.

Various properties of ALD-based AZO films have been reported by many research groups [1922]. Among these properties, optical properties are generally studied and analyzed based on transmission and photoluminescence spectra [21, 22]. However, there are few reports on the properties evaluated by spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) analysis [17]. SE known for its precision and non-destructiveness is a useful tool for the optical characterization of nanostructures [23, 24]. Thickness, optical constants, and band gap energy information can be determined accurately by using SE. With increasing the Al doping level, the modulation of the optical properties provides references to the change of electrical characteristics.

In this work, we investigated the structural, optical, and electrical properties of AZO thin films deposited by ALD technique with a wide range of doping levels. The effects of concentration of Al doping on properties of AZO thin films were discussed in detail. The thickness, optical constants, and band gap of AZO samples were calculated by fitting ellipsometry data in a broadband spectral region. The modulated transmittance of AZO thin films was shown by transmission spectrum measurement. The blue shift of band gap and absorption edge were observed and discussed in light of Burstein-Moss effect. The electrical properties of the films were measured by using a Hall effect measurement system. The optimum concentration of Al for resistivity was studied with the structural and optical properties keeping excellent as well.


Both pure ZnO and Al-doped ZnO thin films were prepared on the Si and quartz substrates through a custom-made ALD reactor. The deposition procedure was at a temperature of 150 °C and a working pressure of 80 Pa. Diethylzinc [DEZ; Zn(C2H5)2] and trimethylaluminum [TMA; Al(CH3)3] were used as the precursors for Zn and Al, respectively, and deionized water (H2O) was used as the oxidant reactant. High purity nitrogen (N2) with a gas flow rate of 50 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute) was used as the carrier to deliver precursors into the chamber and purging gas to take the needless products away from the chamber. During the deposition process, the DEZ and H2O were alternatively introduced into the chamber to grow the ZnO films through DEZ-H2O cycles (DEZ/exposure/N2/H2O/exposure/N2), with pulse times of 0.03/3/15/0.03/5/15 s. For Al-doping into the ZnO films, TMA-H2O cycles of Al2O3 were introduced with the same process as the DEZ-H2O. The ZnO and Al2O3 monolayers grow through their surface reactions [25]. The structure diagram of the investigated AZO film is shown in Fig. 1. The film deposition consists of several super cycles while one super cycle consists of one monolayer of Al2O3 and n monolayers of ZnO. Different Al content of AZO films was obtained by varying the number of ZnO monolayers during one super cycle. Hence, various numbers of DEZ-H2O cycles and one TMA-H2O cycle were repeatedly carried out for film depositions, as the cycle ratio given in Table 1. Same number of ZnO monolayers (N2) was adopted for each sample to fix the thickness of the main body of the films which could avoid the thickness effects on the properties of samples. According to N2 and the cycle ratio of DEZ-H2O and TMA-H2O, the number of super cycle or Al2O3 monolayers (N1) and the total numbers of cycles (N, N = N1 + N2) is also determined.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The structure diagram of the AZO films

Table 1 Deposition parameters for samples, Al composition of AZO films via XPS, and film thicknesses fitted by SE

The chemical compositions and chemical bond states of the thin films were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS analysis was carried out through a scientific spectrometer (Axis Ultra DLD) with an Al KR X-ray source (1486.6 eV). The phase and crystallinity of samples were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker D8 ADVANCE) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The images of atomic force microscopy (AFM) of samples were obtained by using a Bruker Dimension Icon microscope VT-1000 System operated in tapping mode. The spectroscopic ellipsometry measurement was carried out by a vertical variable-angle SE (V-VASE; J.A. Woollam Co., Inc.) in the wavelength range of 200–1000 nm with a spectral resolution of 5 nm. The incident angle was selected as 65, 70, and 75° to insure the reliability of fitting results. Optical transmission spectra were measured with a double beam UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-3600) in the wavelength range of 250–1000 nm. And the electrical properties of the films were measured by using thevan der Pauw method with a Hall effect measurement system (Ecopia HMS3000). All these measurements were carried out at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

