 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Optimization of InGaAs/InAlAs Avalanche Photodiodes
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 12, Article number: 33 (2017)
Abstract
In this paper, we report a twodimensional (2D) simulation for InGaAs/InAlAs separate absorption, grading, charge, and multiplication avalanche photodiodes (SAGCM APDs) and study the effect of the charge layer and multiplication layer on the operating voltage ranges of APD. We find that with the increase of the thicknesses as well as the doping concentrations of the charge layer and the multiplication layer, the punchthrough voltage increases; with the increase of the doping concentrations of two layers and the thickness of the charge layer, the breakdown voltage decreases; with the increase of the thickness of the multiplication layer, the breakdown voltage first rapidly declines and then slightly rises.
Background
Focal plane array (FPA) based on In_{0.53}Ga_{0.47}As (referred as InGaAs hereafter) has a huge market and wide application prospect, and it is widely used in military field [1]. For narrow band gap materials like InGaAs, high tunneling current limits their usefulness. Separating the absorption and multiplication layer can overcome this disadvantage [2]. InGaAs is often used to absorb light at a wavelength of 1.55 μm, while for the multiplication layer, In_{0.52}Al_{0.48}As (referred as InAlAs hereafter) is a good multiplication layer material [3]. InAlAs has been demonstrated to be a good electron multiplication material for InGaAs separate absorption and multiplication avalanche photodiodes (SAM APDs) because of its low electron impact ionization threshold energy of 1.9–2.2 eV, high ionization coefficient ratio of electron to hole than that of hole to electron in InP, and small excess noise factor [4, 5].
For separate absorption, grading, charge, and multiplication avalanche photodiodes (SAGCM APDs), the key issue is to adjust the electric field distribution in the device by changing the thickness and doping concentration of the charge layer and the multiplication layer. Provided that the electric field is sufficiently large in the multiplication region, the carriers will undergo avalanche multiplication, and the device behaves as an avalanche photodetectors (APD) as desired [6]. The SAGCM structure allows independent control of the parameters of the charge layer and the multiplication layer (thickness and the doping concentration). In this paper, we study the effect of the charge layer and multiplication layer on the operating voltage ranges of APD and analyze the results theoretically from the internal electric field distribution.
Methods
Figure 1 shows the schematic crosssection of a topilluminated SAGCM InGaAs/InAlAs APD with 400 μm^{2} mesa structure. From the top to the bottom, these layers are sequentially named as contact layer, window layer, absorption layer, grading layer, charge layer, multiplication layer, InAlAs buffer layer, InP buffer layer, and InP substrate. The device structure in our simulation is the same as the experimental device reported in Ref. [7].
The steadystate twodimensional (2D) numerical simulations are performed for the topilluminated SAGCM InGaAs/InAlAs APD by using Silvaco TCAD [8]. The Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH), auger, bandtoband tunneling, and trapassisted tunneling models are used in our simulation. The generation rate G _{bbt} of bandtoband tunnel is described in Eqs. (1) and (2) [8].
The A and B are the characterization parameters; E is the magnitude of electric field, and E _{g} is the band gap energy level. The generation rate R _{tat} in trapassisted tunneling process is given in Eqs. (3)–(5) [8–11].
where τ _{ n } (τ _{ p }) is the electron (hole) lifetime due to the SRH recombination. E _{t} is the trap level, and N _{t} is the trap concentration. E _{i} is the intrinsic Fermi level, and n _{i} is the intrinsic carrier concentration. Γ _{ n } (Γ _{ p }) is the enhancement factor and includes the effects of fieldassisted tunneling on the emission of electrons (holes) from a trap, ΔE _{ n } (ΔE _{ p }) is the energy range where tunneling can occur for electrons (holes), u is the integration variable, and m _{trap} is the effective mass used for carrier tunneling. The effect of carrier avalanche is accounted for by the impact ionization model, which has the following forms:
Where α _{ n,p } are the electron and hole ionization coefficients, respectively, [8, 12, 13]
The parameters above are listed in Table 1.
Results and Discussion
Figure 2 presents the simulated and experimental current–voltage (I–V) characteristics for the topilluminated SAGCM InGaAs/InAlAs APD. The simulated results are in good agreement with the experimental data reported in Ref. [7].
The simulated I–V characteristics at different doping concentrations of the multiplication layer are shown in Fig. 3, the punchthrough voltage (at the unity gain point: the bias where the responsivity of APD reaches ~0.6 A/W) increases monotonically with the increasing of doping concentration (4 × 10^{16} ~ 1.5 × 10^{16} cm^{−3}), [14] while the breakdown voltage (dark current ~ 1 × 10^{−5} A) decreases monotonically. With the change of the doping concentration, the electric field in the multiplication layer changes obviously. We analyze the results theoretically following assumptions and simplifications [15]:

1.
P^{+}–N is an abrupt junction

2.
The doping concentrations in the multiplication, charge, grading and absorption layers are uniform

3.
If the absorption layer is completely depleted at breakdown voltage, x _{s} will be the thickness of the absorption layer
The V _{mesa} is the punchthrough voltage, V _{bi} is the zero bias voltage, and V _{br} is the breakdown voltage; x _{m}, x _{c}, and x _{g} are the thickness of the multiplication, charge, and grading layer, respectively; and σ _{m}, σ _{c}, σ _{g}, and σ _{s} are the charge density in the multiplication, charge, grading, and absorption layer, respectively, σ = N ⋅ x; and ε _{0}, ε _{1}, ε _{2}, and ε _{3} are the dielectric constant of vacuum, InAlAs, InGaAs, InAlGaAs, respectively; F _{br} is the electric field in the multiplication layer at breakdown [13]. To get smaller dark currents, larger breakdown voltage, and larger gain factor, the doping of absorption layer is relatively higher [14]. From Eq. (9), when the absorption layer is not completely depleted at breakdown voltage, x _{s} is the width of the depletion region of the InGaAs absorption layer.
With the decreasing of doping concentration, the electric field between the absorption layer and the grading layer increases, which makes the electron more easier to punch through the absorption layer and the grading layers, so the punchthrough voltage decreases, owing to the wedgeshaped electric field profile with a high gradient [12]. From Fig. 3, we can see that the doping of the multiplication layer has a great influence on the performance of the device.
Figure 4 shows the simulated I–V characteristics with different thicknesses of the multiplication layer (0.05 ~ 0.25 μm). The punchthrough voltage increases with the increasing thickness of multiplication layer, [13] and the breakdown voltage first rapidly declines then slightly rises (Fig. 5). We analyze the results theoretically from Eqs. (8) and (9), and the following equations: [18]
(M _{ n } is the multiplication factor of electron in the multiplication layer)
So, we can get:
(E _{m} is the max electric field intensity in the multiplication layer).
So,
The above equations explain that when the multiplication layer thickness x _{m} is smaller than the critical point \( \frac{\alpha }{\partial \alpha /\partial {x}_{\mathrm{m}}} \), the breakdown voltage declines. When x _{m} is larger than that point, the breakdown voltage slightly rises. The value of the critical point calculated from the Eqs. (10)–(12) is ~ 0.2 μm, which is close to the simulated result in Fig. 5.
From the electric field distribution, with the increasing thickness of multiplication layer, the electric field in the absorption layer and the grading layer decreases, making the electrons more difficult to punch through the layers, so the punchthrough voltage increases. From the simulation results, in order to get a larger operating voltage range, the doping and thickness of the multiplication layer can be 4 × 10^{16} cm^{−3} and 0.05 μm, respectively.
The electric field in the multiplication layer is enhanced by the charge layer to ensure the multiplication effect occurs in the multiplication layer. The thickness and the doping concentration of the charge layer can control the electric field in the multiplication layer. Figure 6 shows the dark and illuminated current characteristics with different doping concentrations (5 × 10^{17} ~ 8 × 10^{17} cm^{−3}). With the increasing of doping concentration, the punchthrough voltage increases and the breakdown voltage decreases. Figure 7 shows the I–V characteristics with different thicknesses of the charge layer, and we can observe that with the increasing thickness, the punchthrough voltage increases while the breakdown voltage decreases [19, 20]. With the increasing thickness and the doping of charge layer, the electric field in the absorption layer and the grading layer decreases, and it makes the electron more difficult to punch through the layers, so the punchthrough voltage increases, but the electric field in multiplication layer increases with the increased thickness and the doping of charge layer. The thickness and doping concentration of the charge layer only affect the voltage distribution in the APD, so with the change of the parameters, the punchthrough voltage and the breakdown voltage change monotonously. Based on the simulation results, to further increase the operating voltage range, the doping and thickness of the charge layer can be 5 × 10^{17} cm^{−3} and 0.065 μm, respectively.
Conclusions
In summary, we simulated and analyzed the punchthrough voltage and the breakdown voltage with the change of the parameters of the charge layer and multiplication layer. We found that with the increase of the thicknesses and the doping concentrations of the charge layer and the multiplication layer, the punchthrough voltage increases; with the increase of the doping concentrations of two layers and the thickness of the charge layer, the breakdown voltage decreases; with the increase of the thickness of the multiplication layer, the breakdown voltage first rapidly declines then slightly rises. Results show that the range of the operating voltage can be changed significantly by the charge layer and multiplication layer.
Abbreviations
 2D:

Twodimensional
 FPA:

Focal plane array
 I–V :

Current–voltage
 SAGCM APDs:

Separate absorption, grading, charge, and multiplication avalanche photodiodes
 SAM APDs:

Separate absorption and multiplication avalanche photodiodes
 SRH:

Shockley–Read–Hall
References
Martyniuk P, Antoszewski J, Martyniuk M et al (2014) New concepts in infrared photodetector designs. Appl Phys Rev 1(4):041102135
Haralson JN, Parks JW, Brennan KF et al. (1997) Numerical simulation of avalanche breakdown within InPInGaAs SAGCM standoff avalanche photodiodes. Lightwave Technol J 15(11):2137–2140
Nakata T, Ishihara J, Makita K et al. (2009) Multiplication noise characterization of InAlAsAPD with heterojunction. Photonics Technol Lett IEEE 21(24):1852–1854
Goh YL, Marshall ARJ, Massey DJ et al (2007) Excess avalanche noise in In_{0.52}Al_{0.48}As. Quantum Electron IEEE J 43(6):503–507
David JPR, Tan CH (2008) Material considerations for avalanche photodiodes. Selected Top Quantum Electron IEEE J 14(4):998–1009
Parks JW, Brennan KF, Tarof LE (1998) Macroscopic Device Simulation of InGaAs/InP Based Avalanche Photodiodes. VLSI Design 6(1–4):79–82
Ma Y, Zhang Y, Gu Y et al. (2015) Tailoring the performances of low operating voltage InAlAs/InGaAs avalanche photodetectors. Opt Express 23(15):19278–19287
Silvaco International (2008) ATLAS User’s manual. Silvaco Internat, Santa Clara
Kocer H, Arslan Y, Besikci C et al. (2012) Numerical analysis of long wavelength infrared HgCdTe photodiodes. Infrared Phys Technol 55(1):49–55
Ferron A, Rothman J, Gravrand O et al. (2013) Modeling of dark current in HgCdTe infrared detectors. Journal of electronic materials 42(11):3303–3308
Ji X, Liu B, Xu Y et al (2013) Deeplevel traps induced dark currents in extended wavelength In_{x}Ga_{1−x}As/InP photodetector. J Appl Phys 114(22):22450215
Qiu WC, Hu WD, Chen L et al. (2015) Dark current transport and avalanche mechanism in HgCdTe electronavalanche photodiodes. Electron devices. IEEE Transactions on 62(6):1926–1931
Wang X, Hu W, Pan M et al (2014) Study of gain and photoresponse characteristics for backilluminated separate absorption and multiplication GaN avalanche photodiodes. J Appl Phys 115(1):01310318
Ma YJ, Zhang YG, Gu Y et al. (2015) Low operating voltage and small gain slope of InGaAs APDs with ptype multiplication layer. Photonics Technol Lett IEEE 27(6):661–664
Ma CLF, Deen MJ, Tarof LE et al. (1995) Temperature dependence of breakdown voltages in separate absorption, grading, charge, and multiplication InP/InGaAs avalanche photodiodes. Electron Devices IEEE Trans 42(5):810–818
Watanabe I, Torikai T, Makita K et al (1990) Impact ionization rates in (100) Al_{0.48}In_{0.52}As. IEEE Electron Device Lett 11(10):437–438
Watanabe I, Torikai T, Taguchi K (1995) Monte Carlo simulation of impact ionization rates in InAlAsInGaAs square and graded barrier superlattice. IEEE J Quantum Electron 31(10):1826–1834
Willardson RK, Beed AC (1977) Semiconductors and semimetals. Academic press, New York
Zhao Y, He S et al. (2006) Multiplication characteristics of InP/InGaAs avalanche photodiodes with a thicker charge layer. Opt Commun 265(2):476–480
Zak D, Jureńczyk J, Kaniewski J et al. (2014) Zener Phenomena in InGaAs/InAlAs/InP Avalanche Photodiodes. Detection 2(2):10–15
Funding
This project is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61307044), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20130321), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20133201120009), the open project of Key Laboratory of Infrared Imaging Materials and Detectors, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IIMDKFJJ1506), the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education of China, and the Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province (SJLX150601).
Authors’ Contributions
JC initiated the research, designed the modeling strategy, and supervised all the work. JC, ZZ, and MZ carried out the simulation and drafted the manuscript. JX and XL contributed to the data analysis. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Zhu, M. et al. Optimization of InGaAs/InAlAs Avalanche Photodiodes. Nanoscale Res Lett 12, 33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167101618159
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167101618159
Keywords
 Avalanche photodiodes (APDs)
 Punchthrough voltage
 Breakdown voltage
 Simulation