Open Access

Self-Consistent Charge Density Functional Tight-Binding Study of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly(styrenesulfonate) Ammonia Gas Sensor

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:90

Received: 5 October 2016

Accepted: 30 January 2017

Published: 6 February 2017


Geometric and electronic properties of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), styrene sulfonate (SS), and EDOT: SS oligomers up to 10 repeating units were studied by the self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB) method. An application of PEDOT:PSS for ammonia (NH3) detection was highlighted and investigated both experimentally and theoretically. The results showed an important role of H-bonds in EDOT:SS oligomers complex conformation. Electrical conductivity of EDOT increased with increasing oligomers and doping SS due to enhancement of π conjugation. Printed PEDOT:PSS gas sensor exhibited relatively high response and selectivity to NH3. The SCC-DFTB calculation suggested domination of direct charge transfer process in changing of PEDOT:PSS conductivity upon NH3 exposure at room temperature. The NH3 molecules preferred to bind with PEDOT:PSS via physisorption. The most favorable adsorption site for PEDOT:PSS-NH3 interaction was found to be at the nitrogen atom of NH3 and hydrogen atoms of SS with an average optimal binding distance of 2.00 Å.


PEDOT:PSS Conducting polymers Ammonia gas sensor SCC-DFTB QM/MD simulation


Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) is one of the most promising π-conjugated polymers. Because of its unique properties such as low redox potential [1], low band gap (1.5–1.6 eV) [2], and good stability (below 150 °C) [3], PEDOT can be used in several applications such as transparent electrodes [4, 5], printing circuit boards [6, 7], OLED displays [8, 9], solar cell [10, 11], and textile fibers [12]. To improve the solubility and conductivity of PEDOT, poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS) as a dispersant and a charge-balancing dopant is usually doped into PEDOT during the polymerization [10, 1316]. Combination of PEDOT and PSS (PEDOT:PSS) provides the enhanced electrical conductivity (1–10 S•cm−1) with solubility in water which allows the conductive polymer to be easily-processed as an electronic ink for practical applications in field of printed electronics [17].

In theoretical studies, structural and electronic properties of PEDOT and PEDOT:PSS have been investigated by many research groups, i.e., Dkhissi et al. used ab initio Hartree–Fock (HF/6-31G) and density functional theory (DFT/6-31G) methods to exhibit relative stability of the aromatic and quinoid forms of neutral PEDOT in the ground state [18, 19]. Aleman et al. reported structural and electronic properties of n-EDOT with n = 1–8 [20]. Lenz et al. studied the influence of the degree of doping on the reflectivity and optical properties of PEDOT:PSS based on GGA PW91 functional [14]. Very recently, Gangopadhyay investigated the nature of the interaction between PEDOT and PSS using B3LYP/6-31G** [21]. However, to our best knowledge, there has been no report on theoretical studies of PEDOT:PSS for ammonia sensing applications.