Composition and Structure Analysis

To verify the concentration of Al doping, the XPS measurement was carried out on Al-doped ZnO films. Figure 2 reveals the XPS spectra of the AZO films after calibration with carbon peak. In Fig. 2a, the high symmetry energy peak of Zn 2p3/2 is located at 1021.3 ± 0.1 eV, which is approximately equal to the value of Zn in bulk ZnO [26]. It indicates that Zn in AZO films exists in the oxidized states. From Fig. 2b, the main peak located at 530.0 ± 0.1 eV is assigned to lattice oxygen bonded as O2− ions in the ZnO matrix [27]. Here, carbon composition has been removed from those spectra, so no peak of carbon composition can be observed in Fig. 2b. As for Fig. 2c, the energy peaks of Al 2p exhibit a symmetry feature, and is located at around 73.5 ± 0.1 eV which is corresponding to the characteristic peak of Al2O3 [28]. The growth of peak intensity indicates the increase of Al concentration in the films. The concentration of Al is calculated from the ratio of Zn, Al, and O atoms, as shown in Table 1. With varying the cycle ratio of DEZ-H2O and TMA-H2O from 50:1 to 5:1, the Al concentration increases from 3.7 to 12.7 %.

Fig. 2
figure 2

XPS spectra of AZO films grown on Si substrates: (a) Zn 2p peaks; (b) O 1s peaks; (c) Al 2p peaks

The X-ray diffraction patterns of samples grown on Si are shown in Fig. 3. To obtain clearer phenomenon of crystallinity, the samples were annealed at 400 °C in N2 atmosphere for 1 h. The crystalline structure of the films exhibits a hexagonal wurtzite structure with growth directions of ZnO (100) or (002). No clear peaks of Al2O3 manifests the deposited Al2O3 is amorphous under the growth conditions in this work. The crystalline state and crystal orientation of these films are found to change with the increasing doping concentration of Al3+. The pure ZnO film shows a preferred growth with ZnO (002) direction, and the peak position locates at about 34.5°. However, the (002) peak disappears and new ZnO (100) peak becomes dominant after Al doping. The evolution of ZnO peaks demonstrates that Al-doping affects the growth mode of ZnO films, which is similar to the results reported by Banerjee et al. [29]. With further increasing Al doping, no peak is observed for AZO 5:1 sample, which indicates the AZO film at 12.7 at.% Al is amorphous. Since the Al2O3 layer by ALD is amorphous in our growth conditions, the Al2O3 doping layers destroy the crystal quality of the AZO 5:1 films, which causes the disappearance of its (100) peak. From Fig. 3, it can also be observed that the ZnO (100) peak shifts to a larger diffraction angle with the increasing Al3+ content. Here, the Al3+ ions (ion radius 0.53 Å) is smaller than Zn2+ ions (ion radius 0.74 Å), so the increasing Al concentration will reduce the lattice constant of samples by substitutions of Zn2+ ions with Al3+ [30].

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD patterns of samples grown on Si substrates after annealing

The surface morphologies of the samples grown on Si substrates are analyzed by using the AFM method with a scanning area of 5 × 5 μm2. The 3D AFM images of the samples are shown in Fig. 4. All the films show good uniformity over the whole scanning area. The hill-shaped features with average lateral dimensions 50–100 nm can be observed on the surface of samples. The root-mean-square roughness (R q ) of each samples calculated from AFM data is less than 1.00 nm, as given under their AFM images, respectively. It is clear that all samples present smooth surface with inessential surface roughness. Therefore, the surface scattering is weak enough for SE analysis, which makes the analysis more reliable [31].

Fig. 4
figure 4

AFM 3D images of pure ZnO and AZO thin films grown on Si substrates

Optical Properties of Samples

Spectroscopic ellipsometry is generally applied for the investigation of the thickness, optical properties of samples, which is based on measuring the change in the polarization state of a linearly polarized light reflected from the sample surface. In order to get more accurate information, Si is selected as the substrate to provide enough reflected light in SE measurement. For SE analysis, an optical model of our samples is firstly constructed, which consists of a semi-infinite Si substrate/pure ZnO or AZO film/air ambient structure. No roughness layer is introduced, due to the smooth surface of samples revealed by AFM measurements. The obtained ellipsometry spectra (Ψ and Δ at range of 200–1000 nm) of the films are fitted by using the Forouhi-Bloomer dispersion model (Additional file 1)[32]. This dispersion model is widely used to describe the optical properties in the spectral region which is dominated by inter-band transitions and contains the information of the band gap [32]. The thickness, optical constants, and band gap of the films are evaluated in a fitting procedure by minimizing the root-mean-square error (RMSE) which defined as follows [33]:

$$ \mathrm{RMSE}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2x-y-1}{\displaystyle {\sum}_{i=1}^x\left[{\left({\varPsi}_i^{\mathrm{cal}}-{\varPsi}_i^{\exp}\right)}^2+{\left({\varDelta}_i^{\mathrm{cal}}-{\varDelta}_i^{\exp}\right)}^2\right]}} $$

