Open Access

Self-catalyzed Growth of InAs Nanowires on InP Substrate

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:34

Received: 18 October 2016

Accepted: 26 December 2016

Published: 13 January 2017


We report on the self-catalyzed growth of InAs nanowires on InP substrate by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. At a moderate V/III ratio, tapered nanowires are obtained, suggesting a strong surface diffusion effect. Dense twin faults are observed perpendicular to the nanowire growth direction due to the fluctuation of In atoms in the droplet originating from the surface diffusion effect. At a lower V/III ratio, the nanowires exhibit kinking, which is associated with a high adhesion due to a large sticking coefficient of TMIn. The twin faults are dramatically suppressed and even completely eliminated in the NW branch after kinking, which is attributed to a stable In supply with a negligible diffusion effect. This work provides a method for the fabrication of defect-free InAs nanowires.


Nanowires Vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) Kink Self-catalyzed


Recently, III/V nanowires (NWs) have attracted increasing attention for their potential applications in future devices [17]. High-performance NW devices require high quality NWs with controlled morphology and perfect crystal phase. For example, NW solar cells with uniform diameter achieve high conversion efficiency [8]. High-speed field effect transistors require twin-faults-free NWs avoiding from electron trapping [9]. InAs NWs are particularly promising for high-performance electronic and optoelectronic devices due to the high electron mobility and broad spectra response. However, the control of the morphology and crystal phase of InAs NWs still remains a challenge. Particularly, stacking faults and twin defects are commonly observed in InAs NWs, which dramatically limit their applications in high-performance devices [10, 11]. Up to date, defect-free III-V NWs have been mainly obtained by controlling the growth conditions, varying the catalyst size, as well as changing the substrate orientation [1214]. Besides, single-crystalline crystal structure has also been obtained in tilted or kinked NWs. For example, tilted Ge, ZnSe, and GaAs NWs have been reported to be SFs-free [1517]. Pure zincblende (ZB) phase has been obtained in GaAs, InP, and Ge NWs after kinking [1821]. The tilted or kinked NWs typically have a low-index orientation, which favors pure ZB phase. However, the research on tilted or kinked InAs NWs is still limited. Moreover, most of the reported InAs NWs are grown via Au-catalyzed method, which may lead to an unintentional Au contamination and degrade the device performance. In this paper, we demonstrate the growth of InAs NWs on InP substrate by self-catalyzed growth method. NWs are grown under different temperature and V/III ratio. Twin-free NWs are obtained via a spontaneous kinking, and the related mechanism is discussed.


The growth was carried out in a Thomas Swan close-coupled showerhead-metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (CCS-MOCVD) reactor at the pressure of 100 Torr. Before NW growth, an InP (111)B substrate was placed in the reactor and annealed in situ at 645 °C in phosphine ambient for desorption of surface contaminants. Trimethylindium (TMIn) and arsine (AsH3) were used as precursors. Hydrogen served as the carrier gas. In droplets were formed by switching off PH3 and depositing TMIn for 45 s at 390 °C. Then, TMIn precursor was switched off for 10 s of soak time. InAs NWs growth began when TMIn and AH3 were introduced again into the reaction chamber simultaneously. The input V/III ratio was adjusted by varying the AsH3 flow while keeping the TMIn flow constant at 32 μmol/min. After growth, the samples were cooled down in H2 ambient. Four samples were grown in the experiment. Samples A, B, and C were grown for 900 s at a V/III ratio of 35 and growth temperature of 420, 400, and 380 °C, respectively. Sample D was grown for 900 s at a V/III ratio of 18 and growth temperature of 380 °C.

The morphological and structural characteristics of the samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Individual NWs for TEM observations were prepared by ultrasonicating the samples in ethanol for 5 min, followed by spreading drops from the suspension onto a holey carbon/Cu grid.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a–c shows the cross-sectional SEM images of samples A, B, and C, respectively. All the NWs are vertical to the substrate, suggesting the <111> growth direction. Tapering is observed in all the three samples, indicative of the adatom diffusion during the NW growth. In comparison with sample C, samples A and B grown at higher temperature are more tapered, which is attributed to an enhanced diffusion of In adatoms from the substrate to the droplet [22]. The average length of NWs for samples A, B, and C is 0.63, 1.26, and 2.62 μm, corresponding to a growth rate of 0.7, 1.4, and 2.9 nm/s, respectively. The decreased growth rate with the increasing temperature is contrary to the traditional vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) growth that the growth rate usually increases with the increasing temperature due to the thermally activated behavior. This can be attributed to a decreased supply of In adatoms from the substrate due to an enhanced competition. The average diameter of the NW bottom for samples A, B, and C is measured to be 645, 501, and 270 nm, respectively, suggesting an enhanced radial growth as the temperature increases. As the NWs become thicker, the spacing between NWs becomes smaller. The competition of neighboring NWs for the In species on the substrate is enhanced due to an decreased collection area, resulting in a slower growth rate due to a decreased supply of In adatoms from the substrate [23].
Fig. 1