Ammonia (NH3) is highly toxic gas that is naturally existed in the atmosphere at low-ppb to sub-ppb levels. It can be widely used in various applications such as production of fertilizer and chemicals, refrigeration systems, and clinical diagnosis [22]. However, at high concentration of NH3, it can cause irritation the skin, eyes, nose, throat to respiratory tract due to its corrosive properties. Exposure to a massive concentration of NH3 (>5000 ppm) may be fatal within minutes. Therefore, detection of NH3 has attracted much attention for environment protection and human health. Recently, several research groups have reported the fabrication of NH3 gas sensors based on inorganic, organic and hybrid materials. For example, Pang et al. synthesized cellulose/TiO2/PANI composite nanofibers by electrospinning and polymerization for NH3 detection at room temperature [23]. The response value of the composite nanofibers to 250 ppm NH3 was found to be 6.335. Zhang et al. fabricated MoS2/ZnO nanocomposite film sensor by layer-by-layer self-assembly technique. The MoS2/ZnO nanocomposite film exhibited a high sensitivity to NH3 with a normalized response value of 24.38% in gas concentration of 5 ppm at room temperature [24]. Moon et al. prepared Co3O4–SWCNT nanocomposites by arc-discharge method [25]. The Co3O4-SWCNT sensor was investigated to various reducing gases such as H2S, NH3, H2, and CH4. At the optimum operating temperature of 250 °C, the response value of Co3O4-SWCNT sensor was ~50% for 100 ppm NH3 detection. Other current materials for NH3 sensing application were summarized in Table 1. Although some materials with specific preparation methods exhibited excellent sensing performances towards NH3, most of them did not support the preparation of sensing film on flexible substrate that is one of serious problems for future wearable gas sensing application. In addition, each of these methods suffers from several disadvantages such as high cost, high complexity, long operating time for sensing film preparation and high operating temperature in gas detection. Therefore, the development of NH3 gas sensors on flexible substrate with high sensitivity, simplicity, low temperature processing, high productivity, low-cost, low material waste and room operating temperature for NH3 detection is still an important task for low-cost high-performance wearable gas sensors. In this work, we have fabricated a PEDOT:PSS NH3 gas sensor based on inkjet printing method. Theoretical studies of PEDOT:PSS for NH3 detection have been performed for the first time by using Self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB). The most favorite site of NH3 adsorption on PEDOT:PSS have been systematically investigated. It should be noted that the SCC-DFTB method was derived from DFT by neglect, approximation, and parametrization of interaction integrals. It offers several advantages including rapid computation of large scale molecular systems (several thousands of atoms), reliable description of dispersions and weak interactions (Van der Waals and H-bonding), and good prediction for properties (geometry, electronics, and binding energies) [2628]. Moreover, the SCC-DFTB method was used for investigation of NH3 adsorption on sensing material, which is consistent with experimental observations [29]. The SCC-DFTB was therefore selected for PEDOT:PSS theoretical studies on NH3 sensing application for this work.
Table 1

Comparison of sensing materials for NH3 detection in the literatures with the present work

Sensing material

Gas response


Operating temperature


Reduce graphene oxide

0.64% (ΔR/R0)


22 °C


Silver Nanocrystal-MWCNTs

~9% (ΔR/R0)

10,000 (1%)




2.3% (Δρ/ρair)




ZnO nanorods

10.1 (Ra/Rg)


~300 °C



1.74 (Ra/Rg)


200 °C


Co3O4 crossed nanosheet (CNS)

5.6 (Rg/Ra)


111 °C


Pristine PEDOT:PSS

4.08% (ΔR/R0)



This work


SCC-DFTB Method and Models of PEDOT:PSS

The SCC-DFTB method is based on a second-order expansion of the DFT energy with respect to density fluctuations around a reference density [30]. The SCC-DFTB utilizes the Kohn-Sham orbitals with the optimized linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) Slater-type valence electron basis set. The total energy of SCC-DFTB can be written as
$$ {E}_{SCC- DFTB}={\displaystyle \sum_{i\mu \nu}{c}_{\mu}^i}{c}_v^i{H}_{\mu v}^0+{\displaystyle \sum_{A> B}{E}_{A B}^{rep}}+\frac{1}{2}{\displaystyle \sum_{A B}{\gamma}_{A B}\varDelta {q}_A}\varDelta {q}_B $$
Where μ and ν denote atomic orbitals, A and B denote atoms, \( {c}_{\mu}^i \) are the expansion coefficients of molecular orbitals, \( {H}_{\mu v}^0 \) is unperturbed Hamiltonian, \( {E}_{AB}^{rep} \) is the two-body repulsive energy term, Δq A and Δq b are the induced charge on each atom A and B, respectively, and γ AB is a distance-dependent function describing charge interactions.
Regarding SCC-DFTB, this method has been called as a “basis-set independent” method [31, 32]. There are no integrals calculated in the DFTB method, thus there cannot be a basis set superposition error (BSSE). In addition, different basis sets are usually derived for electronic and repulsive potential parameters, the effects of BSSE on PEDOT:PSS-NH3 interactions is therefore neglected for this study. The bond lengths, bond angle, and torsion angle of PEDOT and PSS are defined as shown in Fig. 1. To verify the accuracy of the SCC-DFTB method, the structure and electronic properties of PEDOT, PSS, and PEDOT:PSS (n = 1 to 3) obtained from SCC-DFTB method implemented on DFTB+ [33] in conjunction with the mio-0-1 parameter set [30, 34] were compared with density functional theory [35] at B3LYP/6-31G*[36, 37] level using GAMESS [38]. It should be noted that B3LYP can be well used for the description of the geometric and electronic structures of π-conjugated polymers [18, 19, 21]. However, it fails to accurately represent dispersion/weak non-covalent interactions. This leads to a serious limitation for investigation of PEDOT:PSS-NH3 interactions. The B3LYP was thus employed to study the geometric and electronic properties of PEDOT:PSS only. After validation of the SCC-DFTB accuracy, PEDOT, PSS, and PEDOT:PSS up to n =10 were fully optimized and studied based on SCC-DFTB calculation. Geometries were optimized until the atomic forces were less than 1.0 × 10−4 Hartree/Bohr. The SCC tolerance was set to 10–6 au. The electron temperature was kept to 1000 K in order to improve SCC convergence and include the effect of thermal electronic excitation [39, 40].
Fig. 1