Here, x is the number of data points in the spectrums, y is the number of variable parameters in the model, and “exp” and “cal” represent the experimental and the calculated data, respectively.

The fitted thickness of samples is shown in Table 1. With the increasing concentration of Al, the thickness of the film displays a growing trend due to the increased total numbers of cycles. Figure 5 illustrates the refractive index n and extinction coefficient k of the films with various doping levels at the wavelength range of 200–1000 nm. The calculated optical constants of the pure ZnO films obtained by ALD are in good agreement with our previous work [34]. Due to the Al doping is not deep enough, optical constants of AZO 50:1 is very close to pure ZnO. Figure 5a demonstrates the refractive index n of the films with various doping levels. Obviously, the refractive index of films decreases gradually with doping level increasing, since Al impurity can act as effective n-type donors to generate free carriers. The doping of Al2O3 increases the free carrier concentration in films, which results in the decrease of the refractive index of the films [35]. So, the refractive index can be modulated by Al doping level. Figure 5b describes the extinction coefficient k of the films with various doping levels. It can be seen that the k of all films is close to zero infinitely in the wavelength range of 400–1000 nm, which indicates that the films are nearly transparent in this wavelength region. Besides, a blue shift of the absorption edge can be observed with the increasing doping level.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The optical constants of samples grown on Si substrates: a the refractive index n. b The extinction coefficient k

In order to better understand the blue shift of absorption edge, Tauc method is used to calculate the band gap of the sample by using formulas as follows [35]:

$$ {\left(\alpha h\nu \right)}^2=A\left(E-{E}_g\right) $$
$$ \alpha =\frac{4\pi k}{\lambda } $$

where A is a constant, E g is the optical band gap energy, α is the optical absorption coefficient which can be calculated from extinction coefficient (k) and wavelength of SE results. In order to simplify the calculation, Tauc extrapolation is utilized to obtain the band gap energy of samples. As shown in Fig. 6, we made a plot of (αhν)2 versus the photon energy. The optical band gap can be determined by the linear fitting. Through extrapolation, the point value of fitted line and x axis is E g , as revealed in the inset figure of Fig. 6. The band gap of the ZnO film is 3.3 eV, which agrees well with the ideal band gap of pure ZnO. And the E g displays a growing trend with the increasing concentration of Al. The tendency is similar to that of other elements doped ZnO and In2O3:Sn films (TCO materials) [36]. It can be interpreted by the Burstein-Moss effect [36, 37]. ZnO is a n type semiconductor material with direct transition, and its Fermi level will enter into the conduction band when it is heavily doped. The state below Fermi level is occupied by electrons. The absorption transition process of light can only exist between the valence band and the vicinity to Fermi level. It results the optical band gap of films moves to the high energy region. Moreover, the Burstein-Moss effect is related to the carrier density. Extrinsic Al3+ are substituted for Zn2+ in the AZO films, so the spare electrons from Al3+ can increase the concentration of free carriers in films, resulting in the growth of optical band gap of the films. It can be described by the equation as follows [18]:

Fig. 6
figure 6

Evaluated optical band gap of samples grown on Si substrates

$$ {E}_g={E}_{g0}+\varDelta {E}_g^{\mathrm{BM}}={E}_{g0}+\frac{h^2}{8{m}_{\mathrm{e}}^{*}}{\left(\frac{3}{\pi}\right)}^{2/3}{n}_e^{2/3} $$

where E g0, ∆E g BM, n e , h, and m e * are the intrinsic forbidden band width, band gap increment caused by Burstein-Moss effect, electron carrier density, Planck’s constant, and the effective electron mass in the conduction band, respectively. In addition, the ideal band gap of pure ZnO is 3.3 eV and that of Al2O3 is 8.7 eV [29]. So, with the increasing Al doping level, the band gaps of films are increased.