Cross-sectional SEM images of the InAs NWs from sample A, B, and C. The scale bars in (ac) are 100, 200, and 1 μm, respectively

Figure 2 shows the cross-sectional SEM image of sample D. Different from the straight NWs in samples A, B, and C, kink is observed in some of the NWs, resulting in a change of growth direction. The kink phenomenon is attributed to a reduced V/III ratio. In the self-catalyzed InAs NW growth, the In droplet acts as the catalyst. With decreasing the V/III ratio, the sticking coefficient of TMIn increases and more In sticks to the surface. A high In content is expected to lower the liquid–vapor surface tension and thereby increase the work of adhesion. When the work of adhesion is high enough, a small perturbation (e.g., fluctuation of temperature or gas flow) is sufficient to change the form of the NW tip. In addition, the low surface energy (111) sidewalls are favorable for the droplet to wet. Under these combined conditions, when the faceted structure forms with a shrinking growth surface, the liquid droplet is easy to unpin, moving onto a sidewall (111) facet, and thus to continue to grow, forming a kink [24].
Fig. 2

Cross-sectional SEM images of the InAs NWs from sample D. The scale bar is 1 μm

Figure 3 shows the TEM image of a single NW from sample C. A large number of twin faults are observed from the selective area electron diffraction (SAED), which have been widely reported in self-catalyzed InAs NWs [25, 26]. The twin faults usually occur with a transition of external facets during the nucleation formation and the free energy of the nucleus formation depends on the contact angle of the liquid droplet with respect to the solid–vapor facet [27]. Thus, the orientation of each critical nucleus determines whether a normal or a twin plane will form. As the energy difference between the normal and twin nucleus is small, small energy fluctuations during growth could give rise to randomly distributed twin planes. In this case, the sidewall facet perpendicular to the growth direction is {112}. {112} planes have a relatively high surface energy and can be considered as two {111} layers followed by a “correcting” step. The angle between the surfaces parallel to the NW growth direction is 38° (as shown in Fig. 3b), corresponding to {111}A and {111}B surfaces [28]. (The subscript “A” and “B” refers to “In” and “As” terminated surfaces, respectively.)
Fig. 3

a Low magnification TEM image of a single NW from sample C. The inset shows the SAED of the NW taken along the <110> zone axis. b HRTEM image of the NW with twinning defects. The scale bars in a and b are 500 and 10 nm, respectively

Figure 4 shows the TEM images of two kinds of NWs from sample D. Figure 4a shows a NW with an angle of 90° between the root and branch. The orientation of the branch is determined to be <112> according to the SAED. Figure 4b shows the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image between the droplet and NW. The branch exhibits zincblende (ZB) crystal structure despite several twins parallel with the growth direction of the branch. The twin formation probably occurs during the NW nucleation. As the NW continues to grow, the twins extend down the length of the NW. The twins form during the nucleation when the NW grows in the <111> direction and provide preferential addition sites that subsequently maintain the NW growth in the {112} direction. Compared with the twin faults perpendicular to the growth direction, the twin faults along the growth direction has smaller carrier scattering which has tiny influence on the mobility of NWs.
Fig. 4

a Low magnification TEM image of a single NW from sample D. The inset shows the SAED of the NW after kinking taken along the <110> zone axis. b HRTEM image of the NW. The inset shows the FFT image of the white marked area. The <112> growth direction can be observed in the FFT image. c Low magnification TEM image of another single NW from sample D. The inset shows the SAED of the NW after kinking taken along the <110> zone axis. d HRTEM image of the NW. The inset shows the FFT image of the white marked area. The <111> growth direction can be observed in the FFT image. The scale bars in (ad) are 500, 20, 500, and 10 nm, respectively

Figures 4c, d shows another kind of NWs from sample D. The growth direction is determined to be <111> according to the SAED. The branch after kinking exhibits defect-free ZB crystal structure without twins. The kink angle ranges from 70° to 137°, which has no relationship with the crystal orientation. This means that the kink is originating from other perturbation such as the In concentration fluctuation due to the surface diffusion rather than the stacking twins during the nucleation. It should be noted that the growth orientation of the branch will not change when the growth time is further prolonged.

