Table 1 The calculated results with FEM for the nine proposed models with different configurations of surface morphology
Simulation model serials | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 | #8 | #9 | |
V tot (×106 nm3) | 6.263 | ||||||||
S tot (×106 nm2) | 1.061 | 1.049 | 1.051 | ||||||
L tot (×106 nm) | 0.020 | 0.027 | 0.019 | ||||||
E str (×105 eV) | 4.016 | 4.100 | 4.014 | 4.013 | 4.010 | 4.009 | 4.016 | 4.014 | 4.011 |
ρ str (eV nm−3) | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 |
E surf (×106 eV) | 6.707 | 6.635 | 6.645 | 6.645 | 6.645 | 6.645 | 6.645 | 6.645 | 6.645 |
ρ surf (eV nm−2) | 6.324 | 6.327 | 6.325 | 6.325 | 6.325 | 6.325 | 6.325 | 6.325 | 6.325 |
E str + E surf (×106 eV) | 7.109 | 7.045 | 7.046 | 7.046 | 7.046 | 7.046 | 7.046 | 7.046 | 7.046 |
E edge (×104 eV) | 7.299 | 9.843 | 7.047 | 7.122 | 7.047 | 7.047 | 7.159 | 7.047 | 7.047 |
E tot (×106 eV) | 7.182 | 7.143 | 7.117 | 7.117 | 7.117 | 7.117 | 7.118 | 7.117 | 7.117 |
ρ tot (eV nm−3) | 1.147 | 1.141 | 1.136 | 1.136 | 1.136 | 1.136 | 1.137 | 1.136 | 1.136 |