# Nonuniform Effect of Carrier Separation Efficiency and Light Absorption in Type-II Perovskite Nanowire Solar Cells

- Weiping Wang
^{1}, - Jialun He
^{1}, - Yiyan Cao
^{1}, - Lijing Kong
^{1}, - Xuanli Zheng
^{1}Email author, - Yaping Wu
^{1}, - Xiaohong Chen
^{1}, - Shuping Li
^{1}, - Zhiming Wu
^{1}Email author and - Junyong Kang
^{1}Email author

**Received: **17 December 2016

**Accepted: **12 February 2017

**Published: **1 March 2017

## Abstract

Coaxial structures exhibit great potential for the application of high-efficiency solar cells due to the novel mechanism of radial charge separation. Here, we intensively investigate the nonuniform effect of carrier separation efficiency (CSE) and light absorption in perovskite-based type-II coaxial nanowire solar cells (ZnO/CH_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3}). Results show that the CSE rapidly decreases along the radial direction in the shell, and the value at the outer side becomes extremely low for the thick shell. Besides, the position of the main light absorption gradually moves to the outer side with the increase of the shell thickness. As a result, the external quantum efficiency shows a positional dependence with a maximal value close to the border of the nanowire. Eventually, in our case, it is found that the maximal power conversion efficiency of the solar cells reduces from 19.5 to 17.9% under the effect of the nonuniformity of CSE and light absorption. This work provides a basis for the design of high-efficiency solar cells, especially type-II nanowire solar cells.

## Keywords

_{3}NH

_{3}PbI

_{3}coaxial nanowiresNonuniform effectCarrier separation efficiencySolar cell

## Background

Recently, the lead halide perovskite (CH_{3}NH_{3}PbX_{3},X = Cl, Br, I)-based solar cells (PSCs) have attracted considerable attention because of their high power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) and simple fabrication technique [1–5]. In previous studies, PSCs were generally fabricated by employing a similar structure to dye-sensitized solar cells with mesoporous-TiO_{2} as the electron transportation layer (ETL) [6–8]. Nowadays, many research interests turn to the planar architecture PSCs of ITO/hole transportation layer (HTL)/perovskite/ETL, which exclude the mesoporous-TiO_{2} layer. The reported PCEs are about 15% in this kind of cells [9–11]. With the purpose of further improving cell performance, many efforts, such as process modification and interface engineering, have been made [12, 13]. For example, Nie et al. fabricated planar solar cells with a PCE approaching 18% by using a hot-casting technique [12]; Zhou et al. boosted the cells with an average PCE up to 16% by using Yttrium-doped TiO_{2} as the ETL [13]. Compared with conventional film structure, coaxial structures have larger surface-area-to-volume ratio, longer light absorption length, and higher carrier separation efficiency (CSE) [14–17]. As such, coaxial structures may provide a great potential for the application of high-efficiency PSCs.

In this work, we construct a kind of type-II coaxial perovskite nanowire (ZnO/CH_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3}) and intensively investigate the nonuniformity of CSE, light absorption, and external quantum efficiency (EQE) inside the nanowires by combining the semiconductor diffusion theory and finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations [22–25]. Results demonstrate that the CSE rapidly decreases along the radial direction in the shell, which totally differs from that of the p-n junction nanowires. Besides, the light absorption inside the nanowires also shows a nonuniform feature. As a result, the EQE presents a positional dependence with a maximum value close to the border of the nanowire. Eventually, in our case, an ideal PCE of 19.5% is obtained in the nanowire with the shell thickness of ~60 nm, and this value decreases to 17.9% when considering the nonuniform effect of CSE and the light absorption. This work provides guidance on the design of high-efficiency solar cells.