Molecular structures of a EDOT and b SS oligomers

QM/MD Simulation of EDOT:SS in Ammonia

The QM/MM simulation was performed under canonical ensemble. The system consists one EDOT:SS molecule and 250 NH3 molecules in a periodic cubic box of 16.38 × 16.38 × 16.38 nm3 as shown in Fig. 2. Total numbers of atoms in the simulation box were 1034 atoms. A target nuclear temperature of 298 K was maintained using a Berendsen thermostat [41]. The equations of motion were integrated using the Velocity Verlet algorithm [42] with an integration time step of 1 fs. The total simuation time were 100 ps.
Fig. 2

Simulation snapshot of EDOT:SS monomer in NH3 molecules at 298 K

Fabrication of PEDOT:PSS Gas Sensor

The PEDOT:PSS aqueous solution (Clevios™ P VP AI 4083, solid content 1.3–1.7%, PEDOT:PSS weight ratio = 1:6) was purchased from Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co., KG and used without any further purification. A PEDOT:PSS NH3 gas sensor was fabricated based on ink-jet printing method [17]. Briefly, interdigitated electrodes with 1-mm interdigit spacing were deposited on PET flexible substrate by screen printing of silver conductive paste. The aqueous PEDOT:PSS was mixed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycol (EG) and triton x-100 in order to improve conductivity, viscosity and surface tension. The mixed PEDOT:PSS electronic ink was then deposited on interdigitated electrodes by a modified ink-jet printer. The thickness of PEDOT:PSS sensing film could be controlled by varying the number of printed layers. The fabricated PEDOT:PSS gas sensor was tested with ammonia, acetone, ethanol, methanol, and toluene at 500 ppm concentration to assess the response and selectivity of the sensor. All experiments were performed at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) and the relative humidity of 58 ± 2%. Gas response of PEDOT:PSS gas sensor is defined as
$$ S\left(\%\right)=\left(\frac{R_{\mathrm{gas}}-{R}_{\mathrm{air}}}{R_{\mathrm{air}}}\times 100\right), $$
where R air and R gas are the sensor resistance in pure air and in test gas, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Structural and Electronic Properties of PEDOT:PSS