Figure 7 illustrates the transmittance spectra of samples with various doping levels. The absorption edge of the samples can be found in the range from 300 to 400 nm. Blue shift of absorption edge is observed clearly with rising Al doping level, which is consistent to the results of SE analysis shown in Fig. 5b. This blue shift could be attributed to the rising of band gap energy resulting from Burstein-Moss effect. With the increasing Al doping level, the optical band gap of films is growing, which causes the absorption edge shift to short wavelength region. Moreover, it is clear that the optical transmittance of the films was slightly enhanced with the growing Al content, and the transmittance in the visible region is still higher than 85 %. The transmittance value is close to that of other common TCO films [38], which is important for the applications in the field of solar cell.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Transmittance spectra of samples grown on quartz substrates with various doping levels

Electrical Properties of Samples

Transparent conductor is one of the most common applications of AZO films. The electrical property of AZO films is also an important factor for its performance in devices. So, carrier concentration and resistivity of the films are assessed by using a Hall effect measurement system. In order to avoid the spatial resistivity distribution, the films are deposited on quart substrates, and their test results are revealed in Fig. 8. In the case of pure ZnO film, the carrier concentration and the resistivity were 1.77 × 1019 cm−3 and 5.98 × 10−1 Ωcm, respectively. As Al incorporated into ZnO films, the carrier concentration of AZO films at first increases rapidly and then reaches to the maximum value of 4.41 × 1020 cm−3 for AZO 20:1 film. After that, the carrier concentration of AZO films was abruptly reduced. As for the resistivity, it displays an opposite tendency, and the lowest value is 1.28 × 10−2 Ωcm also for AZO 20:1 film. The carrier concentration and resistivity of our AZO films are similar to other results of ALD-based AZO samples [20, 29, 39]. But it is slight different from those of AZO films deposited by the other methods, which use the bulk incorporation of dopants. By contrast, Al atoms in ALD-based AZO films would be more easily to cluster and form stoichiometric Al2O3 (insulator) [20]. Therefore, the carrier concentration of ALD-based AZO samples is a little lower, while the resistivity is a little higher.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Carrier concentration and resistivity of samples grown on quartz substrates

From Fig. 8, the resistivity of pure ZnO is the highest due to its low carrier concentration. After Al doping, extrinsic Al3+ substitutes into host Zn2+ sites and provides an extra electron, which improves the carrier concentration. So, the resistivity decreases in the beginning. With the improving doping level, the increase of Al2O3 (insulator) concentration leads to the rise of resistivity. In addition, the lowest resistivity is 1.28 × 10−2 Ωcm for AZO 20:1 film, as shown in Fig. 8. So, the optimum Al concentration is 4.9 at.%, AZO 20:1, which is deposited by controlling a number of super cycles consistent with a DEZ/H2O:TMA/H2O cycle ratio of 20:1, as mentioned in the experimental section. Furthermore, AZ0 20:1 films possessed not only optimum carrier concentration and resistivity but also excellent optical transmission in solar cell absorption wavelength range. It is crucial for AZO films to be applied as transparent conductor.


We have investigated the structural, optical, and electrical properties of ALD-based AZO films with doping concentrations ranging from 3.7 to 12.7 at.% for applications as transparent conductor materials. The inessential surface roughness within 1.00 nm shows the high morphological quality of the films deposited by ALD technology. The diffraction peak shifts from ZnO (002) to ZnO (100) with increasing Al content indicate that Al doping can change the growth mode of ZnO films. SE analysis has been adopted to reveal the thickness, optical constants, and band gap of samples. A blue shift of absorption edge of extinction coefficient appears with a growing trend of optical band gap energy due to Burstein-Moss effect. Meanwhile, the blue shift is also shown in optical transmission spectra with the average transmittance that is beyond 85 % in the visible region. Moreover, the lowest resistivity, 1.28 × 10−2 Ωcm, is found for AZO 20:1 film with an Al content of 4.9 at.%. The results of this study can be a useful reference for practical applications and engineering design.