## Methods

### Theory of CSE

_{3}NH

_{3}PbI

_{3}nanowire solar cell, in which 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenyl-amine)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-MeOTAD) and sliver are used as the HTL and the electrode, respectively. Figure 2b demonstrates the energy level diagram. A type-II energy alignment is formed at the interface between the ZnO and CH

_{3}NH

_{3}PbI

_{3}, which supports the separation of photo-generated carriers. To calculate the CSE of coaxial nanowire cells, a theoretical model is constructed. As shown in Fig. 2c,

*R*

_{ C },

*R*

_{ N },

*T*

_{ S }, and

*L*represent the radius of the core, the radius of the whole nanowire, the shell thickness, and the length of the nanowire, respectively. When the light normally irradiates on the top surface of the nanowire, the holes (minority-carriers) in the core satisfy the continuity equation [25, 26],

*τ*

_{ h }is the lifetime of carriers, s

*g*

_{ h }is the generation rate of the non equilibrium carriers, \( {\overrightarrow{J}}_n \) is the current density, and

*Δh*(

*r*) is the distribution of excess hole concentration with respect to the equilibrium value. Assuming that all the carriers diffuse along the radial direction, namely, minority-carrier diffusion in the vertical direction is negligible [17], the steady-state Eq. (1) can be then derived as below,

where *D*
_{
h
} stands for the hole-diffusion coefficient, which depends on the hole drift velocity and material temperature.

- (i)The increase of the photo-generated holes is equal to that of the decrease amount, which includes the recombination loss and the diffusion part (from core to shell). It can be expressed as,$$ 2\pi \cdot \frac{g_h{\tau}_h L{R_C}^2}{2}=2\pi \cdot {f}_{C\to S}\varDelta h(0){\tau}_h L{R}_C+2\pi \cdot \frac{L}{2}{\displaystyle {\int}_0^{R_C}\varDelta h(r) dr}, $$(3)
where

*f*_{ C → S }is the outflow rate of the holes at the interface. It is related to the band alignment of the two materials. Larger band offset leads to a greater*f*_{ C → S }. - (ii)The gradient of hole concentration is proportional to the outflow rate at the interface,$$ {\left.{D}_h\frac{\partial \varDelta h(r)}{\partial r}\right|}_{r={R}_C}={f}_{C\to S}\varDelta h(0). $$(4)

*f*

_{C → S}is assumed to be infinite, then Eq. (4) is simplified as,

*k*

_{ i }, (

*i*=

*c*,

*s*), where the subscript c and s represent the core and the shell, respectively. Consequently, the CSE of the core is derived as below,

### Optical Simulation

The light absorption and its distribution in coaxial nanowires were stimulated by using the software *FDTD Solutions* from Lumerical Solutions. In the simulation, an aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) transparent conducting layer with the thickness of 500 nm was deposited on the 1000-nm-thick glass and used as the substrate. Coaxial nanowire array was constructed with a period of 400 nm above the substrate. The length *L* and the core radius *R*
_{
C
} of nanowires were fixed to be 1000 nm and 25 nm, respectively. The shell thickness varied from 25 to 150 nm. The optical parameters of ZnO, AZO, and perovskite material (CH_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3}) were acquired from Ref. [22] and Ref. [27], respectively, and the background index is set to 1. The diffusion length of perovskite material is set to 130 nm based on the experimental result in Ref. [28]. During the simulation, light normally irradiated on the top of nanowires, and all the results were normalized with the standard one sun AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW/cm^{2}).

### Calculation of EQE and PCEs

*I*

_{ SC }can be calculated by weighting the incident solar spectrum (spectral power

*P*

_{ AM 1.5G }(

*λ*)) with the absorption as below [29],

where *α*(*r*, *λ*) is the *r*-dependent absorptivity and *A*
_{
SC
} is the macroscopic area of a nanowire array solar cell constituting a large integer number of unit cells.

*r*is different, which can be calculated by the following formula,

*UE*) of a solar cell can be expressed as

*E*

_{ g }represents the band offset between the ZnO and the perovskite material. According to the energy level in Fig. 2b, the value of

*E*

_{ g }is 1.51 eV. Based on Skockley and Queisser’s theory [30], the PCE of a solar cell can be derived as follows,

Here, *v* is the ratio of open circuit voltage (*V*
_{
OC
}) to *E*
_{
g
}
*/e*, and FF is the fill factor. According to equations (3.19) and (5.5) in Ref. [30], the maximal *V*
_{
OC
} and FF at room temperature (300 K) can be obtained, and their values are 1.24 V and 90%, respectively.

