Table 1 Average CFE for geometrically optimized As2Sm NFC in As–S system as compared with analogous data for As2Sem NFC in As–Se ChG [30] (best CFE are italicized)
Nanocluster | Z | E f , kcal/mol | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δl = 0 | Δl = 1 | Δl = 2 | Δl = 3 | Δl = 4 | Δl = 5 | Δl = 6 | ||
As–Se system | ||||||||
As2Se3 | 2.40 | 0.31 | ||||||
As2Se4 | 2.33 | −0.76 | ||||||
As2Se5 | 2.29 | −1.05 | −0.95 | |||||
As2Se6 | 2.25 | −2.47 | −1.96 | |||||
As2Se7 | 2.22 | −2.10 | −2.19 | −2.33 | ||||
As–S system | ||||||||
As2S3 | 2.40 | 0.004 | ||||||
As2S4 | 2.33 | −1.06 | ||||||
As2S5 | 2.29 | −0.76 | −1.75 | |||||
As2S6 | 2.25 | −1.43 | −2.25 | |||||
As2S7 | 2.22 | −1.84 | −3.39 | −2.64 | ||||
As2S8 | 2.20 | −3.68 | −2.46 | −3.14 | ||||
As2S9 | 2.18 | −3.57 | −2.30 −2.72 | −3.34 |