Atomic force microscopy


Atomic layer deposition


Al-doped ZnO


Chemical vapor deposition




Indium tin oxide


Pulsed laser deposition


Root-mean-square error


Root-mean-square roughness


Spectroscopic ellipsometry


Transparent conductive oxide




X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


X-ray diffraction


  1. He WW, Ye CH (2015) Flexible transparent conductive films on the basis of Ag nanowires: design and applications: a review. J Mater Sci Techol 31:581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulze K, Maennig B, Leo K et al (2007) Organic solar cells on indium tin oxide and aluminum doped zinc oxide anodes. Appl Phys Lett 91:073521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katayama M (1999) TFT-LCD technology. Thin Solid Films 341:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Betz U, Kharrazi Olsson M, Marthy J, Escolá MF, Atamny F (2006) Thin films engineering of indium tin oxide: large area flat panel displays application. Surf Coat Tech 200:5751–5759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin JJ, Li ZQ (2014) Electronic conduction properties of indium tin oxide: single-particle and many-body transport. J Phys: Condens Matter 26:343201

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leenheer A, Perkins J, van Hest M, Berry J, O’Hayre R, Ginley D (2008) General mobility and carrier concentration relationship in transparent amorphous indium zinc oxide films. Phys Rev B 77:115215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhosle V, Tiwari A, Narayan J (2006) Metallic conductivity and metalsemiconductor transition in Ga-doped ZnO. Appl Phys Lett 88:032106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim D, Yun I, Kim H (2010) Fabrication of rough Al doped ZnO films deposited by low pressure chemical vapor deposition for high efficiency thin film solar cells. Curr Appl Phys 10:S459–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinhauser J, Faÿ S, Oliveira N, Vallat-Sauvain E, Ballif C (2007) Transition between grain boundary and intragrain scattering transport mechanisms in boron-doped zinc oxide thin films. Appl Phys Lett 90:142107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu QY, Hao S, Shen B et al (2013) Preparation and optical-electrical properties of Al-doped ZnO films. Res Chem Intermed 39:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benhaoua B, Rahal A, Benramache S (2014) The structural, optical and electrical properties of nanocrystalline ZnO:Al thin films. Superlattice Microst 68:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajeh MM, Hampton ST, Kevin S, Dante S, Messaoud B, Aswini KP, Kiran D, Ratnakar P (2013) Electrical conductivity and photoresistance of atomic layer deposited Al-doped ZnO films. J Vac Sci Technol A 31:01A146.

  13. Wu Y, Potts SE, Hermkens PM, Knoops HCM, Roozeboom F, Kessels WMM (2013) Enhanced doping efficiency of Al-doped ZnO by atomic layer deposition using dimethylaluminum isopropoxide as an alternative aluminum precursor. Chem Mater 25:4619–4622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knoops HCM, BWH V de l, Smit S, Ponomarev MV, Weber JW, Sharma K, Kessels WMM, Creatore M (2015) Optical modeling of plasma-deposited ZnO films: electron scattering at different length scales. J Vac Sci Technol A 33:021509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin XJ, Zhao L, Shao GJ, Wang N (2013) Influence of solvents on deposition mechanism of Al-doped ZnO films synthesized by cold wall aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films 542:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bikowski A, Welzel T, Ellmer K (2013) The impact of negative oxygen ion bombardment on electronic and structural properties of magnetron sputtered ZnO:Al films. Appl Phys Lett 102:242106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sago K, Kuramochi H, Iigusa H, Utsumi K, Fujiwara H (2014) Ellipsometry characterization of polycrystalline ZnO layers with the modeling of carrier concentration gradient: effects of grain boundary, humidity, and surface texture. J Appl Phys 115:133505

  18. Liu Y, Li Q, Shao H (2009) Optical and photoluminescent properties of Al-doped zinc oxide thin films by pulsed laser deposition. J Alloys Compd 485:529–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahn CH, Lee SY, Cho HK (2013) Influence of growth temperature on the electrical and structural characteristics of conductive Al-doped ZnO thin films grown by atomic layer deposition. Thin Solid Films 545:106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee DJ, Kim HM, Kwon JY et al (2011) Structural and electrical properties of atomic layer deposited Al-doped ZnO films. Adv Funct Mater 21:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi YJ, Gong SC, Johnson DC et al (2013) Characteristics of the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of Al-doped ZnO thin films deposited by atomic layer deposition. Appl Surf Sci 269:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang AJ, Chen TF, Lu SH (2015) Effects of doping and annealing on properties of ZnO films grown by atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang JB, Zheng YX, Zhao DD, etc. Ellipsometric study on size-dependent melting point of nanometer-sized indium particles. J Phys Chem C 2016. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02735.