## Results and Discussion

*k*

_{ s }under uniform light irradiation. It can be seen that the concentration is very low (approximately zero) in the entire shell layer when

*k*

_{ s }is small (i.e., a thin shell); with the increase of

*k*

_{ s }, the concentration at the interface almost remains unchanged; however, it gradually increases in the outer shell. Figure 3b reveals the corresponding CSE results, showing significant dependence on the shell thickness (or

*k*

_{ s }) that thinner shell generates higher CSE. The maximal CSE approaches almost 100% for the

*k*

_{ s }of 0.1, and it is still over 60% at the outer surface when

*k*

_{ s }increases to 1.0. Note that the CSE at the outer side becomes extremely low as

*k*

_{ s }exceeds a certain value and is close to zero for the

*k*

_{ s }of 10.0. This is because that, in this case, the carriers at the outer side are difficult to diffuse to the interface for separation. Thus, a thin shell is beneficial for the carrier separation. On the other hand, a thin shell might be unfavorable for the light absorption. Therefore, shell thickness is an important parameter in designing and fabricating high-efficiency solar cell.

^{2}). As shown in Fig. 4a, the main absorption of all the nanowires occurs in visible region with a threshold wavelength of about 800 nm, corresponding to the bandgap (1.60 eV) of CH

_{3}NH

_{3}PbI

_{3}. The absorption peaks and intensities vary with the shell thickness

*T*

_{ S }. The absorption peaks first redshift and then blueshift with the increase of

*T*

_{ S }, but the total absorbed energies have a dramatic increase at the beginning and then tend to be saturated. The strongest absorption appears with the shell thickness of ~60 nm. This behavior may be related to the quantity of the absorbing material and the number of optical guided modes in the nanowires [24, 31–34]. When the nanowire is thin, the incident light, especially in the long-wavelength regime, easily penetrates without significant interaction, resulting in a poor absorption. With the increase of

*T*

_{ S }, the increased shell material and numbers of guided modes are both helpful to improve the light absorption, which causes the redshift of absorption peak. However, further increasing the

*T*

_{ S }will lead to energy loss due to the increased light reflection and transmission [34] and results in the blueshift of absorption peak. It is believed that the light absorption can be further enhanced by optimizing the structure and the dimension of coaxial nanowires.

*L*

_{ S }is set to 130 nm). For comparison, we also calculated the corresponding EQEs of the nanowires without considering the effect of nonuniform CSE (diffusion length

*L*

_{ S }is infinite). As shown in Fig. 6, the EQE in shell layers are much larger than that in ZnO core layers owing to the stronger light absorption. In addition, for all the nanowires, the peak positions of EQEs are close to that of the outer sides, which is similar to the phenomenon of the light absorption distributions shown in Fig. 5. The peak values of EQEs are quite different for different nanowires. The nanowire with a shell thickness of 50 nm shows a maximal EQE at the position with the radius of 66 nm. It should be pointed out that, with the consideration of the nonuniform CSE in type-II coaxial nanowires, all the EQEs reduce in varying degrees, and the decrease become more distinguished for the thicker nanowire. This means that there is an optimized shell thickness for designing high-efficiency solar cells.

*L*

_{ S }= 130 nm) [28], the PCE decreases in varying degrees with the shell thickness, and moreover, the decreasing becomes more evident for the thicker shell. In this case, the peak value reduces from 19.5 to 17.9%. Notably, this work focuses on the effect of CSE and light absorption on PCE, and the PCE of 17.9% could be improved by optimizing other parameters, such as nanowire length and core radius. In short, when designing or fabricating type-II coaxial nanowire solar cells, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the influence of nonuniform CSE, light absorption distribution, and geometrical dimensions on cell performance.