List of bond lengths, bond angle, and torsion angle of EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS oligomers (n = 1–3) obtained at the SCC-DFTB and DFT methods is given in Additional file 1: Table S1–S3 in the supplementary data section. Root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) of bond lengths, bond angle and torsion angle of optimized structures (n = 1 to 3 units) between SCC-DFTB and B3LYP/6-31G* methods are shown in Table 2. The RMSD values were calculated by a simple equation; \( RMSD=\sqrt{\frac{{\displaystyle \sum }{\left({X}_{DFTB}-{X}_{B3 LYP}\right)}^2}{n}} \), where XDFTB and XB3LYP are structural properties obtained by SCC-DFTB and B3LYP/6-31G* methods, respectively. It appears that these differences are quite small. The SCC-DFTB geometry is in good agreement with DFT method while calculation time of SCC-DFTB is ~1000 times faster than conventional DFT. To study the geometry of EDOT, SS, and EDOT:SS with increasing oligomers, it is found that average bond lengths of thiophene, quinonoid and benzenoid rings do not change significantly up to 10 oligomers (see Additional file 1: Table S1-S4 in the Supplementary data section). The optimized structures of EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS with n = 10 are displayed in Fig. 3. In EDOT:SS oligomers, the sulfonate functional groups of SS oligomers tends to interact with the EDOT oligomers. The H atoms of EDOT are closest to the O atoms of SS oligomers in all n units (n = 1–10). It indicates an important role of H-bonds formation (dash lines in Fig. 3c) in EDOT:SS oligomers. The average closest distance between EDOT and SS oligomers is found to be approximately 2.14 Å based on SCC-DFTB method. However, it should be noted that electrostatic interactions also dominate conformation of EDOT:SS oligomers. At 10-EDOT:SS oligomers, strong positive charges occurred at sulfurs atoms of SS oligomers are in range of 1.49e–1.56e while oxygen atoms of EDOT contribute average negative charges of 0.28 |e|. The existence of repulsive interactions between the sulfur atoms and attractive interactions between EDOT and SS oligomers cause a non-planar conformation in PEDOT:PSS chain structure. With increasing chain length, PEDOT:PSS exhibits coil-like conformation corresponding to the study by Gangopadhyay et al. [21] based on DFT calculation and experimental investigation by Kim et al. [43]
Table 2

Root mean square deviations (RMSD) of bond lengths, bond angle and torsion angle of optimized EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS structures (n = 1 to 3 units) between SCC-DFTB and B3LYP/6-31G* methods


n = 1

n = 2

n = 3

Bond length (Å)




Bond angle (°)




Torsion angle (°)




Fig. 3

Optimized structures of a EDOT, b SS, and c EDOT:SS oligomers with n = 10 units based on SCC-DFTB calculation

The HOMO, LUMO and energy gap (εg) of EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS with n = 1–3 units based on B3LYP/6-31G* and SCC-DFTB methods are shown in Table 3. One can be seen that the εg of EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS (n = 1–3 units) predicted by the SCC-DFTB is less than that of B3LYP/6-31G* about 1.31–3.49 eV. Although there is a big difference εg prediction, the SCC-DFTB still yields values directly comparable with experimental results. For EDOT with eight units, B3LYP/6-31G* estimated the εg of 2.75 eV [20] while SCC-DFTB predicts the εg of 1.17 eV (see Fig. 4) which is in good agreement with experimental investigations (1.5–1.7 eV) [2, 4446]. The HOMO and LUMO energies for EDOT, SS, and EDOT:SS with n = 1–10 units based on SCC-DFTB method are reported in Additional file 1: Table S5 in the supplementary data section.
Table 3

HOMO, LUMO and energy gap (εg) in eV of EDOT, SS and EDOT:SS with n = 1–3 units obtained by B3LYP/6-31G* and SCC-DFTB methods













































































Fig. 4

Variation of energy gaps of EDOT, SS, and EDOT:SS oligomers obtained by SCC-DFTB method

The HOMO and LUMO energies can imply to the ionization potential and electron affinities, respectively [47]. For EDOT oligomers, the HOMO and LUMO energies increase and decrease, respectively, with increasing oligomers (n). These cause from an increase of π conjugation resulting to increase of electrical conductivity when number of oligomers increase (see Fig. 4). In case of SS oligomers, HOMO and LUMO energies do not increase/decrease linearly. These may come from variety of sulfonate functional groups conformation of SS oligomers. For EDOT:SS oligomers, it clearly shows enhancement of electrical conductivity in all n as shown in Fig. 4. At n = 10, the εg of EDOT:SS is 0.35 eV which is three times greater than that of pristine EDOT (1.08 eV). The electrons prefer to transfer from EDOT to SS oligomers ranging from 0.007 to 0.444 |e| with increasing oligomers (n).