  24. Zhang RJ, Chen YM, Lu WJ et al (2009) Influence of nanocrystal size on dielectric functions of Si nanocrystals embedded in SiO2 matrix. Appl Phys Lett 95:161109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Na JS, Peng Q, Scarel G, Parsons GN (2009) Role of gas doping sequence in surface reactions and dopant incorporation during atomic layer deposition of Al-doped ZnO. Chem Mater 21:5585–5593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Strohmeier BR, Hercules DM (1984) Surface spectroscopic characterization of the interaction between zinc ions and γ-Al2O3. J Catal 86:266–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nefedov VI, Firsov MN, Shaplygin IS (1982) Electronic structures of MRhO2, MRh2O4, RhMO4 and Rh2MO6 on the basis of X-ray spectroscopy and ESCA data. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 26:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Fang L, Zhou XJ, Zhao L, Jiang S et al (2009) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study and thermoelectric properties of Al-doped ZnO thin films. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenomena 173:7–11

  29. Banerjee P, Lee WJ, Bae KR, Lee SB, Rubloff GW (2010) Structural, electrical, and optical properties of atomic layer deposition Al-doped ZnO films. J Appl Phys 108:043504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dai HQ, Xu H, Zhou YN et al (2012) Electrochemical characteristics of Al2O3-doped ZnO films by magnetron sputtering. J Phys Chem C 116:1519–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang DX, Zheng YX, Cai QY et al (2012) Thickness-dependence of optical constants for Ta2O5 ultrathin films. Appl Phys A 108:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Forouhi AR, Bloomer I (1986) Phys Rev B 34:7018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu JP, Zhang RJ, Chen ZH et al (2014) Optical properties of epitaxial BiFeO3 thin film grown on SrRuO3-buffered SrTiO3 substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dai ZH, Zhang RJ, Shao J et al (2009) Optical properties of zinc-oxide films determined using spectroscopic ellipsometry with various dispersion models. J Korean Phys Soc 55:1227–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li QH, Zhu DL, Liu WJ et al (2008) Optical properties of Al-doped ZnO thin films by ellipsometry. Appl Surf Sci 254:2922–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fujiwara H, Kondo M (2005) Effects of carrier concentration on the dielectric function of ZnO:Ga and In2O3:Sn studied by spectroscopic ellipsometry: analysis of free-carrier and band-edge absorption. Phys Rev B 71:075109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Burstein E (1954) Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys Rev 93:632–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendez-Gamboa JA, Castro-Rodriguez R, Perez-Quintana IV et al (2016) A figure of merit to evaluate transparent conductor oxides for solar cells using photonic flux density. Thin Solid Films 599:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pradhan AK, Mundle RM, Santiago K, Skuza JR, Xiao B, Song KD, Bahoura M, Cheaito R, Hopkins PE (2014) Extreme tunability in aluminum doped zinc oxide plasmonic materials for near-infrared applications. Sci Rep 4:6415–6420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11174058, 61275160, 11374055, 11674062 and 61575048), the No. 2 National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2011ZX02109-004). Special thanks to Prof. P. F. Wang and Dr. J. Wu for their help of electrical tests, as well as Prof. Z.G. Hu and Dr. M.J. Li for their help of ellipsometry measurement..

Authors’ Contributions

CHZ performed the experiment of the AZO films and drafted the manuscript. RJZ and XC proposed the initial work and finalized the manuscript. YXZ, SYW, and JL participated in the design and coordination of the study. ND and LYC supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rong-Jun Zhang or Xin Chen.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Supporting information. (DOCX 298 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, CH., Zhang, RJ., Chen, X. et al. Effects of Al Doping on the Properties of ZnO Thin Films Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 11, 407 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Al-doped ZnO thin films
  • Atomic layer deposition
  • Optical properties
  • Spectroscopic ellipsometry
  • Electrical properties