## Conclusions

In conclusion, we deeply investigate the nonuniformity of the CSE, the light absorption, and the EQEs at different positions inside type-II ZnO/CH_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3} nanowires, and their influence on PCEs of nanowire solar cells by combining the semiconductor diffusion theory and FDTD simulations. Results show that the CSE rapidly decreases along the radial direction in the shell, and the value at the outer side becomes extremely low for the thick shell. The light absorption intensity varies with shell thickness. Meanwhile, the absorbed energy does not uniformly distribute in the shell layer, and the peak position gradually moves towards the outer side with the increase of the shell thickness. As a result, the peak positions of EQEs are close to the outer side, and the maximal EQE is obtained in the nanowire with the shell thickness of 60 nm. Finally, we calculate the PCEs of coaxial nanowire solar cells. It is found that the nonuniform CSE and light absorption in type-II nanowires will result in a decrease of PCE, and the decreasing becomes more evident for the nanowire with the thicker shell. In the case with the diffusion length of 130 nm, the maximal value reduces from 19.5 to 17.9%. Although this work focuses on the ZnO/CH_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3} coaxial nanowire cell, this method can be applied to other wide-bandgap semiconductor/perovskite type-II nanowire cells. In all, this work provides guidance on the design of high-efficiency solar cells, especially the type-II coaxial nanowire solar cells.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0400801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61227009 and 61674124), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. 2015 J01028), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 20720150027, 20720150033, 20720160044, and 20720160122).

### Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0400801) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61227009 and 61674124) supported the design of the study and analysis and interpretation of data. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. 2015 J01028) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 20720150027, 20720150033, 20720160044, and 20720160122) provided support in writing the manuscript.