Sensing Property of PEDOT:PSS Gas Sensor

The gas response of pristine PEDOT:PSS gas sensor to various volatile organic compound (VOCs) such as toluene, methanol, ethanol, acetone, and ammonia at room temperature is displayed in Fig. 5. It clearly shows that the pristine PEDOT:PSS gas sensor exhibited relatively high response and selectivity to ammonia compared with other VOCs. The gas responses to NH3, acetone, methanol, ethanol, and toluene were 4.08, 2.41, 0.77, 0.58, and 0.49%, respectively. Sensing mechanism of PEDOT:PSS sensor to ammonia can be explained via direct charge transfer process and swelling process [17]. In this work, only direct charge transfer process has been investigated in depth based on SCC-DFTB method. The results will be discussed in the next section.
Fig. 5

Gas response of the pristine PEDOT:PSS gas sensor to 500 ppm concentration of various VOCs at room temperature

QM/MD Simulation

In order to study the tendency and behavior of NH3 orientation toward PEDOT:PSS, the QM/MD simulation of a EDOT:SS in 250 NH3 molecules was performed in a periodic box at room temperature. Last 50 ps simulation times were used for radial distribution function (RDF) analysis. The RDFs from the atoms of EDOT to the H and N atoms of NH3 molecules are shown in Fig. 6a and b, respectively. One can be seen that NH3 molecules prefer to localize at H atoms of EDOT molecule with the first RDFs peaks of 1.94 and 2.04 Å for H and N atoms of NH3 molecules, respectively. In case of SS, the probability of finding NH3 molecules surrounding the O atoms of SS is higher than that of the other atoms as displayed in Fig. 6c and d. Based on the first RDFs peaks, the H atoms of NH3 molecules turn toward the O atoms of SS at the position of 1.91 Å and the N atoms of NH3 tends toward the H atoms of SS at the position of 2.30 Å. The results suggest that NH3 molecules interact with both EDOT and SS and favor to bind at the sites of O and H atoms. To better understand the binding distances and interaction energies between EDOT:SS and NH3, four configurations (see Fig. 7) extracted from the first RDFs peaks were re-calculated with SCC-DFTB energy calculation including van der Waals dispersion corrections [48, 49]. The interaction energy (Eint) can be calculated by the following equation:
$$ {E}_{\mathrm{int}}={E}_{tot}\left(\mathrm{EDOT}:\mathrm{SS}+{\mathrm{NH}}_3\ \right)-{E}_{tot}\left(\mathrm{EDOT}:\mathrm{SS}\right)-{E}_{tot}\left({\mathrm{NH}}_3\right), $$
where Etot(EDOT:SS+ NH3), Etot (EDOT:SS) and Etot (NH3) are the total energies of the EDOT:SS with NH3, individual EDOT:SS and individual NH3, respectively.
Fig. 6

RDFs (gx-y(r)) between atoms of EDOT to a H atoms, b N atoms of NH3, atoms of SS to c H atoms, and d N atoms of NH3 molecules

Fig. 7

Orientations of NH3 molecules around EDOT:SS based on the first RDFs peaks

The interaction energy between EDOT:SS and NH3 at different adsorption sites and NH3 orientation configurations is shown in Fig. 8. The HSS-NNH3 configuration exhibits the highest interaction energy (6.596 kcal/mol) with the binding distance of 2.00 Å. This result suggests that the NH3 molecules prefers to interact with EDOT:SS via the lone pair on the N atom at H atoms of EDOT:SS. At this adsorption site, electron charge transfer was found to be from the NH3 molecule to the EDOT:SS (0.032 e). The holes of EDOT:SS interact with the electron-donating NH3. The delocalization degree of conjugated π electrons of EDOT:SS is increased by charge transfer from the adsorbed NH3 molecules. Formation of a neutral polymer backbone occurs and leads to decrease in charge carriers of EDOT:SS. It causes the increase in resistance of EDOT:SS in present of NH3. This behavior is in good agreement with our experimental results as shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 8