It has been reported that the twin defects typically occurs with a transition of the external facets, and the transition takes place under the influence of the concentration in the droplet. The As species reach the growth point only by direct impingement, but the In species mainly come from direct impingement and surface diffusion from the substrate. In our experiment, as the growth parameters remain unchanged during the NW growth, the In species in the droplet from direct impingement is constant, but the In species collected from the substrate decrease with the NW height. Thus, the fluctuation of In species from the substrate contributes to the twin faults in the <111> root. When the NW grows to a certain height, kink occurs due to a small perturbation of growth conditions. Although the perturbation remains unclear, a sudden change of In concentration in the droplet may play an important role in the kink. That is, In diffusion from the substrate suddenly decreases, resulting in a sharp decrease of In atoms in the droplet. After kinking, the diffusion from the substrate becomes negligible and the direct impingement dominates. The stable supply of In species contributes to the pure crystal structure of the NW after kinking. The explanation can be supported by the TEM images in Fig. 4a, c, in which the NW roots are obviously tapered while the branch after kinking are uniform in diameter, suggesting that the diffusion effect is negligible after kinking.


In conclusion, we demonstrate the self-catalyzed growth of InAs NWs on InP substrate by MOCVD. At a low V/III ratio, the NWs exhibit kinking, which is attributed to a high adhesion due to a large sticking coefficient of TMIn. The twin faults are dramatically suppressed and even completely eliminated in the NW branch after kinking, which is attributed to a stable In supply with a negligible diffusion effect. The twin-free InAs NWs are promising for high-performance electronic and photonic devices.







Selective area electron diffraction


Scanning electron microscopy


Transmission electron microscopy







This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61376019, 6141101100, and 61504010), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4142038), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015-RC13), and the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communication (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), P. R. China

Authors’ Contributions

BL fabricated the InAs NWs and drafted the manuscript. XY conceived and designed the structure. XZ, XR, and XY reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications


  1. Dai X, Zhang S, Wang Z, Adamo G, Liu H, Huang Y, Couteau C, Soci C (2014) GaAs/AlGaAs nanowire photodetector. Nano Lett 14(5):2688–2693View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tsakalakos L, Balch J, Fronheiser J, Korevaar BA, Sulima O, Rand J (2007) Silicon nanowire solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 91:233117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Piccione B, Cho C, Vugt LK, Agarwal R (2012) All-optical active switching in individual semiconductor nanowires. Nat Nanotechnol 7:640–645View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pan C, Dong L, Zhu G, Niu S, Yu R, Yang Q, Liu Y, Wang Z (2013) High-resolution electroluminescent imaging of pressure distribution using a piezoelectric nanowire LED array. Nat Photonics 7(84):752–758View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Thonga LV, Hoaa ND, Lea DTT, Vieta DT, Tamb PD, Leb A, Hieu NV (2010) On-chip fabrication of SnO2-nanowire gas sensor: the effect of growth time on sensor performance. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 146(1):361–367View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Vitiello MS, Coquillat D, Viti L, Ercolani D, Teppe F, Pitanti A, Beltram F, Sorba L, Knap W, Tredicucci A (2012) Room-temperature terahertz detectors based on semiconductor nanowire field-effect transistors. Nano Lett 12(1):96–102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Patolsky F, Zheng G, Lieber CM (2006) Nanowire sensors for medicine and the life sciences. Future Med 1(1):51–65Google Scholar
  8. Wallentin J, Anttu N, Asoli D, Huffman M, Åberg I, Magnusson MH, Siefer G, Fuss-Kailuweit P, Dimroth F, Witzigmann B, Xu HQ, Samuelson L, Deppert K, Borgström MT (2013) InP nanowire array solar cells achieving 13.8% efficiency by exceeding the ray optics limit. Science 339(6123):1057–1060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schroer MD, Petta JR (2010) Correlating the nanostructure and electronic properties of InAs nanowires. Nano Lett 10(5):1618–1622View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhara S, Solanki HS RAP, Singh V, Sengupta S, Chalke BA, Dhar A, Gokhale M, Bhattacharya A, Deshmukh MM (2011) Tunable thermal conductivity in defect engineered nanowires at low temperatures. Phys Rev B 84:121307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sourribes MJL, Isakov I, Panfilova M, Liu H, Warburton PA (2014) Mobility enhancement by Sb-mediated minimisation of stacking fault density in InAs nanowires grown on silicon. Nano Lett 14(3):1643–1650View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Joyce HJ, Wong-Leung J, Gao Q, Tan HH, Jagadish C (2010) Phase perfection in zinc blende and wurtzite III−V nanowires using basic growth parameters. Nano Lett 10(3):908–915View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Grap T, Rieger T, Blömers C, Schäpers T, Grützmacher D, Lepsa MI (2013) Self-catalyzed VLS grown InAs nanowires with twinning superlattices. Nanotechnology 24(33):335601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick KA, Caroff P, Bolinsson J, Messing ME, Johansson J, Deppert K, Wallenberg LR, Samuelson L (2010) Control of III–V nanowire crystal structure by growth parameter tuning. Semicond Sci Technol 25(2):024009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu ZH, Mei X, Kim D, Blumin M, Ruda HE, Liu JQ, Kavanagh KL (2003) Growth, branching, and kinking of molecular-beam epitaxial <110> GaAs nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 83(16):3368–3370View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yan X, Zhang X, Li J, Wu Y, Ren X (2015) Self-catalyzed growth of pure zinc blende 110 InP nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 107:023101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang J, Plissard SR, Verheijen MA, Feiner L, Cavalli A, Bakkers EPAM (2013) Reversible switching of InP nanowire growth direction by catalyst engineering. Nano Lett 13(8):3802–3806View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Geaney H, Dickinson C, Weng W, Kiely CJ, Barrett CA, Gunning RD, Ryan KM (2011) Role of Defects and growth directions in the formation of periodically twinned and kinked unseeded germanium nanowires. Cryst Growth Des 11(7):3266–3272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Adhikari H, Marshall AF, Chidsey CED, McIntyre PC (2006) Germanium nanowire epitaxy: shape and orientation control. Nano Lett 6(2):318–323View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cai Y, Chan SK, Sou IK, Chan YF, Su DS, Wang N (2006) The size-dependent growth direction of ZnSe nanowires. Adv Mater 18:109–114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shtrikman H, Popovitz-Biro R, Kretnin A, Houben L, Heiblum BM, Galicka M, Buczko R, Kacman P (2009) Method for suppression of stacking faults in Wurtzite III−V nanowires. Nano Lett 9(4):1506–1510View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Shin JC, Kim DY, Lee A, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Choi WJ, Kim HS, Choi KJ (2013) Improving the composition uniformity of Au-catalyzed InGaAs nanowires on silicon. J Cryst Growth 372:15–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Persson AI, Fröberg LE, Jeppesen S, Björk MT, Samuelson L (2007) Surface diffusion effects on growth of nanowires by chemical beam epitaxy. J Appl Phys 101:034313View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Paiman S, Gao Q, Tan H, Jagadish C, Pemasiri K, Montazeri M, Jackson HE, Smith LM, Yarrison-Rice JM, Zhang X, Zou J (2009) The effect of V/III ratio and catalyst particle size on the crystal structure and optical properties of InP nanowires. Nanotechnology 20(22):225606View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Forbes D, Hubbard S, Raffaelle R, McNatt JS (2010) Au-catalyst-free epitaxy of InAs nanowires. J Cryst Growth 312(8):1391–1395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang J, Shin JC (2014) Investigation of p-type InAs nanowires grown via Au-assisted and self-assembled methods. J Korean Phys Soc 64(11):1621–1625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Algra RE, Verheijen MA, Feiner L, Immink GGW, Theissmann R, Enckevort WJP, Vlieg E, Bakkers EPAM (2010) Paired twins and {112} morphology in GaP nanowires. Nano Lett 10(7):2349–2356View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Davidson FM III, Lee DC, Fanfair DD, Korgel BA (2007) Lamellar twinning in semiconductor nanowires. J Phys Chem C 111(7):2929–2935View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017