### Authors’ contributions

WPW carried out the theoretical calculation and drafted the manuscript. XLZ performed the FDTD simulation. JLH, YYC, LJK, XHC, SPL, YPW, and JYK took part in the discussion of results. ZMW and XLZ participated in the conception of the project, improved the manuscript, and coordinated between all the participants. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Yang WS, Noh JH, Jeon NJ, Kim YC, Ryu S, Seo J, Seok SI (2015) High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 348:1234–1237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Wu Y, Yue Y, Liu J, Zhang W, Yang X, Chen H, Bi E, Ashraful I, Grätzel M, Han L (2015) Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 350:944–948View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tong X, Lin F, Wu J, Wang ZM (2016) High performance perovskite solar cells. Adv Sci (Weinh) 3:1500201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung HS, Park NG (2015) Perovskite solar cells: from materials to devices. Small 11:10–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, Zhang Z, Cai Y, Chen J, Wang J, Huang R, Lu X, Gao X, Shui L, Wu S, Liu JM (2016) Enhanced performance of CH
_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3-x}Cl_{x}perovskite solar cells by CH_{3}NH_{3}I modification of TiO_{2}-perovskite layer interface. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:316View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wojciechowski K, Saliba M, Leijtens T, Abate A, Snaith HJ (2014) Sub-150 °C processed meso-superstructured perovskite solar cells with enhanced efficiency. Energy Environ Sci 7:1142–1147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeon NJ, Noh JH, Kim YC, Yang WS, Ryu S, Seok SI (2014) Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat Mater 13:897–903View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Im JH, Jang IH, Pellet N, Gratzel M, Park NG (2014) Growth of CH
_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3}cuboids with controlled size for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Nat Nanotechnol 9:927–932View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chiang C-H, Tseng Z-L, Wu C-G (2014) Planar heterojunction perovskite/PC
_{71}BM solar cells with enhanced open-circuit voltage via a (2/1)-step spin-coating process. J Mater Chem A 2:15897–15903View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chang J, Zhu H, Li B, Isikgor FH, Hao Y, Xu Q, Ouyang J (2016) Boosting the performance of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cell by controlling the precursor purity of perovskite materials. J Mater Chem A 4:887–893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin Q, Armin A, Nagiri RCR, Burn PL, Meredith P (2014) Electro-optics of perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics 9:106–112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nie W, Tsai H, Asadpour R, Blancon J-C, Neukirch JA, Gupta G, Crochet JJ, Chhowalla M, Tretiak S, Alam MA et al (2015) High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains. Science 347:522–525View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou H, Chen Q, Li G, Luo S, Song TB, Duan HS, Hong Z, You J, Liu Y, Yang Y (2014) Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345:542–546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krogstrup P, Jørgensen HI, Heiss M, Demichel O, Holm JV, Aagesen M, Nygard J, Fontcuberta i Morral A (2013) Single-nanowire solar cells beyond the Shockley–Queisser limit. Nat Photonics 7:306–310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adachi MM, Anantram MP, Karim KS (2013) Core-shell silicon nanowire solar cells. Sci Rep 3:1546Google Scholar
- Sandhu S, Fan S (2015) Current–voltage enhancement of a single coaxial nanowire solar cell. ACS Photonics 2:1698–1704View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kayes BM, Atwater HA, Lewis NS (2005) Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. J Appl Phys 97:114302View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu Z, Wang W, Cao Y, He J, Luo Q, Bhutto WA, Li S, Kang J (2014) A beyond near-infrared response in a wide-bandgap ZnO/ZnSe coaxial nanowire solar cell by pseudomorphic layers. J Mater Chem A 2:14571View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeng Y, Ye Q, Shen W (2014) Design principles for single standing nanowire solar cells: going beyond the planar efficiency limits. Sci Rep 4:4915Google Scholar
- Li Y, Li M, Song D, Liu H, Jiang B, Bai F, Chu L (2015) Broadband light-concentration with near-surface distribution by silver capped silicon nanowire for high-performance solar cells. Nano Energy 11:756–764View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SK, Zhang X, Hill DJ, Song KD, Park JS, Park HG, Cahoon JF (2015) Doubling absorption in nanowire solar cells with dielectric shell optical antennas. Nano Lett 15:753–758View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michallon J, Zanuccoli M, Kaminski-Cachopo A, Consonni V, Morand A, Bucci D, Emieux F, Szambolics H, Perraud S, Semenikhin I (2013) Comparison of optical properties of Si and ZnO/CdTe core/shell nanowire arrays. Mater Sci Eng B 178:665–669View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michallon J, Bucci D, Morand A, Zanuccoli M, Consonni V, Kaminski-Cachopo A (2014) Light trapping in ZnO nanowire arrays covered with an absorbing shell for solar cells. Opt Express 22(Suppl 4):A1174–A1189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wen L, Zhao Z, Li X, Shen Y, Guo H, Wang Y (2011) Theoretical analysis and modeling of light trapping in high efficicency GaAs nanowire array solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 99:143116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Roosbroeck W (1953) The transport of added current carriers in a homogeneous semiconductor. Phys Rev 91:282–289View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snowden C (1986) Introduction to semiconductor device modeling. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Jiang Y, Green MA, Sheng R, Ho-Baillie A (2015) Room temperature optical properties of organic–inorganic lead halide perovskites. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 137:253–257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xing G, Mathews N, Sun S, Lim SS, Lam YM, Grätzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Sum TC (2013) Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH
_{3}NH_{3}PbI_{3}. Science 342:344–347View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kupec J, Stoop R, Witzigmann B (2010) Light absorption and emission in nanowire array solar cells. Opt Express 18:27589–27605View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shockley W, Queisser HJ (1961) Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys 32:510–519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sturmberg BC, Dossou KB, Botten LC, Asatryan AA, Poulton CG, McPhedran RC, de Sterke CM (2013) Absorption enhancing proximity effects in aperiodic nanowire arrays. Opt Express 21(Suppl 6):A964–A969View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bu S, Li X, Wen L, Zeng X, Zhao Y, Wang W, Wang Y (2013) Optical and electrical simulations of two-junction III-V nanowires on Si solar cell. Appl Phys Lett 102:031106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, Li X, Wen L, Zhao Y, Duan H, Zhou B, Shi T, Zeng X, Li N, Wang Y (2014) Optical simulations of P3HT/Si nanowire array hybrid solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Yu H, Li Y (2012) Solar energy harnessing in hexagonally arranged Si nanowire arrays and effects of array symmetry on optical characteristics. Nanotechnology 23:194010View ArticleGoogle Scholar