EDOT:SS-NH3 interaction energies at different adsorption sites and configurations as a function of the distance (d)


The PEDOT:PSS conductive polymer for NH3 detection was investigated both experimentally and theoretically. The structural and electronic properties of PEDOT:PSS oligomers were studied based on SCC-DFTB method and compared with B3LYP/6-31 g*. Calculations indicated that SCC-DFTB is indeed capable of reproducing the DFT-predicted features of PEDOT:PSS conductive polymer system (C-S-O-H bonding). Non-planar conformation in PEDOT:PSS chain structure naturally occur due to the existence of repulsive interactions between the sulfur atoms and H-bond attractive interactions between EDOT and SS oligomers. The EDOT behaves as an electron donor for EDOT: SS composites. The electrical conductivity of EDOT increases with increasing oligomers and doping SS. The energy gap of EDOT: SS with 10 oligomers was found to be 0.35 eV based on SCC-DFTB. The printed PEDOT:PSS gas sensor exhibited good response and selective to NH3 at room temperature over VOCs such as toluene, methanol, ethanol, and acetone. Theoretical investigation showed interaction between NH3 and EDOT: SS via physisorption. The H atoms of SS are the most favorable adsorption site of NH3. Direct charge transfer process dominants changing in conductivity of EDOT:SS upon NH3 exposure at room temperature. The PEDOT:PSS sensor acts as an electron acceptor for NH3 detection. It is hoped that this work will be useful for better understanding of the NH3 interactions with PEDOT:PSS and can be used to confirm the direct charge transfer sensing mechanism of PEDOT:PSS gas sensors for NH3 detection.







Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate)


Radial distribution function


Root mean square deviations


Self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding


Styrene sulfonate



We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Faculty of Science and Kasetsart University for the grant no. RFG1-14.

Authors’ Contributions

AM performed the computational simulations. YS carried out the sensor fabrication measurements. CW conceived and designed the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University
Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi


  1. Dietrich M, Heinze J, Heywang G, Jonas F (1994) Electrochemical and spectroscopic characterization of polyalkylenedioxythiophenes. J Electroanal Chem 369:87–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pei Q, Zuccarello G, Ahskog M, Inganas O (1994) Electrochromic and highly stable poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene) switches between opaque blue-black and transparent sky blue. Polymer 35:1347–1351View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kiebooms R, Aleshin A, Hutchson K, Wudl F (1997) Thermal and electromagnetic behavior of doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) films. J Phy Chem B 101:11037–11039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ouyang J (2013) Secondary doping methods to significantly enhance the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS for its application as transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices. Displays 34:423–436View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li H, Xiao Y, Han G, Hou W (2017) Honeycomb-like poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as an effective and transparent counter electrode in bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 342:709–716View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozkurt A, Lal A (2011) Low-cost flexible printed circuit technology based microelectrode array for extracellular stimulation of the invertebrate locomotory system. Sens Actuat A Phys 169:89–97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hebler AC, Schmidt GC, Kemp H, Reuter K, Hambsch M, Bellman M (2011) Three- dimensional integrated circuit using printed electronics. Org Electron 12:419–423View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sam FLM, Razali MA, Jayawardena KDGI, Mills CA, Rozanski LJ, Beliatis MJ, Silva SRP (2014) Silver grid transparent conducting electrodes for organic light emitting diodes. Org Electron 15:3492–3500View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ouyang S, Xie Y, Zhu D, Xu X, Wang D, Tan T, Fong HH (2014) Photolithographic patterning of PEDOT:PSS with a silver interlayer and its application in organic light emitting diodes. Org Electron 15:1822–1827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Shen X, Chen L, Pan J, Hu Y, Li S, Zhao J (2017) Improved work function of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonic acid) and its effect on hybrid silicon/organic heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang Z, Fang Z, Sheng J, Ling Z, Liu Z, Zhu J, Gao P, Ye J (2017) Optoelectronic evaluation and loss analysis of PEDOT:PSS/Si hybrid heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:26View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yamashita T, Takamatsu S, Miyake K, Itoh T (2013) Fabrication and evaluation of a conductive polymer coated elastomer contact structure for woven electronic textile. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 195:213–218View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva FAR, Sales MJA, Angelica RS, Maia ER, Ceschin AM (2011) Characterization of the PEDOT:PSS/KDP mixture on a flexible substrates and the use in pressure sensing devices. Appl Surf Sci 257:8594–8599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenz A, Kariis H, Pohl A, Persson P, Ojamae L (2011) The electronic structure and reflectivity of PEDOT:PSS from density functional theory. Chem Phys 384:44–51View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dkhissi A, Beljonne D, Lazzaroni R (2009) Atomic scale modeling of interfacial structure of PEDOT/PSS. Synth Met 159:546–549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirchmeyer S, Reuter K (2005) Scientific importance, properties and growing applications of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). J Mater Chem 15:2077–2088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Seekaew Y, Lokavee S, Phokharatkul D, Wisitsoraat A, Kerdcharoen T, Wongchoosuk C (2014) Low-cost and flexible printed graphene–PEDOT:PSS gas sensor for ammonia detection. Org Electron 15:2971–2981View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dkhissi A, Beljonne D, Lazzaroni R, Louwet F, Groenendaal L, Bredas JL (2003) Density functional theory and Hartree–Fock studies of the geometric and electronic structure of neutral and doped ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) oligomers. Int J Quant Chem 91:517–523View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dkhissi A, Louwet F, Groenendaal L, Beljonne D, Lazzaroni R, Bredas JL (2002) Theoretical investigation of the nature of the ground state in the low-bandgap conjugated polymer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Chem Phys Lett 359:466–472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Aleman C, Armelin E, Iribarren JI, Liesa F, Laso M, Casanovas J (2005) Structural and electronic properties of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene, 3,4-ethylenedisulfanylfurane and thiophene oligomers: A theoretical investigation. Synth Met 149:151–156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gangopadhyay R, Das B, Molla MR (2014) How does PEDOT combine with PSS insights from structural studies. RSC Adv 4:43912–43920View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Timmer B, Olthuis W, van den Berg A (2005) Ammonia sensors and their applications a review. Sens Actuator B 107:666–677View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pang Z, Yang Z, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wang Q, Huang F, Wei Q (2016) A room temperature ammonia gas sensor based on cellulose/TiO2/PANI composite nanofibers. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 494:248–255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang D, Jiang C, Sun Y (2017) Room-temperature high-performance ammonia gas sensor based on layer-by-layer self-assembled molybdenum disulfide/zinc oxide nanocomposite film. J Alloys Compd 698:476–483View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Moon S, Vuong NM, Lee D, Kim D, Lee H, Kim D, Hong S-K, Yoon S-G (2016) Co3O4-SWCNT composites for H2S gas sensor application. Sens Actuators B 222:166–172View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaus M, Cui Q, Elstner M (2011) DFTB3: extension of the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method (SCC-DFTB). J Chem Theory Comput 7:931–948View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Elstner M (2006) The SCC-DFTB method and its application to biological systems. Theor Chem Acc 116:316–325View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wongchoosuk C, Wang Y, Kerdcharoen T, Irle S (2014) Nonequilibrium quantum chemical molecular dynamics simulations of C60 to SiC heterofullerene conversion. Carbon 68:285–295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Feng X, Irle S, Witek H, Morokuma K, Vidic R, Borguet E (2005) Sensitivity of ammonia interaction with single-walled carbon nanotube bundles to the presence of defect sites and functionalities. J Am Chem Soc 127:10533–10538View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Elstner M, Porezag D, Jungnickel G, Elsner J, Haugk M, Frauenheim T (1998) Self-consistent-charge density functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties. Phys Rev B 58:7260–7268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bende A, Knapp-Mohammady M, Suhai S (2003) BSSE-free description of intermolecular force constants in hydrogen fluoride and water dimers. Int J Quantum Chem 92:152–159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaus M, Cui Q, Elstner M (2011) DFTB3: Extension of the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method (SCC-DFTB). J Chem Theory Comput 7:931–948View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Aradi B, Hourahine B, Frauenheim T (2007) DFTB+ a sparse matrix-based implementation of the DFTB method. J Phys Chem B 111:5678–5684View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Niehaus TA, Elstner M, Frauenheim T, Suhai S (2001) Application of an approximate density-functional method to sulfur containing compounds. J Mol Struc (THEOCHEM) 541:185–194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tong X-M, Chu S-I (1997) Density-functional theory with optimized effective potential and self-interaction correction for ground states and autoionizing resonances. Phys Rev A 55:3406–3416View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cohen AJ, Handy NC (2000) Assessment of exchange correlation functional. Chem Phys Lett 316:160–166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rives JT, Jorgensen WL (2008) Performance of B3LYP density functional methods for a large set of organic molecules. J Chem Theory Comput 4:297–306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su SJ, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA (1993) General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 14:1347–1363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Weinert M, Davenport JW (1992) Fractional occupations and density-functional energies and forces. Phys Rev B 45:13709–13712View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wentzcovitch R, Martins J, Allen P (1992) Energy versus free energy conservation in first-principles molecular dynamics. Phys Rev B 45:11372–11374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Van Gunsteren WF, Dinola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular-dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Swope W, Andersen H, Berens P, Wilson K (1982) A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 76:637–49View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim GH, Hwang DH, Woo SI (2012) Thermoelectric properties of nanocomposite thin films prepared with poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) and graphene. Phys Chem Phys 14:3530–3536View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sotzing GA, Reynolds JR, Steel PI (1991) Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) prepared via electrochemical polymerization of EDOT, 2,2'-Bis(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (BiEDOT), and their TMS derivatives. Adv Mater 9:795–798View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Huang H, Pickup PG (1998) A donor-acceptor conducting copolymer with a very low band gap and high intrinsic conductivity. Chem Mater 10:2212–2216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sankaran B, Reynolds JR (1997) High-contrast electrochromic polymers from alkyl-derivatized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophenes). Macromolecules 30:2582–2588View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ullah H, Ayub K, Ullah Z, Hanif M, Nawaz R, Shaha AHA, Bilal S (2013) Theoretical insight of polypyrrole ammonia gas sensor. Synth Met 172:14–20View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA III, Skiff WM (1992) Uff, A full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024–10035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Elstner M, Hobza P, Frauenheim T, Suhai S, Kaxiras E (2001) Hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions of nucleic acid base pairs: a density-functional-theory based treatment. J Chem Phys 114:5149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu J, Tao K, Miao J, Norford LK (2015) Improved selectivity and sensitivity of gas sensing using a 3D reduced graphene oxide hydrogel with an integrated microheater. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:27502–27510View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Cui S, Pu H, Lu G, Wen Z, Mattson EC, Hirschmugl C, Josifovska MG, Weinert M, Chen J (2012) Fast and selective room-temperature ammonia sensors using silver nanocrystal-functionalized carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4898–4904View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sengupta PP, Barik S, Adhikari B (2007) Polyaniline as a gas-sensor material. Mater Manuf Process 21:263–270View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Chen T-Y, Chen H-I, Hsu C-S, Huang C-C, Wu J-S, Chou P-C, Liu W-C (2015) Characteristics of ZnO nanorods-based ammonia gas sensors with a cross-linked configuration. Sens Actuators B 221:491–498View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Li Y, Chen N, Deng D, Xing X, Xiao X, Wang Y (2017) Formaldehyde detection: SnO2 microspheres for formaldehyde gas sensor with high sensitivity, fast response/recovery and good selectivity. Sens Actuators B 238:264–273View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang Z, Zhu L, Wen Z, Ye Z (2017) Controllable synthesis of Co3O4 crossed nanosheet arrays toward an acetone gas sensor. Sens Actuators B 238:1052–1059View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017